PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Hypertension. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 January 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2796286
NIHMSID: NIHMS161221

Thiazide Diuretics Alone or with Beta-blockers Impair Glucose Metabolism in Hypertensive Patients with Abdominal Obesity

Randomized clinical trials in patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors have shown that anti-hypertensive therapy with thiazide diuretics and beta-blockers is associated with increased incidence of new onset diabetes and other metabolic abnormalities (1,2). There is growing evidence that those patients with central obesity and other components of the cardiometabolic syndrome are especially prone to new onset diabetes (15). In persons with abdominal obesity, hypertension, and impaired fasting glucose, there is a 3- to 5-fold increase in the risk for incident diabetes (4). In this context, there is growing evidence of an association between antihypertensive induced new onset diabetes and associated increases in CVD morbidity and mortality from stroke and myocardial infarction (6).

In the current issue of Hypertension (7), the impact of abdominal obesity on the incidence of adverse metabolic effects accompanying antihypertensive therapy was examined in a population of hypertensive patients treated with atenolol and/or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). A total of 395 middle-age patients, without diabetes and/or heart disease (considered low-risk hypertensive patients), participating in the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses study, were included. Patients were randomized to HCTZ or atenolol and the medication was titrated up to the maximum study dose (HCTZ 25 mg, atenolol 100 mg). Combination therapy with these two agents was instituted if target blood pressure <120/70 mm Hg was not achieved with either drug. The mean duration of monotherapy and combination therapy was six weeks, respectively. At baseline, abdominal obesity was present in 58% of the study population, and within this cohort, 20% had impaired fasting glucose at baseline compared with 40% at the end study. Hypertensive patients with abdominal obesity, exposed to HCTZ alone or in combination with atenolol, had a significantly increased frequency of impaired fasting glucose and insulin resistance, measured by homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), as well as new onset diabetes. Indeed, new onset diabetes occurred in 6% of the cohort with abdominal obesity, and in 2% of those without abdominal obesity. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the use of HCTZ, female gender, and baseline uric acid levels strongly predicted the incidence of new onset diabetes in hypertensive patients manifesting abdominal obesity. Thus, results from this investigation complement earlier studies which report that hypertensive patients with abdominal obesity and accompanying metabolic abnormalities are especially vulnerable to the development of new onset diabetes with HCTZ and/or beta-blocker antihypertensive therapy.

The use of thiazide diuretics has been shown to be associated with adverse metabolic effects including hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperuricemia, dyslipidemia, and impaired glucose metabolism (1). Our understanding of the mechanisms involved in thiazide diuretic and beta-blocker induced abnormalities of glucose metabolism is incomplete and evolving (1,2) (Fig 1). In previous trials the baseline predictors of new onset diabetes during treatment with antihypertensives included increasing age, female sex, minority ethnicity, body mass index and waist circumference, elevated fasting and post-prandial glucose, low HDL, presence of left ventricular hypertrophy and the degree of elevation of both diastolic and systolic blood pressures (14). The relative impact of various predisposing factors appears to differ for diuretics versus that for beta-blockers. For example, hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia appear to contribute to a dose-related diabetogenic potential of thiazide diuretics (1). Low serum levels of these cations have been reported to be associated with both impairment of β-cell insulin secretion and insulin metabolic signaling in skeletal muscle, liver and adipose tissue (1) (Fig 1). In this regard, neither baseline potassium nor change in potassium with treatment, predicted either impaired fasting glucose or new onset diabetes in the current study (7). However, hyperuricemia did emerge as a relatively important risk factor for impaired glucose metabolism and new onset diabetes (7).

Figure 1
Mechanisms by which hydrochlorothiazide and beta blockers may impair glucose metabolism in hypertensive patients with abdominal obesity. PI3-K indicates phosphoinositol 3-kinase; Akt, protein kinase B; Glut4, glucose transporter 4; ACE, angiotensin converting ...

Increased systemic and tissue inflammation are increasingly recognized as important factors contributing to the pathogenesis of thiazide diuretic- induced impairment of glucose metabolism, especially in those hypertensive persons with abdominal obesity and other components of the cardiometabolic syndrome (5,6) (Fig 1). For example, in a recent study, the use of HCTZ, compared with an angiotensin receptor blocker or placebo was associated with impaired insulin sensitivity in a cohort of abdominally obese hypertensive patients (8). Impaired insulin sensitivity paralleled increased fat deposition in the liver and was associated with augmented inflammatory markers. Thiazide diuretic therapy has also been shown to increase C-reactive protein and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, to elevate components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and to reduce adiponectin, an adipocyte derived factor that improves insulin metabolic signaling (1,4) (Fig 1). Indeed, abdominal obesity is also associated with elevated aldosterone levels, and there is emerging evidence that aldosterone promotes insulin resistance by increasing oxidative stress and inflammation in insulin sensitive tissues (1). Accordingly, although not measured in the current study, it is likely that aldosterone levels were high in the patients with abdominal obesity treated with HCTZ and/or atenolol (7).

Non-vasodilating beta-blockers such as atenolol and metoprolol have been reported to worsen insulin sensitivity, alter lipid metabolism and cause weight gain (9,10). Other potential mechanisms through which these conventional beta-blockers impair glucose metabolism include decreased exercise, decreased skeletal muscle blood flow, decreased islet cell insulin secretion and the antagonistic effects of blockade of the beta-2 receptor on insulin metabolic signaling (9,10) (Fig 1). The newer vasodilating beta-blockers such as carvedilol and nebivolol do not appear to have these negative metabolic properties (10). To this point, Bakris et al., examined the impact of two commonly prescribed beta-blockers in type 2 diabetic hypertensive patients (9). Using HOMA-IR measurements, these investigators reported detriments in insulin sensitivity in those persons who were treated with metoprolol when compared with individuals treated with carvedilol. In addition, hemoglobin A1C measurements were significantly higher in the metoprolol treated group. Interestingly, the persons treated with carvedilol did not gain as much weight as those treated with metoprolol. Similarly, nebivolol, another vasodilating beta-blocker, that reduces vascular oxidative stress and increases bioavailable nitric oxide, does not cause deterioration in insulin sensitivity even in overweight hypertensive patients with the cardiometabolic syndrome (10). These disparate data, with vasodilating vs. conventional beta-blocker therapy, suggest that reduced blood flow, particularly in the skeletal muscle microcirculation, is an important mechanism for the insulin resistance engendered by non-vasodilating beta-blockers (Fig 1). Thus, the use of newer vasodilating beta-blockers agents might result in fewer metabolic side effects, especially in those hypertensive patients with accompanying abdominal obesity and associated metabolic abnormalities (10).

In summary, the use of thiazides and conventional non-vasodilating beta-blockers has been clearly linked to impaired carbohydrate metabolism, especially in those at increased risk such as the hypertensive patients with abdominal obesity, as reported in the current study (7). The recognition of the various risk factors that predispose hypertensive patients to diabetes mellitus, in relation to the specific antihypertensive agents, should help the clinician to better choose an antihypertensive regimen that avoids weight gain and other factors that contribute to impaired glucose metabolism. In this regard, the combination of thiazide diuretics and conventional beta-blockers should be used with care in overweight hypertensive patients.

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding: JRS is funded by the NIH, the VA, Novartis and Forest Laboratory grants. CM has a Fellows grant from Forest Laboratories

Footnotes

Disclosures: JRS is on the research advisory boards of Novartis and Forest Laboratories.

References

1. Stump CS, Hamilton MT, Sowers JR. Effect of antihypertensive agents on the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1637–1638. [PubMed]
2. Elliot WJ, Meyer PM. Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;369:201–207. [PubMed]
3. Barzilay JI, Davis BR, Cutler JA, Pressel SL, Whelton PK, Basile J, Margolis KL, Ong ST, Sadler LS, Summerson J. for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Fasting glucose levels and incident diabetes mellitus in older nondiabetic adults randomized to receive 3 different classes of antihypertensive treatment: a report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2191–2201. [PubMed]
4. Ford ES, Li C, Sattar N. Metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes: current state of the evidence. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1898–1904. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Bakris G, Stockert J, Molitch M, Zhou Q, Champion A, Bacher P, Sowers J. STAR Investigators. Risk factor assessment for new onset diabetes: literature review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11:177–187. [PubMed]
6. Almgren T, Wilhelmsen L, Samuelsson O, Himmelmann A, Rosengren A, Andersson OK, Nilson PM. Diabetes in treated hypertension is common and carries a high cardiovascular risk: results from a 28-year follow-up. J Hypertens. 2007;25:1311–1317. [PubMed]
7. Cooper-DeHoff RM, Wen S, Beitelshees AL, Zineh I, Gums JG, Turner ST, Gong Y, Hall K, Parekh V, Chapman AB, Boerwinkle E, Johnson JA. Impact of abdominal obesity on incidence of adverse metabolic effects associated with antihypertensive medications. Hypertension. 2009 submitted. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Eriksson JW, Jansson PA, Carlberg B, Hagg A, Kurland L, Svensson MK, Ahlstrom H, Strom C, Lonn L, Ojbrandt K, Johansson L, Lind L. Hydrochlorothiazide, but not candesartan, aggravates insulin resistance and causes visceral and hepatic fat accumulation: the mechanisms for the diabetes preventing effect of Candesartan (MEDICA) Study. Hypertension. 2008;52:1030–1037. [PubMed]
9. Bakris GL, Fonseca V, Katholi RE, McGill JB, Messerli FH, Phillips RA, Raskin P, Wright JT, Jr, Oakes R, Lukas MA, Anderson KM, Bell DSH. for the GEMINI Investigators. Metabolic effects of carvedilol vs metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292:2227–2236. [PubMed]
10. Manrique C, Giles TD, Ferdinand KC, Sowers JR. Realities of newer β-blockers for the management of hypertension. J Clin Hypertens. 2009;11:369–375. [PubMed]