PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
 
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 December 1; 59(569): 945.
PMCID: PMC2784536

Respiratory infections

I read the themed October BJGP on respiratory infections with both interest and nostalgia. I would like to make two general points.

First, although Verheij's admirable leading article uses and quotes the phrase ‘antibiotic revolution’,1 what struck me most in the linked papers was not how much has changed over the last 30 years, but how little things have changed. Wang et al's findings of large inter-practice prescribing variations2 closely mirror the pattern of the 1970s. And extrapolating from the data Meropol et al3 present, it seems that in 2004 just over 50% of all consultations for respiratory infections (combining his figures for adults and children) resulted in an antibiotic being prescribed, a figure not very different from the 58% we reported three decades ago. If there has been a drop in the volume of antibiotic prescribing, it is as likely to be due to changing demography or consultation availability, as it is to any sustained influence of educational interventions aimed at doctors.

Second, I was struck by the fact that none of the 121 references in the four relevant articles was to papers published earlier than 1990. This is part of a now regular pattern resulting from the increased use of review articles to introduce literature reviews and meta-analyses to summarise clinical trials. Although labour-saving for the author, this trend results in the airbrushing out of apposite historical work which might illuminate the work being undertaken.

In this case, I was obviously disappointed that none of the work I and others had been associated with in earlier years to try to describe and influence the determinants of antibiotic prescribing had earned a reference, not least because it contributes to understanding why unnecessary prescribing continues.

However, a solution is at hand. The J Health Serv Res Policy runs a series ‘Worth a Second Look’, and I was recently invited to re-visit one of my apparently out-dated articles (from J R Coll Gen Pract 1972 entitled ‘Diagnosis — the Achilles Heel’), and comment on its relevance to medicine today. The resulting paper is now available online4 and will be available in hard copy early in 2010. For those thinking of researching in this rich field, the essay includes relevant starter references, and also a model suggesting how difficult it is likely to be to make changes to the antibiotic prescribing status quo.

Come to think of it, given the proven effectiveness of the QOF financial incentives in changing patterns of care,5 why not simply debit practice incomes with the cost of all antibiotics prescribed, less whatever is deemed the necessary annual mean antibiotic requirement per patient? It could work!

REFERENCES

1. Verheij TJM. The antibiotic revolution should be more focused. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(567):716–717. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Wang KY, Seed P, Schofield P, et al. Which practices are high antibiotic prescribers? A cross-sectional analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(567):e315–e20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Meropol SP, Chen Z, Metlay JP. Reduced antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in adults and children. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(567):e321–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Howie J. Diagnosis in general practice and its implications for quality of care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 [Epub ahead of print] [PubMed]
5. Campbell SM, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, et al. Effect of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(4):34–44. [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners