PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aacPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalAAC ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 December; 53(12): 5303–5305.
Published online 2009 September 14. doi:  10.1128/AAC.01600-08
PMCID: PMC2786355

Unbound Cephalothin Pharmacokinetics in Adult Burn Patients Are Related to the Elapsed Time after Injury [down-pointing small open triangle]

Abstract

Cephalothin (cefalotin) pharmacokinetics were evaluated for nine severely burned patients (42% ± 9% mean burn areas) and five healthy volunteers by using non-plasma-protein-bound concentration-time profiles. Burn patients gave increased mean residence times (36%) and reduced total clearances (25%). Mean residence times and distribution volumes increased between 1 and 4 days posttrauma, suggesting that burn patient pharmacokinetics change during the initial fluid resuscitation phase of treatment.

Interpatient variability is a consistent feature of burn patient pharmacokinetics (2). Fluid shifts between different body compartments, fluid resuscitation, and effects of surgery all have impacts on the pharmacokinetics of critically ill patients in a variable and unpredictable manner (10, 11). We recently reported that interstitial concentrations of cephalothin (cefalotin) were maintained significantly longer in burnt and nonburnt subcutaneous tissues of burn patients than in those of healthy individuals (4). In the current study, we examine the unbound plasma cephalothin pharmacokinetics of the same burnt and nonburnt individuals. The aim was to provide evidence in support of our published hypothesis that increased cephalothin exposure of burnt and nonburnt tissue sites is a consequence of severe burn injury and the management of shock by fluid resuscitation.

This study was an open-label, single-center pharmacokinetic study of cephalothin in patients with >28% body surface area (BSA) burns during burn debridement surgery within 4 days of trauma. Nine burn patients and five healthy volunteers were studied. The predicted theoretical benefit of prophylactic β-lactam use in this patient cohort has already been discussed (5), and interstitial concentrations of cephalothin have been reported previously for each volunteer and for six of the burn patients (4). The protocol received approval from the Hospital and University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committees. Written informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of the enrolled patients and from the healthy volunteers. Detailed descriptions of the research protocols have been published previously (4, 5). Briefly, patients received 1 g cephalothin in 10 ml 0.9% saline for 5 min through a dedicated lumen of a central venous catheter within 1 h of surgery commencement; volunteers received the same treatment via a forearm vein. Blood sampling into heparinized Vacutainers (BD, NJ) commenced upon the start of the infusion at stipulated time intervals (5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min); plasma samples were stored at −20°C and analyzed within 1 week of collection. Methods for plasma analysis by isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection and relevant assay validation details, have been published elsewhere (5). Unbound cephalothin data were calculated from total plasma cephalothin by correcting for percent plasma binding observed in prestudy plasma samples for each individual. Briefly, 500 μl of 100 μg/ml cephalothin in plasma was incubated (37°C for 30 min) and ultracentrifuged (12,000 × g for 20 min) through 30-kDa-nominal-cutoff membrane devices (Amicon YM30; Millopore Corporation, Billerica, MA) to give a filtrate yield of approximately 25% original volume, which was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Unbound cephalothin plasma concentration-time data were analyzed using biexponential regression (C = A eαt + B eβt), applying 1/y2 weighting to account for assay heteroscedasticity (1). Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2β) was defined as 0.693/β, where β is the terminal elimination rate constant, taken from C. The maximal plasma cephalothin concentrations (Cmax) were the observed values. Area under the curve (AUC) and area under the first moment curve (AUMC) for unbound cephalothin plasma profiles were calculated by the linear trapezoidal method and extrapolated to infinity, where AUC0-∞ is defined as AUC0-t + Ct/β and where AUMC0-∞ is defined as AUMC0-t + (t·Ct/β) + Ct2. Total clearance (CLT) was defined as dose/AUC0-∞ and was normalized for body weight. Mean residence time (MRT) was defined as AUMC0-∞/AUC0-∞ minus mean infusion time, which was defined as infusion time/2. Effective half-life (t1/2) was defined as 0.693·MRT. Apparent volume of distribution under steady-state conditions (Vss) was defined as CLT·MRT and was normalized for body weight. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 16.0.1 for Windows (SPSS, Inc.), and the R computing language was used to compile plots (R Development Core Team [http://www.r-project.org/]). Nonpaired t tests with correction for unequal variance (verified by Levene's f test) were applied, except for t1/2β data, which, being homoscedastic, were analyzed without correction.

Demographics for the nine patients are given in Table Table1,1, consisting of data compiled from intensive care unit records, including plasma protein analysis, sepsis-related organ failure assessment (12), and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (8) data. Total burn surface area (TBSA), subcategorized as partial thickness (second-degree) and full thickness (third-degree) burns, was assessed by the same burn surgeon throughout. Total body surface area (BSA) was calculated by the method of Gehan and George (7). Patient and volunteer creatinine clearance (CLCR) levels were estimated by Pathology Queensland (Herston, Queensland) from prestudy plasma samples and an 8-hour urine sample collection (3). The demographics for the five healthy volunteers (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) were as follows: age, 35 ± 10 years; height, 1.73 ± 0.12 meters; weight, 68 ± 13 kg; BSA, 1.82 ± 0.23 m2.

TABLE 1.
Patient demographics and health assessment scores

The pharmacokinetics data are presented in Table Table2.2. Patients with burn injury had a 45% increase in observed Cmax (P < 0.05; t test), a 25% reduction of cephalothin CLT (P < 0.05; t test), and a 36% increase in MRT (P < 0.05; t test) in comparison to healthy volunteers. Effective plasma t1/2 was also increased in patients with burns in comparison to levels for healthy volunteers (P < 0.05; t test), reflecting the increased MRT since t1/2 is 0.693·MRT. Terminal elimination t1/2β had a trend of being longer in patients than in healthy volunteers that was not statistically significant (P = 0.08; t test). The differences between patients and healthy volunteers in AUC0-∞ and Vss were not statistically significant. Lower percentages of plasma protein binding of cephalothin were observed for patients with burns than for healthy individuals (59% ± 8% versus 71% ± 2%; P < 0.001), and higher mean CLCR values were recorded for patients with burns than for healthy individuals (148 ± 75 ml/min versus 98 ± 19 ml/min; P < 0.001; t test).

TABLE 2.
Pharmacokinetics of unbound cephalothin in patients with severe burns and in a healthy volunteer control group

The dependent pharmacokinetic variables of MRT are Vss and CLT (since MRT is Vss/CLT), and accordingly, there were significant associations between MRT and both Vss and 1/CLT (r = 0.727 [P < 0.05] and r = 0.798 [P = 0.01], respectively). Aberrant pharmacokinetics in burn patients have previously been shown to exhibit covariance with amount of time following burn trauma (9), and in this study, MRT correlated positively with number of days posttrauma (r = 0.727; P < 0.05) (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Interestingly, Vss also correlated with number of days posttrauma (r = 0.724; P < 0.05), but 1/CLT did not (r = 0.515; nonsignificant), indicating that alterations in tissue distribution as opposed to changes in renal function underlie altered MRT in this burn patient cohort.

FIG. 1.
Relationship between number of days following burn trauma and cephalothin (cefalotin) MRT for patients with severe burns. Linear fit: y = 0.1975·x + 0.1775.

We previously reported increased exposure of both burnt and nonburnt subcutaneous tissues to cephalothin in burn patients compared with healthy volunteers (4). This increased peripheral-tissue residence time appears to be reflected in the MRT calculated from unbound plasma data. The cumulative effects on tissue fluid volume of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, net fluid loading, and impaired lymphatic drainage build up during the resuscitative phase of burn treatment. We have shown that MRT and its dependent variable Vss also increase during this period. We conclude that tissue pharmacokinetics play a decisive role in determining unbound plasma pharmacokinetics in burn patients and speculate that aberrant antimicrobial pharmacokinetics may be an unanticipated consequence of excessive fluid resuscitation (6) or an effect of the inflammatory response itself (11).

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (grant no. 351519).

We gratefully acknowledge Melissa Rutt for her technical laboratory assistance.

Footnotes

[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 14 September 2009.

REFERENCES

1. Almeida, A. M., M. M. Castel-Branco, and A. C. Falcão. 2002. Linear regression for calibration lines revisited: weighting schemes for bioanalytical methods. J. Chromatogr. B 774:215-222. [PubMed]
2. Blanchet, B., V. Jullien, C. Vinsonneau, and M. Tod. 2008. Influence of burns on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in the care of burn patients. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 47:635-654. [PubMed]
3. Cockcroft, D. W., and M. H. Gault. 1976. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31-41. [PubMed]
4. Dalley, A. J., J. Lipman, R. Deans, B. Venkatesh, M. Rudd, M. S. Roberts, and S. E. Cross. 2009. Tissue accumulation of cephalothin in burns: a comparative study by microdialysis of subcutaneous interstitial fluid cephalothin concentrations in burn patients and healthy volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:210-215. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Dalley, A. J., J. Lipman, B. Venkatesh, M. Rudd, M. S. Roberts, and S. E. Cross. 2007. Inadequate antimicrobial prophylaxis during surgery: a study of beta-lactam levels during burn debridement. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:166-169. [PubMed]
6. Dulhunty, J. M., R. J. Boots, M. J. Rudd, M. J. Muller, and J. Lipman. 2008. Increased fluid resuscitation can lead to adverse outcomes in major-burn injured patients, but low mortality is achievable. Burns 34:1090-1097. [PubMed]
7. Gehan, E. A., and S. L. George. 1970. Estimation of human body surface area from height and weight. Cancer Chemother. Rep. 54:225-235. [PubMed]
8. Knaus, W. A., E. A. Draper, D. P. Wagner, and J. E. Zimmerman. 1985. APACHE-II: a severity of disease classification-system. Crit. Care Med. 13:818-829. [PubMed]
9. Mohr, J. F., L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, D. J. Wainright, D. H. Parks, T. C. Hollenbeck, and C. D. Ericsson. 2008. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of single-dose intravenous daptomycin in patients with thermal burn injury. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:1891-1893. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Pinder, M., R. Bellomo, and J. Lipman. 2002. Pharmacological principles of antibiotic prescription in the critically ill. Anaesth. Intensive Care 30:134-144. [PubMed]
11. Roberts, J. A., and J. Lipman. 2006. Antibacterial dosing in intensive care—pharmacokinetics, degree of disease and pharmacodynamics of sepsis. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 45:755-773. [PubMed]
12. Vincent, J. L., R. Moreno, J. Takala, S. Willatts, A. DeMendonca, H. Bruining, C. K. Reinhart, P. M. Suter, and L. G. Thijs. 1996. The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med. 22:707-710. [PubMed]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)