PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of biolettersThe Royal Society PublishingBiology LettersAboutBrowse By SubjectAlertsFree Trial
 
Biol Lett. 2009 August 23; 5(4): 545–548.
Published online 2009 April 1. doi:  10.1098/rsbl.2009.0150
PMCID: PMC2781917

Foraging segregation between two closely related shearwaters breeding in sympatry

Abstract

Trophic segregation has been proposed as a major mechanism explaining the coexistence of closely related animal taxa. However, how such segregation varies throughout the annual cycle is poorly understood. Here, we examined the feeding ecology of the two subspecies of Cory's shearwater, Calonectris diomedea diomedea and Calonectris diomedea borealis, breeding in sympatry in a Mediterranean colony. To study trophic segregation at different stages, we combined the analysis of isotope values (δ 15N, δ 13C) in blood obtained during incubation and in feathers moulted during chick-rearing and wintering periods with satellite-tracking data during the chick-rearing period. Satellite-tracking and stable isotope data of the first primary feather revealed that C. d. borealis foraged mainly in the Atlantic whereas C. d. diomedea foraged exclusively in the Mediterranean. This spatial segregation could reflect the foraging behaviour of the C. d. borealis individuals before they arrived at the Mediterranean colony. Alternatively, greater wing loading of C. d. borealis individuals may confer the ability to fly across the strong winds occurring at the at the Gibraltar strait. Isotope values of the eighth secondary feather also support segregation in wintering areas between the two forms: C. d. diomedea wintered mainly in association with the Canary current, whereas C. d. borealis wintered in the South African coast. Overall, our results show that spatial segregation in foraging areas can display substantial variation throughout the annual cycle and is probably a major mechanism facilitating coexistence between closely related taxa.

Keywords: feeding ecology, migration, satellite tracking, seabirds, stable isotopes

1. Introduction

Competition between similar species exploiting similar niches is expected to lead to ecological divergence or exclusion (Pianka 2000). However, in some cases, closely related species can coexist (Grant 1975). Partitioning of food resources has been proposed as one of the main mechanisms explaining the coexistence of closely related seabird species (e.g. Weimerskirch et al. 1986). Trophic partitioning among seabird species can operate through habitat segregation or prey segregation within the same habitat (Hyrenbach et al. 2002). The degree of such foraging or dietary segregation among species can also vary seasonally due to different constraints associated with various components of the annual cycle such as breeding or migration. However, despite the importance of understanding mechanisms driving temporal changes in foraging segregation among species, few studies have addressed this question for sympatric species over the annual cycle (González-Solís et al. 2008).

Recent technological developments have provided new tools to study feeding ecology during both breeding and wintering periods. We can currently investigate the foraging ecology of seabirds by using devices to track the movements of birds (e.g. BirdLife International 2004). The analysis of stable isotopes in animal tissues has also been shown to be an effective technique for investigating the feeding habits and trophic segregation among species (Genner et al. 1999; Hobson et al. 2000). In the marine environment, δ 13C and δ 15N values are indicators of the foraging area and trophic levels of consumers, respectively (Inger & Bearhop 2008). Their temporal integration largely depends on the growing or turnover period of the selected tissue (Inger & Bearhop 2008). For example, blood allows the study of trophic habits at different stages of the breeding season, and analysing feathers formed in different seasons allows the study of dietary differences throughout the year (Ramos et al. in press).

Cory's shearwater (Calonectris diomedea) is a migratory seabird genetically and morphologically differentiated into two forms: the Scopoli's, breeding across the Mediterranean and the Atlantic Cory's shearwater, mainly breeding in the northeast Atlantic, although individuals of both forms breed sympatrically in the Mediterranean (Gómez-Díaz et al. 2006). Their taxonomic status is currently being debated and some recent studies have suggested that they should be regarded as different species (Gómez-Díaz et al. in press). Since this debate is not resolved, we will consider them as subspecies, Calonectris diomedea diomedea and Calonectris diomedea borealis, respectively. In addition to differences in size (Gómez-Díaz et al. 2006), individuals from both subspecies breeding allopatrically in the Mediterranean and Atlantic colonies exhibit different migration patterns (González-Solís et al. 2007). Here, we combined analyses of stable isotope in blood obtained during incubation and in feathers moulted during chick-rearing and wintering periods, with satellite-tracking data during the chick-rearing period, to examine the feeding ecology of the two forms of Cory's shearwater breeding in sympatry in a Mediterranean colony. Specifically, our aims were to investigate how the two forms segregate or overlap in their feeding ecology throughout the entire annual cycle.

2. Material and methods

(a) Fieldwork

We conducted this study in the Chafarinas archipelago (35°11′ N; 2°26′ W, southwest-Mediterranean; figure 1) where both subspecies breed in sympatry (Gómez-Díaz et al. in press). During the incubation period of 2001, we took 0.2 ml of blood from 82 individuals for molecular sexing and for stable isotope analyses (trophic habits during incubation period). We also took two feathers from each individual according to its moulting period (Ramos et al. 2009) to analyse δ 15N and δ 13C values, the innermost primary (P1) moulted during the previous chick-rearing period and the eighth secondary (S8) mostly moulted during migration. Moreover, we equipped four C. d. diomedea and three C. d. borealis with 18 g platform terminal transmitters (PTTs) during the chick-rearing period of 2007 (North Star Technology, USA). The high consistency in the foraging behaviour shown for Cory's shearwater (Navarro & González-Solis 2009) suggests that although the number of tracked birds was low, the results were robust and replicable. Subspecies classification of each bird was evaluated using a cluster analysis based on biometric data (see Gómez-Díaz & González-Solís 2007).

Figure 1
Location of the foraging areas that encompassed the 50, 75 and 95% satellite-tracking locations of (a) three C. d. borealis (dots, foraging locations; black, kernel 50%; dark grey, kernel 75%; light grey, kernel 95%) and (b) four C. d. diomedea during ...

(b) Stable isotope and statistical analyses

Stable isotopes of homogenized blood and feathers were analysed by a continuous-flow isotope ratio mass technique using a Europe 20 : 20 mass spectrometer (Europe Scientific, UK). All isotope abundances are expressed in δ-notation as parts per thousand (‰) deviation from standards.

To explore whether subspecies segregated with respect to their stable isotope values throughout the annual cycle (chick rearing, wintering and incubation), we performed generalized linear mixed models for each isotope. Individual identity was treated as a random term using GLIMMIX in the SAS program, and main effect of subspecies and period of the annual cycle (i.e. indicated by blood and different feathers) and their interaction were tested.

PTTs positions were obtained from the Argos system and were filtered following BirdLife International (2004) recommendations; trip distance covered, trip duration and foraging range were calculated. Foraging ground was defined using kernels of 50, 75 and 95 per cent of positions. Effect of subspecies status on trip descriptors was tested by general linear models.

3. Results

(a) Stable isotopes

From the 82 sampled individuals, 64 were classified as C. d. diomedea and 18 as C. d. borealis according to their morphology. Considering δ 15N and δ 13C values as explanatory variables, we obtained two models that included the significant effect of period of the year (δ 15N: F 2,137=93.52, p<0.0001; δ 13C: F 2,137=154.12, p<0.0001) and the interaction between period of the year and subspecies (δ 15N: F 2,137=6.81, p=0.001; δ 13C: F 2,137=6.42, p=0.002), after controlling for the random effect of individual identity (δ 15N: Z=0.9; p=0.18; δ 13C: Z=1.77, p=0.04). These models explained 65.1 and 76.3 per cent of the initial deviance for δ 15N and δ 13C values, respectively. Individuals of both subspecies showed similar blood δ 15N and δ 13C values during incubation (ANOVA, all p>0.4). During the chick-rearing period (P1), C. d. borealis individuals had higher δ 15N and δ 13C values than individuals classified as C. d. diomedea, but these differences were significant only for δ 15N (F 1,82=8.1, p=0.006). Both subspecies differed in their δ 15N (F 1,81=6.3, p=0.05, not significant; figure 2) and δ 13C (F 1,82=6.2, p=0.01; figure 2) values during wintering (S8).

Figure 2
δ 15N and δ 13C values (±s.e.) for 64 C. d. diomedea (white symbols) and 18 C. d. borealis (black symbols) individuals through the annual period; blood (incubation period of 2001). P1, first primary feather moulted at the end ...

(b) Foraging movements

The three satellite-tracked C. d. borealis foraged mainly in the Atlantic, crossing the Gibraltar Strait. By contrast, the four satellite-tracked C. d. diomedea foraged exclusively in the Mediterranean, close to the breeding colony (figure 1). Trips conducted by C. d. borealis were longer, although differences were not significant (C. d. diomedea=3.17±2.55 days, C. d. borealis=6.43±2.81 days; F 1,8=4.0, p=0.08). However, C. d. borealis showed a higher foraging range (C. d. diomedea=73.96±55.96 km, C. d. borealis=440.66±316.47 km; F 1,8=5.8, p=0.04) and the trip distance covered (C. d. diomedea=249.98±201.73 km, C. d. borealis=1102.77±633.22 km; F 1,8=8.3, p=0.02).

4. Discussion

Although breeding in sympatry, segregation in feeding ecology between the two seabird subspecies, C. d. diomedea and C. d. borealis, occurred during the chick-rearing and wintering periods. By contrast, similar blood δ 15N and δ 13C values during the incubation period reported between both Cory's shearwater subspecies suggested similar feeding habits through this period. Since the incubation routine in petrels depends on relief by the partner, males and females of both subspecies need to forage relatively close to the breeding colony (Warham 1990). During the chick-rearing period, both satellite-tracking data and stable isotope values from the P1 (moulted during chick-rearing period, Ramos et al. 2009) revealed a spatial segregation in foraging areas between subspecies. We found that all satellite-tracked individuals of C. d. diomedea foraged exclusively in proximity to the breeding colony in the Mediterranean waters, whereas satellite-tracked individuals of C. d. borealis mainly foraged in the Atlantic waters. Similarly, greater δ 15N signatures in P1 of C. d. borealis probably reflected the greater δ 15N signatures at the base of the Atlantic food web compared with lower values of the Mediterranean food web (Pantoja et al. 2002).

So, what mechanism leads to the spatial segregation in foraging during chick rearing? Two complementary explanations could explain this behaviour. Cory's shearwaters, similar to other pelagic seabirds, learn where and when their pelagic prey are distributed within their foraging range and may return consistently to specific feeding areas (Weimerskirch 2007; Navarro & González-Solis 2009). Individuals of C. d. borealis could have arrived in the Mediterranean Sea from the nearby Atlantic colonies, where they probably foraged in the Atlantic waters. After moving to the Chafarinas Islands, they may have remained faithful to their previous foraging area. Supporting this hypothesis, one satellite-tracked C. d. borealis foraged close to a potential population source: Berlengas Island, where about 250 pairs breed (figure 1, Granadeiro 1991). Alternatively, foraging movements of shearwaters may have been mediated by the strength and direction of winds, since seabirds with greater wing loading can cope with stronger winds (Suryan et al. 2009). Calonectris diomedea borealis are larger (Gómez-Díaz et al. 2006) and show greater wing loading compared with C. d. diomedea (J. Navarro 2008, unpublished data), and therefore are probably better prepared to fly into the strong winds flowing across the Gibraltar strait.

Similarly to P1, we found a significant difference between subspecies in the isotopic values in S8 (moulted during migration, Ramos et al. 2009), also suggesting spatial segregation between the subspecies in winter. It is known that, while both subspecies winter on the South African coast, C. d. diomedea also winters associated with the Canary current (González-Solís et al. 2007). Consequently, the observed differences in the δ 15N and δ 13C values of the S8 between both subspecies probably indicate this spatial segregation in the winter areas (Ramos et al. in press). Indeed, feather signatures of Cape gannets (Morus capensis) breeding in South Africa are similar to those of C. d. borealis, whereas signatures from Cape Verde shearwaters (Calonectris edwardsii) in the P1, moulted on the southern Canary current, are similar to the values of C. d. diomedea (figure 2). However, the S8 signatures from C. d. diomedea showed more variability than C. d. borealis probably because a few C. d. diomedea also used the South Africa coast as a secondary wintering area (González-Solís et al. 2007).

In summary, this study reveals for the first time, to our knowledge, the segregation in the feeding ecology and foraging areas during chick-rearing and wintering periods between two closely related shearwaters, C. d. diomedea and C. d. borealis, breeding sympatrically in the Mediterranean. Our results are in line with other studies on feeding segregation in different species inhabiting freshwater (e.g. closely related fish species living sympatrically in continental lakes, Genner et al. 1999; and terrestrial, e.g. bear species inhabiting colder regions, Hobson et al. 2000) environments. This therefore highlights the value of stable isotope analyses to address feeding segregation and coexistence of closely related taxa breeding sympatrically. More investigations are now required to improve our knowledge of the consequences of the use of different wintering or foraging areas for adult and chick survival.

Acknowledgements

All methodology was conducted following the ethical rules from the Spanish Government.

We extend special thanks to I. Afán, V. García-Matarranz, J. Torrent and G. Martínez for their fieldwork support; J. Zapata (OAPN) for his institutional support; P. Arcos, R. Ramos and four referees who contributed to improve previous drafts. A. Ruiz and J. M. Sanchez (SEO/BirdLife) provided PTT data. Junta de Andalucía and SEO/BirdLife LIFE-Project LIFE04NAT/ES/000049 provided financial support.

References

  • BirdLife International Tracking ocean wanderers: the global distribution of albatrosses and petrels. Results from the Global Procellariiform Tracking Workshop, 1–5 September, 2003, Gordon's Bay, South Africa. 2004. Cambridge, UK:BirdLife International
  • Genner M.J., Turner G.F., Barker S., Hawkins S.J. 1999. Niche segregation among Lake Malawi cichlid fishes? Evidence from stable isotope signatures. Ecol. Lett 2, 15–190doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00068.x
  • Gómez-Díaz E., González-Solís J. 2007. Geographic assignment of seabirds to their origin: combining morphologic, genetic, and biochemical analyses. Ecol. Appl 17, 1484–1498doi:10.1890/06-1232.1 [PubMed]
  • Gómez-Díaz E., González-Solís J., Peinado M.A., Page R.D.M. 2006. Phylogeography of the Calonectris shearwaters using molecular and morphometric data. Mol. Phyl. Evol 41, 322–332doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.05.006 [PubMed]
  • Gómez-Díaz E., González-Solís J., Peinado M. A. In press.Population structure in a highly pelagic seabird, the Cory's shearwater (Calonectris diomedea): an examination of genetics, morphology and ecology. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. (doi:10.3354/meps07974)
  • González-Solís J., Croxall J.P., Oro D., Ruiz X. 2007. Trans-equatorial migration and mixing in the wintering areas of a pelagic seabird. Front. Ecol. Environ 5, 297–301doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[297:TMAMIT]2.0.CO;2
  • González-Solís J., Croxall J.P., Afanasyev V. 2008. Offshore spatial segregation in giant petrels Macronectes spp.: differences between species, sexes and seasons. Aq. Cons. Mar. Fresh. Ecos 17, 22–36doi:10.1002/aqc.911
  • Granadeiro J.P. 1991. The breeding biology of Cory's shearwater Calonectris diomedea on Berlengas Island, Portugal. Seabird 13, 30–39
  • Grant P.R. 1975. The classical case of character displacement. Evol. Biol 8, 237–337
  • Hobson K.A., McLellan B.N., Woods J.G. 2000. Using stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotopes to infer trophic relationships among black and grizzly bears in the upper Columbia River basin, British Columbia. Can. J. Zool 78, 1332–1339doi:10.1139/cjz-78-8-1332
  • Hyrenbach K.D., Fernández P., Anderson D.J. 2002. Oceanographic habitats of two sympatric North Pacific albatrosses during the breeding season. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser 233, 283–301doi:10.3354/meps233283
  • Inger R., Bearhop S. 2008. Applications of stable isotope analyses to avian ecology. Ibis 149, 622–625
  • Jaquemet S., McQuaid C. 2008. Stable isotope ratios in Cape gannet around the southern coasts of Africa reveal penetration of biogeographic patterns in oceanic signatures. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci 80, 374–380doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.08.019
  • Navarro J., González-Solís J. 2009. Environmental determinants of foraging strategies in Cory's shearwaters Calonectris diomedea Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 378, 259–267 (doi:10.3354/meps07880)
  • Pantoja S., Repeta D.J., Sachs J.P., Sigman D.M. 2002. Stable isotope constraints on the nitrogen cycle of the Mediterranean Sea water column. Deep Sea Res. I 49, 1609–1621doi:10.1016/S0967-0637(02)00066-3
  • Pianka E.R. Evolutionary ecology. 2000. San Francisco, CA:Addison Wesley
  • Ramos R., Militão T., González-Solís J., Ruiz X. 2009. Moulting strategies of a long-distance migratory seabird: the Mediterranean Cory's shearwater Calonectris d. diomedea. Ibis 151, 151–159doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00877.x
  • Ramos R., González-Solís J., Ruiz X. Linking isotopic and migratory patterns in a pelagic seabird. Oecologia In press. [PubMed]
  • Suryan R.M., et al. 2009. Wind, waves, and wing loading: morphological specialization may limit range expansion of endangered albatrosses. PLoS ONE 3, e4016.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004016 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Warham J. The petrels: their ecology and breeding systems. 1990. London, UK:Academic Press
  • Weimerskirch H. 2007. Are seabirds foraging for unpredictable resources?. Deep Sea Res. II 54, 211–223doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.11.013
  • Weimerskirch H., Jouventin P., Stahl J.C. 1986. Comparative ecology of the six albatross breeding on the Crozet islands. Ibis 128, 195–213doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1986.tb02669.x

Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society