Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Midwifery. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2801597

Women’s attitudes and expectations regarding gynaecological examination

Emre Yanikkerem, MSc, Lecturer,a,* Meral Özdemir, Midwife,a Hilal Bingol, Midwife,a Ayşe Tatar, Administrative Nurse,b and Gülten Karadeniz, PhDa


The gynaecological examination is an essential part of gynaecological care and is the most commonly performed procedure in gynaecological practice. A large number of women in the world will have a gynaecological examination at some time in their lives, and some may undergo several examinations during their lifetime. Gynaecological examination is performed for several reasons, including pregnancy diagnosis, gynaecological screening and as a measure in differential diagnosis (Nylenna, 1985; Wijma et al., 1998; Fiddes et al., 2003; Hilden et al., 2003).

The examination should be performed in a way that makes it a positive experience for women. Since the 1970s, research has investigated the experience of gynaecological examination from women’s perspectives. During the examination, women are in an extremely vulnerable situation (Olsson and Gullberg, 1991; Wendt et al., 2004). Pelvic examination can provoke many negative feelings such as fear of illness, pain, embarrassment and awkwardness (Wendt et al., 2004). Many women have negative experiences of gynaecological examination. Women receive insufficient information about how the examination is performed (Jeppesen, 1995; Larsen and Kragstrup, 1995; Larsen et al., 1997; Wijma et al., 1998), and about the anatomy and physiology of their genitalia (Jeppesen, 1995; Larsen and Kragstrup, 1995). The procedure may be experienced as very unpleasant and humiliating (Wijma et al., 1998). Apart from the physical discomfort, the psychological factors are important, as gynaecological examination involves exposure of intimate parts of the body in a vulnerable situation with loss of control. Women experience many feelings such as embarrassment about undressing, worries about cleanliness, qualms about vaginal odour, concern that the gynaecologist might discover something about sexual practices, fear of discovery of a pathological condition, and fear of pain (Millstein et al., 1984; Seymore et al., 1986; Hilden et al., 2003). Cold instruments, lack of information about the procedure and lack of gentleness from the examiner are also perceived as important factors. Most of the abovementioned aspects may be even more conflicting when the gynaecologist is male (Hilden et al., 2003).

Women’s reluctance to undergo gynaecological examination, due to the nature of the examination, fear or concerns about the gynaecologist’s attitude, may result in delay or avoidance of examination with potentially harmful health effects (Hilden et al., 2003).

From women’s perspectives, these intimate physical examinations have the potential for embarrassment, anxiety and discomfort. Doctors also have anxieties with regard to pelvic examinations, including a lack of confidence in their clinical findings, the fear of allegations of misconduct and, ultimately, the potential for litigation or prosecution. Not infrequently, doctors use the view that ‘women don’t like pelvic examinations’ as a justification for not doing them. Over recent years, medico-legal concerns have become more prominent and the issue of chaperones has become the focus for much of the debate surrounding intimate examinations (Bignell, 1999; Torrance et al., 1999).

According to some research, women want information about the procedure, they prefer a warmed speculum, and they want the doctor to consider their feelings (Broadmore et al., 1986). A Danish project on women’s attitudes towards pelvic examination is one of the few based on women’s own experiences (Jeppesen, 1995). Twelve women aged between 27 and 76 years were interviewed 1 week before hospitalisation for a planned gynaecological operation with the aim of illustrating their experience of pelvic examination. The study demonstrated that women’s experiences of pelvic examination were negative when communication between the women and the doctors was poor. The examination could be a positive experience if the doctor gave information about the procedure and about the findings. Information about the anatomy of the genitalia could also diminish the discomfort of the situation.

There is a general belief, supported in part by the literature, that many women dread pelvic examinations and many prefer to see a female doctor for gynaecological problems (Cooke and Ronalds, 1985; Heaton and Marquez, 1990; Lang, 1990; Levy et al., 1992; Philliber and Jones, 1992). A number of studies in the literature suggest that both male and female patients prefer to see physicians of the same gender, particularly for evaluations that involve examination of the genitalia (Heaton and Marquez, 1990; Lang, 1990; Levy et al., 1992). Communication relating to the outcome of an examination remains an issue. Evidence from one study relating to doctor–patient communication suggests that although the doctor may think that dialogue with a patient was satisfactory, the patient’s experiences of the examination may differ (Lunde, 1993).

The aims of this study were: (1) to describe women’s expectations of nurses and doctors during gynaecological examination; (2) to identify if women have a preference for the doctor’s gender; (3) to investigate women’s feelings during gynaecological examination; and (4) to determine why women consult the gynaecological outpatient clinic.


Sample and the period of study

This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey. Women were recruited to the study from those making an appointment for gynaecological examination at the gynaecological outpatient clinic, Manisa Maternity and Child Hospital between September 2004 and February 2005. Women making an appointment were asked the reason for their appointment, and if it was for a gynaecological matter, they were informed about the study and invited to participate. Women considered to be in an adverse situation (e.g. consulting for an abortion), those who had serious pelvic disease or acute pelvic pain, and women who were staff at the hospital were excluded from the study. In total, 465 women who were considered eligible for inclusion were invited to take parting the study. Of these, 32 refused to take part and the remaining 433 women gave their informed consent to participate in the study.

The questionnaire

A questionnaire, developed by the researchers and consisting of two parts, was used to collect data. The first part included questions about the woman’s sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics, including education level, employment status, income, number of pregnancies, parity, and if she had had any previous miscarriages or abortions. The second part of the questionnaire included questions about her feelings with regard to undergoing pelvic examination, her expectations of the nurse and doctor during the examination, questions relating to preferences about the gender of the doctor, and questions about the reasons for needing an examination. When designing the questionnaire, 10 women were consulted in depth for ideas about appropriate terminology. The comprehensibility and applicability of the questionnaire were checked in a pilot study in which 25 women were asked to complete the questionnaire, following which modifications were made.

Data collection and ethics

Manisa National Health Directorate approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The interview was conducted after obtaining a final formal verbal informed consent. Women were informed about the aim of the study, and were under no pressure to complete the questionnaire. There was no disclosure to any other person that the questionnaire was offered or completed, and all data were confidential. The interview took place in a room separate from the gynaecological outpatient clinic, but in the same building. The questionnaire was administered by means of face-to-face interview before the consultation in the outpatient clinic and took approximately 10 mins to complete.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were undertaken using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows Version 10.0. Frequency and summary statistics were calculated for all variables. Pearson’s Chi-squared test was used to determine the significance of associations between variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered to be significant.


Characteristics of the study population

The demographic and reproductive characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. The 433 women ranged in age from 18 to 76 years [mean 30.5 years, standard deviation (SD) 9.5]; 37.4% were aged ≤25 years and 62.6% of women were aged >25 years. In total, 60.5% of women were educated to elementary level or less, 39.5% had completed more than elementary level, and 96.1% of women were married. Overall, 21.5% of women were working full- or part-time, and 66.7% reported that their income was equal to their outgoings. Overall, 79% of women had previously been pregnant.

Table 1
Characteristics of study population.

Reasons for and frequency of consultations at the gynaecological outpatient clinic

Most women attended the clinic for routine assessment of a previously diagnosed pelvic problem, such as vaginitis, uterine bleeding, pregnancy or pain (36.7%), and 19.9% of women attended because of pregnancy problems. Gynaecological reasons for outpatient consultation also included chronic pelvic pain (27.3%), abnormal uterine bleeding (15.5%), infertility (3.5%), vaginitis (17.6%) and itching (9.9%). Reasons for consultation are shown in Table 2.

Table 2
Reasons for attending gynaecological outpatient clinic.

Overall, 19.4% of women had not undergone pelvic examination previously. Approximately one in 10 women said that they required pelvic examination regularly (9.5%). Most women (68.6%) attended the gynaecological outpatient clinic if they had a specific problem. The frequency with which women attended for pelvic examination is shown in Table 3.

Table 3
Frequency of women’s attendance for pelvic examination.

Women’s feelings during pelvic examination

This study found that 54.8% of women felt anxious or worried about their health situation during pelvic examination, and 41.8% of women were embarrassed about having to undress. Overall, 38.3% of respondents stated that fear of discovery of a pathological condition or fear of severe illness were their main concerns. One out of four women expressed worries about cleanliness or fear that the equipment used during the examination was unsterile. In total, 18% of women feared that they would experience pain during the examination. Table 4 shows women’s feelings during pelvic examination.

Table 4
Women’s feelings during pelvic examination.

Women’s preferences for doctor’s gender

When asked about their preferences with regard to the gender of the examining doctor, 45.5% of women reported that they would prefer a female doctor, 4.2% of women would prefer a male doctor, and the remaining women (49.9%) expressed no preference (Table 5).

Table 5
Women’s preferred gender of the doctor performing pelvic examination.

Women who expressed a preference for a female doctor were asked why this was so. Almost all of them stated that they felt more comfortable with a female doctor. Reasons given by women who wished to consult a female doctor also included religious beliefs, reluctance to discuss sensitive and confidential issues with a male doctor, and cultural objections. Reasons given by women who expressed a preference for a male doctor included that they felt they had a greater opportunity to gain more information about management, or that they could communicate more freely about reproductive problems (data not shown in the table).

When responder characteristics were examined, women aged ≤25 years, with elementary school education or less, who were unemployed, had a lower income, or were more likely to report that they felt ashamed during the examination were more likely to prefer a female doctor; this difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Overall, 56.0% of nulliparous women expressed a preference for a female doctor compared with 42.7% of multiparous women, although this difference was not statistically significant. Women who attended for regular pelvic examinations were less likely to prefer to have a female doctor, but this difference was not statistically significant. Associations between some selected characteristics and women’s preferences for the gender of the doctor are shown in Table 6.

Table 6
Association between some selected characteristics and women’s preference for the gender of the doctor performing pelvic examination.

When asked about their preference for another clinician to be present during their pelvic examination, 24.7% of respondents stated that they preferred to have a single doctor present during this examination. Approximately half of the women preferred to have a doctor and nurse present, but only 4.0% of women said that they would prefer to have a doctor, nurse and medical student. Almost one in five women expressed a wish for their partner to be present during this examination. Women’s preferences for another person to be present during pelvic examination are presented in Table 7.

Table 7
Women’s preference for another person being present during pelvic examination.

Women’s expectations of nurses and doctors during gynaecological examination

Women were asked about their expectations of what the doctor should tell them about their pelvic examination. Most women (62.1%) expected the doctor to explain their health situation after the examination, and several women (22.4%) thought that the doctor should talk to them before the examination. Almost half of the women said that the doctor should have an understanding, gentle manner. Overall, 30.0% of women stated that the doctor should listen to them, and 38.6% of women expected the examination to be comprehensive and thorough.

Women were also asked about their expectations of the nurse during pelvic examination. In total, 71.8% of women said that the nurse should have an understanding, gentle manner, and 28.2% of women stated that the nurse should offer information about the examination. Overall, 20.8% of women said that the nurse should prepare the woman for the examination (how to get into the chair and how to put her feet into the lithotomy position), and 20.8% of women expected the nurse to help to relax the woman (Table 8).

Table 8
Women’s expectations of doctors and nurses during pelvic examination.


This study surveyed women attending an outpatient clinic about their attitudes towards pelvic examination and their expectations of the practitioners. The study also aimed to get feedback from women. This was necessary to determine and improve the quality of the health service. The study sample comprised 433 (93.1% response rate) of the 465 eligible women. According to the women’s feedback, most were pleased with being asked for their opinion on this issue, and offered positive feedback on the study. In addition, the study results were fed back to hospital management and nurses/doctors, as outcomes will inform planning strategies for reproductive health care in Manisa Maternity Child Hospital.

Bimanual pelvic examination and speculum examination form an essential part of the work of practitioners involved in the provision of reproductive health services. Most women have to undergo this procedure several times in their lives. Pelvic examination is essential for the early detection of genital cancer, infection or other abnormalities. Outcomes for genital cancer will be enhanced if the cancer is found early, and early detection and treatment of other problems can often prevent problems from becoming more serious. A study of pelvic examination in 2623 healthy volunteers taking part in an ovarian-cancer-screening programme concluded that pelvic examination is of questionable value as a screening tool (Grover and Quinn, 1995). In the present study, only one out of 10 women said that they attended the gynaecological clinic regularly. Women should be informed of the benefits of intimate examination and be offered an explanation of the procedure involved, possibly including information about the limitations of pelvic examination and engendering realistic beliefs in the patient.

In this study, almost half of the respondents said that they had no preference regarding the doctor’s gender. Only 4.2% of women had a definite preference for a male doctor, and almost half of the women in this study expressed a clear preference for a female doctor. This finding is similar to that of Webb and Opdahl in 1996. They found that 43% of female patients preferred to have a female doctor (Webb and Opdahl, 1996). However, Fiddes et al. (2003) and Rizk et al. (2005) reported that 76% and 86.4% of women preferred to be treated by female physicians, respectively. Similar to the present survey, the patient’s educational level (Elstad, 1994; van Elderen et al., 1998; Rizk et al., 2005), socio-economic status (Schmittdiel et al., 1999; Franks and Bertakis, 2003; Rizk et al., 2005) and parity (Rizk et al., 2005) have been reported to affect their preference for the gender of their obstetrician and gynaecologist providers. According to the present study findings, women aged ≤25 years preferred to have a female doctor for gynaecological examination. A preference for a female provider has also been found in women <30 years of age in some studies (ACOG News Release

It is noteworthy that the experience of discomfort during gynaecological examination was independent of the gender of the gynaecologist. There is some evidence that women prefer a female gynaecologist when asked prior to an examination; nevertheless, when asked after an examination, undertaken by a doctor of either gender, the preference is not as strong (Seymore et al., 1986). Hilden et al. (2003) evaluated women’s experiences of gynaecological examination and assessed possible factors such as discomfort. This study of consecutive patients visiting the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Glostrup County Hospital, Denmark used a postal questionnaire that included questions about the index visit, obstetric and gynaecological history, and history of sexual abuse. The degree of discomfort during gynaecological examination was indicated on a scale from 0 to 10. Experiencing discomfort was defined as a score of 6 or more, based on the 75th percentile. Discomfort during gynaecological examination was strongly associated with a negative emotional contact with the examiner and young age. Additionally, dissatisfaction with present sexual life, a history of sexual abuse and mental health problems such as depression, anxiety and insomnia were significantly associated with discomfort. They stated that gynaecologists need to focus on emotional contact and re-evaluate issues for communication before the examination (Hilden et al., 2003).

According to the present study, there was a significant association between experiencing shame and age ≤25 years compared with age >25 years. A tendency towards decreased shame with increasing age was found. This supports earlier findings (Millstein et al., 1984; Brixen and Kragstrup, 1995; Wijma et al., 1998; Hilden et al., 2003) that young women and women having their first examination experience discomfort or anxiety to a greater extent than women who have undergone repeated examinations.

In the present study, one out of four women did not want another person present during pelvic examination. Women may feel shame and embarrassment when other people are looking. However, this finding has an adverse effect on the involvement of medical students and clinical tutors in outpatient obstetric and gynaecologic care, and consequently in teaching and acquisition of clinical skills. A report from New Zealand (Broadmore et al., 1986) concluded that female patients prefer a chaperone during pelvic examination. The study by Larsen et al. (1997), a qualitative study in 13 women, found that none of the women expressed any wish for a chaperone, because a chaperone may even increase the feelings of embarrassment. If the doctor’s need for security over-rides the wishes of women, the presence of a chaperone must be clearly explained, and not introduced on behalf of women (Larsen et al., 1997).

In the present study, a significant proportion (41.8%) of women said that pelvic examination leads to feelings of lost dignity and shyness. Most women mentioned different aspects of being undressed in front of the doctor. This finding indicates that sexuality is a common connation of pelvic examination. Nearly half of the women in this study said that they were nervous about the consultation. These results are similar to those from other studies in Turkey (Mete, 1998; Şirin and Nar, 1999; Akarer, 2003). According to Mete (1998), women experience a high level of anxiety during gynaecological examinations. The most important reasons for anxiety among women undergoing gynaecological examinations are: fear of learning that they have cancer; fear of pain; being examined by a male doctor; the tool used for examination; and the examination position (Mete, 1998). One qualitative study reported women’s experiences of pelvic examinations and found that nearly all women were nervous before the consultation. Some women were affected by the gender of the doctor (Larsen et al., 1997). In a study on behavioural indicators of anxiety during gynaecological examination, it was found that the gender of the examiner and his/her professional training had no bearing on anxiety levels (Reddy and Wasserman, 1997).

The present study found that one out of five women stated that they would feel pain because of speculum examination. Larsen and Kragstrup (1995) found that among teenagers who had not previously undergone pelvic examination, almost half thought that the examination would be painful. It is concluded that a considerable proportion of teenagers have negative expectations of pelvic examination, and increased effort to improve teenagers’ expectations and knowledge about pelvic examination may be recommended (Larsen and Kragstrup, 1995). Reddy and Wasserman identified easily recognisable behaviours reflecting high anxiety in gynaecology patients. Upon recognising these behaviours, clinicians can take the necessary measures to reduce patient anxiety and prevent delays in and avoidance of gynaecological examinations (Reddy and Wasserman, 1997).

Gynaecological examination requires a physician–patient or nurse–patient interaction that involves a high degree of personal intimacy, and it requires the patient to disrobe and to expose intimate parts of their body. These individuals often prefer to be seen by female physicians in the belief that female physicians are more empathetic and thus would provide better and more thorough care (Kreuter and Strecher, 1995). The findings of the present study emphasise the importance of good emotional contact between patients and nurses/doctors. Good emotional contact is established by showing empathy and having time to listen to the patients’ needs, expectations and worries, as well as giving them information on procedures. Most women expected doctors to provide an explanation about their health situation and to communicate with them. As in earlier studies, this study showed that information is an important part of the examination situation. Women want their doctor to talk about what happened during the examination; when doctors listened to women and understood them, the situation became more positive (ACOG News Release; Larsen et al., 1997; Mete, 1998; Wijma et al., 1998; Şirin and Nar, 1999; Wendt et al., 2004). When information is insufficient, women may be worried. This may contribute to women revisiting the clinic unnecessarily, or possibly not returning at all (Wendt et al., 2004).

Psychosomatic and communication skills of doctors and nurses may help to decrease the frequency of negative experiences during the first gynaecological examination. Pelvic examination could be a positive experience; doctors and nurses should provide information about the examination, listen to women and show that they have time for them. Health-care providers should notice women’s problems and use terminology that lay people understand (Wendt et al., 2004).

Previous research has shown that pain, anxiety or both are frequently reported following a woman’s first pelvic examination (Larsen and Kragstrup, 1995; Reddy and Wasserman, 1997; Wijma et al., 1998). As the experience of the first pelvic examination is such a key experience for future pelvic examinations, it is a great challenge for the obstetric/gynaecological profession to try to change the experience of the first pelvic examination into a positive experience.

The provision of information and a respectful and engaged behaviour during gynaecological examinations was of great importance for women. This study could help to improve health programmes to improve the experience of gynaecological examination for women.


Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.


  • ACOG News Release. A report card for ob/gyns: how women rate their doctors.
  • Akarer B. Graduate thesis. Ege University School of Nursing; İzmir: 2003. Determination of anxiety level of women aged between 15 and 49 before gynecologic examination.
  • Bignell CJ. Chaperones for genital examination. British Medical Journal. 1999;319:137–138. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Broadmore J, Carr-Gregg M, Hutton JD. Vaginal examinations: women’s experiences and preferences. The New Zealand Medical Journal. 1986;99:8–10. [PubMed]
  • Cooke M, Ronalds C. Women doctors in urban general practice: the patients. British Medical Journal. 1985;290:751–754. [PubMed]
  • Elstad JI. Women’s priorities regarding physician behavior and their preference for a female physician. Women Health. 1994;21:1–19. [PubMed]
  • Fiddes P, Scott A, Fletcher J, et al. Attitudes towards pelvic examination and chaperones: a questionnaire survey of patients and providers. Contraception. 2003;67:313–317. [PubMed]
  • Franks P, Bertakis KD. Physician gender, patient gender, and primary care. Journal Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003;12:73–80. [PubMed]
  • Grover SR, Quinn MA. Is there any value in bimanual pelvic examination as a screening test? The Medical Journal of Australia. 1995;162:408–410. [PubMed]
  • Heaton CJ, Marquez JT. Patient preferences for physician gender in male genital/rectal exam. Family Practice Research. 1990;10:105–115. [PubMed]
  • Hilden M, Sidenius K, Langhoff-Roos J, et al. Women’s experiences of the gynecologic examination: factors associated with discomfort. Acta Obstetricia Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2003;82:1030–1036. [PubMed]
  • Jeppesen U. Kvinders holding til den gynaekologiske undersogelse. (Women’s attitudes towards pelvic examination) Ugeskr Laeger. 1995;157:1651–1654. [PubMed]
  • Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ. Are patients of women physicians screened more aggressively? Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1995;10:119–125. [PubMed]
  • Lang F. Resident behaviors during observed pelvic examination. Family Medicine. 1990;22:153–155. [PubMed]
  • Larsen M, Oldeide CC, Materud K. Not so bad after all…..women’s experiences of pelvic examination. Family Practice. 1997;14:148–152. [PubMed]
  • Larsen SB, Kragstrup J. Expectations and knowledge of pelvic examinations in a random sample of Danish teenagers. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1995a;16:93–99. [PubMed]
  • Larsen SB, Kragstrup J. Experiences of the first pelvic examination in a random sample of Danish teenagers. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1995b;74:137–141. [PubMed]
  • Levy S, Dowling P, Boult L, et al. The effect of physician and patient gender on preventive medicine practices in patients older than fifty. Family Medicine. 1992;24:58–61. [PubMed]
  • Lunde IM. Patients’ perceptions – a shift in medical perceptive. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 1993;11:98–104. [PubMed]
  • Mete SK. The effects of nursing approach to anxiety of women coming in the gynecologic examination. Cumhuriyet University School of Nursing Journal. 1998;2:1–7.
  • Millstein SG, Adler NE, Jr, Irwin CE. Sources of anxiety about pelvic examinations among adolescent females. Journal of Adolescent Health Care. 1984;5:105–111. [PubMed]
  • Nylenna M. Why do our patients see us? A study reasons for encounter in general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 1985;3:155–162. [PubMed]
  • Olsson HM, Gullberg MT. Fundemental and situational components in a strategy for attaining a positive experience of the pelvic examination: a conceptual approach. Health Care for Women International. 1991;12:415–429. [PubMed]
  • Philliber SG, Jones J. Staffing a contraceptive service for adolescents: the importance of sex, race and age. Public Health Reports. 1992;97:165–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Reddy DM, Wasserman SA. Patient anxiety during gynecologic examinations. Behavioral indicators. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 1997;42:631–636. [PubMed]
  • Rizk DE, El-Zubeir MA, Al-Dhaheri AM, et al. Determinants of women’s choice of their obstetrician and gynecologist provider in the UAE. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2005;84:48–53. [PubMed]
  • Schmittdiel J, Selby JV, Grumbach K, et al. Women’s provider preferences for basic gynecology care in a large health maintenance organization. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine. 1999;8:825–833. [PubMed]
  • Seymore C, DuRant RH, Jay MS, et al. Influence of position during examination, and sex of examiner on patient anxiety during pelvic examination. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1986;108:312–317. [PubMed]
  • Şirin A, Nar M. The investigation of the anxiety levels of women before the gynecologic examination. Ege University School of Nursing Journal. 1999;15:115–126.
  • Torrance C, Bas R, Allison MA. Use of chaperones in clinics for genitourinary medicine: survey of consultants. British Medical Journal. 1999;319:159–160. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • van Elderen T, Maes S, Rouneau C, et al. Perceived gender differences in physician consulting behavior during internal examination. Family Practice. 1998;15:147–152. [PubMed]
  • Webb R, Opdahl M. Breast and pelvic examinations: easing women’s discomfort. Canadian Family Physician. 1996;42:54–58. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wendt E, Fridlund B, Lidell E. Trust and confirmation in a gynecologic examination situation: a critical incident technique analysis. Acta Obstetricia Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2004;83:1208–1215. [PubMed]
  • Wijma B, Gulleberg M, Kjessler B. Attitudes towards pelvic examinations in a random sample of Swedish women. Acta Obstetricia Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1998;77:422–428. [PubMed]