Secreted by the liver
5, hepcidin inhibits intestinal iron absorption and macrophage iron release by decreasing cell surface expression of the iron exporter ferroportin
6. Hepcidin is upregulated by iron administration
5,7–8 and inhibited by anemia
7. Hepcidin deficiency and unchecked ferroportin activity are the common pathogenic mechanisms underlying the genetic iron overload disorder hereditary hemochromatosis
9. Hepcidin is also upregulated by inflammatory cytokines, and hepcidin excess is implicated in the pathogenesis of anemia of inflammation
5,7–8,10–12.
Recently, a role for the BMP signaling pathway in hepcidin regulation was discovered
3–4,13. BMPs are members of the TGF-β superfamily, which is comprised of over forty ligands
14. BMP/TGF-β superfamily ligands initiate an intracellular signaling cascade by binding to a complex of type I and type II serine threonine kinase receptors. The activated receptor complex phosphorylates intracellular Smad proteins, which translocate to the nucleus to modulate gene expression. Reduction of hepatic BMP signaling by a liver-specific conditional knockout of the common BMP/TGF-β intracellular mediator
Smad413, or by mutations in the BMP co-receptor
HFE22–3,15,16, are associated with inappropriately low hepcidin expression and iron overload. We and others have shown that BMP signals positively increase hepcidin expression at the transcriptional level
in vitro3–4,13,17–18. We have also shown that iron administration
in vivo increases hepatic BMP signaling
19, and that BMP administration
in vivo increases hepcidin expression and reduces serum iron
4. Conversely, inhibition of endogenous BMP signaling with soluble hemojuvelin (HJV.Fc) or with the small molecule BMP inhibitor Dorsomorphin inhibits hepcidin expression and increases serum iron
in vivo4,19. Presumably, the mechanism by which HJV.Fc inhibits hepcidin is by binding to endogenously secreted BMP ligands and preventing their interaction with cell-surface signaling receptors
4.
Hemojuvelin (also known as RGMc) is a member of the Repulsive Guidance Molecules family, including RGMa and DRAGON (RGMb), which share 50–60% amino acid identity
20. Like Hemojuvelin, RGMa
21 and DRAGON
22 also bind BMP ligands and function as co-receptors for the BMP signaling pathway. To explore other BMP inhibitors as potential hepcidin lowering agents, we tested whether purified soluble DRAGON fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1 (DRAGON.Fc) inhibited BMP induction of hepcidin expression in a manner similar to HJV.Fc
4. As shown in , DRAGON.Fc significantly inhibited hepcidin promoter induction by BMP-2 or BMP-4, but was less effective in inhibiting BMP-5, BMP-6, or BMP-7, and did not inhibit BMP-9. In comparison with HJV.Fc, DRAGON.Fc was significantly more potent against BMP-2 () and BMP-4 (), but was less potent against BMP-6 (). DRAGON.Fc also inhibited endogenous hepcidin mRNA expression in hepatoma-derived HepG2 cells, where basal hepcidin expression is dependent in part on endogenous BMP-2, BMP-4, and BMP-6 ligands
4 (
Supplementary Fig. 1).
We then tested whether DRAGON.Fc administration affected hepcidin expression and iron metabolism
in vivo. HJV.Fc at a similar dose was used as a positive control. In contrast to HJV.Fc, DRAGON.Fc had no effect on hepatic hepcidin mRNA (), splenic ferroportin (
Supplementary Fig. 2a–b.), serum iron (), serum transferrin saturation, liver iron content, or spleen iron content (
Supplementary Fig. 2c–e) compared with mock treated control mice. Anti-BMP-2 activity in the serum of DRAGON.Fc treated mice was confirmed by the ability of this serum to inhibit BMP-2 induction of hepcidin promoter activity
in vitro compared with serum from mock treated mice (
Supplementary Fig. 2f).
Since DRAGON.Fc had no effect
in vivo despite its higher potency
in vitro as an inhibitor of BMP-2 and BMP-4 compared with HJV.Fc, and since DRAGON.Fc was less potent at inhibiting BMP-6 compared with HJV.Fc, we hypothesized that the BMP-6 inhibiting properties of HJV.Fc are important for its effects as a hepcidin-lowering agent
in vivo. We therefore tested whether a neutralizing BMP-6 antibody affected hepcidin expression and serum iron levels in mice. BMP-6 neutralizing antibody selectively inhibited BMP-6 induced hepcidin promoter activity
in vitro, but had no significant effect on BMP-2, BMP-4, or BMP-9 (). BMP-6 antibody exhibited some inhibitory activity against BMP-7 and to a lesser extent BMP-5 at higher concentrations, but significantly less compared with BMP-6 (). This crossreactivity is not surprising since BMP-6, BMP-7, and BMP-5 have 71–80% amino acid identity and form a subfamily within the BMP ligands
23. To minimize the effects of this cross-reactivity, we used the lowest effective dose of BMP-6 antibody for subsequent
in vivo experiments. Cross-reactivity with BMP-7 was also less of a concern since BMP-7 is not a ligand for hemojuvelin, is not expressed in the liver and is not thought to be an important endogenous hepcidin regulator
4,23. Treatment with BMP-6 antibody at 10 mg/kg for three days significantly reduced hepatic hepcidin mRNA expression by ~50%, and increased serum iron and transferrin saturation compared with mock treated control mice (). As a control, BMP-6 antibody treatment also caused a trend toward reduced hepatic
Id1 mRNA expression, another expected target of BMP-6
21, by ~60% (
Supplementary Fig. 3). Similar results were found with a lower dose of BMP-6 antibody, although this dose was less effective (
Supplementary Fig. 4)
To validate the importance of endogenous BMP-6 in regulating hepcidin expression and iron metabolism
in vivo, we examined 4 and 8 week-old
Bmp6 null mice, which were previously generated by Solloway
et al24. These
Bmp6 null mice were described to have some mild delays in bone formation during development, but no other overt defects were found
24. Compared with wildtype mice, 8-week-old
Bmp6 null mice exhibited significantly reduced hepatic hepcidin mRNA expression by 10-fold, increased splenic ferroportin expression, and increased serum iron with serum transferrin saturation approaching 100% (). Liver iron content was significantly increased in
Bmp6 null mice by 6-fold at four weeks and by 20-fold at eight weeks (
Supplementary Fig. 5a and ). Significant iron accumulation was also evident in the heart and pancreas of
Bmp6 null mice, while spleen iron content was reduced ( and
Supplementary Fig. 5b). The degree of iron overload in the liver of 8 week-old
Bmp6 null mice appears comparable to that reported in
Hfe2−/− mice at a similar age
15–16. Thus,
Bmp6 null mice have a phenotype that resembles mouse models of juvenile hemochromatosis due to loss of the BMP co-receptor hemojuvelin.
To further explore whether BMP-6 is a ligand for hemojuvelin, purified BMP-6 alone, HJV.Fc alone, or the combination of BMP-6 and HJV.Fc were incubated in solution followed by pull-down with Protein A beads. Western blot of eluates with BMP-6 antibody showed that an 18 kDa protein, corresponding to the predicted size of BMP-6 monomer, was pulled down in the presence of HJV.Fc (, arrow). No 18 kDa band was seen from solutions containing BMP-6 alone or HJV.Fc alone (). These data demonstrate a direct interaction between BMP-6 and HJV.Fc.
Next, we examined the ability of exogenous BMP-6 to regulate hepcidin expression and iron metabolism
in vivo. Mice were injected with a single dose of exogenous BMP-6 at 250 and 1000 μg/kg IP. As a positive control, BMP-6 administration significantly increased hepatic
Id1 mRNA expression (
Supplementary Fig. 6). BMP-6 administration also significantly increased hepatic hepcidin mRNA expression (), and caused a dose dependent reduction in serum iron () and serum transferrin saturation ().
Together, these data suggest that BMP-6 is a ligand for hemojuvelin and that BMP-6 is a key endogenous regulator of hepcidin expression and iron metabolism
in vivo. Numerous other BMP ligands have been shown to regulate hepcidin when added exogenously
in vitro or
in vivo, including BMP-2, BMP-4, BMP-5, BMP-7, and BMP-9
3–4,13,17. We have also previously shown that endogenous BMP-2, BMP-4, and BMP-6 all contribute to basal hepcidin expression HepG2 cells
4. Thus, it is not surprising that inhibition of BMP-2 and BMP-4 by DRAGON.Fc inhibits hepcidin expression in these cells. However, it is well-described that cell-based assays do not accurately mirror the
in vivo regulation of hepcidin by iron, since iron increases hepcidin expression
in vivo, but decreases hepcidin expression
in vitro under most conditions
5,10,25. One reason for this discrepancy may be that the complement of BMP ligands and receptors that regulate hepcidin expression
in vitro are different from those that regulate hepcidin expression in response to iron
in vivo. We hypothesize that HJV.Fc and BMP-6 antibody inhibit hepcidin expression
in vivo by binding to endogenously secreted BMP-6 and preventing its interaction with cell-surface signaling receptors. We hypothesize that DRAGON.Fc does not affect hepcidin expression
in vivo because 1) it is a less potent inhibitor of BMP-6 compared with HJV.Fc and does not significantly inhibit BMP-6 at the doses used in this study, and 2) in contrast to the
in vitro experiments, endogenous BMP-2 and BMP-4 ligands do not significantly contribute to hepcidin regulation
in vivo. Indeed, the liver is presumably the source of the endogenous BMPs that regulate hepcidin, and a recent study reported that hepatic
Bmp6 mRNA levels vary concordantly with hepcidin mRNA levels in response to dietary iron content. In contrast,
Bmp2 mRNA levels are only upregulated slightly under extreme iron overload conditions and
Bmp4 mRNA levels are not modulated by dietary iron
26. We also did not find changes in hepatic
Bmp2 and
Bmp4 mRNA levels in
Bmp6 null mice despite significant iron overload (
Supplementary Fig. 7). Interestingly,
Bmp2 and
Bmp4 mRNA were increased in the bone of Bmp6 null mice by 2.5–6-fold (P. Simic, I. Orlic, V. Kufner, and S.V., unpublished data), suggesting that BMP-2 and BMP-4 are differentially regulated in different tissues and may compensate for the loss of BMP-6 function in some tissues, but do not compensate for the lack of BMP-6 to regulate hepcidin expression and iron metabolism.
The
Bmp6 null mice contain a neomycin cassette, raising the possibility that expression of neighboring genes might also be affected, as described in other mouse models
27. The closest neighboring gene to
Bmp6 is the gene encoding thioredoxin domain-containing protein 5 (
Txndc5) separated by 547 base pairs.
Txndc5 mRNA is present in
Bmp6 null mice with similar expression levels compared with wildtype mice as measured by RT-PCR (
Supplementary Fig. 7). Although we cannot rule out small changes in
Txndc5 mRNA levels by this technique, our interventional data showing that BMP-6 administration increases hepcidin and reduces serum iron, while endogenous BMP-6 inhibition reduces hepcidin expression and increases serum iron, lend further support to the hypothesis that it is the loss of BMP-6 that is the major cause of the iron overload phenotype in
Bmp6 null mice.
Our data suggest that selective BMP-6 inhibitors may be effective agents for treating anemia of inflammation due to hepcidin excess. The lack of any other notable phenotype in Bmp6 null mice suggests that a more selective inhibitor may be better tolerated with fewer off-target effects. Additionally, BMP-6-like agonists may be an alternative treatment strategy for managing iron overload disorders in patients resistant to current therapies. Although no human patients with BMP6 mutations have yet been described, our data also suggests that BMP6 mutations or BMP6 gene variants may function as another cause of hereditary hemochromatosis or a modifier of disease penetrance.