PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 June 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2804866
NIHMSID: NIHMS113413

Expression of the K303R Estrogen Receptor α Breast Cancer Mutation Induces Resistance to an Aromatase Inhibitor via Addiction to the PI3K/Akt Kinase Pathway

Abstract

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are rapidly becoming the first choice for hormonal treatment of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. However, de novo and acquired resistance frequently occurs. We have previously identified a lysine to arginine transition at residue 303 (K303R) in ERα in premalignant breast lesions and invasive breast cancers, which confers estrogen hypersensitivity and resistance to tamoxifen treatment. Thus, we questioned whether resistance to AIs could arise in breast cancer cells expressing the ERα mutation. As preclinical models to directly test this possibility, we generated K303R-overexpressing MCF-7 cells stably transfected with an aromatase expression vector. Cells were stimulated with the aromatase substrate, androstenedione (AD), with or without the AI anastrozole (Ana). We found that Ana decreased AD-stimulated growth of WT cells, while K303R-expressing cells were resistant to the inhibitory effect of Ana on growth. We propose that a mechanism of resistance involves an increased binding between the mutant receptor and the p85α regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI3K), leading to increased PI3K activity and activation of protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt survival pathways. Inhibition of the selective “addiction” to the PI3K/Akt pathway reversed AI resistance associated with expression of the mutant receptor. Our findings suggest that the K303R ERα mutation might be a new predictive marker of response to AIs in mutation-positive breast tumors, and that targeting the PI3K/Akt pathway may be a useful strategy for treating patients with tumors resistant to hormone therapy.

Keywords: Estrogen Receptor, Breast Cancer, Aromatase Inhibitors, Hormone Resistance, PI3K/Akt Kinase Pathway

Introduction

Despite the clinical efficacy of the aromatase inhibitors (AIs), many ERα-positive breast tumors initially fail to respond (de novo resistance), or resistance develops during treatment leading to disease progression (acquired resistance). To understand resistance mechanisms, several laboratories have developed in vitro cell lines models to study the molecular changes associated with long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) (15). AI resistance has also been examined using aromatase-overexpressing MCF-7 breast cancer cell line models grown as xenografts in athymic nude mice (6), or breast cancer cells made resistant to AIs via long-term treatment with these drugs (7, 8). These models suggest the hypothesis that resistance to endocrine therapy may be through the acquisition of estrogen hypersensitivity, whereby low subphysiological levels of estrogens remaining after estrogen deprivation are sufficient for maintenance of tumor growth. One unifying feature which has emerged is a retained mitogenic role for ERα (9). Recently, intracellular cross-talk between ERα and several signal transduction pathways have been shown to be associated with endocrine resistance (10, 11).

We have previously identified a frequent somatic mutation at nucleotide 908 of ERα (A908G) in premalignant breast lesions and invasive breast cancers (12, 13). This mutation results in a lysine to arginine transition at residue 303 (termed K303R), that confers hypersensitivity to estrogen (12, 14). We hypothesized that such a mutant could provide a continuous mitogenic stimulus to the breast even during phases of low circulating hormone, such as menopause, thus affording a proliferative advantage especially during treatment with AIs. Here, we present a new model of resistance to endocrine therapy, whereby the expression of the A908G ERα mutation conferred resistance to the AI anastrozole (Ana). We speculate that inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathways may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for hormone-resistant cancers that are “addicted” to these pathways due to mutation of the ERα target.

Materials and Methods

Reagents, hormones and antibodies

17β-estradiol, 4-androstene-3,17-dione and heregulin were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Anastrozole and ICI182,780 were provided by Astrazeneca (Macclesfield, England). PD98059, PI-103, Akt Inhibitor VIII Isozyme-Selective (Akti1/2), and LY294002 were from Calbiochem (Darmstadt, Germany). Exemestane was obtained from Pfizer (New York, NY). Antibodies used for immunoblotting were: ERα (clone 6F11) from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA), Rho GDIα from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Total ERK1,2/MAPK, total Akt, phosphorylated p42/44 ERK1,2/MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204), Akt (Ser473), ERα (Ser167) and poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA); Bax and Bcl-2 from Calbiochem; and Cytochrome P450 Aromatase from Serotec (Oxford, UK); p85 from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Secondary antibodies goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit were obtained from Amersham Bioscences (Piscataway, NJ).

Plasmids

Full-length human aromatase cDNA was amplified from the pCMV6-Arom plasmid (OriGene Technologies, Rockville MD) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the following primers: forward 5’- ACACTAGTATGGTTTTGGAAATGCTGAACCC-3’ and reverse 5’- ACGCGGCCGCCTAGTGTTCCAGACACCTGTCT. This PCR product was subcloned into the SpeI/NotI sites of the pZeoSV2-vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The resulting pZeoSV2-aromatase expression vector (pZeo-Arom) sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing. Generation of yellow-fluorescent protein (YFP)-tagged expression constructs, YFP-WT and K303R-ERα, have been previously described (14).

Cell culture

MCF-7 parental breast cancer cells were cultured as described (14). MCF-7 WT and K303R ERα-expressing cells were generated as described (15). MCF-7 parental and YFP-K303R ERα clones were stably transfected with the pZeo-Arom expression vector using Fugene 6 reagent according to the manufacturer (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). CHO or MCF-7 Arom-expressing pools, stably transfected with YFP-WT ERα and YFP-K303R ERα expression vectors, were also used.

Aromatase activity assay

Aromatase activity was evaluated using a 3H-water release assay using 0.5µM [1β-3H]-androst-4-ene-3,17-dione as substrate (16). The incubations were performed at 37°C for 1h. The results were expressed as fmolpmol/h/mgprotein.

Tumor xenografts

All animal studies were carried out according to the guidelines and with the approval of the Baylor College of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee. Female nude ovariaectomized athymic mice were injected with MCF-7 YFP-WT and YFP-K303R ERα-expressing cells or MCF-7 Arom 1 and K303R Arom 1-expressing cells as described (17). Animals were supplemented with estrogen tubing releasing approximately 80pg/ml, or supplemented daily with injections of the aromatase substrate androstenedione (100µg).

Cell proliferation assays

700 cells were plated into 96-well plates in phenol-red-free MEM containing 5% charcoal-stripped FBS. After 24h, cells were treated as indicated. Nine days later, proliferation was assessed using MTT reagent following the manufacturer. Soft agar anchorage-independent growth assays were performed as previously described; data shown are the mean colony number of three plates and representative of two or three independent experiments (18).

Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analyses

Cells were starved in serum-free MEM for 48h and treated as indicated before lysis (15). For coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we used 500µg of total cellular protein and anti-ERα. (1:50) or anti-p85 (1µg) antisera overnight and protein A/G with rotation at 4°C for 2h. Protein extracts from tumour tissues were prepared by homogenizing the tissue in lysis buffer supplemented with 10% glycerol. Equal amounts of extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE as described (14). Blots shown are representative of two or three individual experiments.

PI3-kinase activity

PI3K was immunoprecipitated from cellular lysates with p85 antibody and the amount of phosphatidylinositol-(3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3) produced was assessed in a competitive ELISA (Echelon Biosciences, Salt Lake City, UT).

ERα transactivation assays

Cells (50000/well) were plated in phenol red-free MEM with 5% charcoal-stripped FBS in 24-well plates, and then cotransfected with 0.5µg of an ERE2-tk-luciferase reporter plasmid, plus 1ng of the respective ERα expression plasmid and 50ng of CMV-β-galactosidase plasmid as an internal control using Fugene 6 reagent. After 6h, cells were treated as indicated for 18–24h. Luciferase activities were determined as described (14).

Apoptosis assays

Cells were seeded into 6-well plates (105 /well) in phenol-red-free MEM with 5% charcoal-stripped FBS for 48h and then incubated with different treatments for 72h. Apoptosis was measured using the Cell Death Detection ELISA Kit (Roche). Data are representative of two independent experiments performed in triplicate.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed by Student’t-test using the GraphPAD Prism5 software program.

Results

The K303R ERα mutation and estrogen hypersensitivity

We have previously described ERα-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells that overexpress either WT ERα or the K303R ERα mutation (15). Cells expressing the K303R ERα mutant receptor expressed a 66kDa endogenous ERα protein, along with a 96kDa receptor representing the exogenously-added mutant tagged with YFP (Fig. 1A). We have demonstrated that K303R ERα mutant overexpression conferred increased sensitivity to estrogen using in vitro growth assays (12). To confirm these findings, we examined the ability of increasing concentrations of estradiol (E2) to induce anchorage-independent growth, which reflects in vivo three-dimensional tumor growth. Basal (−E2) mutant colony number was 2.9-fold higher (Fig. 1B); both cell lines exhibited estradiol-induced dose-response growth. Growth stimulation was not observed with low E2 (10−12M) in parental cells, while low E2 enhanced the growth of mutant-cells.

Figure 1
Characterization of K303R ERα-expressing cells. A. Immunoblotting showing ERα and Rho GDIα (loading control) in MCF-7 parental (MCF-7) and YFP-K303R ERα-cells (MCF-7 K303R). B. Anchorage-independent growth assay in cells ...

To determine if low estrogen might favor the growth of mutant cells, we examined xenografts tumor model. Cells were injected into female mice supplemented with 80pg/ml of estradiol, representing low premenopausal levels (Fig. 1C). K303R ERα-tumors grew faster than the WT ERα tumors (P=0.0466). Thus, expression of the mutant generated an estrogen hypersensitive phenotype in vitro and in vivo.

Expression of the mutation and AI resistance

Estrogen-deprived MCF-7 cell lines (13, 19), and breast cancer cells resistant to aromatase inhibitors (AIR) (6, 7), have been generated; one hypothesis emerging is that resistance may result from adaptive estrogen hypersensitivity or estrogen-independent ERα activation. This hypothesis led us to question if the K303R ERα mutant might play a role in AIR due to its estrogen hypersensitive phenotype.

To test for AIR, cells were stably transfected with an aromatase cDNA expression vector. Fig. 1D shows aromatase protein levels in a vector control clone (MCF-7 V), one clone stably expressing aromatase (MCF-7 Arom 1), and two clones co-expressing the YFP-K303R mutant ERα along with aromatase (K303R Arom 1 and 2). These cells overexpressed aromatase protein and activity at about 1000 times more than vector control cells (0.032 vs. 29–65pmol/h/mgprotein).

We next evaluated proliferative responses in anchorage-independent assays (Fig. 1E). K303R Arom 1-expressing cells exhibited significantly enhanced control growth compared to WT ERα MCF-7 Arom 1-expressing cells, and growth was further increased by AD treatment. MCF-7 Arom 1 and K303R Arom 1 cells were also injected into mice to monitor xenograft growth; a significant increase in the growth of AD-treated mutant tumors was seen (Fig. 1F).

To investigate whether the mutant hypersensitive phenotype could cause AIR, we examined the effects of the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (Ana) on cell growth (Fig. 2A). Growth of MCF-7 vector (V) cells was significantly enhanced by E2, but as expected they did not respond to AD treatment. AD treatment enhanced growth to the same extent as E2 in MCF-7 Arom 1 cells, as well as K303R Arom 1-expressing cells. Ana treatment decreased AD-stimulated growth at about 40% in MCF-7 Arom 1-expressing cells, but had no effect on the growth of the mutant cells.

Figure 2
K303R ERα mutation confers resistance to anastrozole. A. MTT growth assays in cells treated with vehicle, E21nM, AD10nM and/or anastrozole (Ana100nM, 1µM, 10µM). Cell proliferation is expressed as fold change relative to vehicle-treated ...

To extend the MTT data, we performed anchorage-independent soft agar growth assays (Fig. 2B). E2 and AD treatments enhanced colony numbers, and treatment with Ana completely abrogated AD-stimulated growth of MCF-7 Arom 1 cells. In contrast, basal colony number was increased ~10-fold in K303R Arom 1 and 2 clones, and Ana was unable to inhibit AD-induced colony growth.

Because it was possible that overexpression of exogenous ERα alone might stimulate cell growth and contribute to the AIR phenotype, we also transfected MCF-7 Arom 1-expressing cells with an expression vector for YFP-WT ERα. Aromatase and exogenous YFP-ERα levels are shown (Fig. 2C, top panel). Pools expressing exogenous WT or mutant receptor were evaluated in soft agar assays (Fig. 2C, bottom panel). The basal growth of K303R ERα–Arom pools (P) was significantly higher than WT pools. Inhibition of aromatase activity by Ana caused a significant reduction in AD-stimulated growth in WT ERα Arom cells, but Ana was unable to reduce AD-stimulated mutant cells growth, confirming our stably transfected clones results. In the mutant pool AD+Ana stimulated growth compared to AD treatment alone, which may be a variable clonal effect. We also generated stable pools of YFP-tagged ERα in ER-negative, aromatase-positive CHO cells (Fig. 2D). Ana did not reverse AD-stimulated growth in CHO-mutant cells, confirming that the AIR phenotype was associated with expression of the mutant in a number of different cellular backgrounds. We also examined whether there was cross-resistance to the nonsteroidal AI exemestane (Exe) (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Exe treatment decreased AD-stimulated growth of mutant cells, although Exe was unable to reduce their high basal non-stimulated growth. Aromatase activity was effectively reduced by both Ana and Exe treatment (Supplementary Fig. 1B). We are currently examining the mechanism(s) associated with the partial response to Exe in mutant-expressing cells.

K303R ERα aromatase cells exhibit enhanced PI3K/Akt signaling

Previous studies have revealed the importance of increased MAPK activity and/or PI3K signalling in the adaptation of ERα-positive cells to long-term estrogen deprivation or AI treatment (14, 6). To explore mechanisms underlying the mutant AIR, we focused on short-term signaling events. Cells were treated with increasing AD concentrations (Fig. 3A) for different times (Fig. 3B). MCF-7 Arom 1 cells showed a low basal level of pAkt that was increased in a dose and time-dependent manner by AD treatment. In contrast, mutant cells showed elevated constitutive pAkt that was not further increased by AD; no changes in phospho-p42/44 ERK1,2/MAPK levels were seen (data not shown). pAkt levels were also increased ~4-fold in mutant tumor xenografts compared with MCF-7 Arom 1-overexpressing tumors (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3
Mutant cells exhibited constitutive pAkt. A-F. Immunoblotting showing phospho-Akt (pAkt), Akt and Rho GDIα in cells treated with vehicle or AD 1, 10, 25 and 50nM (1h, A) or AD 10, 30, 60, 120min (10nM, B) or heregulin2ng/ml (H 5min, B); in xenograft ...

We next investigated the expression and activation of Akt in cells treated with Ana (Fig. 3D). MCF-7 Arom-1 cells showed slightly increased levels of pAkt following AD treatment that was reduced with Ana cotreatment, while K303R Arom 1 and 2-expressing cells showed elevated constitutive pAkt that was unaffected by Ana. It has been shown that treatment with the antiestrogen ICI182,780 leads to a rapid down-regulation in ERα levels (20); there were no changes in pAkt with short-term treatment (Fig. 3E). Treatment with ICI182,780 (1–48h) reduced ERα levels in MCF-7 Arom 1, but not basal pAkt; in contrast ICI treatment resulted in a decrease in pAkt levels in mutant cells, concomitant with a reduction in YFP-ERα levels (Fig. 3F). This suggests that activation of pAkt may be related to nongenomic activities of the mutant receptor, as short-term treatments did not block Akt phosphorylation, but are known to block ERα’s genomic activities (21).

ERα can bind to the p85α regulatory subunit of PI3K and activate PI3K/Akt signaling in cells (22). We have previously shown that the mutant ERα receptor exhibits altered binding with several nuclear receptor coregulatory proteins, such as the TIF-2 coactivator, and for the ERBB2 (HER2) oncogene when compared with WT ERα (12, 18). We next examined whether the mutation might alter binding with the PI3K subunit p85, and alter PI3-kinase activity. ER-negative CHO cells were transiently transfected with YFP-tagged receptors, and coimmunoprecipitation studies performed. Enhanced binding of the p85 subunit to mutant receptor in the absence of ligand was observed (Fig. 4A). Equal amounts of lysates of CHO transfected cells (CHO+ WT or K303R) or stable pools (CHO WT or K303R P; Fig 4B) were immunoprecipitated with an anti-p85 antibody, and kinase activity determined. Mutant ERα either transiently expressed or in stable pools significantly induced PI3K activity. We also performed an in vitro PI3K assay in our stably transfected MCF-7 clones, and found constitutively increased PI3K activity in the mutant cells, that was abrogated by PI3K inhibitor LY294002 treatment (Fig. 4C). We also detected elevated constitutive pAkt in CHO cells transiently or stably expressing the mutant receptor (Fig. 4D). These data support a mechanism whereby enhanced binding of the regulatory subunit of PI3K results in enhanced downstream Akt signaling in the mutant cells.

Figure 4
Mutant cells showed increased PI3K/Akt activation. A. Lysates from CHO cells transiently transfected with WT or K303R ERα were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-p85 or anti-ERα and immunoblotted for ERα or p85. Input: whole-cell ...

Phosphorylation of ERα by a number of kinases is an important mechanism by which ERα activity can be regulated (2325). Akt kinase phosphorylates ERα at serine (S) 167. Increased levels pS167 YFP-ERα were found in K303R mutant cells (Fig. 4D) and the mutant increased ERE-transcriptional activity ~8 fold (Fig. 4E). ERE-activity was inhibited by treatment with either the PI3K inhibitor LY294002, or the antiestroogen ICI182,780. Thus, Akt may serve as a functional link between non-genomic and genomic ERα activities, engaging in a bidirectional cross-talk that may set up a vicious cycle between these two growth regulatory pathways and augment signaling between them.

K303R ERα-aromatase cells exhibited altered apoptotic responses

Akt/PKB signaling is involved in the control of survival and apoptosis (26, 27), and AIs induce cell death by apoptosis (28). This suggestion led us to question if the K303R ERα mutation could protect cells from apoptosis induced by Ana, providing these cells with a potential survival advantage. We first evaluated PARP proteolysis, and found a reduction in the basal levels of the proteolytic form of PARP (85kDa) in mutant cells under control conditions (Fig. 5A). AD treatment reduced its levels in a time-dependent fashion in WT and mutant cells, but this reduction was less pronounced in WT cells. E2 was able to reduce PARP-cleavage levels only in mutant cells, suggesting that reduced apoptosis may underlie their hypersensitivity. Ana treatment of MCF-7 Arom 1-expressing cells increased proteolysis compared to AD treatment; cleavage was unchanged in mutant cells (Fig. 5B). In addition, we found an increase in the Bcl-2/Bax ratio in K303R Arom 1-expressing cells, which was further increased with AD and Ana treatments (Figs. 5C,D).

Figure 5
Altered apoptotic response in mutant cells. A-C. Immunoblotting showing PARP and Rho GDIα in cells treated with vehicle, E21nM (24h), AD10nM (12, 24 and 48h, A) or AD10nM and AD+Ana1µM (24h, B); Bcl-2, Bax and Rho GDIα in cells ...

To determine the levels of cellular apoptosis, we also used Elisa cell death detection assays (Fig. 5E), and found that AD-stimulated mutant cells exhibited a lower apoptosis compared to MCF-7 Arom 1-expressing cells, suggesting that the proliferative advantage provided by the mutation may be achieved by a decreased apoptotic response of these cells. In addition, Ana treatment induced an increase in cell apoptosis only in MCF-7 Arom 1 cells. We hypothesize that mutant-expressing cells are resistant to AI-induced cellular apoptosis.

The AIR phenotype is dependent on the PI3K/Akt pathway

We next addressed whether activated PI3K/Akt signaling may be a functional mechanism of resistance to AI therapies using PI3K/Akt inhibitors. To define the effective dose, mutant cells were treated with different doses of these agents and analyzed for pAkt. LY 10µM, PI-103 1µM, Akti1/2 1µM effectively blocked basal Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 6A). We then performed soft agar growth assays. LY completely inhibited mutant proliferation, whereas it induced a slight reduction in the growth of MCF-7 Arom 1 cells (Fig. 6B). Similar results were obtained using the PI-103 inhibitor in another mutant clone (K303R Arom 2, data not shown). Since PI3K inhibitors affect not just all three Akt isozymes, but also other PH domain-containing molecules (29), we tested a specific Akt inhibitor, Akti1/2 (Fig. 6C), and found that basal, AD- and Ana-stimulated growth was inhibited by ~30% in MCF-7 Arom 1-expressing cells, while growth was inhibited by >90% in mutant cells. These results suggest that Akt signaling is essential for the growth of mutant cells, but may not play an important role in the growth of WT cells.

Figure 6
Inhibition of PI3K/Akt pathway reversed AIR. A. Immunoblotting showing phospho-Akt and Akt in cells treated with vehicle, LY10µM or PI-103 (1, 5, 10µM) or Akti1/2 (1, 5, 10µM) for 30min. B-D. Anchorage-independent growth assay ...

We also used a MEK1 inhibitor (PD98059) in soft agar assays (Fig. 6D); antiproliferative effects were not observed and PD treatment was unable to reverse the AIR mutant phenotype. These results confirm that the p44/42 Erk1,2/MAPK pathway was not involved in the AIR mutant phenotype. We also used ICI182,780, and it suppressed colony growth of both cell lines, indicating that ERα expression remained important in their growth regulation (Fig. 6D).

We next evaluated the effects of the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 on apoptosis using an Elisa cell death detection assay (Fig. 6E), and found that LY treatment in MCF-7 Arom 1 cells showed similar apoptosis induction as Ana-treated cells (1.7-fold increase), while inhibitor treatment of mutant cells was able to induce a 3.6-fold increase in the apoptotic rate compared to AD, and most significantly after Ana treatment. We conclude that the mutation provides a selective dependency on the PI3K/Akt survival pathway for sustained proliferation and/or survival. We suggest that inhibition of this potential pathway addiction may provide an effective means to reverse AIR associated with expression of the K303R ERα mutation.

Discussion

Despite significant advances in the treatment of breast cancer following the introduction of the AIs (30, 31), de novo and acquired resistance remains a major clinical concern. Here we report that expression of the K303R ERα mutant conferred resistance to the AI anastrozole, and show that resistance occurs through a constitutive activation of the PI3K/Akt prosurvival signaling pathway to which the mutant cells have become “addicted” for maintenance of growth.

Breast cancer cells can adapt in response to the selective pressures exerted by exposure to estrogen deprivation therapy by developing enhanced sensitivity to the proliferative effects of low estrogen levels (32). A number of laboratories have developed in vitro models with long-term estrogen deprivation (15), and they propose a dynamic interplay between growth factor signaling and ERα action. Letrozole resistance involves crosstalk between the HER2 growth factor receptor pathway and ERα, leading to activation of Erk1,2/MAPK and ERα phosphorylation (6). Herein we show that a naturally-occurring mutation of ERα, termed K303R, conferred hypersensitivity to estradiol, and demonstrate that the mutant ERα in aromatase-expressing cells exhibited enhanced growth in basal conditions, as well as with AD treatment. We found that the hypersensitive phenotype associated with mutant expression resulted in the acquisition of resistance to the AI anastrozole. The growth of mutant cells was suppressed by fulvestrant treatment, indicating that ERα remained essential for growth.

There is extensive evidence to support the role of HER2 as a mediator of resistance to endocrine therapy (33), but we did not detect increased HER2 levels in our aromatase-overexpressing mutant cells (data not shown), highlighting the uniqueness of our resistance model. K303R ERα-expressing cells exhibited constitutive activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and increased binding to the p85α regulatory subunit of PI3K that led to increased PI3K activity and downstream Akt phosphorylation. The increased levels of phospho-Akt in mutant-expressing cells were associated with a specific increase in ERα pS167, a known Akt phosphorylation site. In agreement with these data, we found that the mutant had enhanced transcriptional activation, which was inhibited by treatment with either the PI3K inhibitor LY294002, or the antiestrogen ICI182,780. This suggests that Akt may serve as a functional link between both cytoplasmic and nuclear ERα functions, resulting in an integrated bidirectional signaling that promoted and sustained proliferation of mutant cells. Despite the extensive disruption in the genome of cancer cells (34, 35), there are examples whereby the reversal of only one or a few of these abnormalities can profoundly inhibit the cancer growth (36). PI3K/Akt inhibition drastically inhibited the growth of mutant cells suggesting an exquisite “dependency” of the mutant cells on the PI3K/Akt pathway for maintenance of AIR.

It has been reported that estrogen deprivation, antiestrogen, or AI treatment induced apoptotic cell death (28, 37). We found a lower frequency of apoptosis in AD-stimulated K303R ERα-expressing cells, suggesting an altered apoptotic response in these cells. In addition, Ana treatment induced a significant increase in cell apoptosis in WT cells, but no changes were observed in the apoptotic response of mutant-expressing cells. It has been proposed that Bcl-2:Bax protein ratios may determine whether a cell will undergo apoptosis (38). We found an increased Bcl-2/Bax ratio in the mutant cells that was further increased after AD and Ana treatments, confirming a potential survival advantage for the mutant receptor cells.

There are relatively few mutations which have been reported in the ERα gene, surprising since many clinical resistance mechanisms involve mutation of the target. The K303R ERα mutation was associated with poor outcomes in univariate analyses, and its presence was correlated with older age, larger tumor size, and lymph node-positive disease, all factors associated with worse outcomes (13). Four other studies did not detect the mutation in invasive cancers (3942), but our studies suggest that the detection method used might be insensitive. However, the K303R mutation has been reported, but at low frequency in invasive breast tumors by Conway et al. (43). Molecular analyses have shown that the mutated arginine at the 303 position allows ERα to be more highly phosphorylated by protein kinase A (PKA) (14) and Akt kinase signaling (our unpublished data). We have previously shown that overexpression of the K303R ERα mutation in ERα-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells conferred estrogen hypersensitivity in vitro (12, 14), and decreased sensitivity to tamoxifen treatment when engaged in crosstalk with growth factor receptor signaling (18). Here, we provide a unique model of endocrine resistance, whereby expression of the K303R ERα mutant receptor conferred resistance to the AI anastrozole. The potential mechanisms of resistance include cellular strategies to evade apoptosis, and increased proliferation through an enhanced cross-talk between the mutant receptor and the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

There are two major clinical implications of our study. First, since K303R mutant cells may escape from growth inhibition when treated with AIs, genetic assays for the mutation might offer a new predictive marker for hormonal response. Second, these data support the development of treatment strategies utilizing signal transduction inhibitors, which may be used to extend the duration of sensitivity to estrogen deprivation, or to reverse resistance at its time of emergence.

Supplementary Material

Sup

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NCI RO1 CA72038 to SAWF, and Department of Defense Fellowship DAMD17-03-1-0417 to MHH.

Financial Support: NIH grants CA72038 to SAWF and DAMD17-03-1-0417 to MHH.

References

1. Shim WS, Conaway M, Masamura S, et al. Estradiol hypersensitivity and mitogen-activated protein kinase expression in long-term estrogen deprived human breast cancer cells in vivo. Endocrinology. 2000:396–405. 1999/12/30 ed; [PubMed]
2. Martin LA, Farmer I, Johnston SR, Ali S, Marshall C, Dowsett M. Enhanced estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, ERBB2, and MAPK signal transduction pathways operate during the adaptation of MCF-7 cells to long term estrogen deprivation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:30458–30468. [PubMed]
3. Sabnis GJ, Jelovac D, Long B, Brodie A. The role of growth factor receptor pathways in human breast cancer cells adapted to long-term estrogen deprivation. Cancer Res. 2005;65:3903–3910. [PubMed]
4. Staka CM, Nicholson RI, Gee JM. Acquired resistance to oestrogen deprivation: role for growth factor signalling kinases/oestrogen receptor cross-talk revealed in new MCF-7X model. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005;12 Suppl 1:S85–S97. [PubMed]
5. Murphy CS, Meisner LF, Wu SQ, Jordan VC. Short-and long-term estrogen deprivation of T47D human breast cancer cells in culture. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989;25:1777–1788. [PubMed]
6. Jelovac D, Sabnis G, Long BJ, Macedo L, Goloubeva OG, Brodie AM. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in xenografts and cells during prolonged treatment with aromatase inhibitor letrozole. Cancer Res. 2005;65:5380–5389. [PubMed]
7. Masri S, Phung S, Wang X, et al. Genome-wide analysis of aromatase inhibitor-resistant, tamoxifen-resistant, and long-term estrogen-deprived cells reveals a role for estrogen receptor. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4910–4918. [PubMed]
8. Chen S, Masri S, Wang X, Phung S, Yuan YC, Wu X. What do we know about the mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;102:232–240. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Johnston SR, Head J, Pancholi S, et al. Integration of signal transduction inhibitors with endocrine therapy: an approach to overcoming hormone resistance in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9 524S–32S. [PubMed]
10. Kurokawa H, Arteaga CL. Inhibition of erbB receptor (HER) tyrosine kinases as a strategy to abrogate antiestrogen resistance in human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7 4436s–42s; discussion 11s–12s. [PubMed]
11. Schiff R, Massarweh SA, Shou J, Bharwani L, Mohsin SK, Osborne CK. Crosstalk between estrogen receptor and growth factor pathways as a molecular target for overcoming endocrine resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10 331S–6S. [PubMed]
12. Fuqua SA, Wiltschke C, Zhang QX, et al. A hypersensitive estrogen receptor-alpha mutation in premalignant breast lesions. Cancer Res. 2000;60:4026–4029. [PubMed]
13. Herynk MH, Parra I, Cui Y, et al. Association between the estrogen receptor alpha A908G mutation and outcomes in invasive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3235–3243. [PubMed]
14. Cui Y, Zhang M, Pestell R, Curran EM, Welshons WV, Fuqua SA. Phosphorylation of estrogen receptor alpha blocks its acetylation and regulates estrogen sensitivity. Cancer Res. 2004;64:9199–9208. [PubMed]
15. Herynk MH, Beyer AR, Cui Y, et al. Cooperative action of tamoxifen and c-Src inhibition in preventing the growth of estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:3023–3031. [PubMed]
16. Lephart ED, Simpson ER. Assay of aromatase activity. Methods Enzymol. 1991;206:477–483. [PubMed]
17. Osborne CK, Coronado-Heinsohn EB, Hilsenbeck SG, McCue BL, Wakeling AE, McClelland RA. Comparison of the effects of a pure steroidal antiestrogen with those of tamoxifen in a model of human breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:746–750. [PubMed]
18. Giordano C, Cui Y, Barone I, et al. Growth factor-induced resistance to tamoxifen is associated with a mutation of estrogen receptor alpha and its phosphorylation at serine 305. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 [PubMed]
19. Nicholson RI, Staka C, Boyns F, Hutcheson IR, Gee JM. Growth factor-driven mechanisms associated with resistance to estrogen deprivation in breast cancer: new opportunities for therapy. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004;11:623–641. [PubMed]
20. Pink JJ, Jordan VC. Models of estrogen receptor regulation by estrogens and antiestrogens in breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2321–2330. [PubMed]
21. Dauvois S, White R, Parker MG. The antiestrogen ICI 182780 disrupts estrogen receptor nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. J Cell Sci. 1993;106(Pt 4):1377–1388. [PubMed]
22. Simoncini T, Hafezi-Moghadam A, Brazil DP, Ley K, Chin WW, Liao JK. Interaction of oestrogen receptor with the regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase. Nature. 2000;407:538–541. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Joel PB, Smith J, Sturgill TW, Fisher TL, Blenis J, Lannigan DA. pp90rsk1 regulates estrogen receptor-mediated transcription through phosphorylation of Ser-167. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:1978–1984. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Sun M, Paciga JE, Feldman RI, et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH Kinase (PI3K)/AKT2, activated in breast cancer, regulates and is induced by estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) via interaction between ERalpha and PI3K. Cancer Res. 2001;61:5985–5991. [PubMed]
25. Castano E, Vorojeikina DP, Notides AC. Phosphorylation of serine-167 on the human oestrogen receptor is important for oestrogen response element binding and transcriptional activation. Biochem J. 1997;326(Pt 1):149–157. [PubMed]
26. Song G, Ouyang G, Bao S. The activation of Akt/PKB signaling pathway and cell survival. J Cell Mol Med. 2005;9:59–71. [PubMed]
27. Kim D, Dan HC, Park S, et al. AKT/PKB signaling mechanisms in cancer and chemoresistance. Front Biosci. 2005;10:975–987. [PubMed]
28. Thiantanawat A, Long BJ, Brodie AM. Signaling pathways of apoptosis activated by aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens. Cancer Res. 2003;63:8037–8050. [PubMed]
29. DeFeo-Jones D, Barnett SF, Fu S, et al. Tumor cell sensitization to apoptotic stimuli by selective inhibition of specific Akt/PKB family members. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005;4:271–279. [PubMed]
30. Swain SM. Aromatase inhibitors--a triumph of translational oncology. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2807–2809. [PubMed]
31. Howell A. Adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer. Lancet. 2005;366:431–433. [PubMed]
32. Masamura S, Santner SJ, Heitjan DF, Santen RJ. Estrogen deprivation causes estradiol hypersensitivity in human breast cancer cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:2918–2925. [PubMed]
33. Laurentiis De, Arpino M, Massarelli G, et al. A meta-analysis on the interaction between HER-2 expression and response to endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:4741–4748. [PubMed]
34. Sjoblom T, Jones S, Wood LD, et al. The consensus coding sequences of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science. 2006;314:268–274. [PubMed]
35. Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith R, et al. Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature. 2007;446:153–158. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Weinstein IB, Joe AK. Mechanisms of disease: Oncogene addiction--a rationale for molecular targeting in cancer therapy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006;3:448–457. [PubMed]
37. Kyprianou N, English HF, Davidson NE, Isaacs JT. Programmed cell death during regression of the MCF-7 human breast cancer following estrogen ablation. Cancer Res. 1991;51:162–166. [PubMed]
38. Weinstein IB, Begemann M, Zhou P, et al. Disorders in cell circuitry associated with multistage carcinogenesis: exploitable targets for cancer prevention and therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:2696–2702. [PubMed]
39. Tebbit CL, Bentley RC, Olson JA, Jr, Marks JR. Estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) mutant A908G is not a common feature in benign and malignant proliferations of the breast. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2004;40:51–54. [PubMed]
40. Tokunaga E, Kimura Y, Maehara Y. No hypersensitive estrogen receptor-alpha mutation (K303R) in Japanese breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;84:289–292. [PubMed]
41. Davies MP, O'Neill PA, Innes H, Sibson DR. Hypersensitive K303R oestrogen receptor-alpha variant not found in invasive carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7 R113-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Zhang Z, Yamashita H, Toyama T, et al. Estrogen receptor alpha mutation (A-to-G transition at nucleotide 908) is not found in different types of breast lesions from Japanese women. Breast Cancer. 2003;10:70–73. [PubMed]
43. Conway K, Parrish E, Edmiston SN, et al. The estrogen receptor-alpha A908G (K303R) mutation occurs at a low frequency in invasive breast tumors: results from a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:R871–R880. [PMC free article] [PubMed]