PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aemPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalAEM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 November; 75(22): 7271–7274.
Published online 2009 October 2. doi:  10.1128/AEM.00687-09
PMCID: PMC2786539

Occurrence of Putative Pathogenicity Islands in Enterococci from Distinct Species and of Differing Origins[down-pointing small open triangle]

Abstract

Enterococci isolated from ewe's milk and cheese, clinical isolates of human and veterinary origins, and reference strains obtained from culture collections were screened for the occurrence of putative pathogenicity island (PAIs). Results obtained after PCR amplification and hybridization point toward PAI dissemination among enterococci of diverse origins (food/clinical) and species (Enterococcus faecalis/non-E. faecalis).

Enterococci are ubiquitous microorganisms traditionally viewed as commensal bacteria but now established as major community-acquired and nosocomial pathogens causing a variety of infections. They are opportunistic pathogens and generally exhibit a low level of pathogenicity; however, in recent years, several potential enterococcal virulence factors have been identified but their exact role in the pathogenesis mechanisms is still not fully established (2, 12, 13).

Genomic islands are large genomic regions which frequently harbor mobility loci and gene clusters with specific functions. Genomic islands harboring genes that contribute, directly or indirectly, to the pathogenic potency of the harboring microorganism are termed pathogenicity islands (PAIs). The generalized sequencing of genomes revealed that PAIs are much more widespread than previously thought (3).

In the genus Enterococcus, two PAIs have been described: one in a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis strain responsible for a nosocomial outbreak (15) and the other in nosocomial E. faecium strains (4). More recently (9), the worldwide dissemination of the E. faecalis PAI among isolates from diverse locations and different origins was demonstrated. However, the majority of the studies previously performed analyzed clinical isolates of the species E. faecalis. So, in the present investigation we broadened the range of origins (food/clinical) and species (E. faecalis/non-E. faecalis) with the aim of understanding if the genus Enterococcus constitutes a risk or if the capacity to infect humans and cause disease is limited to specific species or origins.

In this study, 40 enterococcal isolates previously identified (1) and representing distinct virulence potential (12, 13) were screened for the presence of putative PAIs by a sequential polyphasic approach.

First, all enterococci were screened by PCR for PAI-related genes (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The analyzed loci represent diverse regions of the E. faecalis PAI (15) and include the esp and araC-like genes also present in the putative PAI identified in E. faecium (4). All isolates showed between 11 and 22 genes (Table (Table11 and data not shown), with food strain QSE123 presenting the lowest incidence and four strains harboring the majority of the regions under analysis (22 genes). Eight of the analyzed loci were detected in more than 90% of the enterococci, pointing to a high conservation of these regions. Only locus ef0571 was detected in less than 10% of the isolates.

TABLE 1.
Incidence of PAI-related loci among the food, clinical, and reference enterococci tested in this study

In 2005, Nallapareddy and coworkers (9) analyzed 454 E. faecalis isolates and identified isolate-specific deletions in four PAI regions: one included cylM, araC, and ef0534 and was also previously described for E. faecalis V583 (15); the second included ef0530 and ef0534; the third corresponded to region ef0571; and the fourth included loci ef0604 to ef0609. PAI variability was also reported by other authors (7, 8) and corroborates the findings observed in the present study, where deletions were found throughout the PAI, with major incidence among loci cbh to esp, ef0551 to ef0571, and ef0628. After chi-square analysis of contingency tables, a statistically significant association was found between the presence of the gene cbh and clinical origin (P = 0.00525). Distinct results were observed in previous studies (9) where the esp, xylA, and gls24-like genes were enriched in infection-derived isolates. The differences observed are probably due to sample size effects (454 isolates of E. faecalis versus 40 of enterococci).

In conclusion, after PCR screening for PAI-related genes, 13 putative PAI-harboring enterococci were selected, including reference, clinical human/veterinarian, and food isolates.

Subsequently, a genome-walking strategy was applied to establish the genetic organization of the putative PAIs by comparison with the positive controls included in this study (MMH594, E. faecalis complete PAI; V583, E. faecalis PAI with a deletion [15]; E300, E. faecium putative PAI [4]). The results obtained with 33 primer combinations (see Table S2 in the supplemental material) are summarized in Fig. Fig.11 and show that the majority of the strains possess more than 20 of the analyzed loci, with the least-conserved regions being located between the genes cbh and esp, pointing to this region as a “deletion hot spot” and suggesting that some deletions are more favored than others, as can be inferred from the results reported by other authors (7, 8, 9, 15). Excluding the PAI-harboring control strains, the isolate harboring more PAI-related genes was LN11, an E. casseliflavus ewe's milk isolate with an amplification profile almost 100% identical to that of MMH594. The diversity of genetic organizations observed in the putative PAIs is probably a reflection of the enterococcal ability to acquire and share material with other bacteria inhabiting the same ecological niche.

FIG. 1.
Genetic organization of the putative enterococcal PAIs (dendrogram obtained with the BioNumerics software, version 4.61 [Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium], Pearson's correlation coefficient, and the unweighted-pair group method using average linkages). ...

Subsequently, to test for physical linkage of the virulence-related genes in the same region of the bacterial chromosome, total cell DNA was cleaved with restriction enzymes (I-Ceu-I, SfiI, and SmaI), the macrorestriction fragments were separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE; contour-clamped homogeneous electric field with pulse times increasing linearly from 5 to 35 s for 22 h at 220 V), transferred to nylon membranes by Southern blotting (11), and hybridized under high-stringency conditions (probes and signals detected with Dig-High Prime DNA labeling and detection starter kit II as recommended by the manufacturer (Roche Diagnostics).

The restriction enzyme I-Ceu-I recognizes a unique sequence within the 23S rRNA (5), so cleavage of total DNA, followed by hybridization with a 16S rRNA gene probe (6), highlights the fragments corresponding to genomic DNA, allowing the distinction between chromosomal DNA and extrachromosomal elements. When rehybridization of the same membrane with a PAI gene as the probe reveals a positive hybridization signal in the same fragment, this demonstrates its chromosomal nature. Subsequent hybridizations with other PAI-related probes confirm the physical linkage of those loci in the same region of the bacterial chromosome, pointing to the presence of putative PAIs.

Figure Figure22 shows the results obtained after DNA cleavage with I-Ceu-I (Fig. (Fig.2,2, left panel), followed by hybridization with the 16S rRNA gene (Fig. (Fig.2,2, center panel) and cylMBA (Fig. (Fig.2,2, right panel) probes, which demonstrate the chromosomal location of the cyl operon in veterinary clinical strain V434 and food isolates LN11, LA78, and QCB54. Concerning the other cyl-positive enterococci included in this investigation, very weak or no hybridization signals were obtained (data not shown), suggesting that such traits must be carried by plasmids.

FIG. 2.
Macrorestriction profile obtained with the endonuclease I-Ceu-I (left panel) and corresponding hybridization with 16S rRNA gene (center panel) and cylMBA (right panel) probes. Lanes 1 and 18, λ ladder PFGE marker (New England BioLabs); lane 2, ...

Subsequently, Southern blot assays of SfiI and SmaI macrorestriction profiles were hybridized with esp and cylMBA (Fig. (Fig.3,3, left and right panels, respectively). Hybridization of the two probes within the same-size macrorestriction fragment was observed for strains MMH594 and LN11, pointing to the physical linkage of these PAI-related genes in ewe's milk E. casseliflavus isolate LN11. For V583, with a deletion including this region, as expected, no hybridization signal was observed.

FIG. 3.
Hybridization signals obtained by using the PAI-related genes esp (left panel) and cylMBA (right panel) as probes. Left panel: lanes 1 and 17, λ ladder PFGE marker (New England BioLabs); lanes 2 to 8, MMH594, E300, V434, LN9, LN11, LA78, and QA40 ...

Positive amplification with primer combination EF-1/ER-2, directed to specific regions of E. faecalis V583 located before and after its PAI (10), demonstrated that in strains V95 and QSE123, either the PAI is absent or its insertion occurred at a distinct location. For the other 11 putative PAI-harboring enterococci, primer combinations EF1/ER1 (before the PAI/at the beginning of the PAI) and EF2/ER2 (at the end of the PAI/outside of the PAI) confirmed a PAI insertion site similar to that of MMH594 and V583, as also reported for other enterococci (7, 8, 9, 14).

Although there are many differences within this genomic region of the isolates under analysis, the overall results point toward PAI dissemination among enterococci from diverse origins (ewe's milk/cheese) and species (E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. casseliflavus, E. raffinosus, E. durans, and E. hirae), suggesting a wide pathogenicity potential of the genus Enterococcus.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Footnotes

[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 2 October 2009.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

1. Alves, P. I., M. P. Martins, T. Semedo, J. J. Figueiredo-Marques, R. Tenreiro, and M. T. Barreto-Crespo. 2004. Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic taxonomic methods for the identification of dairy enterococci. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 85:237-252. [PubMed]
2. Eaton, T. J., and M. J. Gasson. 2001. Molecular screening of Enterococcus virulence determinants and potential for genetic exchange between food and medical isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:1628-1635. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Hacker, J., and J. B. Kaper. 2000. Pathogenicity islands and the evolution of microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54:641-679. [PubMed]
4. Leavis, H., J. Top, N. Shankar, K. Borgen, M. Bonten, J. van Embden, and R. J. Willems. 2004. A novel putative enterococcal pathogenicity island linked to the esp virulence gene of Enterococcus faecium and associated with epidemicity. J. Bacteriol. 186:672-682. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Liu, S., A. Hessel, and K. E. Sanderson. 1993. Genomic mapping with I-Ceu I, an intron-encoded endonuclease specific for genes for ribosomal RNA, in Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, and other bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:6874-6878. [PubMed]
6. Massol-Deya, A., D. A. Odelson, R. F. Hickey, and J. M. Tiedje. 1995. Bacterial community fingerprinting of amplified 16S and 16-23S ribosomal DNA gene sequences and restriction endonuclease analysis (ARDRA), p. 1-8. In A. D. L. Akkermans, J. D. van Elsas, and F. J. de Bruijn (ed.), Molecular microbial ecology manual, 3.3.2. Kluyver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
7. McBride, S. M., P. S. Coburn, A. S. Baghdayan, R. J. L. Willems, M. J. Grande, N. Shankar, and M. S. Gilmore. 2009. Genetic variation and evolution of the pathogenicity island of Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 191:3392-3402. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. McBride, S. M., V. A. Fischetti, D. LeBlanc, R. C. Moellering, Jr., and M. S. Gilmore. 2007. Genetic diversity among Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS ONE 2:e582. doi:.10.1371/journal.pone.0000582 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Nallapareddy, S. R., H. Wenxiang, G. M. Weinstock, and B. E. Murray. 2005. Molecular characterization of a widespread, pathogenic, and antibiotic resistance-receptive Enterococcus faecalis lineage and dissemination of its putative pathogenicity island. J. Bacteriol. 187:5709-5718. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Oancea, C., I. Klare, W. Witte, and G. Werner. 2004. Conjugative transfer of the virulence gene, esp, among isolates of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 54:232-235. [PubMed]
11. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
12. Semedo, T., M. A. Santos, M. F. Lopes, J. J. F. Marques, M. T. Crespo, and R. Tenreiro. 2003. Virulence factors in food, clinical and reference enterococci: a common trait in the genus? Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 26:13-22. [PubMed]
13. Semedo, T., M. A. Santos, P. Martins, M. F. Lopes, J. J. F. Marques, R. Tenreiro, and M. T. Crespo. 2003. Comparative study using type strains and clinical and food isolates to examine hemolytic activity and occurrence of cyl operon in enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2569-2576. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Shankar, N., A. S. Baghdayan, R. Willems, A. M. Hammerum, and L. B. Jensen. 2006. Presence of pathogenicity island genes in Enterococcus faecalis isolates from pigs in Denmark. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4200-4203. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Shankar, N., A. S. Baghdayan, and M. S. Gilmore. 2002. Modulation of virulence within a pathogenicity island in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Nature 417:746-750. [PubMed]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)