PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of capmcAbout manuscripts / A propos des manuscritsSubmit manuscript / soumettre un manuscrit
 
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 August 10.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2791893
NIHMSID: NIHMS155997
CAMSID: CAMS1333

Utility and relationships of biomarkers of smoking in African-American light smokers

Abstract

While expired carbon monoxide (CO) and plasma cotinine (COT) have been validated as biomarkers of self-reported cigarettes per day (CPD) in heavy smoking Caucasians, their utility in light smokers is unknown. Further, variability in CYP2A6, the enzyme that mediates formation of COT from nicotine (NIC) and its metabolism to trans-3′-hydroxycotinine (3HC), may limit the usefulness of COT. We assessed whether CO and COT are correlated with CPD in African-American light smokers (≤10CPD, n=700), a population with known reduced CYP2A6 activity and slow COT metabolism. We also examined whether gender, age, BMI, smoking mentholated cigarettes or rate of CYP2A6 activity, by genotype and phenotype measures (3HC/COT), influence these relationships. At baseline, many participants (42%) exhaled CO ≤10ppm, the traditional cutoff for smoking, while few (3.1%) had COT below the cutoff of ≤14ng/ml; thus COT appears to be a better biomarker of smoking status in this population. CPD was weakly correlated with CO and COT (r = 0.32–0.39, p<0.001), and those reporting fewer CPD had higher CO/cigarette and COT/cigarette, although the correlations coefficients between these variables were also weak (r = −0.33 and −0.08, p < 0.05). The correlation between CPD and CO was not greatly increased when analyzed by CYP2A6 activity, smoking mentholated cigarettes or age, although it appeared stronger in females (r = 0.38 vs.0.21, p<0.05) and obese individuals (r = 0.38 vs.0.24, p<0.05). Together, these results suggest that CO and COT are weakly associated with self-reported cigarette consumption in African-American light smokers, and that these relationships are not substantially improved when variables previously reported to influence these biomarkers are considered.

Keywords: biomarkers, smoking, cotinine, carbon monoxide, African-Americans

Introduction

Biomarkers of cigarette smoke exposure have been utilized to confirm self-reported smoking measurements. Two commonly used measures are cotinine (COT) and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO). COT, a metabolite of nicotine (NIC), is detected in a number of biological fluids (i.e. plasma, saliva and urine) and is highly specific to NIC exposure (1). However, COT is not specific to cigarette smoke as individuals exposed to alternative sources of tobacco or nicotine replacement therapy will also have detectable COT (1). The traditional cut-off value for differentiating smokers from non-smokers is plasma or salivary COT levels of ≤14 ng/ml (1, 2). COT has a relatively long half-life (13 – 19 hrs) and reflects exposure to tobacco within the past 3 – 4 days (1, 3). CO is a byproduct of the combustion of tobacco, and a cutoff value for CO of ≤ 10 ppm is traditionally used to distinguish smokers from non-smokers (1, 4). However, CO is not specific to tobacco smoke exposure and contributions from environmental sources (such as vehicle exhaust) and endogenous formation of CO from heme catabolism can limit its use (4). CO has a short half-life of approximately 1 – 4 hours (4) and reflects more recent exposure to smoking; it is highly dependent on the time of the last cigarette.

Several prior studies have confirmed the utility of both COT and CO levels to verify self-reported cigarette consumption, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.3 – 0.8 (47). However, these studies have been performed primarily among Caucasian moderate to heavy smokers. It is unknown whether these biomarkers are representative of cigarette consumption among light smokers where smoking levels are lower and occur at irregular intervals. In particular, the short half-life of CO, and its lack of specificity, may make it difficult to differentiate light smoking from non-smoking. While the longer half-life of COT may make it a suitable marker among light smokers, it may be influenced by variable rates of its metabolism.

COT is the main proximate metabolite of nicotine (NIC) (8), and COT itself is further metabolized to trans-3′-hydroxycotinine (3HC) (9, 10). The conversion of NIC to COT, and COT to 3HC, are primarily mediated by the enzyme cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6) (11). Large interindividual variability in CYP2A6 activity has been reported (12). The gene encoding CYP2A6 is highly polymorphic, with 38 numbered alleles identified so far*. To aid in population studies, the 3HC/COT ratio (which can be measured in plasma, saliva or urine), has been validated as a phenotype indicator of CYP2A6 activity (10). COT levels are potentially influenced by a number of factors that alter CYP2A6 activity, including genetic variation, the presence of enzyme inducers or inhibitors, body mass index (BMI), age, and gender. For instance, African-Americans have higher COT plasma levels than Caucasian smokers even after controlling for number of cigarettes smoked (13). This can be partly attributed to their slower rates of COT metabolism (14); approximately 50% of African-Americans have decrease- or loss-of-function CYP2A6 genetic variants compared to approximately 20% of Caucasians (12, 15). Furthermore, a large proportion of African-Americans smoke mentholated cigarettes, and it has been suggested that the cooling sensation may result in deeper, longer inhalation and larger puff volumes (16). Some studies, but not all, have found higher CO and COT levels among mentholated cigarette users (16). There is also evidence menthol can inhibit CYP2A6 in vitro and mentholated cigarette smokers have slower rates of NIC metabolism (17, 18). Individuals with higher BMI have been found to have lower COT levels (5, 19), and older age has been associated with higher levels of COT (20, 21). Females are known to have faster rates of NIC and COT metabolism (22), with estrogen being an inducer of CYP2A6 (23).

In this study, we examined whether biomarkers derived from ad libitum smoking are associated with self-reported cigarette consumption in a population of African-American light smokers, a population with unique smoking characteristics. The need for validated biomarkers for this specific population are warranted as the prevalence of light smoking is particularly common among African-Americans, with up to 50% reporting ≤ 10 CPD compared to 18–20% of the general smoking population (24). We also examined whether variables previously known to affect biomarker levels, such as rate of CYP2A6 activity (by genotype and 3HC/COT phenotype measure), gender, smoking mentholated cigarettes, BMI or age influenced these relationships. While CYP2A6 genotype was not found to substantially influence the relationships between biomarkers and cigarette consumption in a previous study of Caucasian heavy smokers (25), the proportion of individuals with CYP2A6 genetic variants was low. It is possible that the high prevalence of CYP2A6 decrease- or loss-of function genetic variants and slower rates of COT metabolism among African-Americans may play a greater role in this population.”

Materials and Methods

Study design

A detailed description of the study design and participant recruitment can be found elsewhere (15, 26). Briefly, participants (n = 755) were randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled smoking cessation study at a community health centre in Kansas City, Missouri. Participants (≥18 years of age) self-identified as “African-American” or “Black”, smoked ≤10 CPD for at least 6 months prior to enrollment, and smoked at least 25 of the past 30 days were recruited. The research protocol was approved by the University of Toronto Ethics Review Office and the University of Kansas Human Subjects Committee.

Baseline assessment

Information regarding the participant’s demographic, smoking and psychosocial characteristics have been described in detail elsewhere (27). Age, gender, and BMI were collected at randomization. Participants were asked about their smoking patterns, including the number of CPD, mentholated vs. non-mentholated cigarette use, depth of inhalation, and number of years smoked. Participants were asked to estimate their cigarette consumption by the question: “During the past 7 days, on those days that you smoked, what was the average number of cigarettes smoked per day?” Although all of the participants recruited into the clinical trial reported smoking ≤ 10 CPD on the eligibility questionnaire, a small subset of participants reported consuming zero or > 10 CPD during the past week during the randomization assessment (n = 55) and thus were excluded from analyses in the current study.

Biochemical measures

A blood sample was collected at randomization to determine the levels of NIC and its metabolites, and for genotyping purposes. Plasma levels of NIC, COT and 3HC were determined using the methods described elsewhere (10), although 3HC levels were only available for a subset of the participants (n = 602 out of 700). Expired CO levels were measured by a handheld portable CO monitor (Bedfont Micro Smokerlyzer, Kent, England).

CYP2A6 genotyping

CYP2A6 genotyping for this population was performed using two-step allele-specific polymerase chain reaction assays as described previously (15). A subset of the total participants consented to have their blood sampled for genetic analyses, and genotyping data was available for 570 of the 700 participants. Participants were genotyped for CYP2A6*1B, *2, *4, *9, *12, *17, *20, *23, *24, *25, *26, *27, *28, and *35 (15). Individuals were categorized into groups based on their predicted effects of their CYP2A6 genotypes on rates of activity as previously described (15). Those with one copy of the decrease-of-function alleles (CYP2A6*9 and *12) were grouped as intermediate metabolizers (n = 70). Individuals with two copies of the decrease-of-function alleles, one or two copies of loss-of-function alleles (CYP2A6*2, *4, *17, *20, *23, *24, *25, *26, *27 and *35), or one decrease-of-function allele with one loss-of-function allele were grouped as slow metabolizers (n = 197). Normal metabolizers (n = 275) were individuals without these genetic variants. Those with CYP2A6*1B (n = 89) were also included in the normal metabolizer group as previously described(15). Individuals with CYP2A6*28 (n = 28)were excluded from analyses due to extreme range in 3HC/COT values, suggesting some may also have gain-of-function copy number variants which is currently under investigation.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software, version 16.0. The data (CPD, CO, NIC, COT, 3HC, 3HC/COT, BMI) were not normally distributed according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and were log-transformed when appropriate. Pearsons’s correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationships between log-transformed CPD, CO, and COT with CO/cigarette, COT/cigarette. Differences in log-transformed CPD, CO or COT between gender, use of mentholated cigarettes, and BMI as categorized by those considered obese (BMI ≥30) versus non-obese (BMI < 30), were tested using the t-test for independent samples. Differences in CPD, CO or COT between CYP2A6 genotype groups, 3HC/COT quartiles, and age categories were examined using univariate analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for post hoc analyses. Pearson’s correlations between log-transformed CPD, CO or COT with age and log-transformed 3HC/COT and BMI as continuous variables were also examined. Differences between Pearson’s correlation coefficients were tested using the Fisher r-to-z transformation. A multiple linear regression model was used to examine the predictors of baseline CPD, CO and COT. Variables included in the model were significant in univariate analyses (p < 0.10), and variables that were not normally distributed (CPD, CO, COT, BMI, 3HC/COT) were log-transformed in the analyses.

Results

Participant demographics

A summary of the participant demographics, smoking history and biochemical measures can be found in Table 1. The study sample was overrepresented by females (66.7%), and the majority smoked menthol cigarettes (81.3%). A histogram of the CPD, expired CO and plasma COT from baseline smoking is found in Fig. 1A–C. Many participants (42%, n = 294) had expired CO values of ≤10 ppm, the traditional cutoff for differentiating between smokers from non-smokers. In contrast, few individuals had plasma COT levels below the widely used cutoff value of 14 ng/ml (3.1%, n = 22) (1, 3), or below the cutoff of 20 ng/ml used to verify smoking abstinence in this clinical trial (3.9%, n = 27) (26).

Fig 1
(A – C). Histogram of self-reported CPD and the biomarkers expired CO and plasma COT for study participants (n = 700). Cutoff values of expired CO at ≤10 ppm and plasma COT levels of ≤14 ng/ml have been traditionally used to differentiate ...
Table 1
Participant characteristics

Relationship between expired CO, plasma COT and CPD

CPD was significantly, albeit weakly, correlated with expired CO (Pearson’s r = 0.32, p < 0.001) and with plasma COT (Pearson’s r = 0.39, p < 0.001) (fig 1D, E). Expired CO and plasma COT were also significantly correlated with each other (Pearson’s r = 0.60, p < 0.001) (fig 1F). We examined the ratio of expired CO or plasma COT to self-reported values of cigarettes smoked as indicators of the extent of inhalation. CPD was poorly correlated with CO/cigarette (Pearson’s r = −0.33, p < 0.001, fig 1G) and COT/cigarette (Pearson’s r = −0.08, p < 0.05, fig 1H).

Variables that influence CPD, expired CO and plasma COT

CYP2A6 slow metabolizers, as defined by genotype, had significantly higher plasma COT levels compared to normal metabolizers (p < 0.01), although CYP2A6 genotype was not associated with CPD or expired CO levels (Table 2, Fig. 2A–C). Similarly, individuals with 3HC/COT ratios in quartile 1, representing those with slowest rate of CYP2A6 activity, also had significantly higher plasma COT levels compared to those in quartiles 2 – 4 (p < 0.001), although the 3HC/COT ratio was not significantly associated with either CPD or expired CO (Table 2, Fig. 2D–F). CYP2A6 slow metabolizers by genotype were also found to have significantly higher plasma NIC (p < 0.001) and 3HC levels (p < 0.001), and those in the slowest 3HC/COT quartile had significantly higher plasma NIC and 3HC levels compared to those with the fastest metabolic activity (p < 0.001).

Fig 2
Relationship between CYP2A6 activity, CPD, expired CO, and plasma COT. Self-reported CPD and expired CO did not differ by CYP2A6 genotype (A, B) or 3HC/COT quartiles (D, E), while CYP2A6 slow metabolizers had significantly higher plasma COT levels compared ...
Table 2
Variables that influences CPD, expired CO or plasma COT levels

No gender difference was found for CPD or expired CO, though females trended towards higher plasma COT levels (p = 0.09, Table 2). Those who smoked mentholated cigarettes trended towards reporting fewer CPD compared to those who did not (p = 0.05), although no difference was found for expired CO or plasma COT levels between mentholated and non-mentholated cigarette smokers. Obese individuals (BMI ≥30) smoked fewer cigarettes (p < 0.05) and had lower levels of expired CO (p < 0.05) and COT (p < 0.001). BMI was not significantly correlated with CPD, but a negative correlation was found between BMI and expired CO (p < 0.01), and between BMI and plasma COT (p < 0.001). CPD, expired CO and plasma COT were not significantly associated with age, either by correlation analyses or when examined categorically. We did not find significant differences in CPD, expired CO or plasma COT by self-reported inhalation patterns or the presence of other smokers in the home (Table 2).

Variables that influence relationships between CPD and expired CO with NIC and its metabolites

The correlation coefficients between CPD and expired CO with plasma NIC and its metabolites were not greatly altered by CYP2A6 genotype or 3HC/COT quartiles (Table 3). Similarly, these relationships were generally not altered when analyzed separately by gender, mentholated cigarettes, BMI or age. However, it is notable that the correlation between CPD and expired CO was stronger in females compared to males (Pearson’s r = 0.38 vs. 0.21, respectively, p < 0.05) and in obese (BMI ≥ 30) compared to non-obese individuals (Pearson’s r = 0.38 vs. 0.24, respectively, p < 0.05). No difference was observed for the correlations between CPD and plasma COT was observed by gender or BMI.

Table 3
Correlations (r) between biomarkers and cigarette consumption by variables

In a multiple regression model including the predictors of CPD that were significant in univariate analyses (p < 0.10), plasma COT (β = 0.31) and expired CO (β = 0.13) remained significant (p < 0.01) while age and BMI were no longer significant, and the trend of mentholated cigarettes use associating with fewer CPD remained (Table 4). Together, these predictors accounted for 17% of the variance in CPD.

Table 4
Multiple linear regression models of the predictors of CPD, expired CO and plasma COT

Discussion

In this population of African-American light smokers, where approximately one-third consume ≤5 CPD, two commonly used biomarkers of cigarette smoke exposure, expired CO and plasma COT, were significantly correlated with self-reported CPD. However, the strength of the correlations were relatively weak (r ~ 0.31 – 0.37), and in a multiple regression model, only ~17% of the variance in CPD was explained by plasma COT and expired CO. This is in contrast to heavy smoking Caucasian populations, where correlation coefficients from 0.3 – 0.8 have been reported (47). Self-reported number of cigarettes smoked per day is a limited indicator of exposure as there is a nonlinear relationship between biomarkers and CPD, with a plateau observed at higher levels of consumption (>20 – 25 CPD) (28). Heavy smokers reporting consumption at these levels appear to smoke each cigarette with less intensity (25, 28). Thus, self-reported measures of CPD may not be representative of exposure particularly at extremely high or low levels of smoking.

It would have been ideal to compare our findings with a matched group of Caucasian light smokers from a clinical trial (e.g. treatment seekers) to determine whether the weaker correlations between the biomarkers and self-reported cigarette consumption in this study were reflective of variables that were specific to African-Americans, or resulted from the narrow range in cigarettes consumed. However, established light smoking patterns among adults is less common among Caucasians, and the clinical trial from which participants in the current study was drawn is the only published one to date to have recruited specifically light smokers (≤10 CPD) (29). To partially address this issue, we analyzed a subset of Caucasian smokers that reported ≤ 10 CPD in our previously published biomarkers paper (25). Despite the considerably smaller numbers in this subset analyses (N = 40 vs. 152) the correlation coefficients appeared higher in the Caucasian light smokers. Specifically, the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between CO with CPD (r = 0.37, p = 0.02) was similar, while the correlations between COT with CPD (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), and CO with COT (r = 0.77, p < 0.001) were stronger than in African American light smokers (r = 0.32, 0.39 and 0.60 respectively, Fig 1). The correlations between CO and CPD were improved when the total sample of Caucasians in that study (n = 152, mean CPD = 19.4) (25) was examined (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), although the relationships between COT and CPD (r = 0.53, p < 0.001) and CO with COT (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) remained similar. Thus, it appears that COT may be a poorer biomarker of cigarette consumption in African-American light smokers compared to Caucasians, and as expected CO appears poorly correlated with CPD in all light smokers. Furthermore, in a subset of heavy-smoking, treatment-seeking African-Americans, in which these variables were available, recruited for a clinical trial testing the efficacy of bupropion (n = 93) (30), both CO and COT were poorly correlated with self-reported cigarette consumption (r = 0.20, p = 0.05 for CO with CPD, and r = 0.05, p = 0.62 for COT with CPD). Together this suggests that CO is a poor correlate of cigarette consumption in light smokers in general, while COT is a poor correlate of cigarette consumption among African-American smokers.

Traditional cutoff levels of expired CO and plasma COT for differentiating between smokers and nonsmokers have previously been determined primarily in heavy smoking Caucasian populations (2, 31). Our results suggest that using expired CO ≤ 10 ppm to verify smoking status in light smokers may result in misclassification of smokers as nonsmokers, as ~40% of our treatment-seeking sample of smokers had expired CO levels below this limit. In contrast, very few individuals (3.1%) had plasma COT levels below the traditional cutoff of 14 ng/ml. This cutoff value was determined more than 20 years ago when there were high levels of secondhand smoke (2). Recently, it was suggested that the plasma COT cutoff should be further reduced to 3 ng/ml, with optimal cutoff revised to 6 ng/ml for African-Americans (32). This revised cutoff of 6 ng/ml would misclassify only 2.5% of smokers as nonsmokers in this sample. While further studies will be needed to precisely determine the optimal cutoff points for expired CO and plasma COT among African-American light smokers, our study suggests plasma COT may be a better indicator of smoking status than expired CO.

The second objective of this study was to determine whether other variables (i.e. CYP2A6 activity, gender, age, BMI, smoking mentholated cigarettes) influence biomarkers levels (expired CO, plasma COT) or their relationships to self-reported CPD. Individuals with slow CYP2A6 activity, as indicated by genotype and 3HC/COT, had significantly higher plasma COT levels despite similar intake as represented by self-reported CPD and expired CO values. COT clearance rates were previously found to be reduced by ~35% in individuals with CYP2A6 genetic variants (33), and in this study, COT levels are ~20 – 30% higher in individuals with slow CYP2A6 activity. Despite its substantial effect on COT levels however, CYP2A6 activity did not greatly alter the correlations between NIC or its metabolites with self-reported CPD or expired CO levels, similar to what was observed in our previous study of Caucasian heavy smokers (25).

Individuals with higher BMI were found to have significantly lower plasma COT levels (r = −0.19), as well as lower NIC (r = −0.16) and 3HC (r = −0.26) in this study. A negative correlation between BMI and COT levels has been previously reported (r = −0.16 to −0.36) (5, 19). It is possible that differences in BMI may result in altered volumes of distribution for NIC and its metabolites, thus resulting in altered plasma levels. The volume of distribution for NIC and COT have been correlated with total body weight and lean body mass (r = 0.23 – 0.67), although no significant correlation was found between the volume of distribution with adipose mass (14). BMI has also been negatively associated with the 3HC/COT ratio (15, 34, 35), suggesting obesity and rate of CYP2A6 activity may be related, although this has not been examined explicitly. While the lower plasma COT levels in individuals with higher BMI may also be interpreted as lower exposure to cigarette smoke, this is unlikely as BMI was not significantly associated with expired CO or CPD in multiple regression analyses. As such, it is yet unclear whether the relationship between BMI and COT represents altered rates of COT metabolism (altered CYP2A6 activity), or volume of distribution, or a combination of both. Interestingly, expired CO appeared to be a better measure of exposure in obese individuals (BMI ≥30.0) as the correlation to CPD appeared stronger in these individuals.

It has been proposed that the cooling sensation associated with smoking mentholated cigarettes allows for increased smoke intake. Thus, this may contribute to the higher COT levels and disproportionately higher incidences of tobacco-related illnesses among African-Americans, who because of the influence of marketing campaigns in the 1960s, predominantly smoke mentholated cigarettes (36). However, while some cross-sectional and experimental studies have found higher CO and COT levels among mentholated cigarette smokers, this has not been consistently replicated (16). Studies finding an effect were generally of small sample size, and included both heavy-smoking Caucasians and African-Americans. In this current study of African-American light smokers, mentholated cigarette users did not have significantly higher expired CO or plasma COT levels despite our large sample, with 131 non-menthol smokers examined. Thus, cigarette mentholation did not appear to contribute to increased intensity of cigarette smoking or increased absorption of nicotine in our sample of African-American light smokers.

No differences in CPD, expired CO or plasma COT were found by age, in contrast to previous findings where older individuals had higher COT levels (20, 21). In general, drug metabolism is thought to decrease by age (37), and while NIC clearance rates are reduced in the elderly (age >65), this has been attributed to age-related changes in hepatic blood flow as no differences in CYP2A6 protein by age have been observed (38). The renal clearance of COT is also reduced in the elderly, although pharmacokinetic parameters such as area-under-the-curve and elimination half-lives are not altered (39). Accordingly, the relationships between NIC or its metabolites with CPD or expired CO did not greatly differ among mentholated cigarettes users or by age.

We did not find any gender differences in CPD, expired CO, or plasma COT. However, in the present study the proportion of variance in CPD explained by expired CO was more than tripled in females compared to males (14.4% vs. 4.4%, respectively). This was unlikely due to differences in the type of cigarettes smoked, as there was no difference in prevalence of mentholated cigarettes use by gender. A number of studies have reported gender differences in smoking topography, with males taking larger and longer puffs compared to females (4042). However, we did not observe any differences in CO/cigarette or COT/cigarette by gender in this population (p > 0.10). Among African-American light smoking males, there may be more variability in the manner in which cigarettes are smoked, resulting in weaker relationships between self-reported CPD and expired CO.

One limitation of our study is that this was secondary analyses performed on participants that were originally recruited for a clinical trial on smoking cessation, and may not be representative of African-American light smokers in the general population. Thus, biochemical measures were collected randomly from ad libitum smoking and the time of the last cigarette may have been a significant source of variation, particularly for expired CO where the half-life is short. It is possible that this treatment-seeking sample may have attempted to stop smoking prior to the start of the trial; however, we excluded from these analyses any participants that reported smoking zero cigarettes within the past seven days prior to the collection of biochemical data. That said, we cannot exclude the possibility that there may have been a selection bias as participants were light smokers who were highly motivated to quit smoking and had difficulty quitting in the past. Thus, they may be more dependent or smoke cigarettes differently from other non-treatment seeking light smokers. In addition, participants may have underreported their cigarette consumption to meet the inclusion criteria for the clinical trial. The average plasma COT levels derived from ad libitum smoking (244 ng/ml) is similar to those found previously in a heavier smoking population of African-Americans (292 ng/ml) recruited for a clinical trial of smoking cessation at the same community health centre as the current study, with an inclusion criteria of smoking at least 10 CPD (mean = 17 CPD) (30). It is also possible that self-reported CPD is a poor measure of average cigarette consumption among individuals at this low level of smoking, which may in part explain their weak correlations to the biomarkers. In a previous study of an African-Canadian light smoking population (median of 8 CPD), we found some discrepancies of cigarette consumption when it was reported as cigarettes per day, versus cigarettes per week (CPW), versus cigarettes per month (CPM)(Mwenifumbo JC, Tyndale RF, personal communications). For example, one individual reported consuming 6 CPD, but 18 CPW and 60 CPM. Thus, in light smokers where daily smoking is variable and smoking may occur at irregular intervals, CPD may be a poor indicator of consumption and alternative measures of self-report, such as timeline follow-back procedures (43), needs to be tested. It is also notable that a large portion of the participants (45%) reported puffing or inhaling as far as the throat only. While self-reported measures of depth of inhalation may not be representative of actual smoking behaviors (44), this may be another source of variability in cigarette exposure among these light smokers.

In summary, the results from this study suggest that the commonly used biomarkers of cigarette smoke exposure, expired CO and plasma COT, are significantly but weakly correlated with self-reported CPD. Furthermore, these relationships are not greatly altered by variables that were previously reported to have an influence on these parameters, such as CYP2A6 activity, smoking mentholated cigarettes or age, although the relationships may differ slightly by gender and BMI. The proportion of variance in CPD explained by expired CO and plasma COT was generally lower than that observed in heavy Caucasians smokers even after accounting for these variables, suggesting these biomarkers are limited as indicators of cigarette smoke exposure among African-American light smokers.

Our study suggests that expired CO may be a poor indicator of smoking status as many smokers had expired CO levels below the traditionally defined cutoff level. While plasma COT may be useful in ascertaining smoking status in this population, the level is highly influenced by the rate of CYP2A6 activity, and it is also a poor indicator of the levels of smoke exposure. This suggests the rate of CYP2A6 activity needs to be considered when COT is used as a biomarker of intake in African-American populations, where there are higher proportions of individuals with reduced rates of CYP2A6 activity compared to Caucasians. A number of other biomarkers such as thiocyanate or the tobacco alkaloids anabasine and anatabine have also been proposed (1); however, these also have their own set of limitations in terms of specificity, sensitivity and cost for detection. Validated biomarkers are important for ascertaining smoking status before recruitment into research studies or clinical trials for smoking cessation, or for verifying abstinence among light smokers. In addition, validated biomarkers of cigarette smoke exposure are also necessary for the proper assessment of the dose-related risk of smoking and health outcomes in epidemiological studies of African-Americans, a population that have been reported to have a disproportionately elevated risk of developing tobacco-related illnesses despite lower levels of self-reported cigarette consumption (45, 46).

Acknowledgments

Financial support: This study was supported by Centre for Addictions and Mental Health, NSERC CGS-D Scholarship (MKH), SPICE Scholarship from Interdisciplinary Capacity Enhancement Team (MKH), National Institutes of Health grants DA02277 and DA12393 (NLB), CA91912 (JSA), CIHR MOP86471 and Canada Research Chair in Pharmacogenetics (RFT).

Footnotes

Conflicts of interests: Dr. R.F. Tyndale hold shares and is a CSO in Nicogen Research Inc., a company that is focused on novel smoking cessation treatment approaches. None of the data contained in this manuscript alters or improves any commercial aspect of Nicogen, no Nicogen funds were used in this work, and the manuscript was not reviewed by others affiliated with Nicogen. Dr. R.F. Tyndale has also been a paid consultant for Novartis. Dr. Benowitz is a paid advisor to several pharmaceutical companies that market or are developing smoking cessation medications, and also serves as a paid expert witness in litigation against tobacco companies. Dr. Ahluwalia is a consultant to Pfizer Inc.

*(http://www.cypalleles.ki.se/cyp2a6.htm)

References

1. Benowitz NL, Peyton J, III, Ahijevych K, et al. Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2002;4(2):149–159. [PubMed]
2. Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend C, Vesey C, Saloojee Y. Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. American Journal of Public Health. 1987;77(11):1435–1438. [PubMed]
3. Hukkanen J, Jacob P, III, Benowitz NL. Metabolism and Disposition Kinetics of Nicotine. Pharmacol Rev. 2005;57(1):79–115. [PubMed]
4. Scherer G. Carboxyhemoglobin and thiocyanate as biomarkers of exposure to carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide in tobacco smoke. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology. 2006;58(2–3):101. [PubMed]
5. Perez-Stable EJ, Benowitz NL, Marin G. Is serum cotinine a better measure of cigarette smoking than self-report? Preventive Medicine. 1995;24:171–179. [PubMed]
6. Mustonen TK, Spencer SM, Hoskinson RA, Sachs DP, AJG The influence of gender, race, and menthol content on tobacco exposure measures. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2005;7(4):581–90. [PubMed]
7. Domino EF, Ni L. Clinical phenotyping strategies in selection of tobacco smokers for future genotyping studies. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2002;26(6):1071. [PubMed]
8. Benowitz NL, Jacob P., 3rd Metabolism of nicotine to cotinine studied by a dual stable isotope method. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 1994;56:483–493. [PubMed]
9. Nakajima M, Yamamoto T, Nunoya K, et al. Characterization of CYP2A6 involved in 3′-hydroxylation of cotinine in human liver microsomes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;277(2):1010–5. [PubMed]
10. Dempsey D, Tutka P, Jacob P, et al. Nicotine metabolite ratio as an index of cytochrome P450 2A6 metabolic activity. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2004;76(1):64. [PubMed]
11. Messina ES, Tyndale RF, Sellers EM. A Major Role for CYP2A6 in Nicotine C-Oxidation by Human Liver Microsomes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;282(3):1608–1614. [PubMed]
12. Mwenifumbo JC, Tyndale RF. Genetic variability in CYP2A6 and the pharmacokinetics of nicotine. Pharmacogenomics. 2007;8(10):1385–1402. [PubMed]
13. Caraballo RS, Giovino GA, Pechacek TF, et al. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Serum Cotinine Levels of Cigarette Smokers: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1991. JAMA. 1998;280(2):135–139. [PubMed]
14. Benowitz NL, Perez-Stable EJ, Fong I, Modin G, Herrera B, Jacob P., III Ethnic Differences in N-Glucuronidation of Nicotine and Cotinine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;291(3):1196–1203. [PubMed]
15. Ho MK, Mwenifumbo JC, Al Koudsi N, et al. Association of Nicotine Metabolite Ratio and CYP2A6 Genotype With Smoking Cessation Treatment in African-American Light Smokers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85(6):635–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Werley MS, Coggins CRE, Lee PN. Possible effects on smokers of cigarette mentholation: A review of the evidence relating to key research questions. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2007;47(2):189. [PubMed]
17. Benowitz NL, Herrera B, Jacob P., III Mentholated Cigarette Smoking Inhibits Nicotine Metabolism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;310(3):1208–1215. [PubMed]
18. MacDougall JM, Fandrick K, Zhang X, Serafin SV, Cashman JR. Inhibition of Human Liver Microsomal (S)-Nicotine Oxidation by (−)-Menthol and Analogues. Chem Res Toxicol. 2003;16(8):988–993. [PubMed]
19. Ahijevych K, Tyndale RF, Dhatt RK, Weed HG, Browning KK. Factors influencing cotinine half-life during smoking abstinence in African American and Caucasian women. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2002;4:423–431. [PubMed]
20. Patterson F, Benowitz N, Shields P, et al. Individual Differences in Nicotine Intake per Cigarette. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(5):468–471. [PubMed]
21. Swan GE, Habina K, Means B, Jobe JB, JLE Saliva cotinine and recent smoking--evidence for a nonlinear relationship. Public Health Report. 1993;108(6):779–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Benowitz NL, Lessov-Schlaggar CN, Swan GE, Jacob P., 3rd Female sex and oral contraceptive use accelerate nicotine metabolism. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;79(5):480–488. [PubMed]
23. Higashi E, Fukami T, Itoh M, et al. Human CYP2A6 Is Induced by Estrogen via Estrogen Receptor. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007;35(10):1935–1941. [PubMed]
24. Okuyemi KS, Harris KJ, Scheibmeir M, Choi WS, Powell J, JSA Light smokers: issues and recommendations. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2002;4(Suppl 2):S103–12. [PubMed]
25. Malaiyandi V, Goodz S, Sellers EM, Tyndale RF. CYP2A6 genotype, phenotype and the use of nicotine metabolites as biomarkers during ad libitum smoking. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(10):1812–1819. [PubMed]
26. Ahluwalia JS, Okuyemi K, Nollen N, et al. The effects of nicotine gum and counseling among African American light smokers: a 2X2 factorial design. Addiction. 2006;101(6):883–891. [PubMed]
27. Nollen NL, Mayo MS, Sanderson Cox L, et al. Predictors of Quitting Among African American Light Smokers Enrolled in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006;21(6):590–595. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Joseph AM, Hecht SS, Murphy SE, et al. Relationships between Cigarette Consumption and Biomarkers of Tobacco Toxin Exposure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(12):2963–2968. [PubMed]
29. Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, Mant D, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;23(1):CD000146. [PubMed]
30. Ahluwalia JS, Harris KJ, Catley D, Okuyemi KS, Mayo MS. Sustained-Release Bupropion for Smoking Cessation in African Americans: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2002;288(4):468–474. [PubMed]
31. Waage H, Silsand T, Urdal P, LangÅRd S. Discrimination of Smoking Status by Thiocyanate and Cotinine in Serum, and Carbon Monoxide in Expired Air. Int J Epidemiol. 1992;21(3):488–493. [PubMed]
32. Benowitz NL, Bernert JT, Caraballo RS, Holiday DB, Wang J. Optimal Serum Cotinine Levels for Distinguishing Cigarette Smokers and Nonsmokers Within Different Racial/Ethnic Groups in the United States Between 1999 and 2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(2):236–248. [PubMed]
33. Benowitz NL, Swan GE, Jacob P, Lessov-Schlaggar CN, Tyndale RF. CYP2A6 genotype and the metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine[ast] Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;80(5):457. [PubMed]
34. Mooney ME, Li Z-z, Murphy SE, Pentel PR, Le C, Hatsukami DK. Stability of the Nicotine Metabolite Ratio in ad Libitum and Reducing Smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(6):1396–1400. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Swan GE, Lessov-Schlaggar CN, Bergen AW, He Yungang, Tyndale RF, Benowitz NL. Genetic and environmental influences on the ratio of 3′hydroxycotinine to cotinine in plasma and urine. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics. 2008 In press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Balbach ED, Gasior RJ, Barbeau EM, Reynolds RJ. Targeting of African Americans: 1988–2000. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(5):822–827. [PubMed]
37. Wynne H. Drug metabolism and ageing. Menopause Int. 2005;11(2):51–56. [PubMed]
38. Benowitz NL, Hukkanen J, Jacob P. Nicotine Chemistry, Metabolism, Kinetics and Biomarkers. Nicotine Psychopharmacology. 2009:29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Molander L, Hansson A, Lunell E. Pharmacokinetics of nicotine in healthy elderly people. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69(1):57. [PubMed]
40. Battig K, Buzzi R, Nil R. Smoke yield of cigarettes and puffing behavior in men and women. Psychopharmacology. 1982;76:139–148. [PubMed]
41. Eissenberg T, Adams C, Riggins EC, Likness M. Smokers’ sex and the effects of tobacco cigarettes: Subject-rated and physiological measures. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 1999;1:317–324. [PubMed]
42. Melikian AA, Djordjevic MV, Hosey J, et al. Gender differences relative to smoking behavior and emissions of toxins from mainstream cigarette smoke. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2007;9(3):377–87. [PubMed]
43. Brown RA, Burgess ES, Sales SD, Whitely JA, Evans DM, Miller IW. Reliability and Validity of a Smoking Timeline Follow-Back Interview. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1998;12(2):101–112.
44. Tobin MJ, Jenouri G, Sackner MA. Subjective and objective measurement of cigarette smoke inhalation. Chest. 1982;82(6):696–700. [PubMed]
45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Department of Health and Human Services. Tobacco use among U.S. racial/ethnic minority groups — African-Americans, American-Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: 1998. [PubMed]
46. Haiman CA, Stram DO, Wilkens LR, et al. Ethnic and Racial Differences in the Smoking-Related Risk of Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):333–342. [PubMed]