PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Clin Virol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 December 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2794836
NIHMSID: NIHMS154873

Cytomegalovirus-specific, high-avidity IgG with neutralizing activity in maternal circulation enriched in the fetal bloodstream

Abstract

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the major cause of congenital infection and disease leading to permanent birth defects. In about 35–40% of pregnant women with primary CMV infection, virus crosses the placenta, resulting in the birth of congenitally infected babies. In contrast, this happens in only 1–3% of seropositive women with strong CMV-specific humoral immunity. Whether CMV reaches the fetus and disseminates depends on the level of high-avidity antibodies in the maternal circulation and the passive immunity of the fetus.

Objectives and study design

To identify CMV infection in uncomplicated deliveries based on detection of viral DNA in placental biopsy specimens at term. To quantify CMV-specific IgG avidity, neutralizing titer, IgG1 concentration, and characterize the immunoblot profiles for CMV proteins in paired samples of placental and cord blood sera.

Results

In accord with earlier reports, CMV DNA was detected in 39% (11/28) of placentas with mean- to high-avidity CMV-specific IgG. In seropositive women, the concentration of antiviral antibodies, specifically IgG1, increased in the fetal bloodstream, and CMV neutralizing titers in maternal and fetal blood were comparable.

Conclusions

CMV-specific, high-avidity neutralizing antibodies from maternal circulation are transcytosed to the fetal bloodstream, contribute to suppression of viral replication in the placenta and could prevent congenital disease.

Keywords: congenital CMV infection, passive immunity, neonatal Fc receptor, high-avidity IgG, neutralizing titer

1. Introduction

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the leading cause of congenital viral infection in the United States. Birth defects from congenital CMV disease are as frequent as those from Down syndrome, fetal alcohol syndrome and neural tube defects.1 Epidemiological studies report sharp ethnic/racial disparities in congenital disease, with the highest force of infection in non-Hispanic blacks (5.7%) and Mexican Americans (5.1%).1, 2 Each year thousands of pregnant women become infected with CMV, and most are unaware of congenital CMV disease.3 In 35–40% of these primary infected case, virus will be transmitted to the fetus, a quarter of whom will have permanent birth defects: hearing loss, mental retardation, cerebral palsy, seizures and chorioretinitis.47 Some babies will die before birth or in early childhood.

Symptoms of viral infection in the fetus and the newborn are more severe when primary maternal infection occurs in early gestation8 or near the time of conception.9, 10 Prenatal diagnosis by CMV isolation or detection of viral DNA in amniotic fluid and maternal blood indicates a 4- to 6-week window between primary infection, transplacental transmission and fetal infection.911 Recurrent infections are mostly asymptomatic when mothers have CMV-specific, high-avidity immunoglobulin G (IgG).12, 13 Although universal screening of pregnant women for CMV antibodies is a feasible approach to identify those at risk for transmission,14 large-scale testing has not been implemented.10, 15, 16 In infected neonates, virus can be found in serum,17, 18 urine19, 20 and saliva.21

Passive immunity of the fetus to pathogens depends on transcytosis of maternal IgG facilitated by the neonatal Fc receptor in syncytiotrophoblasts of the placenta and progressively increases in the last trimester of gestation.22, 23 Studies from our group have shown that the extent of CMV replication in the placenta depends on the degree of maternal immunity.2426 In early gestation, the neonatal Fc receptor transcytoses IgG and immune complexes of virions across the syncytiotrophoblasts and CMV glycoprotein B (gB) accumulates in caveolae.27 With low neutralizing titers, CMV replication proteins are detected in cytotrophoblast progenitor cells in the placenta; high levels of CMV DNA are present, and fetal blood vessels contain neutrophils with viral replication proteins. 26 With moderate neutralizing titers, occasional focal infection is found in villous cytotrophoblasts. With high neutralizing titers, little if any viral replication occurs in the placenta although viral DNA and virion gB are present in syncytiotrophoblasts and fetal macrophages in the villous core.

In the study reported here, we examined placental biopsy specimens from uncomplicated deliveries at term for viral DNA and analyzed CMV-specific antibodies in sera from fetal (cord) blood and from maternal blood in the placental intervillous space to quantify antiviral antibodies. We found that CMV-specific, high-avidity IgG with neutralizing activity was elevated in the fetal bloodstream as compared with the maternal circulation and that viral DNA in the placenta was reduced in the presence of high-avidity IgG.

2. Methods

2.1. Biopsy samples

Biopsy samples were obtained from non-selected population of 54 pregnancies with uncomplicated deliveries at Moffitt Hospital, University of California–San Francisco, with approval of the institutional review board. According to the requirement of the Committee on Human Research approval for this research program, no identifiers about maternal age, race or ethnicity were obtained. The population of the greater metropolitan area of San Francisco estimated by the American Community Survey of the U.S. Census Bureau (2005–2007) includes caucasians (56.3%), African Americans (7.6%), Asians (33.2%) and other races (5.9%).

Immediately after delivery, blood was collected from the umbilical cord (fetal) and the intervillous blood space (maternal). Table 1 lists seropositive serum samples from placentas that contained CMV DNA (Group A), or did not (Group B). Paired sera from maternal and fetal blood samples (n=54) were subjected to the following analyses: IgG1 subclass (n=41), CMV-specific IgG (n=41), CMV-specific IgG avidity (n=52), neutralization titers (n=48) and immunoblot assay (n=54). From each placenta (n=54), five biopsy specimens were excised, one at the center and four at the periphery, and flash frozen. CMV DNA was detected by PCR from each biopsy specimen (n=270).

Table 1
Serological analysis of CMV-seropositive women with uncomplicated deliveries.

2.2. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

DNA was extracted from 10–25 mg of biopsy specimens using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen) and stored at −20°C. DNA from human foreskin fibroblasts infected with the clinical CMV strain VR1814 28 was used as a positive control. DNA from uninfected cells and water were used as negative controls. The presence of CMV DNA was analyzed by nested-PCR using primers for immediate-early (IE) genes.29 Briefly, 25 µl of reaction mixture contained 1x REDTaqBuffer (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.2 mM dNTP mixture, 0.2 µM of each primer, 0.5 Unit REDTaq DNA polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich), and 5 µl of extracted DNA. Cycle conditions were one cycle of 2 min at 94°C followed by 40 cycles of 45s at 94°C, 45s at 50°C and 1 min at 72°C, and final incubation for 2 min at 72°C. First PCR product (2 µl) were subjected to 2nd PCR. Cycle conditions for 2nd PCR were same as 1st PCR except for applying 30 cycles of reaction. PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis. CMV gB genotype was determined by nested PCR using the AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems), followed by sequencing as described previously.29 An outer primer pair—gBout and gBout230—and an inner primer set29 were used.

2.3. IgG subclass analysis

The concentration of each IgG subclass in maternal and fetal was quantified using the human IgG subclass ELISA kit (Invitrogen). IgG1 concentration was quantified using the human IgG1 subclass profile kit (Invitrogen).

2.4. CMV IgG ELISA

CMV-specific IgG was measured using the CMV ELISA Quantitation Kit (GenWay).

2.5. CMV-specific IgG avidity assay

CMV-specific IgG avidity was analyzed using an enzyme immunoassay (CMV IgG avidity, Radim) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, sera were diluted 1:300 and applied to the CMV antigen-coated plate in duplicate. After the first incubation and washing, replicate wells were incubated with buffers with or without urea. Bound antibody was detected with horseradish peroxide-conjugated anti-human IgG, followed by color development with tetramethylbenzidine. The ratio between the optical densities of the wells in buffer with or without urea was calculated and expressed as percent avidity.

2.6. Neutralization assay

CMV neutralization assays were performed as described with modifications.31 Briefly, human foreskin fibroblasts were seeded in 24-well plates with cover glass slides (2 × 104 cells/well). Sera were heat-inactivated (56°C) for 30 min. Two hundred fifty microliters of diluted sera (1:8–1:1,024) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) was incubated in duplicate with an equal amount of VR1814 virus stock (103 PFU per well) for 1 h at 37°C. The virus–serum mixture was added to the confluent monolayer of human foreskin fibroblasts and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, cultured with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 24 h, and fixed with 70% methanol. Cover slips were stained with mouse monoclonal antibody CH160 against IE1 and -2 proteins.32 IE1&2-positive nuclei were visualized using fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) and examined using a Nikon Eclipse 50i microscope. The serum dilution that produced 50% inhibition of virus infectivity was reported as the neutralizing titer.

2.7. Immunoblot assay

CMV-specific antibodies were characterized using the recomBlot CMV IgG kit (Mikrogen). Purified recombinant CMV proteins (IE1, p150, CM2, p65, gB1 and gB2) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate—polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immobilized on nitrocellulose membrane strips. The strips were incubated with diluted serum (1:100), and specific bands were visualized by horseradish peroxide-conjugated anti-human IgG followed by substrate solution. Recent infection, long-past (remote) infection, and reactivation/recurrent infection were assessed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.7. Statistical analysis

The statistical significance of the data was analyzed by one-tailed, paired Student’s t-test. P values of < 0.01 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. IgG1 transcytosed from mother to fetus across the placenta

In the first set of experiments, the concentration of different IgG subclasses in maternal and fetal circulation was measured in 8 paired serum samples and the mean ratio of fetal/maternal IgG subclass was calculated (Fig. 1A). The mean ratio of fetal to maternal IgG1 concentration was significantly higher than that of IgG2 (P = 0.0031), IgG3 (P = 0.0025), and IgG4 (P = 0.0032) (Fig. 1A). The mean ratio of fetal to maternal IgG subclasses concentration were as follows: IgG1 (1.56) > IgG4 (1.21) > IgG2 (1.17) > IgG3 (1.13). We quantified the IgG1 concentration in 41 paired maternal and fetal serum samples. As anticipated, IgG1 concentration in fetal sera was significantly higher than that in maternal sera and the mean ratio was 2.18 (range, 0.33–5.74). Next, we compared the placental IgG1 transfer (fetal/maternal IgG1 concentration ratio) to the maternal IgG1 concentration by scatter diagrams.33 The fetal/maternal IgG1 concentration ratio was reciprocally correlated to the maternal IgG1 concentration (Fig. 1B). These results confirm that IgG1 in maternal circulation is transcytosed across the placenta and significantly elevated in the fetal bloodstream.

Fig. 1
IgG1 subclass is preferentially transcytosed from mother to fetus across the placenta. (Panel A) The ratio of each IgG subclass concentration in fetal (cord) blood to that in maternal (placental) blood (8 paired samples). The mean ratio for IgG1 was significantly ...

3.2. Increased CMV-specific, high-avidity neutralizing antibodies in the fetus

We determined the presence of CMV-specific IgG and measured the avidity in 52 paired samples. CMV IgG ELISA indicated that 26 pairs were seronegative or from recent seroconversions and the avidity was below the cutoff value (≤ 2%) (data not shown). In 26 paired sera that contained CMV-specific IgG, the mean avidity in fetal sera (61.6%) was significantly higher than that in maternal sera (57.5%, P < 0.01) although the differences were small (Table 1). The scatter plot of relationship between maternal and fetal IgG avidity showed positive correlations in individual mother-infant pairs (Fig. 2). Neutralization assays for 26 paired sera that contained CMV-specific IgG confirmed that the presence of high-avidity IgG paralleled that of neutralizing activity (1:8 to 1:256). Together these results indicate that the increased CMV-specific, high-avidity IgG in fetal circulation had virus neutralizing activity.

Fig. 2
CMV-specific, high-avidity IgG is preferentially transcytosed across the placenta. CMV-specific IgG avidity was analyzed in paired maternal and fetal sera. Scatter diagrams shows CMV-specific IgG avidity in paired serum samples (n= 26) that were CMV-specific ...

3.3. CMV proteins recognized by circulating IgG in recurrent maternal infection

Immunoreactivity to CMV proteins in 54 paired sera was characterized using immunoblot (recomBlot) assays to identify major viral antigens recognized by circulating IgG. Figure 3 shows representative staining profiles for CMV proteins of paired serum samples with mean to high-avidity IgG (Fig. 3, sera 113, 144, 125). Negative or weak reactions were obtained with sera lacking CMV-specific IgG by a commercial assay (Fig. 3, sera 128, 134, 142). Eleven maternal serum samples (20%) with high avidity IgG reacted with p150, gB1 and gB2, a profile that indicates long-past (remote) infection. Twelve paired serum samples (22%) reacted with IE1, p150, gB1 and gB2, suggesting recurrent infection during gestation. Although profiles of paired serum samples were comparable, a broader profile of viral proteins was occasionally recognized in fetal sera (Table 1, Group A, placentas 57, 127; Group B, placenta 120). Profiles of 5 paired serum samples (9%) with high-avidity IgG, neutralizing titers and weak (low) reactions with viral peptides CM2, p65, gB1 or gB2, a profile that suggested infection occurred several months before conception (Table 1, placentas 124, 158, 146, 135, 131). Three paired serum samples (6%) were weakly reactive with IE1, p65, and p150, lacked IgG avidity and neutralizing antibodies, suggesting that these mothers may have acquired a primary infection only recently (data not shown). Twenty-three paired serum samples (43%) lacked CMV-specific IgG and showed negative reactions by immunoblot assays (data not shown).

Fig. 3
IgG reactivity to CMV proteins in paired serum samples. CMV protein profiles of placental (p) and cord blood (c) using the recomBlot kit (Mikrogen). Representative protein profiles obtained with high-avidity IgG are seen in samples 113, 144 and 125; those ...

3.4. High-avidity IgG associated with reduced levels of CMV DNA in the placenta

Placentas from CMV-specific IgG seropositive women (Table 1, n=28) and those lacking CMV-specific IgG measured with a commercial assay (n=26) (data not shown) were examined for the presence of CMV DNA. Five biopsy specimens from each placenta were evaluated using PCR. Viral DNA was detected in 50% (13/26) of placentas lacking CMV-specific IgG, avidity, and with weak or negative immunoblot reactions indicating very recent primary infection. In contrast, CMV DNA was found in 39% (11/28) of placentas with mean to high-avidity IgG in maternal and/or fetal sera. To determine whether reactivation of endogenous strains or possible reinfection with a second CMV strain had occurred, CMV gB genotypes were analyzed in 10 placentas. Of these, we detected gB3 in 70% (7/10), gB2 in 10% (1/10) and coinfections with gB2 and gB3 in 20% (2/10). Interestingly, one coinfection was a recent primary infection lacking detectable CMV-specific IgG (data not shown) and another was recurrent infection or reactivation (Table 1, placenta 104). These results showed that simultaneous infection with two strains could occur in women who seroconvert or undergo recurrent infection.

4. Discussion

We analyzed (i) paired samples of fetal cord blood and maternal blood from the placenta from uncomplicated deliveries at term for CMV-specific IgG and (ii) five biopsy specimens from each placenta for viral DNA. Our results indicate that significantly increased IgG1 levels, CMV-specific neutralizing antibodies with high avidity that recognize gB constitute passive immunity acquired by the fetus. Development of these high-avidity antibodies suppresses viral replication in the placenta26 and precludes symptomatic fetal infection.7, 34, 35 Passive immunity escalates in the third trimester of pregnancy22 mediated by the neonatal Fc receptor23 that mediates transcytosis of CMV-specific IgG across sycnytiotrophoblasts to the fetal compartment.27 The CMV-specific IgG avidity test is one of the most reliable procedures to identify the timing of primary maternal infection since avidity increases progressively as the immune response matures.31, 34. Low-avidity IgG is present in acute or recent primary maternal infection and persists for approximately 5 months in immunocompetent persons.36 High-avidity IgG indicates long-past or remote infection. In addition, the combination of PCR to detect viral DNA, gB genotyping to determine simultaneous infection with multiple strains, and immunoblot analysis of proteins recognized by maternal IgG provides a more comprehensive picture of ongoing infection at the uterine-placental interface. Results of the present study support our earlier finding that two CMV strains can be detected in primary maternal infection.25, 26 It should be mentioned that we did not anticipate finding CMV DNA in placentas from women judged to be seronegative for CMV-specific IgG using a commercial assay. We cannot exclude the possibility that nested-PCR analysis could give some false positive results. Nonetheless, results of this study agree with other published reports that CMV DNA is detected in many placentas from uneventful pregnancies.24, 26, 27, 29 Thus, the sensitivity of present commercial ELISA assays for CMV IgG could be less sensitive. Possible reasons include the use of laboratory strains to prepare viral antigen, extraction procedures, and inclusion of buffers designed to reduce non-specific binding. Current efforts focus on evaluating these samples for additional evidence of infection including the presence of CMV-specific IgM.

These results extend those of earlier studies showing that CMV frequently reactivates in seropositive women and that a high level of maternal neutralizing antibodies reduces viral replication in the placenta and limits possible transmission to the fetus.25, 26 Circulating maternal IgG1 with high avidity and virus-neutralizing activity, transcytosed by the neonatal Fc receptor across the placenta, increases in concentration in the fetal bloodstream. CMV gB is a major target for neutralizing antibodies,3739 and IgG1 reacts with both linear epitopes and domains on the full-length gB complex.40 Thus, protective, antiviral IgG can cross the placenta and reach higher levels in the fetal bloodstream.

Our results revealed that IgG avidity and passive immunity to CMV in the fetus exceeds that in the circulation of immune women with uncomplicated deliveries. Specifically, the results provide a strong rationale for large-scale clinical studies to evaluate prenatal treatment of women diagnosed with primary infection during pregnancy with CMV-specific hyperimmune globulin to suppress virus replication in the developing placenta.41 A combination of immunization of susceptible woman of childbearing age and passive immunization in management of maternal gestational infection could ultimately prevent congenital CMV disease.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jean Perry for assistance in obtaining placentas and cord blood and Mary McKenney for editing the manuscript. This work was supported by grants AI46657-09 and AI073752-01 from the National Institutes of Health and by grant 02821-7 from the Thrasher Research Fund (L.P.). N.N. was supported by Japan Herpesvirus Infections Forum, Scholarship Awards in Herpesvirus Infections Research.

Abbreviations

CMV
cytomegalovirus
DMEM
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
ELISA
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
gB
glycoprotein B
IE
immediate early
PCR
polymerase chain reaction

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Colugnati FA, Staras SA, Dollard SC, Cannon MJ. Incidence of cytomegalovirus infection among the general population and pregnant women in the United States. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:71. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Istas AS, Demmler GJ, Dobbins JG, Stewart JA. Surveillance for congenital cytomegalovirus disease: a report from the National Congenital Cytomegalovirus Disease Registry. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:665–670. [PubMed]
3. Jeon J, Victor M, Adler SP, Arwady A, Demmler G, Fowler K, et al. Knowledge and awareness of congenital cytomegalovirus among women. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2006;2006:1–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Pass RF. Cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatr Rev. 2002;23:163–170. [PubMed]
5. Pass RF, Fowler KB, Boppana SB, Britt WJ, Stagno S. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection following first trimester maternal infection: symptoms at birth and outcome. J Clin Virol. 2006;35:216–220. [PubMed]
6. Britt WJ. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection. In: Hitchcock PJ, MacKay HT, Wasserheit JN, editors. Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Adverse Outcomes of Pregnancy. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1999. pp. 269–281.
7. Fowler KB, Stagno S, Pass RF, Britt WJ, Boll TJ, Alford CA. The outcome of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in relation to maternal antibody status. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:663–667. [PubMed]
8. Stagno S, Pass RF, Cloud G, Britt WJ, Henderson RE, Walton PD, et al. Primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Incidence, transmission to fetus and clinical outcome. JAMA. 1986;256:1904–1908. [PubMed]
9. Revello MG, Zavattoni M, Furione M, Fabbri E, Gerna G. Preconceptional primary human cytomegalovirus infection and risk of congenital infection. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:783–787. [PubMed]
10. Revello MG, Zavattoni M, Furione M, Lilleri D, Gorini G, Gerna G. Diagnosis and outcome of preconceptional and periconceptional primary human cytomegalovirus infections. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:553–557. [PubMed]
11. Revello MG, Sarasini A, Zavattoni M, Baldanti F, Gerna G. Improved prenatal diagnosis of congenital human cytomegalovirus infection by a modified nested polymerase chain reaction. J Med Virol. 1998;56:99–103. [PubMed]
12. Fowler KB, Stagno S, Pass RF. Maternal immunity and prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. JAMA. 2003;289:1008–1011. [PubMed]
13. Stagno S, Pass RF, Dworsky ME, Henderson RE, Moore EG, Walton PD, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: The relative importance of primary and recurrent maternal infection. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:945–949. [PubMed]
14. Naessens A, Casteels A, Decatte L, Foulon W. A serologic strategy for detecting neonates at risk for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr. 2005;146:194–197. [PubMed]
15. Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol. 2007;17:253–276. [PubMed]
16. Demmler GJ. Screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: a tapestry of controversies. J Pediatr. 2005;146:162–164. [PubMed]
17. Nelson CT, Istas AS, Wilkerson MK, Demmler GJ. PCR detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in serum as a diagnostic test for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:3317–3318. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Noyola DE, Demmler GJ, Nelson CT, Griesser C, Williamson WD, Atkins JT, et al. Early predictors of neurodevelopmental outcome in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr. 2001;138:325–331. [PubMed]
19. Demmler GJ, Buffone GJ, Schimbor CM, May RA. Detection of cytomegalovirus in urine from newborns by using polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification. J Infect Dis. 1988;158:1177–1184. [PubMed]
20. Noyola DE, Demmler GJ, Williamson WD, Griesser C, Sellers S, Llorente A, et al. Cytomegalovirus urinary excretion and long term outcome in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Congenital CMV Longitudinal Study Group. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19:505–510. [PubMed]
21. Yamamoto AY, Mussi-Pinhata MM, Marin LJ, Brito RM, Oliveira PF, Coelho TB. Is saliva as reliable as urine for detection of cytomegalovirus DNA for neonatal screening of congenital CMV infection? J Clin Virol. 2006;36:228–230. [PubMed]
22. Malek A, Sager R, Kuhn P, Nicolaides KH, Schneider H. Evolution of maternofetal transport of immunoglobulins during human pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1996;36:248–255. [PubMed]
23. Simister NE. Placental transport of immunoglobulin G. Vaccine. 2003;21:3365–3369. [PubMed]
24. Fisher S, Genbacev O, Maidji E, Pereira L. Human cytomegalovirus infection of placental cytotrophoblasts in vitro and in utero: implications for transmission and pathogenesis. J Virol. 2000;74:6808–6820. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. McDonagh S, Maidji E, Ma W, Chang HT, Fisher S, Pereira L. Viral and bacterial pathogens at the maternal-fetal interface. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:826–834. [PubMed]
26. Pereira L, Maidji E, McDonagh S, Genbacev O, Fisher S. Human cytomegalovirus transmission from the uterus to the placenta correlates with the presence of pathogenic bacteria and maternal immunity. J Virol. 2003;77:13301–13314. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Maidji E, McDonagh S, Genbacev O, Tabata T, Pereira L. Maternal antibodies enhance or prevent cytomegalovirus infection in the placenta by neonatal Fc receptor-mediated transcytosis. Am J Pathol. 2006;168:1210–1226. [PubMed]
28. Revello MG, Baldanti F, Percivalle E, Sarasini A, De-Giuli L, Genini E, et al. In vitro selection of human cytomegalovirus variants unable to transfer virus and virus products from infected cells to polymorphonuclear leukocytes and to grow in endothelial cells. J Gen Virol. 2001;82:1429–1438. [PubMed]
29. McDonagh S, Maidji E, Chang HT, Pereira L. Patterns of human cytomegalovirus infection in term placentas: a preliminary analysis. J Clin Virol. 2006;35:210–215. [PubMed]
30. Yan H, Koyano S, Inami Y, Yamamoto Y, Suzutani T, Mizuguchi M, et al. Genetic variations in the gB, UL144 and UL149 genes of human cytomegalovirus strains collected from congenitally and postnatally infected Japanese children. Arch Virol. 2008;153:667–674. [PubMed]
31. Eggers M, Bader U, Enders G. Combination of microneutralization and avidity assays: improved diagnosis of recent primary human cytomegalovirus infection in single serum sample of second trimester pregnancy. J Med Virol. 2000;60:324–330. [PubMed]
32. Dondero DV, Pereira L. Monoclonal antibody production. In: Emmons R, Schmidt N, editors. Diagnostic Procedures for Viral, Rickettsial and Chlamydial Infections. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association; 1990. pp. 101–124.
33. Hashira S, Okitsu-Negishi S, Yoshino K. Placental transfer of IgG subclasses in a Japanese population. Pediatr Int. 2000;42:337–342. [PubMed]
34. Grangeot-Keros L, Mayaux MJ, Lebon P, Freymuth F, Eugene G, Stricker R, et al. Value of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity index for the diagnosis of primary CMV infection in pregnant women. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:944–946. [PubMed]
35. Revello MG, Gerna G. Pathogenesis and prenatal diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus infection. J Clin Virol. 2004;29:71–83. [PubMed]
36. Lazzarotto T, Spezzacatena P, Pradelli P, Abate DA, Varani S, Landini MP. Avidity of immunoglobulin G directed against human cytomegalovirus during primary and secondary infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised subjects. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. 1997;4:469–473. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Britt WJ, Vugler L, Stephens EB. Induction of complement-dependent and -independent neutralizing antibodies by recombinant-derived human cytomegalovirus gp55-116 (gB) J Virol. 1988;62:3309–3318. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Navarro D, Lennette E, Tugizov S, Pereira L. Humoral immune response to functional regions of human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B. J Med Virol. 1997;52:451–459. [PubMed]
39. Qadri I, Navarro D, Paz P, Pereira L. Assembly of conformation-dependent neutralizing domains on human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B. J Gen Virol. 1992;73:2913–2921. [PubMed]
40. Urban M, Winkler T, Landini MP, Britt W, Mach M. Epitope-specific distribution of IgG subclasses against antigenic domains on glycoproteins of human cytomegalovirus. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:83–90. [PubMed]
41. Nigro G, Adler SP, La Torre R, Best AM. Passive immunization during pregnancy for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1350–1362. [PubMed]