|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The management of coronary patients scheduled for a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), who are receiving one or more antiplatelet drugs, is plenty of controversies. It has been shown that withdrawal of antiplatelet drugs is associated with an increased risk of a thrombotic event, but surgery under an altered platelet function also means an increased risk of bleeding in the perioperative period. Because of the conflict recommendations, this review article tries to evaluate the outcome of different perioperative antiplatelet protocols in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing CABG.
The incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) is high and increasing. First treatment of occlusive coronary disease involves percutaneous revascularization and many times one or more stents placement. Any percutaneous coronary intervention causes trauma to the vessel wall, rendering the endoluminal surface thrombogenic and thus, dual anti-platelet therapy (mostly aspirin and clopidogrel) is currently recommended [1, 2].
When these patients are scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the traditional recommendation has been to stop antiplatelet drugs between 7 to 10 days prior to surgery . But, withdrawal of aspirin in patients with CAD has been associated with a 2 to 4-fold increase in the risk of death and myocardial infarction , being the major independent predictor of stent occlusion [5, 6]. Thus, the anaesthesiologist faces the dilemma of stopping the antiplatelet treatment to avoid bleeding and risking postoperative stent thrombosis, or to maintain the antiplatelet therapy perioperatively to avoid the stent thrombosis, so risking major blood loss and increased transfusion rate.
We lack scientific evidence on the optimum perioperative therapy in such a situation. Because of the conflict recommendations, we undertook this systematic review of the literature to evaluate the outcome of different perioperative antiplatelet protocols in patients with CAD undergoing CABG.
All of them are capable to inhibit platelet function, particularly activation and subsequent aggregation, although they make this effect through different ways showing different antiaggregant power (Table 22) [9, 10]. APD can be classified into four groups:
Actually the field of the indications of use of the APD is being continuously updated. In cardiologic patients, some recent questions of development of the APD deserved to be highlighted:
Then, we face different type of patients who benefit from antiplatelet therapy (Table 33) [15, 16]. From our point of view, we could distinguish two groups: patients with chronic treatment who are scheduled for cardiac surgery and patients who require urgent surgery, most of them with double antiaggregation.
The antiplatelet therapy in patients at high risk of occlusive vascular events reduce the combined outcome of any serious vascular event by about one quarter, non-fatal myocardial infarction by one third, non-fatal stroke by one quarter, and vascular mortality by one sixth (with no apparent adverse effect on other death) . Aspirin has been the most widely studied APD, with doses of 75-150 mg daily at least as effective as higher daily doses. Keeping patients on aspirin prior to surgery may help to attenuate the inflammatory response during the operative period and may also reduce cardiovascular events while awaiting surgery .
As we have previously described, the platelet inhibition achieved with aspirin, although irreversible for target platelets, lasts until a significant pool of new platelets is produced. Nevertheless, a complete recovery of platelet aggregation has been observed by day 3 (in 50% healthy young men)  which seems due in part of a biological platelet aggregation “rebound phenomenon”. In fact, after aspirin discontinuation, the recovery of cyclooxigenase activity may occur rapidly, with a heterogeneous synthesis of thromboxane A2 by fresh platelets , which may have possible hazardous effects in patients with cardiovascular disease . Nevertheless, none of the guidelines support the assessment of platelet reactivity by using point-of-care devices.
Many studies have been recently published describing the cardiovascular risk of perioperative APD withdrawal, most of them in non-cardiac surgery, but we did not find any study comparing the cardiovascular risks of preprocedural APD withdrawal directly against APD continuation. Instead of it, we collect some studies that report the frequency of APD (aspirin) withdrawal preceding acute cardiovascular syndrome (Table 44) [4, 22-24].
Talking about clopidogrel, most guidelines would recommend cessation for 5-7 days before surgery. The CURE study  and its sub-analyses show that cessation of clopidogrel in these patients and for this time period is associated with a 1% increase in the risk of myocardial infarction. In non-surgical patients, with acute coronary artery syndrome, the first 90-day interval after stopping treatment with clopidogrel was associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse events (incidence rate ratio of 1.98) .
There are many clinical studies comparing periprocedural-bleeding risks with and without aspirin. Excluding studies on cardiac surgery, aspirin multiplied baseline-bleeding rate by a factor of 1.5 , although mortalities possibly caused by bleeding occurred only after transurethral prostatectomy  and intracranial neurosurgery .
Focus on cardiac surgery, the results are heterogeneous but there seems to have an increase of bleeding with a tendency to need more transfusion requirements in patients under the effect of aspirin [29-35]. Thus, in a recent systematic review of randomized and observational studies , pre-operative aspirin maintenance was associated with a significant increase in the volume of post-operative bleeding (mean difference 114 ml) and transfusion requirements (mean difference 0.34 units), with not significantly difference in the rates of reoperation; with the subgroup analysis, the authors conclude that this bleeding could be minimized by the use of aspirin doses less than 325 mg/day. Another metanalysis  shows similar results, highlighting that the rate of platelet transfusion was similar in both groups.
Bleeding complications and transfusion requirements could be lower if the CABG surgery is performed off-pump, and patients under the effect of aspirin seems to be at less risk for bleeding or for reoperation due to postoperative haemorrhage , even if aspirin is associated with clopidogrel and not discontinued within 2 days of surgery (no differences with the discontinuation more than 6 days before surgery or between 2 and 5 days before surgery) . Moreover, some articles have associated preoperative aspirin maintenance with a decreased risk of mortality in CABG patients without significant increase in haemorrhage, blood product requirements, or related morbidities , even with aspirin usage within the 5 days preceding surgery .
Thus, some surgical and patients characteristics as older age, smaller body mass index, non-elective cases, 5 or more distal anastomosis are more important risk factors for re-exploration for bleeding after CABG than aspirin ingestion, which is consistent with other previous studies [42, 43].
The other common drugs used as antiplatalet agent are thienopyridines that antagonist irreversibly the platelet adenosine diphosphate. It has showed to increase bleeding after CABG in many articles [44-48], although there is another report in which the maintenance of clopidogrel does not increase bleeding or transfusion requirements . The optimal waiting period after last clopidogrel administration is not known but appears to be at least 5 days before CABG ; if the patient need to be antiaggregated near before cardiac surgery, probably the best option is to use low-dose aspirin perioperatively, once clopidogrel has been discontinued . Finally, it has been published that a combined preoperative treatment with heparin infusion could prevent the increased blood loss associated to the administration of clopidogrel, which may have been attributable to a conservation of coagulation factors, as evidenced by the increased plasma fibrinogen concentrations with combined prophylactic treatment .
Other drugs that have become increasingly common are the intravenous GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist (tirofiban, eptifibate and abciximab). While eptifibatide and tirofiban have a competitive binding and are rapidly cleared, with an almost recovered platelet function in about 4 hours , abciximab causes prolonged and irreversible effect, with inhibition of platelet function and aggregation lasting 24-48 hours . Transfusion of platelets rapidly reverses the inhibitory effects of abciximab , but it is of very little utility during infusion or suddenly after eptifibatide or tirofiban. No data are available in the literature on the impact of tirofiban or eptifibatide treatment on emergency CABG; however their short half-life and short-lasting action after stopping the infusion is a potential advantage for the performance of CABG with reduced risk of bleeding [55-58], so no delay in surgery has been recommended . In patients treated with abciximab, delaying emergency or urgent CABG for 12 hours has been recommend [59, 60], but other authors suggest rapid discontinuation of abciximab infusion and undelayed intervention [61, 62]. In any case, platelet transfusion should be considered only when increased bleeding is encountered (not prophylactically), and only after cessation of cardiopulmonary bypass .
In cardiac surgery, we should also take care of a variety of methods intended to minimize perioperative transfusion: preoperative autologous donation, intra- and postoperative cell salvage, and the use of drugs, such as aprotinin (a protease inhibitor), desmopressin (that induces the release of factor VIIIvW) and tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon-aminocarproic acid (EACA) (that mainly inhibit plasmin binding to fibrin).
Many studies have shown that aprotinin decreased the number of allogenic transfusions after cardiac surgery and the proportion of patients requiring reoperation because of bleeding . Recent publications, however, have questioned the safety of this agent, reporting not only an increase in renal impairment but an increased risk of long-term mortality following CABG surgery [65-67]. The FDA and the EMEA have recently suspended its use, pending of a complete analysis of a randomized prospective trial in Canada (BART trial), which has shown similar results in terms of mortality.
Desmopressin has not shown a statistically significant effect on reducing the proportion of patients receiving transfusion after CABG , but its efficacy seemed to vary depending on the use of aspirin. While some authors have shown that desmopressin reduced the postoperative blood loss and the transfusion requirements in patients treated with aspirin within 7 to 5 days before surgery compared to placebo [68-70], no effect was found in patients treated within 2 days before CABG .
The TXA decreases the portion of patients receiving allogenic blood, but has not statistically significant effect on reoperations because of bleeding , both in on- and in off-pump surgery . This effect is no consistent in all the studies, excluding patients with APD, prophylactic use of TXA did not result in any significant decrease in postoperative bleeding in one study , but reduced postoperative bleeding and fibrinolysis in another . In patients treated with aspirin, the administration of a single dose of TXA (30 mg/kg) immediately before cardiopulmonary bypass significantly reduced postoperative bleeding and inhibited fibrinolysis .
There are very few studies with EACA that have not shown any statistically significant effect .
The current standard of care for perioperative coagulation monitoring consists of a platelet count and prothrombin (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin (aPTT) times, omitting platelet function. However, these routine tests are insensitive predictors of bleeding and perioperative changes in platelet count shows poor correlation with changes in platelet function . It would be helpful in the perioperative management of APD to have a haemostatic test to identify the patients at bleeding risk because of platelet dysfunction related with the administration of any APD.
Several tests could be used to assess the platelet function. Optical platelet aggregometry is considered at present the reference assay for diagnosis of platelet disorders , although it is not completely standardized, the laboratory work up is complex and it is not possible to be performed immediately before the surgery. The Platelet Function Analyser (PFA-100) explores the platelet adhesive capacity, measuring the closure time taken for a platelet plug to occlude an aperture in a membrane impregnated with collagen and epinephrine or ADP ; ASA and clopidogrel have been shown to prolong this closure time, but without evident correlation with a perioperative bleeding. The PlateletworksTM analyser measures the percentage of aggregation of whole blood before and after the exposure to ADP; its results are contradictory when compared with optical aggregometry: good correlation for clopidogrel  but of limited use for ASA . Thromboelastogrphy (TEG) is a whole blood coagulation monitor, which can demonstrate the alteration of platelet aggregation, but is unable to detect the defects that occur with ASA or demonstrate the ADP blockade caused by clopidogrel.
Unfortunately any of these tests has good correlation with perioperative bleeding and further clinical investigations are necessary in this field, although they can help us to reduce the rate of reoperation for bleeding (TEG), in part by helping to differentiate surgical from nonsurgical bleeding , or to improve appropriate platelet transfusion (PFA-100) .
The management of patients under the effect of antiaggregant agents scheduled for cardiac surgery is a major topic of interest and concern for all perioperative caregivers. Many recommendations could be found in the available published papers [8, 13, 14, 36, 37, 51, 82-85] and they could be summarized as follows:
The handicap of management of antiplatelet agents in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery requires close collaboration between cardiologists, surgeons and anaesthesiologists. It is necessary to avoid thrombotic complications maintaining the antiaggregation, but balancing bleeding complications.
Patients treated with long-term APD could be at risk for increased bleeding if it is maintained until surgery, mainly if there are any other outstanding variable as indicator of risk: advanced age, preoperative anaemia, reoperative o complex procedures, emergency operations or non-cardiac patient comorbidities. If the patient is under the effect of one or more of these drugs the associated bleeding risk might be carefully balanced and an alternative antiaggregation protocol could be considered. Moreover, the drugs to minimize bleeding could play an important role and might be in consideration.
The decision to stop the APD some days before surgery faces up to the decision to maintain the treatment up to surgery. The choice for one or the other option should be based on the individual balance between the risk to develop any cardiovascular event if the APD has been withdrawn and the complications associated as result of the major bleeding if the APD has been maintained until the day of the surgery.
Summarising both possibilities and the comments stated above, we know that clopidogrel maintenance prior to cardiac surgery is associated with a more blood product usage, a 2-5 fold increase in the risk of re-exploration and 30-100% increase in the chest drain blood loss. The withdrawal of clopidogrel prior to surgery, between 5 and 7 days, could be associated with a little increase of the risk of myocardial infarction, estimated around 1% while the patient is waiting for surgery . Between patients under aspirin, its withdrawal 2-3 days before surgery could reduce perioperative blood loss, risk for transfusion and reoperation for bleeding. This practice seems safe for patients without acute coronary syndromes, but for urgent cardiac surgery, the risk of perioperative infarction is higher and the balance is favourable to the maintenance of aspirin up to the day of surgery.
So, for patients scheduled for CABG, the recommendation is to stop clopidogrel at least 5 days and, preferably, 10 days prior to surgery to minimize blood loss. In the case of aspirin, the recommendation is to maintain it up to surgery and beyond the time of surgery. But in the case of patients, who are not at high risk for cardiac events, the routine recommendation is to stop aspirin or clopidogrel prior to surgery because of risk of bleeding and morbi-mortality associated in these patients .