PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Am Board Fam Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 25.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2782649
NIHMSID: NIHMS157979

Characteristics of Mother-Provider Interactions surrounding Postpartum Return to Work

Abstract

Background

Many mothers with infants work full-time, yet little is known about communication between women and healthcare providers regarding returning to work (RTW).

Methods

Survey data were obtained from a community-based sample of mothers returning to full-time employment within 4 months postpartum. Bivariate analyses (chi-square and independent samples t-tests) and multivariate logistic regressions were specified.

Results

Eighty-three percent of mothers believed prenatal providers should discuss RTW, yet only 60% had such a discussion; 58% discussed RTW with their infants' provider. Black women (OR 2.6) and women in poverty (OR 3.6) more often reported having a RTW discussion with a prenatal provider whereas mothers with college degrees or higher (OR 2.7) more often had RTW discussions with their infant's provider. RTW discussions occurred ≤3 times and were felt to be only somewhat useful. RTW discussions infrequently centered on maternal health (19.5%) or infant health or development (35.5%).

Conclusions

Women want providers to initiate RTW discussions. Providers should be aware that race, poverty status, and level of maternal education impact a mother's odds of having a RTW discussion. Additional research is required to further delineate the content of RTW discussions and to determine the clinical value of RTW discussions.

Introduction

In an effort to enhance health outcomes, increased emphasis is being placed on health care providers' ability to provide patient-centered care (1-5). While various definitions of patient-centered care have been proposed, the fundamental idea is that the provision of patient-centered care depends upon knowing the patient as a whole person, in addition to providing accurate diagnosis and appropriate medical management (6-9). A patient-centered approach to care has been shown to improve health outcomes in the treatment of diabetes (3) and musculoskeletal conditions (4), in decreasing general complaints of discomfort and improving emotional health (5), and in improving patient satisfaction (2).

The past four decades have seen significant increases in the number of employed women in the labor force. In 1970, 43% of women 16 years or older were in the labor force compared with 59% in 2006 (10). Women 16 years of age or older with a child under 3 years of age comprised 56% of the labor force in 2006 (10). Two-thirds of women delivering their first child between the years 2001-2003 worked during their pregnancy; of those, 58% returned to work within 3 months (11). Despite these shifts in women's employment little is known about the interactions women have with their healthcare providers regarding their return to work (RTW) following the delivery of a child. Discussing RTW with pregnant or postpartum women fits into the patient-centered care framework because it provides an opportunity to understand a key aspect of women's lives outside of the biomedical condition of pregnancy.

It is widely accepted that women's employment is generally associated with more favorable health outcomes with respect to physical and psychological health (12), nevertheless, conflicts that inevitably arise for working parents can undermine some of the health advantages gained by employment. In the general population, difficulty combining work and family has been associated with a greater risk of physical disorders such as hypertension (13) and obesity (14), as well as elevated rates of psychiatric disorders (15). Specifically, among postpartum women, difficulty combining work and family is associated with greater physical and emotional symptoms and lower self-rated health (16). Indeed, recognizing the potential public health value, the National Institutes of Health has established the “Work, Family, Health, and Well-Being Initiative” where research is being undertaken to identify solutions for minimizing work-family conflict as a comprehensive approach to improving population health (17).

Despite the large number of pregnant and postpartum mothers in the labor force and the potential health-related concerns that may accompany RTW, studies examining patient-provider communication about RTW have received scant attention. Whether women want providers to discuss issues about RTW and the current frequency and content of such discussions is unknown. The goal of this study is to provide an initial description of patient-provider communication surrounding women's postpartum RTW. To accomplish this goal we: 1) describe the demographic and personal characteristics of pregnant and postpartum women having a RTW discussion with a provider and 2) document the frequency, maternal value, and content of RTW discussions between pregnant and postpartum women and providers.

Methods

The data for this study are from a community-based sample of employed mothers of newborns in Forsyth County, NC. The study was designed to document the strategies that employed mothers used to balance their work and family lives, and to determine if variation in mothers' strategies for combining work and family contributed to differences in women's and infants health. Data were collected at four points; at a baseline assessment, when infants were four months of age and at follow-up assessments when children were 8, 12, and 16 months of age. Measures of patient-provider communication were obtained during the baseline (4-month) assessments. One question related to the content of the RTW discussion was collected at both the 4-month and 8-month assessments. Institutional review board approval for this study was granted from both Wake Forest University Health Sciences and Forsyth Medical Center.

Sample Frame

The sample frame constructed for this study consisted of new mothers working 30 or more hours per week. All infants born in Forsyth County receive care through a single mother-infant hospital unit at some point during the first week of life. A member of the investigative team monitored the daily census of the mother-infant unit and identified mothers who reported working during their pregnancy based on information contained in the electronic medical record. Women identified as being employed were approached in their hospital room after their infant was born, but prior to discharge, to introduce the study and identify whether the mother was willing to be contacted within the next three months about the study. A total of 704 mothers were approached and 630 (89%) provided approval for subsequent contact.

All women in the sampling frame received a series of personal contacts plus nominal mailed gifts. Within one week of returning home from the hospital, women entering the sample frame were mailed a personalized “congratulations” card from the investigative team. When the newborn was one, two, and three months of age mothers received age-specific educational materials about their child's development as well as how to evaluate and respond to common illnesses among infants (e.g., ear infection, fever). These mailings served two purposes. First, like the basic strategy outlined by Dillman (18) for promoting good responses to mailed surveys, the mailings were intended to build a sense of personal relationship with and social obligation to the project. Second, the mailings were intended as tracking devices: if mailings were returned, it signaled a need for an alternate strategy for re-contacting mothers. If a letter was returned, the address was either corrected using the information on the returned mail (i.e., a forwarding address), or the mother was contacted by phone to correct the address.

Recruitment

Five hundred eighteen mothers of the 630 mothers granting approval to be contacted were randomly selected for contact and potential recruitment. Eligible study subjects were postpartum women (age 18 and older) who 1) had already returned to or planned to return to full-time work (≥ 30 hours per week) outside the home by the time their children were 4 months of age, and 2) had infants less than 4 months of age. Exclusion criteria included having a child with special healthcare needs or a mother who did not speak English adequately to participate in the interview. Recruitment success is illustrated in Figure 1. Of the 288 eligible mothers, 217 agreed to participate and completed a baseline interview, yielding an overall cooperation rate of 75.3%. Among the 116 study ineligible mothers, 94% were ineligible because they did not meet the employment-related inclusion criterion.

Figure 1
Study Participant Flow

Data Collection

Data were obtained from interviewer-administered survey questionnaires. A team of 6 trained interviewers collected all data during face-to-face interviews. Interviewers participated in an 8-hour training program consisting of a thorough review of the study purpose, participant selection and recruitment, data collection procedures, as well as tips for recognizing participant fatigue and potential child abuse or neglect. Over 10% of participants were randomly selected and re-contacted for purposes of quality control. Project staff called participants to verify key data elements from completed interviews and whether the participant received the incentive for the interview. In all cases, interviewers were reported to be courteous and professional, all participants received their incentives, and there was no evidence that interviewers falsified data.

Measures

Individual characteristics - Demographic

Variables included maternal age, ethnicity (Black vs. non-Hispanic white) and marital status (currently married vs. single). Maternal level of education categories were defined as “Less than College Graduate” (which included high school graduate [including equivalency] or less, some college or associate's degree), or “College Degree or higher” (which included bachelor's degree, graduate or professional degree). Annual household income was categorized based on sample quartiles. Income was also categorized as above or below the 2007 poverty thresholds.

Individual characteristics - Personal

Variables included type of childcare arrangement (family member, formal daycare, other), infant feeding method (strictly breastfeeding or not), perceived socioeconomic status (SES) (19), length of maternity leave from work, and economic hardship. Economic hardship was assessed by first computing the sum of two variables, one assessing having difficulty paying bills and one assessing monthly financial status, and then dichotomizing the result using a split at the median into “Less Hardship” and “More Hardship”.

Employment characteristics

Hours worked were assessed in terms of the total number of hours per week worked on all jobs since returning to work.

Maternal-Provider communication characteristics

The literature is devoid of existing items or instruments assessing patient-provider communication among mothers returning to work following the birth of a child. As such, we included questions to identify if mothers were having RTW discussions with their prenatal care provider or their infant's healthcare provider, the frequency of such discussions, who initiated such discussions, the degree of usefulness mothers placed on such discussions, and if mothers felt providers should have discussions regarding RTW. Questions about the content of RTW discussions asked whether the discussion focused primarily on: maternal physical health, maternal mental health, child physical health, child development, or “other”. Questions regarding the content of RTW discussions were refined and implemented after beginning baseline interviews. As such, 48.4% of mothers were asked questions about the content of the RTW discussions at the 4 month baseline interview while 51.6% of mothers were asked at the 8 month follow-up interview.

Analyses

Bivariate differences were tested using statistics appropriate for metric and type of variable. Differences in proportions between characteristics of women in our sample vs. women in the county were tested using Z-tests for differences in two proportions. Chi-square tests were used to test associations between two categorical variables, such as having had a RTW discussion with a healthcare provider and maternal education level. Mean comparisons were tested using independent samples t-tests. A backwards stepwise model building procedure with likelihood ratio statistics was used to arrive at the most parsimonious logistic regression model for our outcomes of interest (i.e., having a RTW discussion or not with the mother's prenatal care provider; having a RTW discussion or not with the infant's healthcare provider). All variables with a p-value of < 0.20 in bivariate analyses were advanced to multivariate analysis (20). All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 16.0.2 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

A comparison of the mothers in our study vs. women in the same county (21) is presented in Table 1. The mean age of the mothers in our study was 30.3 years (sd 5.6 years). By design, the racial distribution was well-matched to the county distribution with 30% Black and 70% non-Hispanic white mothers. County-level proportions presented reflect those of women aged 15 – 50 years who had a birth in the past 12 months in Forsyth County, NC (21). In comparison, our study participants were more highly educated than the general population of recent mothers, with 47% having a college degree or higher vs. 22% of women in the county. More women in our study were married (77% vs. 61%, respectively). By design, women in our study were employed full-time, working on average 39.5 hours/week.

Table 1
Comparison of study sample vs. county data.

The majority of women in our study reported receiving their prenatal care from an obstetrician (91.2%). The remainder of the care was provided by family physicians (5.1%), midwives (1.4%), nurse practitioners (0.9%), or “other” (0.9%).

Approximately 60% of study participants reported having had a RTW discussion with their prenatal healthcare providers (Table 2). In bivariate analyses, such discussions were more common among Black mothers (p=0.003), mothers below the poverty threshold (p=0.01), and single mothers (p=0.02). In contrast to mothers using family members or formal daycare arrangements, fewer mothers using “other” childcare arrangements had a RTW discussion with their prenatal care providers (p=0.05) (Table 2). “Other” childcare arrangement typically involved relying on informal babysitters or multiple childcare arrangements. The average length of maternity leave did not differ between those having vs. not having a RTW discussion with a prenatal care provider (62.0 vs. 65.2 days, respectively; p=0.28). Results from a multivariate logistic regression model indicated that Black mothers (OR 2.6; p=0.006) and those meeting the 2007 poverty threshold (OR 3.6; p=0.047) were more likely than non-Hispanic white mothers and those above the poverty threshold, respectively, to have a RTW discussion with their prenatal care provider. Marital status and childcare arrangements were no longer significant in multivariate analysis.

Table 2
Characteristics differentiating working mothers having a return to work (RTW) discussion with their prenatal healthcare provider

Over one-half (57.6%) of study participants reported having a RTW discussion with their infants' healthcare provider. Mothers with a college degree or higher (p<0.0001) and those among the highest income quartiles (p=0.05) more often reported having had a RTW discussion with their infants' healthcare providers (Table 3). Mothers who had a RTW with their infant's healthcare provider reported having a longer maternity leave than those who did not have a RTW discussion with their infant's healthcare provider (66.0 vs. 59.4 days; p=0.03). Trend-level evidence (p < .10) suggested that mothers who exclusively breastfed and those above the 2007 poverty threshold were also more likely to report having had a RTW discussion with their infant's healthcare provider. Maternal education was the only variable that survived multivariate analysis; the odds of having a RTW discussion with the infant's healthcare provider was greater only mothers with a college degree or higher (OR 2.7; p=0.001) in contrast to those with less than a college degree.

Table 3
Characteristics differentiating working mothers having a return to work (RTW) discussion with their infant's healthcare provider

The majority of mothers, 83.4% (181/217), believed that prenatal care providers should discuss returning to work with pregnant women (Table 4). Among those having a RTW discussion with their prenatal care providers, such conversations were typically (61%) initiated by the women, not the healthcare providers. The frequencies of such discussions were as follows: 41.2% had a single discussion, 48.1% had 2-3 discussions and 10.7% had more than 3 discussions; similar data were not collected about the infants' healthcare providers.

Table 4
Characteristics of return to work discussions with prenatal and infant's healthcare provider.

The majority of women having a RTW discussion with their prenatal providers felt the discussion was somewhat useful (39.7%), while 24.4% felt it was very useful and 35.9% felt the discussion was not useful at all. Similarly, the majority of women having a RTW discussion with their infants' healthcare providers felt the discussion was somewhat useful (49.2%) while 29% felt the discussion was very useful and 21.8% felt the discussion was not useful at all (Table 4).

There was substantial variation in the content of women's RTW discussions with healthcare providers (Table 4). The content of nearly half (46.3%) of the RTW discussions with the prenatal healthcare providers focused on neither maternal health and well-being nor infant health or development. Indeed, only 19.5% of mothers had a RTW discussion focused on maternal health (i.e., physical or mental), 10.6% discussed their infants' health or development, while 23.6% discussed both of these topics. The content of RTW discussions with the infant's healthcare provider was more focused. Fully one-third (33.6%) reported that the RTW discussion with their infants' healthcare providers centered on infant health or development, whereas 8.4% of mothers had a discussion about maternal health (i.e., physical or mental) and 22.7% reported discussing both issues relevant to maternal and child health. Slightly more than one-third of RTW discussions (35.3%) with infants' healthcare providers covered neither maternal nor child health.

Discussion

Surprisingly little is known about the patient-provider communication that may occur between a woman and her prenatal care provider or her infant's provider on the subject of returning to full-time employment following the delivery of a child. Despite substantial growth since the 1970s in the percentage of mothers in the labor force, particularly mothers of infants (11), no publications exist addressing this specific patient-provider communication issue. Nichols and Roux (22) suggest that women may not perceive healthcare providers as a source of support or information with respect to their postpartum return to work; however, mothers in their study were not specifically queried about communicating with their providers regarding RTW issues. Although they must be viewed as preliminary given the small sample, the results of our study contribute in several distinct ways to understanding communication patterns regarding returning to work following the birth of a child.

The results of this study reveal that healthcare providers are missing an opportunity to practice patient-centered care since 83.4% of mothers in our sample thought prenatal care providers should talk about RTW as a part of routine prenatal care but only 60% of mothers had these conversations. Such discussions were overall infrequent, with the majority of mothers reporting one to three RTW discussions with their prenatal providers. This suggests that healthcare providers can enhance their patient-centeredness by initiating RTW discussions with employed women receiving prenatal care. Among those having RTW discussions, most conversations did not center on maternal or child health (i.e., “other” was the most frequent content category) and a large proportion found little meaning in the discussions they had. Further research on the content of RTW discussions is necessary to understand the limited meaning mothers placed on RTW discussions. If such discussions centered upon more perfunctory tasks (e.g., obtaining maternity leave paperwork), limited meaning might be anticipated. Based on the broader patient-centered communication literature (1, 5, 6, 23-25), more meaningful RTW discussions may lead to greater patient satisfaction, potentially better medical management of common health conditions (e.g., diabetes, musculoskeletal conditions), and possibly better maternal and infant health outcomes.

An interesting pattern emerged in the women reporting RTW discussions with prenatal versus infants' healthcare providers. Results from a multivariate logistic regression model indicated that the odds of having a RTW discussion with a prenatal healthcare provider were 2.6 times greater for Black than non-Hispanic white women, and 3.6 times greater for women below the poverty threshold than for comparable women living above poverty. By contrast, women who could be considered more advantaged (i.e., those with a college degree or higher) were 2.7 times more likely to have a RTW discussion with their infants' healthcare providers compared to those with less education. This suggests that relatively disadvantaged women are more likely to have RTW discussions with their prenatal care provider, whereas more advantaged women are more likely to have them with their infants' healthcare provider. As only a small proportion of these discussions focused on maternal health and well being or infant health and development, further research is required to identify if the content of the majority of the RTW discussions. Additionally, further study is necessary to determine why over 40% of mothers found such discussions with either their prenatal providers or their infants' providers to be only somewhat useful.

The results of this study make important contributions to the literature; nevertheless, they need to be interpreted in light of their limitations. Although our sample is representative of working mothers in Forsyth County, NC, a racially and ethnically diverse metropolitan area, the results of our study may not generalize to other areas. The majority of mothers in our study received their prenatal care from obstetricians, therefore, results may not generalize to mothers receiving their care from family physicians or midwives. We did not collect data specifically on parity, or the number of children to which a woman has given birth. Parity may affect a woman's perceived need to initiate a RTW discussion with her provider. While we chose to collect data on the number of children cared for in the home, under the presumption that number of dependent children was of primary importance, future research should include both variables. Additionally, our data are based upon maternal self-report which, despite being a practical method to have utilized in the current study, are limited in their ability to capture details about communication when compared to audio- or videotaping clinical encounters. Future studies should rely on more sophisticated measures of patient-provider communication collected in a prospective fashion.

Conclusion

Women want healthcare providers to discuss their return to work. At present, most mothers initiate such discussions and feel that they are only somewhat useful. Providers could enhance their patient-centeredness by initiating RTW discussions but should be aware that race, poverty status, and level of maternal education impact a mother's odds of having a RTW discussion. The task for future scholarship is to develop a more complete understanding of the content and related usefulness of RTW discussions and how such communication impacts maternal and infant health.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (R21 HD48601).

Footnotes

All authors report no potential, perceived, or real competing and/or conflicts of interest.

Preliminary results from this paper were presented at the Conference on Families and Health of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (February 29, 2008; New Orleans, LA)

Note to NIH - Please include: The published version of this article can be accessed on the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine website at: http://www.jabfm.org/cgi/content/full/22/5/498

References

1. Robinson JH, Callister LC, Berry JA, Dearing KA. Patient-centered care and adherence: Definitions and applications to improve outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2008;20(12):600–607. [PubMed]
2. Kidd J, Marteau TM, Robinson S, Ukoumunne OC, Tydeman C. Promoting patient participation in consultations: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of three patient-focused interventions. Patient Education and Counseling. 2004;52(1):107–112. [PubMed]
3. van Dam HA, van der Horst F, van den Borne B, Ryckman R, Crebolder H. Provider-patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patient self-care and outcomes: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2003;51(1):17–28. [PubMed]
4. Alamo MM, Moral RR, Perula de Torres LA. Evaluation of a patient-centred approach in generalized musculoskeletal chronic pain/fibromyalgia patients in primary care. Patient Education and Counseling. 2002;48(1):23–31. [PubMed]
5. Stewart M, B J, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW, Jordan J. The Impact of Patient-Centered Care on Outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(9):796–804. [PubMed]
6. Epstein RM. The Science of Patient-Centered Care. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(9):805–07. [PubMed]
7. Makoul G. Essential Elements of Communication in Medical Encounters: The Kalamazoo Consensus Statement. Acad Med. 2001;76(4):390–393. [PubMed]
8. Smith RC, Marshall-Dorsey AA, Osborn GG, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for teaching patient-centered interviewing. Patient Education and Counseling. 2000;39(1):27–36. [PubMed]
9. Sullivan M. The new subjective medicine: taking the patient's point of view on health care and health. Social Science & Medicine. 2003;56(7):1595–1604. [PubMed]
10. Chao EL, Rones PL, U.S. Department of Labor. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Women in the Labor Force: A Databook. 2007. Report No.: 1002.
11. Johnson TD, U.S. Census Bureau Maternity Leave and Employment Patterns: 2001–2003. Current Population Report. 2007
12. Klumb PL, Lampert T. Women, work, and well-being 1950-2000: a review and methodological critique. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(6):1007–24. [PubMed]
13. Frone MR, Russell M, Cooper ML. Relation of work-family conflict to health outcomes: A four-year longitudinal study of employed parents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 1997;70:325–335.
14. Grzywacz JG. Work-family spillover and health during midlife: Is managing conflict everything? American Journal of Health Promotion. 2000;14:236–243. [PubMed]
15. Grzywacz JG, Bass B. Work, family, and mental health: Testing different models of work-family fit. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2003;65:248–262.
16. Killien MG, Habermann B, Jarrett M. Influence of employment characteristics on postpartum mothers' health. Women Health. 2001;33(12):63–81. [PubMed]
17. Work, Family, Health, and Well-Being initiative. 2006. Retrieved 21 April 2009, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/workhealthinit.cfm.
18. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley; 2000.
19. Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics JR. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 2000;19(6):586–92. [PubMed]
20. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
21. U.S. Census Bureau. American FactFinder. Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/CTGeoSearchByListServlet?ds_name=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_&_lang=en&_ts=249831602697.
22. Nichols MR, Roux GM. Maternal Perspectives on Postpartum Return to the Workplace. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 2004;33(4):463–471. [PubMed]
23. Kinmonth AL, Woodcock A, Griffin S, Spiegal N, Campbell MJ. Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. BMJ. 1998;317(7167):1202–1208. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Piette JD, Schillinger D, Potter MB, Heisler M. Dimensions of patient-provider communication and diabetes self-care in an ethnically diverse population. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):624–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Stewart M. Effective Physician-Patient Communication and Health Outcomes: A Review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152(9):1423–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed]