1. Persky S, McBride CM. Immersive virtual environment technology: a promising tool for future social and behavioral genomics research and practice. Health Communication. In press.
2. Winn WD. A Conceptual Basis for Educational Applications of Virtual Reality. Seattle, WA: Human Interface Technology Laboratory; 1993.
3. Dede C, Salzman M, Loftin RB, et al. Using virtual reality technology to convey abstract scientific concepts. In: Jacobson MJ, Kozma RB, editors. Learning the Sciences of the 21st Century: Research, Design, and Implementing Advanced Technology Learning Environments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997.
4. Barab SA, Hay KE, Barnett MG, et al. Constructing virtual worlds: tracing the historical development of learner practices/understandings. Cognition & Instruction. 2001;19:47–94.
5. Schuemie MJ, van der Straaten P, Merel K, et al. Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2001;4:183–201. [PubMed]
6. Lee KM. Presence, explicated. Communication Theory. 2004;14:27–50.
7. Whitelock D, Romano D, Jelfs A, et al. Perfect presence: What does this mean for the design of virtual learning environments? Education & Information Technologies. 2000;5:277–89.
8. Winn W. Learning science in virtual environments: the interplay of theory and experience. Themes in Education. 2000;1:373–89.
9. Moreno R, Mayer RE. Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2002;94:598–610.
10. Selverian MM, Hwang HS. search of presence: a systematic evaluation of evolving VLEs. Presence. 2004;12:512–22.
11. Jelfs A, Whitelock D. The notion of presence in virtual learning environments: what makes the environment “real” British Journal of Educational Technology. 2000;31:145–52.
12. Winn W, Windschitl M, Fruland R, et al. When does immersion in a virtual environment help students construct understanding?. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Science; Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2002. pp. 497–503.
13. Mikropoulos TA. Presence: a unique characteristic in educational virtual environments. Virtual Reality. 2006;10:197–206.
15. Mikropoulos TA, Strouboulis V. Factors that influence presence in educational virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2004;7:582–91. [PubMed]
16. Zhang D, Nunamaker JF. Powering e-learning in the new millennium: an overview of e-learning and enabling technology. Information Systems Frontiers. 2003;5:207–18.
17. Bouras C, Tsiatsos T. Educational virtual environments: design rationale and architecture. Multimedia Tools & Applications. 2006;29:153–73.
18. Bailenson JN, Yee N, Blascovich J, et al. The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: digital transformation of teachers, students, and social context. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2008;17:102–41.
19. Okita SY, Bailenson JN, Schwartz DL. The mere belief of social interaction improves learning. Paper presented at 29th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society; August 2007; Nashville, TN.
20. Kaphingst KA, Persky S, McCall C, et al. Testing the effects of educational strategies on comprehension of a genomic concept using virtual reality technology. Patient Education and Counseling. in press.
21. Petty RE, Cacioppo J. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
22. Kaphingst KA, Persky S, McCall C, et al. Testing communication strategies to convey genomic concepts using virtual reality technology. Journal of Health Communication. In press.
23. Swinth KR, Blascovich J. Conformity to group norms in an immersive virtual environment. Toronto, Canada: American Psychological Society; 2001.
24. Persky S, Blascovich J. Immersive virtual video game play and presence: influences on aggressive feelings and behavior. Presence. 2008;17:57–72.
25. Evland WP, Jr, Shah DV, Kwak N. Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: a panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during Campaign 2000. Communication Research. 2003;30:359–86.
26. Moreno R, Mayer RE. Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2005;97:117–28.
27. Roser C. Involvement, attention, and perceptions of message relevance in the response to persuasive appeals. Communication Research. 1990;17:571–600.
28. Cheng I-H. Testing an integrated model of smoking information processing. Boston: National Communication Association, Health Communication Division; 2005.
29. Lim CP, Nonis D, Hedberg J. Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: Engaging students in science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2006;37:211–31.
30. Johnson A, Moher T, Ohlsson S, et al. The round earth project: collaborative VR for conceptual learning. Virtual Reality. 1999;19:60–8.