A growing body of evidence from human studies and mouse models of IBD has shown that IL-23 promotes acute as well as chronic intestinal inflammation through the induction of a plethora of proinflammatory mediators. Because the vast majority of these studies have used models of large intestinal inflammation, in the present study, we investigated the role of IL-23 using a well-established mouse model of small intestinal inflammation. In this model, peroral infection with T. gondii induces a hyperinflammatory Th1-type immune response characterized by overproduction of IL-12, IL-18, IFN-γ, TNF, and NO leading to small intestinal immunopathology with massive necrosis (panileitis). Although IL-23 has been shown to induce and/or maintain mucosal inflammatory responses via the induction of Th17 cells, we show in this paper that IL-23 caused small intestinal immunopathology via the up-regulation of MMP-2 and, surprisingly, via the induction of IL-22 but in an IL-17–independent way.
The expression and enzymatic activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were enhanced in the small intestine when pathology started to develop. However, only MMP-2–deficient mice were protected against the development of intestinal immunopathology and early death. IL-22 levels in the ileum of WT and MMP-2−/− mice as well as the levels of MMP-2 in the ileum of WT and IL-22−/− mice did not differ between WT and knockout mice, respectively, indicating that IL-22 and MMP-2 mediate T. gondii–induced ileitis through independent pathways.
In accordance with our data, several studies have demonstrated that MMP-2 and MMP-9 are up-regulated during active episodes of IBD in humans as well as in animal models of colitis (
Baugh et al., 1998;
Castaneda et al., 2005;
Yen et al., 2006;
Gordon et al., 2008), and that IL-23 is able to induce their expression (
Ivanov et al., 2007). Epithelial barrier dysfunction may be involved in the MMP-mediated effects in
T. gondii–induced ileitis, because MMP-2
−/− mice showed a lower rate of bacterial translocation into the spleen compared with WT mice (unpublished data). Interestingly, granulocytes have been proposed as an important source of MMPs. We found an increased number of granulocytes in the lamina propria after infection (unpublished data). However, neutrophil depletion in WT mice did not prevent the development of ileitis, and MMP concentrations did not differ after depletion of granulocytes. In addition, IL-22 levels in the ileum were similar in granulocyte-depleted and control mice, suggesting that neutrophils are not a source of IL-22 (unpublished data).
We observed that nonselective (doxycycline) and selective (RO28-3653) gelatinase inhibitors ameliorated intestinal pathology when given either prophylactically or therapeutically. Dosages of RO28-2653 used in the present study were similar to those administered in pharmacodynamic studies in rat and mouse models (
Kilian et al., 2006;
Abramjuk et al., 2007). Although nonselective MMP-blocking agents may cause severe adverse side effects (
Bernardo et al., 2002), RO28-2653 did not show major side effects in rat and monkey toxicological studies (unpublished data).
Moreover, RO28-2653 also blocked large intestinal inflammation in a model of dextran sulfate sodium–induced colitis (unpublished data). Thus, selective blockage of gelatinases may be a safe and effective new strategy in the prevention and treatment of intestinal inflammation.
IL-23 has been proposed to induce pathology through the proliferation and maintenance of IL-17–secreting cells (
Aggarwal et al., 2003;
Bettelli et al., 2007). In contrast, our results demonstrate that the pathogenic role of IL-23 was independent of IL-17 but dependent on IL-22. In agreement with our data, several studies have demonstrated that IL-17 and IL-22 possess distinct roles during immune responses (
Cruz et al., 2006;
Kreymborg et al., 2007;
Schulz et al., 2008;
Sugimoto et al., 2008;
Wolk et al., 2009). Moreover, our study provides strong evidence that IL-22 and IL-17 are inversely regulated in ileitis.
Although IL-22 was up-regulated, IL-17 production was turned off in the ileum of infected mice. High concentrations of IFN-γ in the small intestine of mice might have contributed to the down-regulation of IL-17 production, as previously shown in models of adjuvant-induced arthritis (
Kim et al., 2008) and during mycobacterial infection (
Cruz et al., 2006).
Importantly, we found that IL-23–induced up-regulation of IL-22 was essential for the development of small intestinal immunopathology. IL-22−/− mice did not develop small intestinal necrosis although they harbored the same number of parasites as both WT and IL-17−/− mice. These data support a new pathogenic rather than protective role of IL-22 in the small intestine.
Although IL-22 has been reported to promote psoriasis-like skin alterations (
Wolk et al., 2004;
Wolk et al., 2006;
Zheng et al., 2007;
Ma et al., 2008;
Wolk et al., 2009), an increasing number of studies have reported a rather protective role of IL-22, especially in hepatitis and colitis experimental models (
Zenewicz et al., 2007;
Cella et al., 2008;
Satoh-Takayama et al., 2008;
Sugimoto et al., 2008;
Zenewicz et al., 2008). In regard to intestinal inflammation, IL-22 protected mice from colitis in a CD45RB
hi transfer model (
Zenewicz et al., 2008), and IL-22 deficiency rendered mice susceptible to
Citrobacter rodentium– and dextran sulfate sodium–induced colitis (
Satoh-Takayama et al., 2008;
Zheng et al., 2008). Furthermore, IL-22 induces the expression of antimicrobial peptides in epithelial cells (
Liang et al., 2006;
Aujla et al., 2007;
Zheng et al., 2008).
These contrasting features of IL-22 raise important questions about how the same protein could behave in opposite ways. First, the role of IL-22 in inflammation could be tissue specific. IL-22 might exert pathogenic functions in keratinocytes and epithelial cells of the small intestine while playing a protective role in the large intestinal and lung epithelium, as well as in hepatocytes. Second, IL-22 may exert different functions dependent on its amount and duration in tissues. In the present study, increasing levels of IL-22 in the ileum were found during ileitis, and they peaked at day 8 after infection when intestinal pathology was full blown and mice began to succumb to infection. Third, the diversity of experimental models used (pathogen and chemical induced) may contribute to the contrasting roles of IL-22. At this point, we can only speculate on the potential pathogenic effector mechanisms mediated by IL-22 in the small intestine. Neutralization of IL-22 has recently been reported to block CXCL-8 expression by intestinal epithelial cells after stimulation with T memory cells (
Kleinschek et al., 2009). Lastly, pathogenic IL-22–producing cells might constitute a subpopulation of cells, different from Th17 and NK22 cells. IL-22 production is higher in Th1 cells than in Th17 cells (
Volpe et al., 2008), and a unique IL-22–producing population of NKp46
+RORγt
+ natural killer cells, termed NK22 cells, was identified in the dermis, lamina propria, and other mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues (
Cella et al., 2008;
Luci et al., 2008;
Sanos et al., 2009;
Satoh-Takayama et al., 2008;
Zenewicz et al., 2008). Furthermore, a human Th cell population that secretes IL-22 but not IL-17 nor IFN-γ has been recently reported (
Duhen et al., 2009;
Trifari et al., 2009). In the present study, we used a well-characterized IL-22 mAb (
Zheng et al., 2007) to identify the source of IL-22 after ileitis induction. CD4
+ T cells were the predominant source of IL-22. IL-17 was down-regulated and dispensable for the development of intestinal necrosis. Interestingly, flow cytometry pointed toward non-CD4, non-CD3 T cells as an additional source of IL-22 in the ilea of infected mice. This was confirmed by our finding of IL-22 production in the ileum of RAG1
−/− mice, which do not have T cells, and in supernatants of CD4
− cells sorted from the lamina propria of infected mice. However, flow cytometry did not associate IL-22 production with NK cells, as recently described (
Cella et al., 2008;
Luci et al., 2008;
Sanos et al., 2009;
Satoh-Takayama et al., 2008;
Zenewicz et al., 2008). We cannot formally rule out the presence of NK22 cells, because the mAb used to detect IL-22–producing cells may have failed to detect IL-22 secretion by non–T cells because of a short half-life of IL-22 or a low sensitivity of this mAb. Therefore, we assume that CD4
+ T cells are the main producers of IL-22 but other non–T cells contribute to IL-22 production. In agreement with a previous study, IL-22 production was also dependent on the presence of the normal gut flora, because gnotobiotic mice displayed significantly lower IL-22 concentrations (
Satoh-Takayama et al., 2008).
In conclusion, IL-22 induced by IL-23 but not IL-17 is a key mediator of immunopathology in the small intestine. IL-23 also induced the local up-regulation of MMP-2 that was a crucial downstream effector molecule for the development of small intestinal inflammation that could be effectively inhibited by chemical blockage of gelatinases.