AMPK is an heterotrimeric enzyme composed of a catalytic α-subunit and regulatory β and γ subunits. The α and β-subunits each exist in two isoforms (α1; α2 and β1; β2), and the γ subunit in 3 isoforms (γ 1; γ 2 and γ3). The γ subunit contains two pairs of Bateman (CBS) domains that bind AMP and ATP. According to recent findings, based on the crystal structure of the γ subunit it has been suggested that two sites bind either AMP or ATP, whereas a third site contains a tightly bound AMP that does not exchange [
222]. Furthermore, under conditions in which the cell’s energy state is not depressed, it is believed that ATP is predominantly bound to the two Bateman domains and that most AMPK molecules are inactive [
222].
Physiological activation of AMPK occurs in skeletal muscle during exercise in response to increased binding of AMP and decreased binding of ATP to the γ subunit (). Exercise can be characterized by a large (>100 fold) increase in muscle energy turnover and by alterations in nucleotide status. Although ADP is the direct product of the hydrolysis of ATP during muscle contraction, it is rapidly converted to AMP via the adenylate kinase reaction (). This in turn leads to large increases in AMP concentration dependent on the intensity and duration of the exercise (181), even though free cytosolic AMP is buffered by protein binding and deamination to IMP [
197]. In contrast, ATP concentrations change little during exercise, unless the exercise is very intense. AMP activates AMPK and ATP antagonizes this effect. Therefore, as already noted, it is the ratio between AMP and ATP that is of importance for AMPK activation [
61]. AMP binding to the Bateman domains can stimulate AMPK allosterically, but apparently this only has a moderate activating effect (<10 -fold)[
18]. More importantly, AMP binding leads to increased AMPK phosphorylation at Thr 172 of the α-subunit which can enhance AMPK activity more than 100-fold [
62]. The importance of an increase in the AMP/ATP ratio in mediating AMPK phosphorylation during exercise is underscored by the fact that it is impaired in adenylate kinase deficient mice in which AMP generation is decreased during muscle contractions [
58]. The mechanisms by which AMP activates AMPK have been challenged recently. Previous observations suggested that AMP binding to the Bateman domains of the γ-subunit of AMPK, in addition to allosterically activating AMPK, make it a much better substrate for upstream AMPK kinases and a poorer substrate for phosphatases [
61]. More recent studies, however, suggest that the major effect of AMP binding to AMPK is to inhibit the action of phosphatases, [
176;
186]. According to this scheme, the major upstream kinase of AMPK, LKB-1 is constitutively active in muscle and in the basal state AMPK is continuously phosphorylated and dephosphorylated in a futile cycle. Although this may seem energetically wasteful, the energy cost of this cycling is quantitatively negligible and it allows for greater and more rapid changes in the phosphorylation status and activity of AMPK in response to various stimuli.
LKB1
has been identified as an important upstream AMPK kinase in muscle and most other cells [
63;
221]. Its importance during electrically-induced muscle contractions has been demonstrated by the severely blunted activation of AMPKα2 and ACCβ phosphorylation in muscle-specific LKB-1 KO mice [
96;
174]. Interestingly, AMPKα1 activation was less affected [
96;
174]. In addition, exercise capacity in LKB-1 KO mice is markedly impaired compared to WT mice [
193]. Although there is ample evidence for the importance of LKB-1 for AMPK activation in muscle, the activity of LKB-1 does not appear to be increased in muscle during exercise [
74;
174], supporting the notion that it is constitutively active.
CAMKK, TAK-1 and SIRT1
Although LKB1 is the predominant AMPK kinase in most cells, a Ca
2+-dependent CAMKKβ has been found to phosphorylate AMPK at T172 in brain, endothelium and lymphocytes [
64;
220]. Recently, it has been reported that CaMKK may also act as an upstream AMPK kinase early during contractions in skeletal muscle [
78] and that CaMKKα may be the important isoform in muscle [
212],in contrast to other tissues in which CaMKKβ seems to be the dominant isoform [
64;
220]. Also of note, when the intracellular Ca
++-concentration was increased in skeletal muscle by incubation with caffeine, it resulted in increased AMPK activity, primarily due to activation and phosphorylation of α1-AMPK [
77]. Although definitive genetic studies are lacking, collectively these observation suggest that CaMKK in fact acts as an upstream AMPK kinase in skeletal muscle, perhaps mainly for α1-AMPK. They also suggest that an intensity- and/or time-dependent switch may occur in the relative importance of AMPKKs during contraction.
Another potentially relevant enzyme that has been studied in cultured cardiomyocytes, is the mitogen activated, TAK-1 (TGFbeta-activated protein kinase). It has been suggested that TAK1 is either a LKB-1 regulating kinase or a functional AMPK kinase [
223]. Its possible role in skeletal muscle is not known.
Recently it has been suggested that silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1), a NAD+ dependent histone/protein deacetylase that has been linked to increased longevity caused by calorie restriction [
120] may be able to deacetylate LKB-1 leading to its activation and that of AMPK in HEK293T cells and rat liver, in vivo [
108]. The relevance of such a mechanism to AMPK activation in skeletal muscle under various conditions including exercise has not been systematically examined. However, recent studies have indicated that SIRT1 expression is increased after both a single prolonged bout of exercise [
187] as well as after physical training [
40]. Likewise, increases in SIRT1 mRNA have been observed in human muscle after 6 months of caloric restriction either with or without concomitant regular exercise [
23]. Thus, it is conceivable that under certain conditions exercise may also affect LKB-1 activity in skeletal muscle and perhaps other tissues via SIRT1-induced deacetylation.
The above described mechanisms for activation of AMPK in muscle during exercise are directly related to the increase in sarcoplasmic calcium concentration and the ensuing metabolic perturbations (e.g increased AMP/ATP ratio) caused by the contractile activity (). However, there may be additional mechanisms that increase AMPK activity in contracting muscle. For instance, increases in AMPK activity in muscle and adipose tissue caused by swimming is decreased in IL-6 KO mice [
89;
168] suggesting that IL-6, which is synthesized and released by the muscle cell during sustained exercise, may be involved in AMPK activation in various tissues. Also, in keeping with this notion, it has been shown that AMPK activation in the vastus lateralis muscle of humans correlates closely with IL-6 release from the leg during ergometer cycling [
113].
Exercise intensity and heterotrimeric complexes
AMPK is activated in an intensity-dependent manner, such that its activation is observed acutely at exercise intensities above ≈ 60% of maximal aerobic capacity [
21;
128;
141;
185;
215;
218]. On the other hand, AMPK activation can also be observed if exercise at a lower intensity is very prolonged [
216].
Recent findings in humans indicate that the various trimeric AMPK complexes are activated very differently during exercise. Thus, in human muscle only 3 heterotrimeric AMPK complexes are expressed: α1β2γ1, α2β2γ1 and α2β2γ3 and during intense exercise of up to 20 min duration only the α2β2γ3 complex is activated. The other complexes, which comprise as much as 80% of the total AMPK pool are unchanged or even decreased in activity [
9]. Only after moderate intensity exercise of 60 min or more does the activity of the α2β2γ1 complex increase [
194]. Interestingly, increases in the activity of α2β2γ3 correlated well with increased ACCβ phosphorylation suggesting that this trimeric complex plays a major role in the regulation of fatty acid oxidation [
194]. In contrast, increases in the activity of the α2β2γ1 complex were shown to correlate with phosphorylation of the rab-gap protein AS160, an AMPK target that has been linked to the regulation of glucose transport [
103;
196]. Collectively, these findings suggest both that the regulation of the various trimeric complexes in muscle during exercise is very different and that the complexes have different downstream substrates and probably distinct biological actions.
AMPK regulation and glycogen content
In addition to exercise intensity, the magnitude of AMPK activation during exercise also depends on the content of glycogen in muscle (). When muscle glycogen is low, AMPK activity is elevated at rest and it increases significantly more during exercise than when glycogen is high [
31;
162;
184;
214]. This dependency on glycogen content is also apparent when AMPK is activated by AICAR [
81;
213]. Interestingly, AMPK has a glycogen binding domain on its β-subunit. Although glycogen binding to this domain has not yet been demonstrated to alter AMPK activity
in vitro [
73;
146]; as mentioned above, studies in vivo strongly suggest that glycogen- directly or indirectly- inhibits AMPK activity.
Differences between men and women
Interestingly, AMPK activation during physical activity is less in women than in men when exercising at the same relative exercise intensity [
161]. This is likely because women are less metabolically stressed as indicated by nucleotide status [
161], possibly due to the fact that they have both a higher percentage of oxidative type I muscle fibers [
182] and a greater capillary density [
161] than men. Although not studied, it would seem likely that at maximal exercise intensity, women and men would be equally stressed and presumably would have the same AMPK activation.
Metabolic effects of AMPK in muscle during exercise
Glucose uptake Activation of AMPK by AICAR in resting muscle results in increased glucose uptake [
119], an effect that is lost when α2 or γ3-AMPK expression is deficient [
5;
85;
126]. Thus, it is logical to assume that AMPK activation during exercise is responsible for the observed increase in muscle glucose uptake (). Supportive evidence for this conclusion has been obtained in mice with various deficiencies in AMPK activity, including AMPK α1 and α2 and γ3 whole body KO mice, muscle specific LKB1 KO mice and transgenic mice overexpressing dominant negative AMPK constructs in muscle as discussed below. The picture is not clear, because a partial deficiency of AMPK, such as occurs in germline α2 AMPK KO [
85] and γ3 KO mice [
5] is associated with a normal rate of glucose uptake during contractions [
85]. In contrast, in mice overexpressing a dominant negative α2AMPK construct in muscle [
47;
79;
126;
179] and in the muscle specific LKB1 KO mice in which α2 AMPK activation is completely blunted [
96;
175] glucose uptake in muscle during electrical stimulation is impaired. In α1 AMPK KO mice, glucose uptake during twitch contractions was recently shown to be decreased compared to wild type [
80], in agreement with previous studies in which a modest decrease in glucose uptake during tetanic contractions was observed in the soleus muscle of α1 AMPK KO mice [
85]. Taken together, the available data indicate that AMPK partially mediates the increase in glucose uptake during electrical stimulation of muscle. To date all of these experiments have been performed with muscles in which contraction was induced by electrical stimulation in vitro or in situ via the sciatic nerve. It does not automatically follow that the same results would be obtained during voluntary exercise in vivo during which the muscle recruitment pattern is very different and the systemic response to exercise has to be taken into account.
AMPK belongs to a family of AMPK related kinases (ARKS), all of which are activated by LKB-1. Although several of these ARKS (QSK, QIK, MARK2/3, and MARK4) do not appear to be activated during electrically-induced muscle contractions [
173], it was recently reported in a preliminary communication that expression of a phosphorylation impaired mutant AMPK- related kinase, SNARK (NUAK2), blunts electrically stimulated contraction-induced glucose uptake [
95].
In recent years a direct target of Akt termed “Akt Substrate of 160 kDa” (AS160) has been implicated in insulin-mediated GLUT4 translocation and glucose uptake in both adipocytes and skeletal muscle [
104;
177]. It has been suggested that AS160 is also involved in the regulation of glucose transport during contraction/exercise, since it has been found to be an AMPK target in contracting muscle [
104;
196] (). In addition. mutations in AS160 that prevent it from being phosphorylated decrease muscle glucose uptake during contractions [
104]. Although these observations suggest an important role for AS160 in contraction induced glucose uptake, increased muscle AS160 phosphorylation has not been observed in human muscle until after 60 min of exercise, suggesting that it may not be an initiating event [
32;
195]. Furthermore, recent data in incubated rat muscle showed that AS160 phosphorylation is transient despite maintained glucose uptake during 60 min of electrical stimulation [
50]. To date, 8 phosphorylation sites have been identified in AS160 [
53]. Since the antibody (PAS) that has been used to detect phosphorylation of AS160 may bind to several but not all of these sites, the possibility exists that AS160 is phosphorylated on sites that are important for exercise induced glucose transport but are not detected by the PAS antibody. Site specific phosphospecific antibodies will be needed to address this issue. Recently, another Akt target Tbc1d1 has been shown to be expressed heavily in muscle and seems to be involved in insulin stimulated glucose uptake [
158;
190]. It is also phosphorylated during muscle contraction [
50;
190], but whether it is involved in regulating contraction-stimulated glucose uptake remains to be seen.
Fatty acid oxidation In parallel to its effects on glucose uptake, AICAR increases fatty acid oxidation in resting skeletal muscle [
119] and in part for this reason AMPK activation has been thought to participate in the regulation of fatty acids during exercise. Whole-body and muscle fatty acid oxidation increase during exercise () and in particular sustained exercise of moderate intensity [
22]. However, in contrast to glucose oxidation, which increases with increasing exercise intensity [
166], whole body fatty acid oxidation seems to plateau at around 60% of maximal aerobic capacity and at higher intensities it then decreases [
202]. On the other hand, recent evidence suggests that when fatty acid uptake and oxidation are measured directly across a relatively small muscle group such as the vastus lateralis, fatty acid oxidation is not decreased at high exercise intensities [
65] suggesting that that whole-body data do not accurately reflect local muscle metabolism.
In rodents, exercise and electrically-induced muscle contractions decrease the concentration of malonyl CoA in muscle [
141;
171;
210] presumably due to the phosphorylation and inhibition by AMPK of ACC2, the ACC isoform which catalyzes the synthesis of the pool of malonylCoA that inhibits carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT1) [
15;
118]. Also, the phosphorylation and activation of malonyl CoA decarboxylase by AMPK and perhaps other factors operative during exercise could enhance this effect [
171]. Initial studies failed to find decreases in muscle malonyl CoA during exercise in humans [
133;
134]; however, more recent studies have described modest decreases in its concentration in human muscle both after acute exercise [
29;
160] and physical training [
107]. Although AMPK activation and the ensuing decrease in malonyl CoA concentration in muscle may be an important mediator of the increase in muscle fatty acid oxidation during the transition from rest to exercise, it does not seem to play a key regulatory role during exercise. Thus, during exercise of increasing intensity muscle, AMPK activity increases [
218], but as mentioned above, whole body fatty acid oxidation decreases [
202] or remains stable when measured across an exercising muscle [
65]. Furthermore, when muscle glycogen stores are decreased prior to exercise, muscle lipid oxidation is greater than when exercise is performed by muscle with full glycogen stores but malonyl CoA concentrations are similar [
160]. Recent studies in mice overexpressing a kinase dead α2 AMPK construct in heart and skeletal muscle showed that both during
in vitro electrical stimulation of muscle and during
in vivo exercise impaired AMPK signalling was not accompanied by decreased fatty acid oxidation [
36]. Data obtained in perfused rat skeletal muscle has suggested an important role for Ca
++ signalling and ERK activation in regulating fatty acid uptake and oxidation during electrically-induced muscle contractions [
151;
152]. Thus, fine tuning of lipid oxidation may not be provided by AMPK. Other studies suggest that such fine tuning takes place at the level of carnitine availability, which like AMPK is regulated by exercise intensity and carbohydrate availability [
160;
172]. A low level of free carnitine in muscle limits the possibility for CPT1 catalyzed conversion of long chain fatty acids to fatty acylcarnitines in which form they can enter the mitochondria for oxidation.
AMPK activation during exercise may also decrease triglyceride synthesis in adipose tissue and liver by inhibiting the enzyme sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) [
127;
141]. In addition, activation of AMPK in isolated cardiomyocytes results in translocation of the putative fatty acid transporter FAT/CD36 to the cell membrane which could increase fatty acid uptake as well as its oxidation [
57]. In keeping with this possibility, AMPK stimulation in resting muscle has been shown to increase fatty acid oxidation in a CD36 dependent manner [
12]. Thus, it appears that AMPK activation during exercise affects multiple enzymes and other molecules to increase the uptake as well as the oxidation of fatty acids.
Protein synthesis Protein synthesis is markedly diminished in skeletal muscle during contraction [
17;
35;
154] (). It has been proposed that AMPK activation inhibits protein synthesis in liver and ischemic heart muscle by activating of eEF2kinase leading to increased eEF2 phosphorylation and inhibition of peptide elongation [
69;
70]. Inhibition of peptide elongation in muscle during exercise has also been suggested by the finding of a rapid increase in eEF2 phosphorylation at the onset of bicycle ergometer exercise [
165]. This appears to precede an increase in AMPK activity and is probably rather due to Ca
++- dependent CaMKIII (eEF2 kinase) activation [
165]. Interestingly, immediately following strength training an increased eEF2 phosphorylation has not been observed [
30;
35]. The reason for the different responses after endurance exercise and strength training is unclear. In addition to inhibition of peptide elongation, translation initiation may also be inhibited during exercise since decreased phosphorylation of 4E BP1 in muscle has been described both during resistance exercise training [
30;
35] and endurance exercise [
164], perhaps due to increased α2 AMPK activity and TSC2 phosphorylation ().
In contrast to the inhibition of protein synthesis during exercise, after a bout of exercise, protein synthesis is typically increased [
35;
155] (as is glycogen synthesis) despite persistent increases in AMPK activity [
35], casting doubt about the primacy of AMPK in regulating protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle in this situation. In rodents and humans the sensitivity to insulin of several metabolic pathways, including protein [
8] and glycogen synthesis [
156] amino acid transport [
227] and glucose uptake [
156;
157] are increased after exercise, and perhaps this compensates for the increase in AMPK activity. In agreement with this interpretation, it has recently been shown that elements of the molecular pathway controlling peptide elongation are increased during insulin stimulation 4 hours after one-legged endurance exercise, compared to the non-exercised control leg [
45].
Decreased running performance in AMPK deficient mouse muscle
Although it has been difficult to pinpoint defects in substrate metabolism, there is no doubt that mice with defects in AMPK activation, such as muscle specific kinase dead mice [
49;
125], α2 AMPK germ line KO mice [
82] and LKB-1 muscle specific KO mice [
192], have poor running capacity
in vivo and disturbed nucleotide levels in muscle during exercise/contraction [
49;
82;
86;
93;
175]. Thus, a partial absence of AMPK in muscle somehow results in poor exercise performance. The reason for this is not immediately obvious, but could be related to decreased mitochondrial capacity in the muscles of these mice rather than to an acute effect on metabolic regulation [
49;
84;
93;
192]. Studies of substrate metabolism during running in these genetic mouse models have not been reported. The possibility that decreased running performance in these mice is the result of decreased cardiac performance during exercise also cannot be excluded, since the genetic abnormalities in these mice also target the heart. On the other hand, this possibility seems less likely since heart specific AMPK DN mice appear to have a normal exercise capacity [
129].