PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of molvisLink to Publisher's site
 
Mol Vis. 2009; 15: 2249–2258.
Published online Nov 9, 2009.
PMCID: PMC2776346
Increased neuronal nitric oxide synthase activity in retinal neurons in early diabetic retinopathy
Thomas J. Giove, Monika M. Deshpande, Christine S. Gagen, and William D. Eldredcorresponding author
Laboratory of Visual Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
The first two authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence to: W.D. Eldred, Laboratory of Visual Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Boston University, 5 Cummington St, Boston, MA, 02215; Phone: (617) 353-2439; FAX: (617) 358-1124; email: eldred/at/bu.edu
Received March 2, 2009; Accepted November 3, 2009.
Purpose
There are increased levels of nitric oxide (NO) in diabetic retinas. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent that neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) contributes to the increased levels of retinal NO in early diabetic retinopathy by examining the expression and activity of nNOS in retinal neurons after 5 weeks of diabetes.
Methods
Changes in NO levels were measured using NO imaging of retinal neurons in mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes for five weeks. NO imaging was compared to nNOS localization using immunocytochemistry, and nNOS message and protein levels were measured using quantitative real-time PCR and western blots.
Results
There was a close anatomic correlation between the localization of the increased NO production and the nNOS immunoreactivity in the retinal plexiform layers of diabetic retinas. There was no change in nNOS message, but nNOS protein was decreased and its subcellular localization was altered. Treatment with insulin or aminoguanidine partially ameliorated the increase in NO in diabetic retinas.
Conclusions
These results suggest that increased nNOS activity is responsible for the majority of increased NO in retinal neurons in early diabetic retinopathy. This supports a role for increased nNOS activity in the early neuronal dysfunction in the diabetic retina.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of blindness among working age adults in the developed world [1]. DR is characterized by both neuronal dysfunction and the breakdown of the retinal vasculature [2]. Complications in the vasculature are important for disease progression and are easy to detect clinically. As a consequence, many studies have approached DR as being primarily vascular in its etiology. However, retinal neuron dysfunction occurs early in DR and may even precede vascular breakdown [3,4].
Evidence of early neuronal dysfunction is demonstrated as aberrant electroretinogram (ERG) responses before any visible vascular damage in diabetic rats [4,5] and humans [6,7]. Shirao and Kawasaki [8] concluded that the oscillatory potentials (OP) were the first ERG components affected in diabetes. OP changes are a better predictor of DR in humans than fundus photography or fluorescein angiograms [9]. Evidence for changes in visual processing has been seen in as little as two weeks in diabetic rats [10], while discernable vascular changes have been noted to occur after six months to one year [11]. Similarly, there is a decrease in color and contrast sensitivity and aberrant ERGs in diabetic humans after two years [12-14], while major vascular changes do not typically occur until 5–10 years after the onset of diabetes [3].
Several neurochemical changes have also been documented early in the diabetic retina. For example, Leith et al. [15] found increased glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in Müller cells along with increased levels of glutamate and an impaired breakdown of glutamate to glutamine. There is an increase in retinal neuron apoptosis early in DR, which also precedes the vascular damage in both rodents and humans [16,17]. The presynaptic proteins synaptophysin, synapsin 1, VAMP2, SNAP25, and PSD95 all show decreases after only one month of diabetes, especially when synaptosomal fractions are selectively examined [18]. A study by Kern et al. [19] showed that early vascular damage was prevented in rats by administering the COX inhibitor, nepafenac, but retinal ganglion cell apoptosis still occurred, denoting a separation between vascular and neuronal damage.
Nitric oxide (NO) is an important signaling molecule in the vertebrate retina found to either be produced by or have effects in every retinal cell type [20]. There is evidence for increased NO in both the vitreous and aqueous humors of patients with DR [21,22]. We have previously shown that neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) is the primary source of neuronal NO and the most abundant form of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in retina [23-25]. However, there is little characterization of nNOS in DR, and the results have been inconsistent [26,27].
In this study, we examined changes in NO and nNOS in the retinas of mice that had streptozotocin-induced diabetes (STZID) for five weeks. We found no change in nNOS message levels, but nNOS protein levels decreased and its subcellular localization was altered in the inner plexiform layer (IPL). Despite this, total NO levels quantified using the NO-sensitive dye diamino-5-methylamino-2',7’-difluorofluorescein diacetate-FM (DAF-FM) increased significantly. The increased NO production was closely anatomically correlated with the immunocytochemical localization of nNOS. The results of this study suggest that nNOS enzyme activity is upregulated early in DR and is concomitant with neuronal dysfunction.
Unless specified otherwise, all reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) or Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). All of the experiments were done in normal room light, with the exception of the NO imaging, which, for technical reasons, was done using dark-adapted retinas. All statistical evaluations were performed using OriginPro 8 software (OriginLab, North Hampton, MA).
Animals
Adult (between 3 and 5 months of age), male C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and were kept on a standard 12 h:12 h light-dark cycle with free access to food and water. All animals were treated using protocols approved by the Boston University Charles River Campus Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were age matched and made diabetic by an intraperitoneal (IP) injection of 75 mg/kg streptozotocin (STZ; Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA) in pH 4.5 citrate buffer; each injection was given after an 8-h fast, one injection per day for three consecutive days. Control animals received three IP injections of citrate buffer alone after an 8 h fast on the same days as the experimental animals. The animals were allowed to recover for two days before their blood glucose levels were tested with a FreeStyle FlashTM blood glucose meter (Therasense, Almeda, CA). Mice were considered diabetic if their fasting blood glucose level was at or over 250 mg/dl. Animals that did not become diabetic were not used for this study. Treatment with insulin, aminoguanidine (AG), or Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) was given to subsets of animals starting one week after induction of diabetes. Thus, these treatments were given for a duration of 4 weeks up to the time of sacrifice as follows. Once a day, 2 U/kg insulin from bovine pancreas (in sterile saline; Sigma I5500) was administered via IP injection. Also once a day, NOS inhibitor L-NAME (37.5 mg/kg in sterile 0.1 M pH 7.4 phosphate buffer, PB) was administered by IP. Every day, 1 g/l AG, an inhibitor of both NOS and advanced glycation end product (AGE) formation, was administered to animals in their drinking water, which was changed daily. Animal weight and fasting blood glucose levels were recorded at the beginning and end of each experimental cycle. Final blood glucose levels and bodyweights were compared between each group using ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was performed using Tukey’s test. A p<0.05 was considered significant. Animals were euthanized in each experiment by exposing them to IsoFlow™ Isoflurane gas (Abbott Laboratories) until they were deeply anesthetized, and then they were immediately decapitated.
Protein extraction and western blotting
Following sacrifice, the eyes were rapidly removed and placed into balanced salt solution (BSS; 137 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 15 mM D-glucose, 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM Na2HPO4, and 10mM HEPES, pH 7.4) and the retinas were then surgically isolated from the eyes. Specimens in solution were immediately placed into 1.5 ml centrifuge tubes, set on dry ice. Six retinas (three animals) were pooled together to ensure an adequate amount of protein for detection by western blotting. The retinas were then suspended in 200 μl of homogenization buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.05% SDS, and 1X Complete Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail with EDTA (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) before being ultrasonically homogenized. The protein concentration in each sample was determined using the Bradford method. In each lane, 100 μg protein was loaded onto 8% SDS PAGE gels and transferred onto 0.4 μm Immobilon™ PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA). A rapid detection method was used, whereby the blocking step was omitted [28]. The primary antiserum was a rabbit anti-nNOS (sc648; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) that was diluted 1:5,000 in 2% BSA in Tris buffered saline w/ 0.25% Tween-20 (TBST). The secondary antibody was a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat polyclonal antiserum raised against rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at a dilution of 1:100,000. The blots were then treated with Immobilon™ HRP substrate (Millipore) and exposed to blue X-ray film (F-BX57; Phenix, Asheville, NC). To confirm equal lane loading, we stripped the blots and reprobed them with mouse anti-β-tubulin. The β-tubulin monoclonal antibody used was developed by Dr. Willi Hafler and was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank. This antibody was developed under the auspices of the NICHD and is maintained by The University of Iowa (Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA). Quantitative analysis was performed using Image J image analysis software (Wayne Rasband, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD). The difference in protein levels was evaluated using the paired Student’s t-test. A p<0.05 was considered significant.
Immunocytochemistry
After euthanasia, the mouse eyes were rapidly enucleated and placed in ice-cold BSS. The anterior chamber, lens, and vitreous were then removed and the resultant eyecups were immediately placed into 4% paraformaldehyde in PB for 90 min at room temperature. Next, the eyecups were cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PB, embedded and frozen in Optimal Cutting Temperature embedding media (OCT; Tissue-Tek, Miles, Inc., Elkhard, IN), and cut into 14 µm thick cross-sections using a cryostat and mounted on Superfrost /Plus® slides (Fisher Scientific). The eyecups from the control and diabetic mice were embedded into the same block and cryosectioned onto the same slide to reduce variability when comparing changes in immunoreactivity. The asymmetry provided by this embedding method allowed us to clearly distinguish each of the eyecups in the resultant cryosections. Thus we could embedded one eye from each of 4 separate mice with different treatments in the same block.
Immunocytochemistry was performed on the retinal sections using standard methods as previously described [25,29] on retinal cross-sections mounted on slides. Immunochemical procedures were replicated, using at least three different animals (n=3), where each "n" was the average of three trials for a given animal compared to the other retinas on the same slide as described in the previous paragraph. The primary antiserum used was rabbit anti-nNOS (sc648; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a dilution of 1:1,000 overnight in a humid chamber at 4 °C. The slides were then washed 3×10 min in 0.1 M PB at room temperature and then incubated for 2 h in an Alexa488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antiserum (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA) at a dilution of 1:500. Incubation with the primary antiserum omitted served as a control for nonspecific secondary antiserum staining. Slides were washed in 0.1 M PB as before, coverslipped with glycerol, and the fluorescent signal was visualized using an Olympus Fluoview™ 300 confocal microscope (Olympus, Melville, NY). The excitation was done using the 488 nm laser line from an argon laser and the emission was visualized using a 510–550 nm bandpass filter. Ten to 14 optical sections were taken at 1 μm intervals, with the same number of optical sections always being captured and compared for both the control and experimental retinas. The laser intensity and all confocal settings were kept consistent within replicates.
The “z project” function of Image J image analysis software was used to obtain a single image from a collapsed confocal optical stack. The images were then converted to inverted grayscale so that the immunoreactivity would appear black. Mean intensity values were then recorded for each treatment and compared to the control retina on the same slide. These values were averaged together for each animal and compared to the average control mean using the paired Student’s t-test. A p<0.05 was considered significant. The relative intensity of immunoreactivity within each retinal layer was quantified using Image J to produce a horizontal line-profile average of the intensity of the immunoreactivity in the different retinal layers, minimizing the effect of local regional differences.
RNA isolation and reverse transcription
The retinas were isolated in BSS as described in the immunocytochemistry methods section, although all reagents and materials were kept RNase-free. Total RNA was then isolated from the retinas using a standard Trizol™ reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) extraction. To obtain sufficient amounts of RNA to perform these reactions, we pooled three animals (six retinas) together for each extraction. The RNA was then treated with rDNase™ (Ambion, Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX), following the manufacturer’s instructions, to remove any DNA contaminants. The RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop™ spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). RNA was then converted into cDNA using the Verso™ cDNA kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) and subsequently treated with 2 U of RNase H™ (ThermoFisher Scientific) at 37 °C for 20 min.
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis (qPCR) was performed using cDNA converted from 1 µg of retinal RNA as described in the previous section, using an ABI PrismTM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). We used a pre-designed TaqMan™ gene expression assay (Applied Biosystems) for nNOS (assay ID: Mm00435173_m1). Our normalizing control was an optimized 18s rRNA primer set that was kindly provided to us by Dr. Ulla Hansen (Boston University, Boston, MA), which was designed to work with SYBR Green™ (Applied Biosystems). All data was obtained in quadruplicate and analyzed using the Microsoft ExcelTM qGene template [30].
NO imaging
NO imaging was performed as reported previously [24]. Since DAF-FM is a light sensitive dye, all aspects of the NO imaging experiments, beginning with the retinal eyecups, were done in the dark using infrared imaging, except for the actual final light stimulations. To prepare retinal slices, we enucleated the eyes and removed the anterior segment of the eye and lens under dim light. We placed the eyecups in chilled aerated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF, 125 mM NaCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 3 mM KCl, 1.6 mM CaCl2, 1.5 mM MgSO4, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, and 10 mM glucose) in the dark on ice for 1 h to allow the retinas to recover and fully dark adapt. The eyecups were then sectioned into 250-µm-thick slices. Loading of the NO-sensitive dye, DAF-FM (Molecular Probes), was done as previously described [31]. Briefly, slices were allowed to recover from slicing for at least 30 min in ACSF at room temperature and then incubated for 60 min in ACSF containing 10 µM of DAF-FM at 37 °C. Slices were then washed 3x 15 min with fresh, aerated ACSF at 37 °C.
Some slices were stimulated for 20 min with a light emitting diode (660 nm, 3Hz, 20 µW, 25% duty cycle), while a matched set of slices were kept in the dark for comparison. Light-stimulated and control sections were then fixed in the dark for 2 h with 4% paraformaldehyde in PB and then they were washed 4×15 min in 0.1 M PB at room temperature. Fluorescent images of the retinal slices were acquired using a FluoviewTM 300 confocal microscope (Olympus Corporation) using a 40× water immersion objective and the FluoviewTM 2.1 software. Image preparation and analysis was conducted using Image J software as described above.
To ensure unbiased thresholding of the images when comparing the different retinal regions or treatments, we assigned a threshold value, using a custom written Image J plugin, which determined the inflection point for the region of interest (ROI) of each collapsed confocal optical image stack. Briefly, on a plot of arbitrary fluorescent units obtained from the confocal microscope versus the number of pixels in the image, the inflection point was computed as a point on the curve at which the tangent crossed the curve. Fluorescent pixels above this threshold value were quantified for each ROI using the “ROI manager.”
The quantitative analysis of these collapsed image stacks was done using the freehand selection tool in Image J to select specific ROIs. At least 25 ROIs from each animal in each category and at least five animals in each treatment group were analyzed in this manner. The average number of fluorescent pixels of all images from one animal was considered as n=1. The final graphs depict the mean and standard deviation (SD) of at least n=5 animals to average out any minor local intensity differences. The difference between the control and experimental groups was analyzed using ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was performed using Tukey’s test. A p<0.05 was considered significant.
General condition of the mice used in this study
Mice with STZID averaged a lower weight when compared to controls after five weeks, however this difference was not statistically significant (Table 1). The only statistically significant differences were between control and insulin (p=0.0004) and control and L-NAME (p=0.03). To our observation, the diabetic mice had slightly diminished body appearance and activity levels; their activity levels were returned to normal by administering insulin or AG. In addition to diminished bodyweight, the animals that received L-NAME appeared more emaciated and lethargic than their untreated diabetic counterparts (data not shown).
Table 1
Table 1
Health characteristics of mice used in this study.
Blood glucose levels were significantly elevated in diabetes (p<0.0001). These levels were significantly lowered by insulin, although it was still significantly higher than control (p<0.0001). L-NAME or AG did not appear to affect blood glucose levels and were not significantly different from untreated diabetic, but remained significantly different from control and insulin treated animals (p<0.0001; Table 1).
NO increased after 5 weeks of STZID and was reduced by insulin, aminoguanidine, or L-NAME
To examine any changes in NO levels in the retina after 5 weeks of STZID, we measured the NO-induced fluorescence (NO-IF) using the NO sensitive dye DAF-FM. We detected basal levels of NO-IF in all retinal layers in the dark-adapted retinas (Figure 1A). We observed an overall increase in NO-IF in dark-adapted diabetic retinas. In comparison to control retinas, the intensity of NO-IF in diabetic retinas increased significantly in the outer plexiform layer (OPL) by 82±19% (p<0.0001) and in the IPL by 48±18% (p=0.016; Figure 1A,B). NO-IF also appeared in the diabetic outer nuclear layer (ONL), which was usually not seen in the control ONL (Figure 1A). Interestingly, presumptive bipolar cells in the control inner nuclear layer (INL) often had NO-IF both in their somata and processes, but they appeared to have lost NO-IF in their processes in the diabetic condition. There was no significant change in the number or intensity of labeled cell bodies in the INL or ganglion cell layer (GCL) in diabetic retinas when compared to controls.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in NO-induced fluorescence (NO-IF) in the diabetic retina. A: NO-IF increased in the diabetic retina compared to control. NO-IF in processes from somata in the inner nuclear layer (INL) were present in control (white arrowhead) but absent in the (more ...)
Treatment with insulin partially reduced the NO-IF in the diabetic retinas (Figure 1A,B). Insulin treatment lowered NO-IF levels in the OPL and IPL to about half that of the untreated diabetics, however this trend was only statistically significant in the OPL (p=0.01). Neither the number of cells exhibiting NO-IF nor the intensity of NO-IF in the INL and GCL were significantly different from controls. In addition, insulin restored NO-IF to some processes of somata in the INL and greatly decreased the levels of NO-IF in the ONL (Figure 1A). While insulin did help restore NO-IF to near normal levels, we did not observe a complete rescue. This was most likely because the insulin was only administered once daily. As a consequence, the blood glucose levels of the insulin treated mice were lower than the untreated diabetics, although their blood glucose levels were still elevated above 250 mg/dl (Table 1).
Treatment with L-NAME reduced retinal NO-IF to levels too low to be detected by our NO imaging method (data not shown). Treatment with AG significantly returned NO-IF to near control levels in the OPL (86±14%, p<0.0001) and in the IPL (80±18%, p=0.004; Figure 1B), but the NO-IF in the processes in the INL did not return with AG treatment as it did with insulin (Figure 1A). The number of cells exhibiting NO-IF and intensity in the INL and GCL levels were not significantly different from control.
While the results described were for dark-adapted, unstimulated retinas, we also performed the same experiments using retinas stimulated with flashing light (Figure 1C). The results were comparable to retinas in the dark, although the basal levels of NO-IF were higher in stimulated control retinas. In diabetic mice, the NO-IF in the OPL significantly increased by 49 ± 11% (p=0.0002), while in the IPL it went up by 23±13% (p=0.02). Interestingly, insulin seemed to have a stronger effect in the OPL and IPL of light-stimulated retinas, significantly lowering NO-IF to near control levels in the OPL (93±18%, p<0.0001) and in IPL (83±17%, p=0.0016). AG had a dramatic effect in the light-stimulated retinas, with intensities significantly down to 112±13% in the OPL (p=0.02) and lower (but not statistically significant) to 98±14% in the IPL (Figure 1B,C).
nNOS protein levels decrease after 5 weeks of STZID
While NO-IF increased, nNOS-like immunoreactivity (nNOS-LI) significantly decreased by 21±11% in the OPL (p=0.005), 15±9% in the IPL (p=0.012), 19±17% in the INL (p=0.001), and 26±14% in the GCL (p=0.006; Figure 2A). These changes were not affected by treatment with insulin or AG (data not shown). There was nNOS-LI in the IPL in many apparent neuronal processes in control retinas. Interestingly, nNOS-LI was largely absent from such processes of the IPL in the diabetic condition and appeared more punctate in expression, suggesting nNOS-LI was in synaptic boutons (Figure 2B). Western blots probed with the nNOS antiserum confirmed an overall reduction of nNOS protein by 24±11% (p=0.005), consistent with our immunocytochemistry (ICC) findings (Figure 2C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
nNOS protein levels decreased after 5 weeks of diabetes. A: Mean fluorescence levels of nNOS immunoreactivity were significantly reduced in the outerplexiform layer (OPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and ganglion cell layer (more ...)
To determine if the change in nNOS protein was due to a decrease in nNOS gene expression, we performed qPCR using an Applied Biosystem’s TaqMan™ assay. We found no difference in nNOS mRNA expression levels between control and diabetic retinas (Figure 3), an indication that changes in nNOS protein levels were not due to changes in its gene expression.
Figure 3
Figure 3
qPCR measurements of retinal nNOS transcripts using an Applied Biosystems TaqMan™ assay. No difference was seen between control and diabetic nNOS mRNA levels. The values are depicted as mean normalized expression (MNE) compared to the 18s rRNA (more ...)
Neuronal versus vascular complications
Several studies of DR find evidence for cellular and metabolic abnormalities in retinal neurons before vascular complications [4,8,32]. In both human and animal models of DR, retinal dysfunction can first be detected using ERGs, long before any vascular pathology becomes apparent [8]. However, permeability changes can occur as early as eight days after diabetic onset in rats [33], and future studies should consider this. Nonetheless, studies that have looked at the vasculature in greater detail did not find major vascular complications until 6 months to 21 months after the onset of diabetes in rodents [11,32,34,35].
Role of nNOS in diabetic retinopathy
We found a large increase in NO production, which mirrored the anatomic localization of nNOS-LI, despite an overall decrease in nNOS protein levels. There have been relatively few studies examining nNOS in retinal neurons of diabetic animals, and the results have varied. One study used a combination of western blots and ICC to conclude that the number of nNOS-positive bipolar cells increases in the INL of the diabetic rat after nine weeks [26]. More consistent with our findings, an earlier study using a combination of NADPH diaphorase histochemistry and ICC found that the total number of nNOS expressing neurons decreases, and this loss is prevented by AG [27].
nNOS is responsible for the increases in NO-IF in the OPL and IPL
It is theoretically possible that some of the NO-IF we observed was produced from inducible NOS (iNOS) or endothelial NOS (eNOS). Several studies have examined iNOS as a potential mediator of DR. However, these studies all indicated that iNOS plays a critical role in subsequent vascular damage and do not link iNOS with early neuronal dysfunction [36-38]. Du et al. [39], showed that high glucose caused an increase in iNOS in the Müller cell culture line rMC-1, but not in bovine retinal endothelial cells. Abu El-Asrar et al. [38] detect iNOS in Müller cells of human patients with DR, but not in any cells of the retinas of normal individuals. Therefore, although iNOS is clearly involved in the pathology of the diabetic retina, it is more closely associated with glial and vascular complications. To our knowledge, there is no definitive evidence linking iNOS to the early neuronal pathology seen in DR, and there has been no selective localization of iNOS within the IPL or OPL. In contrast, our NO imaging results from this and previous studies [24,25] clearly indicated that the NO-IF in retina is closely anatomically correlated with nNOS-LI—observations that support our belief that the increased NO was coming from nNOS and not iNOS.
Although we detected relative low levels of eNOS mRNA compared to nNOS mRNA in retina using qPCR and found eNOS-LI in retinal vasculature (data not shown), we did not detect eNOS in retinal neurons using several commercially available eNOS antisera (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., sc8311, sc653, and sc654; BD Transduction Labs, 610298). However, this was not surprising since previous work shows only weak immunocytochemical staining of eNOS protein in the INL and blood vessels, suggesting that it is not abundant in the retina [36,40]. Although there is evidence that eNOS is involved in vascular complications of DR, the vasculature only makes up about 3%–5% of the retina [36,41]. Most important, the increased NO-IF we observed in the plexiform layers is not likely to be produced by eNOS, because the NO-IF is clearly not associated with blood vessels.
If NO is contributing to various stages of DR, then it is extremely important to find usable inhibitors of NOS as potential therapeutic targets. Gross inhibition of NOS is not a realistic option, as we found that L-NAME almost completely eliminated NO-IF and this treatment was not well tolerated. In the present study, AG was well tolerated, and it was apparent that AG was able to inhibit nNOS. Other studies also show that AG is not exclusively an iNOS inhibitor, as it is often reported to be [42,43]. However, since AG is also an inhibitor of AGE formation [44,45], we cannot discount the role AGE formation may play in regulating NO levels.
Potential mechanisms for increased nNOS activity
In both diabetic human [46] and rat retinas [47], there is increased NMDA receptor NR1 subunit immunoreactivity. These NMDA receptor channels provide an important route for Ca2+ entry, and subsequent activation of Ca2+-dependent intracellular enzymes such as nNOS. Neurotoxicity associated with excitatory amino acids is reported to be mediated to a large extent through the activation of NMDA receptors [48]. Since nNOS activity is Ca2+-dependent and calmodulin-dependent, it would be also be activated by these Ca2+ increases [49]. Furthermore, a subset of nNOS resides at the post-synaptic density by virtue of its PDZ-domain; this may explain why the nNOS we find remaining in the diabetic IPL appears largely synaptic [50]. Any nNOS at the post-synaptic density would be in close proximity to the largest influxes of calcium. Thus the reduction of nNOS protein may be compensated for by large glutamate-induced influxes of calcium at synapses.
Another significant possibility is that there is a post-translational activation of nNOS. nNOS enzyme activity is strongly inhibited by a Ca2+-dependent and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II that phosphorylates nNOS at Ser847 [51,52]. Increased levels of Ca2+ can activate calcineurin (PP2B) to dephosphorylate nNOS at Ser847, which in turn allows nNOS to increase NO production [53]. Thus it is possible that increased Ca2+ levels can stimulate NO production in two distinct ways: by increasing intracellular Ca2+ to directly activate nNOS, and by activating calcineurin to activate nNOS through dephosphorylation of an inhibitory site.
Consequences of increased NO production in diabetes
There are several potential molecular and cellular consequences of an increase in NO in synapses. One consequence of diabetes is hypoxia in the diabetic retina [54]; NO from nNOS has been shown to sensitize neurons to hypoxia-induced death via competitive inhibition of cytochrome oxidase [55]. Thus, the increased NO may contribute to the early neuronal cell death in DR. NO has also been shown to increase release of neurotransmitters through both cGMP-dependent mechanisms [56] and through Ca2+ independent mechanisms involving synaptic vesicle docking and fusion reactions [57]. In particular, NO has been shown to increase release of glutamate in chick retina [58]. In contrast, NO has been shown to decrease glycine release in retina [59]. Such increased levels of retinal glutamate and decreased release of glycine may also be related to the increased cell death in DR. These neurochemical changes are consistent with studies using a combination of ICC, western blots, and qPCR that report that the presynaptic proteins synaptophysin, synapsin 1, VAMP2, SNAP25, and PSD95 all showed decreases after only one month of diabetes, especially when synaptosomal fractions were selectively examined [18].
Future studies will need to determine the exact mechanisms that led to the increase in nNOS activity. In addition, it will be important to separate the timing and relative contributions of nNOS versus iNOS to get an accurate picture of how each pool of NO affects the retina as a whole. However, the results of our study indicate that nNOS may play a major role in providing excess NO in early DR. Future studies should address how this pathologically increased NO can be selectively reduced without detrimentally affecting the many normal functions of NO in the retina. This approach could provide a significant new strategy for treating the early neuronal cell loss in DR.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Todd A. Blute, Felicitas B. Eldred, and Jan Blom for their outstanding support, valuable discussions, and technical assistance. We also thank Dr. Amit Agrawal for creating the ImageJ plug-in that allowed the analysis of our NO-IF images. This research was supported by NIH NEI EY04785 to WDE.
1. Aiello LM. Perspectives on diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:122–35. [PubMed]
2. Antonetti DA, Barber AJ, Bronson SK, Freeman WM, Gardner TW, Jefferson LS, Kester M, Kimball SR, Krady JK, LaNoue KF, Norbury CC, Quinn PG, Sandirasegarane L, Simpson IA., JDRF Diabetic Retinopathy Center Group. Diabetic retinopathy: seeing beyond glucose-induced microvascular disease. Diabetes. 2006;55:2401–11. [PubMed]
3. Lieth E, Gardner TW, Barber AJ, Antonetti DA. Retinal neurodegeneration: early pathology in diabetes. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2000;28:3–8. [PubMed]
4. Barber AJ. A new view of diabetic retinopathy: a neurodegenerative disease of the eye. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2003;27:283–90. [PubMed]
5. Lieth E, Gardner TW, Barber AJ, Antonetti DA. Retinal neurodegeneration: early pathology in diabetes. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2000;28:3–8. [PubMed]
6. Di Leo MA, Caputo S, Falsini B, Porciatti V, Greco AV, Ghirlanda G. Presence and further development of retinal dysfunction after 3-year follow up in IDDM patients without angiographically documented vasculopathy. Diabetologia. 1994;37:911–6. [PubMed]
7. Parisi V, Uccioli L. Visual electrophysiological responses in persons with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001;17:12–8. [PubMed]
8. Shirao Y, Kawasaki K. Electrical responses from diabetic retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1998;17:59–76. [PubMed]
9. Bresnick GH, Palta M. Predicting progression to severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:810–4. [PubMed]
10. Li Q, Zemel E, Miller B, Perlman I. Early retinal damage in experimental diabetes: electroretinographical and morphological observations. Exp Eye Res. 2002;74:615–25. [PubMed]
11. Engerman RL, Kern TS. Retinopathy in animal models of diabetes. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1995;11:109–20. [PubMed]
12. Daley ML, Watzke RC, Riddle MC. Early loss of blue-sensitive color vision in patients with type I diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:777–81. [PubMed]
13. Roy MS, Gunkel RD, Podgor MJ. Color vision defects in early diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104:225–8. [PubMed]
14. Sokol S, Moskowitz A, Skarf B, Evans R, Molitch M, Senior B. Contrast sensitivity in diabetics with and without background retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:51–4. [PubMed]
15. Lieth E, Barber AJ, Xu B, Dice C, Ratz MJ, Tanase D, Strother JM. Glial reactivity and impaired glutamate metabolism in short-term experimental diabetic retinopathy. Penn State Retina Research Group. Diabetes. 1998;47:815–20. [PubMed]
16. Abu-El-Asrar AM, Dralands L, Missotten L, Al Jadaan IA, Geboes K. Expression of apoptosis markers in the retinas of human subjects with diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2760–6. [PubMed]
17. Martin PM, Roon P, Van Ells TK, Ganapathy V, Smith SB. Death of retinal neurons in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3330–6. [PubMed]
18. VanGuilder HD, Brucklacher RM, Patel K, Ellis RW, Freeman WM, Barber AJ. Diabetes downregulates presynaptic proteins and reduces basal synapsin I phosphorylation in rat retina. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28:1–11. [PubMed]
19. Kern TS, Miller CM, Du Y, Zheng L, Mohr S, Ball SL, Kim M, Jamison JA, Bingaman DP. Topical administration of nepafenac inhibits diabetes-induced retinal microvascular disease and underlying abnormalities of retinal metabolism and physiology. Diabetes. 2007;56:373–9. [PubMed]
20. Eldred WD. Nitric oxide in the retina. Functional neuroanatomy of the nitric oxide system. In: Steinbusch HWM, Devente J, Vincente SR, editors. Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000. p. 111–145.
21. Yilmaz G, Esser P, Kociok N, Aydin P, Heimann K. Elevated vitreous nitric oxide levels in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:87–90. [PubMed]
22. Hattenbach LO, Allers A, Klais C, Koch F, Hecker M. L-Arginine-nitric oxide pathway-related metabolites in the aqueous humor of diabetic patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:213–7. [PubMed]
23. Blute TA, Mayer B, Eldred WD. Immunocytochemical and histochemical localization of nitric oxide synthase in the turtle retina. Vis Neurosci. 1997;14:717–29. [PubMed]
24. Eldred WD, Blute TA. Imaging of nitric oxide in the retina. Vision Res. 2005;45:3469–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Giove TJ, Deshpande MM, Eldred WD. Identification of alternate transcripts of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in the mouse retina. J Neurosci Res. 2009;87:3134–42. [PubMed]
26. Park JW, Park SJ, Park SH, Kim KY, Chung JW, Chun MH, Oh SJ. Up-regulated expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in experimental diabetic retina. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;21:43–9. [PubMed]
27. Roufail E, Soulis T, Boel E, Cooper ME, Rees S. Depletion of nitric oxide synthase-containing neurons in the diabetic retina: reversal by aminoguanidine. Diabetologia. 1998;41:1419–25. [PubMed]
28. Mansfield MA. Rapid immunodetection on polyvinylidene fluoride membrane blots without blocking. Anal Biochem. 1995;229:140–3. [PubMed]
29. Pong WW, Stouracova R, Frank N, Kraus JP, Eldred WD. Comparative localization of cystathionine beta-synthase and cystathionine gamma-lyase in retina: differences between amphibians and mammals. J Comp Neurol. 2007;505:158–65. [PubMed]
30. Muller PY, Janovjak H, Miserez AR, Dobbie Z. Processing of gene expression data generated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechniques. 2002;32:1372–9. [PubMed]
31. Blute TA, Lee MR, Eldred WD. Direct imaging of NMDA-stimulated nitric oxide production in the retina. Vis Neurosci. 2000;17:557–66. [PubMed]
32. Feit-Leichman RA, Kinouchi R, Takeda M, Fan Z, Mohr S, Kern TS, Chen DF. Vascular damage in a mouse model of diabetic retinopathy: relation to neuronal and glial changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4281–7. [PubMed]
33. do CA Ramos P, Reis A, Proenca R, Cunha-Vaz JG. Breakdown of the inner and outer blood retinal barrier in streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Exp Eye Res. 1998;67:569–75. [PubMed]
34. Lieth E, Gardner TW, Barber AJ, Antonetti DA. Retinal neurodegeneration: early pathology in diabetes. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2000;28:3–8. [PubMed]
35. Kern TS, Engerman RL. A mouse model of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:986–90. [PubMed]
36. Kern TS. Contributions of inflammatory processes to the development of the early stages of diabetic retinopathy. Exp Diabetes Res. 2007;2007:95103. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Zheng L, Du Y, Miller C, Gubitosi-Klug RA, Ball S, Berkowitz BA, Kern TS. Critical role of inducible nitric oxide synthase in degeneration of retinal capillaries in mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Diabetologia. 2007;50:1987–96. [PubMed]
38. Abu El-Asrar AM, Desmet S, Meersschaert A, Dralands L, Missotten L, Geboes K. Expression of the inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase in the retinas of human subjects with diabetes mellitus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:551–6. [PubMed]
39. Du Y, Sarthy VP, Kern TS. Interaction between NO and COX pathways in retinal cells exposed to elevated glucose and retina of diabetic rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004;287:R735–41. [PubMed]
40. Takeda M, Mori F, Yoshida A, Takamiya A, Nakagomi S, Sato E, Kiyama H. Constitutive nitric oxide synthase is associated with retinal vascular permeability in early diabetic rats. Diabetologia. 2001;44:1043–50. [PubMed]
41. Joussen AM, Poulaki V, Tsujikawa A, Qin W, Qaum T, Xu Q, Moromizato Y, Bursell SE, Wiegand SJ, Rudge J, Ioffe E, Yancopoulos GD, Adamis AP. Suppression of diabetic retinopathy with angiopoietin-1. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:1683–93. [PubMed]
42. Southan GJ, Szabo C. Selective pharmacological inhibition of distinct nitric oxide synthase isoforms. Biochem Pharmacol. 1996;51:383–94. [PubMed]
43. Jianmongkol S, Vuletich JL, Bender AT, Demady DR, Osawa Y. Aminoguanidine-mediated inactivation and alteration of neuronal nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:13370–6. [PubMed]
44. Edelstein D, Brownlee M. Mechanistic studies of advanced glycosylation end product inhibition by aminoguanidine. Diabetes. 1992;41:26–9. [PubMed]
45. Cameron NE, Gibson TM, Nangle MR, Cotter MA. Inhibitors of advanced glycation end product formation and neurovascular dysfunction in experimental diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1043:784–92. [PubMed]
46. Santiago AR, Hughes JM, Kamphuis W, Schlingemann RO, Ambrosio AF. Diabetes changes ionotropic glutamate receptor subunit expression level in the human retina. Brain Res. 2008;1198:153–9. [PubMed]
47. Ng YK, Zeng XX, Ling EA. Expression of glutamate receptors and calcium-binding proteins in the retina of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Brain Res. 2004;1018:66–72. [PubMed]
48. Romano C, Price MT, Olney JW. Delayed excitotoxic neurodegeneration induced by excitatory amino acid agonists in isolated retina. J Neurochem. 1995;65:59–67. [PubMed]
49. Bredt DS, Snyder SH. Isolation of nitric oxide synthetase, a calmodulin-requiring enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:682–5. [PubMed]
50. Brenman JE, Chao DS, Gee SH, McGee AW, Craven SE, Santillano DR, Wu Z, Huang F, Xia H, Peters MF, Froehner SC, Bredt DS. Interaction of nitric oxide synthase with the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95 and alpha1-syntrophin mediated by PDZ domains. Cell. 1996;84:757–67. [PubMed]
51. Nakane M, Mitchell J, Forstermann U, Murad F. Phosphorylation by calcium calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and protein kinase C modulates the activity of nitric oxide synthase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;180:1396–402. [PubMed]
52. Komeima K, Hayashi Y, Naito Y, Watanabe Y. Inhibition of neuronal nitric-oxide synthase by calcium/ calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIalpha through Ser847 phosphorylation in NG108–15 neuronal cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:28139–43. [PubMed]
53. Xu Y, Krukoff TL. Adrenomedullin stimulates nitric oxide production from primary rat hypothalamic neurons: roles of calcium and phosphatases. Mol Pharmacol. 2007;72:112–20. [PubMed]
54. Crawford TN, Alfaro DV, III, Kerrison JB, Jablon EP. Diabetic retinopathy and angiogenesis. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2009;5:8–13. [PubMed]
55. Jekabsone A, Neher JJ, Borutaite V, Brown GC. Nitric oxide from neuronal nitric oxide synthase sensitises neurons to hypoxia-induced death via competitive inhibition of cytochrome oxidase. J Neurochem. 2007;103:346–56. [PubMed]
56. Sistiaga A, Miras-Portugal MT, Sanchez-Prieto J. Modulation of glutamate release by a nitric oxide/cyclic GMP-dependent pathway. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997;321:247–57. [PubMed]
57. Meffert MK, Calakos NC, Scheller RH, Schulman H. Nitric oxide modulates synaptic vesicle docking fusion reactions. Neuron. 1996;16:1229–36. [PubMed]
58. Ientile R, Picciurro V, Pedale S, Nucci C, Malecka B, Nistico G, Macaione S. Nitric oxide enhances amino acid release from immature chick embryo retina. Neurosci Lett. 1996;219:79–82. [PubMed]
59. Yu D, Eldred WD. Nitric oxide stimulates gamma-aminobutyric acid release and inhibits glycine release in retina. J Comp Neurol. 2005;483:278–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Articles from Molecular Vision are provided here courtesy of
Emory University and the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China