Flavonoids are phenolic secondary metabolites. Among the molecules sharing the same chemical backbone are three major classes, the pink and purple anthocyanins, the pale yellow flavonols, and the proanthocyanidins (PAs) of seedcoats (). Various ‘
tt’ (
transparent testa) mutants have provided a route for the study of flavonoid metabolic pathways, particularly the stages involving PAs. When these condensed tannins are perturbed in
Arabidopsis thaliana, the seedcoat is paler than normal, giving rise to the name of the mutant series (
Koornneef, 1990).
The presence of anthocyanins in
Arabidopsis vegetative tissues is easily observed since stress often results in purple-pigmented rosette leaves. The main flavonoids in
Arabidopsis leaves, however, are normally the paler-coloured kaempferol and quercitin glycosides (
Pelletier et al., 1999). Most of the aglycone flavonols become glycosylated in the C-3 and C-7 positions, and the principal sugar substitutions are glucose and rhamnose (
Kerhoas et al., 2006). Literature reports identify kaempferol as the origin of most vegetative flavonol glycosides, and kaempferol-3-
O-rhamnoside-7-
O-rhamnoside as a major component (
Routaboul et al., 2006, and references therein). Flowers have also been reported to contain predominantly kaempferol compounds, but quercitin derivatives are known to accumulate in stamens (
Shirley et al., 1995;
Burbulis et al., 1996;
Routaboul et al., 2006). Among the quercitin glycosides identified in inflorescence tissue are quercetin–glucoside–rhamnoside, quercetin–glucoside–rhamnoside–rhamnoside, and quercetin–rhamnoside–rhamnoside (
Jones et al., 2003). Numerous others, including flavonol dimers and oligomers, have been identified in
Arabidopsis seeds (
Routaboul et al., 2006).
The roles of flavonoids in plants range from protection from ultraviolet (UV) light to the pigmentation of flowers to attract pollinators (
Shirley, 2006). Evidence is also accumulating that these compounds are involved in regulating auxin transport since the flavonols quercitin and kaempferol, in particular, can displace synthetic auxin transport inhibitors
in vitro (Jacobs and Rubery, 1998). Indeed, some flavonoid mutants have phenotypes suggestive of altered auxin transport (
Shirley et al., 1995;
Peer et al., 2001,
2004;
Peer and Murphy, 2007). For example, the
Arabidopsis chalcone synthase (CHS)
tt4 mutant has delayed gravitropism and, although flavonoids are classically thought of as localized in the vacuole, the root tissue flavonols involved here may be cytosolic (
Buer and Muday, 2004). Meanwhile, control of bud outgrowth is affected in the
Arabidopsis max1 mutant, in which this regulator of flavonoid pathway genes is missing and which consequently has altered levels of auxin transporters (
Lazar and Goodman, 2006).
Given the many roles of flavonoids, their transport from the site of synthesis (primarily the cytosol) to the correct cell compartment, and between tissues (
Buer et al., 2007), is obviously important and complex. Recently,
Kitamura (2006) and
Marinova et al. (2007) have summarized the known steps for flavonoid synthesis and transport in
Arabidopsis, clearly showing the gaps in our knowledge (): whereas flavonoid biosynthesis is well understood, the proteins transporting anthocyanins and glycosylated quercitins and kaempferols remain little known. Characterization of
tt mutants, however, has provided some insight into flavonoid transport. The product of
TT12 (At3g59030) in
Arabidopsis is a vacuolar flavonoid/H
+ antiporter expressed in seeds (
Debeaujon et al., 2001,
2003;
Marinova et al., 2007). TT12 is a member of the
multidrug
and
toxin
efflux (MATE) transporter family, a group of proteins thought likely to fill some of the other missing steps (
Kitamura, 2006; ). These eukaryotic and prokaryotic transporters are one of the five groups that together comprise the multidrug transporter superfamily (MTS). MATE proteins typically contain 12 transmembrane helices, and are characterized by the absence of the signature sequences found in their four sister groups—the ATP-binding cassette, major facilitator, multidrug resistance (MRP), and resistance–nodulation–cell division families (
Omote et al., 2006).
Arabidopsis MATE proteins have been found in the tonoplast (
Debeaujon et al., 2001,
2003;
Jaquinod et al., 2007;
Marinova et al., 2007), as was an acylated anthocyanin transporter in recent work in grape (
Gomez et al., 2009), but one family member from lupin was identified in the plasma membrane (
Uhde-Stone et al., 2005). The sequestration of anthocyanin and other flavonoids in the vacuole is already linked to other MTS members:
Goodman et al. (2004), using antisense technology to investigate a
Zea mays (maize) MRP (ZmMRP3), found perturbed anthocyanin accumulation.
Arabidopsis MRP may also be responsible for vacuolar uptake of glutathione–anthocyanin conjugates (
Kitamura, 2006).
In
Arabidopsis, there is a large group of >50 MATE proteins (
Kitamura, 2006) of which only a few have been characterized. There are two subgroups, the smaller one being most similar to the bacterial MATE proteins. One of these has been studied: FRD3 (ferric reductase defective 3, At3g08040) is involved in root iron metabolism (
Rogers and Guerinot, 2002;
Green and Rogers, 2004). The second subgroup contains the majority of
A. thaliana members, is similar to human and yeast MATE proteins, and includes the protein described here, a flower flavonoid transporter (FFT). Three proteins from this group have been studied: the product of
TT12, mentioned above; ALF5 (aberrant lateral root formation 5, At3g23560;
Diener et al., 2001), thought to be involved in formation of lateral roots and toxin sensitivity; and EDS5 (enhanced disease susceptibility 5, At4g39030;
Nawrath et al., 2002).
The MATE family member under study here, FFT, is the product of At4g25640 [named, amongst a family of so-called
de
to
xifying efflux carriers, as AtDTX35 by
Li et al. (2002)] in
A. thaliana. It is most similar to putative
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato),
Vitis vinifera (grape) and
Oryza sativa (rice) MATE proteins, and four other
Arabidopsis proteins (
Supplementary Fig. S1 available at
JXB online). Its existence was noted previously in work on tomato describing a MYB overexpression line with altered anthocyanin regulatory pathways (
Mathews et al., 2003). Because of the sequence similarity, these authors speculated that FFT might be involved in anthocyanin sequestration in vegetative tissues. Now identified as a possible vacuolar membrane protein (in a mass spectrometry study of vacuoles isolated from
Arabidopsis cell culture;
Jaquinod et al., 2007), loss of FFT could have profound effects.
It was found that FFT expression was widespread but particularly high in inflorescence tissues, especially in floral epidermal guard cells and those of the anther and nectary. Mutant analysis confirmed that abolishing FFT expression affects flavonoid levels in the plant, also altering root growth, seed development and germination, and pollen development and release. The FFT substrate is not established here, but the data suggest it is more likely to be a glycosylated flavonol than an anthocyanin as previously speculated. FFT can be added to the incomplete flavonoid transport network, and the results also show that correct reproductive development in Arabidopsis requires this putative transporter.