|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Molecular and cellular studies of the mechanisms underlying mammalian learning and memory have focused almost exclusively on postsynaptic function. We now reveal an experience-dependent presynaptic mechanism that modulates learning and synaptic plasticity in mice. Consistent with a presynaptic function for endogenous H-ras/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling, we observed that, under normal physiologic conditions in wild-type mice, hippocampus-dependent learning stimulated the ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I, and MEK (MAP kinase kinase)/ERK inhibition selectively decreased the frequency of miniature EPSCs. By generating transgenic mice expressing a constitutively active form of H-ras (H-rasG12V), which is abundantly localized in axon terminals, we were able to increase the ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I. This resulted in several presynaptic changes, including a higher density of docked neurotransmitter vesicles in glutamatergic terminals, an increased frequency of miniature EPSCs, and increased paired-pulse facilitation. In addition, we observed facilitated neurotransmitter release selectively during high-frequency activity with consequent increases in long-term potentiation. Moreover, these mice showed dramatic enhancements in hippocampus-dependent learning. Importantly, deletion of synapsin I, an exclusively presynaptic protein, blocked the enhancements of learning, presynaptic plasticity, and long-term potentiation. Together with previous invertebrate studies, these results demonstrate that presynaptic plasticity represents an important evolutionarily conserved mechanism for modulating learning and memory.
Although extensive evidence supports the involvement of postsynaptic plasticity in mammalian learning and memory (Malenka and Nicoll, 1999; Martin et al., 2000), there is little direct experimental evidence that the complex mechanisms regulating presynaptic plasticity also participate in the acquisition and storage of information in mammals (Powell et al., 2004). Studies using a variety of invertebrate systems have provided compelling evidence for the involvement of presynaptic plasticity in invertebrate learning and memory (Burrell and Sahley, 2001). Additionally, computational models have suggested that short-term presynaptic plasticity is an important mechanism for cortical processing in mammals (Tsodyks and Markram, 1997; Varela et al., 1997; Dobrunz and Stevens, 1999).
By regulating the probability of neurotransmitter release, short-term presynaptic plasticity could affect the induction of long-term changes in synaptic strength thought to underlie learning. In Aplysia, presynaptic neurons require mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling to modulate short- and long-term forms of synaptic plasticity (Martin et al., 1997; Sharma et al., 2003). Furthermore, studies in both Aplysia and mammals have identified a presynaptic mechanism by which ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I (SynI) modulates neurotransmitter release in neuronal culture (Jovanovic et al., 2000; Humeau et al., 2001; Chin et al., 2002; Chi et al., 2003).
Synapsin I is localized to presynaptic terminals and tethers synaptic vesicles to the actin cytoskeleton located in the distal reserve pool (Pieribone et al., 1995). Phosphorylation of synapsin I has been shown to regulate its affinity for both actin and synaptic vesicles (Schiebler et al., 1986; Bahler and Greengard, 1987; Benfenati et al., 1989, 1992; Jovanovic et al., 1996). Together, these results suggest a model in which presynaptic ERK signaling acts via synapsin I to modulate neurotransmitter release during the induction of activity-dependent changes in synaptic strength by trafficking synaptic vesicles between the reserve and readily-releasable pools (Pieribone et al., 1995; Jovanovic et al., 2000, 2001; Chi et al., 2003).
The present study demonstrates that, within the hippocampus, the endogenous H-ras isoform of p21Ras, a potent upstream activator of ERK, is abundantly localized to axon terminals. Consistent with a presynaptic function for downstream endogenous H-ras signaling, we observe that, under normal physiologic conditions in wild-type (WT) mice, hippocampus-dependent learning stimulates the phosphorylation of synapsin I, whereas MAP kinase kinase (MEK)/ERK inhibition decreases the frequency of miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs). Furthermore, we took advantage of the subcellular localization of H-ras to manipulate the H-ras/ERK/synapsin I signaling pathway presynaptically. Our results demonstrate that transgenic expression of active H-rasG12V in mouse glutamatergic forebrain neurons results in an increased frequency of mEPSCs, the facilitation of neurotransmitter release during high-frequency stimulation, consequent increases in long-term potentiation (LTP), and dramatic enhancements in both spatial learning and contextual fear conditioning.
The transgene used in these studies is the human H-ras cDNA, which carries the G12V mutation. The cDNA is under the control of the 8.5 kb promoter region of α calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (αCaMKII) and flanked by 5′ and 3′ artificial splice sites. Using PCR, a sequence encoding the hemagglutinin (HA) epitope was fused 5′ to the H-rasG12V cDNA (kindly provided by L. van Aelst, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY), as well as a 5′ BamHI and 3′ FseI restriction sites. This PCR product was cloned in the BamHI-FseI sites of pNN265 (kindly provided by M. Mayford, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA), resulting in the addition of a 5′-intron and a 3′-intron plus poly(A) signal from simian virus 40. The 2100 bp NotI fragment obtained from this plasmid was cloned in the NotI site downstream of the αCaMKII promoter in the pMM403 vector (kindly provided by M. Mayford). The resulting plasmid (pYE356) was digested with SfiI, and the purified DNA fragment was injected into pronuclei of C57BL/6 zygotes to generate transgenic mice. Transgenic mice were maintained in the background of C57BL/6N (Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY) and crossed with 129/SvEmsJ mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) to generate F1 animals used for experiments. Synapsin I knock-out mice (Rosahl et al., 1993) were maintained in the background of C57BL/6N (Taconic Farms) and crossed with 129/SvEmsJ mice (The Jackson Laboratory) to generate F1 animals. H-rasG12V/synapsin I mice were F2 offspring of F1 H-rasG12V mice crossed with F1 synapsin I knock-out mice, except 100 Hz LTP was performed in H-rasG12V/synapsin I mice of a C57BL/6N genetic background. Consistent with previous reports (Li et al., 1995; Rosahl et al., 1995), synapsin I knock-out mice showing any signs of seizure activity were immediately excluded from experiments. All experiments were performed on adult mice aged 3–6 months old. All experiments were conducted with the experimenter blind to the genotype of the mice and conducted with the approval of the University of California, Los Angeles Animal Research Committee of the Chancellor’s Office of Protection of Research Subjects, under continuous supervision of the campus veterinarian.
In situ hybridization was performed essentially as described by Wisden et al. (1990). The probe used was antisense to the HA sequence: 5′ CTC GAC CTA GAA GGT CCT CCC AGG CTG GCA TAG TCA GGC ACG TC 3′. Immunoblot analyses were performed as described previously (Elgersma et al., 2002). In Figures Figures11 and and4,4, tissue was collected 30 min after behavioral training. The primary antibodies used for immunoblot analyses were against pan-Ras (F132, #32; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), phospho-ERK1/2 (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), phospho-Akt (New England Biolabs), and synapsin I (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Phospho-site 3, phospho-site 4/5, and phosphosite 6 antibodies against synapsin I were kindly provided by J. N. Jovanovic (University College, London, UK) and P. Greengard (Rockefeller University, New York, NY). Blots were quantitated using ECL+ and the Storm 860 phosphorimager system (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Immunohistochemistry was performed using confocal microscopy as described previously (Jaarsma et al., 2001). The primary antibodies used were against H-ras (C20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), HA-11 (clone 16812; Babco, Richmond, CA), vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGLUT1) (Chemicon, Temecula, CA), phospho-ERK1/2 (New England Biolabs), phospho-cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) (New England Biolabs), and MAP2 [Chemicon (clone AP20; Sigma)]. For triple-labeling confocal immunofluorescence, FITC donkey anti-rabbit, cyanine 3 (Cy3) donkey anti-mouse, and Cy5 donkey anti-guinea pig from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA) were used as secondary antibodies. Sections were analyzed with a Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) LSM 510 confocal laser-scanning microscope using a 63×/1.4 numerical aperture oil immersion objective.
For EM immunogold immunohistochemistry, 50 μm vibratome sections of 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde, transcardially perfused mice were processed for osmium-free embedment (Phend et al., 1995). Ultrathin sections were cut, mounted on Formvarcoated nickel grids, and processed for immunogold labeling using the procedure described by Phend et al. (1995). HA-11 diluted at 1:750 and 10 nm gold-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Aurion, Wageningen, The Netherlands) diluted 1:30 were used as primary and secondary antibodies, respectively. Gold-labeled sections were analyzed in a Phillips CM10 electron microscope at 80 kV.
Whole hippocampi from WT and H-rasG12V mice were dissected and processed by a rapid Golgi procedure (5 d in osmium dichromate and 1 d in silver nitrate), embedded in low-viscosity nitrocellulose, cut at 100–120 μm on a sliding microtome, and mounted on glass slides. In each animal, qualitative light microscopic analysis was performed on 10 fully impregnated cells with minimal background arti-fact. In these cells, dendritic spines were analyzed at 1000× under oil immersion along random 25 μm segments of midapical, apical tuft, and basilar dendrites.
The basic protocol for the water maze experiments has been described previously (Costa et al., 2001). Mice were trained with two trials per day for 9 d (1 min intertrial interval). Probe trials were administered after 6 and 9 d, as well as 14 d after the completion of training.
The basic protocol for the contextual fear conditioning experiments has been described previously (Frankland et al., 2001). For experiments using standard delay conditioning, mice were placed in the conditioning chamber for 120 s before the onset of the unconditioned stimulus (US) (0.4 mA, 1 s scrambled footshock). Experiments involving three footshocks used a 20 s intershock interval. For experiments using immediate shock, mice were placed in the conditioning chamber for 2 s before the onset of the US (0.75 mA, 2 s continuous footshock). During the testing phase, conditioning was assessed by measuring freezing and activity for 5 consecutive minutes in the training chamber using a computerized automated scoring system (Anagnostaras et al., 2000). Freezing is operationally defined as a lack of any movement other than that caused by respiration for 2 continuous seconds. Suppression of activity was used as an independent measure of conditioned fear and was calculated as activitytest/(activitytraining + activitytest). All values are reported as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were made using ANOVA with Fisher’s protected least significant difference (PLSD) for post hoc comparisons.
Sagittal hippocampal slices (400 μm) were placed in a submerged recording chamber and perfused continuously at a rate of 1.5 ml/min with artificial CSF (ACSF) equilibrated with 95%O2, 5%CO2 at 30°C. ACSF contained the following (in mm): 120 NaCl, 3.5 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.3 MgSO4, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 d-glucose. Extracellular recording of field EPSP (fEPSPs) were made in CA1 stratum radiatum with platinum/iridium electrodes (Frederick Haer Companu, Bowdoinham, ME). In all experiments, one bipolar platinum/iridium electrode was used to stimulate Schaffer collateral/commissural afferents orthodromically. During LTP studies, a second electrode was used to monitor an independent control pathway. Experiments to observe responses during theta-burst stimulation (TBS) and 5 and 10 Hz stimulation were performed in the presence of 50 μm d-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (APV) and 100 μm picrotoxin with CA3 removed to prevent epileptic discharges. Paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) experiments were conducted in the presence of 50 μm APV. All stimulus pulses were 100 μs in duration and one-third to two-thirds of the maximum fEPSP. Average stimulation strength and baseline fEPSP was similar between genotypes for all of the experiments conducted. For LTP studies, short-term potentiation (STP) was defined as the first posttetanic measurement, made 30 s after LTP induction.
Whole-cell current-clamp recordings were used to study the induction of LTP by low-frequency presynaptic fiber stimulation paired with postsynaptic depolarization. In these experiments, slices with the CA3 region removed were bathed in normal ACSF containing 100 μm picrotoxin. EPSPs evoked by 0.05 Hz presynaptic fiber stimulation were recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons using an Axoclamp 2B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) in bridge mode. Patch electrodes had resistances of 5–7 MΩ and contained a K+-based solution (in mm): 120 potassium methyl-sulfate, 20 KCl, 0.2 EGTA, HEPES, 2 MgCl2, 4 Na2-ATP, 0.3 Tris-GTP, and 7 phosphocreatine. LTP was induced by pairing each of 100 presynaptic fiber stimuli delivered at 0.5 Hz, with a 200 ms, 0.8 nA square-pulse current injection through the whole-cell patch electrode beginning +5 ms after presynaptic fiber stimulation.
Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings using a 3900A Integrating Patch Clamp Amplifier (Dagan, Minneapolis, MN) were performed to measure spontaneous mEPSCs. In this experiment, we used ACSF (in mm): 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 10 d-glucose, 0.001 TTX, 0.025 CGP-35348 [3-amino-propyl-(diethoxymethyl)phosphinic acid], 0.05 picrotoxin, and 0.05 APV. The recording protocol involved a baseline mEPSC recording in ACSF, changing to bath perfusion with ACSF containing U0126 [1,4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis(o-aminophenylmercapto) butadiene] (10 μm) for 15 min, followed by another mEPSC recording. Intracellular pipette solution contained the following (in mm): 135 CsCl, 4 NaCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 0.05 EGTA, 5 QX-314 [N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl carboylmethyl) triethylammonium bromide], 2 Mg-ATP, and 0.5 Na2-GTP. Voltage-clamp recordings were made at a holding potential of −70 mV. The direct current resistances of the electrodes were 4–6 MΩ. Series resistance was compensated by 70–90% using lag values of 7–10 μs. Before compensation, series resistance was <15 MΩ. All recordings were acquired and low-pass filtered (eight-pole Bessel; Brownlee Precision 200, Brownlee Precision, Santa Clara, CA) at 10 kHz and digitized on-line at 20 kHz using a PCI-MIO-IGE data acquisition board (National Instruments, Austin, TX).
Average LTP was assessed during the final 10 min of each protocol. Statistical comparisons were made using the number of mice as the sample size. ANOVA was used with Fisher’s PLSD for post hoc comparisons. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to compare cumulative probability distributions of LTP. All values are reported as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons of mEPSC data were performed using paired and unpaired t tests. mEPSC data were analyzed using custom-written software. Synaptic plasticity data were acquired and analyzed using pClamp 7.0 (Axon Instruments).
Electron microscopy using random sampling of synapses was performed as described previously (Pozzo-Miller et al., 1999). Only complete profiles of nonperforated asymmetric synapses on dendritic spines in stratum radiatum of area CA1 were photographed. The parameters measured in each synapse were length of the active zone, thickness of the postsynaptic density (PSD), total number of small (~50 nm) synaptic vesicles per terminal, and number of docked vesicles. The docked vesicles are defined as those up to one-vesicle-diameter (~50 nm) distance from the active zone, according to criteria developed by Dickinson-Nelson and Reese (1983), because these vesicles have been shown to be depleted during sustained, repetitive activity.
Electron microscopy using three-dimensional terminal reconstruction was performed as described previously (Schikorski and Stevens, 1997, 2001). Briefly, for each animal, a series of electron micrographs were obtained at a final magnification of 30,000× from a ribbon of 28–36 serial sections in stratum radiatum of area CA1. Only complete terminals containing a single nonperforated asymmetric synapse on a dendritic spine were analyzed. The parameters measured in each terminal were total terminal volume, area of the PSD, total number of synaptic vesicles per terminal, and number of docked vesicles. The docked vesicles are defined as those in which no visible gap existed between the vesicle and the membrane wall opposite the PSD (Schikorski and Stevens, 1997).
Although previous studies have demonstrated a robust increase in ERK activation after experience-dependent plasticity (English and Sweatt, 1996; Atkins et al., 1998), few downstream effectors have been identified that contribute to learning and synaptic plasticity (Adams et al., 2000; Yuan et al., 2002). Synapsin I has been identified previously as a prominent downstream effector of ERK (Jovanovic et al., 1996), but phosphorylation-dependent regulation has never been evaluated during learning. Using contextual fear conditioning, we evaluated the dynamics of ERK-dependent synapsin I phosphorylation. During contextual fear conditioning, an association is formed between a distinct context and an aversive footshock delivered in that context. However, significantly decreasing the interval between placement into the conditioning context and delivery of the footshock limits hippocampus-dependent processing of the context. Administering the footshock immediately after introducing animals to the training context (immediate shock) prevents the formation of the contextual representation necessary for fear conditioning (Fanselow, 1990; Rudy et al., 2002). Consistent with a robust and specific function in presynaptic signaling during learning, wild-type C57BL/6N mice showed increased ERK-dependent synapsin I phosphorylation during contextual conditioning compared with the immediate shock condition (Fig. 1A,B) (F(1,6) = 10.18; p < 0.05). Phosphorylation of ERK2 was also increased with a similar specificity (Fig. 1A,B) (F(1,6) = 8.29; p < 0.05).
We sought to explore the function of ERK-dependent synapsin I phosphorylation in learning and synaptic plasticity by engineering transgenic mice to express HA-tagged H-ras containing a substitution of glycine-12 for valine (H-rasG12V) under the control of the αCaMKII promoter (Mayford et al., 1995). The H-rasG12V transgene is a potent upstream activator of ERK in postmitotic neurons (Rosen et al., 1994; Heumann et al., 2000; Koh et al., 2002). In addition, the late postnatal onset of the αCaMKII promoter restricts transgene expression to postmitotic neurons, thereby minimizing putative developmental effects caused by the oncogenic properties of the transgene.
The transgenic allele (H-rasG12V) was inherited in the expected Mendelian frequency, and H-rasG12V mice appeared healthy with no gross behavioral or anatomical abnormalities. Nissl-stained brain sections appeared normal with no gross morphological changes (Fig. 2A). To study the expression pattern of the transgene, in situ hybridization was performed on coronal sections from adult H-rasG12V and WT mice using a probe specific for the transgene. mRNA expression was evident throughout the forebrain, including cortex, striatum, and amygdala, with particularly high concentration in the hippocampus, in which staining was restricted to the pyramidal cell layer in CA regions and to the granule cell layer in the dentate gyrus (Fig. 2B).
Previous studies have suggested that fourfold to fivefold overexpression of H-rasG12V results in significant cytoarchitectural changes in pyramidal neurons (Gartner et al., 2004). However, in our mice, we observed a normal dendritic spine density, quantified by stereologic analysis of Golgi-stained pyramidal neurons in CA1 stratum radiatum (WT, 1.55 ± 0.05 spines/μm3; H-rasG12V, 1.58 ± 0.06 spines/μm3; F(1,223) = 0.04; p = 0.84). The absence of morphological changes in the H-rasG12V mice likely reflects the moderate level of transgene overexpression compared with endogenous H-ras (Fig. 2C) (110 ± 16% of endogenous H-ras). No significant change in endogenous H-ras expression was observed in H-rasG12V mice compared with WT littermates (Fig. 2C) (p = 0.44).
Although previous studies have implicated p21Ras in neuronal function, isoform-specific subcellular localization in neurons has not been well characterized. Therefore, we examined the subcellular localization of endogenous H-ras and transgenic H-rasG12V. Confocal microscopy in the hippocampal CA1 region of WT mice demonstrated extensive colocalization between endogenous H-ras and the excitatory presynaptic marker VGLUT1. In contrast, there was no significant overlap between H-ras and the dendritic marker MAP2 (Fig. 2D–G). In transgenic mice, the subcellular distribution of H-rasG12V was similar to endogenous H-ras and highly localized with the presynaptic marker VGLUT1 (Fig. 2H–K). Analogous to endogenous H-ras, the distribution of transgenic H-rasG12V showed little overlap with MAP2 (Fig. 2G,K), consistent with a predominantly axonal localization of H-ras.
Because confocal immunofluorescence microscopy does not provide adequate resolution to independently evaluate expression in presynaptic axon terminals and postsynaptic dendritic spines, we performed immunogold analysis using electron microscopy to examine the synaptic distribution of H-rasG12V. Gold particles were highly abundant in presynaptic axon terminals (Fig. 2L1–L3). In contrast, substantially less labeling was present in postsynaptic dendritic spines. The ratio of the number of gold particles in presynaptic terminals to that in postsynaptic spines was 3.5 ± 0.19 (paired t(41) = 9.8; p < 0.001).
Importantly, although we observed a predominantly presynaptic localization of H-ras in the hippocampus of mature animals, we observed abundant H-rasG12V localization at presynaptic as well as postsynaptic sites in primary hippocampal cultures (Y. Elgersma and D. Jaarsma, unpublished data), consistent with previous reports (Zhu et al., 2002), suggesting that the localization of p21Ras isoforms in vivo may be developmentally regulated.
We next sought to examine the effects of H-rasG12V expression on downstream signaling pathways. Consistent with many previous studies demonstrating p21Ras-mediated activation of neuronal ERK (Rosen et al., 1994; Heumann et al., 2000; Iida et al., 2001; Adams and Sweatt, 2002; Koh et al., 2002; Komiyama et al., 2002), H-rasG12V mice had increased levels of phosphorylated ERK1 and ERK2 without a change in total ERK1/2 expression (Fig. 3A,B) (pERK1, F(1,9) = 24.9, p < 0.001; pERK2, F(1,9) = 10.2, p < 0.01; total ERK1, F(1,9) = 0.26, p = 0.62; total ERK2, F(1,9) = 0.16, p = 0.74). In contrast, phosphorylated and total levels of Akt, a downstream effector of phosphoinositide-3 kinase, were both unchanged (Fig. 3A,B) (pAkt, F(1,9) = 0.002, p = 0.96; total Akt, F(1,9) = 0.97, p = 0.35). These results are consistent with a biochemical specificity of downstream H-ras effector activation observed in previous studies using neuronal H-rasG12V in vivo (Heumann et al., 2000; Koh et al., 2002). Immunohistochemical analysis in the hippocampal CA1 region demonstrated that areas containing increased pERK1/2 corresponded closely to those expressing H-rasG12V (Fig. 3C–F). In contrast, no change in the number of pERK1/2- or pCREB-positive (+) nuclei were observed (Fig. 3E–H), consistent with the absence of H-rasG12V in the pyramidal cell-body layer (Fig. 3D). Therefore, these data suggest that H-ras expression is highly abundant in axon terminals and functions to regulate local ERK activation.
We next sought to characterize ERK activation and ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I in H-rasG12V mice. Hippocampal lysates were prepared from H-rasG12V and WT littermates after contextual fear conditioning with either an immediate shock or delayed shock. There was a significant interaction of genotype with conditioning on ERK activation and on phosphorylation of synapsin I at the ERK-dependent sites 4/5 (Fig. 4A,B) (pERK2, F(1,9) = 4.56, p = 0.077; pSynI, F(1,9) = 4.75, p = 0.072). Consistent with the experiment in Figure 1 conducted with mice from a C57BL/6N genetic background, contextual conditioning in WT mice (C57BL/6N × 129SvEmsJ F1 hybrid) significantly increased phosphorylation of both synapsin I and ERK2 (Fisher’s PLSD; pSynI, p < 0.05; pERK2, p < 0.05). In contrast, synapsin I and ERK2 phosphorylation were equivalent between H-rasG12V mice receiving contextual conditioning and immediate shock and were similar to conditioned WT mice (pSynI, p = 0.94; pERK2, p = 0.75). Importantly, phosphorylation of synapsin I and ERK2 after hippocampus-dependent learning was equivalent between WT and H-rasG12V mice, arguing that the transgenic manipulation produces biochemical changes that are observed physiologically during learning in WT mice (pSynI, p = 0.84; pERK2, p = 0.43).
In contrast to the differences observed at the ERK-dependent sites 4/5, synapsin I phosphorylation at the CaMKII-dependent site 3 (Bahler and Greengard, 1987) was equivalent in WT and H-rasG12V mice (WT, 100 ± 11.7%; H-rasG12V, 89.5 ± 10.3%; F(1,9) = 0.44; p = 0.52), demonstrating the specificity of the transgenic manipulation. Together, these data suggest that learning-related presynaptic biochemical changes in H-ras/ERK/synapsin I signaling are potentiated in H-rasG12V mice.
Together, the predominantly presynaptic localization of H-ras and enhanced phosphorylation of synapsin I suggest that presynaptic function may be altered in H-rasG12V mice. To explore the frequency-dependent impact of the H-rasG12V mutation on short-term plasticity, we examined PPF, which is thought to depend primarily on presynaptic mechanisms (Dobrunz et al., 1997; Zucker and Regehr, 2002). Indeed, H-rasG12V mice showed a frequency-dependent enhancement of PPF (Fig. 5A) (F(8,88) = 3.4; p < 0.01), performed in the presence of APV to block postsynaptic plasticity. At interpulse intervals ≤100 ms, PPF was significantly larger in H-rasG12V mice than WT littermates (PLSD, p < 0.001). However, at longer intervals, PPF was equivalent in H-rasG12V and WT mice (PLSD, p > 0.42). Together, these data suggest a model in which synaptic transmission is enhanced in H-rasG12V mice during high-frequency stimulation although low-frequency responses are normal. Consistent with this model, baseline synaptic transmission was normal in H-rasG12V mice (Fig. 5B–D) (F(4,76) = 0.07; p = 0.99).
During high-frequency stimulation of the hippocampal Schaffer collateral pathway, depletion of presynaptic neurotransmitter vesicles from the readily-releasable pool occurs rapidly. This is a key mechanism regulating the rate of short-term synaptic depression and serves to limit postsynaptic depolarization (Dobrunz and Stevens, 1997; Brager et al., 2002). To probe the trafficking of reserve pool vesicles to the readily-releasable pool after depletion, we measured responses during a prolonged 10 Hz tetanus in the presence of APV and picrotoxin, which has been used in previous studies to examine vesicle trafficking (Rosahl et al., 1995; Dobrunz and Stevens, 1997; Schnell and Nicoll, 2001; Chi et al., 2003). Responses to stimulation at this frequency reveal the competing processes of facilitation, depression, vesicle depletion, and vesicle mobilization (Dobrunz and Stevens, 1997). H-rasG12V mice showed significantly larger responses at the end of the tetanus, suggesting an increased rate for mobilization of reserve pool vesicles into the readily-releasable pool (Fig. 5E) (F(1,12) = 5.2; p < 0.05). These data further support a model in which ERK-dependent synapsin I phosphorylation enhances neurotransmitter release selectively during patterns of stimulation that significantly deplete the readily-releasable pool of presynaptic neurotransmitter vesicles.
The data presented above suggest that increased trafficking of synaptic vesicles to the readily-releasable pool by ERK-phosphorylated synapsin I may underlie the increased responses to high-frequency stimulation in H-rasG12V mice. To examine whether synapsin I is required for mediating the effects of the H-rasG12V transgene, we crossed synapsin I knock-out mice (Rosahl et al., 1993) with the H-rasG12V transgenics. Next, we examined whether synapsin I mediates the presynaptic facilitation of release during high-frequency stimulation in H-rasG12V mice. Indeed, there was a significant interaction of genotype on fEPSP responses during the 10 Hz tetanus measured in the presence of APV and picrotoxin (Fig. 5F) (F(3,24) = 4.8; p < 0.01). As expected in mice carrying the wild-type synapsin I allele, H-rasG12V(+) mice showed significantly larger responses during the tetanus than H-rasG12V-negative (−) littermates (Fig. 5F) (PLSD, p < 0.05). However, in the background of the synapsin I knock-out allele, H-rasG12V(+) and H-rasG12V(−) mice showed equivalent responses throughout the tetanus (Fig. 5F) (PLSD, p = 0.90). These results strongly argue that synapsin I is necessary to mediate the enhanced presynaptic plasticity observed in H-rasG12V mice.
Synapsin I plays a critical role in establishing the distribution of synaptic vesicles within axon terminals (Hilfiker et al., 1999; Humeau et al., 2001). The finding of a synapsin I-mediated increase in neurotransmitter release during high-frequency stimulation led us to hypothesize that H-rasG12V mice may have an altered distribution of vesicles in presynaptic terminals. Using electron microscopy, we directly addressed this possibility by quantifying the number of morphologically docked vesicles at presynaptic active zones of Schaffer collateral–CA1 synapses, the anatomical correlate of the readily-releasable pool (Dickinson-Nelson and Reese, 1983; Pozzo-Miller et al., 1999; Schikorski and Stevens, 2001) (Fig. 6A). Indeed, significantly more docked vesicles were observed in synapses from H-rasG12V mice (Fig. 6B) (F(1,118) = 29.5; p < 0.001). Additional measurements of the total number of vesicles, active zone area, axon terminal volume, postsynaptic density thickness, and synapse density were normal in H-rasG12V mice (data not shown).
In an independent group of mice, we also performed three-dimensional reconstruction of synaptic terminals using unbiased serial sectioning (Schikorski and Stevens, 1997, 2001). Again, we found a significant increase in docked vesicle density in H-rasG12V terminals (Fig. 6C) (F(1,58) = 12.6; p < 0.001). Together, these data provide anatomical evidence that H-ras/ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I regulates the size of the readily-releasable pool of neurotransmitter vesicles.
Our electrophysiologic data suggest that, during patterns of activity that tend to rapidly deplete the readily-releasable pool of neurotransmitter vesicles, H-rasG12V mice have an attenuation of homosynaptic depression. The demonstration of an increased size of the morphologically docked pool of vesicles further supports our model of presynaptic H-ras/ERK signaling in which ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I shifts the distribution of presynaptic vesicles toward the readily-releasable pool. Therefore, we measured spontaneous mEPSCs in CA1 pyramidal neurons to further examine the functional effects of the alteration in synaptic vesicle distribution in H-rasG12V mice (Fig. 6D–H). Consistent with a presynaptic locus for the observed alterations in synaptic plasticity of H-rasG12V mice, mEPSC frequency was significantly increased without any change in mEPSC amplitude (unpaired t test; frequency, t(1,24) = 9.19, p < 0.001; amplitude, t(1,24) = 0.43, p = 0.67).
We have hypothesized that ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I is an important biochemical event that modulates presynaptic plasticity. Our results have demonstrated that robust physiologic ERK-dependent synapsin I phosphorylation occurs during learning in WT mice. We also hypothesized that, through increased downstream ERK activity, transgenic expression of H-rasG12V requires synapsin I to mediate an enhancement of presynaptic plasticity. Therefore, we perfused the MEK inhibitor U0126 into the extracellular solution immediately after the baseline mEPSC recordings to ask two important questions. First, does presynaptic MEK/ERK activity modulate neurotransmitter release under normal physiologic conditions in WT mice? Second, is the increased mEPSC frequency observed in H-rasG12V mice dependent on a high level of downstream MEK/ERK activity?
After introduction of U0126 into the extracellular solution, the frequency of mEPSCs decreased significantly in CA1 pyramidal neurons of WT mice without any observed change in mEPSC amplitude (paired t test; frequency, t(1,24) = 7.15, p < 0.001; amplitude, t(1,24) = 0.58, p = 0.57), demonstrating that, under normal physiologic conditions, ERK activity modulates presynaptic neurotransmitter release. Additionally, U0126 completely abolished the increase in mEPSC frequency observed in H-rasG12V mice without affecting mEPSC amplitude (unpaired t test; frequency, t(1,24) = 0.16, p = 0.88; amplitude, t(1,24) = 0.28, p = 0.78), confirming that the ERK pathway downstream of H-ras is responsible for the changes in presynaptic function in H-rasG12V mice. These data further support our model hypothesizing that presynaptic neurotransmitter release is modulated over a short temporal window by presynaptic H-ras/ERK/synapsin I signaling.
Because H-rasG12V mice show anatomical and functional changes at presynaptic sites, we next investigated whether the observed alterations in presynaptic plasticity were relevant during the induction of LTP in H-rasG12V mice. To explore this possibility, we examined LTP at the Schaffer collateral–CA1 synapse in acute hippocampal slices. We focused on the Schaffer collateral pathway because many previous studies have demonstrated that LTP at this synapse is crucial for learning contextual and spatial information (Martin et al., 2000). LTP was first induced using five TBS, which mimics the in vivo activity of hippocampal neurons during exploratory behavior (Larson et al., 1986; Otto et al., 1991). TBS consisted of four stimuli delivered at 100 Hz with a 200 ms interval between bursts. Significantly more LTP and STP were observed after five TBS in H-rasG12V mice (Fig. 7A) (LTP, F(1,12) = 4.8, p < 0.05; STP, F(1,12) = 11.2, p < 0.01). In addition, the cumulative probability distribution of LTP was shifted toward significantly larger potentiation after five TBS (Fig. 7B) (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, D = 0.71; p = 0.056). Therefore, H-rasG12V expression enhanced the induction of both short- and long-term changes in synaptic strength after high-frequency presynaptic stimulation.
The predominantly presynaptic localization of H-rasG12V as well as the larger STP suggests that the enhancement in LTP could be mediated by increased neurotransmitter release during high-frequency stimulation. To evaluate this possibility, we recorded fEPSPs during five TBS in the presence of APV and picrotoxin to block NMDA receptor-dependent postsynaptic plasticity and GABA-mediated inhibition, respectively. A significant increase in fEPSP amplitude was observed in response to each theta burst in H-rasG12V mice (Fig. 7C) (F(19,266) = 23.5, p < 0.001). In contrast, fEPSPs returned to normal between the bursts (F(4,56) = 1.0; p = 0.40), suggesting that the enhancement in STP may be frequency dependent.
We next sought to examine the interaction between the observed changes in short-term plasticity and long-term potentiation in H-rasG12V mice. If the enhanced LTP after TBS in H-rasG12V mice is mediated by increased presynaptic release during induction, then LTP should be normal when induced using lower frequencies of presynaptic stimulation that do not result in substantial homosynaptic depression. Indeed, 5 Hz LTP was indistinguishable between WT and H-rasG12V mice (Fig. 7D) (F(1,10) = 0.002; p = 0.97), and the cumulative probability distribution was normal (Fig. 7E) (D = 0.25; p = 0.96). Similarly, H-rasG12V mice showed normal fEPSPs throughout the equivalent 5 Hz stimulus delivered in the presence of APV and picrotoxin (Fig. 7F) (F(1,12) = 0.002; p = 0.97). Therefore, our results suggest that the alterations in long-term synaptic plasticity observed in the transgenic mice are a direct consequence of the frequency-dependent modulation of presynaptic neurotransmitter release during LTP induction.
Our model predicts that STP and LTP are enhanced in H-rasG12V mice selectively after high-frequency stimulation protocols known to substantially deplete the readily-releasable pool. Therefore, similar to the STP and LTP enhancements observed with TBS, a different high-frequency induction protocol should also produce increased potentiation in H-rasG12V mice. Indeed, both STP and LTP induced using a 100 Hz tetanus resulted in significantly more potentiation in H-rasG12V mice (Fig. 8A) (LTP, F(1,28) = 10.1, p < 0.01; STP, F(1,28) = 23.0, p < 0.001). Additionally, the cumulative probability distribution was shifted toward significantly larger LTP in H-rasG12V mice (Fig. 8B) (D = 0.53; p < 0.05). These data suggest that both short- and long-term synaptic potentiation are enhanced in H-rasG12V mice selectively after high-frequency stimulation, consistent with a frequency-dependent increase in presynaptic release.
Our model for the presynaptic frequency-dependent effects of H-rasG12V also predicts that NMDA-dependent associative LTP induced by low-frequency presynaptic stimulation, which does not significantly challenge the readily-releasable pool, should be normal in H-rasG12V mice. Using whole-cell patch clamp, LTP was reliably induced by 100 pairings at 0.5 Hz of a single presynaptic stimulus with a 200 ms postsynaptic current injection and train of action potentials (APs). The whole-cell patch-clamp configuration provided an additional opportunity to detect changes in postsynaptic plasticity because many previous studies have demonstrated that associative LTP requires intact postsynaptic ERK signaling (Watanabe et al., 2002; Zhu et al., 2002; Selcher et al., 2003). Therefore, we used potassium methyl-sulfate in the patch pipette solution to avoid blockade of A-type potassium channels that are modulated by postsynaptic ERK and regulate dendritic excitability (Yuan et al., 2002; Frick et al., 2004). Consistent with intact postsynaptic function in H-rasG12V mice, LTP was normal (Fig. 8C,D) (F(1,13) = 0.49, p = 0.49; cumulative probability distribution, D = 0.48, p = 0.35). Importantly, AP frequency, AP amplitude, AP threshold, membrane potential, and input resistance were also unchanged in H-rasG12V mice (data not shown). Together, these data strongly suggest that enhanced LTP in H-rasG12V mice results from increased synaptic transmission during high-frequency stimulation. Conversely, because low-frequency stimulation does not significantly challenge the presynaptic readily-releasable pool, LTP induced under these conditions is normal. These results highlight the specificity of the electrophysiologic changes and suggest that presynaptic plasticity is enhanced in H-rasG12V mice although postsynaptic function is normal.
Consistent with a frequency-dependent facilitation of presynaptic neurotransmitter release, H-rasG12V mice demonstrate an enhancement in LTP using induction protocols with high-frequency, but not low-frequency, presynaptic stimulation. Thus far, we have demonstrated that a critical downstream effector of H-ras/ERK in modulating short-term presynaptic plasticity is synapsin I. To further examine our hypothesis that synapsin I is a necessary downstream target of presynaptic H-ras/ERK signaling for the modulation of synaptic plasticity, we performed 100 Hz LTP in mice carrying the H-rasG12V transgene in a C57BL/6 genetic background with a targeted deletion of synapsin I (Fig. 8E,F). There was a significant effect of genotype on the magnitude of LTP induced (Fig. 8E) (F(3,59) = 9.10; p < 0.001). Consistent with our previous experiments using high-frequency LTP induction protocols, in mice carrying the wild-type synapsin I allele, H-rasG12V(+) mice showed significantly larger LTP (Fig. 8E) (PLSD, p < 0.001), with a significant shift in the cumulative probability distribution (Fig. 8F) (D = 0.64; p < 0.01). However, in the background of the synapsin I knock-out allele, H-rasG12V(+) and H-rasG12V(−) mice showed an equivalent magnitude of LTP (Fig. 8E) ( p = 0.83) and similar cumulative probability distributions (Fig. 8F) (D = 0.22; p = 0.85). Importantly, in the absence of the H-rasG12V transgene, we replicated the previously published finding that synapsin I knock-out mice have normal 100 Hz LTP (Rosahl et al., 1993) [Fig. 8E ( p = 0.33), F (D = 0.31; p = 0.41)]. Therefore, the presynaptic H-ras/ERK signaling pathway requires synapsin I as a necessary downstream target for modulation of presynaptic plasticity and LTP.
To examine the effects of increased H-ras/ERK/synapsin I signaling on spatial learning, we trained H-rasG12V mice and WT littermates using the Morris water maze. In this hippocampus-dependent task, mice learn to navigate to a submerged platform by using extra-maze cues (Morris et al., 1982). H-rasG12V and WT mice showed equivalent latencies to find the hidden platform during training, with no differences in swimming speed or floating (data not shown). Spatial learning was assessed using probe trials (Brandeis et al., 1989) in which the platform was removed from the pool and the search path was recorded. H-rasG12V mice spent significantly more time in the target quadrant than WT mice during the probe trial conducted on day 6 (Fig. 9A) (F(1,23) = 4.7; p < 0.05). Additionally, the cumulative probability distribution of target quadrant occupancy times revealed that, compared with their WT littermates, H-rasG12V mice showed higher selectivity in their probe trial search path (Fig. 9B). The learning enhancement was confirmed using two additional measures to assess spatial learning during the probe trial. First, H-rasG12V mice searched significantly closer to the target platform location than WT mice (H-rasG12V, 45.1 ± 3.3 cm; WT, 56.3 ± 3.2 cm; F(1,23) = 6.0; p < 0.05). Second, the number of crossings through the target platform location was significantly higher in H-rasG12V (3.0 ± 0.7 crosses) than WT mice (1.2 ± 0.4 crosses) (F(1,23) = 4.7; p < 0.05).
After 3 additional days of training, WT mice improved the selectivity of their probe trial search to a similar level as H-rasG12V littermates (Fig. 9C) (F(1,23) = 0.40; p = 0.53). These results indicate that, although H-rasG12V mice require less training to learn the spatial location of the target platform, additional training allows WT mice to improve their search strategy to a similar asymptotic level.
Although H-rasG12V mice demonstrate enhanced spatial learning, an important question is the stability of their memory for the target platform location. Therefore, we tested mice in a probe trial conducted 14 d after the end of training. Importantly, both groups maintained an equivalently high level of target quadrant selectivity (WT, 40.9 ± 6.3% time; H-rasG12V, 49.3 ± 4.5% time; F(1,23) = 1.2; p = 0.28), confirming that the long-term stability of spatial memory in H-rasG12V mice is intact.
Using contextual fear conditioning, a robust hippocampus-dependent task (Kim and Fanselow, 1992) that relies on stimuli and behavioral outputs distinct from the water maze permitted an independent test of the hypothesis that the enhanced spatial learning in H-rasG12V mice results from a change in hippocampal function. After training with three footshocks, mice were returned to the same context 24 h later to assess long-term memory, and freezing behavior was recorded using automated procedures (Anagnostaras et al., 2000). H-rasG12V mice showed significantly more contextual learning during the 24 h test compared with their WT littermates (F(1,14) = 9.4; p < 0.01), whereas baseline freezing before training was normal (Fig. 9D) (F(1,14) = 0.23; p = 0.64). We also examined the suppression of activity as an additional measure of conditioned fear (Anagnostaras et al., 2000). Indeed, H-rasG12V mice also showed an enhanced suppression ratio consistent with increased fear of the context (WT, 0.21 ± 0.02; H-rasG12V, 0.13 ± 0.01; F(1,14) = 9.9; p < 0.01). Importantly, the enhancement in fear conditioning was not attributable to differences in footshock sensitivity because unconditioned responding during footshock was equivalent for H-rasG12V (38.4 ± 7.1 cm/s) and WT (40.6 ± 4.9 cm/s) littermates (F(1,14) = 0.17; p = 0.69). Short-term memory was assessed after training with a single footshock to avoid saturating the conditioned response. Separate groups of mice were used to independently examine freezing at 2 and 24 h after training. H-rasG12V mice showed significantly more freezing than their WT littermates immediately after shock (F(1,42) = 5.1; p < 0.05) as well as 2 h (F(1,16) = 4.6; p < 0.05) and 24 h (F(1,24) = 6.6; p < 0.05) after training (Fig. 9E).
The formation of contextual fear memory requires an animal to create a hippocampus-dependent representation of the training environment (Kim and Fanselow, 1992; Rudy et al., 2002). Significantly decreasing the placement-to-shock interval during contextual conditioning, so that the animal is shocked immediately after entering the training chamber, results in a concomitant decrease in the strength of the resulting fear memory, known as the immediate shock deficit (ISD). This deficit is thought to arise from an inability to form an adequate representation of the training context (Fanselow, 1990; Frankland et al., 2004). Consistent with this interpretation, preexposure (PE) to the training context can rescue the ISD (Fanselow, 1990) and has been shown to require protein synthesis within the hippocampus (Rudy et al., 2002; Frankland et al., 2004). If the learning enhancements seen in H-rasG12V mice result from an alteration in the processing of contextual and spatial information in the hippocampus, the amount of PE sufficient to rescue the ISD should be decreased in H-rasG12V mice compared with their WT littermates. Therefore, we used a 3 min PE to the training context, which is insufficient to rescue the ISD in WT mice (Frankland et al., 2004). Animals of each genotype received either no preexposure training (NPE) or context PE 24 h before receiving an immediate footshock. Conditioned fear was assessed 24 h after immediate shock training. There was a significant interaction of genotype with preexposure on conditioned fear (Fig. 9F) (F(1,43) = 7.6; p < 0.01). In groups receiving PE training, H-rasG12V mice showed a significant increase in freezing compared with WT mice (PLSD, p < 0.001). Importantly, H-rasG12V and WT mice receiving NPE showed similar freezing after immediate shock training, indicating that increased freezing in H-rasG12V mice is dependent on an involvement of the hippocampus in the formation of contextual representations during fear conditioning (PLSD, p = 0.69).
Our data suggests a model in which presynaptic activation of H-ras/ERK/synapsin I signaling during experience-dependent plasticity functions to modulate learning. Therefore, we hypothesized that, similar to the facilitation in presynaptic plasticity, the hippocampus-dependent learning enhancement displayed by H-rasG12V mice should require synapsin I. To examine whether synapsin I is required for the enhancement in learning, we crossed synapsin I knock-out mice (Rosahl et al., 1993) with H-rasG12V transgenics. Contextual fear conditioning was performed using three footshocks, and long-term memory was assessed in the same context 24 h later in all four genotypic groups. Indeed, there was a significant effect of genotype on conditioned fear (Fig. 9G) (F(3,35) = 5.3; p < 0.01). As expected, H-rasG12V(+) mice showed significantly more freezing than H-rasG12V(−) littermates in the presence of the wild-type synapsin I allele (PLSD, p < 0.05). However in the background of the synapsin I knock-out allele, H-rasG12V(+) and H-rasG12V(−) mice showed equivalent responses (PLSD, p = 0.81), demonstrating that the H-rasG12V-mediated learning enhancement requires synapsin I. Together, these results strongly argue that integrity of the presynaptic H-ras/ERK/synapsin I signaling pathway is necessary for the enhanced synaptic and behavioral plasticity observed in H-rasG12V mice.
In invertebrate systems, coordinated plasticity between presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons has been shown to contribute directly to learning (Antonov et al., 2003; Roberts and Glanzman, 2003). Genetic and pharmacologic studies in mammalian systems have provided considerable evidence that postsynaptic processes required for synaptic plasticity are critical for learning and memory (Martin et al., 2000). However, few studies have identified presynaptic mechanisms necessary for mammalian cognition (Powell et al., 2004). The present study is the first example that targeted manipulation of biochemical signaling in axon terminals can enhance learning and synaptic plasticity in mammals. In addition, our data support the long-standing hypothesis that short-term presynaptic plasticity influences the induction of LTP (Dobrunz and Stevens, 1999). Specifically, our results demonstrate a novel cellular function of H-ras/ERK signaling: by regulating the density of docked vesicles via ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I, experience-dependent changes in the activity of presynaptic H-ras modulate the induction of long-term synaptic plasticity underlying learning through a frequency-dependent facilitation of neurotransmitter release.
Our confocal and electron microscopy studies demonstrate that H-ras is abundantly localized to axon terminals, with limited expression in postsynaptic spines. Although under certain conditions p21Ras appears to be involved in NMDA-dependent postsynaptic plasticity (Husi et al., 2000; Manabe et al., 2000; Zhu et al., 2002), our transgenic results were not caused by postsynaptic mechanisms. Long-term potentiation induced by both theta-frequency extracellular stimulation and associative whole-cell pairing are dependent on ERK signaling in dendrites down-stream of the postsynaptic NMDA receptor (Winder et al., 1999; Watanabe et al., 2002). Consistent with intact postsynaptic ERK signaling, 5 Hz extracellular and 0.5 Hz associative LTP were normal in H-rasG12V mice. In contrast, LTP was increased using NMDA-dependent theta-burst and 100 Hz stimulation protocols, which cause significant short-term presynaptic vesicle depletion. Importantly, the increases in LTP induction observed in H-rasG12V mice were associated with similar increases in short-term presynaptic plasticity, highlighted by the frequency-dependent enhancement of PPF. In particular, our electrophysiologic analyses of short-term plasticity were conducted in the presence of APV and picrotoxin, ensuring that the observed changes truly reflected a modulation of neurotransmitter release, not attributable to alterations in postsynaptic or inhibitory plasticity. The demonstration of enhanced neurotransmitter release during high-frequency stimulation is further supported by the associated increase in docked neurotransmitter vesicles at presynaptic active zones of H-rasG12V mice and an increased frequency but not amplitude of mEPSCs. Interestingly, although PPF, STP, mEPSC frequency, and the density of docked vesicles were all increased, baseline synaptic transmission was maintained, likely mediated through presynaptic homeostatic plasticity (Davis and Goodman, 1998; Jones et al., 1998; Daniels et al., 2004; Piedras-Renteria et al., 2004). Together, these data suggest that the LTP enhancements in H-rasG12V mice do not result from changes in postsynaptic plasticity but rather from a frequency-dependent facilitation of short-term presynaptic plasticity leading to increased neurotransmitter release specifically during high-frequency LTP induction.
Furthermore, we have used a genetic approach to evaluate the hypothesis that the ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I represents a critical presynaptic mechanism responsible for mediating H-ras-dependent changes in behavioral and synaptic plasticity. By crossing H-rasG12V and synapsin I−/− mice, we have confirmed the requirement for the presynaptic target of ERK1/2, synapsin I, in mediating the enhancements of presynaptic plasticity, LTP, and learning observed in H-rasG12V mice. Interestingly, although we show that enhancing synapsin I function leads to LTP and learning enhancements, our present data are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that synapsin I knock-out mice have seemingly normal LTP and learning (Rosahl et al., 1993; Silva et al., 1996), reflecting a functional redundancy between synapsin I and II (Rosahl et al., 1995; Silva et al., 1996). Accordingly, synapsin I/II double mutants show synaptic and learning deficits absent in either single gene mutant (Rosahl et al., 1995; Silva et al., 1996). Consistent with these findings, both synapsin I and II are required for an ERK-dependent facilitation of synaptosomal neurotransmitter release (Jovanovic et al., 2000).
Under normal physiologic conditions in WT mice, we have performed multiple experiments supporting the presence in vivo of a dynamic and experience-dependent endogenous presynaptic H-ras/ERK/synapsin I signaling pathway. In two different genetic backgrounds of WT mice, we demonstrate that ERK-dependent synapsin I phosphorylation occurs specifically during hippocampus-dependent learning but not after unconditioned shock. In addition, the expression level and subcellular localization of H-rasG12V is equivalent to endogenous H-ras, demonstrating that the mechanisms underlying the learning enhancement in H-rasG12V mice are physiologically relevant. Consistent with an important endogenous function for ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I in regulating presynaptic neurotransmitter release dynamics, we also showed that MEK/ERK inhibition selectively decreases mEPSC frequency but not amplitude in normal WT mice and completely abolishes the increased mEPSC frequency in H-rasG12V mice. Importantly, the timescale of MEK/ERK inhibition (15–20 min) during the mEPSC recordings makes a transcription/translation mechanism very unlikely, while supporting a posttranslational mechanism such as the inhibition of ERK-dependent synapsin I phosphorylation at presynaptic sites.
How might the facilitation of neurotransmitter release during high-frequency stimulation mediate an enhancement in spatial learning? Salient information in hippocampal CA1 neuronal ensembles is thought to be encoded during synchronous high-frequency spike bursts contrasting against a homeostatic back-ground of low-frequency activity (Otto et al., 1991; Lisman, 1997). The present findings demonstrate that the H-rasG12V mutation specifically enhances release during patterns of high-frequency synaptic activity typically observed during hippocampus-dependent learning (Otto et al., 1991; Lisman, 1997), while leaving basal synaptic transmission unchanged. Thus, one parsimonious model for the learning enhancements in H-rasG12V mice is an increased fidelity of synaptic transmission during hippocampus-dependent encoding of salient stimuli.
How is the presynaptic H-ras/ERK/synapsin I signaling pathway recruited during learning? A potent presynaptic activator of p21Ras is the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) receptor TrkB. Several genetic and pharmacologic studies have shown that BDNF/TrkB signaling can modulate presynaptic function and learning (Xu et al., 2000; Tyler et al., 2002; Zhang and Poo, 2002). Consistent with our results, BDNF has been shown to increase synaptosomal glutamate release through the ERK-dependent phosphorylation of synapsin I (Jovanovic et al., 2000). In addition, treatment of organotypic hippocampal slices with BDNF results in an increase in the density of docked vesicles (Tyler and Pozzo-Miller, 2001). Similar studies performed in neonatal hippocampal slices demonstrated a BDNF-specific and ERK-dependent attenuation of synaptic fatigue selectively during high-frequency stimulation (Gottschalk et al., 1998, 1999). Finally, the LTP enhancements observed in H-rasG12V mice are consistent with a recent study demonstrating that BDNF modulates presynaptic plasticity at the hippocampal Schaffer collateral–CA1 synapse in vivo (Zakharenko et al., 2003).
The studies presented here represent a first step toward understanding how presynaptic signaling modulates learning and memory in mammals. Together with previous findings in invertebrate models, these results demonstrate that the modulation of presynaptic function is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for learning and memory.
S.A.K. received support from National Institute of Mental Health–National Research Service Award Grant MH063541, National Institutes of Health (NIH)–National Institute of General Medical Sciences Grant GM08042, the Medical Scientist Training Program, the Aesculapians Fund of the University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, and the Tennenbaum Family Creativity Initiative. Y.E. was supported by grants from Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Zorgonderzoek Nederland Medische Wetenschappen (VIDI and TOP). This work was also supported by a generous donation from C. M. Spivak and by grants from the Michael Tennenbaum Creativity Initiative, NIH (Grant R01 NS038480), Neurofibromatosis (National, Illinois, Massachusetts Bay Area, Minnesota, Arizona, Kansas and Central Plains, Mid-Atlantic, and Texas chapters), and the Merck and Neuroscience Nursing Foundations (A.J.S.). We thank L. van Aelst for the human H-rasG12V cDNA, M. Mayford for the pMM403 plasmids, and P. Greengard and J. N. Jovanovic for the phospho-SynI antibodies. We also thank M. Elgersma for help with in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. We are grateful to J. G. Borst, D. V. Buonomano, P. W. Frankland, S. A. Josselyn, J. N. Jovanovic, K. C. Martin, T. J. O’Dell, and F. E. Schweizer for fruitful discussions.