Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Immunol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 January 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2797565

Trafficking, persistence, and activation state of adoptively transferred allogeneic and autologous SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell clones during acute and chronic SIV infection of rhesus macaques1


Despite multiple lines of evidence suggesting their involvement, the precise role of CD8+ T-cells in controlling HIV replication remains unclear. To determine whether CD8+ T cells can limit retroviral replication in the absence of other immune responses, we transferred 1-13 × 109 allogeneic in vitro expanded SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell clones matched for the relevant restricting MHC-I allele into rhesus macaques near the time of intravenous (i.v.) SIV challenge. Additionally, in vitro expanded autologous SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell clones were infused 4-9 months post-infection. Infused cells did not appreciably impact acute or chronic viral replication. The partially MHC-matched allogeneic cells were not detected in the blood or most tissues after 3 days but persisted longer in the lungs as assessed by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Autologous cells transferred i.v. or intraperitoneally (i.p.) were found in BAL and blood samples for up to 8 weeks post-infusion. Interestingly, despite having a nominally activated phenotype (CD69+HLA-DR+), many of these cells persisted in the BAL without dividing. This suggests that expression of such markers by T cells at mucosal sites may not reflect recent activation, but may instead identify stable resident memory T cells. The lack of impact following transfer of such a large number of functional antigen-specific CD8+ T cells on SIV replication may reflect the magnitude of the immune response required to contain the virus.


Several lines of evidence suggest that CD8+ T cells are important for limiting AIDS virus replication: certain MHC class I alleles are highly correlated with virus control in both macaques and humans (1, 2); the onset and maintenance of HIV-specific CD8+ T-cell responses is associated with reduced viremia (3-5); plasma viremia increases dramatically upon experimental CD8 depletion in the rhesus macaque SIV model (6-8) (although CD8-expressing cell subsets (e.g. NK cells) may be affected by depletion regimens); and the emergence of CD8+ T-cell escape mutant viruses in both SIV-infected macaques and HIV-infected humans implies that CD8+ T cells apply selective pressure in vivo (9-12). Given the serious obstacles to develop an HIV vaccine capable of inducing broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibody responses (13), it is important to define the nature and limits of control of viral replication achievable by cellular immune responses, especially CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes, to guide vaccine design and development efforts.

Adoptive transfer of syngeneic antigen-specific effector T cells in mouse models of disease has been instrumental in demonstrating the importance of CD8+ T cells in tumor suppression and protection against viral infections such as cytomegalovirus and Friend virus (14-16). In part guided by such studies, treatment of human cancers with ex vivo expanded autologous CD8+ T cells specific for tumor antigens have been pursued, with some instances of apparent success (17, 18). However, attempted treatment of HIV infection with similarly expanded autologous HIV-specific CD8+ T cells failed to reduce plasma viremia; the only perceptible effect was a decline in HIV RNA+ CD4+ T cells (19). A major limitation to the long-term success of these human adoptive transfer studies is the poor persistence often observed for in vitro expanded CD8+ T-cell clones (20, 21). Thus, efforts have turned to the macaque animal model where in vivo trafficking, persistence and function are more readily studied. For example, recent results with transfer of autologous CMV-specific CD8+ T cells in Macaca nemestrina suggested that the memory phenotype of the clone from which effector CD8+ T cells are derived may help determine persistence in vivo (22). Such studies highlight the power and potential of nonhuman primate models for examining the role of CD8+ T cells in controlling AIDS viruses.

To test the hypothesis that a pre-existing SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell response can curb viral replication, we adoptively transferred allogeneic Mamu A*01- and Mamu B*17-restricted SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell clones into rhesus macaques expressing the corresponding Mamu allele(s) before or early in SIVmac251 infection. Because the recipients and donor were only MHC class I matched at one or two alleles, we refer to these transfers as hemiallogeneic. Employing advances in methods for in vitro expansion of macaque T-cell clones (22), CD8+ T cells were grown to large numbers and maintained cytolytic activity. In addition, endogenous virus-specific CD8+ T cells isolated from infected monkeys were in vitro expanded for subsequent autologous transfer during chronic infection. We show that intravenously infused autologous effector CD8+ T cells traffic to the lungs, where they persist for at least two months, but do not necessarily proliferate despite the presence of SIV-infected CD4+ T cells (as a potential source of antigen specific stimulation) and displaying an activated phenotype. These BAL-localized cells showed a nominally activated CD69+HLA-DR+ phenotype, suggesting that this surface phenotype may identify nondividing or even resting cells that have been retained in mucosal sites such as the lungs. While the hemiallogeneic cells also accumulated in the lungs, they generally did not persist beyond one week. Finally, we found that infusing cells via an intraperitoneal route dramatically altered resulting tissue distribution such that fewer cells initially populated both the blood and lungs but were maintained at higher levels over time.

Materials and Methods

Animals and generation of SIV-specific CD8+ and autologous CD4+ T-cell clones

SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell clones were generated from PBMC from an SIVmac239 chronically infected Indian Rhesus macaque, Macaca mulatta (Mamu A*01+/B*17+) as described previously (23). An infected animal was used as the donor because of the large number of antigen-specific cells available for deriving clones. The cells were adoptively transferred either 1 day pre- or 3 days post-infection to four monkeys (501, 506, 228 and 356), matched for Mamu A*01 and in one case Mamu B*17, but unmatched for other Mamu alleles, thus termed hemiallogeneic. Virus-specific CD8+ T-cell clones were also generated from PBMC collected from the four recipient monkeys (501, 506, 228 and 356) during chronic infection. The PBMC from two of these monkeys (228 and 356) was pre-sorted into CD8+ central and effector memory cells based on CD28, CD95 and CCR7 expression (central memory T cells, TCM: CD28+CD95+CCR7+; effector memory T cells, TEM: CD28CD95+CCR7). PBMC-derived CD8+ T cells (whole, TCM or TEM fractions) were stimulated for 1 week with irradiated autologous PBMC pulsed with SIV Gag or accessory (Nef, Tat and Vif) peptide pools (overlapping 15-mer peptides spanning the amino acid sequences; 1 μg/mL: NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Germantown, MD) and restimulated bi-weekly with peptide-pulsed and irradiated autologous PBMC in the presence of recombinant human IL-2 (50 IU/mL: NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program). The virus-specific CD8+ T cells were cloned by limiting dilution and maintained as described by Minang et al., (submitted for publication), based on the protocol developed Riddell et al. and Berger et al. (24, 25). Antigen-specific clones were identified by flow cytometric detection of intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) for IFN-γ. Autologous CD4+ T-cell clones (not SIV specific) were generated from PBMC from all five monkeys as described (23). Animal care followed the guidelines of the Committee on the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council, and the Health and Human Services guidelines “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (National Research Council, 1996, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.), under an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved protocol.

Cell sorting and flow cytometry

To generate SIV-specific T cells, rhesus PBMC were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs, from BD Biosciences, unless otherwise indicated) to CD4 (clone L200), CD8 (clone SK1), CD14 (clone M phi P9) and CD20 (clone 2H7). In addition to staining with the mAbs above, CD8+ T-cell fractions obtained from 228 and 356 during chronic infection were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated mAbs to CD28 (clone CD28.2; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), CCR7 (clone 150503; R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) and CD95 (clone DX2) and then sorted into TCM and TEM populations by flow cytometry using a BD FACS Aria (BD Biosciences), followed by SIV peptide stimulation and cloning. TEM clones were further sorted for expression of the CD107a after SIV peptide stimulation using CD107a mAb (clone H4A3).

Cell sorting of CD4+ T cell memory subsets from the infected recipient animals for cell-associated viral load measurements was performed using CD28 (as above) and CD95 (clone DX2, BD Pharmingen) to collect naïve (CD28+CD95), central memory (CD28+, CD95+), and effector memory (CD28, CD95+) cell fractions.

454 MHC class I sequencing

Comprehensive typing of MHC class I alleles expressed by the donor and recipient (501, 506, 228 and 356) macaques was performed as described (26). Briefly, we synthesized cDNA-PCR amplicons containing the highly polymorphic sequences of exon 2 from cellular RNA isolated from PBMC, lymph node cells or CD8+ T-cell clones from these monkeys. Each PCR primer pair contained a distinct 10 bp MID tag, which allowed the resulting sequences to be associated with the animal from which they originated, along with an adaptor sequence for emulsion PCR. Following purification, primary amplicons were normalized to equimolar concentrations and pooled for GS FLX analysis. After emulsion PCR and pyrosequencing were performed with a Genome Sequencer FLX instrument (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), high quality sequence reads were binned by their respective MID tags and assembled into contiguous sequences for each animal using SeqMan Pro (DNASTAR, Madison, WI). BLAST analysis was then performed for the resulting contiguous sequences against a custom in-house database of macaque MHC class I sequences.

Epitope mapping

To define the epitope specificity of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell clones, the cells were stimulated with pools of 15-mer overlapping peptides spanning SIV Gag and accessory protein sequences in a peptide matrix IFN-γ ELISpot as described (27). Assays were repeated with each individual 15-mer or derivative 9-mer, for SIV Gag CM9 and Nef IW9 or 8-mer, for Tat SL8 peptide (all from SynPep Corp., Dublin, CA). Antigen-specificity and Mamu-restriction was confirmed by staining with a Gag CM9 (Beckman Coulter), Nef IW9 or Tat SL8 (NIH Tetramer Facility) peptide MHC class I/tetramer.

In vitro functional and phenotypic characterization of CD8+ T-cell clones

Functional activity of the virus-specific CD8+ T-cell clones was assessed in vitro by measuring intracellular IFN-γ and surface CD107a following stimulation with autologous PBMC pulsed with SIV Gag CM9, Nef IW9, Tat SL8 peptides or the relevant peptide pools and SIVmac239- infected autologous CD4+ T cells as described by Minang et al., (submitted for publication). The lytic capacity of the donor CD8+ T-cell clones was also assessed in a 51Cr release assay using peptide-pulsed as well as virus-infected target cells as described previously (23). Briefly, target cells were labeled with 100 Ci sodium chromate (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA) and incubated for 4 h with the virus-specific CD8+ T-cell clones, in triplicate, at various effector-target ratios. Supernatants were transferred into LumaPlates (Packard BioScience, Boston, MA) and radioactivity released was measured using a 1450 Microbeta luminescence/scintillation counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA). Specific lysis was determined by using the formula: % lysis = 100 × [(mean experimental cpm - mean spontaneous cpm)/(mean maximum cpm(chk) - mean spontaneous cpm)]. Spontaneous lysis never exceeded 15% of the maximum release value. The maximum release value was determined from target cells treated with 5% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).

Surface staining for chemokine receptors, homing markers, and PD-1 was performed on clones using the following antibodies: CCR5 (clone 3A9), CCR7 (clone 150503), CCR8 (clone 191704, R&D Systems), CCR9 (clone 112509.111, R&D Systems), CD103 (clone 2G5), α4β7 (clone ACT1), PD-1 (R&D Systems, catalog number BAF1086), CD3 (clone SP34), CD8 (clone RPA-T8), and CD45 (clone HI30; not cross-reactive with rhesus macaque and thus used to exclude human feeder cells). All chemokine receptor staining was performed at 37°C.

Virus stocks and infection of CD4+ T cells

CD4+ T cells used as APC were infected with virus produced by transfection of HEK293T cells with SIVmac239 plasmid using TransIt®-293 reagent (Mirus Corporation, Madison, WI) as described (28). CD4+ T cells were infected as described (Minang et al., submitted for publication), using the ViroMag Magnetofection™ reagents (OzBiosciences, Marseille, France).

Rhesus macaque infections

All animals were challenged with pathogenic SIVmac251 via the saphenous vein with 100 AID50. This virus stock was provided by Dr. Norman Letvin of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Two of the recipient monkeys (501 and 506) were infected one day after T cell adoptive transfer and the other two (228 and 536) were infected 3 days prior to T cell infusion to allow time for virus to establish infection before CD8+ T cell infusion.

CD8+ T cell expansion in vitro, adoptive transfer and monitoring of persistence in vivo

SIV Gag CM9- and Tat SL8-specific CD8+ T-cell clones were selected for expansion and adoptive transfer to all four recipient monkeys during acute infection from the donor monkey based on in vitro functional responses (IFN-γ+CD107a+) to autologous peptide-pulsed (2.5 μg/mL) PBMC and virus-infected CD4+ T cells as well as lytic capacity in the 51Cr release assay. An SIV Nef IW9 clone was also selected for adoptive transfer to the Mamu B*17 positive monkey, 501. SIV Gag CM9, Nef IW9 (in the case of 501) and Tat SL8 (for 228 and 356 only) specific CD8+ T-cell clones generated from the recipient monkeys after acute infection, were selected for autologous infusion during chronic infection using similar criteria. The selected CD8+ T-cell clones were expanded in vitro for 6-8 weeks through repeated cycles of bi-weekly stimulation with anti-CD3 mAb (BD Biosciences) and irradiated human PBMC and human TM B-LCL as feeder cells, but without anti-CD28 mAb stimulation, to obtain billions of cells of each clone as described (23, 29). Prior to infusion, CD8+ T cell preparations were stained with a fluorescent cell membrane dye to track tissue distribution and in vivo persistence. PKH26 (red dye; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and CFSE (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were used to distinguish intraperitoneal (i.p) and intravenous (i.v) allogeneic infusions. For the autologous infusions during chronic infection the TEM- and TCM-derived cells were labeled with PKH26 and CFSE, respectively. PKH26 and CFSE have been shown to segregate evenly during cell division (30, 31). Generally, only a fraction of each population was labeled to minimize manipulation of the clones.

Labeled and unlabeled cells for adoptive transfer to each animal were pooled, washed extensively, resuspended in saline solution supplemented with 2% autologous serum, and infused (1.5 mL/min in 50 mL final volume for i.v or 5 mL/min in final 10 mL volume for i.p.). Clone viability was typically > 85% at the time of infusion. To support infused T cell survival and proliferation (32), animals 228 and 356 received subcutaneous low dose (104 U/kg/day) IL-2 injections daily for 10 days following all transfers, while IL-2 was administered to 506 and 501 only once shortly after autologous transfer. Blood was collected from the monkeys before and 30 min post-infusion and at multiple points during the first week post-infusion and once a week thereafter. BAL, jejunal biopsies, and LN samples were also collected from the animals 2-4 days post infusion and BAL once every 2-4 weeks thereafter.

The frequency of dye labeled and SIV Gag CM9, Nef IW9 (for 501) and Tat SL8 MHC class I/tetramer positive CD8+ T cells and the proportion of CD4+ T cells in PBMC, BAL, jejunal and LN samples collected at the different time points pre- and post-infusion were analyzed by flow cytometry on a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) with the additional activation markers to characterize the clones: HLA-DR (clone G46-6, BD Biosciences) and CD69 (clone TP1.55.3, Beckman Coulter). The amine reactive viability dye, ViViD, was used to exclude dead cells (33).

Proviral DNA and viral RNA measurements

CD4+ T-cell-associated viral DNA was measured for naïve (CD28+CD95), central memory (CD28+CD95+), and effector memory (CD28CD95+) populations isolated by flow cytometric sorting. Cell pellets were lysed in 25 μl of 10 mM TrisHCl with 0.1 μg/mL Proteinase K (Roche, Germany) while shaking at 1400 rpm at 56°C for 60 min, followed by protease inactivation at 95°C for 20 min (shaking). qPCR was performed on 5 μl template using a Perkin-Elmer ABI 7900, as previously described (34), with SIV gag primers and probe described previously (8). Macaca mulatta albumin DNA was measured to normalize gag copies per cell using the following primers: forward, 5’-TGCATGAGAAAACGCCAGTAA-3’, and reverse, 5’- ATGGTCGCCTGTTCACCAA-3’; and probe, 5’-(FAM)AGAAAGTCACCAAATGCTGCACGGAATC(BHQ-1)-3’.

Viral RNA from plasma, BAL, LN or jejunal samples was extracted essentially as described previously (35). To quantify viral replication, a FRET probe-based real time RT-PCR (TaqMan) assay was used as described (8, 35). All RT-PCR reactions were run on ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System and ABI sequence detection software was employed to determine viral RNA copy numbers in test samples (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Sequencing SIVmac 239 regions encoding relevant CD8+ T cell epitopes

SIVmac239 genomic regions encoding Gag CM9, Nef IW9 and Tat SL8 were sequenced from viral RNA isolated from cell-free plasma as described (28). All RT-PCR reaction conditions and primer sequences are described in Minang et al., (submitted for publication), with the addition of the following IW9 epitope primer pair: 5’-GAGGCCAAAAGTTCCCCTAA-3’ and 5’-TCTTGCGGTTAGCCTTCTTC-3’. Nucleotide sequences derived from both strands of the amplicon were aligned pairwise to the GenBank SIVmac239 sequence (Accession no. M33262.1) (36). Changes in and around the region encoding the epitope resulting in either amino acid replacements or silent mutations were noted.


Functional and phenotypic properties of in vitro expanded SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell clones

To evaluate the impact of CD8+ T cells on viral replication in acute SIV infection, we isolated and expanded SIV-specific cells for infusion into rhesus macaques at the time of challenge. CD8+ T-cell lines specific for SIV Gag CM9 (Mamu-A*01-restricted), Tat SL8 (Mamu-A*01-restricted), and Nef IW9 (Mamu-B*17-restricted) were generated from a chronically SIVmac239-infected rhesus macaque as described (23). Individual clones were then isolated and expanded in vitro using biweekly anti-CD3 stimulation and tested for cytolytic activity by 51Cr release. All tested clones showed marked target cell lysis at a range of effector to target ratios (Fig. 1A and (23)). Additional effector functions were measured by flow cytometric analysis of CD107a (a degranulation marker) and intracellular IFN-γ expression following stimulation with cognate peptide-pulsed or virus-infected autologous CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1B-C). All clones mounted robust responses to cognate peptide, with 37-85% of the cells expressing CD107a, IFN-γ, or both. Thus, the in vitro expanded clones remained SIV-reactive and retained effector function after extensive expansion in vitro.

Figure 1
In vitro functional characterization of SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell clones. (A) Autologous B-LCL were pulsed with CM9, SL8, IW9, labeled with 51Cr, and mixed with antigen-specific CD8+ T cells at the indicated effector to target (E:T) ratio. (B) B-LCL cells ...

Clones were also screened for expression of homing and activation markers that might influence their efficacy in vivo. The clones were generally CCR5+, but negative for CCR9, CCR7, and CCR8, consistent with an activated effector memory phenotype (Supplemental Fig. 1A). Expression of the gut homing markers, α4β7 and CD103, as well as the activation/exhaustion marker, PD-1, varied depending on the clone: the IW9-specific clone was α4β7hiCD103+, with a small PD-1+ subset, while the CM9-specific clone did not express high levels of these markers.

Adoptive transfer and tracking of transferred cells

Two Mamu-A*01 positive macaques were intravenously (i.v.) infused with 2-8 × 109 cells from each of the CM9- and SL8-specific clones (Fig. 2A). One of the animals, 501 (Mamu-B*17) was also infused with 1 × 109 cells of an IW9-specific clone. The recipient animals were matched to the donors only for the Mamu-A*01 and Mamu-B*17 alleles (i.e. hemiallogeneic). One fourth of the infused cells for each clone were labeled with the cell-permeable dye, CFSE, to track the persistence and trafficking of the infused cells in blood and tissues over time. One day following the adoptive transfer, the macaques were infected i.v. with SIVmac251.

Figure 2
Experimental schema for SIV-specific CD8+ T cell adoptive transfer and SIV challenge in rhesus macaques. (A-B) The timing (in days) and composition of hemiallogeneic SIV-specific T-cell clones infused for each of 4 animals (identification numbers at left) ...

The antigen-specificity and CFSE fluorescence of the cell mixture was confirmed by flow cytometry prior to infusion (Fig. 3A). Tetramer staining for CM9, SL8, and IW9 indicated that these clones represented 54%, 36%, and 5%, respectively, of the total cell mixture infused into animal 501, proportions consistent with the initial relative number of cells of each clone. CFSE fluorescence within each tetramer-positive population confirmed labeling of ~25% of the cell mixture.

Figure 3
Detection and persistence of CFSE labeled hemiallogeneic SIV-specific CD8+ T cells following infusion into rhesus macaques. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of the expanded CD8+ T cell mixture prior to infusion in animal 501. 25% of each clone was labeled ...

Twenty-four hours after the transfer, infused cells were readily detected in peripheral blood, ranging from 0.4% (IW9) to 2.3% (CM9) of the CD8+ T cell compartment (Fig. 3B). The CFSE labeled fraction of each clone remained at about 25%, suggesting that the labeling did not affect initial cell survival. After 3 days, however, the transferred cells were barely detectable in the periphery, with a 5- to 50-fold reduction from day 1 (Fig. 3C, left). By contrast, over 20% of BAL T cells were CFSE-positive at this time, indicating massive localization of the clones to the lung. As only one fourth of the infused cells were labeled, the finding of 20% CFSE+ cells is consistent with up to 80% of the total T cell population in BAL comprised of infused cells. However, CFSE+ T cells were undetectable in both BAL and peripheral blood by day 9 post-infusion (data not shown), likely due to host rejection or IL-2 withdrawal death. No labeled cells were found in lymph nodes or jejunal biopsies at any point (data not shown), despite expression of the gut homing markers α4β7 and CD103 by some clones (Supplemental Fig. 1). These data suggest that the infused cells localized preferentially to the lungs. Similar results were observed in the periphery of animal 506, although fewer cells were detected overall and we did not sample BAL during acute infection. Remarkably, no adverse events were associated with the massive cell infusion, totaling over 1010 cells, in either animal.

Effect of transferred cells on acute viremia

To determine whether the hemiallogeneic CD8+ T-cell clones were able to impact SIV replication during acute infection, we measured plasma viral RNA by quantitative RT-PCR. For both animals, viremia was robust by day 5 post-infection (6 days post-infusion), ranging from 3-30 × 105 SIV RNA copies/mL, and peaked around day 9 at 5-7 × 107 copies/mL (Fig. 4). Six untreated historical control macaques that received an equivalent SIVmac251 challenge showed similar peak viral loads, suggesting that the infusion did not affect peak viremia. Although viremia appeared to develop with slightly faster kinetics in the two treated animals, overall the adoptive transfer did not have any measurable impact on viremia during the first week of infection.

Figure 4
SIV plasma viremia following hemiallogeneic transfer. Plasma viremia is plotted against days post-infection for each animal and 6 untreated controls (black symbols). Animals that received cells 1 day prior to SIV challenge are shown in blue, while those ...

Due to the short persistence of the transferred cells, we modified the protocol in a subsequent round of experiments in an effort to enhance survival and potential antiviral efficacy of the infused cells. We hypothesized that active viral replication at the time of cell transfer would provide an immediate target for the CD8+ T-cell clones, possibly fueling in vivo activation, proliferation, and persistence. Thus, two new animals (228, 356) were infected with SIVmac251 3 days prior to adoptive transfer of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell clones (Fig. 2B). In addition, half of the cells were delivered intravenously (i.v., PKH-26-labeled) and half intraperitoneally (i.p., CFSE-labeled), as the latter may provide a more direct conduit to gastrointestinal sites of SIV replication. To minimize potential cytokine withdrawal death of the clones in vivo, the animals received daily IL-2 injections subcutaneously for 10 days following the transfer, an approach used clinically. Because CD4+ T cell activation following IL-15 treatment in rhesus macaque does not elevate acute plasma viremia (37), we did not anticipate any effects of IL-2 on viral load.

As with the previous transfers, the labeled SIV-specific cells were not detectable in peripheral blood beyond 3 days (Fig. 3D, 6 days post-infection). The endogenous immune response to SIV was evident by day 10 post-infection, when significant frequencies of SL8-specific CD8+ T cells were observed in peripheral blood (Fig. 3D, black open symbols). Remarkably, some transferred cells persisted in the lungs of one of the animals (228, shown in Fig. 3D) for up to 3 weeks, albeit at low frequencies: 0.3% and 0.02% of the total SL8- and CM9-specific CD8+ T cells, respectively, in BAL. To determine whether persistence in this animal was due to a similar genetic background between the donor and recipient, we performed MHC class I sequencing (26). However, there was no evidence of greater MHC allele sharing between animal 228 and the donor than any of the other transfer pairs (data not shown). Thus, the persistence in this case cannot be attributed to a close genetic relationship based on currently available comprehensive MHC class I typing technology.

Despite the protocol modifications, SIV replication did not appear to be affected by the transferred cells. Acute plasma viral load peaked to similar levels as in the first two recipient animals as well as the control animals (Fig. 4). In addition, there was no evidence of immune selection pressure exerted by the infused clones in the two animals we sequenced (501 and 356), as no escape mutations were detected in the targeted virus-specific CD8+ T-cell epitopes until 2-4 weeks post-infection (data not shown), consistent with the kinetics of pressure exerted by the endogenous CD8+ T-cell response (38). Tetramer staining confirmed that the endogenous blood CM9- and SL8-specific responses developed with kinetics typical of macaque responses to SIV infection, peaking 3-4 weeks post-infection at 1-10% of the CD8+ T cells (39).

Autologous CD8+ T cell transfer has no impact on chronic SIV replication

Because hemiallogeneic cells are threatened by host rejection, interpreting the results from this model is complicated. To address the fundamental question of whether transferred SIV-specific CD8+ T cells can limit virus replication in vivo, we thus turned to an autologous transfer model during chronic SIV infection. SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell clones were isolated from the infected macaques that received the hemiallogeneic transfer and expanded in vitro (Fig. 2C). Anti-viral activity of the autologous CD8+ T-cells was confirmed by assessing their capacity to produce IFN-γ in response to cognate SIV peptides or SIV-infected autologous CD4+ T cells (Fig. 5A). The surface expression of homing and activation markers was similar to that observed for the hemiallogeneic transferred clones (Supplemental Fig. 1B). Most clones contained at least a subset of PD-1 cells, indicating that in vitro expansion did not necessarily result in an exhausted or proapoptotic phenotype (see also Minang et al., submitted for publication).

Figure 5
Functional activity and in vivo efficacy of expanded SIV-specific cells on chronic viremia. (A) An expanded CM9-specific CD8+ T-cell clone derived from animal 506 after infection was measured for effector function by intracellular staining (ICS) for IFN-γ ...

The expanded clones were infused into chronically infected autologous macaques 4-6 months post-challenge, again with a fraction of each clone infused i.v. and i.p. (Fig. 2C). The combination of clones (specificity, relative cell numbers, memory phenotype derivation), labeling dyes, and infusion routes varied slightly among the transfers administered to each animal due to cell availability and iterative attempts to enhance efficacy. However, plasma viremia did not decrease after any of the 5 autologous infusions (Fig. 5B). In one case (animal 501; Mamu-B*17), viremia dropped spontaneously by ~1.5 logs right before the infusion, but no further reduction occurred after the infusion. A brief 2-5-fold increase in plasma viremia was observed for most of the animals in the immediate period following the infusion, which then returned to pre-infusion levels within a week (Fig. 5B, 5C).

To further test whether the transferred cells had any effect on SIV replication through elimination of cells harboring SIV, we measured cell-associated viral DNA by real-time PCR. Peripheral blood CD4+ T cells collected at different time points post infection were sorted into naïve (CD28+CD95), central memory (CD28+CD95+), and effector memory (CD28CD95+) populations by flow cytometry. Levels of cell-associated viral DNA in the months preceding the autologous virus-specific CD8+ T cell transfer ranged from undetectable to 2.4 copies per cell in animals 506 and 501 (Fig. 5D and data not shown), with an apparent bias towards infection of central and effector memory CD4+ T cell populations, as reported previously (40, 41). However, cell-associated viral load did not significantly change following the CD8+ T-cell infusion, consistent with unaltered plasma viremia (Fig. 5B). Thus, we were unable to demonstrate any measurable impact of the transferred cells on SIV replication.

To determine whether the CD8+ T cell epitopes targeted by the clones were still present at the time of the autologous infusion, we sequenced plasma virus for two of the animals (501 and 356). The epitopes targeted by one of the two clones infused into each animal had mutated and conferred escape from CD8+ T-cell recognition (Nef IW9 and Tat TL8 for 501 and 356, respectively, data not shown). Therefore half of the targeted epitopes in at least two of the animals were no longer present at the time of infusion.

Tracking autologous SIV-specific CD8+ T cells transferred during chronic viremia

To determine the persistence of the autologous transfer and the effect of infusion route on in vivo cell trafficking, CFSE and PKH26 cell labeling was used to distinguish i.v. and i.p. delivery, respectively, in animals 506 and 501. Using animal 501 as an example, i.v. transferred CM9-specific cells were abundant in both the blood and BAL in the days following the infusion, and persisted for at least 2 months (Fig. 6A, 6B). With 26% of blood CM9-specific cells CFSE+, the transferred cells represented 52% of the blood CM9 population, as only half of the i.v. infused CM9 clone was CFSE labeled and assuming similar survival of labeled and unlabeled cells during the first 24 h. This represents about 0.3% of the total CD8+ T-cell compartment in the blood (0.8% of the CD8+ T-cell response was CM9-specific at this time, data not shown). Similarly, with 46% CFSE+ BAL CM9-specific cells 3 days post-transfer, the i.v. infused cells represent 92% of BAL CM9-specific CD8+ T cells, or 53% of the total CD8+ T-cell population in BAL (58% of CD8+ T cells in BAL were SIV Gag CM9-specific; data not shown). For the second set of animals (228 and 356), we detected fewer cells from the infusion of TCM- and TEM-derived autologous clones for unknown reasons.

Figure 6
In vivo persistence and activation status of SIV-specific CD8+ T cells following autologous transfer. (A) CD69 and HLA-DR expression is shown for CD8+ T cells in the lungs (BAL) 43 days post-infusion in animal 501. CD69 and HLA-DR expression by CM9-specific ...

CD8+ T-cell clones infused i.p. (PKH26+) were also readily detected in both the blood and BAL. However, the cells populated these compartments with different kinetics compared to the i.v. infused cells: labeled cells were not detectable in peripheral blood until the day after the infusion (compared to 30 minutes for the cells transferred via the i.v. route), and never made up more than 1% of the total CM9-specific CD8+ T-cell population in blood. However, their representation in the blood was more stable over the two months following the infusion: dropping only to 0.1% by day 56, while the i.v. derived cells declined precipitously from 26% to 0.02% during this period. Similarly, considerably fewer cells transferred via the i.p. route homed to the lungs (0.2% of the CM9-specific cells at day 3), although their representation in the BAL slightly increased over time, peaking at 1.1% of CM9-specific CD8+ T cells on day 56, while the i.v. infused cells dropped from 46% to 4.6% (Fig. 6B). Together these data indicate that tissue homing and equilibration of the transferred cells can vary considerably with the route of infusion. In addition, the lack of perceptible effect on chronic viremia was not due to poor persistence of the transferred autologous cells.

Activation status of transferred cells

Since the dye tracking data indicated that the transferred autologous CD8+ T-cell clones were persisting in vivo, we next examined activation markers. All clones were CD69+HLA-DRdim/+ at the time of infusion (data not shown). Flow cytometric analysis of BAL CD8+ T cells 5 months post-infection (43 days after the autologous infusion) indicated that CD69 is highly expressed by most cells at this site (Fig. 6A, panel a). This is presumably independent of SIV infection, as similar staining was observed two days post-challenge, a time prior to significant viral replication (data not shown). CM9-specific cells expressed slightly elevated MHC class II (HLA-DR) compared to the rest of the CD8+ T cells (panel b), likely due to stimulation by active SIV replication in the lung. The dye-labeled fraction of this population expressed similar CD69 and HLA-DR as the unlabeled fraction (panels c and d), which was also representative of the pre-infusion profile for this and other clones (data not shown). Thus the activation profile of transferred cells that localized to the lung was similar to that of both the endogenous SIV-specific response and lung-resident CD8+ T cells in general.

We also used the CFSE dye to track the proliferation of transferred clones, as fluorescence is diluted by half with each round of division. The median fluorescence intensity of the CFSE+ CM9-specific cells in the blood and BAL was plotted over time following the autologous cell adoptive transfer into animal 501 (Fig. 6C). These curves were compared to the natural decay of CFSE fluorescence observed for non-dividing murine cells, as short-lived labeled cellular proteins turn over (42). Relative to the natural decay rate reference, there was a substantial population of transferred SIV-specific cells that did not proliferate in either the lung or blood. Thus CD69 and HLA-DR expression by lung-resident T cells does not necessarily indicate actively dividing populations. Rather, these markers may identify memory T cells that preferentially home to or are retained in this site.


Adoptive transfer experiments may help elucidate the mechanism and limits of CD8+ T cell control of viral replication, which have important implications for vaccine design. In particular, it has been postulated that naïve and even vaccinated animals suffer from insufficient SIV-specific cells arriving at sites of viral replication (43). To determine whether virus-specific CD8+ T cells can control SIV replication when infused in large numbers, we adoptively transferred 107-1010 SIV-specific hemiallogeneic CD8+ T cells at or around the time of challenge in four rhesus macaques. While we did not observe any reduction in acute plasma viremia, the infused CD8+ T cells were generally undetectable in peripheral blood beyond 3 days. It is therefore difficult to conclude whether host rejection of the clones interfered with their antiviral activity or the clones were simply ineffective. To eliminate the prospect of rejection, we modified our protocol and infused autologous SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell clones to the same cohort of monkeys during chronic infection. While a markedly improved persistence was observed for the autologous cells, there was no measurable impact on the plasma viral load or CD4+ T-cell-associated SIV DNA. Although we were unable to detect any evidence of virus control by the transferred cells, tracking and phenotypic characterization of the infused cells in vivo revealed some novel immunologic phenomena: a distinct preference for residing in the lungs and continuous expression of activation markers without apparent cell division. Together, these data suggest that an activated T cell phenotype may facilitate recruitment to specific effector/mucosal sites, such as the lungs, and does not necessarily reflect recent antigen stimulation.

The lack of perceptible effect on viral replication by either the hemiallogeneic or autologous CD8+ T cell adoptive transfer may be due to the inability of SIV-specific CD8+ T cells to independently control viremia, limitations of this adoptive transfer model, or a combination of these or related factors. The short persistence of the hemiallogeneic clones suggests that the host rejected them within days of the transfer, as autologous clones expanded and infused in the same manner persisted longer in our chronic infection model and during acute infection, as shown by Minang et al. (submitted for publication). This may explain the apparent accelerated rate of acute SIV replication observed in the two animals challenged the day after the transfer, as inflammation during a host-versus-graft response might increase the pool of activated CD4+ T cells susceptible to SIV infection at the time of challenge. Rapid clearance of the hemiallogeneic cells may also explain why we did not observe selective pressure exerted on targeted viral epitopes in circulating virus, while Minang et al. (submitted for publication) observed a very early escape mutation following transfer of autologous cells that did persist.

The question remains why there was no measurable effect of the autologous transfer on viremia. It is possible that the transfer procedure or a host suppressive response impaired the activity of the clones in vivo. However, transferred cells recovered from the lungs one month following transfer in similar experiments performed during acute infection retained effector function upon ex vivo antigen-specific stimulation (Minang et al., submitted for publication). In addition, several clones expressed little or no PD-1 at the time of infusion. And although our infusions of clones originating from TCM and TEM phenotypes did not show a difference in persistence, as the study by Berger et al. (22), related studies also failed to detect any difference between TCM- and TEM-derived clones in terms of in vivo persistence or anti-viral activity (Minang et al., submitted for publication). Thus, the importance of memory phenotype in determining transferred cell fate is uncertain, and other barriers possibly limited their efficacy. Most likely, by retention in the lungs (or other tissues not sampled), the clones were sequestered from critical sites of virus replication. In addition, some (but not all) of the CD8+ T cell epitopes targeted by the autologous SIV-specific clones were found to have mutated prior to the infusion during chronic viremia, rendering those clones of limited value. It is also possible that soluble factors that suppress HIV-specific CD8+ T cell lytic activity during chronic HIV infection may impact SIV-specific cells as well (44, 45). Alternatively, inflammatory cytokines released by the effector cells may activate latently infected cells or promote new infection of recently activated CD4+ T cells, inadvertently boosting virus production. This could explain the transient spike in plasma viremia observed in the days post-infusion. Notably, autologous HIV-specific CD8+ T cell therapy in humans resulted in a similar elevation in plasma viremia (19).

Although we could not detect an impact on viremia, the in vivo trafficking of the infused clones revealed striking localization properties. When delivered i.v., autologous cells instantaneously populated peripheral blood, where they persisted for at least two months but declined steadily. These cells were highly abundant in the BAL, where they persisted to a greater extent than in the blood, dropping only 10-fold from peak representation compared to a 2000-fold reduction in the blood over 8 weeks. Distinct accumulation of the transferred cells in the lungs is consistent with entrapment of i.v. transferred effector cells as they pass through the constricting vasculature of this organ during pulmonary circulation. While similar observations have been made for adoptively transferred cells in mice (46, 47), to our knowledge this, in conjunction with similar findings by Minang et al. (submitted for publication), is the first documentation of such distribution in primates. Homing to the lungs may be due to expression of adhesion molecules, such as lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1), which mediate T cell entry into the airways (48-50). There is also evidence that the morphological rigidity or polarization of effector cells contributes to trapping within pulmonary capillaries (51, 52). Adoptive transfer of bulk, unstimulated PBMC does not result in accumulation of the transferred cells in the lungs in cynomolgus macaques (53), suggesting that this phenomenon may be dependent on the activated effector phenotype of the transferred cells. Notably, expression of α4β7 and CD103, markers commonly associated with intestinal homing, did not result in detectable localization of clones to the jejunum, as was also observed by Minang et al. (submitted for publication).

The different localization and tissue equilibration patterns observed for i.p. and i.v. infused cells suggest that i.p. transfer largely avoids a massive, early lung entrapment. Rather, the slight, gradual increase in infused cells in BAL combined with the persistent low-level maintenance in blood may reflect slow leakage of peritoneal-deposited cells into circulation, followed by entrapment in the lungs as described above. This would provide a steady supply of i.p. delivered cells to continuously populate the BAL via the blood, which has been proposed to be a site of recruitment for memory T cells to the lungs (54).

Infused cells that persisted in the lungs displayed an “activated” CD69+HLA-DRdim expression profile; remarkably, a substantial fraction of these cells did not divide in vivo for at least 6 weeks while maintaining this phenotype. Thus expression of either CD69 or HLA-DR, two markers commonly used to identify activated cells in PBMC or in ex vivo analyses, does not necessarily indicate active cell division and should not be equated with concurrent effector functions. Moreover, this phenotype was typical of the resident lung CD8+ T cell population, suggesting that the lung contains a resting or semi-resting, long-lived, stable and nondividing T lymphocyte population. Similar evidence of nondividing T cells displaying an effector phenotype in the mouse lung has given rise to the theory that tissue-specific immunoregulatory mechanisms may exist to maintain homeostasis amidst high antigen load (55-59). Indeed, this same phenotype for T cells has been seen for gut-associated CD4+ T cells (60). Thus the hypothesis that the gut is a repository for highly-activated dividing T cells that serve as an optimal reservoir of SIV and HIV replication should be re-examined. In any case, the expression of “activation” markers on cells in vivo cannot be used to definitively denote those cells as mitotically active nor even necessarily evincing effector functions.

In summary, we found no evidence of independent SIV control by infused CD8+ T cells. The capability of the transferred cells to target virus replication in vivo may have been hampered by several factors, including prompt host-versus-graft rejection for the hemiallogeneic clones infused during acute infection, homing to and confinement within peripheral tissues for many of the clones, viral epitope escape during chronic infection, or simply an insufficiency of cell number. Regardless, we demonstrated the feasibility of expanding massive numbers of antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell clones, while maintaining a memory phenotype and cytolytic activity. Moreover, infusion of over 1010 cells was well tolerated without any associated adverse events in the animals. We identified persistent transferred cells expressing activation markers that did not proliferate in vivo, suggesting that identification of effector and dividing cells by surface phenotype should be reconsidered. Our findings on T cell trafficking, proliferation, and survival following adoptive transfer will help to design future studies addressing CD8+ T-cell control of immunodeficiency virus replication in vivo.

Supplementary Material

Supp fig 1

Supp fig legend


We thank Vicky Coalter and Adam Wiles for help with sample processing; Fang Yuan and Kelli Oswald for performing the viral load (qPCR) analyses; Richard Nguyen for flow cytometric sorting of CD4+ T cell populations for cell-associated viral load analysis; and Joanne Yu for preparing fluorescent antibody conjugates. We are grateful to Dr. Norman Letvin for providing the SIVmac251 virus stock. The following reagents were obtained through the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH: IL-2 from Hoffman-La Roche Inc., NJ; IW9 and SL8 peptide/MHC tetramers from the NIH Tetramer Facility, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.


1This work was supported by the intramural research programs of the NIAID and NCI, NIH. This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under contract numbers N01-C0-12400 and HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.


The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


1. Migueles SA, Sabbaghian MS, Shupert WL, Bettinotti MP, Marincola FM, Martino L, Hallahan CW, Selig SM, Schwartz D, Sullivan J, Connors M. HLA B*5701 is highly associated with restriction of virus replication in a subgroup of HIV-infected long term nonprogressors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:2709–2714. [PubMed]
2. Mothe BR, Weinfurter J, Wang C, Rehrauer W, Wilson N, Allen TM, Allison DB, Watkins DI. Expression of the major histocompatibility complex class I molecule Mamu-A*01 is associated with control of simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239 replication. J Virol. 2003;77:2736–2740. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Koup RA, Safrit JT, Cao Y, Andrews CA, McLeod G, Borkowsky W, Farthing C, Ho DD. Temporal association of cellular immune responses with the initial control of viremia in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 syndrome. J Virol. 1994;68:4650–4655. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Cao Y, Qin L, Zhang L, Safrit J, Ho DD. Virologic and immunologic characterization of long-term survivors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:201–208. [PubMed]
5. Klein MR, van Baalen CA, Holwerda AM, Kerkhof Garde SR, Bende RJ, Keet IP, Eeftinck-Schattenkerk JK, Osterhaus AD, Schuitemaker H, Miedema F. Kinetics of Gag-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses during the clinical course of HIV-1 infection: a longitudinal analysis of rapid progressors and long-term asymptomatics. J Exp Med. 1995;181:1365–1372. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Schmitz JE, Kuroda MJ, Santra S, Sasseville VG, Simon MA, Lifton MA, Racz P, Tenner-Racz K, Dalesandro M, Scallon BJ, Ghrayeb J, Forman MA, Montefiori DC, Rieber EP, Letvin NL, Reimann KA. Control of viremia in simian immunodeficiency virus infection by CD8+ lymphocytes. Science. 1999;283:857–860. [PubMed]
7. Jin X, Bauer DE, Tuttleton SE, Lewin S, Gettie A, Blanchard J, Irwin CE, Safrit JT, Mittler J, Weinberger L, Kostrikis LG, Zhang L, Perelson AS, Ho DD. Dramatic rise in plasma viremia after CD8(+) T cell depletion in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques. J Exp Med. 1999;189:991–998. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Lifson JD, Rossio JL, Piatak M, Jr., Parks T, Li L, Kiser R, Coalter V, Fisher B, Flynn BM, Czajak S, Hirsch VM, Reimann KA, Schmitz JE, Ghrayeb J, Bischofberger N, Nowak MA, Desrosiers RC, Wodarz D. Role of CD8(+) lymphocytes in control of simian immunodeficiency virus infection and resistance to rechallenge after transient early antiretroviral treatment. J Virol. 2001;75:10187–10199. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Borrow P, Lewicki H, Wei X, Horwitz MS, Peffer N, Meyers H, Nelson JA, Gairin JE, Hahn BH, Oldstone MB, Shaw GM. Antiviral pressure exerted by HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) during primary infection demonstrated by rapid selection of CTL escape virus. Nat Med. 1997;3:205–211. [PubMed]
10. Price DA, Goulder PJ, Klenerman P, Sewell AK, Easterbrook PJ, Troop M, Bangham CR, Phillips RE. Positive selection of HIV-1 cytotoxic T lymphocyte escape variants during primary infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:1890–1895. [PubMed]
11. Evans DT, O'Connor DH, Jing P, Dzuris JL, Sidney J, da Silva J, Allen TM, Horton H, Venham JE, Rudersdorf RA, Vogel T, Pauza CD, Bontrop RE, DeMars R, Sette A, Hughes AL, Watkins DI. Virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses select for amino-acid variation in simian immunodeficiency virus Env and Nef. Nat Med. 1999;5:1270–1276. [PubMed]
12. Chen ZW, Craiu A, Shen L, Kuroda MJ, Iroku UC, Watkins DI, Voss G, Letvin NL. Simian immunodeficiency virus evades a dominant epitope-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte response through a mutation resulting in the accelerated dissociation of viral peptide and MHC class I. J Immunol. 2000;164:6474–6479. [PubMed]
13. Stamatatos L, Morris L, Burton DR, Mascola JR. Neutralizing antibodies generated during natural HIV-1 infection: good news for an HIV-1 vaccine? Nat Med. 2009 [PubMed]
14. Greenberg PD. Adoptive T cell therapy of tumors: mechanisms operative in the recognition and elimination of tumor cells. Adv Immunol. 1991;49:281–355. [PubMed]
15. Pahl-Seibert MF, Juelch M, Podlech J, Thomas D, Deegen P, Reddehase MJ, Holtappels R. Highly protective in vivo function of cytomegalovirus IE1 epitope-specific memory CD8 T cells purified by T-cell receptor-based cell sorting. J Virol. 2005;79:5400–5413. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Hasenkrug KJ, Dittmer U. Immune control and prevention of chronic Friend retrovirus infection. Front Biosci. 2007;12:1544–1551. [PubMed]
17. Bollard CM, Aguilar L, Straathof KC, Gahn B, Huls MH, Rousseau A, Sixbey J, Gresik MV, Carrum G, Hudson M, Dilloo D, Gee A, Brenner MK, Rooney CM, Heslop HE. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte therapy for Epstein-Barr virus+ Hodgkin's disease. J Exp Med. 2004;200:1623–1633. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Robbins PF, Yang JC, Hwu P, Schwartzentruber DJ, Topalian SL, Sherry R, Restifo NP, Hubicki AM, Robinson MR, Raffeld M, Duray P, Seipp CA, Rogers-Freezer L, Morton KE, Mavroukakis SA, White DE, Rosenberg SA. Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science. 2002;298:850–854. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Brodie SJ, Lewinsohn DA, Patterson BK, Jiyamapa D, Krieger J, Corey L, Greenberg PD, Riddell SR. In vivo migration and function of transferred HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T cells. Nat Med. 1999;5:34–41. [PubMed]
20. Dudley ME, Wunderlich J, Nishimura MI, Yu D, Yang JC, Topalian SL, Schwartzentruber DJ, Hwu P, Marincola FM, Sherry R, Leitman SF, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive transfer of cloned melanoma-reactive T lymphocytes for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. J Immunother. 2001;24:363–373. [PubMed]
21. Yee C, Thompson JA, Byrd D, Riddell SR, Roche P, Celis E, Greenberg PD. Adoptive T cell therapy using antigen-specific CD8+ T cell clones for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: in vivo persistence, migration, and antitumor effect of transferred T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:16168–16173. [PubMed]
22. Berger C, Jensen MC, Lansdorp PM, Gough M, Elliott C, Riddell SR. Adoptive transfer of effector CD8+ T cells derived from central memory cells establishes persistent T cell memory in primates. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:294–305. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Andersen H, Barsov EV, Trivett MT, Trubey CM, Giavedoni LD, Lifson JD, Ott DE, Ohlen C. Transduction with human telomerase reverse transcriptase immortalizes a rhesus macaque CD8+ T cell clone with maintenance of surface marker phenotype and function. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007;23:456–465. [PubMed]
24. Berger C, Huang ML, Gough M, Greenberg PD, Riddell SR, Kiem HP. Nonmyeloablative immunosuppressive regimen prolongs In vivo persistence of gene-modified autologous T cells in a nonhuman primate model. J Virol. 2001;75:799–808. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Riddell SR, Greenberg PD. The use of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies to clone and expand human antigen-specific T cells. J Immunol Methods. 1990;128:189–201. [PubMed]
26. Wiseman RW, Karl JA, Bimber B, O'Leary CE, Lank SM, Tuscher JJ, Detmer AM, Bouffard P, Levenkova N, Turcotte CL, Szekeres E, Wright C, Harkins T, O'Connor DH. MHC genotyping with massively parallel pyrosequencing. Nat Med. 2009 in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Frahm N, Korber BT, Adams CM, Szinger JJ, Draenert R, Addo MM, Feeney ME, Yusim K, Sango K, Brown NV, SenGupta D, Piechocka-Trocha A, Simonis T, Marincola FM, Wurcel AG, Stone DR, Russell CJ, Adolf P, Cohen D, Roach T, StJohn A, Khatri A, Davis K, Mullins J, Goulder PJ, Walker BD, Brander C. Consistent cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte targeting of immunodominant regions in human immunodeficiency virus across multiple ethnicities. J Virol. 2004;78:2187–2200. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Minang JT, Trivett MT, Coren LV, Barsov EV, Piatak M, Jr., Chertov O, Chertova E, Ott DE, Ohlen C. The Mamu B 17-restricted SIV Nef IW9 to TW9 mutation abrogates correct epitope processing and presentation without loss of replicative fitness. Virology. 2008;375:307–314. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Minang JT, Barsov EV, Yuan F, Trivett MT, Piatak M, Jr., Lifson JD, Ott DE, Ohlen C. Efficient inhibition of SIV replication in rhesus CD4+ T-cell clones by autologous immortalized SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell clones. Virology. 2008;372:430–441. [PubMed]
30. De Clerck LS, Bridts CH, Mertens AM, Moens MM, Stevens WJ. Use of fluorescent dyes in the determination of adherence of human leucocytes to endothelial cells and the effect of fluorochromes on cellular function. J Immunol Methods. 1994;172:115–124. [PubMed]
31. Horan PK, Slezak SE. Stable cell membrane labelling. Nature. 1989;340:167–168. [PubMed]
32. Cheever MA, Greenberg PD, Fefer A, Gillis S. Augmentation of the anti-tumor therapeutic efficacy of long-term cultured T lymphocytes by in vivo administration of purified interleukin 2. J Exp Med. 1982;155:968–980. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Lamoreaux L, Nguyen R, Ambrozak D, Koup RA, Roederer M. Amine reactive dyes: an effective tool to discriminate live and dead cells in polychromatic flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 2006;313:199–208. [PubMed]
34. Douek DC, Brenchley JM, Betts MR, Ambrozak DR, Hill BJ, Okamoto Y, Casazza JP, Kuruppu J, Kunstman K, Wolinsky S, Grossman Z, Dybul M, Oxenius A, Price DA, Connors M, Koup RA. HIV preferentially infects HIV-specific CD4+ T cells. Nature. 2002;417:95–98. [PubMed]
35. Cline AN, Bess JW, Piatak M, Jr., Lifson JD. Highly sensitive SIV plasma viral load assay: practical considerations, realistic performance expectations, and application to reverse engineering of vaccines for AIDS. J Med Primatol. 2005;34:303–312. [PubMed]
36. Kestler H, Kodama T, Ringler D, Marthas M, Pedersen N, Lackner A, Regier D, Sehgal P, Daniel M, King N, et al. Induction of AIDS in rhesus monkeys by molecularly cloned simian immunodeficiency virus. Science. 1990;248:1109–1112. [PubMed]
37. Okoye A, Park H, Rohankhedkar M, Coyne-Johnson L, Lum R, Walker JM, Planer SL, Legasse AW, Sylwester AW, Piatak M, Jr., Lifson JD, Sodora DL, Villinger F, Axthelm MK, Schmitz JE, Picker LJ. Profound CD4+/CCR5+ T cell expansion is induced by CD8+ lymphocyte depletion but does not account for accelerated SIV pathogenesis. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1575–1588. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. O'Connor DH, Allen TM, Vogel TU, Jing P, DeSouza IP, Dodds E, Dunphy EJ, Melsaether C, Mothe B, Yamamoto H, Horton H, Wilson N, Hughes AL, Watkins DI. Acute phase cytotoxic T lymphocyte escape is a hallmark of simian immunodeficiency virus infection. Nat Med. 2002;8:493–499. [PubMed]
39. Goulder PJ, Watkins DI. HIV and SIV CTL escape: implications for vaccine design. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:630–640. [PubMed]
40. Mattapallil JJ, Douek DC, Hill B, Nishimura Y, Martin M, Roederer M. Massive infection and loss of memory CD4+ T cells in multiple tissues during acute SIV infection. Nature. 2005;434:1093–1097. [PubMed]
41. Nishimura Y, Igarashi T, Donau OK, Buckler-White A, Buckler C, Lafont BA, Goeken RM, Goldstein S, Hirsch VM, Martin MA. Highly pathogenic SHIVs and SIVs target different CD4+ T cell subsets in rhesus monkeys, explaining their divergent clinical courses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12324–12329. [PubMed]
42. Lyons A, Doherty K. Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2004. Flow Cytometric Analysis of Cell Division by Dye Dilution. [PubMed]
43. Davenport MP, Ribeiro RM, Zhang L, Wilson DP, Perelson AS. Understanding the mechanisms and limitations of immune control of HIV. Immunol Rev. 2007;216:164–175. [PubMed]
44. Joly P, Guillon JM, Mayaud C, Plata F, Theodorou I, Denis M, Debre P, Autran B. Cell-mediated suppression of HIV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1989;143:2193–2201. [PubMed]
45. Sadat-Sowti B, Debre P, Mollet L, Quint L, Hadida F, Leblond V, Bismuth G, Autran B. An inhibitor of cytotoxic functions produced by CD8+CD57+ T lymphocytes from patients suffering from AIDS and immunosuppressed bone marrow recipients. Eur J Immunol. 1994;24:2882–2888. [PubMed]
46. Basse P, Herberman RB, Nannmark U, Johansson BR, Hokland M, Wasserman K, Goldfarb RH. Accumulation of adoptively transferred adherent, lymphokine-activated killer cells in murine metastases. J Exp Med. 1991;174:479–488. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Basse PH, Herberman RB, Hokland ME, Goldfarb RH. Tissue distribution of adoptively transferred adherent LAK cells: role of the route of administration. Nat Immun. 1992;11:193–202. [PubMed]
48. Dixon AE, Mandac JB, Martin PJ, Hackman RC, Madtes DK, Clark JG. Adherence of adoptively transferred alloreactive Th1 cells in lung: partial dependence on LFA-1 and ICAM-1. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000;279:L583–591. [PubMed]
49. Maghazachi A, Goldfarb R, Herberman R. Natural killer cells and host defense. Karger; Basel: 1989. Effect of carbohydrates on the in vivo migration of purified LAK cells. pp. 242–245.
50. Thatte J, Dabak V, Williams MB, Braciale TJ, Ley K. LFA-1 is required for retention of effector CD8 T cells in mouse lungs. Blood. 2003;101:4916–4922. [PubMed]
51. Ratner S, Wei WZ, Oliver J. Enhancement of T cell localization in mammary tumors through transient inhibition of T cell myosin function. Cell Immunol. 2005;233:1–10. [PubMed]
52. Sasaki A, Jain RK, Maghazachi AA, Goldfarb RH, Herberman RB. Low deformability of lymphokine-activated killer cells as a possible determinant of in vivo distribution. Cancer Res. 1989;49:3742–3746. [PubMed]
53. Greene JM, Burwitz BJ, Blasky AJ, Mattila TL, Hong JJ, Rakasz EG, Wiseman RW, Hasenkrug KJ, Skinner PJ, O'Connor SL, O'Connor DH. Allogeneic lymphocytes persist and traffic in feral MHC-matched mauritian cynomolgus macaques. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2384. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Ely KH, Cookenham T, Roberts AD, Woodland DL. Memory T cell populations in the lung airways are maintained by continual recruitment. J Immunol. 2006;176:537–543. [PubMed]
55. Strickland D, Kees UR, Holt PG. Regulation of T-cell activation in the lung: isolated lung T cells exhibit surface phenotypic characteristics of recent activation including down-modulated T-cell receptors, but are locked into the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. Immunology. 1996;87:242–249. [PubMed]
56. Harris NL, Watt V, Ronchese F, Le Gros G. Differential T cell function and fate in lymph node and nonlymphoid tissues. J Exp Med. 2002;195:317–326. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Hogan RJ, Cauley LS, Ely KH, Cookenham T, Roberts AD, Brennan JW, Monard S, Woodland DL. Long-term maintenance of virus-specific effector memory CD8+ T cells in the lung airways depends on proliferation. J Immunol. 2002;169:4976–4981. [PubMed]
58. Paine R, 3rd, Chavis A, Gaposchkin D, Christensen P, Mody CH, Turka LA, Toews GB. A factor secreted by a human pulmonary alveolar epithelial-like cell line blocks T-cell proliferation between G1 and S phase. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1992;6:658–666. [PubMed]
59. Strickland D, Kees UR, Holt PG. Regulation of T-cell activation in the lung: alveolar macrophages induce reversible T-cell anergy in vitro associated with inhibition of interleukin-2 receptor signal transduction. Immunology. 1996;87:250–258. [PubMed]
60. Veazey RS, Tham IC, Mansfield KG, DeMaria M, Forand AE, Shvetz DE, Chalifoux LV, Sehgal PK, Lackner AA. Identifying the target cell in primary simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection: highly activated memory CD4(+) T cells are rapidly eliminated in early SIV infection in vivo. J Virol. 2000;74:57–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]