Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jvirolPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJV ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
J Virol. 2010 January; 84(1): 407–417.
Published online 2009 October 21. doi:  10.1128/JVI.01303-09
PMCID: PMC2798422

Novel Approach to the Formulation of an Epstein-Barr Virus Antigen-Based Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Vaccine [down-pointing small open triangle]


Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with several malignant diseases including nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a common neoplasm throughout southeast Asia. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy can achieve remission, but a reemergence of disease is not uncommon. Therefore, there is a need for specific therapies that target the tumor through the recognition of EBV antigens. In NPC, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) and LMP2 offer the best opportunity for specific targeting since they are typically expressed and T-cell determinants in each of these proteins have been defined. We have attempted to maximize the opportunity of incorporating every possible CD4 and CD8 determinant in a single formulation. We have achieved this by generating a scrambled protein incorporating random overlapping peptide sets from EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2, which was then inserted into a replication-deficient strain of adenovirus (adenovirus scrambled antigen vaccine [Ad-SAVINE]). This report describes the construction of this Ad-SAVINE construct, its utility in generating LMP1 and LMP2 responses in healthy individuals as well as NPC patients, and its capacity to define new epitopes. This formulation could have a role in NPC immunotherapy for all ethnic groups since it has the potential to activate all possible CD4 and CD8 responses within EBNA1 and LMPs.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a member of the herpesvirus family and is one of the most common human viruses. It occurs worldwide, and most people become infected with the virus sometime during their lives. EBV is associated with a range of neoplasms. These include various B- and T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas such as posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), and several lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas, of which nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the archetype (1). The association of the virus with these malignancies and its oncogenic potential have been well established (19).

Worldwide, NPC is characterized epidemiologically by foci of relatively high endemicity in certain geographic regions including southern China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, the Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam, Kenya, Tunisia, Sudan, and Uganda. The reason for the focal distribution of NPC is uncertain, although genetics and environmental factors have been suggested to be causes (14, 49).

Currently, the mainstay for the treatment of NPC is radiation and chemotherapy. Indeed, this treatment is frequently successful when the extent of the tumor is small and confined. However, when disease is advanced at diagnosis and where metastatic spread has become apparent, more radical treatments may need to be adopted, including surgery. In either case, all these treatments are associated with severe short- and long-term side effects including secondary malignancies (16). Hence, there is a need for specific therapies that target the tumor itself rather than therapies that are associated with the destruction of normal tissue.

Virus-associated malignancies offer a distinct advantage in this regard since therapy can be directed specifically toward viral proteins expressed in the tumor, thus avoiding collateral damage to normal tissue. This has been dramatically demonstrated in the case of PTLD, where the adoptive transfer of EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) activated in vitro by using autologous lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) has resulted in a resolution of disease with a very low frequency of side effects (9, 18, 40). In this case, it is likely that the effector cells infused into these patients are directed mainly toward the dominant EBV nuclear antigen 3A (EBNA3A), EBNA3B, and EBNA3C. The concept of immunological intervention as a treatment option for NPC is greatly enhanced by a range of previously reported studies that indicated the presence of transport-associated proteins (TAP1 and TAP2) and major histocompatibility complex class I and class II in NPC (23, 37, 42, 48), all of which are required for efficient CTL recognition. In NPC, EBNA1, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), and LMP2 offer the best opportunity for specific targeting since these are the only EBV proteins expressed in this malignancy. This is particularly so in the case of immunotherapy since defined CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell determinants in each of these proteins have been defined (12, 15, 20, 31). However, the CTL response in the case of the LMPs is relatively weak (particularly LMP1), and the glycine-alanine repeat sequence within EBNA1 may affect immunological processing (29), although this may not be the absolute barrier that was first hypothesized (46). Recent studies have provided some encouragement that immunotherapeutic intervention may be a realistic treatment option for NPC (4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 30, 43, 45). For example, Straathof et al. (43) and Comoli et al. (10) adoptively transferred effector cells expanded in vitro by using LCLs to activate CTLs in patients with advanced NPC, resulting in some cases in the resolution of disease, although in other cases, efficacy was limited and transient (3). Those studies, however, have provided a promising hint that the immunotherapeutic control of NPC might be feasible.

Indeed, recent studies have shown that multiple human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A2-restricted LMP1 CTL epitopes, when used as a polyepitope vaccine in a poxvirus vector, efficiently induced a strong CTL response, and this response could reverse the outgrowth of LMP1-expressing tumors in HLA-A2/Kb mice (13). The poxvirus-based LMP1-polyepitope vaccine tested in these studies contained only HLA A2-restricted epitopes, and targeting just one HLA allele will not be suitable for all ethnic groups. If a CTL-based therapy for NPC is to be universally applicable, the target epitopes must bind to a range of HLA alleles preferably present at a high frequency in patient populations and include determinants irrespective of whether they have previously been defined.

It is likely that the essential difference between the very successful treatment of patients with PTLD and the partial success in the case of NPC is that in the former case, immunodominant targets are available, while in the latter case, only relatively weak responses are seen even for healthy individuals. The present communication has arisen in an attempt to maximize the possibility of activating a response toward the three proteins present in NPC rather than skewing the effector population toward the immunodominant EBNA3A, -B, and -C proteins. We have achieved this by generating a “scrambled-antigen vaccine” (referred to as SAVINE) incorporating random overlapping peptide sets from EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2. This SAVINE has been incorporated into a replication-deficient adenovirus (Ad5/F35) as a 6.9-kb insert (Ad-SAVINE). An important feature of the Ad-SAVINE strategy is that it provides a platform for the activation of all possible immunological determinants (including helper cells and CTLs) within EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2 and should be applicable to all populations for which NPC is endemic. This report describes the construction of this Ad-SAVINE construct and its utility in generating LMP1 and LMP2 responses from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy individuals and NPC patients.


All of the work presented in this publication was approved by the institutional Human Research Ethics Committee, which conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki. Human blood from healthy individuals and NPC patients was collected with the appropriate approved consent form.

Construction of the synthetic NPC Ad-SAVINE construct.

The SAVINE vaccine was designed and constructed by using methods previously used to construct a human immunodeficiency virus SAVINE (47). The SAVINE incorporates the LMP1 sequence from the Cao isolate of EBV identified from a Chinese NPC (GenBank accession number AF304432), while the LMP2a and EBNA1 protein sequences were obtained from a common EBV A strain sequence assembled from EBV B95-8 (GenBank accession number AJ507799). Deletions were made to the EBNA1 and LMP1 sequences corresponding to the Gly-Ala repeat and Arg-Gly amino acids 95 to 377 in EBNA1 and five copies of the 11-amino-acid tandem repeat at amino acids 260 to 315 in LMP1. The separated sequences of EBNA1 and LMP1 were then regarded as separate proteins during the rest of the design process.

To design synthetic SAVINE cDNA, the protein sequences were fragmented into overlapping peptides (30 amino acids overlapping by 15 amino acids), which were reverse translated into codon-optimized DNA by using the first and second most common mammalian codons alternating differently in peptide overlaps to reduce cDNA sequence duplication. The DNA sequences were then randomly “scrambled” on the computer, and a SAVINE sequence was assembled. The only restriction to this random reassembly of a 30-amino-acid sequence was that no two DNA sequences were joined so that they would encode a larger fragment (<30 amino acids) corresponding to the original parent protein sequence. Additional restriction enzyme site start and stop codons as well as a Kozac sequence were added to aid translation and subsequent cloning.

The SAVINE cDNA was synthesized by using long oligonucleotides from Invitrogen, asymmetric PCR, stepwise overlap extension, and restriction site-directed ligation as described previously (47) to make a 6,863-bp cDNA fragment (Fig. (Fig.1).1). The cDNA was then cloned into pShuttle (Clontech) and used to generate a recombinant replication-deficient adenovirus vaccine (Ad-SAVINE) based on the altered fiber adenovirus Ad5/F35 by using previously reported techniques (11, 34).

FIG. 1.
Schematic description of the construction of the Ad-SAVINE vaccine. Shown is the construction of a recombinant adenovirus (Ad5/F35) that expresses a synthetic DNA encoding a scrambled protein that contains LMP1, LMP2, and EBNA epitopes. To design the ...

Establishment and maintenance of cell lines.

LCLs were established from EBV-seropositive donors by exogenous virus transformation of peripheral B cells by using the B95-8 virus isolate in the presence of cyclosporine (Novartis). These cells were routinely maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 IU/ml of penicillin, and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin plus 10% fetal calf serum (FCS).

To generate phytohemagglutinin (PHA) blasts, PBMCs were stimulated with PHA (CSL Ltd., Melbourne, Australia), and after 3 days of culture, growth medium containing MLA 144 supernatant and highly purified recombinant human interleukin-2 (rIL-2) was added. PHA blasts were propagated by a twice-weekly replacement of rIL-2 and MLA supernatant for up to 6 weeks.

Generation of EBV-specific CTL cultures. (i) Autologous LCL activation.

LMP-specific CTLs were generated from a panel of healthy virus carriers and NPC patients by stimulating PBMCs with autologous EBV-transformed LCLs. Briefly, 2 × 106 PBMCs were cocultured with gamma-irradiated LCLs in a 24-well plate at a responder-to-stimulator ratio of 2:1 for 7 days. These cultures were restimulated weekly with gamma-irradiated autologous LCLs (ratio, 30:1), and the growth medium was supplemented with rIL-2 (20 IU/ml).

(ii) Ad-SAVINE activation.

CTLs were established by using PBMCs infected for 1 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 with the Ad-SAVINE construct at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50:1 and added to uninfected PBMCs at a 1:2 ratio in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FCS and 20 IU/ml rIL-2. Cultures were restimulated weekly (for 3 weeks) with gamma-irradiated autologous LCLs that had been infected with the Ad-SAVINE construct at an MOI of 50:1. These infected LCLs were cocultivated with the cultured cells at a ratio of 1:30, and the growth medium was supplemented with rIL-2. In some cases, a cytomegalovirus (CMV) construct was used as a control of specificity (Ad-CMVpoly). Briefly, CTLs were established by using PBMCs infected for 1 h at 37°C with the Ad-CMVpoly construct (50) at an MOI of 50:1 and added to uninfected PBMCs at a 1:2 ratio in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FCS and 20 IU/ml rIL-2. Cultures were restimulated weekly with gamma-irradiated autologous LCLs that had been infected with the Ad-CMVpoly construct at an MOI of 50:1. These infected LCLs were cocultivated with the cultured cells at a ratio of 1:30, and the growth medium was supplemented with rIL-2.

(iii) Peptide activation.

CTLs were established from PBMCs that were stimulated with peptide-coated gamma-irradiated autologous LCLs (peptide concentrations of 10−5 M, 10−6 M, and 10−7 M). Cultures were restimulated weekly (for 3 weeks) with gamma-irradiated autologous LCLs that had been coated with the peptide at a ratio of 1:30.

51Cr release assays.

The ability of LMP-specific CTLs to induce lysis was analyzed in a standard 5-h chromium 51 release assay by using an effector/target ratio of 20:1. Autologous PHA target cells were incubated with LMP peptides for 1 h at 37°C in 5% CO2, washed once, and then labeled with 51Cr for 1 h at 37°C in 5% CO2, washed twice, and resuspended at 105 cells/ml in RPMI medium plus 10% FCS. A total of 104 cells were added to a 96-well plate, and effector CTLs were added at 20:1 effector/target ratios. The cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 4 h before pelleting the cells, and 25 μl of supernatant was collected into Luma-Plate 96-well plates (Packard Instrument Co.). The plates were dried and read by use of a TopCount microplate scintillation counter (Packard Instrument Co.), and the percent specific lysis was calculated by the following formula: [(mean specific release ± mean spontaneous release)/mean total release] × 100.

ELISPOT assays.

The precursor CTLs were determined by using enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) technology to detect gamma interferon (IFN-γ) secretion as described previously (2). Briefly, 96-well mixed cellulose ester membrane plates (Millipore, Bedford, MA) were coated overnight at 4°C with 100 μl/well of 10 μg/ml anti-IFN-γ capture monoclonal antibodies (clone 1-D1K; Mabtech, Stockholm, Sweden) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells (2 × 105 PBMCs or 5 × 104 cultured CTLs) were added per well in triplicate in the presence of synthetic peptides (10−5 M to 10−12 M). For negative controls, cells were incubated without peptide. The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight and then washed prior to the addition of 100 μl/well of 1 μg/ml anti-IFN-γ biotin (clone 7-B6-1; Mabtech, Stockholm, Sweden) in PBS and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. After incubation, plates were washed again, and 100 μl/well of 1 μg/ml streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate was added and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. After a final wash, BCIP (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoylphosphate)-nitroblue tetrazolium developing substrate solution (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added at 100 μl/well and kept at room temperature until individual IFN-γ-producing cells were detected as dark spots. Spots were counted automatically by using an AIDELISPOT reader (Autoimmun Diagnostika GmbH, Strassberg, Germany) and were expressed as spot-forming units.

Phenotypic analysis and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS).

The phenotype of the activated cultures was determined by labeling cells with fluorochrome-labeled mouse anti-human antibodies specific for T-cell markers. Cells (2 × 105) were washed once in fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) buffer (1× PBS, 1% FCS) and resuspended in 50 μl FACS buffer. CD4-phycoerythrin (Beckman Coulter), CD8-allophycocyanin (APC) (Pharmingen, Becton Dickinson), CD3-APC-Cy7 (Beckman Coulter), and CD56-PC5 (Beckman Coulter) were added to the cells at a 1/20 dilution, incubated on ice for 30 min, washed once, resuspended in FACS buffer, and analyzed with a FACSCanto apparatus (Becton Dickinson).

CTLs were assessed for their ability to secrete IFN-γ in response to incubation with LMP peptides by ICS. A total of 5 × 105 CTL were resuspended in 100 μl of FACS buffer with LMP peptide (10−5 M to 10−9 M, final concentration) and incubated for an hour. GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) was then added, and cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 5 h, pelleted, and washed twice in 200 μl FACS buffer. Cells were stained for surface antigens (CD4-fluorescein isothiocyanate and CD8-APC) for 30 min at 4°C and resuspended in fixation/permeabilization solution according to the manufacturer's protocol. Finally, cells were stained with anti-human IFN-γ-phycoerythrin (Pharmingen, Becton Dickinson).

Synthesis of peptides.

Peptides synthesized by the Merrifield solid-phase method were purchased from Mimotopes (Melbourne, Australia), dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, and diluted in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium for use in standard assays. The purities of these peptides were tested by mass spectrometry and showed >70% purity.

Panels of 15-mer peptides (overlapping by 10 amino acids) were synthesized, covering the entire amino acid sequence of LMP2 from the prototype EBV strain B95-8. Twenty peptide pools compromising 8, 9, or 10 15-mer peptides were prepared so that each 15-mer peptide was represented in two pools, as previously described (17). These peptide pools were used to identify a new CTL epitope within LMP2.

To identify the minimally recognized LMP2 epitope sequence, additional peptides varying in length from 8-mer, 9-mer, 10-mer, and 11-mer peptides were created.

Growth inhibition assay.

A modification of a previously described LCL growth inhibition assay (35, 38), in which the ability of Ad-SAVINE-activated T cells to inhibit the growth of autologous LCLs was tested, was used as an additional functional assay. Autologous LCLs were seeded (in triplicate) in round-bottom wells at serial dilutions running from 10,000 cells/well with or without the addition of 10,000 Ad-SAVINE-activated cells/well. In some cases, Ad-SAVINE-activated cultures were depleted of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (by Dynabeads), and 10,000 cells/well were plated with LCLs as mentioned above. Culture medium was changed weekly, and the growth, or otherwise, was scored visually at 3 weeks, with large pellets of actively growing cells indicating the successful growth of LCL and the presence of debris in wells suggesting an inhibition of growth by T cells.

Depletion with Dynabeads.

PBMCs from donors were depleted of CD4+ or CD8+ cells by using Dynabeads (Dynal, Biotech, Australia). Briefly, 107 cells were resuspended in 1 ml of PBS-2% FCS in the presence of CD4 or CD8 Dynabeads and incubated for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were then placed into a magnet, and the CD4- or CD8-depleted fraction was used for the growth inhibition assays.


Generation of an Ad-SAVINE construct.

Although it is well recognized that the CTL response to LMPs is relatively weak, previous reports from our own laboratory and other laboratories revealed that a memory response to these proteins can be activated with either defined LMP epitopes, LCLs, or an LMP polyepitope (13, 39, 41). However, these methodologies are limited because they either are restricted to specific HLA alleles (peptide epitopes and LMP polyepitope) or include dominant responses (LCLs) to non-LMPs, which are likely to mask the NPC-relevant responses (20, 36). The Ad-SAVINE vaccine has been developed in an attempt to incorporate all possible immunological determinants (CD4 and CD8) with specificity directed toward NPC and potentially applicable to all HLA types. Briefly, the Ad-SAVINE incorporates scrambled 30-mer overlapping sequences of EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2, which were subsequently reverse translated into DNA and used to create a recombinant replication-deficient adenovirus, as outlined in Fig. Fig.11.

Activation of an LMP-specific CTL response in PBMC from immune healthy donors by using the Ad-SAVINE construct.

This study has focused on a comparison between autologous LCLs and the Ad-SAVINE construct since both are potentially applicable to all HLA types and the former has been used in a number of clinical trials. In the present report we have compared the ability of the Ad-SAVINE construct to activate LMP1 and LMP2 responses compared to the response using autologous LCLs of six healthy EBV-seropositive individuals. These cultures were phenotyped on day 20, and their activity was assessed in terms of IFN-γ secretion by CD8+ T cells and lysis of peptide-coated autologous PHA blasts in 51Cr release assays. In the example shown, most of the cells were CD8+, while the levels of the CD4+ component were lower (Fig. (Fig.2A).2A). However, for the majority of donors, the dominant phenotype was CD4+ (see Table Table2).2). The functional assays using 51Cr release and IFN-γ revealed that stimulation with the Ad-SAVINE construct consistently resulted in higher levels of activation than autologous LCLs. Figure Figure22 summarizes the results of a single representative comparison between the abilities of autologous LCLs and the Ad-SAVINE construct to activate an HLA A2-restricted response in PBMCs from a healthy immune donor (donor 1 [HLA A2, A2, B44, and B60]). As can be seen in Fig. Fig.2A,2A, cultures are dominated by CD3+ cells, and for this individual, the level of the CD8+ component was higher in Ad-SAVINE cultures than in corresponding cultures activated with the autologous LCLs. Although for this particular individual, many of the CD3+ cells activated with the autologous LCLs were CD56+, considerable variation was found in other cultures set up from this individual and from other individuals. Functional studies of these cultures were assessed by ELISPOT assays and 51Cr release assays by using peptides selected on the basis of the HLA of donor blood and the reported LMP1 and LMP2 responses associated with each of these HLA types (Table (Table1).1). In the example shown in Fig. Fig.2B2B (ELISPOT) and Fig. Fig.2C2C (51Cr release), in which the HLA A2 responses were evaluated, multiple LMP1 and LMP2 specificities were activated with the Ad-SAVINE construct, while the LCLs tended to activate a more focused response. A higher-level response was also seen with epitopes restricted through other HLA types when activated with Ad-SAVINE than with autologous LCLs. In some instances, the response was tightly focused through a restricted number of epitopes, and this is likely to be related to the previously defined HLA-restricted epitopes, which, in the case of some alleles, is limited. A summary of all the data (phenotype and response by 51Cr release) from all healthy donors is included in Table Table22.

FIG. 2.
Activation and expansion of LMP-specific CTL responses after stimulation with Ad-SAVINE. PBMCs from a healthy donor (donor 1 [HLA A2, A2, B44, and B60]) were cocultured with autologous PBMCs infected with Ad-SAVINE or autologous EBV-transformed LCLs at ...
LMP1 and LMP2 epitopes and their HLA restrictionsa
Activation of PBMCs from healthy donors and NPC patients with Ad-SAVINEa

Activation of LMP-specific CTLs using PBMCs from NPC donors by using the Ad-SAVINE construct.

Having demonstrated the utility of the Ad-SAVINE construct in activating LMP responses for all of the healthy seropositive individuals tested, we sought to determine whether this formulation could also be used to activate LMP responses from NPC patients. The activities of Ad-SAVINE- and LCL-stimulated cultures from 10 different NPC patients were assessed in terms of the lysis of peptide-coated autologous PHA blasts in 51Cr release assays. Of these, LMP responses were detected for six NPC patients. As with healthy individuals, the level of activation of defined epitopes was consistently higher with the Ad-SAVINE than with autologous LCLs. Figure Figure3A3A shows one representative experiment for an NPC patient who responded to only one peptide (patient 1 [HLA A11, A24, B62, and B75]), whereas Fig. Fig.3B3B shows a representative experiment for an NPC patient that had multiple responses (patient 2 [HLA A11, A24, B18, and B62]). However, in contrast to healthy individuals, no response could be detected for four of the NPC patients tested. This is likely to be due, at least in part, to the fact that in most instances, the patients were non-Caucasian with HLA types for which few epitopes had been defined. It could also be possible that apparent responses were damped by the effect of the drugs used for the treatment of these patients. A summary of all the data (phenotype and response by 51Cr release) from all NPC patients is included in Table Table22.

FIG. 3.
Activation and expansion of LMP-specific CTLs from NPC patients after stimulation with Ad-SAVINE. PBMCs were cocultured with autologous PBMCs infected with Ad-SAVINE or autologous EBV-transformed LCLs at a responder-to-stimulator ratio of 2:1 for 7 days ...

Utility of Ad-SAVINE in activating responses in healthy individuals and NPC patients with an HLA type incompatible with previously defined HLA types.

To date, most of the epitopes have been defined with Caucasian donors. However, problems can arise when extrapolating epitope-based therapies to non-Caucasian patients, which may involve HLA types outside the spectrum of epitopes normally associated with Caucasian patients, e.g., NPC patients from Asia. To assess the use of the Ad-SAVINE formulation, which includes the complete sequence of the three relevant EBV proteins, PBMCs from an Asian NPC patient (patient 3 [HLA A3, A68, B7, and B55]) and a healthy individual (donor 2 [HLA A2, B35, and B57]) were activated with the Ad-SAVINE formulation and screened in an ELISPOT assay by using a complete set of overlapping peptides from LMP2. Representative data from ELISPOT assays using overlapping peptides for LMP2 are presented in Fig. Fig.4.4. In the case of the healthy individual (donor 2) (Fig. (Fig.4A),4A), reactivity was associated with two peptide pools (pool 1 and pool 11). The single peptide present in both pools was MGSLEMVPM (HLA B35 restricted), which corresponded to a reactivity defined previously (44). In the case of NPC patient 3, reactivity was associated with pools 6 and 13 (Fig. (Fig.4B).4B). The common peptide present in both of these pools is PVIVAPYLFWLAAIA, which includes the previously described epitope PYLFWLAAI (21), restricted by an HLA type (HLA A23/24) not present in this patient. This suggests that PVIVAPYLFWLAAIA includes a CTL response restricted through a non-HLA A23/24 allele. To confirm that there is indeed an undefined epitope within this sequence and to define its HLA restriction, we screened activated cultures from NPC patient 3 in a 51Cr release assay against a series of allogeneic PHA blasts sharing a single allele with this NPC patient in the presence or absence of the peptide (Fig. (Fig.5A).5A). Representative results show the killing of two allogeneic peptide-coated PHA blasts (patients 4 and 6), each of which shares HLA B55. In order to confirm this HLA restriction, PBMCs from this patient (patient 3) and another HLA B55 NPC patient (patient 4) were stimulated with PVIVAPYLFWLAAIA and tested in a 51Cr release assay against PHA blasts sensitized with PVIVAPYLFWLAAIA and PYLFWLAAI. PHA blasts from both NPC cases showed that the active epitope was clearly included within PVIVAPYLFWLAAIA and that only part of the reactivity was seen in PYLFWLAAI (Fig. (Fig.5B5B).

FIG. 4.
Representative data from the ELISPOT assays using overlapping peptides. Ad-SAVINE-activated cultures from virus-seropositive healthy donor 2 (A) or NPC patient 3 (B) were screened with the complete set of LMP2 overlapping peptides, and the cells that ...
FIG. 5.
HLA B55-restricted CTL recognition of an LMP2 epitope. (A) The CTL effectors from NPC patient 3 were tested against autologous PHA blasts and allogeneic PHA blasts presensitized with synthetic peptide or left uncoated. Allogeneic donors (donor 10 [HLA ...

Fine-mapping of LMP-2-specific T-cell response within PVIVAPYLFWLAAIA.

As indicated above, there is an HLA-B55 epitope within the PVIVAPYLFWLAAIA sequence. In order to define the minimal epitope contained in this 15-mer sequence, a series of 11-mer, 10-mer, 9-mer, and 8-mer overlapping truncations was synthesized and screened in a 51Cr release assay (Fig. (Fig.6A).6A). The results indicate that activity resides in four 11-mer, three 10-mer, two 9-mer, and two 8-mer sequences. To further define the minimal epitope, the two active 9-mer sequences (VAPYLFWLA and APYLFWLAA) and 8-mer sequences (APYLFWLA and PYLFWLAA) were titrated by using 10-fold dilutions in a 51Cr release assay (Fig. (Fig.6B).6B). The titration results indicate that maximal activity resides with the 9-mer peptide APYLFWLAA. It is interesting that maximal activity is associated with a 9-mer sequence that includes alanine at both the amino- and carboxy-terminal positions, as was previously shown for this HLA allele (6).

FIG. 6.
Mapping of a minimal novel epitope sequence using in vitro assays. Ad-SAVINE-activated cultures from NPC patient 3 were stimulated weekly, and reactivity was tested on day 20. (A) Fine-mapping of the novel epitope was achieved by using a series of truncations ...

To confirm the activity of this novel epitope, PBMCs from NPC patient 3 were cultivated in the presence of APYLFWLAA, and the functional activity was assessed by ELISPOT assay, 51Cr release assay, and intracellular staining for IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells. The results confirm the ability of this peptide to activate a peptide-specific response (Fig. (Fig.7).7). Indeed, ICS staining shows that this response is dominant, and about 37% of CD8+ T cells showed reactivity to this peptide (Fig. (Fig.7C).7C). Furthermore, the APYLFWLAA-specific T cells killed autologous LCLs and recognized a B55-matched allogeneic LCL in a 51Cr release assay (Fig. (Fig.7B).7B). In addition, these effectors recognized autologous LCLs in an ELISPOT assay (Fig. (Fig.7A7A).

FIG. 7.
Activation of the CTL lines specific for the novel epitope. Cultures from NPC patient 3 specific for this novel peptide were generated and tested in ELISPOT (A), 51Cr release (B), and ICS (C) assays, confirming that APYLFWLAA is the minimal epitope within ...

Effect of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell depletion of Ad-SAVINE-activated PBMCs on the inhibition of growth of autologous LCLs.

As indicated above, in some instances, PBMCs activated with Ad-SAVINE result in cultures in which CD4+ cells predominate. To determine the potential effector role of CD4+ and CD8+ cells in such cultures, unfractionated, CD8+, or CD4+ T-cell-depleted activated PBMCs were tested for their abilities to limit the growth of various numbers of autologous LCLs. PBMCs were activated with the Ad-SAVINE construct, and after 2 weeks, either CD4 or CD8 depletions were performed, and these cells were used in the limiting growth assay. These experiments involved two donors whose activated cultures regularly resulted in a predominance of CD4+ cells (donor 3 [HLA A24, A29, B44, and B44] and donor 7 [HLA A28, A32, B12, and B12]). The experiment presented in Table Table33 was repeated twice, and on each occasion, similar results were obtained with both donors. The results indicated that LCL cultures grew at all cell numbers in the absence of added activated cells. Unfractionated Ad-SAVINE-activated cultures restricted the growth of autologous LCLs (Table (Table3)3) but not allogeneic LCLs (data not shown). An investigation of the phenotype responsible for this inhibition revealed that most of the inhibitory activity was included in CD8-depleted cultures. Indeed, when this assay was performed by using allogeneic LCLs sharing a single class II allele, comparable results were obtained, while on the other hand, little inhibition was seen when using allogeneic LCLs without any class II sharing (data not shown). Overall, it appears that in instances where there is a predominance of CD4+ cells following Ad-SAVINE activation, the CD4 component is capable of limiting the expansion of autologous LCLs.

Incidence of LCL growth with and without added Ad-SAVINE-activated autologous PBMCsa

In order to make sure that the effect seen was not related to an adenovirus response, cultures were activated with the CMV-adenovirus construct (Ad-CMVpoly) and used in the outgrowth assay. Table Table44 shows a minimal inhibition of outgrowth of autologous LCLs when activating responses with this control adenovirus. Furthermore, no inhibition of outgrowth of allogeneic LCLs was seen (data not shown). Moreover, when these cultures were used in a 51Cr release assay, Ad-SAVINE-activated cultures killed autologous LCLs, while Ad-CMVpoly-activated cultures showed a much reduced killing of autologous LCLs. In addition, only the Ad-SAVINE-activated cultures could recognize and kill LMP- and EBNA1-primed autologous PHA blasts (Fig. (Fig.8).8). Thus, the effect seen with Ad-SAVINE is specific for the sequences included in the SAVINE construct and is not associated with an adenovirus response or other nonspecific mechanisms.

FIG. 8.
Specificity of the response of Ad-SAVINE- and Ad-CMVpoly-activated cultures. Ad-SAVINE- and Ad-CMVpoly-activated cultures from a healthy donor were tested for specificity in a 51Cr release assay against autologous PHA blasts coated with LMP and EBNA1 ...
Incidence of LCL growth with and without added Ad-SAVINE- or Ad-CMVpoly-activated autologous PBMCsa


EBV gene expression in NPC and HL is limited to EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2. Potentially, each of these proteins is available for CTL targeting, although the response to LMP1 is generally weak (32), and the functional response to EBNA1 is controversial. In spite of the relative precursor frequency of the CTL response to each of these proteins, the notion that successful therapy might be based on boosting each of these (or selected) responses to levels not seen in either healthy individuals or NPC patients should be considered. The boosting of these responses has been achieved by an LMP-specific peptide (30), by autologous LCLs (8, 43), and by the stimulation of PBMCs from NPC and HL patients by use of an LMP2 Ad5/F35 construct (4). Furthermore, the Ad5/F35 polyepitope was previously shown to boost LMP responses in vitro (11). The Ad-SAVINE formulation described here has the advantage over each of these methods in that it can potentially activate all CD4+ and CD8+ responses to EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2 in the absence of other competing EBV immunodominant responses. It has the further advantage that it should be applicable across all populations independent of HLA type and avoids any potential oncogenic sequences within LMPs.

The first set of experiments was designed to show that the Ad-SAVINE formulation was capable of activating LMP responses in healthy individuals as well as NPC patients. The phenotypes of the activated cultures were variable between different healthy individuals and patients, ranging from those in which the CD4 response was dominant (4/6 healthy donors and 6/7 NPC patients for which the phenotype was available) to others in which CD8+ cells were dominant (2/6 healthy donors and 1/7 NPC patients for which the phenotype was available). Since few CD4 EBV-specific epitopes have been defined, it is not possible to speculate on the EBV-specific component included in these CD4-dominant cultures. However, since SAVINE has the potential to activate all CD4 responses, presumably some of these CD4+ cells are indeed EBV specific. It should be pointed out as well that in the one case investigated, an EBNA1 response (HPV in donor 2) was detected in Ad-SAVINE-activated cultures (Table (Table2).2). However, since there are relatively few defined CD8 epitopes within this protein, it might be premature to speculate on its significance.

In terms of the EBV specificity of activated cultures, the results of a representative experiment indicate that the degree of activation (ELISPOT and 51Cr release assays) was consistently higher in the case of the Ad-SAVINE construct than in the case of autologous LCLs. In the case of healthy HLA A2 individuals, multiple LMP specificities were activated. This activation of a broad response is likely to be important for immunotherapy for NPC since the degree of LMP1 and LMP2 expression tends to be variable between patients, and a system that focuses on a broad response is more likely to be effective than one focusing on a single response.

One of the advantages of the Ad-SAVINE construct is that it can potentially be used to treat patients from diverse ethnic backgrounds without any knowledge of HLA type since all of the immune determinants from the three EBV proteins are included. The next set of experiments was designed to screen Ad-SAVINE-activated cultures with an overlapping LMP2 peptide set (15-mer peptides overlapping by 10 amino acids) to determine whether new responses could be activated. In the single NPC patient investigated, maximal activity was detected in two pools (Fig. (Fig.4B),4B), and the activity was subsequently defined as a B55-restricted LMP2 epitope, APYLFWLAA. This sequence was confirmed by 51Cr release assay, ELISPOT assay, and ICS staining and conforms to the previously reported HLA B55 binding motif ( Although other minor reactivities were seen, their significance was not investigated. In either case, this experiment is important in that it demonstrates that it might be possible to activate responses independent of a knowledge of the HLA type and in the absence of previously defined LMP epitopes and can be used as a method of identifying new epitope sequences (CD4+ or CD8+). It is interesting that this HLA allele is present at a high frequency in Asian populations, particularly in Taiwan and China (33). Specific CTLs activated with this novel peptide were functionally active in IFN-γ production and cell target lysis assays, as shown in Fig. Fig.77.

To determine the significance of the CD4+ T-cell expansions following Ad-SAVINE stimulation, an autologous outgrowth assay was performed by using unfractionated or CD4+- or CD8+-depleted cultures. The results displayed in Table Table33 indicate that the unfractionated PBMCs activated with the Ad-SAVINE construct were capable of limiting the growth of autologous LCLs but not HLA-unrelated allogeneic LCLs (data not shown) and that most of this activity could be attributed to the CD4+ component of this population. This result highlights the advantage of the Ad-SAVINE approach over the polyepitope approach, since to date, relatively few CD4 CTL epitopes for possible inclusion in a polyepitope have been defined. Although the CD4 response is dominant in activated cultures from both most healthy individuals and NPC patients, we have not investigated the relative importance of the CD4+ cells in cultures where CD8+ is the dominant phenotype using this inhibition-of-growth assay. Ongoing experiments will help clarify the role of CD4+ cells in cultures stimulated with Ad-SAVINE.

The results displayed in Table Table44 indicate that when cultures were expanded and stimulated with another recombinant adenovirus (Ad-CMVpoly), a minimal inhibition of outgrowth was seen on autologous LCLs, while a strong inhibition was seen with Ad-SAVINE-activated cultures. It should be pointed out that when the activities of these cultures were tested in a 51Cr release assay, only the Ad-SAVINE-activated cultures could recognize and kill EBV peptide-coated PHA blasts (Fig. (Fig.8).8). All of these experiments indicate that the effect seen is specific for EBV and it is not associated with an adenovirus-directed response. Furthermore, a previous report using the same replication-deficient adenovirus in which CMV had been encoded demonstrated that adenovirus did not inhibit the ability of this construct to activate a CMV-specific response (28).

A vaccine with the Ad-SAVINE formulation would appear to have distinct advantages over other current modalities under development. Thus, for instance, the adoptive transfer of LMP-specific T cells is limited by the requirement for specialized facilities and the time required for activating autologous CTLs. Direct vaccination with the adenovirus polyepitope overcomes some of these problems but is limited to those individuals for whom epitopes have been defined and incorporated into this construct. On the other hand, the Ad-SAVINE formulation would appear to have the capacity of universal utility. In the current study, SAVINE was incorporated into a replication-deficient adenovirus. In the future, it will be necessary to compare this vector with others including poxviruses.


We thank the healthy individuals and NPC patients who contributed blood for this study.

This work was supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.


[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 21 October 2009.


1. Anagnostopoulos, I., and M. Hummel. 1996. Epstein-Barr virus in tumours. Histopathology 29:297-315. [PubMed]
2. Bharadwaj, M., P. G. Parsons, and D. J. Moss. 2001. Cost-efficient quantification of enzyme-linked immunospot. Biotechniques 30:36-38. [PubMed]
3. Bollard, C. M., L. Aguilar, K. C. Straathof, B. Gahn, M. H. Huls, A. Rousseau, J. Sixbey, M. V. Gresik, G. Carrum, M. Hudson, D. Dilloo, A. Gee, M. K. Brenner, C. M. Rooney, and H. E. Heslop. 2004. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte therapy for Epstein-Barr virus+ Hodgkin's disease. J. Exp. Med. 200:1623-1633. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Bollard, C. M., S. Gottschalk, A. M. Leen, H. Weiss, K. C. Straathof, G. Carrum, M. Khalil, M. F. Wu, M. H. Huls, C. C. Chang, M. V. Gresik, A. P. Gee, M. K. Brenner, C. M. Rooney, and H. E. Heslop. 2007. Complete responses of relapsed lymphoma following genetic modification of tumor-antigen presenting cells and T-lymphocyte transfer. Blood. 110:2838-2845. [PubMed]
5. Bollard, C. M., K. C. Straathof, M. H. Huls, A. Leen, K. Lacuesta, A. Davis, S. Gottschalk, M. K. Brenner, H. E. Heslop, and C. M. Rooney. 2004. The generation and characterization of LMP2-specific CTLs for use as adoptive transfer from patients with relapsed EBV-positive Hodgkin disease. J. Immunother. 27:317-327. [PubMed]
6. Cano, P., and B. Fan. 2001. A geometric and algebraic view of MHC-peptide complexes and their binding properties. BMC Struct. Biol. 1:2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Chua, D., J. Huang, B. Zheng, S. Y. Lau, W. Luk, D. L. Kwong, J. S. Sham, D. Moss, K. Y. Yuen, S. W. Im, and M. H. Ng. 2001. Adoptive transfer of autologous Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T cells for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 94:73-80. [PubMed]
8. Comoli, P., R. De Palma, S. Siena, A. Nocera, S. Basso, F. Del Galdo, R. Schiavo, O. Carminati, A. Tagliamacco, G. F. Abbate, F. Locatelli, R. Maccario, and P. Pedrazzoli. 2004. Adoptive transfer of allogeneic Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific cytotoxic T cells with in vitro antitumor activity boosts LMP2-specific immune response in a patient with EBV-related nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 15:113-117. [PubMed]
9. Comoli, P., M. Labirio, S. Basso, F. Baldanti, P. Grossi, M. Furione, M. Vigano, R. Fiocchi, G. Rossi, F. Ginevri, B. Gridelli, A. Moretta, D. Montagna, F. Locatelli, G. Gerna, and R. Maccario. 2002. Infusion of autologous Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific cytotoxic T cells for prevention of EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorder in solid organ transplant recipients with evidence of active virus replication. Blood 99:2592-2598. [PubMed]
10. Comoli, P., P. Pedrazzoli, R. Maccario, S. Basso, O. Carminati, M. Labirio, R. Schiavo, S. Secondino, C. Frasson, C. Perotti, M. Moroni, F. Locatelli, and S. Siena. 2005. Cell therapy of stage IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma with autologous Epstein-Barr virus-targeted cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Clin. Oncol. 23:8942-8949. [PubMed]
11. Duraiswamy, J., M. Bharadwaj, J. Tellam, G. Connolly, L. Cooper, D. Moss, S. Thomson, P. Yotnda, and R. Khanna. 2004. Induction of therapeutic T-cell responses to subdominant tumor-associated viral oncogene after immunization with replication-incompetent polyepitope adenovirus vaccine. Cancer Res. 64:1483-1489. [PubMed]
12. Duraiswamy, J., J. M. Burrows, M. Bharadwaj, S. R. Burrows, L. Cooper, N. Pimtanothai, and R. Khanna. 2003. Ex vivo analysis of T-cell responses to Epstein-Barr virus-encoded oncogene latent membrane protein 1 reveals highly conserved epitope sequences in virus isolates from diverse geographic regions. J. Virol. 77:7401-7410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Duraiswamy, J., M. Sherritt, S. Thomson, J. Tellam, L. Cooper, G. Connolly, M. Bharadwaj, and R. Khanna. 2003. Therapeutic LMP1 polyepitope vaccine for EBV-associated Hodgkin disease and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Blood 101:3150-3156. [PubMed]
14. Feng, B. J., W. Huang, Y. Y. Shugart, M. K. Lee, F. Zhang, J. C. Xia, H. Y. Wang, T. B. Huang, S. W. Jian, P. Huang, Q. S. Feng, L. X. Huang, X. J. Yu, D. Li, L. Z. Chen, W. H. Jia, Y. Fang, H. M. Huang, J. L. Zhu, X. M. Liu, Y. Zhao, W. Q. Liu, M. Q. Deng, W. H. Hu, S. X. Wu, H. Y. Mo, M. F. Hong, M. C. King, Z. Chen, and Y. X. Zeng. 2002. Genome-wide scan for familial nasopharyngeal carcinoma reveals evidence of linkage to chromosome 4. Nat. Genet. 31:395-399. [PubMed]
15. Herr, W., E. Ranieri, A. Gambotto, L. S. Kierstead, A. A. Amoscato, L. Gesualdo, and W. J. Storkus. 1999. Identification of naturally processed and HLA-presented Epstein-Barr virus peptides recognized by CD4(+) or CD8(+) T lymphocytes from human blood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:12033-12038. [PubMed]
16. Josting, A., J. Wolf, and V. Diehl. 2000. Hodgkin disease: prognostic factors and treatment strategies. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 12:403-411. [PubMed]
17. Kern, F., N. Faulhaber, C. Frommel, E. Khatamzas, S. Prosch, C. Schonemann, I. Kretzschmar, R. Volkmer-Engert, H. D. Volk, and P. Reinke. 2000. Analysis of CD8 T cell reactivity to cytomegalovirus using protein-spanning pools of overlapping pentadecapeptides. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:1676-1682. [PubMed]
18. Khanna, R., S. Bell, M. Sherritt, A. Galbraith, S. R. Burrows, L. Rafter, B. Clarke, R. Slaughter, M. C. Falk, J. Douglass, T. Williams, S. L. Elliott, and D. J. Moss. 1999. Activation and adoptive transfer of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T cells in solid organ transplant patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:10391-10396. [PubMed]
19. Khanna, R., and S. R. Burrows. 2000. Role of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54:19-48. [PubMed]
20. Khanna, R., S. R. Burrows, M. G. Kurilla, C. A. Jacob, I. S. Misko, T. B. Sculley, E. Kieff, and D. J. Moss. 1992. Localization of Epstein-Barr virus cytotoxic T cell epitopes using recombinant vaccinia: implications for vaccine development. J. Exp. Med. 176:169-176. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Khanna, R., S. R. Burrows, D. J. Moss, and S. L. Silins. 1996. Peptide transporter (TAP-1 and TAP-2)-independent endogenous processing of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane protein 2A: implications for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte control of EBV-associated malignancies. J. Virol. 70:5357-5362. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Khanna, R., S. R. Burrows, J. Nicholls, and L. M. Poulsen. 1998. Identification of cytotoxic T cell epitopes within Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) oncogene latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1): evidence for HLA A2 supertype-restricted immune recognition of EBV-infected cells by LMP1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:451-458. [PubMed]
23. Khanna, R., P. Busson, S. R. Burrows, C. Raffoux, D. J. Moss, J. M. Nicholls, and L. Cooper. 1998. Molecular characterization of antigen-processing function in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC): evidence for efficient presentation of Epstein-Barr virus cytotoxic T-cell epitopes by NPC cells. Cancer Res. 58:310-314. [PubMed]
24. Lautscham, G., T. Haigh, S. Mayrhofer, G. Taylor, D. Croom-Carter, A. Leese, S. Gadola, V. Cerundolo, A. Rickinson, and N. Blake. 2003. Identification of a TAP-independent, immunoproteasome-dependent CD8+ T-cell epitope in Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2. J. Virol. 77:2757-2761. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Lee, S. P., A. T. Chan, S. T. Cheung, W. A. Thomas, D. Croom-Carter, C. W. Dawson, C. H. Tsai, S. F. Leung, P. J. Johnson, and D. P. Huang. 2000. CTL control of EBV in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC): EBV-specific CTL responses in the blood and tumors of NPC patients and the antigen-processing function of the tumor cells. J. Immunol. 165:573-582. [PubMed]
26. Lee, S. P., W. A. Thomas, R. J. Murray, F. Khanim, S. Kaur, L. S. Young, M. Rowe, M. Kurilla, and A. B. Rickinson. 1993. HLA A2.1-restricted cytotoxic T cells recognizing a range of Epstein-Barr virus isolates through a defined epitope in latent membrane protein LMP2. J. Virol. 67:7428-7435. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Lee, S. P., R. J. Tierney, W. A. Thomas, J. M. Brooks, and A. B. Rickinson. 1997. Conserved CTL epitopes within EBV latent membrane protein 2: a potential target for CTL-based tumor therapy. J. Immunol. 158:3325-3334. [PubMed]
28. Leen, A. M., G. D. Myers, U. Sili, M. H. Huls, H. Weiss, K. S. Leung, G. Carrum, R. A. Krance, C. C. Chang, J. J. Molldrem, A. P. Gee, M. K. Brenner, H. E. Heslop, C. M. Rooney, and C. M. Bollard. 2006. Monoculture-derived T lymphocytes specific for multiple viruses expand and produce clinically relevant effects in immunocompromised individuals. Nat. Med. 12:1160-1166. [PubMed]
29. Levitskaya, J., M. Coram, V. Levitsky, S. Imreh, P. M. Steigerwald-Mullen, G. Klein, M. G. Kurilla, and M. G. Masucci. 1995. Inhibition of antigen processing by the internal repeat region of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen-1. Nature 375:685-688. [PubMed]
30. Lin, C. L., W. F. Lo, T. H. Lee, Y. Ren, S. L. Hwang, Y. F. Cheng, C. L. Chen, Y. S. Chang, S. P. Lee, A. B. Rickinson, and P. K. Tam. 2002. Immunization with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) peptide-pulsed dendritic cells induces functional CD8+ T-cell immunity and may lead to tumor regression in patients with EBV-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 62:6952-6958. [PubMed]
31. Meij, P., A. Leen, A. B. Rickinson, S. Verkoeijen, M. B. Vervoort, E. Bloemena, and J. M. Middeldorp. 2002. Identification and prevalence of CD8(+) T-cell responses directed against Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein 1 and latent membrane protein 2. Int. J. Cancer 99:93-99. [PubMed]
32. Meij, P., M. B. Vervoort, J. Aarbiou, P. van Dissel, A. Brink, E. Bloemena, C. J. Meijer, and J. M. Middeldorp. 1999. Restricted low-level human antibody responses against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded latent membrane protein 1 in a subgroup of patients with EBV-associated diseases. J. Infect. Dis. 179:1108-1115. [PubMed]
33. Middleton, D., L. Menchaca, H. Rood, and R. Komerofsky. 2003. New allele frequency database: Tissue Antigens 61:403-407. [PubMed]
34. Mizuguchi, H., and M. A. Kay. 1999. A simple method for constructing E1- and E1/E4-deleted recombinant adenoviral vectors. Hum. Gene Ther. 10:2013-2017. [PubMed]
35. Moss, D. J., A. B. Rickinson, and J. H. Pope. 1979. Long-term T-cell-mediated immunity to Epstein-Barr virus in man. III. Activation of cytotoxic T cells in virus-infected leukocyte cultures. Int. J. Cancer 23:618-625. [PubMed]
36. Murray, R. J., M. G. Kurilla, J. M. Brooks, W. A. Thomas, M. Rowe, E. Kieff, and A. B. Rickinson. 1992. Identification of target antigens for the human cytotoxic T cell response to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV): implications for the immune control of EBV-positive malignancies. J. Exp. Med. 176:157-168. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Oudejans, J. J., H. Harijadi, J. A. Kummer, I. B. Tan, E. Bloemena, J. M. Middeldorp, B. Bladergroen, D. F. Dukers, W. Vos, and C. J. Meijer. 2002. High numbers of granzyme B/CD8-positive tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma biopsies predict rapid fatal outcome in patients treated with curative intent. J. Pathol. 198:468-475. [PubMed]
38. Rickinson, A. B., D. J. Moss, D. J. Allen, L. E. Wallace, M. Rowe, and M. A. Epstein. 1981. Reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T cells by in vitro stimulation with the autologous lymphoblastoid cell line. Int. J. Cancer 27:593-601. [PubMed]
39. Rooney, C. M., C. A. Smith, C. Y. Ng, S. Loftin, C. Li, R. A. Krance, M. K. Brenner, and H. E. Heslop. 1995. Use of gene-modified virus-specific T lymphocytes to control Epstein-Barr-virus-related lymphoproliferation. Lancet 345:9-13. [PubMed]
40. Rooney, C. M., C. A. Smith, C. Y. Ng, S. K. Loftin, J. W. Sixbey, Y. Gan, D. K. Srivastava, L. C. Bowman, R. A. Krance, M. K. Brenner, and H. E. Heslop. 1998. Infusion of cytotoxic T cells for the prevention and treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-induced lymphoma in allogeneic transplant recipients. Blood 92:1549-1555. [PubMed]
41. Roskrow, M. A., N. Suzuki, Y. Gan, J. W. Sixbey, C. Y. Ng, S. Kimbrough, M. Hudson, M. K. Brenner, H. E. Heslop, and C. M. Rooney. 1998. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes for the treatment of patients with EBV-positive relapsed Hodgkin's disease. Blood 91:2925-2934. [PubMed]
42. Rowe, M., R. Khanna, C. A. Jacob, V. Argaet, A. Kelly, S. Powis, M. Belich, D. Croom-Carter, S. Lee, S. R. Burrows, et al. 1995. Restoration of endogenous antigen processing in Burkitt's lymphoma cells by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1: coordinate up-regulation of peptide transporters and HLA-class I antigen expression. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:1374-1384. [PubMed]
43. Straathof, K. C., C. M. Bollard, U. Popat, M. H. Huls, T. Lopez, M. C. Morriss, M. V. Gresik, A. P. Gee, H. V. Russell, M. K. Brenner, C. M. Rooney, and H. E. Heslop. 2005. Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with Epstein-Barr virus-specific T lymphocytes. Blood 105:1898-1904. [PubMed]
44. Straathof, K. C., A. M. Leen, E. L. Buza, G. Taylor, M. H. Huls, H. E. Heslop, C. M. Rooney, and C. M. Bollard. 2005. Characterization of latent membrane protein 2 specificity in CTL lines from patients with EBV-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma. J. Immunol. 175:4137-4147. [PubMed]
45. Taylor, G. S., T. A. Haigh, N. H. Gudgeon, R. J. Phelps, S. P. Lee, N. M. Steven, and A. B. Rickinson. 2004. Dual stimulation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific CD4+- and CD8+-T-cell responses by a chimeric antigen construct: potential therapeutic vaccine for EBV-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J. Virol. 78:768-778. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Tellam, J., M. H. Fogg, M. Rist, G. Connolly, D. Tscharke, N. Webb, L. Heslop, F. Wang, and R. Khanna. 2007. Influence of translation efficiency of homologous viral proteins on the endogenous presentation of CD8+ T cell epitopes. J. Exp. Med. 204:525-532. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Thomson, S. A., A. B. Jaramillo, M. Shoobridge, K. J. Dunstan, B. Everett, C. Ranasinghe, S. J. Kent, K. Gao, J. Medveckzy, R. A. Ffrench, and I. A. Ramshaw. 2005. Development of a synthetic consensus sequence scrambled antigen HIV-1 vaccine designed for global use. Vaccine 23:4647-4657. [PubMed]
48. Yao, Y., H. A. Minter, X. Chen, G. M. Reynolds, M. Bromley, and J. R. Arrand. 2000. Heterogeneity of HLA and EBER expression in Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 88:949-955. [PubMed]
49. Yu, M. C., D. H. Garabrant, T. B. Huang, and B. E. Henderson. 1990. Occupational and other non-dietary risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Guangzhou, China. Int. J. Cancer 45:1033-1039. [PubMed]
50. Zhong, J., M. Rist, L. Cooper, C. Smith, and R. Khanna. 2008. Induction of pluripotent protective immunity following immunisation with a chimeric vaccine against human cytomegalovirus. PLoS One 3:e3256. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)