We first analyzed how T cells infected with WT or
Δvif HIV stimulate HS-CTLs. To this end, primary CD4
+ T cells harboring endogenous A3G were infected with HIV particles produced in the absence of A3G (). From the literature, we anticipated that after CD4
+ T infection, A3G will be incorporated in the progeny virions, thus exerting its editing activity starting from the second cycle of replication. Viral propagation was monitored by flow cytometry (intracellular Gag staining; ). As expected, replication of HIV
Δvif was markedly reduced compared with HIV, with 3 and 20% Gag
+ cells at day 5 after infection, respectively. We compared the ability of HIV and HIV
Δvif-infected CD4
+ T cells to activate EM40-F21, an HS CD8
+ CTL clone (). EM40-F21 was derived from an HIV-infected patient and recognizes a well-characterized immunodominant epitope of Gag p17 (SL9) presented by HLA-A*0201 (
Moris et al., 2004). Surprisingly, HIV
Δvif-infected CD4
+ T cells activated EM40-F21 to a greater extent than cells infected with the WT virus (). Similar results were obtained with cells from three different donors infected with various HIV inocula (). When expressed as the number of IFN-γ–producing CTL/Gag
+ CD4 cells, CD4
+ T cells infected with HIV
Δvif were found to be two to three times more efficient at activating HS-CTLs than HIV-infected cells (Wilcoxon rank-sum test: P = 0.032; ). These data strongly suggest that there is dissociation between the capacity of HIV
Δvif to infect CD4
+ T cells and to activate HS-CTLs.
To escape CTL recognition, the HIV Nef protein down-regulates the surface expression of HLA class I molecules (
Schwartz et al., 1996). We asked whether Nef might affect the immunogenicity of HIV
Δvif-infected T cells. To this end, we constructed a
ΔnefΔvif double mutant (HIV
Δnefvif). HIV
Δnef isolates replicate less efficiently than WT virus. To obtain sufficient numbers of infected cells, CD4
+ T lymphocytes were exposed to VSV-G–pseudotyped HIV
Δnef and HIV
Δnefvif (). HIV
Δnefvif replication was reduced (three- to sixfold) compared with HIV
Δnef at 48 and 72 h after infection. Remarkably, at each time point, even if very few Gag
+ cells were detected, HIV
Δnefvif induced a robust activation of HS-CTLs (). As expected, Nef-deficient isolates were more efficient than WT virus in activating CTLs (). Similar results were obtained with cells from eight different donors (), demonstrating that cells infected with HIV
Δnefvif were two to three times more efficient than HIV
Δnef-infected cells in activating HS-CTLs (Wilcoxon rank-sum test: P = 0.0005; ). Therefore, the enhancing effect of
Δvif on CTL activation is observed both in the context of WT and
Δnef HIV.
CTLs secrete a panel of chemokine and cytokine upon activation (
Price et al., 1998;
Wagner et al., 1998;
Appay et al., 2008). We performed a peptide titration experiment to identify cytokines other than IFN-γ that are secreted in an antigen-specific manner by EM40-F21. Primary CD4
+ T cells were loaded with the SL9 peptide, co-cultured with HS-CTLs, and lymphokine production was analyzed in culture supernatants using the luminex technology. As previously reported (
Price et al., 1998;
Wagner et al., 1998), we observed a dose-dependent secretion of MIP-1α and MIP-1β (). Thereafter, we examined the effect of
Δvif viruses on MIP-1β and MIP-1α secretions by EM40-F21. Primary T cells were infected with VSV-G-HIV
Δnef and -HIV
Δnefvif, monitored for Gag expression (12 and 1% of Gag
+ cells, respectively), and used to activate EM40-F21 (). Using IFN-γ Elispot, we first confirmed the enhancing effect of
Δvif on IFN-γ secretion by EM40-F21 (). We then measured in co-culture supernatants the release of MIP-1α and MIP-1β. Upon co-culture with HIV
Δnef- and HIV
Δnefvif-infected targets (at a ratio of 1 CTL to 50 CD4
+ target cells), EM40-F21 secreted similar levels of MIP-1α (130 and 106 pg/ml, respectively; ). HIV
Δnef- and HIV
Δnefvif-infected cells also allowed the secretion of MIP-1β (292 and 167 pg/ml, respectively; ). These levels were at least three times higher than background secretion induced by uninfected control cells (). HIV infection did not increase the background lymphokine production by target CD4
+ T cells alone (unpublished data). We noticed that the secretion of MIP-1β with
Δnefvif viruses was reduced as compared with
Δnef (), suggesting that the effect of
Δvif viruses might vary depending on the lymphokine. Nonetheless, even if very few Gag
+ cells were detected, HIV
Δnefvif induced a potent secretion of both MIP-1α and MIP-1β by HS-CTLs (). To gain information on the magnitude of A3G-mediated effect, we used MIP-1α and MIP-1β SL9 peptide titration curves () as standards to calculate the relative antigen presentation levels on the surface of infected (Gag
+) target cells. Based on MIP-1α secretion, HIV
Δnef- and HIV
Δnefvif-infected cells presented 6.6 × 10
−15 and 4 × 10
−14 exogenous peptide equivalent, respectively. Based on MIP-1β secretion, the relative antigen presentation levels were 1.98 × 10
−15 and 7.9 × 10
−15 exogenous peptide equivalent for HIV
Δnef- and HIV
Δnefvif Gag
+ cells, respectively. Thereafter, cells infected with HIV
Δnefvif viruses likely present four to six times more peptide antigen than cells infected with HIV
Δnef. This calculation was done using populations harboring different percentages of Gag
+ cells. It would have also been informative to confirm these findings by calculating exogenous peptide equivalents in the presence of equal number of infected (Gag
+) target cells. The low replicative capacity of HIV
Δnefvif in primary CD4
+ T cells precluded this possibility. As expected, titrating down the amount of infected cells in the co-culture (1 CTL for 10 CD4
+ targets) reduced the overall secretion levels and confirmed that in the absence of Vif, infected cells enhance cytokine production by HS-CTLs (
Fig. S1). It is noteworthy that Nevirapine, a reverse transcription inhibitor of viral replication, blocked antigen presentation, indicating that activation of EM40-F21 was not a result of the presentation of incoming HIV antigens (). Collectively, our results demonstrate that Vif-deficient HIV-1 replicates less efficiently but is a potent activator of HS-CTLs, inducing the secretion of various lymphokines such as IFN-γ, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β. More specifically, Vif impacts the immunogenicity of HIV-infected T cells. In infected cells, Vif targets A3G for proteasomal degradation (
Mariani et al., 2003;
Yu et al., 2003); therefore, A3G may render HIV-infected cells more able to activate CTLs.