|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Over 35% of returned Iraq and Afghanistan veterans in VA care have received mental health diagnoses; the most prevalent is post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Little is known about these patients’ use of non-mental health medical services and the impact of mental disorders on utilization.
To compare utilization across three groups of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans: those without mental disorders, those with mental disorders other than PTSD, and those with PTSD.
National, descriptive study of 249,440 veterans newly utilizing VA healthcare between October 7, 2001 and March 31, 2007, followed until March 31, 2008.
We used ICD9-CM diagnostic codes to classify mental health status. We compared utilization of outpatient non-mental health services, primary care, medical subspecialty, ancillary services, laboratory tests/diagnostic procedures, emergency services, and hospitalizations during veterans’ first year in VA care. Results were adjusted for demographics and military service and VA facility characteristics.
Veterans with mental disorders had 42–146% greater utilization than those without mental disorders, depending on the service category (all P<0.001). Those with PTSD had the highest utilization in all categories: 71–170% greater utilization than those without mental disorders (all P<0.001). In adjusted analyses, compared with veterans without mental disorders, those with mental disorders other than PTSD had 55% higher utilization of all non-mental health outpatient services; those with PTSD had 91% higher utilization. Female sex and lower rank were also independently associated with greater utilization.
Veterans with mental health diagnoses, particularly PTSD, utilize significantly more VA non-mental health medical services. As more veterans return home, we must ensure resources are allocated to meet their outpatient, inpatient, and emergency needs.
To date, over 1.6 million US men and women have served in the wars in Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom, OIF) and Afghanistan and surrounding regions (Operation Enduring Freedom, OEF). Prior research has shown that returning OEF/OIF veterans are at high risk for mental disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is the most commonly diagnosed disorder.1–3 In addition, a recent analysis of over 200,000 returning OEF/OIF veterans seen at Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare facilities found that the rates of PTSD and other mental disorders were increasing over time.4 Recognizing the serious impact of these conditions, particularly PTSD, and meeting the healthcare needs of veterans with mental disorders has been the focus of high-profile scientific study and media attention.1,5,6
The VA has been one of the largest providers of healthcare for returning veterans and, in the past several years, has expanded access to more veterans of the current conflicts. Over 40% of all separated OEF/OIF veterans have obtained outpatient and/or inpatient care at VA facilities.4 This is a greater proportion than in prior wars; for instance, only 10% of Vietnam veterans enrolled in VA care.7 This increase in VA use may be due to a combination of expansion of VA eligibility and increasing problems with cost and accessibility of private insurance.8 The recognition of the growing prevalence of OEF/OIF veterans with mental health disorders has led to a nationwide effort to expand VA mental health services.1,9 However, far less is known about OEF/OIF veterans’ needs for non-mental health medical services and about the impact of mental disorders on medical service utilization in this population.6,10,11
Studies from OEF/OIF and prior wars have demonstrated that mental disorders, particularly PTSD, are associated with higher rates of physical symptoms, chronic physical illness, and overall mortality.6,12–14 This increased burden of physical diseases may translate into greater non-mental health medical service utilization, as suggested by a study showing that PTSD was associated greater self-reported primary care visits in 2,863 OIF veterans 6 and by studies examining utilization in veterans of prior wars.11,15–19 Yet, mental disorders and their associated stigma and risk for social isolation and cognitive impairment may also act as barriers to medical treatment.16,20 In addition, the unique features of the current wars, including the greater number of woman in combat roles and specific types of injuries (traumatic brain injury), could change utilization patterns and highlight the importance of studying this new cohort of veterans.21,22
Evaluating the rate and types of medical services used by OEF/OIF veterans with and without mental disorders is critical in planning for the care of this growing population of returning veterans. The current climate of limited economic resources makes this information vital not only for the VA, but also for the numerous private and public healthcare institutions where returning veterans seek care. The primary objective of this study was to examine the association of PTSD and other mental disorders with non-mental health outpatient, inpatient, and emergency service utilization using national data from all returning OEF/OIF veterans who sought care at VA facilities. In addition, we determined whether other factors, such as demographics and military service characteristics, independently predicted increased utilization.
The VA OEF/OIF Roster is a database of veterans who have separated from OEF/OIF military service and have accessed VA healthcare.3 Because our research questions focused on mental health diagnoses associated with OEF/OIF military service, we made exclusions to yield a study population of OEF/OIF veterans who were new users of VA healthcare after the beginning of OEF or OIF. There were 366,417 veterans in the roster with a VA encounter by March 31, 2008. We excluded 36,108 veterans with a first visit prior to October 7, 2001, the date of the US invasion of Afghanistan, and 1,211 veterans who were killed in action during the study period. In addition, to allow all veterans to have at least 1 year of utilization of VA services, we excluded 79,658 veterans who had not had a clinical visit at a VA facility by March 31, 2007. Our final study population consisted of 249,440 separated OEF/OIF veterans who were new users of VA healthcare from October 7, 2001 to March 31, 2007 and who were followed through March 31, 2008. The study was approved by the Committee on Human Research, University of California, San Francisco, and the San Francisco VA Medical Center.
The OEF/OIF Roster includes demographic and military service information for each veteran. Scrambled social security numbers were used to link OEF/OIF Roster data to VA clinical data contained in the VA National Patient Care Database (NPCD) through March 31, 2008. The VA NPCD contains data from outpatient and inpatient visits, including the date of the visit, a code designating the type of visit, and the associated diagnosis(es) classified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. We used ICD-9-CM codes to categorize veterans into three groups: those with no mental health diagnoses, those with mental health diagnoses other than PTSD (290.0–319.0, excluding 309.81), and those with PTSD (309.81) and co-morbid mental health diagnoses (if any).
Our primary outcome was utilization of non-mental health medical services. Therefore, we excluded outpatient visits to mental health services, inpatient visits with a primary code for a mental health diagnosis, and emergency visits with any code for mental health diagnoses. We used VA clinic codes to create seven categories of non-mental health services: primary care, medical/surgical subspecialty, ancillary services, diagnostic tests/procedures, emergency services, total outpatient services (all visits in the preceding categories), and inpatient hospitalizations.
We examined the proportion of veterans accessing each of the service categories over the entire study period (the maximum amount of time a veteran could have been followed was October 7, 2001–March 31, 2008). We then used modified Poisson regression to compare utilization of each service category among the three mental health groups.23 Poisson regression models are used with count data, such as the number of visits per veteran in each service category. These models yielded a relative risk that compares utilization in veterans with mental health diagnoses (PTSD or mental health diagnosis other than PTSD) to those without mental health diagnoses. Adjusted models included age, sex, race, marital status, military component type (active duty vs. National Guard or Reserve), rank (enlisted vs. officer), branch (Army, Air Force, Marines, Navy/Coast Guard), multiple deployments, distance to and type of nearest VA facility (medical center vs. community-based outpatient clinic), and the number of months each veteran was in VA healthcare (calculated from the date of initial VA visit through study end date, March 31, 2008). We also adjusted for VA facility to account for regional patterns in coding or utilization.
During the study period, the VA provided OEF/OIF veterans free military service-related healthcare for 2 years from their date of military service separation (this was recently extended to 5 years in 2008). Following this period of free care, the cost of VA care is based on each veteran’s income and service-related medical conditions. This variation in cost may affect utilization of VA medical services.24 Thus, we also calculated utilization during each veteran’s first year of VA care to reduce differences in utilization based on cost of care. We chose a 1-year period because veterans may not access care immediately after service separation, and thus their period of free VA care may be less than 2 years. Given the greater proportion of zero count data (zero visits) in this shorter time period, negative binomial regression was used instead of modified Poisson regression. This yielded an incidence rate ratio for utilization of each service category. We controlled for the covariates described above excluding number of months in VA healthcare as 12 months of data were included for each veteran. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis with additional adjustment for the number of primary care visits to examine how primary care affected utilization of other types of services. In addition, we controlled for the number of mental health visits in order to explore whether mental health treatment affected utilization.
Finally, we used negative binomial regression to determine independent predictors of outpatient service utilization in each veteran’s first year of care by entering mental health status and all other sociodemographic and military service covariates simultaneously in the model. All analyses were performed using STATA software (version 9.2).
PTSD was the most common mental health diagnosis in the study population (21.5%), followed by depression (18.3%), adjustment disorder (11.1%), anxiety disorder (10.6%), substance use disorder (8.4%), and alcohol use disorder (7.3%). The characteristics of veterans by mental health category are presented in Table 1. Mental health diagnoses other than PTSD were more common in female veterans. PTSD was more common in male veterans and in younger veterans. Veterans of lower rank and those who had served in the Army and Marines were also more likely to be diagnosed with PTSD.
Table 2 shows unadjusted and adjusted utilization of non-mental health services over the entire study period, 2001–2008. In fully adjusted analyses, veterans with mental disorders had significantly greater utilization than veterans without mental disorders in all service categories (all P<0.001). Veterans with PTSD had even greater utilization than those with other mental disorders (all P<0.001). Figure Figure11 shows the median number of visits and the adjusted incidence rate ratios for total outpatient utilization in each veteran’s first year of VA care. Total outpatient utilization was 55% higher in those with mental disorders other than PTSD and 91% higher in veterans with PTSD than in those with no mental health diagnoses. Table 3 compares utilization in each veteran’s first year of VA care. In adjusted analyses, veterans with mental disorders had 42–146% greater utilization than those without mental disorders, depending on the service category (all P<0.001). Those with PTSD had the highest utilization in all categories: 71–170% greater than those without mental disorders (all P<0.001).
Additional adjustment for primary care visits attenuated the results but did not change our conclusions (utilization was 24–112% greater in those with mental health diagnoses and 39–110% greater in those with PTSD). Similarly, after adjustment for mental health visits, those with mental disorders had 38%–132% greater utilization in the various service categories and those with PTSD had 57–128% greater utilization.
Table 4 shows the independent associations of demographic and military service characteristics with total outpatient utilization. After mental health status, female sex, older age, active duty status, and lower rank were associated with the largest increases in utilization.
This is the first national study of VA non-mental health medical service utilization in veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. In this population, those diagnosed with mental disorders had significantly greater utilization of all types of non-mental health outpatient, emergency, and inpatient medical services than those receiving no mental health diagnoses. Veterans diagnosed with PTSD had the greatest utilization in all service categories. In adjusted analyses, compared with those with no mental health diagnoses, total utilization of outpatient non-mental health services was 55% greater in veterans with mental health diagnoses other than PTSD and 91% greater in veterans with PTSD. Though mental health diagnostic status was the strongest independent predictor of utilization, female sex and lower rank were also associated with significantly greater utilization.
The higher rates of utilization among OEF/OIF veterans with mental disorders are notable because this is a relatively young population. The mean age in our study was 31±9 years old, and only 4% were over 50 years of age. Comparing our results to utilization in non-VA populations is challenging because the demographic characteristics and categorization of services differ somewhat. Nevertheless, data from the 2004 United States National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey estimated that men aged 18–44 years (the closest demographic group to our population) had 1.36 general and specialty physician office visits per person.25 In our study, those with no mental health diagnoses had 1.52 primary care or medical/surgical subspecialty visits per year. Thus, VA non-mental health service utilization in OEF/OIF veterans with no mental disorders may approximate that of the general population, underscoring the increased need for veterans with mental disorders.
Our findings expand upon studies of mental disorders and utilization of medical services conducted in veterans of prior wars.11,15–19 In a study of 2,508 female veterans receiving care at an urban VA medical center between 1996 and 2000, Dobie and colleagues found that after adjusting for demographics, smoking, service access, and medical comorbidities, those who screened positive for PTSD had a significantly greater likelihood of having a medical or surgical hospitalization (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04–1.79).11 They were also significantly more likely to be in the highest quartile of utilization for emergency room, primary care, and ancillary services. Another study of 996 veterans, primarily from the Vietnam era, evaluated between 1992 and 1998, demonstrated that those who met criteria for PTSD had significantly greater utilization of non-mental health outpatient services than those without PTSD (median of 18 versus 10 visits per year).15 Other studies have demonstrated that the increase in health services utilization in veterans with PTSD is not due to co-morbid psychiatric conditions, such as anxiety and depression.26,27 Our study adds to this prior research by using national-level data, adjusting for several additional military service characteristics, and exploring utilization in OEF/OIF veterans, a group for which data are very limited.6
There are several possible explanations for our finding of increased utilization of non-mental health services in OEF/OIF veterans with mental disorders, particularly PTSD. First, exposure to combat or other traumatic events that resulted in mental health disorders may have also caused physical problems such as traumatic brain injury or musculoskeletal injuries.20,21 Second, mental disorders are frequently associated with somatic symptoms, and these physical symptoms as well as stigma surrounding mental health issues might prompt patients to seek care in non-mental health clinics.6 Third, mental disorders and PTSD may cause biological and behavioral changes that increase the risk of physical disease, leading to greater medical utilization.28, 29,12–14,30–34 Finally, there may be an increased likelihood of detection of medical problems in veterans with mental health problems, for example, through symptoms identified by mental health providers. Veterans with comorbid mental and physical problems may also be more likely to enroll in primary care, which could lead to increased utilization of other services, such as preventive screening through laboratory and diagnostic tests. However, we explored the influence of mental health and primary care visits in sensitivity analyses and found that these had only a modest effect on utilization.
Beyond mental health status, we examined several sociodemographic and military service characteristics as predictors of utilization. It is unclear whether the gender and racial differences in utilization seen in this study reflect disparities in general health, trauma exposure, preferences for VA care, or access to non-VA care.22,35 Prior studies have demonstrated that military sexual trauma is more common in female veterans and is associated with mental and physical comorbidities.36 Though we did not have data on military sexual trauma, it would be interesting to explore how this impacts gender differences in utilization. Our finding that active duty and lower rank veterans had increased utilization may be explained by the greater exposure to combat-related trauma in these veterans who were likely on the front lines.37 Other factors, such as differential access to private insurance in these generally younger veterans, could also affect utilization of VA care.38
Our results should be interpreted in light of several limitations. First, because we examined only OEF/OIF veterans who have accessed VA care, our findings may not generalize to all OEF/OIF veterans. Examining the effects of mental health conditions on utilization of non-VA services will provide valuable information for the many other systems that provide care to returning veterans. A second limitation is our use of ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes to classify veterans by mental health status. ICD-9-CM codes may be used by clinicians as “rule out” rather than definitive mental health diagnoses. However, in a prior study, we found that the majority of these diagnoses were confirmed on subsequent visits and by mental health providers.3 Still, reliance on ICD-9-CM codes could have led to over- or under-diagnosis of mental health conditions.
Third, because we defined mental health status by diagnoses made over the entire study period, some of a veteran’s utilization may have occurred prior to the date of diagnosis. However, it is well established that due to barriers in seeking and obtaining care, patients typically experience mental health symptoms for years prior to their date of diagnosis.38–40 In addition, we cannot determine the direction of the association between mental disorders and increased non-mental health service utilization. Finally, though our analyses provide information on veterans’ use of VA services, detailed economic analyses and analyses of the VA’s capacity to meet demand for services were beyond the scope of this study.
Despite these limitations, our findings have important implications for healthcare systems that care for returning OEF/OIF veterans and for future research directions. We found that mental health disorders and several demographic and military factors were associated with increased use of outpatient, emergency, and inpatient non-mental health services. As more veterans return home, many with mental and physical injuries, evaluating the capacity of the VA and other healthcare systems to meet these needs will be increasingly important. Future work should also explore how new models of care affect utilization in veterans with comorbid mental and physical health problems. For example, integrating mental health and primary care is a priority in the VA as it can reduce stigma and improve access to mental health treatment. Though such integration of care has been found to improve clinical outcomes, its affect on utilization deserves further study.9 This information could be used to improve the quality and efficiency of care for returning veterans and to guide allocation of resources to ensure the medical needs of the growing veteran population are met.
We acknowledge and thank veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for their service. This study was funded by a VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Career Development Transition Award and a grant from the VA Seattle Epidemiological Research and Information Center. Dr. Cohen was supported by NIH/NCRR/OD UCSF-CTSI grant no. KL2 RR024130. We are grateful for the support of the San Francisco VA Medical Center HSR&D Research Enhancement Award Program (REA 01–097). The manuscript contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or other funding agencies. Preliminary data for this paper were presented as an abstract at the Society of General Internal Medicine 2008 National Meeting.
The authors have no conflicts of interest.