|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Extrinsic signals controlling generation of neocortical neurons during embryonic life have been difficult to identify. In this study we demonstrate that the dorsal forebrain meninges communicate with the adjacent radial glial endfeet and influence cortical development. We took advantage of Foxc1 mutant mice with defects in forebrain meningeal formation. Foxc1 dosage and loss of meninges correlated with a dramatic reduction in both neuron and intermediate progenitor production and elongation of the neuroepithelium. Several types of experiments demonstrate that retinoic acid (RA) is the key component of this secreted activity. In addition, Rdh10 and Raldh2 expressing cells in the dorsal meninges were either reduced or absent in the Foxc1 mutants and Rdh10 mutants had a cortical phenotype similar to the Foxc1-null mutants. Lastly, in utero RA treatment rescued the cortical phenotype in Foxc1 mutants. These results establish RA as a potent, meningeal-derived cue required for successful corticogenesis.
Early in cerebral cortical development, lateral expansion of the cortical neuroepithelium dominates as neuroepithelial progenitors in the ventricular zone (VZ), the radial glial cells, symmetrically divide with both daughter cells reentering the cell cycle. As corticogenesis proceeds, the radial expansion of the cortex begins as VZ progenitors divide asymmetrically to generate post-mitotic neurons directly or intermediate progenitor cells (IPCs) destined for additional, neuron-generating divisions in the subventricular zone (SVZ) (Chenn and McConnell, 1995; Miyata et al., 2004; Noctor et al., 2004; Noctor et al., 2008). The balance of lateral and radial expansion of the neocortex depends upon the appropriately timed switch from symmetric to asymmetric divisions. Intrinsic (transcription factors, asymmetric protein distribution, etc.) and extrinsic factors (growth factors and other diffusible ligands) are implicated in the mechanics of this switch, most of which localize to cells in cortical neuroepithelium (Chenn and McConnell, 1995; Chenn and Walsh, 2002; Kawaguchi et al., 2004; Li et al., 1998; Qian et al., 1997). The factors that control the timing and continued progression of cortical neurogenesis, however, have remained largely obscure. Here we present evidence that all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) released from the meninges is involved in the decision of neuroepithelial cells to generate IPCs and neurons.
atRA is a hormone derived from vitamin A (retinol) that signals via binding to its nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RAR) and retinoid X receptors (RXR) (Chambon, 1996). atRA synthesis is a two-step process that requires retinol dehydrogenases (Rdh) and retinaldehyde dehydrogenases (Raldh1, 2, and 3) (Napoli, 2004; Ross et al., 2000). Raldh2 is critical for atRA synthesis in the developing embryo; Raldh2−/− embryos are almost entirely devoid of atRA signaling and die around E9.5–10.5 with defects in head, trunk and heart development (Niederreither et al., 1999). Adequate atRA production during development also depends upon the activity of Rdh10 as demonstrated by the dramatic reduction in atRA levels in the Rdh10 hypomorph which displays head, limb and organ defects typical of severe atRA deficiency (Sandell et al., 2007).
Early forebrain morphogenesis requires atRA signaling (Ribes et al., 2006) and at these early patterning stages the source of atRA is the adjacent forming eye and nasal pits that express Raldh2 and Raldh3 (Anchan et al., 1997; Molotkova et al., 2007). Even as these rich sources of atRA become spatially disparate from the dorsal forebrain, there is evidence of strong and very specific atRA signaling in the cortical radial glial progenitors. This has been perplexing largely because, even though RARα and RXRα, β are expressed in the cortical neuroepithelium (Dolle et al., 1994; Ruberte et al., 1993), the enzymes required for atRA synthesis are not expressed in the dorsal forebrain and, consequently, the functional role of atRA during corticogenesis has been largely neglected. In this study we show that mice that fail to form complete forebrain meninges, Foxc1 mutants (Vivatbutsiri et al., 2008; Zarbalis et al., 2007), have major defects in the switch from lateral VZ expansion to neuronogenic radial expansion of the cortex and this is due to a loss of meningeal derived atRA.
We previously identified a hypomorphic allele of the Foxc1 gene (Foxc1hith) with perinatal cortical dysplasia due to defects in the basement membrane and meningeal differentiation (Zarbalis et al., 2007). These Foxc1 hypomorphs displayed an earlier cortical phenotype characterized by a longer dorsal forebrain. To fully characterize this phenotype we analyzed an allelic series of Foxc1 mutants: Foxc1 hypomorphs (Foxc1hith/hith; Foxc1h/h), a hypomorph-null hybrid (Foxc1hith/lacZ; Foxc1h/l), and Foxc1-null embryos (Foxc1lacZ/lacZ; Foxc1l/l) (Kume et al., 1998). At E14.5 the dorsal forebrain was significantly longer (p<0.05; Fig. 1B) and appeared thinner in all three Foxc1 mutants compared to the wildtype (WT) with the phenotype worsening with decreased gene dosage (Fig. 1A). At E10.5 there was no cortical phenotype in any of the Foxc1 mutant lines (Supp. Fig. 1A), however, by E12.5 dorsal forebrain lengthening was evident (Supp. Fig. 1B). The extended cortical wall translated into cortical dysplasia that ranged from moderate to severe at E18.5 (Fig. 1C).
The lateral expansion of the neuroepithelium in the Foxc1 mutants suggests a predominance of symmetric divisions. We looked at this indirectly by analyzing expression of atypical-PKCλ (aPKCλ) and Par3, proteins that are enriched at the apical membrane of neuroepithelial cells undergoing symmetric divisions (Costa et al., 2008). In WT brains at E14.5, aPKCλ was present at low levels in the apical membrane of VZ progenitors along the ventricular surface with a few areas of bright apical staining (Fig. 2A). In all three Foxc1 mutant cortices, aPKCλ levels were significantly (p<0.05) elevated (Fig. 2A, C). Although less abundant, apical Par3 was also significantly (p<0.05) increased in all Foxc1 mutants with the Foxc1l/l mutants having the largest increase (Fig. 2B, C).
We next measured the output of asymmetric divisions, neurons and IPCs. A bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)/Ki-67 cell cycle exit assay was used to examine neuron generation. BrdU-positive (BrdU+) but Ki-67-negative (Ki-67-) cells were counted as cells that had exited the cell cycle. In WT cortex, a band of BrdU+/Ki-67- cells was apparent above the SVZ (Fig. 2D; above dotted line). All three mutants had significantly (p<0.05) reduced BrdU+/Ki-67- populations though the Foxc1h/h was less affected than the Foxc1h/l and Foxc1l/l mutants (Fig. 2E–H). Tbr2 immunolabeling was used to examine the IPCs population. Significant (p<0.05) reductions in Tbr2+ cell number were observed in all three Foxc1 mutants (Fig. 2I–M) with the Foxc1-null having the most severe deficit (Fig. 2L). At E14.5, the decrease in cell cycle exit (and presumable, to a lesser extent, the decrease in IPCs) correlated with a decrease in Ctip2+, post-mitotic neurons in the Foxc1 mutants (Fig. 2N–Q).
To determine the consequences of the decreased production of neurons and IPCs in older embryos, we examined expression of a deep (Ctip2) and a superficial cortical layer marker (Brn2) at E18.5. In all the Foxc1 mutants (Fig. 2S–U), the cortical layers were disorganized (Fig. 2R). Like at E14.5, the Ctip2+ cell population was progressively and dramatically reduced in number according to genotype. The Brn2 population in the VZ, SVZ and upper cortical layers was even more affected with very few Brn2+ cells present in the superficial cortex of the Foxc1l/l brain (Fig. 2U).
The decrease in neuron output and IPC production in the Foxc1 mutants could be caused by defects in forebrain patterning or the VZ progenitor population, a change in cell cycle, or radial glia detachment. Expression of dorsal forebrain-restricted Pax6 and Tbr2 highlighted the elongation of the dorsal forebrain but both were present in a normal spatial distribution (Supp. Fig. 1C). Closer examination of Pax6, expressed by neuronal progenitors in the VZ, showed that the thickness of the Pax6+ layer appeared normal in all the Foxc1 mutants (Supp. Fig. 1D). The Pax6 expression coupled with the increased length of the mutant cortices (and thus the neuroepithelium) provides additional evidence that the neuronal progenitor population is increased in the Foxc1 mutants. Cell cycle analysis in the VZ (S-phase and total length of the cell cycle) at E14.5 showed no overt differences in either parameter between WT and any of the Foxc1 mutants (Supp. Fig. 1E). We also found no evidence of increased in apoptotic cell death at E14.5 or E18.5 (data not shown). Finally, because of previous work describing basement membrane disruptions and radial glial detachment in the Foxc1h/h brains at E18.5 (Zarbalis et al., 2007), we examined laminin and nestin expression in the Foxc1l/l at E13.5. At this age, the dorsal forebrain phenotype was apparent but there was no evidence of disruption in the basement membrane in the Foxc1l/l cortex and the radial glial processes appeared well organized (Supp. Fig. 1F, G). In both WT and Foxc11/l cortices, the radial glial endfeet co-localized with laminin at the glia limitans (Supp. Fig. 1G, insets) and high-power, confocal images did not reveal radial glial detachment in the Foxc1l/l cortex (Supp. Fig. 1H).
The meninges are directly opposed to the radial glial endfeet of the VZ progenitors thus making them a potential root cause of the cortical phenotype in the Foxc1 mutants. To examine the distribution of meningeal fibroblasts in the Foxc1 mutants, we used an antibody that recognizes Zic protein family members that are expressed by meningeal fibroblasts (Inoue et al., 2008). In the E14.5 WT brain, Zic+ meningeal cells completely surrounded the forebrain (Fig. 3A). Zic+ meningeal cells as well as Zic+ Cajal-Retzius cells in the marginal zone of the brain were evident at higher magnification (Fig, 3A′). The Zic+ meningeal cells were present in ventral and lateral meninges the Foxc1h/h brain but bright, Zic+ meningeal cells were absent in the most dorsal meninges (Fig. 3B, B′). In the Foxc1h/l brain, Zic+ meningeal cells covered only a short portion of the lateral cerebral wall (Fig. 3C & C′). The Zic+ meninges in the Foxc1l/l were completely missing over the dorsal forebrain but were present ventrally (Fig. 3D & D′). To confirm that the Zic labeling reflected a loss of meninges and not just the loss of Zic expression, we looked at β-galactosidase (β-gal) activity in Foxc1l/+ and Foxc1l/l. In the Foxc1l/+, darkly labeled β-gal+ meningeal cells were present in a continuous layer around the brain and more lightly labeled vascular cells were evident in brain tissue (Fig. 3E & E′). In contrast, the darkly labeled β-gal+ meningeal cells in Foxc1l/l brains ended below the ventral forebrain leaving only β-gal+ vascular cells in the supracortical mesenchyme (Fig. 3F & F′).
The progressive decrease in neuron and IPC production as meningeal coverage declines suggests that the cortical phenotype in the Foxc1 mutants reflects a graded loss in a meningeal signal that influences the behavior of radial glial progenitors. To test this idea we performed two types of rescue experiments using E13.5 forebrain explants (Fig. 4A): (1) transplantation of Foxc1h/h forebrain into normal meninges and (2) co-culturing Foxc1h/h explants with Foxc1+/Zic+ meningeal cells (Supp. Fig. 2A & B) that conditioned the shared media.
Consistent with the in vivo experiments, untreated (i.e., no transplantation and no conditioned media) Foxc1h/h forebrain explants had a significantly (p<0.05) reduced proportion of BrdU+/Ki-67- cells (Fig. 4B, C & H). Meningeal transplantation did not affect cell cycle exit in the Foxc1+/ slices (Fig. 4D & H) however cell cycle exit was improved in the Foxc1h/h forebrain explants transplanted into the meningeal “ghosts” derived from Foxc1+/ forebrain (Fig. 4E & N). Similarly, co-culturing Foxc1h/h forebrain explants with meningeal cells also significantly (p<0.05) increased the proportion of BrdU+/Ki-67- cells but did not affect cell cycle exit in the Foxc1+/ forebrain explants (Fig. 4F, G & N).
atRA is a potent neuronal differentiation signal and enzymes required for atRA synthesis are expressed in the meninges making it an attractive candidate molecule as the meningeal factor. Treatment with atRA (10 μM) did not affect cell cycle exit in the Foxc1+/ explants but increased cell cycle exit in the cortex of Foxc1h/h explants (Fig. 4H, I & N). We next determined whether atRA is a required component of meningeal conditioned media for rescue of Foxc1h/h slices. We co-cultured meningeal cells and slices in media with B27 supplement that lacked vitamin A (B27-VA), the precursor used to make atRA. In addition, we cultured slices in meningeal conditioned media that had been exposed to sunlight to deplete the atRA. To confirm that atRA was decreased, atRA levels were assayed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) (Kane et al., 2005; Kane et al., 2008) (Supp. Fig. 2C). B27-VA conditioned media and atRA-depleted conditioned media did not alter cell cycle exit in Foxc1+/ slices (Fig. 4J, L & N) but both failed to rescue the cell cycle exit phenotype in the Foxc1h/h slices (Fig. 4K, M & N). We did, however, notice an increased number of pyknotic nuclei in some Foxc1+/ and Foxc1h/h explants cultured in meningeal conditioned media exposed to light (data not shown) which indicated increased cell death. Cell cycle exit in Foxc1+/ explants in this treatment condition did not differ from unconditioned media indicating that the change in cell viability was not influencing this parameter.
We next looked at the expression of Raldh2 and Rdh10, two enzymes critical for atRA synthesis, in WT and Foxc1 mutant meninges. In situ hybridization in E14.5 WT tissue showed that Raldh2 and Rdh10 signal was very high in the meninges, with no expression of Raldh2 evident in the dorsal forebrain and a very low level expression of Rdh10 in the cerebral wall (Fig. 5A, A′& E, E′). Unlike Raldh2, Rdh10 signal was also present in the choroid plexus and in the cortical hem in WT, Foxc1h/h and Foxc1h/l brains; this is consistent with previous analysis of Rdh10 expression in the embryonic brain (Romand et al., 2008). In the Foxc1h/h brain, Raldh2 and Rdh10 expression was detectable in ventral and lateral meninges but the expression intensity was patchy in the dorsal meningeal areas (Fig. 5B, B′ & F, F′). In addition, the intensity of the Raldh2 and Rdh10 signal was reduced in the Foxc1h/h meninges though the intensity levels were similar to WT in the facial mesenchyme. Even fewer Rdh10 and Raldh2 expressing cells surrounded the brains of the Foxc1h/l (Fig. 5C, C′ & G, G′) and Foxc1l/l (Fig. 5E, E′ & H, H′) mutants though there was expression in the residual, midline meninges.
To test whether the onset of the Foxc1 mutant cortical phenotype (E12.5 in the Foxc1h/h; E11.5 in the Foxc1h/l and Foxc1l/l mutants, data not shown), is temporally and spatially related to the normal appearance of Raldh2+ cells in the meninges, we examined Raldh2 protein expression in WT brains on E11.5, E12.5 and E14.5. At E11.5, no Raldh2 staining was present in the meninges but was evident around the developing nasal cavities (Fig. 6A). By E12.5, Raldh2+ cells were present in the ventral meninges and a few Raldh2+ cells were present in the lateral but not dorsal meninges (Fig. 6B and B′). This suggests that Raldh2+ cells appear in a lateral to medial gradient, which is the same distribution as the gradient for neuron production during this same period. By E14.5 the entire meninges contained Raldh2+ cells (Fig. 6C). Co-labeling of Raldh2 with Foxc1 or Foxc2 in the dorsal meninges showed that the Raldh2+ cells represent a subset of cells within the Foxc1+ meninges (Fig. 6D). Foxc2, a close homolog of Foxc1 that localizes to cells in the dura (Zarbalis et al., 2007), did not co-label with Raldh2+ cells in the dorsal meninges (Fig. 6E). In the ventral meninges, Foxc1 and Foxc2 both co-localized with meningeal Raldh2+ cells (Fig. 6F and G).
We used an Rdh10 hypomorphic mutant recovered from the same ENU mutagenesis screen as the Foxc1h/h mice (Zarbalis et al., 2004) that is viable to E16.5 to assess the requirement of atRA for corticogenesis (Ashique et al., manuscript in preparation). These mice have eye, face and limb defects that are very similar to a published Rdh10 hypomorphic allele that is only viable until E13.5 (Sandell et al., 2007). Similar to the Foxc1l/l cortical phenotype (Fig. 6J), the dorsal forebrain of the Rdh10 mutant was much longer than its WT littermate at E13.5 (Fig. 6H–I) and the thickness of the post-mitotic, Tuj1+ layer was reduced (Fig. 6K–M). Unlike the Foxc1l/l, the Zic+ meninges appear intact in the Rdh10 mutant (Supp. Fig. 3). Analysis of Brn2 and Ctip2 at E16.5 revealed a thinned cortex in the Rdh10 mutant with very few Ctip2 and Brn2+ cells present (Fig. 6N, O). The reduction in upper and lower cortical layer neurons was comparable to Foxc1l/l at E16.5 although the cortical layering was disorganized in the Foxc1 mutant (Fig. 6P).
To assess whether atRA is reduced in the Foxc1l/l mutant brains, total forebrain meninges or dorsal forebrain were collected separately from E14.5 Foxc1l/l brains and Foxc1+/ littermates. Meningeal tissue collected from the Foxc1l/l brains contained significantly less atRA (~20%; p<0.05) than littermate controls (Fig. 6Q). The decline was likely not greater because it was difficult to only collect the tissue surrounding the cortex thus Raldh2/Rdh10 expressing meninges from the midline and ventral forebrain Foxc1l/l meninges were included in the tissue dissected. An even greater decrease in atRA was observed in the Foxc1l/l cortices (~50%; p<0.05). In addition, there was ~3-fold more atRA in the meninges than in the cortex (0.74 μmol/mg tissue vs 0.28 μmol/mg tissue in Foxc1+/ samples).
To examine in vivo rescue of the cortical phenotype, we injected 20mg/kg atRA once daily into pregnant mice carrying Foxc1h/h, Foxc1h/l, or Foxc1l/l mutant embryos from E10.5 to E13.5 and collected them on E14.5. The atRA dosing regimen did not have any obvious effect on WT brains but led to a dramatic reduction in the dorsal forebrain length in the Foxc1h/h and Foxc1h/l mutants as compared to untreated mutants (Fig. 7A–F). Staining for Pax6 and Ctip2 untreated and atRA-treated brains highlights the decrease in the length of the neuroepithelium and increased thickness in the Ctip2+, post-mitotic population in the atRA-treated Foxc1 mutants. Higher magnification images of Ctip2 staining showed that atRA treatment did not affect generation of Ctip+ neurons in WT cortices but increased the number of Ctip2+ cells in the cerebral wall of Foxc1h/h and Foxc1h/l mutants as compared to untreated mutants (Fig. 7I–K). In the three litters analyzed, Foxc1h/l mutants showed a range of dorsal forebrain rescue (Supp. Fig. 5A). Interestingly, the 20 mg/kg atRA dose did not rescue the cortical expansion phenotype in the Foxc1l/l mutant (data not shown). A higher dose of atRA (30mg/kg) reduced the length of the dorsal forebrain and increased the Ctip2+ population as compared to the untreated Foxc1l/l mutant (Fig. 7G, H, L). Unfortunately, the higher dose of atRA also appeared to be toxic for the Foxc1l/l mutant embryos; in these brains, tissue integrity was compromised, the cells in the head and brain tissue appeared rounded, and there was activated caspase-3 in the head mesenchyme (Supp. Fig. 5B). Zic immunolabeling in WT (Supp. Fig. 4A, A′), Foxc1h/l (B, B′) and Foxc1l/l (C, C′) atRA exposed brains ruled out that the rescue of the Foxc1 mutants was result of an effect of atRA on the formation of the meninges (Supp. Fig. 4).
To quantify the atRA rescue, the length of the dorsal forebrain and the number of Ctip+ cells in a defined field was analyzed in atRA treated WT and Foxc1 mutant brains and compared to non-treated (NT) samples. atRA treatment significantly decreased (p<0.05) the length of the dorsal forebrain (Fig. 7M) and significantly increased (p<0.05) the number of Ctip2+ cells (Fig. 7N) in all Foxc1 mutants as compared to their NT counterparts. atRA-treated Foxc1l/l forebrains remained significantly longer (p<0.05) (Fig. 7M) and had significantly fewer (p<0.05) Ctip2+ cells than WT brains. In addition, atRA-treated Foxc1h/h and Foxc1h/l mutants showed significant improvement in neuron (Supp. Fig. 5C, D) and IPC (Supp. Fig. 5E, F) production as well as aPKCλ and Par3 expression (Supp. Fig. 5G, H) compared to untreated mutants.
To test whether atRA supplementation also improves production of later generated neurons, we fed pregnant mice an atRA-enriched diet that allowed longer treatment times. The diet was less teratogenic than daily injections of atRA and the atRA-diet rescued Foxc1h/h and Foxc1h/l mutants at E14.5 to the same extent as the injections (data not shown). The Foxc1h/1 mutant exposed to atRA from E10-E16.5 had a notable shorter, thicker cortex than the untreated mutant (Fig. 7O). Analysis of Ctip2+ and Brn2+ in the neocortex confirmed a substantial increase in both early and late-generated neurons in the atRA-exposed Foxc1h/1 mutant (Fig. 7P). The lengthening of the neocortex was also improved in the atRA exposed (E10-E18.5) Foxc1h/h brain (Fig. 7Q) as was generation of both Brn2+ and Ctip2+ neurons (Fig. 7R) however there was still evidence of laminar disorganization in the atRA-exposed Foxc1h/h cortex. This is consistent with the cortical dysplasia observed in E18.5 Foxc1h/h mutants caused by meningeal/basement membrane defects that are likely present in the atRA-treated mutants.
The development of the mammalian neocortex is remarkable in that a cohort of progenitors undergoes multiple rounds of division to produce a precisely defined set of distinct neuronal subtypes that occupy disparate cellular layers. The overall size of the cerebral cortex is controlled by the number of neuroepithelial progenitors generated via symmetric divisions and by the number of neurons that are generated from each progenitor via asymmetric divisions during the period of embryonic neuronogenesis (Caviness et al., 1995).
Though several proteins have been identified as central in the mechanics of the switch from symmetric to asymmetric divisions, few candidates have been identified that fit the criteria of a trigger event that signals to the VZ progenitors to begin undergoing neuronogenic divisions. The meninges are an ideal source of this signal, in part because their close proximity to the radial glial endfeet allows for a potent, short range signal that need not influence IPC proliferation events (IPCs do not make contact with the glial limitans) or maturation of projection neurons in the cortical plate. Further, we have shown that the maturation of the meninges is such that the cells that make meningeal-derived atRA appear in a lateral to medial gradient as predicted for a signal responsible for the neurogenic gradient. From an evolutionary perspective, it is possible that the expansion of the neuroepithelium that is required to make a larger neocortex not only relies on events intrinsic to the neocortical neuroepithelium but also upon the timing of meningeal development, specifically the arrival of atRA-producing cells.
From our work and the work of others, a model of atRA in forebrain development emerges. During forebrain patterning and the earliest stages of cortical development prior to the arrival of Raldh2/Rdh10 cells in the meninges, atRA diffuses from the Raldh2, 3 enriched facial mesenchyme. Once corticogenesis proceeds in earnest, a more local source of atRA in the form of Raldh2/Rdh10 meningeal cells is required for neurogenic stimulation as the developing cortex is now spatially separated from atRA sources in the face (Figure 7S).
The idea of the meninges as a source of developmental cues is not a new concept. Previous studies showed that Cxcl12, a chemokine ligand, produced by the innermost layer of the meninges regulates the positioning of cortical interneurons and Cajal-Retzius cells by acting as a chemoattractant during corticogenesis (Borrell and Marin, 2006; Li et al., 2008; Lopez-Bendito et al., 2008; Paredes et al., 2006). The outermost layer of the meninges, the dura, is involved in the formation of the skull by releasing TGFβ family members and FGF-2 to induce bone formation (Ito et al., 2003; Mehrara et al., 1999). That we have identified atRA is a key component of the neurogenic signal produced by the middle meningeal layer now implicates all layers of the embryonic meninges as sources of cues that regulate the development of surrounding tissues. Further, the cranial neural crest origin of the meninges, a key source of the tremendous diversity of head structures seen in vertebrates (Le Douarin et al., 2007; Santagati and Rijli, 2003), suggests that the meninges may be an additional component of this evolutionary paradigm.
There is a possibility that the phenotype of the Foxc1 mutants may be related to the vascular phenotype that is seen in these mice. For example, endothelial cells secrete factors like FGF that stimulate embryonic neural stem cells to undergo symmetric, self-renewing divisions (Shen et al., 2004). Foxc1, however, is expressed in pericytes and smooth muscle cells in the meninges and cortical vasculature but not by endothelial cells (J.A.S. & S.P., unpublished observations). Also, the vascular defects do not appear until after the cortical phenotype is apparent in the Foxc1 mutants. There may be a pericyte-derived factor that influences neurogenesis that is not produced in the absence of Foxc1. This is unlikely given that mouse mutants that have severely reduced pericyte numbers in the developing cortex do not have a cortical phenotype (Hellstrom et al., 2001).
atRA is an ideal molecule to induce neuronogenic divisions because it is a potent neural differentiation signal. Treatment of embryonic stem cells with atRA triggers upregulation of a series of neural specific genes that ultimately results in the production of both neurons and glia (Maden, 2001). Because it is such a strong neuronal induction cue, restricting atRA production to the meninges may prevent inappropriate atRA signaling. In support of this, CRABP I, II and CRBP1, proteins that bind and chaperone atRA and retinol, respectively (Napoli, 1999), are expressed by the meninges during development where they may further titrate atRA exposure of the radial glial endfeet (Ruberte et al., 1993). In addition, CRABP II is expressed in the VZ of the developing cortex (Ruberte et al., 1993) where it likely aids in the intracellular transport of atRA to the nucleus through the cytoplasm of the radial glial fiber. This model of restricted atRA exposure has already been established in the hindbrain. atRA signaling in hindbrain is limited to migrating cells and fixed structures adjacent to the regions of Raldh2-enriched meninges (Zhang et al., 2003).
Despite the fact that atRA is a well recognized cue for neuronal differentiation, a function for this molecule in neocortical development has been difficult to establish because the key mutants in the signaling pathways exhibit phenotypes at earlier stages of forebrain development and die before corticogenesis begins (Ribes et al., 2006). However, although not noted in the original publication, in RARα/γ double knockout the dorsal forebrain is elongated in a manner similar to the Rdh10 and Foxc1l/l mutants (Fig. 2h in (Lohnes et al., 1994). Also, vitamin A deprivation from E11 to E13 results in a reduction in post-mitotic neurons in the telencephalon (Dickman et al., 1997). This data is consistent with our analysis of the cortical phenotype in the Rdh10 mutants. The Rdh10 mutants appear to have meninges covering the cortex that presumable produce and secrete other meningeal derived cues like CXCL12 but are not capable of producing normal levels of atRA. This provides further evidence that atRA is the primary signal from the meninges regulating corticogenesis.
Transgenic retinoic acid response element-lacZ reporter mice (RARE-lacZ) are frequently used to assess retinoid signaling in the developing embryo and have a strong β-gal signal in radial glial cells in the forebrain (Haskell and LaMantia, 2005; Luo et al., 2004). Our analysis of the RARE-hsp68lacZ transgene (Rossant et al., 1991) in Foxc1+/l and Foxc1l/l brains revealed that most of the β-gal observed in the dorsal forebrain persists from transgene activation from an earlier developmental stage (data not shown). Indeed, Raldh2−/−;RARE-lacZ embryos, when given atRA to avoid early lethality, show persistent β-gal activity in the dorsal forebrain potentially resulting from early exposure to atRA produced from Raldh3-expressing olfactory placodes (Niederreither et al., 2002). In light of all the evidence implicating atRA in cortical development, our observation of low RARE-lacZ activation (as assayed by lacZ in situ probe) in the Foxc1+/l cortices is not an accurate picture of the role of atRA signaling during corticogenesis and thus is not useful in assessing whether atRA signaling is altered in the Foxc1l/l mutants. The low RARE-lacZ activation, despite the presence of atRA in the cortex, may be a result of the high levels of RARE repressive activity in the developing cortex, even in the presence of atRA which normally relieves transcriptional repression of RAREs by RAR/RXR heterodimers (Liao et al., 2005). Also, the two RARE-lacZ transgenes (RARE-hsp68lacZ (Rossant et al., 1991) and the RARE/tk/β-gal (Balkan et al., 1992)) both employ the RARE of the RARβ2 gene promoter. Previous studies showed that specific RAR/RXR co-factors are intimately involved in both the activation and repression of the RARE-specific to the RARβ2 promotor (Folkers et al., 1998). Thus the absence or overabundance of these co-factors in the forebrain likely influences the RARE-lacZ transgene activation and could lead to false positives and negatives with regard to retinoid signaling.
The Foxc1 mutants provide a unique opportunity to assess forebrain development in which a very discrete head structure, the forebrain meninges, is reduced or completely absent. As a result, we were able to identify a previously unknown role for the meninges: promotion of cortical neuron generation through release of a bioactive molecule. The identification of atRA as the bioactive signal from the meninges is compelling, providing impetus to pursue the details of atRA signaling in the VZ and to determine the mechanism of control of the neuronogenic decision by atRA at this time.
Details of animal breeding, atRA treatment and genotyping are found in the Supplementary Materials.
For cell cycle exit analysis, the pregnant dam was injected with BrdU (50 mg/kg b.w.) on E13. Fetuses were harvested 18 hours following the injection and the heads were processed for BrdU/Ki-67 double immunolabeling. The fraction of cells that had exited the cell cycle was estimated by counting the number of BrdU+ cells in a 200 m portion of the dorsal forebrain and the number of BrdU+/Ki-67- cells in the same area. The cell cycle exit fraction reported is the number of BrdU+/Ki-67- cells divided by the total number of BrdU+ cells. For analysis of the Tbr2 and Ctip2 population, the total number of Tbr2+ or Ctip2+ cells in a 200 μm portion of the dorsal forebrain was counted. Care was taken to ensure that the population analyzed was at a comparable rostral/caudal and lateral/medial position in each of the samples. Analysis of dorsal forebrain length consisted of measuring the length of the ventricular surface from the pallial-subpallial border to the tip of cortical hem in sections from a similar rostral/caudal position. For each untreated and atRA treated genotype, cell cycle exit, Tbr2, Ctip2 and cerebral length analysis was performed on sections from a minimum of three WT brains and three brains from each mutant line from a minimum of two separate litters (n≥2).
Detailed methods of explant methods and meningeal cultures are in Supplementary Material.
Raldh2 and Rdh10 in situ hybridization was performed as previously described (Zarbalis and Wurst, 2000). ISH with Rdh10 was performed using a 900 bases long DIG-labeled riboprobe comprising coding sequences and 3′-UTR. DIG-labeled riboprobe for Raldh2 was transcribed from a plasmid containing 937 bp of coding sequence and 3′-UTR kindly provided by Dr. John L.R. Rubenstein.
Whole embryo or whole head from E10.5-E16.5 were collected and fixed overnight at 4° C in 4% paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected and frozen in OCT. E18.5 heads were either fresh frozen in OCT or fixed as described above. Tissue was cryosectioned in 12 m increments. Immunostaining was performed as described previously (Zarbalis et al., 2007) using the following antibodies and concentrations: mouse anti-BrdU 1:50, BDBioscience; rat ant-BrdU 1:300, Novus; mouse anti-Tuj1 1:1000, Covance; rabbit anti-Zic 1:1500, gift from J. Aruga RIKEN Institute; rabbit anti-Raldh2 1:1000, gift from P. McCaffery, University of Aberdeen; rabbit anti-Ki-67 1:300, LabVision; rabbit anti-Tbr2 1:300, Chemicon; rat anti-Ctip2 1:800; Abcam; rabbit anti-Brn2 1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies; goat anti-Foxc1 1:300, Novus Biologicals; goat anti-Foxc2 1:300, Novus Biologicals. For x-gal staining, heads were fixed for 1 hour in 4% paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected and cut in 25 μm increments. Sections were stained overnight with 1 mg/ml x-gal solution (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). All immunofluorescent and brightfield images were captured using a Retiga CCD-cooled camera and associated QCapture Pro software (QImaging Surrey, BC Canada). For quantification of the Par3 and aPKCλ immunofluorescence, the mean grey value was calculated using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD) and the values were reported in the graphs as arbitrary units (a.u.). Analyzed images were from three brains from at least two litters for each genotype/treatment condition (n≥2).
For pairwise analysis of treatment conditions and/or genotypes, Student t-test’s were used. The SEM (+/−) is reported on all graphs.
We thank Dr. Grant Li for technical assistance and helpful discussions, Dr. Brad Pawlikowski for critical review of the manuscript and Drs. John Rubenstein, Arturo Alvarez-Buylla for helpful discussion. This work was supported by grants from the NIH (R01DA017627), Autism Speaks and the AHA/AAN.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.