PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aemPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalAEM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 January; 76(1): 347–351.
Published online 2009 October 30. doi:  10.1128/AEM.01186-09
PMCID: PMC2798655

Benthic Bacterial Diversity in Submerged Sinkhole Ecosystems[down-pointing small open triangle]

Abstract

Physicochemical characterization, automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) community profiling, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing approaches were used to study bacterial communities inhabiting submerged Lake Huron sinkholes inundated with hypoxic, sulfate-rich groundwater. Photosynthetic cyanobacterial mats on the sediment surface were dominated by Phormidium autumnale, while deeper, organically rich sediments contained diverse and active bacterial communities.

Groundwater intrusion is becoming recognized as an important source of nutrients, contaminants, and trace elements in aquatic ecosystems (7). Recent reports regarding marine habitats suggest that groundwater influences nitrogen inputs (29) and may have a significant impact on nutrient dynamics over seasonal (27) and longer (25) time scales. To date, investigations of groundwater effects have focused primarily on marine habitats. To better understand the impact of groundwater intrusion into freshwater habitats, we have been studying submerged sinkholes in the Laurentian Great Lakes.

Sinkholes typically develop in areas of terrestrial karst when underground caverns collapse (36). We recently discovered submerged sinkholes that occur beneath the surface of Lake Huron in water up to a depth of 93 m (9, 41). These unique habitats are formed by groundwater dissolution of Paleozoic limestone and marine evaporite sediments in the Michigan Basin (16). Some sinkholes actively release cold, dense groundwater through underwater vents onto the lake floor. The venting groundwater has a lower pH (~7.1), higher specific conductivity (~2.3 mS·cm−1, due to high levels of dissolved sulfate [>1,000 mg·liter−1], carbonate, and chloride ions), and lower concentrations of dissolved oxygen (<0.4 mg·liter−1) and nitrate than Lake Huron water (2, 3, 41, 42). The intrusion of cold, hypoxic, sulfate-rich groundwater greatly alters the local lake habitat and has a significant impact on the sediment microbial community. Sediments at nearby control sites are sandy, but submerged sinkhole sediments (with carbon accounting for 5 to 35% of the sediment dry weight) are rich in organic matter originating from phytoplankton in the overlying water column (S. C. Nold, M. J. Bellecourt, B. A. Biddanda, S. C. Kendall, S. A. Ruberg, and J. V. Klump, submitted for publication). In sunlit sinkholes, organically rich sediments are covered by purple-pigmented cyanobacterial mats—vertically stratified communities composed of interdependent layers of phototrophic, chemotrophic, and heterotrophic microorganisms (35).

While the Laurentian Great Lakes are important freshwater resources, there are remarkably few molecular surveys of their microbial communities and no surveys of such communities in submerged sinkhole habitats. Here, we describe the physicochemical conditions and microbial inhabitants in the sediments of two submerged sinkholes near Alpena, MI (3) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). El Cajon sinkhole, located in Misery Bay, is a small, shallow (<1-m-deep), near-shore spring that receives full sunlight. In contrast, the deeper (23-m) Middle Island sinkhole experiences ~5% surface irradiance and affects a large (>1-ha) area of the lake floor. This study characterizes microbial communities that are unique within the Laurentian Great Lakes and are composed largely of novel, uncultivated microorganisms, some of which may represent new lineages. We detected primarily cyanobacteria similar to Antarctic Phormidium autumnale strains that likely grow as sulfide-oxidizing autotrophs. We also detected proteobacterial lineages and members of the Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Chloroflexi that likely participate in the sulfur and carbon cycles, consistent with physicochemical gradients present in the habitat.

Briefly (methods are described in detail in the supplemental material), pore water chemistry data were obtained from sections of extruded sediment cores. Profiles of bacterial community composition were obtained using the automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) technique (15, 58). We used PCR to amplify the entire 16S rRNA gene and the intervening transcribed spacer (ITS) region between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes from DNA extracted from sinkhole sediment and cyanobacterial mat samples. Clone libraries were constructed, and full-length sequence data were obtained.

Cyanobacterial mat samples collected from rocks at El Cajon Spring and Middle Island sinkhole displayed a thin (<0.5-cm-thick) layer of purple filamentous cyanobacteria with minimal accumulation of organic material beneath. Middle Island sediment samples contained a similar surface mat but displayed distinct vertical layering of microbial species overlying thick (>2-m), organically rich sediments (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Sediment pore water profiles suggest that sulfate is the dominant electron acceptor in the habitat, as the water column is hypoxic (41) and NO3-N concentrations were just above detectable levels (Fig. (Fig.1).1). A reproducible decline in sulfate concentrations within the carbonate-rich mineral layer (0.3 to 0.5 cm) was detected (Fig. (Fig.1).1). The simultaneous removal of sulfate and organic acids in this layer provides evidence of sulfate reduction. The accumulation of carbonate-rich minerals further supports sulfidogenesis since sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) can form carbonate layers in marine stromatolites (26, 40). SRB are important in the mineralization of organic carbon in marine sediments (24), but low sulfate concentrations in freshwater limit sulfidogenesis in typical Great Lakes sediments (48). Sinkhole sediments, however, are continuously supplied with sulfate by groundwater advection (41), allowing an active sulfur cycle. In addition to sulfate reduction, sulfur oxidation likely occurs, as white filamentous bacteria morphologically similar to Beggiatoa or Epsilonproteobacteria species were observed just below the cyanobacterial layer (Fig. (Fig.1)1) (14). Cyanobacteria may also participate in the sulfur cycle, growing via anoxygenic photosynthesis using SRB-produced sulfide as an electron donor (8, 45). At depths of >7 cm, sulfate was absent from the sediment, allowing methanogenesis to occur (52) and resulting in the accumulation of methane at sediment depths of >5 cm (Fig. (Fig.1).1). The depletion of methane and organic acids at depths of <5 cm (Fig. (Fig.1)1) indicates the occurrence of anaerobic methane oxidation. This process is frequently observed in concert with sulfate reduction due to a syntrophic association between methane-consuming Archaea and SRB based on interspecies electron transfer (33, 49, 51).

FIG. 1.
Schematic drawing of sediment architecture and corresponding pore water chemistry profiles for organically rich Middle Island sinkhole sediments.

Cyanobacterial mat samples from the two sites exhibited similar ARISA community profiles that were distinct from those of sediment samples (Fig. (Fig.2).2). Mat communities were dominated by sequences with an ITS length of 837 bp, characteristic of cyanobacterial gene sequences (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Mat clone libraries were also dominated by cyanobacterial sequences (Fig. (Fig.3;3; see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Due to the long ITS regions in cyanobacteria, PCR amplification results may be biased against cyanobacteria (1, 22), underestimating the actual abundance of these organisms in the surface mat community. Most cyanobacterial sequences were similar to sequences from P. autumnale and its relatives (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Phormidium strains have been found in Australia, the Bahamas, Greece, Antarctica, and Yellowstone National Park (5, 11, 54) and are capable of anoxygenic photosynthesis using sulfide as an electron donor (17). Clone TS-36-39 is closely related (98% similar) to a P. autumnale strain cultivated from permanently ice-covered Antarctic lakes (10, 46, 47). The high degree of similarity between Lake Huron and Antarctic strains is intriguing and may provide insights into the distributional ecology of cyanobacterial species, especially those adapted to cold, sulfidic groundwater environments.

FIG. 2.
Correspondence analysis ordination for ARISA community profiles from Lake Huron sinkhole mat and sediment environments. •, Middle Island mat; ○, Middle Island sediment; [filled triangle], El Cajon mat; [open triangle], El Cajon sediment.
FIG. 3.
Relative abundances of 16S rRNA gene clone types retrieved from Lake Huron sinkhole environments. (A) Composite analysis of cyanobacterial mat samples retrieved from El Cajon and Middle Island sinkholes; (B) analysis of an integrated sediment sample from ...

Compared to mat samples, sediment samples obtained from the 0- to 2-cm-depth interval displayed increased levels of clone diversity with broad representation of many lineages (Fig. (Fig.3;3; see Table S2 in the supplemental material). While the vast majority of the most closely related sequences in the GenBank database were from uncultivated environmental organisms whose ecosystem functions are unknown (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), some comparisons may help us understand community activity (34). Previous studies of sulfidic environments have focused on terrestrial landscapes, namely, caves (e.g., those described in references 14 and 39) and surface springs (e.g., those described in references 12, 28, and 38). The reports of these studies identify novel bacterial sequences, especially from the Epsilonproteobacteria, that may function to oxidize sulfur compounds and hasten the dissolution of carbonate-bearing rocks (6). The Epsilonproteobacteria we detected were similar to others from groundwater group I, sulfur-oxidizing organisms found in cold sulfidic springs that have been implicated in speleogenesis (13). Other sinkhole microorganisms likely participate in the sulfur cycle, especially Gamma- and Deltaproteobacteria, whose closest relatives belong to genera capable of sulfur metabolism, and Cyanobacteria, which use sulfide as an electron donor during anoxygenic photosynthesis. Clones CS-42-12 and AS-39-1 are related to obligately fermentative Clostridium strains of the Firmicutes (56). Their sinkhole counterparts may also act as heterotrophs. None of the retrieved clones were identical to known SRB, but Deltaproteobacteria and some Gram-positive strains are known to reduce sulfate (4, 39a). Other phyla we detected (Verrucomicrobia, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes) are common in aquatic habitats (18, 31, 32, 53, 59), but the ecological functions performed by these organisms are less well understood.

Sinkhole sediments were more diverse and displayed higher degrees of species evenness than overlying mat communities (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Species diversity rarefaction curves reflect these differences (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Rarefaction analysis likely underestimates overall diversity (21, 23), but after the acknowledgment of biases due to methodological differences, it does allow us to examine relative differences between habitats. Species diversity within sinkhole sediments is similar to that in marine sediments (43) and that of bacterioplankton collected from near-shore sites in Lake Michigan (30). The degree of sinkhole sediment diversity is still lower than the degree of microbial diversity found in typical farm soils (50). Surface cyanobacterial mats display a relatively low level of species diversity, similar to that in oligotrophic seawater (43) and that of the phytoplankton community found in a humic lake (19).

Studies of bacterial diversity in the Laurentian Great Lakes include descriptions of bacterioplankton (20, 30, 57) and picoplankton (37) communities. An oligonucleotide probe study found that picoplankton communities in all the Great Lakes except Lake Superior were similar; in Lake Superior, a more unique epilimnetic community was found (37). There are two descriptions of Great Lakes community composition based on 16S rRNA clone library techniques. In one study, near-shore Lake Michigan bacterioplankton communities were found to contain primarily Betaproteobacteria (30) but also included other common freshwater organisms. Another study investigating the chemocline of hypoxic waters in Lake Erie found communities dominated by Synechococcus and Cyanobium (57). While existing Great Lakes clone libraries do display differences between lakes and between epilimnetic and hypolimnetic waters, representation of phylogenetic groups in these libraries does not differ significantly from that in libraries from other freshwater habitats of equivalent trophic status (32, 59). In contrast, Lake Huron sinkhole environments differ significantly from the open lake, and our clone libraries reflect the uniqueness of these habitats. Sinkhole sediments were dominated by cyanobacteria but also contained a unique combination of phylogenetic groups that included an abundance of Bacteroidetes and Chloroflexi clones in addition to the more typical Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobiales. Freshwater sediments generally contain greater proportions of Deltaproteobacteria and Acidobacteria than bacterioplankton communities (44), but only one Acidobacteria clone was detected in our library (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Overall, the relative abundances of phylogenetic clusters within sinkhole clone libraries appear to be unique within the Laurentian Great Lakes. While most of our clones were closely related to sequences previously retrieved from aquatic habitats, including aquifers and freshwater sediments (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), some clones (e.g., Chloroflexi clones AM-45-7, TS-45-5, and AS-39-5; Firmicutes clone AS-39-1; and Verrucomicrobiales clone CS-42-3) were only distantly related. Such sequences may represent new lineages of groundwater-adapted strains.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The 16S rRNA gene and ITS region sequences have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers GQ406144 to GQ406203.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge dive support from Russ Green, Joe Hoyt, Tane Casserly, and Wayne Lusardi of the NOAA Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Sediment pore water chemistry was analyzed by Brian Scull at Grand Valley State University. The clone libraries were generated and screened by an undergraduate Cell and Molecular Biology I class at the University of Wisconsin—Stout under close supervision by one of the authors (S.C.N.). The contributions of three anonymous reviewers are greatly appreciated.

This work was supported by grants from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Ocean Exploration (NA07OAR4320006 to Steven A. Ruberg at the Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory) and the National Science Foundation (MCB-0604158 to S.C.N. and MCB-0603944 to B.A.B.).

Footnotes

[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 30 October 2009.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

1. Becker, S., P. Boger, R. Oehlmann, and A. Ernst. 2000. PCR bias in ecological analysis: a case study for quantitative Taq nuclease assays in analyses of microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4945-4953. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Biddanda, B. A., D. F. Coleman, T. H. Johengen, S. A. Ruberg, G. A. Meadows, H. W. Van Sumeren, R. R. Rediske, and S. T. Kendall. 2006. Exploration of a submerged sinkhole ecosystem in Lake Huron. Ecosystems 9:828-842.
3. Biddanda, B. A., S. C. Nold, S. A. Ruberg, S. T. Kendall, T. G. Sanders, and J. J. Gray. 2009. Great Lakes sinkholes: a microbiogeochemical frontier. EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 90:61-68.
4. Boschker, H. T. S., S. C. Nold, P. Wellsbury, D. Bos, W. de Graaf, R. Pel, R. J. Parkes, and T. E. Cappenberg. 1998. Direct linking of microbial populations to specific biogeochemical processes by 13C-labelling of biomarkers. Nature 392:801-805.
5. Browne, K. M., S. Golubic, and L. Seong-Joo. 2000. Shallow marine microbial carbonate deposits, p. 233-249. In R. E. Riding and S. M. Awramik (ed.), Microbial sediments. Springer, New York, NY.
6. Campbell, B. J., A. S. Engel, M. L. Porter, and K. Takai. 2006. The versatile epsilon-proteobacteria: key players in sulphidic habitats. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:458-468. [PubMed]
7. Church, T. M. 1996. An underground route for the water cycle. Nature 380:579-580.
8. Cohen, Y., B. B. Jorgensen, N. P. Revsbech, and R. Poplawski. 1986. Adaptation to hydrogen sulfide of oxygenic and anoxygenic photosynthesis among cyanobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51:398-407. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Coleman, D. F. 2002. Underwater archaeology in Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Lake Huron: preliminary results from a shipwreck mapping survey. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 36:33-44.
10. Comte, K., M. Sabacka, A. Carre-Mlouka, J. Elster, and J. Komarek. 2007. Relationships between the Arctic and the Antarctic cyanobacteria: three Phormidium-like strains evaluated by a polyphasic approach. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 59:366-376. [PubMed]
11. Cowan, D. A., and L. A. Tow. 2004. Endangered Antarctic environments. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 58:649-690. [PubMed]
12. Elshahed, M. S., J. M. Senko, F. Z. Najar, S. M. Kenton, B. A. Roe, T. A. Dewers, J. R. Spear, and L. R. Krumhoz. 2003. Bacterial diversity and sulfur cycling in a mesophilic sulfide-rich spring. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:5609-5621. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Engel, A. S. 2007. Observations on the biodiversity of sulfidic karst habitats. J. Cave Karst Stud. 69:187-206.
14. Engel, A. S., N. Lee, M. L. Porter, L. A. Stern, P. C. Bennett, and M. Wagner. 2003. Filamentous “Epsilonproteobacteria” dominate microbial mats from sulfidic cave springs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:5503-5511. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Fisher, M. M., and E. W. Triplett. 1999. Automated approach for ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of microbial diversity and its application to freshwater bacterial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4630-4636. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Gardner, W. C. 1974. Middle Devonian stratigraphy and depositional environments in the Michigan Basin. Michigan Basin Geological Society, Lansing, MI.
17. Garlick, S., A. Oren, and E. Padan. 1977. Occurrence of facultative anoxygenic photosynthesis among filamentous and unicellular cyanobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 129:623-629. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Glockner, F. O., E. Zaichikov, N. Belkova, L. Denissova, J. Pernthaler, A. Pernthaler, and R. Amann. 2000. Comparative 16s rRNA analysis of lake bacterioplankton reveals globally distributed phylogenetic clusters including an abundant group of actinobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:5053-5065. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Graham, J. M., A. D. Kent, G. H. Lauster, A. C. Yannarell, L. E. Graham, and E. W. Triplett. 2004. Seasonal dynamics of phytoplankton and planktonic protozoan communities in a northern temperate humic lake: diversity in a dinoflagellate dominated system. Microb. Ecol. 48:528-540. [PubMed]
20. Hicks, R. E., P. Aas, and C. Jankovich. 2004. Annual and offshore changes in bacterioplankton communities in the western arm of Lake Superior during 1989 and 1990. J. Great Lakes Res. 30:196-213.
21. Hong, S. H., J. Bunge, S. O. Jeon, and S. S. Epstein. 2006. Predicting microbial species richness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:117-122. [PubMed]
22. Huber, J. A., H. G. Morrison, S. M. Huse, P. R. Neal, M. L. Sogin, and D. B. M. Welch. 2009. Effect of PCR amplicon size on assessments of clone library microbial diversity and community structure. Environ. Microbiol. 11:1292-1302. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Hughes, J. B., J. J. Hellmann, T. H. Ricketts, and B. J. M. Bohannan. 2001. Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4399-4406. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Jorgensen, B. B. 1982. Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed—the role of sulphate reduction. Nature 296:643-645.
25. Knauth, L. P., and M. J. Kennedy. 2009. The late Precambrian greening of the earth. Nature 460:728-732. [PubMed]
26. Macintyre, I. G., L. Prufert-Bebout, and R. P. Reid. 2000. The role of endolithic cyanobacteria in the formation of lithified laminae in Bahamian stromatolites. Sedimentology 47:915-921.
27. Michael, H. A., A. E. Mulligan, and C. F. Harvey. 2005. Seasonal oscillations in water exchange between aquifers and the coastal ocean. Nature 436:1145-1148. [PubMed]
28. Moissl, C., C. Rudolph, and R. Huber. 2002. Natural communities of novel archaea and bacteria with a string-of-pearls-like morphology: molecular analysis of the bacterial partners. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:933-937. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Moore, W. S., J. L. Sarmiento, and R. M. Key. 2008. Submarine groundwater discharge revealed by Ra-228 distribution in the upper Atlantic Ocean. Nat. Geosci. 1:309-311.
30. Mueller-Spitz, S. R., G. W. Goetz, and S. L. McLellan. 2009. Temporal and spatial variability in nearshore bacterioplankton communities of Lake Michigan. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 67:511-522. [PubMed]
31. Newton, R. J., S. E. Jones, M. R. Helmus, and K. D. McMahon. 2007. Phylogenetic ecology of the freshwater Actinobacteria acI lineage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:7169-7176. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Nold, S. C., and G. Zwart. 1998. Patterns and governing forces in aquatic microbial communities. Aquat. Ecol. 32:17-35.
33. Orphan, V. J., C. House, K.-U. Hinrichs, K. D. McKeegan, and E. F. DeLong. 2001. Methane-consuming archaea revealed by directly coupled isotopic and phylogenetic analysis. Science 293:484-486. [PubMed]
34. Pace, N. R. 1997. A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 276:734-740. [PubMed]
35. Paerl, H. W., and J. L. Pinckney. 1996. A mini-review of microbial consortia: their roles in aquatic production and biogeochemical cycling. Microb. Ecol. 31:225-247. [PubMed]
36. Palmer, A. N. 1991. Origin and morphology of limestone caves. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 103:1-21.
37. Pascoe, D. A., and R. E. Hicks. 2004. Genetic structure and community DNA similarity of picoplankton communities from the Laurentian Great Lakes. J. Great Lakes Res. 30:185-195.
38. Perreault, N. N., C. W. Greer, D. T. Andersen, S. Tille, G. Lacrampe-Couloume, B. S. Lollar, and L. G. Whyte. 2008. Heterotrophic and autotrophic microbial populations in cold perennial springs of the high Arctic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:6898-6907. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Porter, M. L., and A. S. Engel. 2008. Diversity of uncultured Epsilonproteobacteria from terrestrial sulfidic caves and springs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:4973-4977. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39a. Rabus, R., T. A. Hansen, and F. Widdel. 2006. Dissimilatory sulfate-and sulfur-reducing prokaryotes, p. 659-768. In M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, K.-H. Schleifer, and E. Stackebrandt (ed.), The prokaryotes, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Springer, New York, NY.
40. Reid, R. P., P. T. Visscher, A. W. Decho, J. F. Stolz, B. M. Bebout, C. Dupraz, L. G. Macintyre, H. W. Paerl, J. L. Pinckney, L. Prufert-Bebout, T. F. Steppe, and D. J. DesMarais. 2000. The role of microbes in accretion, lamination and early lithification of modern marine stromatolites. Nature 406:989-992. [PubMed]
41. Ruberg, S. A., D. E. Coleman, T. H. Johengen, G. A. Meadows, H. W. Van Sumeren, G. A. Lang, and B. A. Biddanda. 2005. Groundwater plume mapping in a submerged sinkhole in Lake Huron. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 39:65-69.
42. Ruberg, S. A., S. T. Kendall, B. A. Biddanda, T. Black, S. C. Nold, W. Lusardi, T. Casserley, E. Smith, T. G. Sanders, G. Lang, and S. Constant. 2008. Observations of the Middle Island sinkhole in Lake Huron: a unique hydrologic and glacial creation of 400 million years. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 42:12-21.
43. Santelli, C. M., B. N. Orcutt, E. Banning, W. Bach, C. L. Moyer, M. L. Sogin, H. Staudigel, and K. J. Edwards. 2008. Abundance and diversity of microbial life in ocean crust. Nature 453:653-656. [PubMed]
44. Spring, S., R. Schulze, J. Overmann, and K. H. Schleifer. 2000. Identification and characterization of ecologically significant prokaryotes in the sediment of freshwater lakes: molecular and cultivation studies. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 24:573-590. [PubMed]
45. Stal, L. J. 1995. Physiological ecology of cyanobacteria in microbial mats and other communities. New Phytol. 131:1-32.
46. Taton, A., S. Grubisic, P. Balthasart, D. A. Hodgson, J. Laybourn-Parry, and A. Wilmotte. 2006. Biogeographical distribution and ecological ranges of benthic cyanobacteria in East Antarctic lakes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 57:272-289. [PubMed]
47. Taton, A., S. Grubisic, D. Ertz, D. A. Hodgson, R. Piccardi, N. Biondi, M. R. Tredici, M. Mainini, D. Losi, F. Marinelli, and A. Wilmotte. 2006. Polyphasic study of Antarctic cyanobacterial strains. J. Phycol. 42:1257-1270.
48. Thomsen, U., B. Thamdrup, D. A. Stahl, and D. E. Canfield. 2004. Pathways of organic carbon oxidation in a deep lacustrine sediment, Lake Michigan. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49:2046-2057.
49. Treude, T., V. Orphan, K. Knittel, A. Gieske, C. House, and A. Boetius. 2007. Consumption of methane and CO2 by methanotrophic microbial mats from gas seeps of the anoxic Black Sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:2271-2283. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Tringe, S. G., C. von Mering, A. Kobayashi, A. A. Salamov, K. Chen, H. W. Chang, M. Podar, J. M. Short, E. J. Mathur, J. C. Detter, P. Bork, P. Hugenholtz, and E. M. Rubin. 2005. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science 308:554-557. [PubMed]
51. Valentine, D. L. 2002. Biogeochemistry and microbial ecology of methane oxidation in anoxic environments: a review. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81:271-282. [PubMed]
52. Ward, D. M., and M. R. Winfrey. 1985. Interactions between methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria in sediments, p. 219-286. In H. W. Jannasch and P. J. L. Williams (ed.), Advances in microbial ecology. Plenum Press, New York, NY.
53. Warnecke, F., R. Amann, and J. Pernthaler. 2004. Actinobacterial 16S rRNA genes from freshwater habitats cluster in four distinct lineages. Environ. Microbiol. 6:242-253. [PubMed]
54. Weller, D., W. N. Doemel, and T. D. Brock. 1975. Requirement of low oxidation-reduction potential for photosynthesis in a blue-green alga (Phormidium sp.). Arch. Microbiol. 104:7-13. [PubMed]
55. Reference deleted.
56. Wiegel, J., R. Tanner, and F. A. Rainey. 2006. An introduction to the family Clostridiaceae, p. 654-678. In M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, K.-H. Schleifer, and E. Stackebrandt (ed.), The prokaryotes, 3rd ed., vol. 4. Springer, New York, NY.
57. Wilhelm, S. W., G. S. Bullerjahn, M. L. Eldridge, J. M. Rinta-Kanto, L. Poorvin, and R. A. Bourbonniere. 2006. Seasonal hypoxia and the genetic diversity of prokaryote populations in the central basin hypolimnion of Lake Erie: evidence for abundant cyanobacteria and photosynthesis. J. Great Lakes Res. 32:657-671.
58. Yannarell, A. C., and E. W. Triplett. 2005. Geographic and environmental sources of variation in lake bacterial community composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:227-239. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Zwart, G., B. C. Crump, M. P. K. V. Agterveld, F. Hagen, and S. K. Han. 2002. Typical freshwater bacteria: an analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences from plankton of lakes and rivers. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 28:141-155.

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)