PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of toxsciLink to Publisher's site
 
Toxicol Sci. 2010 January; 113(1): 198–206.
Published online 2009 October 4. doi:  10.1093/toxsci/kfp226
PMCID: PMC2794331

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Inhibits Fibroblast Growth Factor 10-Induced Prostatic Bud Formation in Mouse Urogenital Sinus

Abstract

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) dorsalizes the pattern of prostatic buds developing from the urogenital sinus (UGS) of male fetal mice, causing some buds to form in inappropriate positions while blocking formation of others. This teratogenic TCDD action significantly reduces prostate main duct number and causes ventral prostate agenesis in exposed males. The purpose of this study was to determine whether inhibition of fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) signaling is mechanistically linked to mouse prostatic budding impairment by TCDD. In utero TCDD exposure induced aryl hydrocarbon receptor–responsive cytochrome P450 1b1 messenger RNA (mRNA) in ventral UGS regions where Fgf10 and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (Fgfr2) mRNA were expressed and where budding was most severely inhibited by TCDD. However, TCDD exposure did not reduce Fgf10 or Fgfr2 mRNA abundance in the UGS or alter their distribution. Addition of FGF10 protein to UGS organ culture media increased the abundance of UGS basal epithelial cells immunopositive for phosphorylated extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK). FGF10 also increased the number of 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU)-labeled UGS epithelial cells and increased the number of prostatic buds formed per UGS. Addition of TCDD to UGS organ culture media did not alter FGF10-induced ERK activation in UGS basal epithelium but prevented FGF10-induced BrdU incorporation and blocked FGF10-induced prostatic bud formation. These results identify basal urogenital sinus epithelium cells as the key site of FGF10 action during fetal prostate development and suggest that TCDD likely acts downstream of FGFR2 and ERK to restrict UGS epithelial cell proliferation and prevent prostatic bud formation.

Keywords: urogenital sinus, fibroblast growth factor 10, development, mouse, TCDD, prostate

Mouse prostate development begins in utero from the fetal urogenital sinus (UGS). Androgen-responsive signals from urogenital sinus mesenchyme (UGM) stimulate formation of prostate ductal progenitors, or buds, in urogenital sinus epithelium (UGE) (Cunha and Chung, 1981; Cunha and Lung, 1978). Prostatic buds are formed in three stages. The first stage is specification, and during this period, UGM signals determine the position of buds in UGE. Buds are specified in a reproducible pattern along three axes: dorsoventral, craniocaudal, and mediolateral (Lin et al., 2003; Timms et al., 1994). The second stage is initiation, and during this period, buds first begin to extend outward into UGM. Prostatic buds continue to extend distally into UGM during the third stage, elongation. Most prostatic buds bifurcate postnatally into branched epithelial cords, canalize, and give rise to a ductal network that is organized into separate and distinct ventral, dorsolateral, and anterior prostate lobes (Sugimura et al., 1986).

Ligand-dependent activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) during fetal mouse prostate development causes prostatic buds to form in an inappropriate pattern. TCDD exposure (5 μg/kg, maternal dose) on or before embryonic day (E) 15.5 completely inhibits bud formation in the ventral UGS region and causes ventral prostate agenesis (Lin et al., 2003; Vezina et al., 2008b). TCDD also decreases the number of buds formed in the lateral UGS region and causes buds to form inappropriately in the dorsal UGS region. The prostatic bud pattern is more severely dorsalized by TCDD when exposure occurs prior to and during bud specification (E13.5) than those occurs later in UGS development and during bud initiation (Lin et al., 2003; Vezina et al., 2008b). Therefore, peak UGS sensitivity to TCDD occurs before prostatic buds are formed, during bud specification. This TCDD effect is not due to androgen insufficiency in male fetuses and is not caused by direct inhibition of androgen receptor activity (Ko et al., 2004b; Lin et al., 2003).

The UGM is the initial site of TCDD action in the UGS. This was demonstrated by functional Ahr expression in UGM, and not UGE, being required for prostatic budding inhibition by TCDD (Ko et al., 2004a). UGM-derived paracrine signaling molecules that stimulate bud formation, including fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10), are therefore likely targets of TCDD action. FGF10 is required for bud specification in multiple developing organs (Howard and Ashworth, 2006; Isaac et al., 2000; Min et al., 1998), including prostate. Very few prostatic buds form in Fgf10-null mice (Donjacour et al., 2003) and in mice deficient in one of its receptors, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (Fgfr2) (Lin et al., 2007). FGF10-induced activation of FGFR2 promotes phosphorylation and activation of extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) 1 and ERK 2, an event required for prostatic bud formation (Kuslak and Marker, 2007).

In this report, we tested the hypothesis that TCDD disrupts FGF10-induced prostatic bud formation in male mouse UGSs. Specifically, we examined whether TCDD impairs FGF10-induced bud formation, decreases abundance of Fgf10 or Fgfr2, or prevents FGF10-induced ERK activation. Our results shed light on two aspects of AHR and FGF10 signaling during mouse prostate development. First, we provide evidence that basal UGE cells are the key site of FGF10 action during prostate development in control male fetuses. Second, we demonstrate that TCDD inhibits FGF10-dependent prostatic bud formation by acting downstream of FGFR2 and ERK to disrupt basal UGE cell proliferation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and treatments.

C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were maintained as described previously (Vezina et al., 2008b). All procedures were approved by the University of Wisconsin Animal Care and Use Committee and conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. To obtain timed-pregnant dams, female mice were paired overnight with males. The next day was considered E0.5. To obtain UGS tissues exposed in utero to TCDD, pregnant mice were given a single oral dose of TCDD (5 μg/kg) or vehicle (corn oil, 5 ml/kg) on E15.5. Dams were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation 1 day later.

UGS organ culture and bud counting.

UGSs were dissected from male fetuses, placed on 0.4-μm Millicell-CM filters, and cultured as described previously (Vezina et al., 2008a) in media containing 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT; diluted from an ethanol stock solution to a final media concentration of 10nM). The following supplements were added alone or in combination to organ culture media: TCDD (Cambridge Isotopes Laboratories, Andover, MA; diluted from a dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO] stock solution to a final media concentration of 1nM) or recombinant FGF10 protein (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN; diluted from a stock containing hanks balanced salt solution and bovine serum albumin [BSA] to a final media concentration of 300 ng/ml). This concentration of TCDD was shown previously to significantly decrease the number of prostatic buds formed in UGS organ culture (Allgeier et al., 2008) and this concentration of recombinant FGF10 protein is similar to the 200 ng/ml FGF10 concentration that was shown previously to stimulate ventral prostate development in serum-free organ culture media (Thomson and Cunha, 1999). Media for all treatment groups contained appropriate vehicle controls (final media concentration of 0.1% BSA and 0.1% DMSO), 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU; diluted from an aqueous stock solution to a final media concentration of 1 μg/ml) was added to UGS organ culture media in some experiments, as indicated. Media and supplements were changed every 2 days. Some UGS tissues were harvested after 1 day for reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR analysis and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Other UGS specimens were harvested after 3 days in culture and incubated with 1% trypsin for 90 min at 4°C. UGE was then mechanically separated from UGM and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy was performed as previously described (Lin et al., 2003) at the University of Wisconsin Biological and Biomaterials Preparation, Imaging, and Characterization Laboratory. Specimens were imaged from four different angles to visualize budding across the entire UGE surface. All prostatic buds were counted by the same two persons, and prostatic bud numbers were determined by averaging the total bud counts per UGS determined by these individuals.

RNA isolation and real-time RT-PCR.

UGS homogenization, RNA isolation, and complementary DNA synthesis were performed as described previously (Vezina et al., 2008a). Real-time RT-PCR was performed as described previously (Lin et al., 2003) using the Roche LightCycler (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). PCR primers were as follows: Cyp1b1, 5′-ACATGAGTTTCAGTTATGGCC-3′ and 5′-TTCCATTCACTGCTGAGAGC-3′; Fgf10, 5′-CCCTCTCCCACCCTACATTTCC-3′ and 5′-CCCACGGAGGCAGAACTCAC-3′; Fgfr2iiib, 5′-CAGGTAGCCCATGGTCTCAG-3′ and 5′-GGTGGTGGTCCAGTACGGTG-3′, described previously by (Nyeng et al., 2007); and peptidyl prolyl isomerase a (Ppia) 5′-TCTCTCCGTAGATGGACCTG-3′ and 5′-ATCACGGCCGATGACGAGCC-3′.

Sectional in situ hybridization.

UGSs were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C. UGSs were embedded in 4% SeaPlaque agarose (Biowhittaker Molecular Applications, Rockland, ME), submerged in ice-cold PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, and sectioned (50 μm) using a vibratome fitted with a double-edged razor blade. Tissues were bleached with 6% H2O2 and digested with proteinase K. The probe for Fgf10 was described previously (Bellusci et al., 1997) and was provided by Brigid Hogan (Duke University, Durham, NC). Antisense probes for Fgfr2 (Miki et al., 1992) and Cyp1b1 (Vezina et al., 2008b) were described previously. Methods for digoxigenin-11-uridine-5′-triphosphate probe labeling and immunohistochemical visualization of antisense in situ hybridization (ISH) probes with BM purple chromagen (Roche Applied Science) were described previously (Vezina et al., 2008b). The number of sections assessed for each probe is described in the “Results” section. Tissue sections were also incubated with sense ISH probes as a control measure to ensure specificity of antisense ISH probe staining patterns. Staining was not apparent in these tissue sections (results not shown).

Immunohistochemistry.

Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated into methanol, infiltrated with paraffin, and cut into 4-μm sections. Sections were hydrated, bleached in 10% H2O2, and boiled in 10mM sodium citrate, pH 6.0, for 30 min. Tissues were washed with a solution containing 25mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 140mM NaCl, 2.7mM KCl, and 0.1% Tween-20. After blocking with goat sera (5%), tissues were incubated overnight at 4°C with blocking buffer containing rabbit anti-ERK (1:100; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA) or mouse anti-BrdU (1:100; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). Tissues were washed and incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (for ERK) or Alexafluor-488–conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (for BrdU; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Signal detection for ERK was achieved by incubating tissues with streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase followed by the Vector NovaRED Peroxidase Kit as described by the manufacturer (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The number of sections assessed for each antibody is described in the “Results” section. Tissue sections were incubated with sera from the primary antibody host animal, diluted as described for primary antibodies, as a negative control. Staining was not apparent in these tissue sections (results not shown).

Litter independence and statistical analysis.

Scanning electron microscopy was conducted on UGS epithelium from three or more litters per treatment. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), ISH, and real-time RT-PCR were performed on UGSs from three to five litters per treatment. ANOVA and Student’s t-test were conducted on untransformed data that passed Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance and appeared to be normally distributed.

RESULTS

TCDD Does Not Decrease Fgf10 Messenger RNA Abundance or Alter its Distribution in the UGS of Fetal Male Mice

To test whether TCDD quantitatively decreases Fgf10 messenger RNA (mRNA) abundance in the UGS, male fetal mice were exposed in utero to vehicle or TCDD (5 μg/kg maternal oral dose on E15.5) and Fgf10 mRNA abundance was determined in the UGS by real-time RT-PCR on E16.5 (Fig. 1A). Cyp1b1 mRNA abundance was also examined as an index of AHR activation. Although this exposure paradigm was found previously to inhibit ventral prostatic bud formation (Vezina et al., 2008b), and in this study it increased Cyp1b1 mRNA abundance (Fig. 1A), it did not significantly alter Fgf10 abundance (Fig. 1A).

FIG. 1.
In utero TCDD exposure increases Cyp1b1 mRNA abundance in ventral UGM but does not alter Fgf10 mRNA abundance or distribution in this region. Male fetal mice were exposed in utero to corn oil (vehicle) or TCDD (5 μg/kg maternal dose) on E15.5. ...

Prior to and during prostatic bud formation, Fgf10 mRNA is expressed in two UGM domains at distal poles of the dorsoventral UGS axis (Thomson and Cunha, 1999). One of these domains is a specialized UGM tissue compartment known as the ventral mesenchymal pad, VMP (Timms et al., 1995). RT-PCR of whole-UGS tissue may be incapable of detecting a VMP-localized decrease in Fgf10 abundance, even though such a decrease could impair ventral prostatic bud formation. We therefore used ISH to determine whether TCDD focally decreases Fgf10 mRNA abundance or the size of its VMP expression domain. UGS specimens (n = 6 samples per exposure group, all from independent litters) were cut along the sagittal plane and sections were processed for ISH under identical conditions. Cyp1b1 expression in vehicle-exposed UGS specimens was localized in UGM near its interface with UGE (Fig. 1B). Cyp1b1 was not detected in the VMP of vehicle-exposed UGSs, even though Fgf10 transcripts were abundant in this region. TCDD increased Cyp1b1 transcript abundance in UGM and UGE and expanded Cyp1b1 expression into the VMP where it overlapped with Fgf10. TCDD did not appear to decrease Fgf10 transcript abundance or alter the Fgf10 distribution pattern in the VMP or elsewhere in the UGS (Fig. 1B).

FGF10 Induces Prostatic Bud Formation In Vitro and TCDD Interferes with This Action

Since TCDD did not alter Fgf10 transcript abundance in the VMP, a UGS organ culture model was used to determine if TCDD interfered with FGF10-induced bud formation. E14.5 male mouse UGSs were incubated for 3 days in organ culture medium containing the potent androgen, DHT (10nM), and either vehicle alone, recombinant FGF10 protein (300 ng/ml), TCDD (1nM), or a combination of FGF10 and TCDD. At the end of the culture period, UGE was separated from UGM and was visualized by scanning electron microscopy to reveal prostatic buds protruding from the UGE (Fig. 2A). Recombinant FGF10 protein significantly increased mean prostatic bud number compared to vehicle alone, from about 27 buds to 41 buds per UGS (Fig. 2B). TCDD significantly decreased budding compared to vehicle control, from about 27 to 12 buds per UGS. When administered in combination with recombinant FGF10 protein, TCDD prevented FGF10 from inducing prostatic buds. These results suggest that AHR activation by TCDD interferes with FGF10-dependent bud induction.

FIG. 2.
Recombinant FGF10 protein significantly increases prostatic budding in UGS organ culture, and TCDD blocks this effect. UGS from E14.5 male C57BL/6J mouse fetuses were incubated for 3 days in organ culture medium containing vehicle, recombinant FGF10 protein ...

TCDD Does Not Change Fgfr2 Transcript Abundance or Distribution and Does Not Alter FGF10-Induced ERK Activation

Since TCDD interfered with FGF10-inducible prostatic bud formation without changing Fgf10 mRNA abundance, it was hypothesized that TCDD impaired FGF10 signaling by decreasing Fgfr2 abundance. Male mouse fetuses were exposed in utero to vehicle or TCDD (5 μg/kg) on E15.5, and UGS specimens were removed 24 h later, on E16.5. Fgfr2 mRNA abundance was assessed by RT-PCR and was unchanged by TCDD exposure (Fig. 3A), and sectional ISH revealed Fgfr2 mRNA throughout the UGE of vehicle- and TCDD-exposed UGS specimens. TCDD did not appreciably change Fgfr2 abundance or distribution (Fig. 3B).

FIG. 3.
In utero TCDD exposure does not alter Fgfr2 mRNA abundance or distribution in UGE. Male fetal mice were exposed in utero to corn oil (vehicle) or TCDD (5 μg/kg maternal dose) on E15.5. (A) Fgfr2 mRNA abundance was determined by real-time RT-PCR ...

It was shown previously that ligand-bound FGFR2 activates an intracellular signaling cascade involving ERK, which in turn is required for prostatic bud formation (Kuslak and Marker, 2007). We therefore looked downstream of FGFR2 to test the hypothesis that TCDD interferes with ERK activation to inhibit ventral prostatic bud formation. Male mouse fetuses were exposed in utero to vehicle or TCDD (5 μg/kg) on E15.5 and UGS specimens were removed 24 h later, on E16.5, embedded in paraffin and cut in the sagittal plane. ERK activation in ventral UGE was assessed by IHC with an antibody that specifically recognizes the active, phosphorylated forms of ERK 1 and 2 (Fig. 4A). The vast majority of phospho-ERK-positive cells in vehicle-exposed UGS sections were localized to UGE; very few UGM cells expressed phospho-ERK. Phospho-ERK-positive UGE cells were not evenly distributed in UGE, but instead showed a polarized distribution, with the majority of these cells clustered in the urothelial cell compartment, which is the UGE multicell layer lining the sinus space. There were substantially fewer phospho-ERK1/2-positive epithelial cells in the basal UGE cell compartment near the interface with UGM.

FIG. 4.
In utero TCDD exposure significantly decreases ERK activation in UGE cells. Male fetal mice were exposed in utero to corn oil (vehicle) or TCDD (5 μg/kg maternal dose) on E15.5. (A) IHC was used to visualize the pattern of activated phosphorylated ...

Very few phospho-ERK-positive UGE cells were observed following TCDD exposure on E15.5 (Fig. 4A). The mean percentage of phospho-ERK-positive UGE cells within a fixed UGS region from which ventral buds form was quantified in tissue sections from three male fetuses per treatment group. An average of 277 UGE cells per section (three sections per UGS) was examined. TCDD significantly reduced the percentage of phospho-ERK-positive epithelial cells in the ventral UGS region, from 22.6 to 4.4% (Fig. 4B). The cells with the most striking decrease in phospho-ERK expression after TCDD exposure appeared to be urothelial cells near the sinus space.

ERKs are a common intracellular target for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs); they are not activated exclusively by FGFR2 (McKay and Morrison, 2007). A UGS organ culture approach was used to determine if FGF10 was capable of activating ERK in urothelial cells where its activation was reduced by TCDD or if FGF10 activated ERK in a different UGE cell layer. UGS tissue specimens were removed from male fetuses at E15.5, 1 day prior to the start of prostatic bud initiation, and were incubated for 3 days in organ culture medium containing 10nM DHT and vehicle alone, 1nM TCDD, 300 ng/ml recombinant FGF10 protein, or a combination of FGF10 and TCDD. Sagittal sections from cultured UGS were then examined by IHC to visualize the ERK activation pattern (Fig. 5A). There were few phospho-ERK-positive UGE cells in the vehicle control group. FGF10 increased ERK-positive cell number but only in the basal UGE cell layer. Importantly, FGF10 treatment did not appear to activate ERK in urothelial cells where it was inhibited by in utero TCDD exposure. TCDD by itself did not visibly alter ERK activation and did not interfere with ERK activation in basal UGE cells by FGF10. To demonstrate this quantitatively, the mean percentage of phospho-ERK-positive UGE cells within six UGE cell layers from the UGE-UGM interface was quantified in tissue sections from three UGSs per treatment (Fig. 5B). Since UGS tissues were flattened and distorted by the culture process, it was not possible to reliably determine where ventral UGS buds would form. Therefore, basal UGE cells from all prostatic budding regions were examined (an average of 260 UGE cells per section, three sections per UGS). FGF10 significantly increased the percentage of phospho-ERK-positive cells within the six basal UGE multicell layer, from 1.9 to 37.5%, and this increase was not significantly changed by TCDD (Fig. 5B). These results support the hypothesis that TCDD inhibits prostatic bud formation by impairing an FGF10-dependent end point, other than ERK activation, in basal UGE cells.

FIG. 5.
TCDD does not prevent ERK activation by recombinant FGF10 protein in the prostatic budding region of cultured UGS. UGS from E14.5 male C57BL/6J mouse fetuses were incubated for 3 days in organ culture medium containing vehicle, recombinant FGF10 protein ...

TCDD Inhibits FGF10-Induced UGE Cell Proliferation

FGF10 induces mitogenesis in other developing tissues (Bates, 2007; Nie et al., 2006; Sekine et al., 1999) and in the UGS; ERK activation is required for FGF10-induced cell proliferation (Kuslak and Marker, 2007). Since TCDD did not appear to disrupt FGF10-induced ERK activation in the UGS, it was next hypothesized that TCDD may impair FGF10-induced UGE cell proliferation to prevent prostatic buds from forming. UGS tissue specimens were removed from male fetuses at E15.5, 1 day prior to the start of prostatic bud initiation, incubated for 4 h in culture medium containing vehicle or TCDD, and then FGF10 was introduced into the culture medium and UGSs were incubated for an additional 16 h. BrdU was added to the culture medium 12 h after addition of FGF10 and remained in culture media for a total of 4 h to label cells that were in or had completed the S phase of the proliferative cycle. Sections from cultured UGSs were then examined by IHC and the mean percentage of BrdU-positive UGE cells was quantified in tissue sections from three UGSs per treatment. All UGE cells in the prostatic budding regions were examined (an average of 1588 UGE cells per section, three sections per UGS). BrdU-positive cells were observed in UGE and UGM of all treatment groups, reflecting cell proliferation in all treatments during prostatic bud formation (Fig. 6A). FGF10 significantly increased the BrdU-positive UGE cell percentage, from 1.9 to 7.3% (Fig. 6B). TCDD treatment, followed by exposure to vehicle, did not appreciably change the percentage of proliferating UGE cells when compared to UGS tissues cultured in the absence of TCDD or FGF10. However, TCDD pretreatment prevented FGF10-inducible cell proliferation (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that TCDD inhibits prostatic bud formation by interfering with FGF10-inducible basal UGE cell proliferation.

FIG. 6.
TCDD inhibits FGF10-dependent cell proliferation in UGS organ culture. UGS from E15.5 male C57BL/6J mouse fetuses were incubated for 4 h in organ culture medium containing vehicle or 1nM TCDD. Vehicle or 300 ng/ml recombinant FGF10 protein was then added ...

DISCUSSION

We previously showed that fetal and neonatal TCDD exposure inhibited mouse prostatic budding and permanently reduced prostate size and duct number (Ko et al., 2002; Lin et al., 2003). We demonstrated that prostatic buds are most vulnerable to inhibition by TCDD during their specification and prior to prostatic bud initiation (Vezina et al., 2008b). This led us to hypothesize that TCDD impairs prostatic budding by disrupting developmental patterning signals during prostatic bud specification. Organogenesis is generally regulated by morphogenetic signals distributed in specific patterns about craniocaudal, dorsoventral, and mediolateral axes (Meinhardt, 2008). TCDD appears to interfere with signals along the dorsoventral axis, yielding a dorsalized prostatic UGS where buds are inappropriately clustered on the dorsal surface, reduced in number on the lateral surface, and absent from the ventral surface (Lin et al., 2003; Vezina et al., 2008b).

In the present study, we provide evidence that TCDD prevents FGF10-induced prostatic bud formation and cell proliferation. FGF10 signaling has been implicated in the fetal basis of adult prostate disease (Huang et al., 2005) and is active in prostate cancer (Memarzadeh et al., 2007). TCDD inhibited FGF10-induced UGE cell proliferation and prostatic bud formation without altering UGS abundance or regional distribution of Fgf10-, Fgfr2-, or FGF10-induced ERK activation. It therefore appears that TCDD acts downstream of Fgfr2, and likely also downstream of ERK, to impair prostatic budding. A region-specific inhibition of Fgf10-induced budding by TCDD may in part be responsible for dorsalizing the prostatic bud pattern in fetal male mice.

AHR activation by TCDD during fetal mouse development appears to cause latent adverse affects on prostate biology that permanently reprogram the prostate and increase disease susceptibly in adulthood. In utero and lactational TCDD exposure caused male mice to inappropriately retain a high degree of prostate androgen dependence and increased the frequency of hyperplastic prostate growth lesions when these animals reached senescence (Fritz et al., 2005). In utero and lactational TCDD exposure also increases neuroendocrine prostate tumor incidence in 140-day-old TRAMP mice (Lin et al., 2009). It is imperative to understand mechanisms of TCDD action in the fetal UGS because of this growth period’s relevance to prostate health.

To understand how TCDD inhibits FGF10-induced prostatic budding, it is necessary to understand how budding is induced by FGF10. However, there is little evidence for how this occurs. In postnatal rat prostate, FGF10 activates sonic hedgehog and homeobox b13 transcription to regulate ductal branching morphogenesis (Pu et al., 2007) but it is unclear whether FGF10 serves the same function during prenatal prostatic bud formation. To further understand the mechanism by which FGF10 signaling is reduced by TCDD during prostatic budding, the FGF10 signaling pathway must be resolved in greater detail, specifically the downstream events leading to FGF10-dependent UGE cell proliferation must be identified. Kuslak and Marker (2007) reported that FGF10 activates ERK in mouse UGS and that this event is required for FGF10-induced cell proliferation. Our results build upon this observation by revealing that ERK is induced selectively by FGF10 in basal UGE cells, which is also where FGF10 most strongly induced cell proliferation in UGS organ culture. With this new knowledge of basal UGE cells being a target of FGF10 signaling, it will now be possible to elucidate, in future studies, downstream signals mediated by FGF10 in this UGE multicell layer. There are already some candidate factors that may be mediating FGF10 signaling targets in these cells. The ERK activation pattern by FGF10 in UGE cells is similar to that described previously for other proteins required for prostate development, including SOX9 (Thomsen et al., 2008), FOXA2 (Mirosevich et al., 2005), and transformation-related protein 63 (Cook et al., 2007). SOX9, which is required for the normal FGFR2 expression pattern in UGS (Thomsen et al., 2008), appears to be upstream of FGF10 signaling but the relationships between FGFR2, P63, and FOXA2 remain unknown.

An unexpected finding in this study was that TCDD inhibited ERK activation in urothelial cells, which do not appear to be highly FGF10 responsive at the gestational age that our study was conducted. TCDD was reported previously to induce AHR-responsive Cyp1a1 mRNA expression in urothelial cells (Vezina et al., 2008b), and although this cell population does not play a known role in prostatic bud formation, it is a direct target for TCDD action. Intracellular signals from multiple RTKs converge on the map kinase signaling pathway to elicit intracellular responses (McKay and Morrison, 2007). TCDD may inhibit one of these receptor-mediated signals, thereby decreasing ERK activation in urothelial cells. Epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor (TGF) α are expressed in fetal male rat UGS (Saito and Mizuno, 1995), both activate ERK in prostate (Hagan et al., 2004; Putz et al., 1999), and both appear to regulate prostatic bud formation in the mouse (Abbott et al., 2003). Additional RTKs or their ligands have been identified in fetal male UGS, including TGFβ (Timme et al., 1994), colony-stimulating factor receptor (Paine-Saunders et al., 2002), and keratinocyte growth factor (Gao et al., 2005), but the activation pattern of these RTKs is unknown. Future studies will determine if these factors activate ERK in developing urothelial cells and investigate whether TCDD-induced ERK inhibition in urothelial cells influences their ability to differentiate.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health (R37 ES01332 and P50 DK065303 to R.E.P., F32 ES014284 and K01 DK083425 to C.M.V., F31 HD049323 to S.H.A.).

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Ralph Albrecht for assistance with scanning electron microscopic imaging.

References

  • Abbott BD, Lin TM, Rasmussen NT, Albrecht RM, Schmid JE, Peterson RE. Lack of expression of EGF and TGF-alpha in the fetal mouse alters formation of prostatic epithelial buds and influences the response to TCDD. Toxicol. Sci. 2003;76:427–436. [PubMed]
  • Allgeier SH, Lin TM, Vezina CM, Moore RW, Fritz WA, Chiu SY, Zhang C, Peterson RE. WNT5A selectively inhibits mouse ventral prostate development. Dev. Biol. 2008;324:10–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bates CM. Role of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling in kidney development. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2007;22:343–349. [PubMed]
  • Bellusci S, Grindley J, Emoto H, Itoh N, Hogan BL. Fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) and branching morphogenesis in the embryonic mouse lung. Development. 1997;124:4867–4878. [PubMed]
  • Cook C, Vezina CM, Allgeier SH, Shaw A, Yu M, Peterson RE, Bushman W. Noggin is required for normal lobe patterning and ductal budding in the mouse prostate. Dev. Biol. 2007;312:217–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cunha GR, Chung LW. Stromal-epithelial interactions–I. Induction of prostatic phenotype in urothelium of testicular feminized (Tfm/y) mice. J. Steroid Biochem. 1981;14:1317–1324. [PubMed]
  • Cunha GR, Lung B. The possible influence of temporal factors in androgenic responsiveness of urogenital tissue recombinants from wild-type and androgen-insensitive (Tfm) mice. J. Exp. Zool. 1978;205:181–193. [PubMed]
  • Donjacour AA, Thomson AA, Cunha GR. FGF-10 plays an essential role in the growth of the fetal prostate. Dev. Biol. 2003;261:39–54. [PubMed]
  • Fritz WA, Lin TM, Moore RW, Cooke PS, Peterson RE. In utero and lactational 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin exposure: effects on the prostate and its response to castration in senescent C57BL/6J mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2005;86:387–395. [PubMed]
  • Gao N, Ishii K, Mirosevich J, Kuwajima S, Oppenheimer SR, Roberts RL, Jiang M, Yu X, Shappell SB, Caprioli RM, et al. Forkhead box A1 regulates prostate ductal morphogenesis and promotes epithelial cell maturation. Development. 2005;132:3431–3443. [PubMed]
  • Hagan M, Yacoub A, Dent P. Ionizing radiation causes a dose-dependent release of transforming growth factor alpha in vitro from irradiated xenografts and during palliative treatment of hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:5724–5731. [PubMed]
  • Howard B, Ashworth A. Signalling pathways implicated in early mammary gland morphogenesis and breast cancer. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e112. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Huang L, Pu Y, Alam S, Birch L, Prins GS. The role of Fgf10 signaling in branching morphogenesis and gene expression of the rat prostate gland: lobe-specific suppression by neonatal estrogens. Dev. Biol. 2005;278:396–414. [PubMed]
  • Isaac A, Cohn MJ, Ashby P, Ataliotis P, Spicer DB, Cooke J, Tickle C. FGF and genes encoding transcription factors in early limb specification. Mech. Dev. 2000;93:41–48. [PubMed]
  • Ko K, Moore RW, Peterson RE. Aryl hydrocarbon receptors in urogenital sinus mesenchyme mediate the inhibition of prostatic epithelial bud formation by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004a;196:149–155. [PubMed]
  • Ko K, Theobald HM, Moore RW, Peterson RE. Evidence that inhibited prostatic epithelial bud formation in 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-exposed C57BL/6J fetal mice is not due to interruption of androgen signaling in the urogenital sinus. Toxicol. Sci. 2004b;79:360–369. [PubMed]
  • Ko K, Theobald HM, Peterson RE. In utero and lactational exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the C57BL/6J mouse prostate: lobe-specific effects on branching morphogenesis. Toxicol. Sci. 2002;70:227–237. [PubMed]
  • Kuslak SL, Marker PC. Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling through MEK-ERK is required for prostate bud induction. Differentiation. 2007;75:638–651. [PubMed]
  • Lin T-M, Fritz WA, Safe S, Peterson RE. TCDD and the selective aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) modulators indole-3-carbinol (I3C) and 3,3′-diindolylmethane (DIM) regulate prostate tumorigenesis in TRAMP mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2009;108:626.
  • Lin TM, Rasmussen NT, Moore RW, Albrecht RM, Peterson RE. Region-specific inhibition of prostatic epithelial bud formation in the urogenital sinus of C57BL/6 mice exposed in utero to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol. Sci. 2003;76:171–181. [PubMed]
  • Lin Y, Liu G, Zhang Y, Hu YP, Yu K, Lin C, McKeehan K, Xuan JW, Ornitz DM, Shen MM, et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 tyrosine kinase is required for prostatic morphogenesis and the acquisition of strict androgen dependency for adult tissue homeostasis. Development. 2007;134:723–734. [PubMed]
  • McKay MM, Morrison DK. Integrating signals from RTKs to ERK/MAPK. Oncogene. 2007;26:3113–3121. [PubMed]
  • Meinhardt H. Models of biological pattern formation: from elementary steps to the organization of embryonic axes. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2008;81:1–63. [PubMed]
  • Memarzadeh S, Xin L, Mulholland DJ, Mansukhani A, Wu H, Teitell MA, Witte ON. Enhanced paracrine FGF10 expression promotes formation of multifocal prostate adenocarcinoma and an increase in epithelial androgen receptor. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:572–585. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Miki T, Bottaro DP, Fleming TP, Smith CL, Burgess WH, Chan AM, Aaronson SA. Determination of ligand-binding specificity by alternative splicing: two distinct growth factor receptors encoded by a single gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992;89:246–250. [PubMed]
  • Min H, Danilenko DM, Scully SA, Bolon B, Ring BD, Tarpley JE, DeRose M, Simonet WS. Fgf-10 is required for both limb and lung development and exhibits striking functional similarity to Drosophila branchless. Genes Dev. 1998;12:3156–3161. [PubMed]
  • Mirosevich J, Gao N, Matusik RJ. Expression of Foxa transcription factors in the developing and adult murine prostate. Prostate. 2005;62:339–352. [PubMed]
  • Nie X, Luukko K, Kettunen P. FGF signalling in craniofacial development and developmental disorders. Oral Dis. 2006;12:102–111. [PubMed]
  • Nyeng P, Norgaard GA, Kobberup S, Jensen J. FGF10 signaling controls stomach morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2007;303:295–310. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Paine-Saunders S, Viviano BL, Economides AN, Saunders S. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans retain Noggin at the cell surface: a potential mechanism for shaping bone morphogenetic protein gradients. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:2089–2096. [PubMed]
  • Pu Y, Huang L, Birch L, Prins GS. Androgen regulation of prostate morphoregulatory gene expression: Fgf10-dependent and -independent pathways. Endocrinology. 2007;148:1697–1706. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Putz T, Culig Z, Eder IE, Nessler-Menardi C, Bartsch G, Grunicke H, Uberall F, Klocker H. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor blockade inhibits the action of EGF, insulin-like growth factor I, and a protein kinase A activator on the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in prostate cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 1999;59:227–233. [PubMed]
  • Saito M, Mizuno T. Le facteur de croissance de l'epiderme (EGF) peut induire des bourgeons prostatiques en l'absence d'androgenes. [Epidermal growth factor (EGF) can induce prostatic buds in the absence of androgens] C.R. Seances Soc. Biol. Fil. 1995;189:637–641. [PubMed]
  • Sekine K, Ohuchi H, Fujiwara M, Yamasaki M, Yoshizawa T, Sato T, Yagishita N, Matsui D, Koga Y, Itoh N, et al. Fgf10 is essential for limb and lung formation. Nat. Genet. 1999;21:138–141. [PubMed]
  • Sugimura Y, Cunha GR, Donjacour AA. Morphogenesis of ductal networks in the mouse prostate. Biol. Reprod. 1986;34:961–971. [PubMed]
  • Thomsen MK, Butler CM, Shen MM, Swain A. Sox9 is required for prostate development. Dev. Biol. 2008;316:302–311. [PubMed]
  • Thomson AA, Cunha GR. Prostatic growth and development are regulated by FGF10. Development. 1999;126:3693–3701. [PubMed]
  • Timme TL, Truong LD, Merz VW, Krebs T, Kadmon D, Flanders KC, Park SH, Thompson TC. Mesenchymal-epithelial interactions and transforming growth factor-beta expression during mouse prostate morphogenesis. Endocrinology. 1994;134:1039–1045. [PubMed]
  • Timms BG, Lee CW, Aumuller G, Seitz J. Instructive induction of prostate growth and differentiation by a defined urogenital sinus mesenchyme. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1995;30:319–332. [PubMed]
  • Timms BG, Mohs TJ, Didio LJ. Ductal budding and branching patterns in the developing prostate. J. Urol. 1994;151:1427–1432. [PubMed]
  • Vezina CM, Allgeier SH, Fritz WA, Moore RW, Strerath M, Bushman W, Peterson RE. Retinoic acid induces prostatic bud formation. Dev. Dyn. 2008a;237:1321–1333. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vezina CM, Allgeier SH, Moore RW, Lin TM, Bemis JC, Hardin HA, Gasiewicz TA, Peterson RE. Dioxin causes ventral prostate agenesis by disrupting dorsoventral patterning in developing mouse prostate. Toxicol. Sci. 2008b;106:488–496. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Toxicological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press