PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jdstLink to Publisher's site
 
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 May; 3(3): 585–592.
Published online 2009 May.
PMCID: PMC2769878

Review of Fructosyl Amino Acid Oxidase Engineering Research: A Glimpse into the Future of Hemoglobin A1c Biosensing

Stefano Ferri, Ph.D.,1 Seungsu Kim, M.Eng.,1 Wakako Tsugawa, Ph.D.,1,2 and Koji Sode, Ph.D.1,2

Abstract

Glycated proteins, particularly glycated hemoglobin A1c, are important markers for assessing the effectiveness of diabetes treatment. Convenient and reproducible assay systems based on the enzyme fructosyl amino acid oxidase (FAOD) have become attractive alternatives to conventional detection methods. We review the available FAOD-based assays for measurement of glycated proteins as well as the recent advances and future direction of FAOD research. Future research is expected to lead to the next generation of convenient, simple, and economical sensors for glycated protein, ideally suited for point-of-care treatment and self-monitoring applications.

Keywords: biosensing, fructosyl amino acid oxidase, glycated proteins, hemoglobin A1c, A1C, point-of-care treatment

Introduction

Hyperglycemia is responsible for most of the symptoms and long-term complications of diabetes. It is well recognized that adequate metabolic control of the blood glucose level in diabetes patients can delay and even prevent the onset of long-term complications.1 Adequate glycemic control also resulted in perceived improvements in overall quality of life.2 Early diagnosis and regular assessment of treatment effectiveness are therefore very important for the prevention of these serious complications.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose is an integral part of a structured self-management strategy for achieving target glycemic levels. However, assessing treatment effectiveness relies on a method that can determine the average blood glucose concentration over an extended period. Long-term hyperglycemia from poor glycemic control results in decreased concentrations of the nonmetabolizable sugar 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol (1,5-AG). Enzyme assay kits are available for measuring 1,5-AG in blood,3 providing an assessment of the overall glycemic control over the past few days to 2 weeks. Treatment assessment is also increasingly done by measuring glycated serum albumin, whose levels are proportional to the average blood glucose concentration of the preceding 1–2 weeks. However, by far the preferred method of evaluating the treatment effectiveness is measuring the glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1C), which has been for some time the gold standard for assessing long-term control of glycemic levels in diabetes patients. The American Diabetes Association currently recommends maintaining an A1C level below 7% of total hemoglobin.4

Glycated hemoglobin A1c is a hemoglobin molecule in which the N-terminal valine residue of the β subunit has been modified by blood glucose (Figure 1A). This modification, called glycation to distinguish it from the enzymatic glycosylation of proteins, is a nonenzymatic reaction of glucose with free amino groups, proceeding through a Schiff base intermediate to produce a relatively stable product. Easily separated from the unglycated form due to its lower pI value, A1C was initially identified as the most abundant of minor negatively charged hemoglobin components that eluted before the main hemoglobin peak during cation exchange chromatography.5 Even before it was determined to be modified with glucose, A1C was observed in significantly greater amounts in patients with diabetes.68 Due to the erythrocyte's long lifetime and the slow continuous and essentially irreversible characteristics of the glycation process,9 the relative amount of A1C reflects the average blood glucose concentration of the past 2–3 months.10,11

Figure 1.
The chemical reactions behind the synthesis and FAOD-based sensing of A1C. (A) The nonenzymatic glycation of the N-terminal valine residue of the hemoglobin β subunit, resulting in A1C. (B) Fructosyl-amino-acid-oxidase-catalyzed oxidation of f- ...

Clinical laboratories have been using a number of different A1C measurement systems, the major ones being ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), immunoassay, and boronate affinity chromatography. Immunological methods, which have recently become more popular, can be employed with clinical automated analyzers for measuring a large number of samples in a short time. However, this method is relatively costly, and its results are affected by the presence of hemoglobin variants. High-performance liquid chromatography methods, which are the most commonly used, offer high reproducibility and accuracy, and most are now unaffected by hemoglobin variants. However, HPLC methods involve expensive equipment, requiring specially trained staff and relatively long operating times.

Commercially available enzyme assay systems have offered an attractive alternative for conventional clinical tests for glycated proteins. These tests, based on the enzyme fructosyl amino acid oxidase (FAOD), are rapid and have been shown to be reproducible.1214 There is active research trying to improve the properties of this enzyme and developing novel FAOD-based detection systems. Fructosyl amino acid oxidase is expected to become a major component of glycated protein sensing and eventually be applied in simple, convenient, and economical detection systems for point-of-care treatment and self-monitoring applications. This article reviews past, current, and expected future research in the field of FAOD-based sensors for glycated protein.

Enzyme Properties of Fructosyl Amino Acid Oxidase

Fructosyl amino acid oxidase catalyzes the oxidation of the C–N bond linking the C1 of the fructosyl moiety and the nitrogen of the amino group of fructosyl amino acids (Figure 1B). The reaction proceeds to an unstable Schiff base intermediate, which hydrolyzes to produce glucosone and an amino acid. The enzyme's reduced flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) cofactor is then reoxidized by molecular oxygen with the release of hydrogen peroxide.

Fructosyl amino acid oxidases have been isolated from a number of different microorganisms, including bacteria,1517 filamentous fungi,1823 and marine yeast24 (Table 1). Based on conserved primary structural features, such as FAD-binding motifs, all FAODs are members of the glucose-methanol-choline oxidoreductase family. Fructosyl amino acid oxidases can be subdivided according to origins and substrate specificity. Prokaryotic and eukaryotic FAODs form two structurally distinct groups, with very low homology between the two groups.17

Table 1.
Properties of Reported Fructosyl Amino Acid Oxidases

While the physiological role of eukaryotic FAODs remains unknown, extensive studies have led to a good understanding of the physiological role of prokaryotic FAOD as the key enzyme in the catabolic pathway of naturally occurring fructosyl amino acids. The most extensive studies have been carried out on the plant pathogen, Rhizobium radiobacter (Agrobacterium tumefaciens).4246 R. radiobacter causes crown gall tumors on higher plants by transferring discrete DNA fragments from its tumor-inducing plasmid to the nuclei of infected cells. Expression of the transferred genes results in the synthesis of opines, which are specifically utilized as nutrient sources by R. radiobacter that have genes for the appropriate opine catabolism systems. One of the opines existing in crown gall is fructosyl glutamine,43 which is also called santhopine. Fructosyl amino acid oxidase serves as the key enzyme in the santhopine catabolic pathway. As the currently discovered prokaryotic FAODs from the genetically distinct bacteria Corynebacterium,15,25 R. radiobacter,16 and Arthrobacter17 share very high homology, these highly conserved FAOD genes have been suggested to have been distributed by horizontal gene transfer at some time during their evolution.17

Prokaryotic FAODs are homodimers and possess a noncovalently bound FAD cofactor. Prokaryotic FAODs are specific for α-fructosyl amino acids, which are amino acids glycated on their α amino group. Most eukaryotic FAODs are monomers with a covalently attached FAD cofactor. Eukaryotic FAODs can be divided into three groups according to substrate specificity: those specific for α-fructosyl amino acids, those specific for ε-fructosyl amino acids, and those that oxidize both α- and ε-fructosyl amino acids at comparable rates (Table 1). Although all FAODs are unable to oxidize large glycated peptides or intact glycated proteins, some of the α-fructosyl amino acid-specific FAODs have recently been shown to have relatively high activity toward fructosyl valyl histidine (f-αVal-His),21 which corresponds to the N-terminal fructosyl dipeptide derived from A1C. These enzymes are referred to as fructosyl peptide oxidase (FPOX).

Currently Available Enzyme-Based Technology for Glycated Protein Diagnosis

FAOD-based detection methods for glycated proteins have been commercially available since 1999 (Table 2). Because all FAODs are unable to react with intact glycated proteins, samples require an initial proteolytic digestion step to liberate glycated amino acids or glycated dipeptides. Current methods revolve around the same basic principle: (1) proteolytic digestion of samples, (2) FAOD reaction with liberated product, and (3) measurement of the resulting hydrogen peroxide using a peroxidase and a suitable chromogen.

Table 2.
Commercially Available Fructosyl-Amino-Acid-Oxidase-Based Assays for Measuring Glycated Proteins

Measurement of A1C is based on the measurement of the N-terminal fructosyl valine (f-αVal), while that of glycated albumin is based the measurement of fructosyl ε-lysine (f-εLys). It is important to measure only one of the two molecules according to the target protein. Many of these methods start with a separation step such as centrifugation; blood cells are used for the measurement of A1C, and serum is used for the measurement of glycated serum albumin. After proteolysis, an FAOD with an appropriate substrate specificity is used to help ensure that only molecules liberated from the target glycated protein are measured.

The CinQ HbA1c47 and Norudia N HbA1c48 systems use proteases that result in the liberation of the N-terminal glycated dipeptide f-αVal-His, which is then oxidized by an α-fructosyl amino acid-specific FPOX. The Direct Enzymatic A1C Assay14,49 relies on extensive proteolytic digestion to liberate f-αVal, which is measured by an FAOD referred to as fructosyl valine oxidase by the manufacturer. This FAOD appears to be an α-fructosyl amino acid-specific FAOD, as test results are unaffected by the presence of glycated albumin. The Lucica GA-L50 and GlyPro Reagent51 systems determine the levels of glycated albumin and fructosamine, respectively, by employing an ε-specific FAOD to measure the f-εLys liberated from the protease digestion step.

The FAOD-based assay systems have been adapted to be carried out on automated analyzers, allowing the possibility to conveniently and rapidly measure a large number of samples. FAOD-based assays seem to have the reproducibility and accuracy of HPLC methods, with the convenience of immunoassay methods. Furthermore, unlike the immunoassay-based methods, FAOD-based methods have been shown to be unaffected by the presence of hemoglobin variants.14

Biomolecular Engineering of Fructosyl Amino Acid Oxidase

Fructosyl-Amino-Acid-Oxidase-Based Sensor Development

An additional advantage of using FAOD to monitor glycated protein levels is that it has the potential of being applied in an amperometric sensor. Such sensors seem ideally suited for creating a simple, convenient, and economical method of measuring glycated proteins for point-of-care treatment or self-monitoring applications.

Our group has been engaged in the development of a variety of molecules and principles for glycated protein biosensing.44,5255 Especially, we developed several electrode systems to measure f-αVal employing the FAOD from the marine yeast Pichia N1-15658 (Figure 2) and the soil bacterium Arthrobacter FV1-1.59 The hydrogen peroxide sensor-based enzyme electrode and methoxy-5-methyl phenazinium methyl sulfate (mPMS) mediator-type enzyme sensor using carbon paste electrode exhibited good linear correlation.56 To avoid, hopefully, the problems of applying a large potential, we also created amperometric enzyme sensors with low applied potential using a Prussian blue film as an artificial peroxidase as well as employing peroxidase and ferrocene as electron mediator.57 The Prussian blue sensors not only avoided the inherent problems of measuring hydrogen peroxide with high applied potential, but also simplified the electrode construction compared to the two-enzyme construct. The hydrogen peroxide sensor-based enzyme electrode was also adapted to a flow-injection analysis system for measuring f-αVal.58 The hydrogen peroxide sensor-based enzyme electrode was also constructed using the FAOD from the soil bacterium Arthrobacter FV1-1.59

Figure 2.
Principle behind various experimental f-αVal sensors using the fructosyl amino acid oxidase from Pichia N1-1 FAOD. The sensor systems are based on (A) hydrogen peroxide detection,56 (B) mPMS mediator-type electrode,56 (C) FAOD-peroxidase-ferrocene ...

Protein Engineering of Fructosyl Amino Acid Oxidase

Several groups have used protein-engineering approaches to improve the properties of FAOD. By carrying out random mutagenesis and screening for potentially useful mutants using an in vivo colorimetric plate assay, researchers succeeded in enhancing the substrate specificity of fungal FAODs. The substitution of a single amino acid residue in the FAOD from Fusarium oxysporum caused a great decrease in activity with f-αVal while only slightly affecting its activity with f-εLys, thus greatly enhancing its f-εLys specificity.32 Similarly, substitution of one amino acid residue in the FAOD from Ulocladium sp. JS-103 resulted in a 14-fold greater preference for f-αVal compared to the wild-type enzyme.28

A different group also used random mutagenesis and in vivo colorimetric plate screening to improve FAOD thermostability. However, a directed evolution approach was used, whereby individual single mutations were combined to achieve cumulative improvements. By introducing a total of five mutations, the engineered Corynebacterium FAOD was stable at 45 °C, whereas the wild-type enzyme was unstable above 37 °C.26 Using the same directed evolution approach, a total of six amino acid substitutions were introduced to greatly improve the thermostability of a fungal (Coniochaeta sp.) FAOD; however, the effects of the mutations on the enzyme's specific activity have not been reported.60

Despite the absence of any three-dimensional FAOD structural information, our group has adopted a rational design approach to improve enzyme properties. We set out to improve the substrate specificity of the FAOD from the marine yeast Pichia N1-1, which naturally reacts with f-αVal and f-εLys at comparable rates. A three-dimensional structural model was created using as a template the crystal structure of a bacterial enzyme, Bacillus monomeric sarcosine oxidase, which shared significant similarities in primary structure.36 Docking studies based on this model identified which residues interacted with the potential substrates f-αVal and f-εLys (Figure 3).37 Residue Asn354, which interacts closely with f-εLys but not with f-αVal, was selected for site-directed mutagenesis studies. Substitution of Asn354 to histidine and lysine simultaneously increased the enzyme's activity toward f-αVal and decreased that toward f-εLys, thus greatly improving its specificity for f-αVal (Table 3). Substitution of residue His51 also produced mutants with significantly improved specificity for f-αVal (Table 3).38 A cumulative effect was observed by combining the As354 and His51 amino acid substitutions, producing an FAOD mutant with greatly improved f-αVal specificity.

Figure 3.
Docking models of (A) f-αVal and (B) f-εLys at the active site of the Pichia N1-1 FAOD.37 Hydrophobic residues are depicted in black, the FAD cofactor in thin lines, nitrogen atoms in blue, and oxygen atoms in red.
Table 3.
Kinetic Parameters of Purified Wild-Type and Mutant Fructosyl Amino Acid Oxidases

Future Direction

The three-dimensional structure of an FAOD (Amadoriase II) from the fungus, Aspergillus fumigates, was recently solved in the free and inhibitor-bound form.39 This crystal structure supports our predicted structural model and validates our rational design approach. This is expected to greatly contribute to future rational designing of any FAOD, providing useful information that can be applied to further improve stability, substrate specificity, or properties for specific sensor applications. The crystal structure identified a 12 Å deep catalytic site, providing a possible explanation for the inability of FAOD to oxidize large glycated peptides.39 Continued protein engineering investigations may lead to an increase in the size of acceptable substrates to hopefully eventually engineer an FAOD that is able to accept intact glycated proteins, thus making the proteolytic digestion unnecessary.

Fructosyl-amino-acid-oxidase-based sensors will be developed using the currently available enzymes together with technologies that have been well established for the self-monitoring of blood glucose. The combination of bioengineering approaches in diagnostic systems and the biomolecular engineering of FAOD can lead to the development of an accurate, rapid, convenient, and economical glycated protein biosensing system suitable for point-of-care treatment and personal use.

Abbreviations

1,5-AG
1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol
f-εLys
fructosyl ε-lysine
f-αVal
fructosyl valine
f-αVal-His
fructosyl valyl histidine
FAD
flavin adenine dinucleotide
FAOD
fructosyl amino acid oxidase
FPOX
fructosyl peptide oxidase
A1C
glycated hemoglobin A1c
HPLC
high-performance liquid chromatography
mPMS
methoxy-5-methyl phenazinium methyl sulfate

References

1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–986. [PubMed]
2. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Influence of intensive diabetes treatment on quality-of-life outcomes in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 1996;19(3):195–203. [PubMed]
3. Fukumura Y, Tajima S, Oshitani S, Ushijima Y, Kobayashi I, Hara F, Yamamoto S, Yabuuchi M. Fully enzymatic method for determining 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol in serum. Clin Chem. 1994;40(11 Pt 1):2013–2016. [PubMed]
4. American Diabetes Association. Position statement: standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:S13–S61. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Huisman TH, Meyering CA. Studies on the heterogeneity of hemoglobin. I. The heterogeneity of different human hemoglobin types in carboxymethylcellulose and in amberlite IRC-50 chroma-tography qualitative aspects. Clin Chim Acta. 1960;5:103–123. [PubMed]
6. Rajbar S. An abnormal hemoglobin in red cells of diabetics. Clin Chim Acta. 1968;22(2):296–298. [PubMed]
7. Trivelli LA, Ranney HM, Lai HT. Hemoglobin components in patients with diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1971;284(7):353–357. [PubMed]
8. Paulsen EP. Hemoglobin A1 C in childhood diabetes. Metabolism. 1973;22(2):269–271. [PubMed]
9. Bunn HF, Haney DN, Kamin S, Gabbay KH, Gallop PM. The biosynthesis of human hemoglobin A1c. Slow glycosylation of hemoglobin in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1976;57(6):1652–1659. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Nathan DM, Singer DE, Hurxthal K, Goodson JD. The clinical information value of the glycosylated hemoglobin assay. N Engl J Med. 1984;310(6):341–346. [PubMed]
11. Standing SJ, Taylor RP. Glycated haemogloban assessment of high capacity liquid chromatographic and immunoassay methods. Ann Clin Biochem. 1992;29(Pt 5):494–505. [PubMed]
12. Sakurabayashi I, Watano T, Yonehara S, Ishimaru K, Hirai K, Komori T, Yagi M. New enzymatic assay for glycohemoglobin. Clin Chem. 2003;49(2):269–274. [PubMed]
13. Hirokawa K, Nakamura K, Kajiyama N. Enzymes used for the determination of HbA1C. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;235(1):157–162. [PubMed]
14. Liu L, Hood S, Wang Y, Bezverkov R, Dou C, Datta A, Yuan C. Direct enzymatic assay for %HbA1c in human whole blood samples. Clin Biochem. 2008;41(7-8):576–583. [PubMed]
15. Horiuchi T, Kurokawa T, Saito N. Purification and properties of fructosyl-amino acid oxidase from Corynebacterium sp. 2-4-1. Agric Biol Chem. 1989;53(1):103–110.
16. Hirokawa K, Kajiyama N. Recombinant Agrobacterium AgaE-like protein with fructosyl amino acid oxidase activity. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2002;66(11):2323–2329. [PubMed]
17. Ferri S, Sakaguchi A, Goto H, Tsugawa W, Sode K. Isolation and characterization of a fructosyl-amine oxidase from an Arthrobacter sp. Biotechnol Lett. 2005;27(1):27–32. [PubMed]
18. Horiuchi T, Kurokawa T. Purification and properties of fructosylamine oxidase from Aspergillussp. 1005. Agric Biol Chem. 1991;55(2):333–338.
19. Yoshida N, Sakai Y, Serata M, Tani Y, Kato N. Distribution and properties of fructosyl amino acid oxidase in fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(12):4487–4489. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Yoshida N, Sakai Y, Isogai A, Fukuya H, Yagi M, Tani Y, Kato N. Primary structures of fungal fructosyl amino acid oxidases and their application to the measurement of glycated proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1996;242(3):499–505. [PubMed]
21. Takahashi M, Pischetsrieder M, Monnier VM. Isolation, purification, and characterization of amadoriase isoenzymes (fructosyl amine-oxygen oxidoreductase EC 1.5.3) from Aspergillussp. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(6):3437–3443. [PubMed]
22. Hirokawa K, Gomi K, Bakke M, Kajiyama N. Distribution and properties of novel deglycating enzymes for fructosyl peptide in fungi. Arch Microbiol. 2003;180(3):227–231. [PubMed]
23. Akazawa S, Karino T, Yoshida N, Katsuragi T, Tani Y. Functional analysis of fructosyl-amino acid oxidases of Aspergillus oryzae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(10):5882–5890. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Sode K, Ishimura F, Tsugawa W. Screening and characterization of fructosyl-valine-utilizing marine microorganisms. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 2001;3(2):126–132. [PubMed]
25. Sakaue R, Hiruma M, Kajiyama N, Koyama Y. Cloning and expression of fructosyl-amino acid oxidase gene from Corynebacterium sp. 2-4-1 in Escherichia coli. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2002;66(6):1256–1261. [PubMed]
26. Sakaue R, Kajiyama N. Thermostabilization of bacterial fructosyl-amino acid oxidase by directed evolution. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(1):139–145. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Sakai Y, Yoshida H, Yurimoto H, Yoshida N, Fukuya H, Takabe K, Kato N. Production of fungal fructosyl amino acid oxidase useful for diabetic diagnosis in the peroxisome Candida Boidinii. FEBS Lett. 1999;459(2):233–237. [PubMed]
28. Fujiwara M, Sumitani J, Koga S, Yoshioka I, Kouzuma T, Imamura S, Kawaguchi T, Arai M. Alteration of substrate specificity of fructosyl-amino acid oxidase from Ulocladium sp. JS-103. J Biosci Bioeng. 2006;102(3):241–243. [PubMed]
29. Hirokawa K, Gomi K, Kajiyama N. Molecular cloning and expression of novel fructosyl peptide oxidases and their application for the measurement of glycated protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;311(1):104–111. [PubMed]
30. Sakai Y, Yoshida N, Isogai A, Tani Y, Kato N. Purification and properties of fructosyl lysine oxidase from Fusarium oxysporum S-1F4. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1995;59(3):487–491. [PubMed]
31. Sakai Y, Yoshida N, Tani Y, Kato N. Production of fructosyl lysine oxidase from Fusarium oxysporum S-1F4 autoclave-browned medium. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1996;60(1):150–151. [PubMed]
32. Fujiwara M, Sumitani J, Koga S, Yoshioka I, Kouzuma T, Imamura S, Kawaguchi T, Arai M. Alteration of substrate specificity of fructosyl-amino acid oxidase from Fusarium oxysporum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74(4):813–819. [PubMed]
33. Takahashi M, Pischetsrieder M, Monnier VM. Molecular cloning and expression of amadoriase isoenzyme (fructosyl amine:oxygen oxidoreductase, EC1.5.3) from Aspergillus fumigatus. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(19):12505–12507. [PubMed]
34. Wu X, Takahashi M, Chen SG, Monnier VM. Cloning of amadoriase I isoenzyme from Aspergillus sp.: evidence of FAD covalently linked to Cys342. Biochemistry. 2000;39(6):1515–1521. [PubMed]
35. Wu X, Chen SG, Petrash JM, Monnier VM. Alteration of substrate selectivity through mutation of two arginine residues in the binding site of Amadoriase II from Aspergillussp. Biochemistry. 2002;41(13):4453–4458. [PubMed]
36. Miura S, Ferri S, Tsugawa W, Kim S, Sode K. Active site analysis of fructosyl amine oxidase using homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis. Biotechnol Lett. 2006;28(23):1895–1900. [PubMed]
37. Miura S, Ferri S, Tsugawa W, Kim S, Sode K. Development of fructosyl amine oxidase specific to fructosyl valine by site-directed mutagenesis. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2008;21(4):233–239. [PubMed]
38. Kim S, Miura S, Ferri S, Tsugawa W, Sode K. Cumulative effect of amino acid substitution for the development of fructosyl valine-specific fructosyl amine oxidase. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2009;44(1):52–56.
39. Collard F, Zhang J, Nemet I, Qanungo KR, Monnier VM, Yee VC. Crystal structure of the deglycating enzyme fructosamine oxidase (Amadoriase II) J Biol Chem. 2008;283(40):27007–27016. [PubMed]
40. Gerhardinger C, Marion MS, Rovner A, Glomb M, Monnier VM. Novel degradation pathway of glycated amino acids into free fructosamine by a Pseudomonassp. soil strain extract. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(1):218–224. [PubMed]
41. Saxena AK, Saxena P, Monnier VM. Purification and characterization of a membrane-bound deglycating enzyme (1-deoxyfructosyl alkyl amino acid oxidase, EC 1.5.3) from a Pseudomonas sp. soil strain. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(51):32803–32809. [PubMed]
42. Baek CH, Farrand SK, Lee KE, Park DK, Lee JK, Kim KS. Convergent evolution of Amadori opine catabolic systems in plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(2):513–524. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Kim KS, Baek CH, Lee JK, Yang JM, Farrand SK. Intracellular accumulation of mannopine, an opine produced by crown gall tumors, transiently inhibits growth of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2001;14(6):793–803. [PubMed]
44. Sakaguchi A, Ferri S, Sode K. SocA is a novel periplasmic binding protein for fructosyl amino acid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;336(4):1074–1080. [PubMed]
45. Vaudequin-Dransart V, Petit A, Poncet C, Ponsonnet C, Nesme X, Jones JB, Bouzar H, Chilton WS, Dessaux Y. Novel Ti plasmids in Agrobacterium strains isolated from fig tree and chrysanthemum tumors and their opine-like molecules. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1995;8(2):311–321. [PubMed]
46. Chilton WS, Stomp AM, Beringue V, Bouzar H, Vaudequin-Dransart V, Petit A, Dessaux Y. The chrysopine family of Amadori-type crown gall opines. Phytochemistry. 1995;40(3):619–628.
47. Shirata T, Noguchi N, Nakajima E, Ohnuma O, Igarashi M, Tominaga M, Tajima N. Evaluation of enzyme measurement kit for HbA1c “CinQ HbA1c.” Jpn J Med Technol. 2009;58(2):189–194. (In Japanese.)
48. Sekisui Medical Co. Ltd. Norudia N HbA1c. http://www.sekisuimedical.jp/english/business/diagnostics/biochemistry/hba1c/index.html. Accessed January 19, 2009.
49. Direct Enzymatic HbA1c Assay. http://www.sekisuimedical.jp/english/business/diagnostics/biochemistry/hba1c/index.html. Accessed January 19, 2009. [PubMed]
50. Lucica GA-L. http://www.asahi-kasei.co.jp/shindan/eng/ga-l/index.html. Accessed January 19, 2009.
52. Sode K, Takahashi Y, Ohta S, Tsugawa W, Yamazaki T. A new concept for the construction of an artificial dehydrogenase for fructosyl amine compounds and its application for an amperometric fructosyl amine sensor. Anal Chim Acta. 2001;435:151–156.
53. Yamazaki T, Ohta S, Yanai Y, Sode K. Molecular imprinting catalyst based artificial enzyme sensor for fructosylamines. Analytical Letters. 2003;36(1):75–89.
54. Sode K, Ohta S, Yanai Y, Yamazaki T. Construction of a molecular imprinting catalyst using target analogue template and its application for an amperometric fructosyl amine sensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2003;18(12):1485–1490. [PubMed]
55. Sakaguchi A, Ferri S, Tsugawa W, Sode K. Novel fluorescent sensing system for alpha-fructosyl amino acids based on engineered fructosyl amino acid binding protein. Biosens Bioelectron. 2007;22(9-10):1933–1938. [PubMed]
56. Tsugawa W, Ishimura F, Ogawa K, Sode K. Development of an enzyme sensor utilizing a novel fructosyl amine oxidase from a marine yeast. Electrochemistry. 2000;68(11):869–871.
57. Tsugawa W, Ogawa K, Ishimura F, Sode K. Fructosyl amine sensing based on Prussian blue modified enzyme electrode. Electrochemistry. 2001;69(12):973–975.
58. Ogawa K, Stöllner D, Scheller F, Warsinke A, Ishimura F, Tsugawa W, Ferri S, Sode K. Development of a flow-injection analysis (FIA) enzyme sensor for fructosyl amine monitoring. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2002;373(4-5):211–214. [PubMed]
59. Sakaguchi A, Tsugawa W, Ferri S, Sode K. Development of highly-sensitive fructosyl-valine enzyme sensor employing recombinant fructosyl amine oxidase. Electrochemistry. 2003;71(6):442–445.
60. Hirokawa K, Ichiyanagi A, Kajiyama N. Enhancement of thermostability of fungal deglycating enzymes by directed evolution. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;78(5):775–781. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Diabetes Technology Society