In this cohort there were significant gender differences in key demographic and HIV disease characteristics at entry into the ART programme. Men were older and had more advanced disease, with lower CD4 cell counts and higher viral loads. These gender-associated disparities explained the higher mortality rate among men than women during early ART. During late ART, some baseline characteristics (age, CD4 count and monthly income) impacted on mortality in multivariate analysis, while others (including gender) did not. Having some monthly income significantly reduced the risk of mortality during later ART as well as the risk of being LTFU, independent of demographic and HIV disease characteristics.
This study took place in a large, well-maintained cohort. The counsellors ensured near-complete ascertainment of outcomes which strengthened findings related to death and LTFU. The division of study time into early and late ART allowed exploration of the changing impact of baseline disparities on survival. Although the characteristics of this programme, and the patients within it, are broadly representative of public sector ART services in sub-Saharan Africa, the generalisability of these results may be limited and the links between gender and ART programme outcomes requires investigation in other settings.
More women than men entered this ART programme, as in other developing countries (
Braitstein et al. 2006;
Muula et al. 2007;
Chen et al. 2008). In addition, men started treatment with more advanced disease than women, as has been reported in other African settings (
Boulle et al. 2008;
Braitstein et al. 2008;
Chen et al. 2008). These data demonstrate that late presentation of men resulted in increased mortality in the first four months on treatment. Thus, contrary to concerns that gender differentials may limit women’s access to ART, our study provided additional evidence that men may be particularly disadvantaged in access to treatment in resource-constrained settings (
Braitstein et al. 2008;
Keiser 2008). Previous studies have suggested a range of complex psycho-social reasons (
Braitstein et al. 2008;
Chen et al. 2008;
Keiser 2008). In addition, and perhaps more importantly, structural obstacles may prevent men from accessing health care services including ART (
Braitstein et al. 2008;
Keiser 2008). In South Africa, ART is offered through the primary health care (PHC) service, which offers preventive services aimed primarily at the needs of women, not men. PHC services need urgent attention to increase men’s exposure to health services, which is likely to increase their chances of earlier diagnosis and treatment.
Age played an important role in early and late survival in this ART programme. This has important implications as men generally enter the ART programme at later ages than women, and are often infected at an older age than women (
UNFPA. 2003). This provides additional evidence to support earlier diagnosis and treatment for men (
Lawn & Wood. 2006;
Braitstein et al. 2008).
The issue of patient retention in ART programmes is of major import in developing countries which are rapidly expanding access to HIV treatment. A recent systematic review found that African ART programmes retained about 60% of patients after two years on therapy (
Rosen et al. 2007). In Malawi, 50% of patients reported to be LTFU had actually died, most of them shortly after missing their last clinic visit (
Yu et al. 2007). Similarly, Braitstein (
Braitstein et al. 2006) suggests that with different assumptions of outcomes for those LTFU, true mortality in their study might have been as high as 15% and not 6.4%. The low rate of LTFU in Gugulethu, due to the active role of the Sizophila adherence counsellors, increases confidence in our findings. While it is vital to continue to enrol new patients on ART, programmes need to find ways to keep these patients on treatment.
Our finding that individuals with no monthly income experience poorer outcomes on ART has important programmatic implications for public ART programmes in Africa. The ART-LINC collaborative study (
Braitstein et al. 2006) found that free HIV treatment in low-income countries was highly protective against mortality (adjusted HR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08–0.78). In this cohort, as in all South African government ART roll-out sites, treatment was free. Despite this, monthly income was strongly associated with survival overall () and stratified by gender (). Income was also strongly associated with LTFU (). These findings suggest that even when treatment is free, having some income still impacts on outcomes on therapy. While the underlying mechanisms require further investigation, these associations are highly plausible: in a situation of limited resources, patients may have to choose, for example, between food for their family and transport to reach an ART clinic.
Socio-economic status is difficult to quantify and measure in the South African context where race-based denial of economic opportunities, and very high levels of inequality, further complicate commonly used definitions of socio-economic status such as income, education or employment (
Myer et al. 2004). Nonetheless, our binary measure of income demonstrated persistent associations with programme outcomes. The South African Government uses a household monthly income of ≤$100/month to indicate indigent families
f (
Marais et al. 2008). Using this definition, an estimated 57% of all South Africans were living below the poverty income line by 2001 (
Schwabe 2004). In this cohort, over half of the patients had no monthly income. For many of those patients who reported some monthly income, this was in the form of a government disability grant. Although there was no gender difference in the distribution of income, there was some interaction between gender and income (). Compared with women with no income, men with no monthly income had nearly twice the crude hazard of death (HR 1.89, 95% CI, 1.25–2.86; p=0.002). In addition, among women with some income compared with women with none, there was a 48% reduction in the crude hazard of LTFU (HR 0.52, 95% CI, 0.33–0.83; p=0.005). This finding persisted in multivariate analysis (adjusted HR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.36–0.90; p=0.015). Gender differences in the associations between income and outcomes on ART require further investigation, and highlight the importance of understanding social determinants of health for individuals in HIV care and treatment services. Socio-economic interventions (such as a basic income grant, as has been considered in South Africa) - either for HIV-infected individuals specifically or for all individuals below the poverty line - require further attention.
In summary, men entering this ART programme were older and had more advanced HIV disease than women. This late presentation resulted in increased early mortality on ART for men compared with women. Treatment programmes should prioritise earlier diagnosis and treatment of men. Further studies should explore the role of socio-economic factors in survival and patient retention in ART programmes in developing countries.