1. Craddock SG, Rounds-Bryant JL, Flynn PM, et al. Characteristics and pretreatment behaviors of clients entering drug abuse treatment: 1969 to 1993. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1997;23:43–59. [PubMed]
2. Maxwell JC. Substance Abuse Trends in Texas, December 1995 (Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse [TCADA] Research Briefs) Austin, TX: TCADA; 1996.
3. Price RH, D'Aunno T. NIDA III Respondent Report Drug Abuse Treatment System Survey: A National Study of the Outpatient Drug-Free and Methadone Treatment System, 1988-1990 Results. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research; 1992.
4. Longshore D, Prendergast ML, Farabee D. Coerced treatment for drug-using criminal offenders. In: Bean P, Nemitz T, editors. Drug Treatment: What Works? New York: Routledge; 2004. pp. 109–121.
5. Anglin MD, Perrochet B. Drug use and crime: a historical review of research conducted by the UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center. Substance Use and Misuse. 1998;33(9):1871–1914. [PubMed]
6. Chaiken JM, Chaiken MR. Drugs and predatory crime. In: Tonry M, Wilson JQ, editors. Crime and Justice, A Review of Research, Vol 13 Drugs and Crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1990. pp. 203–239.
7. Fagan J. Intoxication and aggression. In: Tonry M, Wilson JQ, editors. Crime and Justice, A Review of Research, Vol 13, Drugs and Crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1990. pp. 241–320.
8. McBride DC, McCoy CB. The drugs-crime relationship: an analytic framework. Prison Journal. 1993;73(3–4):257–278.
9. Nurco DN, Kinlock TW, Hanlon TE. The drugs-crime connection. In: Inciardi JA, editor. Handbook of Drug Control in the United States. New York: Greenwood; 1990. pp. 71–90.
10. Parker R, Auerhahn K. Alcohol, drugs, and violence. Annual Review of Sociology. 1998;24:291–311.
11. White HR, Gorman DM. Dynamics of the drug-crime relationship. In: Jefferis E, Munsterman E, editors. Crime and Justice 2000, Vol 1 The Nature of Crime: Continuity and Change. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice; 2000. pp. 151–218.
12. Allen LC, MacKenzie DL, Hickman LJ. The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral treatment for adult offenders: a methodological, quality-based review. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2001;45(4):498–514.
13. Dowden C, Blanchette K. An evaluation of the effectiveness of substance abuse programming for female offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2002;46(2):220–230. [PubMed]
14. Marlowe DB, Glass DJ, Merikle EP, et al. Efficacy of coercion in substance abuse treatment. In: Tims FM, Leukefeld CG, editors. Relapse and Recovery in Addictions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2001. pp. 208–227.
15. Pearson FS, Lipton DS. A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatments for drug abuse. Prison Journal. 1999;79(4):384–410.
16. Pearson FS, Lipton DS, Cleland CM, et al. The effects of behavioral/cognitive-behavioral programs on recidivism. Crime and Delinquency. 2002;48(3):476–497.
17. Sia TL, Dansereau DF, Czuchry ML. Treatment readiness training and probationers' evaluation of substance abuse treatment in a criminal justice setting. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2000;19(4):459–467. [PubMed] 18. Wild TC, Roberts AB, Cooper EL. Compulsory substance abuse treatment: an overview of recent findings and issues. European Addiction Research. 2002;8:84–93. [PubMed]
19. Farabee D, Prendergast M, Anglin D. The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation. 1998;62(1):3–10.
20. Farabee D. Substance Use among Male Inmates Entering the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division, 1993. Austin, TX: Texas Commission of Alcohol and Drug Abuse; 1995.
21. Wild TC, Newton-Taylor B, Alletto R. Perceived coercion among clients entering substance abuse treatment: structural and psychological determinants. Addictive Behaviors. 1998;23(1):81–95. [PubMed]
22. Gilboy J, Schmidt J. “Voluntary” hospitalization of the mentally ill. Northwestern University Law Review. 1971;66:429–453.
23. Lidz CW, Hoge SK, Gardner W, et al. Perceived coercion in mental hospital admission. Pressures and process. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1995;52(12):1034–1039. [PubMed] 24. Nicholson RA, Ekenstam C, Norwood S. Coercion and the outcome of hospitalization. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 1996;19:201–217. [PubMed]
25. Knight K, Hiller ML, Broome KM, et al. Legal pressure, treatment readiness, and engagement in long-term residential programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 2000;31:101–115.
26. Shearer RA, Ogan GD. Voluntary participation and treatment resistance in substance abuse treatment programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 2002;34(3):31–45.
27. De Leon G, Melnick G, Tims FM. The role of motivation and readiness in treatment and recovery. In: Tims FM, Leukefeld CG, Platt JJ, editors. Relapse and Recovery in Addictions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2001. pp. 143–171.
28. Klag S, O'Callaghan F, Creed P. The role and importance of motivation in the treatment of substance abuse. Therapeutic Communities: International Journal for Therapeutic and Supportive Organizations. 2004;25(4):291–317.
29. Simpson DD, Joe GW. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy. 1993;30(2):357–368.
30. De Leon G, Jainchill N. Circumstance, motivation, readiness, and suitability as correlates of treatment tenure. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1986;18(3):203–208. [PubMed] 31. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Rowan-Szal GA. Drug abuse treatment retention and process effects on follow-up outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1997;47:227–235. [PubMed]
32. Cosden M, Basch JE, Campos E, et al. Effects of motivation and problem severity on court-based drug treatment. Crime and Delinquency. 2006;52(4):599–618.
33. Shen W, McLellan AT, Merrill JC. Client's perceived need for treatment and its impact on outcome. Substance Abuse. 2000;21(3):179–192. [PubMed]
34. Hiller ML, Narevic E, Webster M, et al. Problem severity and motivation for treatment in incarcerated substance abusers. Substance Use and Misuse. 2008 in press.
35. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983;51(3):390–395. [PubMed]
36. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Toward a comprehensive model of change. In: Miller WR, Heather N, editors. Treating Addictive Behaviors: Process of Change. New York: Plenum; 1986. pp. 3–27.
37. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behavior. American Psychologist. 1992;47(9):1102–1114. [PubMed] 38. Miller WR. Motivation for treatment: a review with special emphasis on alcoholism. Psychological Bulletin. 1985;98(1):84–107. [PubMed] 39. Smith MB, Hoffmann NG, Nederhoed R. The development and reliability of the Recovery Attitude and Treatment Evaluator-Questionnaire I (RAATE-QI) International Journal of the Addictions. 1995;30(2):147–160. [PubMed] 40. Rollnick S, Heather N, Gold R, et al. Development of a short “Readiness to Change” questionnaire for use in brief opportunistic interventions. British Journal of Addictions. 1992;87:743–754. [PubMed]
41. McConnaughy EA, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Stages of change in psychotherapy: Measurement and sample profiles. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice. 1983;20:368–375.
42. Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Assessing drinkers' motivation for change: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES) Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1996;10:81–89.
43. Urada D, Longshore D, Conner B. Treatment In: Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act: Final Report Prepared for the Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. Los Angeles: UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs; 2007. pp. 33–56.
44. Farabee D, Hser YI, Anglin MD, et al. Recidivism among an early cohort of California's Proposition 36 offenders. Criminology &Public Policy. 2004;3(4):501–522.
45. Hardy M, Teruya C, Longshore D, et al. Initial implementation of California's Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act: findings from focus groups in 10 counties. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2005;28:221–232.
46. Hser YI, Teruya C, Evans EA, et al. Treating drug-abusing offenders: Initial findings from a five-county study on the impact of California's Proposition 36 on the treatment system and patient outcomes. Evaluation Review. 2003;27:479–505. [PubMed] 47. Klein D, Miller RE, Noble A, et al. Incorporating a public health approach in drug law: Lessons from local expansion of treatment capacity and access under California's Proposition 36. Milbank Quarterly. 2004;82(2):723–757. [PubMed]
48. Longshore D, Urada D, Evans E, et al. Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act: 2003 Report Prepared for the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. Los Angeles: UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs; 2004.
49. Bovasso GB, Alterman AI, Cacciola JS, et al. Predictive validity of the Addiction Severity Index's composite scores in the assessment of 2-year outcomes in a methadone maintenance population. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2001;15:171–176. [PubMed] 50. Kosten TR, Rounsaville BJ, Kleber HD. Concurrent validity of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1983;171:606–610. [PubMed] 51. McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, et al. Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. (fifth) 1992;9:199–213. [PubMed] 52. Gardner W, Hoge SK, Bennett N, et al. Two scales for measuring patients' perceptions of coercion during mental hospital admission. Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 1993;11:307–321. [PubMed] 53. Monahan J, Hoge SK, Lidz C, et al. Coercion and commitment: understanding involuntary mental hospital admission. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 1995;18(3):249–263. [PubMed]
54. Farabee D, Hser YH, Anglin MD, et al. Recidivism among an early cohort of California's Proposition 36 offenders. Criminology and Public Policy. 2004;3(4):563–583.
55. Hepburn JR, Harvey AN. The effect of the threat of legal sanction on program retention and completion: Is that why they stay in drug court? Crime & Delinquency. 2007;53(2):255–280.
56. Longshore D, Teruya C. Treatment motivation in drug users: a theory-based analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2006;81:179–188. [PubMed]
57. Urada D, Longshore D. SACPA offenders In: Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act: Final Report Prepared for the Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. Los Angeles: UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs; 2007. pp. 12–32.
58. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112(1):155–159. [PubMed]
59. Stolzenbert L, D'Alessio SJ. Sex differences in the likelihood of arrest. Journal of Criminal Justice. 2004;32:443–454.
60. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference. Effective medical treatment for opiate addiction. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280:1936–1943. [PubMed] 61. Klag S, Creed P, O'Callaghan F. Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure perceived coercion to enter treatment for substance abuse. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2006;20(4):463–470. [PubMed] 62. De Leon G, Melnick G, Kressel D, et al. Circumstances, motivation, readiness, and suitability (the CMRS scales): predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1994;20(4):495–515. [PubMed]
63. Leukefeld CG, Tims FM. Compulsory treatment: a review of findings. In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM, editors. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86) Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1988. pp. 236–249.
64. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior. New York: Guilford; 1991.
65. Czuchry M, Dansereau DF. Using motivational activities to facilitate treatment involvement and reduce risk. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2005;37(1):7–13. [PubMed]
66. Blankenship J, Dansereau DF, Simpson DD. Cognitive enhancements of readiness for corrections-based treatment for drug abuse. Prison Journal. 1999;79(4):431–445.
67. Higgins ST, Silverman K, editors. Motivating behavior change among illicit drug abusers: Research on contingency management interventions. 1st. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999.