PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbacterPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJB ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
J Bacteriol. 2009 November; 191(22): 6855–6864.
Published online 2009 September 11. doi:  10.1128/JB.00995-09
PMCID: PMC2772466

Global Transcriptional Response to Spermine, a Component of the Intramacrophage Environment, Reveals Regulation of Francisella Gene Expression through Insertion Sequence Elements[down-pointing small open triangle]

Abstract

Tularemia is caused by the category A biodefense agent Francisella tularensis. This bacterium is associated with diverse environments and a plethora of arthropod and mammalian hosts. How F. tularensis adapts to these different conditions, particularly the eukaryotic intracellular environment in which it replicates, is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the polyamines spermine and spermidine are environmental signals that alter bacterial stimulation of host cells. Genomewide analysis showed that F. tularensis LVS undergoes considerable changes in gene expression in response to spermine. Unexpectedly, analysis of gene expression showed that multiple members of two classes of Francisella insertion sequence (IS) elements, ISFtu1 and ISFtu2, and the genes adjacent to these elements were induced by spermine. Spermine was sufficient to activate transcription of these IS elements and of nearby genes in broth culture and in macrophages. Importantly, the virulent strain of F. tularensis, Schu S4, exhibited similar phenotypes of cytokine induction and gene regulation in response to spermine. Distinctions in gene expression changes between Schu S4 and LVS at one orthologous locus, however, correlated with differences in IS element location. Our results indicate that spermine and spermidine are novel triggers to alert F. tularensis of its eukaryotic host environment. The results reported here also identify an unexpected mechanism of gene regulation controlled by a spermine-responsive promoter contained within IS elements. Different arrangements of these mobile genetic elements among Francisella strains may contribute to virulence by conveying new expression patterns for genes from different strains.

Francisella tularensis is a formidable pathogen, leading to its designation as a category A biodefense agent (9). Among its many characteristics is the ability to replicate in macrophages (12). Upon infection of these cells, F. tularensis encounters molecular cues that alert this pathogen to its new environment. The ability of F. tularensis to detect and respond to environmental signals contributes to this organism's success as a pathogen. For example, conditions encountered within a mammalian host, including iron restriction, temperature change, and oxidative stress, induce the expression of genes critical to establishing a successful infection (8, 13, 16, 17, 22). Some of these cues can be mimicked in broth culture by eliciting protein expression patterns similar to those observed in vivo (15). Understanding the mechanisms by which F. tularensis adapts to its environment may provide insight into the pathogenicity of this organism.

An effective immune response to F. tularensis requires innate immunity. Proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and gamma interferon, play a major role in controlling Francisella infections (10). Both T-cell-deficient and scid mice exhibit heightened sensitivity to the F. tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) when depleted of these cytokines (11). Francisella inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines by macrophages, presumably as a means of evading innate immune defenses (4, 35, 36).

We have previously shown that the growth conditions for F. tularensis LVS affect both the production of a known virulence factor and the ability of the bacterium to inhibit macrophage cytokine production (4). The growth of LVS in a chemically defined medium (CDM) (5) elicits an inhibitory phenotype, while bacteria grown in Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth induce cytokine responses from macrophages (4). The chemical signals in CDM and MH broth responsible for these bacterial phenotypes are poorly understood.

Polyamines, among which are spermidine and spermine, are cationic compounds found in all living organisms. These molecules reach millimolar levels in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, and spermine is produced only by eukaryotes (19). Polyamines are associated with DNA synthesis, transcription, translation, and enzyme activity (33, 40). These molecules are known to induce global gene regulation in Escherichia coli, leading to optimal growth (39). Polyamines are also essential for biofilm formation in both Yersinia pestis and Vibrio cholerae (20, 26). Likewise, they contribute to Streptococcus pneumoniae virulence through an unknown mechanism (37).

Insertion sequence (IS) elements are small (<2.5-kb) mobile genetic elements that can enter into multiple sites within a given DNA molecule (24). These elements typically encode the transposase proteins required for their mobility in regions flanked by small inverted repeats (24). In Francisella species, there are several classes of IS elements, designated ISFtu1 to ISFtu6 (28). Of these classes, ISFtu1 and ISFtu2 are the most frequent IS elements in each of the F. tularensis genomes.

In this work, we have investigated the molecular mechanisms responsible for differential patterns of cytokine induction by F. tularensis (4). We have identified an environmental signal, the polyamines spermine and spermidine, that alters LVS behavior and have characterized the bacterial response to this signal. Using a genomewide transcriptome analysis, we found that transcription of the Francisella IS elements ISFtu1 and ISFtu2 increased in response to spermine. The IS elements were also sufficient to drive the expression of downstream genes in response to extracellular spermine. Further, we have shown that this response occurs in bacteria residing inside of macrophages, a relevant environment encountered by the bacterium during infection. In addition, we have found that the fully virulent strain Schu S4 exhibits similar responses. These results define a novel mechanism of gene regulation in this category A biodefense agent and have implications for other pathogens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Francisella strains and cultivation.

F. tularensis LVS was kindly provided by Karen Elkins (Food and Drug Administration). Schu S4 was obtained from the Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Repository (Manassas, VA). For macrophage infections, bacteria were grown on chocolate II agar for 1 to 3 days at 37°C and 5% CO2 prior to being inoculated into overnight broth cultures. MH broth supplemented with 0.1% glucose, 0.025% ferric pyrophosphate (Sigma), and IsoVitaleX (Becton Dickinson) was used for these cultures. For experiments including spermine, cultures were supplemented with 200 μM spermine (Sigma), an amount equal to that used in a CDM for the cultivation of F. tularensis, unless otherwise indicated (5). Spermidine, putrescine, and agmatine (all from Sigma) were dissolved according to the manufacturer's instructions, and cultures were supplemented with these compounds at 200 μM. Following overnight growth, bacteria were centrifuged, washed twice in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium, and suspended in infection medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with 1% human serum, 25 mM HEPES [Invitrogen], and 1× Glutamax [Invitrogen]). Bacteria were then diluted to an appropriate multiplicity of infection (MOI) prior to infection. All MOIs were confirmed by plating to enumerate viable CFU. All work involving Schu S4 was performed under biosafety level 3 conditions with approval from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Select Agent Program.

Macrophage culture and infection.

Macrophages were cultured as described previously (4). Unless otherwise indicated, macrophages were cocultured with bacteria at an MOI of approximately 10 for 24 h before supernatants were collected for analysis of cytokine levels. For fluorescence microscopy, macrophages were infected at an MOI of 100 for 1 h at 37°C. The high MOI was used to increase the percentage of infected macrophages (to >80%) following the short incubation. Macrophages were then treated with gentamicin (20 μg/ml) and washed three times with Hanks balanced salt solution to remove extracellular bacteria. All use of human-derived cells was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board.

For infections of RAW 264.7 cells, the cells were grown to about 80% confluence in 75-cm2 flasks (approximately 2 × 107 cells/flask) prior to infection. LVS was grown in MH broth overnight, washed, and suspended in macrophage infection medium. A portion of the washed bacteria was harvested at this point to obtain RNA for comparison to bacterial RNA recovered from the RAW 264.7 cells. RAW 264.7 cells were infected with LVS at an MOI of 500 for 2 h to establish a high infection rate. After this 2-h incubation, the cultures were treated with gentamicin (20 μg/ml) and washed three times with Hanks balanced salt solution to remove extracellular bacteria. After an additional 46 h, extracellular bacteria were washed away again using phosphate-buffered saline and RNA was isolated from the remaining RAW 264.7 cells.

ELISA analysis.

Macrophage supernatants, harvested 24 h following the introduction of bacteria, were subjected to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. TNF-α production was measured using a matched antibody pair and interleukin-12 (IL-12) p40 and IL-1β were measured using a DuoSet system (both from R&D Systems). Following the addition of tetramethylbenzidine substrate solution (Dako) and the measurement of optical density (OD) by using a Molecular Dynamics M2 plate reader, cytokine levels were calculated from a standard curve. The limit of detection for both ELISAs was 15 pg/ml. Levels of cytokines from macrophages exposed to bacteria grown in MH broth or MH broth with spermine were compared using Student's t test.

RNA harvest and analysis.

RNA was harvested from broth cultures by adding 5 ml of a 16-h culture directly to 15 ml TriReagent LS (Molecular Research Center). For RAW 264.7 cultures, 15 ml of TriReagent was added to the tissue culture flask after washing. RNA extraction continued with the addition of a one-fifth volume of chloroform, and then the aqueous phase was separated by centrifugation in a Phase Lock Heavy tube (Eppendorf). RNA was precipitated with isopropanol and subjected to centrifugation. Pellets were washed with 80% ethanol and resuspended in nuclease-free water. Fifty micrograms of the RNA-containing mixture was treated with DNase (Turbo DNA-free; Ambion) and subjected to ammonium acetate precipitation. The RNA quantity was measured by spectrophotometry, and RNA quality was measured with an Agilent bioanalyzer.

Microarray design.

Custom Francisella microarrays (described previously [17]) were designed using Agilent's eArray framework. All open reading frames (ORFs), including pseudogenes, from F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (Schu S4), F. tularensis subsp. holarctica LVS, F. tularensis subsp. holarctica OSU18, F. novicida U112, and the Francisella plasmids pOM1 and pFNL10 were included. Each gene from Schu S4, LVS, and OSU18 was spotted in duplicate onto the array, while the others were included as single copies.

Microarray target preparation and hybridization.

Synthesis of labeled target cDNA was performed using a mixture of 10 μg of total RNA, 0.5 μg of random hexamers (Invitrogen), and Moloney murine leukemia virus (Agilent). Target cDNA was labeled with Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated dUTP according to the protocol of the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Reaction mixtures were incubated at 40°C for 3 h. Following cDNA synthesis, the remaining RNA was hydrolyzed with 10 μl 1 N NaOH and 10 μl 0.5 M EDTA. The pH was then neutralized with 10 μl 1 M HCl, and the labeled cDNA was precipitated using ammonium acetate and isopropanol and washed with 80% ethanol. Samples of 0.5 μg of labeled cDNA were hybridized to custom Agilent microarrays with an 8 by 15,000 slide format according to the manufacturer's protocol, and the arrays were incubated at 60°C for 18 h in a rotary oven. Following hybridization, arrays were washed with Agilent wash buffers before being scanned on an Agilent microarray scanner (accession no. E-MEXP-2327).

Microarray data analysis.

Analysis of the microarray data was carried out using the Gene Expression Data Analysis tool (http://bioinformatics.upmc.edu/GE2/GEDA.html) (27). Briefly, this online software package was used for the normalization of data from individual arrays according to median intensity levels, followed by log2 transformation of the data. Data were grouped into categories, those for cultures with and without spermine, and subjected to J5 statistical analysis, which is designed for data sets with limited numbers of replicates and reduces the chances of false positives (27). Changes in gene expression were considered to be statistically significant if genes had a J5 score greater than 2. Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material report both the J5 values and degrees of change (n-fold) for genes with expression levels that changed significantly. Values for genes meeting these requirements were then entered into GenePattern (14), and the data are presented as a hierarchical clustering (Pearson correlation) of log2-transformed intensity values normalized with respect to medians for individual arrays. The microarray data are available in the ArrayExpress database.

Q-PCR.

cDNA synthesis was performed using SuperScript III (Invitrogen) and 1 μg of total RNA. Real-time reactions were performed with a 1:5,000 final dilution of template cDNA. Primer sets were designed using Primer3 (29), and reactions were carried out on a Bio-Rad IQ5 real-time machine using SYBR green (Bio-Rad). The bacterial 50S ribosomal protein L18 gene (FTL_0252) was used as the internal reference, as it was observed to have no change in expression according to microarray data (data not shown). The quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) data are presented as log2-transformed values expressing degrees of change (n-fold) between cultures in MH broth with spermine and those in MH broth alone.

Construction of ISFtu reporter constructs.

Constructs were designed using a red fluorescent protein, tdTomato (32), as a reporter to measure gene expression. ISFtu1 and ISFtu2 sequences were amplified from the LVS genome, along with 30- and 300-bp upstream sequences, respectively, by PCR. Upstream sequences that were included were chosen based on sequence homology among 10 representatives of each transposase element. ISFtu sequences were ligated into pRSETB-tdtomato using either XbaI (ISFtu1) or NheI (ISFtu2) sites and BamHI sites. The ISFtu-tdTomato fragment was then subcloned into pFNLTP8 by using either XbaI (ISFtu1) or NheI (ISFtu2) sites and EcoRI sites. Plasmids were introduced into F. tularensis by electroporation as reported previously (2). Briefly, F. tularensis LVS was grown to an OD600 of approximately 0.4 in 50 ml of Trypticase soy broth supplemented with 0.1% cysteine, washed three times with 500 mM sucrose, and resuspended in 4 ml of 500 mM sucrose. For electroporation, 1 μl (approximately 1 μg) of plasmid DNA was mixed with 50 μl of electrocompetent cells and the mixture was pulsed in a 0.2-cm-gap cuvette at 2.5 kV, 150 Ω, and 25 μF. Bacteria were immediately resuspended in 1 ml Trypticase soy broth supplemented with 0.1% cysteine and grown at 37°C for 4 h before selection on chocolate II agar plates supplemented with kanamycin (10 μg/ml). All vectors and primers used to create the reporter constructs are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Individual colony transformants were patched onto chocolate agar plates containing kanamycin. These patches were used to inoculate overnight cultures in MH broth either with or without supplemental spermine. Cultures were diluted twofold before the measurement of fluorescence and OD600 with a multilabel plate reader (Molecular Devices).

RESULTS

Human macrophage response to Francisella LVS following cultivation in the presence of spermine.

Previously, we have shown that F. tularensis LVS induces different macrophage responses depending on the medium used to cultivate the bacteria (4). Growth to high density in MH broth induces a bacterial phenotype that stimulates macrophages to produce high levels of cytokines (4). Alternately, high-density growth in CDM restores the parental LVS phenotype, which actively inhibits cytokine production by macrophages (4). One major difference between these two media is the presence of high levels of spermine in the CDM (5). Since polyamines have been shown to have significant effects on various processes in other bacteria (20, 26, 37, 39), we wanted to determine if the spermine component of CDM contributed to the LVS phenotype that inhibits macrophage activation. LVS was grown in CDM, MH broth, or MH broth supplemented with spermine at a concentration equal to that in CDM (200 μM), and bacteria from these cultures were tested for their ability to stimulate human monocyte-derived macrophages. Macrophages infected with bacteria that had been grown in MH broth alone produced more of the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α (Fig. (Fig.1A)1A) and IL-12 p40 (Fig. (Fig.1B)1B) than those infected with bacteria grown in other media, while macrophages infected with bacteria grown in CDM produced substantially less of these cytokines, consistent with our previous observations (4). Macrophages infected with bacteria grown in MH broth supplemented with spermine produced significantly less TNF-α and IL-12 and also IL-1β (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) than those infected with bacteria grown in MH broth alone (P < 0.01 for all cytokines tested). In a corollary experiment, the growth of LVS in CDM lacking spermine resulted in a significant increase in TNF-α induction compared to that by bacteria grown in complete CDM (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Importantly, the differences in cytokine production could not be attributed to defects in intracellular growth or bacterial viability because these factors did not differ if LVS was grown with or without spermine (data not shown).

FIG. 1.
Inhibition of macrophage cytokine response by Francisella grown in the presence of spermine. (A and B) TNF-α and IL-12 p40 production by human monocyte-derived macrophages following 24 h of culture with F. tularensis LVS grown in the indicated ...

To determine if spermine itself was acting directly with macrophages to affect cytokine production, the tissue culture medium was supplemented with this polyamine at the time of infection. We found that similar amounts of TNF-α were produced by macrophages in response to LVS grown in MH broth, whether or not spermine was added to the tissue culture medium (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). These data confirmed that the low proinflammatory cytokine production from macrophages infected with bacteria cultivated in spermine was due to a bacterial response to this polyamine.

To characterize the amount of spermine effective in inducing the observed phenotypic changes, cultures with several different spermine concentrations were set up. Bacteria were grown in MH broth supplemented with a range of spermine concentrations from 200 to 0 μM prior to the infection of macrophages. Reduced cytokine production was observed in response to bacteria grown in concentrations of spermine as low as 20 μM (Fig. (Fig.1C).1C). These data indicate that LVS responds to spermine concentrations approximately 2 orders of magnitude lower than the free spermine concentrations in eukaryotic cells (19).

Spermine and spermidine are the end products of polyamine biosynthetic pathways, while agmatine and the diamine putrescine are precursors in these pathways (34). Therefore, we sought to determine if other compounds from these pathways could also induce the low-cytokine-induction phenotype in LVS. Bacteria were grown in MH broth without additives or MH broth supplemented with 200 μM agmatine, putrescine, spermidine, or spermine. As seen previously, the growth of LVS in MH broth led to the highest levels of cytokine induction, while the growth of bacteria in MH broth with spermine failed to elicit the same response (Fig. (Fig.1D).1D). Similar to bacteria grown in the presence of spermine, bacteria cultivated with spermidine elicited significantly lower levels of TNF-α than those grown in MH broth alone. LVS bacteria grown with agmatine or putrescine behaved more like bacteria grown in MH broth only and elicited TNF-α production following macrophage infection (Fig. (Fig.1D).1D). Therefore, spermine and spermidine were sufficient to trigger a change in Francisella that altered host cell activation. Although bacteria are capable of synthesizing spermidine, we observed that exogenous spermine or spermidine added to the bacterial growth medium elicited this phenotype. Because of the similarity of responses to spermine and spermidine, spermine was used as a representative of these polyamines in subsequent experimentation.

Francisella gene expression changes in response to spermine.

The change in cytokine induction suggested that substantial alterations occurred in LVS in response to spermine. Therefore, we defined the bacterial response to spermine by global measurements of gene expression. RNA was isolated from LVS grown in MH broth with or without supplemental spermine (200 μM). The RNA was then used to produce labeled target cDNA that was hybridized to a custom Francisella microarray. Significant differences in gene expression between LVS cultures grown with and without spermine were identified using a J5 statistical test, which was chosen to limit false positives (27). Data for those genes whose expression was significantly altered in response to spermine were put into GenePattern (14) for hierarchical clustering (Fig. (Fig.2A).2A). The clustered data demonstrate a clear pattern of transcriptional regulation in response to extracellular spermine. Expression levels in LVS increased for 187 genes (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) and decreased for 75 genes (see Table S2 in the supplemental material) in response to spermine. This finding indicates that a substantial portion of the Francisella transcriptome changes in response to this environmental cue.

FIG. 2.
F. tularensis LVS gene expression changes induced by spermine. (A) Hierarchical clustering of genes identified as statistically significant by the J5 test across three independent microarray experiments (experiments 1 to 3 [exp. 1 to exp. 3]). Fluorescence ...

To examine the differentially regulated genes more closely, we categorized them based on their genomic annotation (21, 28). The categories chosen were as follows: annotated genes, those with known and annotated functions; hypothetical genes, those with unknown functions; pseudogenes, those annotated as pseudogenes for any reason; and transposase genes, those encoding any of the transposases found in the 109 IS elements located throughout the LVS genome (28). Upregulated genes included 44 annotated and 50 hypothetical genes, 54 pseudogenes, and 39 copies of the ISFtu2 transposase gene (Fig. (Fig.2B,2B, red bars). Conversely, genes with decreased expression included 51 annotated and 21 hypothetical genes, only 3 pseudogenes, and no transposases (Fig. (Fig.2B,2B, blue bars). This analysis was remarkable because relatively high numbers of pseudogenes and transposase genes were expressed in response to spermine. In addition, many of the upregulated genes were in proximity to IS elements in the chromosome. Ten unique probes were designed by using Agilent software to analyze all F. tularensis LVS IS elements in the genome. Since the sequences of all members of a class of IS elements are identical, it was not possible to generate unique oligonucleotides for every individual member. Nevertheless, the IS elements are likely coordinately regulated because of their sequence identity.

To confirm the microarray results, eight genes were chosen to represent both upregulated and downregulated transcripts for analysis by real-time Q-PCR. A list of these genes and their orthologs in the F. tularensis Schu S4 genome is given in Table Table1.1. Among the downregulated genes, a component of the polyamine transport (pot) system (potG), a predicted spermidine synthase gene (speE), and vacJ were chosen for validation. The transposase gene in ISFtu2, a gene encoding a hypothetical protein with homology to the product of lpxF from F. novicida (referred to herein as fsr1 [Francisella spermine response gene 1]), and an ORF encoding a hypothetical protein specific to Francisella (fsr2) were chosen from the list of induced genes. Two other genes of interest with J5 scores just below our cutoff were also examined by Q-PCR. These were another member of the annotated pot system, potF, and the transposase gene in the other predominant class of IS elements, ISFtu1. All of the genes tested by Q-PCR exhibited patterns of expression similar those seen in the microarray experiments (Fig. (Fig.2C),2C), validating the previous microarray results. These results also independently confirmed increased transcription of the transposase genes in the IS elements ISFtu1 and ISFtu2.

TABLE 1.
Gene orthologsa in F. tularensis strains

Role of Francisella IS elements in the response to spermine.

Since the expression of a large number of transposases increased in response to spermine, we investigated transcriptional regulation by the IS elements. Reporter constructs were created in which the sequence of a single copy of either ISFtu1 or ISFtu2 was cloned upstream of a promoterless allele for the red fluorescent protein tdTomato (32). The IS sequences used for these experiments included the annotated transposase ORF and the upstream sequence that was conserved among multiple ISFtu1 copies (30 bp) or ISFtu2 copies (300 bp) in the LVS genome (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). The ISFtu-tdTomato gene fusions were cloned into pFNLTP8 and transferred into LVS (25). Fluorescence levels were then examined following cultivation in MH broth with or without spermine. When F. tularensis LVS carrying these reporter constructs was grown in the presence of spermine, a six- to eightfold induction of fluorescence was observed (Fig. (Fig.3B).3B). Reporter constructs driven by either ISFtu1 or ISFtu2 behaved similarly, as predicted by the results of the gene expression experiments. In contrast, neither LVS alone (Fig. (Fig.3B)3B) nor LVS carrying a promoterless control vector (data not shown) was fluorescent after incubation with spermine.

FIG. 3.
F. tularensis LVS IS elements contain spermine-responsive promoters. (A) Schematic representation of the two predominant classes of F. tularensis IS elements. Transposase ORFs are indicated by arrows. Light gray boxes represent the conserved sequence ...

While the reporter constructs confirmed transcriptional activation of the IS element and a downstream red fluorescent protein allele, it was unclear if the IS elements directly regulated the expression of endogenous genes in the LVS chromosome. One possible mechanism for such an event would be the production of a polycistronic message emanating from the IS element that includes the downstream gene. To examine this, we performed reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) analyses of regions spanning the sequences of two genes shown to be regulated by spermine, FTL_1401 and FTL_1573, and the IS elements (ISFtu1 and ISFtu2, respectively) located directly upstream in the F. tularensis LVS genome (Fig. (Fig.3C).3C). RT-PCR analyses of these genes and their respective IS elements produced bands of the predicted size (~850 bp) (Fig. (Fig.3C).3C). In addition to showing that FTL_1401 and FTL_1573 were cotranscribed with their upstream IS elements, this semiquantitative technique showed increased levels of the polycistronic messages in LVS bacteria grown in the presence of spermine. Controls without a template (Fig. (Fig.3C)3C) and without RT (data not shown) confirmed that the RT-PCR amplicons were generated from RNA templates. Together with the microarray and Q-PCR data, these results show that the F. tularensis IS elements harbor spermine-responsive promoters.

Spermine-responsive genes are regulated during intramacrophage growth.

Because spermine is present at millimolar levels in the cytosol of eukaryotic cells (19), we hypothesized that the macrophage environment would activate transcription of spermine-responsive genes. To test this hypothesis, we utilized the murine cell line RAW 264.7 because the available number of primary human macrophages was inadequate to yield sufficient amounts of LVS RNA. LVS was grown within RAW 264.7 cells for 48 h as described in Materials and Methods. Then RNA was isolated and LVS gene expression levels were measured by Q-PCR. Patterns of gene expression changes induced by intramacrophage growth (Fig. (Fig.4A)4A) closely resembled those observed upon bacterial growth in MH broth supplemented with spermine (Fig. (Fig.2).2). While the magnitudes of gene expression changes differed slightly in some cases, the overall trends were identical to that observed for LVS cultured in MH broth plus spermine (Fig. (Fig.2C2C and and4A).4A). Although still induced, fsr2 exhibited a smaller increase in gene expression in macrophages than in broth medium supplemented with spermine. This finding may be the result of converging signals present in the macrophage cytosol, including reduced levels of iron and glucose, two cues that have been shown to affect Francisella gene expression (8, 18). Nevertheless, these results show that gene expression changes observed in response to spermine also occur during intramacrophage infection.

FIG. 4.
Regulation of spermine-responsive genes by LVS during intracellular growth. (A) LVS gene expression changes induced by growth in RAW 264.7 cells were examined using Q-PCR. The data are presented as log2-transformed change (n-fold) values comparing LVS ...

We next used the reporter constructs described above (Fig. (Fig.3)3) to investigate transcription from Francisella IS elements in human cells and validate the results obtained with RAW 264.7 cells. For these experiments, human macrophages were infected with LVS or strains bearing these reporter constructs and visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Induction of tdTomato expression was observed when the bacteria were located inside macrophages but not when the bacteria were extracellular (Fig. (Fig.4B).4B). Similar to bacteria in broth cultures, neither LVS alone nor LVS with a promoterless tdTomato construct exhibited fluorescence during macrophage infections (Fig. (Fig.4B4B and data not shown). These results are consistent with the possibility that the LVS response to spermine, specifically the activation of a cryptic promoter located within the IS elements, occurs during infection of human macrophages.

Response of virulent F. tularensis to spermine.

Since our experiments focused on LVS, it was unknown if similar phenotypes would be seen with a fully virulent strain of F. tularensis. We investigated the role of the spermine response in virulent Francisella by using the Schu S4 strain. We first examined macrophage cytokine production stimulated by Schu S4 following growth with or without spermine. As shown previously (Fig. (Fig.1),1), LVS bacteria grown in MH broth with spermine elicited a minimal TNF-α response while LVS bacteria grown in MH broth alone stimulated significantly higher cytokine production as measured by ELISA (Fig. (Fig.5A).5A). Schu S4 demonstrated similar behavior. When grown in the presence of spermine, Schu S4 stimulated substantially less TNF-α from the host macrophages than Schu S4 grown in MH broth alone (Fig. (Fig.5A).5A). Similar to the effects for LVS, the effects for Schu S4 were not limited to TNF-α since Schu S4 grown without spermine stimulated significantly more IL-1β production than Schu S4 grown with spermine (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).

FIG. 5.
Response of virulent F. tularensis Schu S4 to spermine. (A) Comparison of levels of TNF-α production by human monocyte-derived macrophages following exposure to either F. tularensis LVS or F. tularensis Schu S4 bacteria grown in the indicated ...

To further examine the spermine response in the virulent strain, we measured gene expression changes in Schu S4 bacteria grown in the presence and absence of spermine. RNA was isolated from Schu S4 cultures grown with or without 200 μM spermine, and the expression levels of several Schu S4 genes whose orthologs were identified in our microarray analysis using LVS (Fig. (Fig.2)2) were tested by Q-PCR. Schu S4 exhibited patterns of gene expression changes very similar to those in LVS in response to spermine. The Schu S4 orthologs of potG, potF, and speE were downregulated following growth in spermine, while fsr1 and fsr2 were upregulated (Fig. (Fig.5B).5B). Moreover, the expression of transposases encoded by the Schu S4 IS elements also increased following growth in spermine. In side-by-side cultures, we found that the levels of transposase mRNAs from ISFtu1 (Fig. (Fig.5B,5B, white bars) and ISFtu2 (Fig. (Fig.5B,5B, black bars) increased in both LVS and SchuS4 after growth in medium containing spermine (Fig. (Fig.5C).5C). Together, these results illustrate the commonality of spermine-induced responses between these two Francisella strains.

Since the IS elements appear to regulate transcription in response to spermine, we hypothesized that there would be differential gene expression patterns based on the locations of IS elements in different bacterial chromosomes. To investigate this possibility, we studied the expression of a spermine-regulated gene in LVS identified as fsr3 (Table (Table1).1). This gene was identified by microarray analysis as having higher transcript levels in LVS after spermine treatment. In addition, this gene is downstream of an ISFtu2 element in the LVS genome. The expression of genes near fsr3 in LVS was also induced by spermine, though these changes did not reach statistical significance in the microarray analysis. In contrast, the fsr3 ortholog in Schu S4 is not downstream of an IS element. As expected, culturing LVS with spermine increased the expression of fsr3 as measured by Q-PCR (Fig. (Fig.5D).5D). Schu S4, however, failed to increase the expression of its fsr3 ortholog, in fact showing a slight decline in this gene's expression level. Taken together, these data show that spermine responsiveness is conserved across these Francisella strains. In addition, F. tularensis IS elements contain promoter sequences that influence the transcription of downstream genes in response to this signal.

DISCUSSION

Although F. tularensis is a pathogen known to infect many cell types, the mechanisms involved in bacterial adaptation to its intracellular lifestyle have not been elucidated. Here, we have reported that spermine and spermidine, polyamines found in abundance in eukaryotic cells (19), dramatically alter cytokine induction by F. tularensis. Additional studies showed significant changes in the LVS transcriptome in response to spermine. We also present evidence that similar transcriptional changes occur during infection of macrophages, supporting the idea that Francisella recognizes polyamines as a signal of the intracellular environment.

Polyamine recognition is likely a component of a sophisticated system that integrates multiple environmental signals and regulates gene expression in Francisella (8, 17, 18). Wehrly et al. observed significant changes in gene expression during the growth of F. tularensis in macrophages, including multiphasic expression changes in genes within the pathogenicity island (38). Hazlett et al. demonstrated similar protein profiles when bacteria were grown in macrophages and in brain heart infusion broth (15). These conditions were associated with higher levels of intracellular growth locus proteins B and C (IglB and IglC), among others, but growth in MH broth was not. The bacterial response to spermine alters macrophage cytokine production and may be a component of the bacterial response to brain heart infusion broth, in which a similar cytokine phenotype was observed (15). The spermine response alone, however, does not account for the cumulative bacterial response to the macrophage cytoplasm. For example, our microarray data indicate that genes encoding IglA, IglC, and IglD are repressed by spermine (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). This finding is consistent with the early cytoplasmic phase defined by microarray analysis (38) but does not reflect the levels of IglC protein, for example (15, 38). Therefore, the gene expression changes we have defined in response to spermine are likely to be combined with responses to other signals that optimize mRNA levels, protein levels, and ultimately the replication of Francisella within host cells.

Global gene expression analysis using a comprehensive Francisella microarray provided key insights in our studies. One of the more unexpected findings was induction of the expression of transposase genes in the IS elements, specifically ISFtu1 and ISFtu2, by spermine (Fig. (Fig.22 and and4;4; see also Table S1 in the supplemental material). In addition, many of the nontransposase genes induced by spermine treatment were adjacent to the IS elements in the genome. This relationship led to the hypothesis that the IS elements carry a spermine-responsive promoter. The results of further experimentation using reporter constructs supported this hypothesis (Fig. (Fig.3).3). Although IS elements are typically associated with genetic rearrangements, other functions have been reported, including service as promoter elements for nearby genes (24). There are, however, no reports of the gene regulation in Francisella observed in the present study occurring on a global scale (23, 24, 30). Moreover, this is the first report of polyamines regulating transcription from IS elements.

The availability of different F. tularensis strains afforded us the opportunity to test important features of our system. The genome sequences of various Francisella subspecies contain over 100 IS elements; however, their genomic localization varies among subspecies (28). Both strains in our study, LVS and Schu S4, stimulated much less cytokine production from human macrophages when grown in the presence of spermine than in the absence of this polyamine, and these strains had similar patterns of gene expression when grown with spermine. Therefore, a mechanism by which F. tularensis disrupts innate immune cell activation is regulated by the spermine response and appears to be shared between these two strains. Studying the responses shared between LVS and Schu S4 will provide insight into this disruption of innate immune cell function. In at least one instance, however, gene expression patterns in LVS and Schu S4 following exposure to spermine were dissimilar (Fig. (Fig.5D).5D). This discrepancy indicates that gene regulation in response to spermine differs among various francisellae, in part due to IS element location. Unique IS element locations and the resulting changes in gene regulation may, therefore, contribute to the wide range of virulence levels exhibited by different Francisella strains in vivo. Global gene expression studies that compare spermine responses in LVS and Schu S4 will help delineate both the similarities and differences that characterize these strains.

We hypothesized that genes annotated as ABC transporter genes for polyamine uptake, potFGHI, controlled the spermine response that we have characterized. Transcription of these genes decreased following growth with supplemental spermine (Fig. (Fig.2;2; see also Table S2 in the supplemental material). This result was expected since less transport machinery would be required when extracellular spermine was abundant. To test the role of this putative polyamine transporter system, disruption mutations were created in the genes encoding the periplasmic binding protein (potF [FTL_1582]), the cytoplasmic ATP-binding protein (potG [FTL_0681]), and one of the two membrane proteins (potH [FTL_0682]). All of the mutants, however, retained a wild-type phenotype of cytokine induction or repression when grown in the presence or absence of spermine, respectively (data not shown). This finding suggests that spermine regulates Francisella through another mechanism, which is currently under rigorous investigation.

Polyamine effects on bacterial virulence are an emerging theme in host-pathogen interactions. As mentioned above, polyamines regulate biofilm formation in Vibrio and Yersinia (20, 26). It is also of interest that host polyamine synthesis pathways are activated by pathogens. The infection of mice with F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (1) and murine macrophages with Bacillus anthracis (3) increases the expression of host ornithine decarboxylase. This enzyme catalyzes a key early step in polyamine synthesis and is likely to result in spermine accumulation, potentially enhancing pathogen fitness in this environment. In anthrax infections, increased host ornithine decarboxylase activity is associated with the suppression of apoptosis of infected macrophages, thereby preserving the pathogen's niche (3). These observations, along with those presented in our study, suggest that pathogen responses to polyamines may be a common regulator of virulence and a potential target for therapeutics.

Our results suggest a model in which spermine and spermidine found in the macrophage cytosol elicit substantial changes in Francisella gene expression that culminate in little macrophage stimulation and low cytokine production. Francisella is known to be taken up into phagocytic vesicles (7), only to escape into the cytoplasm within a few hours (6, 7, 31). In our model, the bacterium encounters spermine and spermidine once it escapes from a phagosome and reaches the cytoplasm. Cytoplasmic polyamines may then trigger F. tularensis to alter its gene expression profile under the control, in part, of the many IS elements present in the Francisella genome. Though the mechanism by which the bacterium responds to polyamines and subsequently alters transcription remains to be determined, the result likely enables the bacterium to adapt to its new environment. Taken together, these data define a complex system of gene regulation in response to an intracellular environment that contributes to the overall success of this pathogen. Because other intracellular pathogens are likely to encounter elevated levels of polyamines within host cells, the adaptive response we have characterized for F. tularensis may be broadly relevant for bacterial pathogenesis.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

We thank Karen Elkins (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) for providing F. tularensis LVS and Thomas Zahrt and Roger Tsien for providing the vectors used in these studies.

This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health grants AI074402 and AI050018. J.H. is a recipient of T32 AI060525, “Immunology of Infectious Disease.”

Footnotes

[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 11 September 2009.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

1. Andersson, H., B. Hartmanova, R. Kuolee, P. Ryden, W. Conlan, W. Chen, and A. Sjostedt. 2006. Transcriptional profiling of host responses in mouse lungs following aerosol infection with type A Francisella tularensis. J. Med. Microbiol. 55:263-271. [PubMed]
2. Baron, G. S., S. V. Myltseva, and F. E. Nano. 1995. Electroporation of Francisella tularensis. Methods Mol. Biol. 47:149-154. [PubMed]
3. Bergman, N. H., K. D. Passalacqua, R. Gaspard, L. M. Shetron-Rama, J. Quackenbush, and P. C. Hanna. 2005. Murine macrophage transcriptional responses to Bacillus anthracis infection and intoxication. Infect. Immun. 73:1069-1080. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Carlson, P. E., Jr., J. A. Carroll, D. M. O'Dee, and G. J. Nau. 2007. Modulation of virulence factors in Francisella tularensis determines human macrophage responses. Microb. Pathog. 42:204-214. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Chamberlain, R. E. 1965. Evaluation of live tularemia vaccine prepared in a chemically defined medium. Appl. Microbiol. 13:232-235. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Checroun, C., T. D. Wehrly, E. R. Fischer, S. F. Hayes, and J. Celli. 2006. Autophagy-mediated reentry of Francisella tularensis into the endocytic compartment after cytoplasmic replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:14578-14583. [PubMed]
7. Clemens, D. L., B. Y. Lee, and M. A. Horwitz. 2004. Virulent and avirulent strains of Francisella tularensis prevent acidification and maturation of their phagosomes and escape into the cytoplasm in human macrophages. Infect. Immun. 72:3204-3217. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Deng, K., R. J. Blick, W. Liu, and E. J. Hansen. 2006. Identification of Francisella tularensis genes affected by iron limitation. Infect. Immun. 74:4224-4236. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Dennis, D. T., T. V. Inglesby, D. A. Henderson, J. G. Bartlett, M. S. Ascher, E. Eitzen, A. D. Fine, A. M. Friedlander, J. Hauer, M. Layton, S. R. Lillibridge, J. E. McDade, M. T. Osterholm, T. O'Toole, G. Parker, T. M. Perl, P. K. Russell, and K. Tonat. 2001. Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA 285:2763-2773. [PubMed]
10. Elkins, K. L., T. Rhinehart-Jones, C. A. Nacy, R. K. Winegar, and A. H. Fortier. 1993. T-cell-independent resistance to infection and generation of immunity to Francisella tularensis. Infect. Immun. 61:823-829. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Elkins, K. L., T. R. Rhinehart-Jones, S. J. Culkin, D. Yee, and R. K. Winegar. 1996. Minimal requirements for murine resistance to infection with Francisella tularensis LVS. Infect. Immun. 64:3288-3293. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Ellis, J., P. C. Oyston, M. Green, and R. W. Titball. 2002. Tularemia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:631-646. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Golovliov, I., M. Ericsson, G. Sandstrom, A. Tarnvik, and A. Sjostedt. 1997. Identification of proteins of Francisella tularensis induced during growth in macrophages and cloning of the gene encoding a prominently induced 23-kilodalton protein. Infect. Immun. 65:2183-2189. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Golub, T. R., D. K. Slonim, P. Tamayo, C. Huard, M. Gaasenbeek, J. P. Mesirov, H. Coller, M. L. Loh, J. R. Downing, M. A. Caligiuri, C. D. Bloomfield, and E. S. Lander. 1999. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286:531-537. [PubMed]
15. Hazlett, K. R., S. D. Caldon, D. G. McArthur, K. A. Cirillo, G. S. Kirimanjeswara, M. L. Magguilli, M. Malik, A. Shah, S. Broderick, I. Golovliov, D. W. Metzger, K. Rajan, T. J. Sellati, and D. J. Loegering. 2008. Adaptation of Francisella tularensis to the mammalian environment is governed by cues which can be mimicked in vitro. Infect. Immun. 76:4479-4488. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Hazlett, K. R., and K. A. Cirillo. 2009. Environmental adaptation of Francisella tularensis. Microbes Infect. 11:828-834. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Horzempa, J., P. E. Carlson, Jr., D. M. O'Dee, R. M. Shanks, and G. J. Nau. 2008. Global transcriptional response to mammalian temperature provides new insight into Francisella tularensis pathogenesis. BMC Microbiol. 8:172. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Horzempa, J., D. M. Tarwacki, P. E. Carlson, Jr., C. M. Robinson, and G. J. Nau. 2008. Characterization and application of a glucose-repressible promoter in Francisella tularensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:2161-2170. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Igarashi, K., and K. Kashiwagi. 2000. Polyamines: mysterious modulators of cellular functions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 271:559-564. [PubMed]
20. Karatan, E., T. R. Duncan, and P. I. Watnick. 2005. NspS, a predicted polyamine sensor, mediates activation of Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation by norspermidine. J. Bacteriol. 187:7434-7443. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Larsson, P., P. C. Oyston, P. Chain, M. C. Chu, M. Duffield, H. H. Fuxelius, E. Garcia, G. Halltorp, D. Johansson, K. E. Isherwood, P. D. Karp, E. Larsson, Y. Liu, S. Michell, J. Prior, R. Prior, S. Malfatti, A. Sjostedt, K. Svensson, N. Thompson, L. Vergez, J. K. Wagg, B. W. Wren, L. E. Lindler, S. G. Andersson, M. Forsman, and R. W. Titball. 2005. The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia. Nat. Genet. 37:153-159. [PubMed]
22. Lenco, J., I. Pavkova, M. Hubalek, and J. Stulik. 2005. Insights into the oxidative stress response in Francisella tularensis LVS and its mutant DeltaiglC1+2 by proteomics analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 246:47-54. [PubMed]
23. Luque, I., A. Andujar, L. Jia, G. Zabulon, N. T. de Marsac, E. Flores, and J. Houmard. 2006. Regulated expression of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase is directed by a mobile genetic element in the cyanobacterium Tolypothrix sp. PCC 7601. Mol. Microbiol. 60:1276-1288. [PubMed]
24. Mahillon, J., and M. Chandler. 1998. Insertion sequences. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:725-774. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Maier, T. M., A. Havig, M. Casey, F. E. Nano, D. W. Frank, and T. C. Zahrt. 2004. Construction and characterization of a highly efficient Francisella shuttle plasmid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:7511-7519. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Patel, C. N., B. W. Wortham, J. L. Lines, J. D. Fetherston, R. D. Perry, and M. A. Oliveira. 2006. Polyamines are essential for the formation of plague biofilm. J. Bacteriol. 188:2355-2363. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Patel, S., and J. Lyons-Weiler. 2004. caGEDA: a web application for the integrated analysis of global gene expression patterns in cancer. Appl. Bioinformatics 3:49-62. [PubMed]
28. Rohmer, L., C. Fong, S. Abmayr, M. Wasnick, T. J. Larson Freeman, M. Radey, T. Guina, K. Svensson, H. S. Hayden, M. Jacobs, L. A. Gallagher, C. Manoil, R. K. Ernst, B. Drees, D. Buckley, E. Haugen, D. Bovee, Y. Zhou, J. Chang, R. Levy, R. Lim, W. Gillett, D. Guenthener, A. Kang, S. A. Shaffer, G. Taylor, J. Chen, B. Gallis, D. A. D'Argenio, M. Forsman, M. V. Olson, D. R. Goodlett, R. Kaul, S. I. Miller, and M. J. Brittnacher. 2007. Comparison of Francisella tularensis genomes reveals evolutionary events associated with the emergence of human pathogenic strains. Genome Biol. 8:R102. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Rozen, S., and H. J. Skaletsky. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers, p. 365-386. In S. Krawetz and S. Misener (ed.), Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. [PubMed]
30. Safi, H., P. F. Barnes, D. L. Lakey, H. Shams, B. Samten, R. Vankayalapati, and S. T. Howard. 2004. IS6110 functions as a mobile, monocyte-activated promoter in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 52:999-1012. [PubMed]
31. Santic, M., M. Molmeret, K. E. Klose, S. Jones, and Y. A. Kwaik. 2005. The Francisella tularensis pathogenicity island protein IglC and its regulator MglA are essential for modulating phagosome biogenesis and subsequent bacterial escape into the cytoplasm. Cell. Microbiol. 7:969-979. [PubMed]
32. Shaner, N. C., R. E. Campbell, P. A. Steinbach, B. N. Giepmans, A. E. Palmer, and R. Y. Tsien. 2004. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:1567-1572. [PubMed]
33. Tabor, C. W., and H. Tabor. 1976. 1,4-Diaminobutane (putrescine), spermidine, and spermine. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 45:285-306. [PubMed]
34. Tabor, C. W., and H. Tabor. 1985. Polyamines in microorganisms. Microbiol. Rev. 49:81-99. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Telepnev, M., I. Golovliov, T. Grundstrom, A. Tarnvik, and A. Sjostedt. 2003. Francisella tularensis inhibits Toll-like receptor-mediated activation of intracellular signalling and secretion of TNF-alpha and IL-1 from murine macrophages. Cell. Microbiol. 5:41-51. [PubMed]
36. Telepnev, M., I. Golovliov, and A. Sjostedt. 2005. Francisella tularensis LVS initially activates but subsequently down-regulates intracellular signaling and cytokine secretion in mouse monocytic and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Microb. Pathog. 38:239-247. [PubMed]
37. Ware, D., Y. Jiang, W. Lin, and E. Swiatlo. 2006. Involvement of potD in Streptococcus pneumoniae polyamine transport and pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 74:352-361. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Wehrly, T. D., A. Chong, K. Virtaneva, D. E. Sturdevant, R. Child, J. A. Edwards, D. Brouwer, V. Nair, E. R. Fischer, L. Wicke, A. J. Curda, J. J. Kupko III, C. Martens, D. D. Crane, C. M. Bosio, S. F. Porcella, and J. Celli. 2009. Intracellular biology and virulence determinants of Francisella tularensis revealed by transcriptional profiling inside macrophages. Cell. Microbiol. 11:1128-1150. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Yoshida, M., K. Kashiwagi, A. Shigemasa, S. Taniguchi, K. Yamamoto, H. Makinoshima, A. Ishihama, and K. Igarashi. 2004. A unifying model for the role of polyamines in bacterial cell growth, the polyamine modulon. J. Biol. Chem. 279:46008-46013. [PubMed]
40. Young, D. V., and P. R. Srinivasan. 1972. Regulation of macromolecular synthesis by putrescine in a conditional Escherichia coli putrescine auxotroph. J. Bacteriol. 112:30-39. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)