PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Am Diet Assoc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 September 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2799115
NIHMSID: NIHMS142431

Are school employees healthy role models? Dietary intake results from the ACTION worksite wellness trial

Heather L. Hartline-Grafton, DrPH, RD, Senior Nutrition Policy Analyst, Donald Rose, PhD, MPH, RD, Associate Professor,corresponding author Carolyn C. Johnson, PhD, FAAHB, Professor, Janet C. Rice, PhD, Associate Professor, and Larry S. Webber, PhD, Professor

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the dietary intake of school employees, a key target group for improving school nutrition.

Objective

To investigate selected dietary variables and weight status among elementary school personnel.

Design

Cross-sectional, descriptive study.

Subjects/setting

Elementary school employees (n=373) from 22 schools in a suburban parish (county) of southeastern Louisiana were randomly selected for evaluation at baseline of ACTION, a school-based worksite wellness trial.

Methods

Two 24-hour dietary recalls were administered on non-consecutive days by registered dietitians using the Nutrition Data System for Research. Height and weight were measured by trained examiners and body mass index calculated as weight (kilograms)/height (meters squared).

Statistical analyses performed

Descriptive analyses characterized energy, macronutrient, fiber, and MyPyramid food group consumption. Inferential statistics (t-tests, analysis of variance, chi-square) were used to examine differences in intake and compliance with recommendations by demographic and weight status categories.

Results

Approximately 31% and 40% of the sample were overweight and obese, respectively, with higher obesity rates than state and national estimates. Mean daily energy intake among women was 1862 kilocalories (kcal) (±492) and among men was 2668 kcal (±796). Obese employees consumed more calories (+288 kcal, p<0.001) and more calories from fat (p<0.001) than those who were normal weight. Approximately 45% of the sample exceeded dietary fat recommendations. On average, only 9% had fiber intakes at or above their Adequate Intake, which is consistent with the finding that over 25% of employees did not eat fruit, 58% did not eat dark green vegetables, and 45% did not eat whole grains on the recalled days. Only 7% of employees met the MyPyramid recommendations for fruits or vegetables, and 14% of the sample met those for milk and dairy foods.

Conclusions

These results suggest that greater attention be directed to understanding and improving the diets of school employees given their high rates of overweight and obesity, poor diets, and important role in student health.

Keywords: school employees, MyPyramid, macronutrients

Introduction

Little is known about the diets and weight status of school employees, a key target group for improving school nutrition. Instructional staff members provide nutrition and health education in the classroom and cafeteria workers oversee school meal programs. Personnel also serve as role models for students, which is particularly important given the alarming rates of childhood obesity (1, 2). Few studies have measured the dietary intake of US school personnel, and these studies either were conducted at least a decade ago or present an insufficient amount of data to draw conclusions about overall dietary intake (3-6).

Although little is known about school personnel, US dietary intake, in general, has room for improvement, especially given that 66.3% of US adults are overweight (Body Mass Index [BMI] ≥25) and 32.2% are obese (BMI ≥30) (1). National survey and food disappearance data indicate that total caloric and fat intake have increased in the US, with concurrent increases in the prevalence of overweight and obesity since the 1970's (7-12). In addition, fewer than 3% of males and only 8% of females meet the Adequate Intake (AI) for total fiber (13).

Several studies have compared dietary intake to the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans and MyPyramid Food Guidance System (MyPyramid) (14-20). None of these studies, however, used physical activity, weight, and height data in determining individual MyPyramid food intake patterns. Furthermore, most used data collected before the release of MyPyramid. Four studies were conducted in children or adolescents which limits generalizability to adults, and one used food availability data as proxies for actual food consumption. Despite their limitations, these studies suggest that substantial changes in consumption are necessary for the food groups promoted in the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans and MyPyramid. For example, among 31-50 year old females consuming the 1800 calorie MyPyramid food intake pattern and males consuming the 2200 calorie pattern, consumption should increase by at least 100% for fruit, approximately 50% for vegetables, over 100% for milk and milk products (women), over 50% for milk and milk products (men), and approximately 300% for whole grains to meet recommendations (14). These findings are not surprising given the long history of non-compliance with federal dietary guidelines in the US; yet more research is needed on current consumption relative to MyPyramid, especially given the limitations of the most recent studies (21-26).

To provide data for the aforementioned research gaps, the current paper investigates the dietary intake of elementary school personnel and contributes to the limited literature on MyPyramid food group consumption. The following research questions were addressed among a sample of elementary school personnel in southeastern Louisiana: 1) What are school personnel consuming relative to energy, macronutrients, fiber, and MyPyramid food groups; and 2) How does consumption of selected nutrients and foods compare with the Dietary Reference Intakes and MyPyramid recommendations?

Methods

ACTION Worksite Wellness for Elementary School Personnel (ACTION)

ACTION is a school-based worksite wellness intervention trial to reduce and/or prevent overweight and obesity through individual and environmental approaches that promote healthful eating and physical activity. This group-randomized trial in a suburban parish (county) of southeastern Louisiana is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and has been specifically described elsewhere (27).

Recruitment

All 55 eligible district elementary schools (publicly-funded and not designed as a special population school) were invited to participate in the study during presentations conducted at two meetings of school principals in 2004. Twenty two principals expressed ongoing interest and their schools were recruited into the study. This paper presents cross-sectional data collected at baseline of ACTION, prior to randomization of schools into intervention and control groups. Participating schools were scattered throughout the school district, had standardized test scores within the overall range of scores in the district, and ranged in staff sizes like all schools in the district.

Sample

In each school, 20 employees were randomly selected for dietary interviews. The total number of employees eligible for dietary recalls was 941, but the number per school ranged from 24 to 93 depending on the school size. Of the 440 randomly selected, 23 were excluded from analysis because they were ineligible (e.g., substitute teacher) (n=12), pregnant or breastfeeding (n=7), or had missing or other race-ethnicity data (n=4). An additional 44 participants were identified as under-reporters, and thus excluded, based on Huang and colleagues' method for identifying implausible reports of energy intake (28). Individuals with reported energy intake below a 2.0 standard deviation (s.d.) cut-off of predicted energy were considered under-reporters in the current study. Predicted energy was determined using estimated energy requirement equations for normal-weight adults and total energy expenditure equations for overweight and obese adults (29). Measured height, weight, and physical activity were used in these equations. Thus, 373 was the final sample size for this study.

Data Collection Methods and Procedures

All baseline measurements were conducted during the fall of 2006. Protocols were approved by the Tulane University Institutional Review Board and voluntary written consent was obtained from participants, who received a gift certificate at a local retail store for their participation.

Body Composition

Height and weight were measured in duplicate by trained examiners during a physical examination. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a portable stadiometer and weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg with a calibrated scale. These measurements were repeated if the difference between weights and heights was ≥0.5 kg and ≥1 cm, respectively. Heights and weights were converted into BMI (kg/m2) (30). BMI was used to classify participants as normal weight (BMI <25.0 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2), or obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2).

Surveys

Date-of-birth, race-ethnicity, gender, and tobacco use data were collected via self-report through written surveys distributed at consent or during the physical examination. Job category was obtained from employee rosters provided by the school.

ActiGraph Accelerometer

Physical activity was measured by an ActiGraph uniaxial accelerometer worn for seven days except while sleeping or during water activities (ActiGraph, LLC., Pensacola, FL). This electro-mechanical device, worn around the waist, records acceleration and deceleration of movement, time of day, and activity counts. The ActiGraph data, collected approximately two weeks prior to the dietary interviews, were converted into mean minutes per day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (31).

24-Hour Dietary Recall

Dietary information was obtained from two in-person 24-hour dietary recalls administered on non-consecutive days by three registered dietitians using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) (version 2006, University of Minnesota, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Minneapolis, MN, http://www.ncc.umn.edu). The 24-hour recall, widely used in dietary studies, allows estimation of absolute nutrient intakes and involves minimal subject burden (32). School personnel were notified of the weeks of the interviews to minimize disruptions, but the day was not revealed to reduce instrument effects. Participants were scheduled for one recall per week and all schools had at least one day of data collection on a Monday for recall of a weekend day.

NDSR is a computer-assisted software program developed and maintained by the University of Minnesota's Nutrition Coordinating Center (NCC) for standardized dietary recall and record collection. The three dietary interviewers were trained to use the software and two were certified by NCC. NDSR combines dietary data collection and data entry, and has a database containing over 18,000 foods. Items not found in the database, such as missing or regional foods, were submitted to NCC for resolution if no appropriate substitution was identified. NDSR features the multiple-pass approach with prompts to help users collect data in a thorough manner, thus providing multiple opportunities for respondents to recall items consumed in order to reduce underreporting (33). The study protocol provided standardized probes and prompts to further reduce recall bias. Standardized measurement aids and visuals, such as two- and three-dimensional food models, were used to assist respondents in quantifying reported foods and beverages.

Definition of Key Variables

Total energy intake (in kilocalories (kcal)), the percentage of kilocalories from macronutrient sources, and total dietary fiber intake (in grams) were calculated from foods and beverages in the 24-hour recall.

MyPyramid food group consumption was calculated from the NCC Food Group Serving Count System. The latter, first introduced in NDSR 2006 for food-based dietary analysis, assigns a serving size to each food. NCC serving counts are reported in terms of servings from a food sub-group (e.g., citrus fruit), which can then be summed with other sub-groups for the number of servings of a food group (e.g., fruit sub-groups to a total fruit group). Because MyPyramid recommendations are expressed as cup or ounce equivalents rather than servings, it was necessary to convert the NCC serving counts into MyPyramid cup or ounce equivalents. The NCC sub-groups matching MyPyramid groups of relevance were first identified (14, 34, 35). The NCC sub-group serving sizes were then compared to the MyPyramid cup or ounce equivalent (14, 35). NCC sub-group counts needed either a simple conversion (i.e., divide all fruit and vegetable counts by two) or no conversion (i.e., all other food groups) to generate approximate MyPyramid cup or ounce equivalents. This overall approach is comparable to other fruit and vegetable studies (36). Dry beans and peas can be assigned to two MyPyramid food groups: meat and beans or total vegetables. To avoid double counting, they were assigned to the latter. Whole grain consumption was also calculated, defined by NCC as grain products with a whole grain ingredient listed as the first ingredient on the food label.

Statistical Analysis

Dietary analyses were based on averaging dietary intake from two 24-hour dietary recalls. For the 7.5% of participants (n=28) who completed only one recall, data from this single recall were used.

Descriptive statistics were generated for key variables, including intakes of energy, macronutrients, fiber, and food groups. Differences in intake were examined through t-tests (for gender, race-ethnicity, and job category) and analysis of variance for age group and BMI category. Least significant difference (LSD) multiple comparison tests were used if the analysis of variance was significant (p<0.05). Because of the small number of Hispanics in the sample, inferential statistics by race-ethnicity were performed between Whites and African-Americans only. Hispanics were included in all other analyses. Intakes of fruit and milk were not normally distributed; therefore, statistical tests for fruit and milk intake were based on log-transformed intakes. Macronutrient and fiber intake were also compared to the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) and AI recommendations, respectively (29). Chi-square analysis was used to test for differences in compliance. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (version 14.0.1, 2005, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).

Each participant was assigned to one of nine MyPyramid food intake patterns using two methods to compare consumption to MyPyramid recommendations. MyPyramid includes 12 patterns, but the 1000, 1200, and 1400 patterns are not recommended for adults because they provide insufficient energy to meet nutritional needs (37). The first assignment approach (A1), simulating a consumer's MyPyramid web-site experience, was based on the calories needed to maintain current weight assessed by estimating total energy expenditure. This was calculated using the total energy expenditure equations for normal, overweight, and obese adults and then rounding to the nearest 200 calorie MyPyramid food intake pattern between 1600-3200 calories (29). For the second approach (A2), individuals were assigned to a pattern based on their current energy intake, as estimated from the 24-hour recall data. Mean energy intake was rounded to the nearest 200 calorie pattern between 1600-3200 calories.

Investigators are often interested in usual intake, which refers to the long-term daily average of dietary intake by an individual (38). Usual intake distributions are important in determining the proportion of a population that meets or exceeds a given dietary standard. Estimates based on intake distributions from 24-hour recalls, however, can be biased, since within-person variation in daily intake is sizable. This bias can be reduced by collecting data from a large number of days, which is often impractical and unsatisfactory, or by using a statistical modeling method for estimating usual intake distributions (39). To test the potential bias in the current sample, usual intake distributions were generated for fat and fiber using the National Research Council and Institute of Medicine's modeling method outlined by Dodd and colleagues (39).

Results

Sample Characteristics

Key demographic characteristics are presented in Table 1. The sample was predominantly female, between 30-59 years of age (mean age 47.7 years ±10.6), white, and instructional personnel. Approximately 70% of the sample was overweight or obese, with a mean BMI of 29.1 kg/m2 (±6.6). Approximately 91% did not smoke and 99.7% were sedentary (i.e., engaged in less than 30 minutes of daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity as estimated by the ActiGraph accelerometer) (not shown).

Table 1
Demographic characteristics and mean energy, percent of calories from fat and carbohydrate, and fiber intake among elementary school personnel (ACTION)

Energy, Macronutrient, and Fiber Intake

For the full sample, mean energy intake was 1,916 kcal (±555) and the proportion of calories from fat and carbohydrate was 34.7% (±7.3) and 49.5% (±9.0), respectively (Table 1). Mean energy intake per employee ranged from 979 kcal to 5279 kcal (not shown). Mean protein consumption was 15.8% (±3.8) and mean alcohol consumption was 1.6% (±4.3) of energy intake, with 44.0% consuming no alcohol on recalled days (not shown). Men consumed more calories than women, a greater proportion of calories from fat, and a smaller proportion of calories from carbohydrate, though the latter two differences were not statistically significant. African-Americans consumed less protein than Whites (14.7% vs. 16.0%, p=0.013) (not shown). Obese individuals consumed significantly more calories and calories from fat and significantly fewer calories from carbohydrate than those who were normal weight. Mean fiber intake was 15.0 g (±5.5) across the sample. Significantly greater dietary fiber intakes were observed for men compared to women, and intake increased with increasing age group.

Over 45% of the sample exceeded the fat Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) and 31% fell below the carbohydrate AMDR (Table 2). Approximately 96% were within the protein AMDR (not shown). Dietary fat intake was above the AMDR for approximately one-third to one-half of employees across most demographic categories. Over 42% of overweight and 54% of obese employees consumed fat in excess of the AMDR, compared to 37% of normal weight employees. Conversely, carbohydrate intake was below the AMDR for approximately one-quarter to one-third of individuals in most categories. About 8.8% had fiber intakes at or above their AI.

Table 2
Approximate compliance with the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges (AMDR) for fat and carbohydrate and Adequate Intake (AI) for fiber among elementary school personnel (ACTION)a,b

MyPyramid Food Group Intake

School employees, on average, consumed approximately ½ cup equivalents of fruit, 1-1/3 cup equivalents of vegetables, 6 ounce equivalents of grains, 5½ ounce equivalents of meat and beans, and 1½ cup equivalents of milk (Table 3). Men consumed more from all food groups compared to women, with significant differences for fruits, grains, and meat and beans. African-Americans consumed significantly more meat and beans than Whites, but less milk. Normal weight employees had significantly lower grain and meat and beans consumption than obese employees. No significant differences were observed by job or age category except that younger age groups consumed fewer fruits.

Table 3
Mean MyPyramid food group intake among elementary school personnel (ACTION)

Table 4 presents the number and proportion of employees consuming no foods from MyPyramid food groups and sub-groups on the days preceding the interviews. Approximately one-quarter consumed no fruits and almost half consumed no whole grains. All employees consumed some vegetables; however, 57.6% consumed no dark green vegetables, 47.7% no orange vegetables, and 72.7% no dry beans and peas.

Table 4
Number and percent of respondents who did not eat items from the MyPyramid food groups

Whether the assignment approach was based on current weight (A1) or current energy intake (A2), the majority of employees were not meeting recommendations based on separate analyses (not shown). Approximately 7% of employees met fruit or vegetable recommendations. Approximately 14%, 40%, and 45% of participants met recommendations for dairy, grains, and meat and beans, respectively. No participants under 30 years of age met fruit recommendations, and no African-Americans met milk recommendations. MyPyramid also recommends consuming half of grains from whole grains, but only 5.6% achieved this recommendation (35). Finally, in comparing assignment approaches (A1 or A2), compliance was comparable for fruits, meat and beans, and milk, but somewhat more variable for vegetables and grains, particularly by age and BMI categories.

For all means, frequencies, and statistical tests presented, the results did not change substantially when males were excluded from the analysis, although energy intake decreased across most groups in Table 1 after excluding males.

Usual Intake of Fat and Fiber

Assessment of the percent above and below nutrient standards (Table 2 results) could be biased if within-person variation is large. To assess this potential bias, statistical methods were used to estimate usual intake distributions for the percentage of kcal from fat and for fiber. This was done for female respondents; cell sizes were too small to reliably estimate distributions for men. Using a distribution based on mean intakes, rather than usual intakes, had a negligible effect on the results (not shown). Overall, approximately 44% of females exceeded the AMDR for fat and few met or exceeded the fiber AI.

Discussion

This study is one of the first to examine dietary intakes of elementary school personnel. Dietary fat intake was high while fiber intake was low for this group with high rates of overweight and obesity. Fruit, vegetable, whole grain, and milk intake were also poor. The 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans report suggests that for females 31-50 years of age, a large proportion of the current sample, consumption needs to increase to meet recommendations by 0.8 cups for fruits, 0.9 cups for vegetables, 1.6 cups for milk and milk products, and 2.2 ounces for whole grains among those consuming the 1800 calorie food intake pattern (14). Other studies among adults also highlight poor consumption relative to MyPyramid (15-17, 40). This study, which addressed some of the methodological limitations in previous research, provides evidence that fruit, vegetable, whole grain, and milk consumption needs to increase substantially among this sample to meet recommendations.

Approximately 40% of elementary school personnel in this sample were obese, which is higher than the national estimate (32%), based on measured height and weight (1). It is also higher than state (27.1%) and local (31.5%) estimates based on self-reported height and weight (41). The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the US and in Louisiana generally increases with age, which may account for the high rates here considering the mean age of 48 years (1, 41).

The high prevalence of obesity in the current study sample could also be attributed to a number of dietary factors observed, including high fat and low fiber intake. Historically, low-fat diets have been promoted to reduce the risk of chronic disease and obesity, and are also associated with successful, long-term weight loss maintenance (14, 42-44). Dietary fat is more energy dense and palatable than other nutrients, which could lead to the overconsumption of energy (45). Conversely, diets high in fiber may reduce body weight or energy intake by increasing satiety and satiation and reducing hunger (46-49). All but one employee was sedentary based on an objective physical activity measure, which also likely contributed to the obesity rates.

The low fiber intake, and to some extent the high fat intake, can be explained by low fruit, vegetable, and whole grain intake, with less than 10% of the sample meeting their fruit or vegetable recommendations and fully 45% eating no whole grains at all on recalled days. Clearly health promotion efforts are needed to increase consumption of these foods. Greater fruit and vegetable intake reduces the risk of heart disease, diabetes, some cancers, and other chronic diseases and can be effective for weight management (14, 50, 51). Whole grains, like fruits and vegetables, are important sources of dietary fiber, which may reduce the risk of heart disease, diabetes, and some types of cancer (14, 29, 52). Prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies also offer evidence that greater fiber or whole-grain intake is inversely related to weight gain or BMI (53-58).

Milk, like fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, is strongly encouraged in the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, but only 16% of Whites and no African-Americans met milk recommendations (not shown). Although African-Americans tend to have a high prevalence of lactose intolerance, MyPyramid promotes non-dairy alternatives (59). Foods in the MyPyramid milk group should be encouraged because they are important for bone health and sources of potassium, calcium, and vitamin D, nutrients that are of growing concern in the US (14, 60, 61).

There are several potential limitations to this study. Although elementary schools in the sample employed personnel with diverse demographic, educational, and socioeconomic backgrounds, the sample was restricted to southeastern Louisiana. Thus, the findings may have limited generalizability in that residents of southern states generally have poorer diet quality and higher rates of overweight and obesity compared to those in other regions of the country (22, 41, 62).

Underreporting is a common problem for assessing dietary intake, and overweight and obese participants are more likely to underreport energy consumption than lean participants (63-66). This is especially a concern here given the high rates of overweight and obesity; however, the recall methodology in this study was designed to minimize underreporting and under-reporters were removed from the analysis using accepted, objective methods.

The 24-hour dietary recall interviews were scheduled during the school week, thus no dietary intake data were collected for Friday or Saturday. Continuing Surveys of Food Intake by Individuals data indicate that people consume more calories, fat, and alcohol on the weekend (Friday-Sunday) than weekdays (Monday-Thursday) (67). The omission of Friday and Saturday intake could impact the results, particularly by underestimating energy, fat, and alcohol intake; however, 43.7% (n=163) of the sample did report dietary intake for Sunday, thus accounting for intake on one weekend day. One other limitation of the 24-hour dietary recall method is that it does not capture usual intake, and thus does not account for the potentially sizable within-person variation in daily intake. By collecting two days of dietary intake for a large proportion of the recall sample, it was possible to estimate the usual intake of fiber and the proportion of kcal from fat using accepted statistical methods (39). The results indicate that the proportion below or above recommendations for fat or for fiber did not differ substantially when using mean intake or usual intake distributions.

Conclusions

Elementary school personnel educate students on healthy eating in the classroom and school cafeteria, and serve as role models. Yet, in this locality, they have high rates of overweight and obesity and consume too much fat and too little fiber. In addition, the majority of employees were not meeting MyPyramid recommendations, and compliance was particularly poor for fruits, vegetables, whole-grains, and milk. Targeting efforts to improve the health promotion of staff is one of the eight components of a coordinated school health program (68), and the results presented here suggest the need for this type of intervention. Unfortunately, few worksite wellness programs have been developed and evaluated for use in the school setting despite the fact that schools across the country employ 6.7 million teachers and staff (69). School employee health is critical to student health and academic achievement, yet school-based health promotion efforts typically focus on students (2). One exception to this was a well-designed study that measured the impact of a 2-year teacher wellness program on physiological and behavioral outcomes in teachers, as well as students (6). The study found no evidence of an effect of the program. The authors attributed this to factors specific to the school setting, i.e. participation in a wellness program required staying after school and extending the workday. These results suggest that greater attention be directed to understanding how to improve the diets of school employees, not only for their own health status but also to improve their effectiveness as role models for their students.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL079509). The authors would like to thank the ACTION school employees who participated in the study and the ACTION staff members for supporting and assisting with research activities.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Heather L. Hartline-Grafton, Food Research and Action Center, 1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 540, Washington, DC 20009, Telephone: 202-986-2200, Fax: 202-986-2525.

Donald Rose, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA, Telephone: 504-988-5742, Fax: 504-988-3540.

Carolyn C. Johnson, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA, Telephone: 504-988-4068, Fax: 504-988-3540.

Janet C. Rice, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA, Telephone: 504-988-7330, Fax: 504-988-1706.

Larry S. Webber, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA, Telephone: 504-988-7322, Fax: 504-988-1706.

References

1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. Jama. 2006;295:1549–1555. [PubMed]
2. Directors of Health Promotion and Education. School Employee Wellness: A Guide for Protecting the Assets of Our Nation's Schools. Washington, DC: Directors of Health Promotion and Education; 2007.
3. Bradfield RH, Fones DM. Recipe for burnout: The special education teachers' diet. Acad Ther. 1984;19:499–504.
4. Cullen KW, Baranowski T, Baranowski J, Hebert D, deMoor C, Hearn MD, Resnicow K. Influence of school organizational characteristics on the outcomes of a school health promotion program. J Sch Health. 1999;69:376–380. [PubMed]
5. Horn-Ross PL, Hoggatt KJ, West DW, Krone MR, Stewart SL, Anton-Culver H, Bernstein L, Deapen D, Peel D, Pinder R, Reynolds P, Ross RK, Wright W, Ziogas A. Recent diet and breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study (USA) Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13:407–415. [PubMed]
6. Resnicow K, Davis M, Smith M, Baranowski T, Lin LS, Baranowski J, Doyle C, Wang DT. Results of the TeachWell worksite wellness program. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:250–257. [PubMed]
7. Briefel RR, Johnson CL. Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States. Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:401–431. [PubMed]
8. Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. US food supply: Nutrients and other food components, 1909 to 2004. [May 7, 2008]. Economic Research Service Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodConsumption/NutrientAvailIndex.htm. Published February 15, 2007. Updated March 15, 2008.
9. Cutler DM, Glaeser EL, Shapiro JM. Why have Americans become more obese? J Econ Perspect. 2003;17:93–118.
10. Hiza HAB, Bente L. Home Economics Research Report. Vol. 57. US Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; 2007. Nutrient content of the US food supply, 1909-2004: A summary report.
11. Wright JD, Kennedy-Stephenson J, Wang CY, McDowell MA, Johnson CL. Trends in intake of energy and macronutrients – United States, 1971-2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(4):80–82. [PubMed]
12. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. Jama. 2002;288:1723–1727. [PubMed]
13. Moshfegh A, Goldman J, Cleveland L. What We Eat in America, NHANES 2001-2002: Usual Nutrient Intakes from Food Compared to Dietary Reference Intakes. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service; 2005.
14. US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2005. 6th. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2005.
15. Buzby JC, Wells HF, Vocke G. Economic Research Report. Vol. 31. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2006. Possible implications for US agriculture from adoption of select dietary guidelines.
16. Guenther PM, Dodd KW, Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM. Most Americans eat much less than recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1371–1379. [PubMed]
17. Knol LL, Haughton B, Fitzhugh EC. Food group adherence scores assess food patterns compared to US Department of Agriculture Food Guide. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1201–1208. [PubMed]
18. Ball SC, Benjamin SE, Ward DS. Dietary intakes in North Carolina child-care centers: Are children meeting current recommendations? J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:718–721. [PubMed]
19. Kranz S, Lin PJ, Wagstaff DA. Children's dairy intake in the United States: Too little, too fat? J Pediatr. 2007;151:642–646. [PubMed]
20. Sebastian RS, Cleveland LE, Goldman JD. Effect of snacking frequency on adolescents' dietary intakes and meeting national recommendations. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42:503–511. [PubMed]
21. Basiotis PP, Carlson A, Gerrior SA, Juan WY, Lino M. Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. Vol. 12. US Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; 2002. The Healthy Eating Index: 1999-2000.
22. Bowman SA, Lino M, Gerrior SA, Basiotis PP. Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. Vol. 5. US Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; 1998. The Healthy Eating Index: 1994-96.
23. Dixon LB, Cronin FJ, Krebs-Smith SM. Let the pyramid guide your food choices: capturing the total diet concept. J Nutr. 2001;131:461S–472S. [PubMed]
24. Munoz KA, Krebs-Smith SM, Ballard-Barbash R, Cleveland LE. Food intakes of US children and adolescents compared with recommendations. Pediatrics. 1997;100:323–329. [PubMed]
25. Murphy SP, Rose D, Hudes M, Viteri FE. Demographic and economic factors associated with dietary quality for adults in the 1987-88 Nationwide Food Consumption Survey. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992;92:1352–1357. [PubMed]
26. Serdula MK, Coates RJ, Byers T, Simoes E, Mokdad AH, Subar AF. Fruit and vegetable intake among adults in 16 states: results of a brief telephone survey. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:236–239. [PubMed]
27. Webber LS, Johnson CC, Rose D, Rice JC. Development of ACTION! Wellness Program for Elementary School Personnel. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15 1:48S–56S. [PubMed]
28. Huang TT, Roberts SB, Howarth NC, McCrory MA. Effect of screening out implausible energy intake reports on relationships between diet and BMI. Obes Res. 2005;13:1205–1217. [PubMed]
29. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients) Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2005. [PubMed]
30. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. NIH Publication, 98-4083. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1998. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. [PubMed]
31. Catellier DJ, Hannan PJ, Murray DM, Addy CL, Conway TL, Yang S, Rice JC. Imputation of missing data when measuring physical activity by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37 11:S555–S562. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Willett WC. Nutritional Epidemiology. 2nd. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
33. Guenther PM, DeMaio TJ, Ingwersen LA, Berlin M. The multiple-pass approach for the 24-h recall in the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (Abstract) FASEB J. 1996;10:A198.
34. Guenther PM, Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM, Reedy BB, Basiotis PP. Development and Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2005: Technical Report. US Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; 2007.
35. US Department of Agriculture. [December 19, 2008]. MyPyramid Web site. http://www.mypyramid.gov. Updated December 11, 2008.
36. Mitchell DC, Bailey RL, Hartman TJ, Smiciklas-Wright H. Nutrition implications of low fruit and vegetable intakes in the Geisinger Rural Aging Study (Abstract) Society for Experimental Biology Proceedings. [May 7, 2008]. April 28-May 2, 2007. Agricultural Research Service Web site. http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/Publications.htm?seq_no_115=213182.
37. Britten P, Marcoe K, Yamini S, Davis C. Development of food intake patterns for the MyPyramid Food Guidance System. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006;38:S78–S92. [PubMed]
38. Guenther PM, Kott PS, Carriquiry AL. Development of an approach for estimating usual nutrient intake distributions at the population level. J Nutr. 1997;127:1106–1112. [PubMed]
39. Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Freedman LS, Subar AF, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Tooze JA, Krebs-Smith SM. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1640–1650. [PubMed]
40. Bachman JL, Reedy J, Subar AF, Krebs-Smith SM. Sources of food group intakes among the US population, 2001-2002. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:804–814. [PubMed]
41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.
42. Davis C, Saltos E. Dietary recommendations and how they have changed over time. In: Frazao E, editor. America's Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences. Agriculture Information Bulletin. Vol. 750. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Food and Rural Economics Division; 1999. pp. 33–50.
43. US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2000. 5th. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000.
44. Wing RR, Phelan S. Long-term weight loss maintenance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:222S–225S. [PubMed]
45. Willett WC. Dietary fat plays a major role in obesity: no. Obes Rev. 2002;3:59–68. [PubMed]
46. Burton-Freeman B. Dietary fiber and energy regulation. J Nutr. 2000;130:272S–275S. [PubMed]
47. Howarth NC, Saltzman E, Roberts SB. Dietary fiber and weight regulation. Nutr Rev. 2001;59:129–139. [PubMed]
48. Pereira MA, Ludwig DS. Dietary fiber and body-weight regulation. Observations and mechanisms. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48(4):969–980. [PubMed]
49. Slavin JL. Dietary fiber and body weight. Nutrition. 2005;21:411–418. [PubMed]
50. Bazzano LA. The high cost of not consuming fruits and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1364–1368. [PubMed]
51. Rolls BJ, Ello-Martin JA, Tohill BC. What can intervention studies tell us about the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and weight management? Nutr Rev. 2004;62:1–17. [PubMed]
52. Marlett JA, McBurney MI, Slavin JL. Position of the American Dietetic Association: health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:993–1000. [PubMed]
53. Bes-Rastrollo M, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Sanchez-Villegas A, de la Fuente Arrillaga C, Martinez JA. Association of fiber intake and fruit/vegetable consumption with weight gain in a Mediterranean population. Nutrition. 2006;22:504–511. [PubMed]
54. Howarth NC, Huang TT, Roberts SB, McCrory MA. Dietary fiber and fat are associated with excess weight in young and middle-aged US adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:1365–1372. [PubMed]
55. Koh-Banerjee P, Franz M, Sampson L, Liu S, Jacobs DR, Jr, Spiegelman D, Willett W, Rimm E. Changes in whole-grain, bran, and cereal fiber consumption in relation to 8-y weight gain among men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:1237–1245. [PubMed]
56. Liu S, Willett WC, Manson JE, Hu FB, Rosner B, Colditz G. Relation between changes in intakes of dietary fiber and grain products and changes in weight and development of obesity among middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:920–927. [PubMed]
57. Ludwig DS, Pereira MA, Kroenke CH, Hilner JE, Van Horn L, Slattery ML, Jacobs DR. Dietary fiber, weight gain, and cardiovascular disease risk factors in young adults. Jama. 1999;282:1539–1546. [PubMed]
58. McKeown NM, Meigs JB, Liu S, Wilson PW, Jacques PF. Whole-grain intake is favorably associated with metabolic risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:390–398. [PubMed]
59. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. NIH Publication, 06–2751. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2006. Lactose intolerance.
60. Calvo MS, Whiting SJ, Barton CN. Vitamin D fortification in the United States and Canada: current status and data needs. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:1710S–1716S. [PubMed]
61. Moore C, Murphy MM, Keast DR, Holick MF. Vitamin D intake in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:980–983. [PubMed]
62. Vitolins MZ, Tooze JA, Golden SL, Arcury TA, Bell RA, Davis C, Devellis RF, Quandt SA. Older adults in the rural South are not meeting healthful eating guidelines. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:265–272. [PubMed]
63. Bandini LG, Schoeller DA, Cyr HN, Dietz WH. Validity of reported energy intake in obese and nonobese adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;52:421–425. [PubMed]
64. Black AE, Prentice AM, Goldberg GR, Jebb SA, Bingham SA, Livingstone MB, Coward WA. Measurements of total energy expenditure provide insights into the validity of dietary measurements of energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993;93:572–579. [PubMed]
65. Briefel RR, Sempos CT, McDowell MA, Chien S, Alaimo K. Dietary methods research in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: underreporting of energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1203S–1209S. [PubMed]
66. Heitmann BL, Lissner L. Dietary underreporting by obese individuals--is it specific or non-specific? Bmj. 1995;311:986–989. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Haines PS, Hama MY, Guilkey DK, Popkin BM. Weekend eating in the United States is linked with greater energy, fat, and alcohol intake. Obes Res. 2003;11:945–949. [PubMed]
68. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [December 19, 2008]. Coordinated School Health Program Website. http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/CSHP. Updated September 24, 2008.
69. National Center for Education Statistics. Projected number of participants in educational institutions, by level and control of institution: Fall 2005. Digest of Education Statistics Web site. [May 7, 2008]. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d05/tables/dt05_001.asp. Published August 2005.