PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Org Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 January 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2804749
NIHMSID: NIHMS163864

Dynamic Kinetic Resolution During a Vinylogous Payne Rearrangement: A Concise Synthesis of the Polar Pharmacophoric Subunit of (+)-Scyphostatin

Abstract

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-163864-f0001.jpg

The diastereomeric epoxycyclohexenols 3a/b (obtained via a Wharton rearrangement of a bis-epoxycyclohexanone precursor) were shown to undergo interconversion via a facile vinylogous Payne rearrangement. Mechanistic issues were probed; the doubly O-deuterated analogs underwent this equilibration more slowly than the parent dihydroxy compounds. It was possible to kinetically resolve the mixture of 3a/b under equilibrating conditions by use of Amano PS. This DKR is additionally noteworthy because it sets four stereocenters in a single event.

Scyphostatin (1) is regarded as the most specific and potent inhibitor (IC50=1.0 μM) of neutral sphingomyelinase, an encouraging pharmacological target for treating inflammation and immunological and neurological disorders.1 As can be seen from its structure (Figure 1), scyphostatin (1) features two principal moieties: a densely functionalized epoxycyclohexenone polar core and an unsaturated fatty acid side chain. The biological activity of scyphostatin is believed to be associated with its epoxyenone headgroup.2 That fact, coupled with the unusual structure of this pharmacophore, has motivated many synthetic efforts.3

Figure 1
Structure of (+)-Scyphostatin (1).

Here we report a dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) that is coupled to a reversible (and rare4) vinylogous Payne rearrangement (cf. graphical abstract above). The DKR was achieved using a lipase (Amano PS) as the chiral discriminator to generate a product–9a–that contains many of the constitutional and configurational features of (+)-scyphostatin (1).5

Our analysis (Scheme 1) of the scyphostatin core revealed that it might be formed from a protected amino alcohol like the Troc-acetonide 2 (Troc = Cl3CCH2OCO). We hoped to make the epoxycyclohexenone 2 via an oxidative DKR of the pseudoenantiomers 3a and 3b, under conditions where the stereoisomers would equilibrate via a vinylogous Payne rearrangement (see curly arrows, Scheme 1). If successful, such a DKR would be significant because it would establish four stereocenters in one step. The mixture of allylic alcohols 3 could arise from the Wharton rearrangement of the diepoxide 4, another example of a rarely seen transformation.6 We envisioned that the syn-diepoxide 4 could be made by oxidative dearomatization of the L-tyrosine derivative 5 followed by bis-epoxidation cis to the tertiary hydroxyl group.7

Scheme 1
Plan for Synthesis of the Polar Subunit of (+)-Scyphostatin (1).

The synthesis commenced with oxidative dearomatization of the phenol 5 using phenyliodine diacetate (PIDA) to provide the dienone 6 in 52% yield (Scheme 2). Alternatively, singlet oxygen oxidation of 5 under basic conditions followed by reduction with DMS also gave the dienone 6 in a similar yield (45%).8

Scheme 2
Synthesis of the Allylic Alcohols 3.

Epoxidation of the dienone 6 with H2O2/NaOH produced the diepoxide 4 as a single diastereomer,7 and treatment with hydrazine to effect Wharton rearrangement gave a nearly 1:1 ratio of the allylic alcohols 3a and 3b (30-40% over two steps). It is noteworthy that sequential application of a set of such elementary reagents as 1O2, H2O2/NaOH, and NH2NH2 affords a product having the molecular complexity of 3a/b from a simple phenolic precursor.

The allylic alcohol diastereomers 3a and 3b were separated by HPLC (SiO2). The equilibration of each of these isolated diastereomers back to a mixture of 3a and 3b would implicate a vinylogous Payne rearrangement. This equilibration occurred slowly upon heating (80 °C) in deuterated solvents [CDCl3 and d6-acetone (Scheme 3, top)]. An ca. 1:1 ratio of 3a and 3b was reestablished after heating for 3 days (half life ca. 1 day).

Scheme 3
Vinylogous Payne Rearrangement of 3a/b.

Since this equilibration occurred under such mild (and essentially neutral) conditions, we wondered if the tertiary alcohol could be acting as an intramolecular H-bond donor to the epoxide in 3,9 thus lowering the activation barrier of this vinylogous Payne rearrangement. Intramolecular proton-shuttling through a locally symmetrical transition state geometry like 7 (Scheme 3, bottom) was an attractive conceptualization of the process.10 This mechanistic thinking was probed by comparing the rate of rearrangement of 3a versus its deuterated analog. Thus, parallel experiments were performed in which diastereomerically pure 3a was heated in acetone containing ca. 7 vol% H2O vs. D2O; reaction progress of each was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Indeed, the D2O sample equilibrated at roughly half the rate of the H2O sample, supporting the view that O-H bond cleavage is involved in the rate limiting event. Also, the rate of equilibration of the H2O-spiked acetone reaction mixture was very similar to that when no H2O was added, suggesting that this change in medium did not appreciably alter the operative mechanism.

With the viability of the vinylogous Payne rearrangement established, we proceeded to study a DKR that would selectively drain one of 3a or 3b from the equilibrating mixture. We first examined an oxidative resolution strategy, which would have provided the epoxycyclohexenone core of scyphostatin (cf. 2, Scheme 4) directly. Unfortunately, none of the asymmetric oxidative methods of Noyori,11a Sigman,11b or Xia11c proved effective. We successfully used the Noyori conditions to oxidize the simple allylic alcohol (±)-8a to enone 8b [5 mol% p-cymene•RuTsDPEN; progress slowed substantially at ca. 50% conversion (1H NMR analysis)]. When we repeated this experiment, now with a mixture of substrates (±)-8a and 3a/b, we observed that (±)-8a did not turn over. This suggested that vicinal diol 3 (or initially oxidized products derived therefrom) might be inhibiting this catalytic system.

Scheme 4
Attempted Oxidative DKR.

We then turned attention to a lipase-mediated DKR (Scheme 5).12 Exposure of the mixture of 3a/b to Amano PS in hexanes containing 5 equivalents of vinyl acetate at ambient temperature resulted in slow but steady conversion. A single, diasteromerically pure acetate was produced [46% yield following a 14-day reaction time and HPLC purification (SiO2)]. This acetate was assigned structure 9a on the following basis. The more polar alcohol, which turned out to have the configurations depicted in 3b, was converted to its R- and S-Mosher ester R-10b and S-10b (via treatment with S- and R-MTPA-Cl, respectively). Analysis13 showed that the configuration of the carbinol center in 3b was S, thereby establishing our structure assignment for both 3a and 3b.

Scheme 5
Lipase Mediated DKR.

Each of 3a and 3b was then independently converted to its acetate ester 9a and 9b, respectively (Scheme 5). The former was identical to the acetate generated by lipase catalyzed acetylation (see above), an outcome that, incidentally, is consistent with the model of Kazlauskas for the kinetic selectivity of lipases.14 To establish that a DKR was operative, the lipase experiment was repeated starting with pure 3b as the substrate. After 14 days (and at ca. 50% conversion), an ca. 2:1:1 ratio of 9a:3a:3b had been established, unambiguously demonstrating that the vinylogous Payne rearrangement-based DKR was indeed taking place.

Each pure allylic alcohol 3a and 3b was oxidized under Swern conditions to furnish both the epoxycyclohexenone 2 found in (+)-scyphostatin and its tris-epimer 11 (Scheme 6). Selective removal of the Troc group proved to be problematic; but this was not surprising given the known sensitivity of the epoxy-alkenols, -alkenyl acetates, and -enones of this family.3

In conclusion, a new strategy for synthesis of the epoxycyclohexenone core of (+)-scyphostatin (1) has been established. It allows concise and stereoselective access to molecules containing the pharmacophoric core of 1 that could be of biological interest. An example of the rare, vinylogous Payne rearrangement, which likely proceeds via a unimolecular (and an unusual type of) prototropic shift, has been uncovered. Furthermore, this transformation was shown to be a viable basis for a DKR. Finally, this DKR is additionally noteworthy because it sets four stereocenters in a single event (cf. 3a + 3b to 9a, Scheme 5).

Scheme 6
Oxidation to Epoxycyclohexenones 2 and 11.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgment

These studies were supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-65597) and the National Cancer Institute (CA-76497) of the United States National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental procedures and spectroscopic characterization data for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

1. Claus RA, Dorer MJ, Bunck AC, Deigner HP. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009;16:1978–2000. [PubMed]
2. Wascholowski V, Giannis A, Pitsinos EN. Chem. Med. Chem. 2006;1:718–721. [PubMed]
3. (a) Inoue M, Yokota W, Murugesh MG, Izuhara T, Katoh T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;116:4303–4305. (b) Inoue M, Yokota W, Katoh T. Synthesis. 2007:622–637. (c) Takagi R, Miyanaga W, Tojo K, Tsuyumine S, Ohkata K. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:4117–4125. [PubMed] (d) Fujioka H, Sawama Y, Kotoku N, Ohnaka T, Okitsu T, Murata N, Kubo O, Li R, Kita Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2007;13:10225–10238. and references therein to the many studies of fragment synthesis. [PubMed]
4. The only example we know of this type of rearrangement (i to ii) occurs under silylative conditions: Myers AG, Siegel DR, Buzard DJ, Charest MG. Org. Lett. 2001;3:2923–2926. [PubMed]
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-163864-f0009.jpg
5. (a) Tanaka M, Nara F, Suzuki-Konagai K, Hosoya T, Ogita T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:7871–7872. (b) Nara F, Tanaka M, Hosoya T, Suzuki-Konagai K, Ogita T. J. Antibiot. 1999;52:525–530. [PubMed] (c) Nara F, Tanaka M, Masuda-Inoue S, Yamasato Y, DoiYoshioka H, Suzuki-Konagai K, Kumakura S, Ogita T. J. Antibiot. 1999;52:531–535. [PubMed]
6. Wharton on a diepoxyketone: (a) Ichihara A, Oda K, Kobayashi M, Sakamura S. Tetrahedron. 1980;36:183–188. (b) Aoyagi Y, Hitotsuyanagi Y, Hasuda T, Fukaya H, Takeya K, Aiyama R, Matsuzaki T, Hashimoto S. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006;16:1947–1949. [PubMed]
7. McKillop A, Taylor RJK, Watson RJ, Lewis N. Chem. Commun. 1992:1589–1591.
8. Saito I, Chujo Y, Shimazu H, Yamane M, Matsuura T, Cahnmann HJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975;97:5272–5277. [PubMed]
9. That the degree of hydrogen bonding is substantial in each of 3a and 3b is supported by the NMR observation of coupling of both of their hydroxyl protons to, for the secondary hydroxyl, the vicinal/allylic proton at C3R/S (3J = ~12 Hz) and, for the tertiary hydroxyl, long range coupling (4J = ~1.5 Hz) to a methylene proton in the sidechain.
10. For other examples of internal hydrogen-bond catalysis see: (a) Choy W, Reed LA, III, Masamune S. J. Org. Chem. 1983;48:1137–1139. (b) Cox CD, Siu T, Danishefsky SJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:5625–5629. [PubMed] (c) Stark LM, Pekari K, Sorensen EJ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004;101:12064–12066. [PubMed]
11. (a) Hashiguchi S, Fujii S, Haack K-J, Matsumura K, Ikariya T, Noyori R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997;36:288–290. (b) Jensen DR, Pugsley JS, Sigman MS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:7475–7476. [PubMed] (c) Sun W, Wang H, Xia C, Li J, Zhao P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:1042–1044. [PubMed]
12. Ghanem A, Aboul-Enein HY. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2004;15:3331–3351.
13. Hoye TR, Jeffrey CS, Shao F. Nature Protocols. 2007;2:2451–2458. [PubMed]
14. Kazlauskas RJ, Weissfloch ANE, Rappaport AT, Cuccia LA. J. Org. Chem. 1991;56:2656–2665.