|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Understanding the characteristics of Chinese American smokers with medical conditions and factors associated with their tobacco-use behaviors will guide effective cessation programs. In 2008, the authors described socio-demographic profiles of Chinese smokers with medical conditions treated during the period 2002–2006, documented their tobacco-use behaviors (i.e., average daily cigarette use, nicotine dependence, and number of past-year quit attempts), and drew comparisons between subjects recruited from hospitals (IP) and ambulatory settings (OP). Compared to OP, IP were significantly older, less educated, less acculturated, and more likely to be retired. Of the two groups, IP had poorer disease profiles, smoked less (4.4 vs. 11.9 cigarettes per day), and had lower nicotine-addiction scores (5.5 vs. 6.7). There was no difference between groups in past-year quit attempts. After adjustments, the data revealed that being employed and OP was associated with higher average daily cigarette use; IP were less nicotine dependent than OP; and for both groups, years of smoking was negatively associated with past-year quit attempts. Our study suggests that, more than acculturation level, health status influences the Chinese smoker’s level of cigarette use and nicotine addiction. Given the severity of their disease profiles, IP should be aggressively targeted for intervention, as they are more likely to be light smokers and to be less nicotine dependent than OP. Future tobacco treatment studies should pay attention to health status among smokers in health-care settings in order to provide a more accurate assessment of treatment needs and of barriers to successful smoking cessation.
Cigarette smoking is one of the leading causes of death in the United States (US) . Among Chinese Americans, cardiovascular disease and cancer account for more than 65% of all deaths . Despite health concerns associated with cigarette smoking, relatively little is known about tobacco-use behaviors among Chinese American smokers in health-care settings. Former smokers frequently cite health concerns or major illnesses as their reasons for quitting [3, 4]. This finding, coupled with reports that nearly half of Chinese Americans surveyed cited doctors as useful and trusted sources of health information, suggests that health-care settings are potentially important venues for providing smoking-cessation treatment and intervention for Chinese smokers .
Studies find that shifts in tobacco-use behaviors among Chinese American smokers occur with adaptation to US culture [5–11]. Immigrants are more likely to be current smokers; alternatively, greater acculturation, as measured by English-language proficiency, has been associated with less-frequent smoking among Chinese men [11, 12]. In terms of quit attempts, foreign-born Chinese smokers are less likely to have tried to quit smoking than US born Chinese (59 vs. 69%) . Acculturation, measured by language preference and length of time in the US, also influences quitting behavior . With the exception of a study that found no difference in health status between former and current smokers , population-based studies have failed to examine the effects of ill health on tobacco use among Chinese American smokers.
By some estimates, light smoking (fewer than ten cigarettes per day) has increased by 29% in California. Light smoking is high among ethnic minorities, including Asian Americans . Available data suggests that health status may affect patterns of tobacco use and quitting behavior, especially for light smokers [14, 15]. Non-daily smokers try to quit more often than daily smokers, and, compared to daily smokers, are more likely to try again within 6 months of a failed attempt . Although non-daily smokers report better health than daily smokers, non-daily smokers report more symptoms of ill health, higher alcohol use, more missed work days, and more visits to hospital emergency rooms than those who have never smoked. The paucity of information about factors affecting cessation in the Chinese American population undermines efforts to guide the delivery of effective cessation programs in health-care settings. Maximizing tobacco control requires an understanding of the specific characteristics of Chinese American smokers and the factors associated with Chinese American tobacco-use behaviors.
The purpose of our study was to describe tobacco-use behaviors among a sample of Chinese American smokers with medical conditions, and to examine the associations between patterns of tobacco use and health status by comparing smokers from hospitals (IP) with those from ambulatory settings (OP). We hypothesized that the number of cigarettes smoked daily would be lower among IP participants, and that IP nicotine-addiction scores and past-year quit attempts would be higher than those for OP. We concluded that health-care providers need a better understanding of patterns of tobacco-use behaviors among smokers with medical conditions in order to guide their treatment decisions. Better treatment decisions, in turn, increase the likelihood that this vulnerable segment of smokers will successfully quit smoking.
The study was part of a baseline assessment from a community-based, culturally tailored, randomized smoking-cessation clinical trial, the Chinese Community Smoking Cessation Project (CCSCP) . From November 2002 to August 2006, smokers were recruited from eight hospitals (one public, one university, two affiliated with a health maintenance organization [HMO], and four private hospitals); six ambulatory clinics (two HMO-affiliated and four community health centers) and through media outreach (e.g., posters and radio announcements in the San Francisco Bay Area). California has a large Asian population (4.2 million); in the San Francisco Bay Area, Chinese are the largest Asian subgroup, comprising 36% of all local Asian Americans. Recruitment efforts were primarily focused on neighborhoods with a large Chinese American population. All participating clinics and health centers included Chinese-speaking health-care providers.
Eligibility criteria required that participants: (a) were aged 18 years or older; (b) self-identified as Chinese; (c) had smoked tobacco within the past 3 months; (d) spoke Chinese or English; (e) lived within the San Francisco Bay Area; (f) were not currently engaged in assisted smoking-cessation efforts; and (g) had a current medical condition. Exclusion criteria were: (a) inability to read and speak English or Chinese; (b) a medically unstable condition; (c) cognitive impairment; and (d) addiction to alcohol or other recreational drugs. A total of 464 participants enrolled in the study.
Physicians and medical records verified the primary diagnoses of participants recruited by research nurses from hospitals and clinics. Participants recruited through media outreach (N = 78) reported their own primary diagnoses. When participants had more than 1 medical diagnosis, the principal investigator (a medical doctor) and 3 research staff (a foreign-trained medical doctor, a master level registered nurse, and a nurse-practitioner) determined that the primary diagnosis was that which was most critical and/or tobacco-related.
Data collection consisted of structured in-person interviews conducted by five trained, bilingual research nurses and/or health educators. The instruments were culturally and linguistically adapted, tested on focus groups, and reviewed by community advisors. The study protocol and consent forms were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Committee on Human Research, University of California at San Francisco, and by the IRB at each hospital and clinic site. Participants had the option of being interviewed in Mandarin, Cantonese, Toisanese, or English. Participants were paid $40 each for interviews.
Socio-demographics. We obtained personal information about participants’ age, gender, employment status, education, marital status, household income, birthplace, and indicators of acculturation, including number of years in the US, language preference, and English-language fluency.
Acculturation. To indicate level of acculturation, we calculated a score based on length of stay in the US, language preference, and English fluency. Length of stay was coded as 0 (5 years or less), 1 (6–15 years), and 2 (16 or more years). For language preference, a score of 1 was given if the preferred language was English; other language preferences were scored 0. English language fluency was coded as 0 (not fluent), 1 (somewhat fluent), and 2 (extremely fluent). These variables were totaled to produce a sum score. The resultant acculturation score ranged from 0 (not acculturated) to 5 (extremely acculturated).
Tobacco use. Participants were asked the age at which they smoked their first cigarette, and the age at which they became a regular smoker. They were asked the number of years they had smoked regularly, number of serious attempts they had made to quit in the preceding 12 months, number of cigarettes smoked in the preceding 7 days (prior to hospital admission for participants recruited from hospitals, and prior to baseline assessment for other participants). Average daily cigarette use was determined by dividing the total number of cigarettes smoked by 7.
Nicotine dependence. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) scale was used to measure level of nicotine dependence .
Patient status. We categorized smokers recruited from hospitals as “IP”; those recruited from other sources (e.g., clinics, health centers, and by media outreach) were designated “OP”.
Primary diagnosis. Participants’ primary diagnoses were identified at recruitment; primary diagnoses included cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD risk factors (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia), cancer, diabetes, gastrointestinal disease, pulmonary disease, genital-urinary disease, and other illnesses.
Descriptive statistics were presented to summarize participants’ socio-demographic profiles, primary diagnoses, and patterns of tobacco use. A major hypothesis of this study was that IP and OP might differ in smoking behaviors due to differences in health status; therefore, we also compared IP and OP profiles and patterns of tobacco use. ANOVA analyses examined the means and χ2 tests. Multiple regression analyses were then performed to assess the associations of socio-demographic variables, acculturation, and years of smoking with tobacco-use variables (i.e., average daily cigarette use, level of nicotine dependence, and past-year quit attempts), and, finally, with IP or OP status. In the analyses, IP or OP patient status was used as a proxy for participants’ health: IP implied poorer health than OP. We conducted two-step multiple regression analyses. The step-one model included age, education, employment, marital status, acculturation, and years of smoking as predictors of tobacco-use variables. The step-two model included in- or out- patient status. Dichotomous variables were generated for education level, employment, marital status, and patient status. Gender was not included in the analyses as a variable because more than 90% of the participants were men. Missing or incomplete data precluded our use of household income as a variable. All of these analyses were conducted using Microsoft Windows’ Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 15.0 .
Two-thirds of the participants were recruited from ambulatory settings. Details of socio-demographics for the study sample are presented in Table 1. The study sample was predominately male. Their ages ranged from 18 to 89 years, with a mean age of 58.3. About four-fifths were married or lived with a partner. About one-third were high school graduates. Two-fifths were employed. One-half reported an annual household income of less than $20,000. The vast majority (73%) was born in mainland China. More than half had resided in the US 16 years or longer. Most (86%) preferred to communicate in Cantonese, and only 10% reported fluency in English.
The demographic profiles of participants recruited from in- and outpatient settings differed in many ways (see Table 1). Compared to IP, OP were younger, more likely to be employed, had more years of formal education, reported higher household income, and reported greater English fluency (this last resulted in higher acculturation scores). In contrast, the majority of IP had less than a high school education (78 vs. 46%) and spoke no English (65 vs. 28%).
As shown in Table 2, over 75% of IPs’ diagnoses were tobacco-related. Among IPs with CVD diagnoses, 65% were admitted with coronary artery disease or stroke. In contrast, only 8% of OP had a CVD diagnosis; 41% had CVD risk factors such as hypertension or hyperlipidemia. Overall, IP appeared to have poorer disease profiles than OP (e.g., CVD and cancer), whereas OP were likely to exhibit risk factors for chronic diseases (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia).
Patterns of tobacco use were compared for IP and OP; these results are summarized in Table 3. The two groups did not differ in onset of cigarette use. On average, IP had smoked regularly for a longer period of time than OP, probably because IP were generally older. IP, however, were currently smoking less than OP. They smoked about 4.4 cigarettes per day, compared to 11.9 cigarettes per day among OP. A majority of IP (68%), smoked 5 or fewer cigarettes on average per day, compared to OP (only 22% of OP smoked an average of 5 or fewer cigarettes per day). More than 1 in 4 OP (26.6%) reported an average daily use of 20 cigarettes or more, compared to about 1 in 20 (5.6%) for IP. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the number of serious quit attempts in the past year.
IP, on average, scored lower FTND nicotine-dependence scores than OP (Table 3). Further exploration of the scale findings indicate that the differences between the 2 groups centered on 2 items. Proportionally, more OP than IP reported that they hated to give up the first cigarette of the day, and they reported smoking even when they were ill.
Average daily cigarette use was significantly and positively predicted by employment status and higher acculturation in the first model (Table 4). When patient status was entered in the model, acculturation was no longer a significant predictor. Overall, being employed was associated with increased average daily cigarette use, and IP was negatively associated with average daily cigarette use.
None of the variables significantly predicted nicotine dependence in the first model. When patient status was entered in the model, being IP was negatively associated with nicotine dependence.
Years of smoking significantly predicted past-year quit attempts. In other words, the longer participants had smoked, the less likely they were to have attempted to quit in the preceding year. Patient status was not significantly associated with past-year quit attempts.
This is the first study to report on tobacco-use behaviors among Chinese American smokers with medical conditions. Our study suggests that the smoker’s general state of health, more than the level of acculturation, influences levels of cigarette use and nicotine addiction. On average, IP had smoked fewer daily cigarettes in the past week than OP (4.4 vs. 11.9). IP were also less likely than OP to smoke when ill (12 vs. 24%), and IP had lower nicotine-dependence scores than OP (5.5 vs. 6.7).
In contrast to earlier population-based studies of Chinese smokers [8, 10], we did not find a significant association between acculturation, age, and tobacco-use behaviors after adjustment for health status. Instead, our study suggests that individual tobacco-use behavior may largely be due to illness burdens among Chinese smokers with medical conditions. One intriguing finding is that being employed was significantly associated with higher average daily cigarette use, regardless of health status. The majority of employed participants (60%) worked in non-skilled jobs, such as restaurant or construction work. It is possible that stress associated with unskilled labor, coupled with workplaces that are likely to tolerate cigarette use, contributed to the higher average daily cigarette use found among this segment of smokers.
The rate of past-year quit attempts among our sample of smokers with medical conditions was considerably lower than rates reported by Chinese immigrants in the California Chinese American Tobacco Survey (CCATUS; 40 vs. 60%) . The lower rate of past-year quit attempts among our study participants compared to that of CCATUS smokers is surprising, given that smokers with illness burdens are more likely to attempt to quit than “healthier” smokers . One possible reason for this unexpected finding is that a substantial percentage of smokers in our sample were light smokers (e.g., ~40% smoked <5 cigarettes per day, and 68% smoked <10 cigarettes per day), compared to current smokers in the CCATUS study, only 25.8% of whom reported smoking 5 or fewer cigarettes per day . In our sample, smokers with medical conditions may have already reduced their cigarette use in prior quit attempts. It is plausible that these light smokers did not believe that further reduction or complete cessation of smoking would produce health benefits. For example, almost 50% of the current smokers in CCATUS endorsed the statement that smoking 5 cigarettes per day has the same health risk as not smoking at all (H Tang, University of California, San Diego, personal communication, May 21, 2008). Therefore, focused education may be necessary to increase the cessation rate, especially among light smokers in the Chinese community.
In light of the fact that the quit-attempt rate has been reported to be the single most significant factor in annual cessation rates across Chinese populations , the lower rate of quit attempts in our study of smokers with medical conditions underscores an urgent need for effective cessation programs in health-care settings. Asian Americans are more likely than whites to be non-daily smokers [19, 20]. In addition, according to a study that controlled for self-reported health status, light smokers and non-daily smokers are more likely to want to quit than daily smokers [14, 15]. In our study, close to 1 in 4 smokers (24%) reported not smoking on the interview date or on the day prior to hospital admission. The relatively high numbers of non-daily smokers and light smokers among these smokers with medical conditions suggests that clinicians can play a critical role in identification and assessment of smokers in health-care settings, as well as in offering treatment to smokers in those settings. In particular, IP smokers—who were more likely than OP to be light smokers and less nicotine dependent—should be aggressively targeted for intervention. Given the severity of their disease profiles, hospitalization provides an opportune moment to advise IP smokers to quit. However, some clinicians may perceive smokers with worse illness burdens as having greater nicotine dependence, as not being receptive to cessation advice, and as having a lower probability for cessation success; thus some clinicians may be less inclined to provide appropriate intervention. In addition, recent data suggests that non-daily smokers were asked or advised about smoking cessation less often than daily smokers . Thus, clinicians may incorrectly assume that smokers who consume five or fewer cigarettes per day are not addicted to nicotine, especially when these light smokers do not exhibit withdrawal symptoms during periods of abstention, such as hospitalization. Our study suggests that it is critical to inform clinicians that they are important facilitators of smoking cessation, and that they have a prime opportunity to improve the health of their patients who smoke.
Our sample of smokers was recruited primarily from health-care settings and composed of older immigrant men who spoke no English and had low educational levels. Many were retired and only about 40% were employed, either part- or full-time. As a result, more than half of participants reported annual household income of less than $20,000. This particular combination of socio-demographic characteristics (older age, poor, less education, and low English proficiency) suggests that our participants would likely encounter tremendous barriers in seeking appropriate and affordable smoking cessation treatment services. Our study confirms large gaps in tobacco treatment services in the San Francisco Bay Area for Chinese-speaking smokers. During the study period, smoking cessation treatment programs for Chinese speakers were not available at any of the participating hospital sites. Although one HMO offered a smoking cessation group counseling program for outpatients, the program was not accessible to Chinese-speakers. Moreover, the seriousness of medical conditions, particularly among IP smokers (with >75% tobacco-related illnesses), and the long duration of their tobacco use (an average of 39 years), underscores the urgent need for timely cessation interventions, particularly in health-care facilities located in or near Chinese neighborhoods.
Several limitations of this study should be noted. Because of the study’s selection criteria, the sample population could differ from other Chinese American smokers with respect to socio-demographic characteristics and health status. For example, the participants in this study were not randomly selected. Rather, smokers with medical conditions were recruited from hospitals and clinics located in or near Chinese neighborhoods. This selection criterion may bias our results, producing not only a sicker and older population, but also a population with ready access to health care. Participants’ characteristics such as education, income, acculturation, and health needs may be different from smokers in other settings. The participants’ willingness to quit smoking was another criterion used to enroll smokers into the study. Thus, our sample population could differ from the general population, in which some smokers have little or no interest in quitting. In addition, the study relied on self-reported smoking behavior, and the self-reported medical diagnoses of about 20% of the smokers recruited through media outreach were not verified. Both factors may limit the study’s validity. However, we consider these to be minor limitations, given that prior studies comparing self-reported medical history with verified medical records found substantial agreement (>90% sensitivity and specificity), particularly for conditions related to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes [21, 22]. Lastly, our sample of smokers included a small number of women (~9%). It should be noted that a low smoking prevalence (<5%) has been reported among Chinese women in the US [7, 9]. Thus, the findings from CCSCP may not be generalizable to the entire population of Chinese American smokers.
Notwithstanding these limitations, the findings from this study point to both a critical need and tremendous opportunities to implement effective language- and culture-specific smoking-cessation interventions in health-care settings. Future tobacco treatment studies should pay particular attention to health status and illness burden among smokers in order to provide a more accurate assessment of needs, such as elucidating barriers to smoking-cessation treatment in health-care settings.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.