1. Persky S, McBride CM. Immersive virtual environment technology: a promising tool for future social and behavioral genomics research and practice. Health Communication. In press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Winn WD. A Conceptual Basis for Educational Applications of Virtual Reality. Seattle, WA: Human Interface Technology Laboratory; 1993.
3. Dede C, Salzman M, Loftin RB, et al. Using virtual reality technology to convey abstract scientific concepts. In: Jacobson MJ, Kozma RB, editors. Learning the Sciences of the 21st Century: Research, Design, and Implementing Advanced Technology Learning Environments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997.
4. Barab SA, Hay KE, Barnett MG, et al. Constructing virtual worlds: tracing the historical development of learner practices/understandings. Cognition & Instruction. 2001;19:47–94.
5. Schuemie MJ, van der Straaten P, Merel K, et al. Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2001;4:183–201. [PubMed]
6. Lee KM. Presence, explicated. Communication Theory. 2004;14:27–50.
7. Whitelock D, Romano D, Jelfs A, et al. Perfect presence: What does this mean for the design of virtual learning environments? Education & Information Technologies. 2000;5:277–89.
8. Winn W. Learning science in virtual environments: the interplay of theory and experience. Themes in Education. 2000;1:373–89.
9. Moreno R, Mayer RE. Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2002;94:598–610.
10. Selverian MM, Hwang HS. search of presence: a systematic evaluation of evolving VLEs. Presence. 2004;12:512–22.
11. Jelfs A, Whitelock D. The notion of presence in virtual learning environments: what makes the environment “real” British Journal of Educational Technology. 2000;31:145–52.
12. Winn W, Windschitl M, Fruland R, et al. When does immersion in a virtual environment help students construct understanding?. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Science; Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2002. pp. 497–503.
13. Mikropoulos TA. Presence: a unique characteristic in educational virtual environments. Virtual Reality. 2006;10:197–206.
15. Mikropoulos TA, Strouboulis V. Factors that influence presence in educational virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2004;7:582–91. [PubMed]
16. Zhang D, Nunamaker JF. Powering e-learning in the new millennium: an overview of e-learning and enabling technology. Information Systems Frontiers. 2003;5:207–18.
17. Bouras C, Tsiatsos T. Educational virtual environments: design rationale and architecture. Multimedia Tools & Applications. 2006;29:153–73.
18. Bailenson JN, Yee N, Blascovich J, et al. The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: digital transformation of teachers, students, and social context. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2008;17:102–41.
19. Okita SY, Bailenson JN, Schwartz DL. The mere belief of social interaction improves learning. Paper presented at 29th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society; August 2007; Nashville, TN.
20. Kaphingst KA, Persky S, McCall C, et al. Testing the effects of educational strategies on comprehension of a genomic concept using virtual reality technology. Patient Education and Counseling. in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Petty RE, Cacioppo J. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
22. Kaphingst KA, Persky S, McCall C, et al. Testing communication strategies to convey genomic concepts using virtual reality technology. Journal of Health Communication. In press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Swinth KR, Blascovich J. Conformity to group norms in an immersive virtual environment. Toronto, Canada: American Psychological Society; 2001.
24. Persky S, Blascovich J. Immersive virtual video game play and presence: influences on aggressive feelings and behavior. Presence. 2008;17:57–72.
25. Evland WP, Jr, Shah DV, Kwak N. Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: a panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during Campaign 2000. Communication Research. 2003;30:359–86.
26. Moreno R, Mayer RE. Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2005;97:117–28.
27. Roser C. Involvement, attention, and perceptions of message relevance in the response to persuasive appeals. Communication Research. 1990;17:571–600.
28. Cheng I-H. Testing an integrated model of smoking information processing. Boston: National Communication Association, Health Communication Division; 2005.
29. Lim CP, Nonis D, Hedberg J. Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: Engaging students in science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2006;37:211–31.
30. Johnson A, Moher T, Ohlsson S, et al. The round earth project: collaborative VR for conceptual learning. Virtual Reality. 1999;19:60–8.