PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jdstLink to Publisher's site
 
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 May; 3(3): 562–567.
Published online 2009 May. doi:  10.1177/193229680900300322
PMCID: PMC2769870

Oral Insulin: The Rationale for This Approach and Current Developments

Ehud Arbit, M.D.1 and Miriam Kidron, Ph.D.1,2

Abstract

Insulin remains the most effective and durable hypoglycemic agent for the treatment of diabetes. The addition of an effective oral insulin dosage form to the antidiabetes armamentarium may have significant benefits in terms of fostering compliance and adherence among patients, as well as physiologic advantages due to the fact that such a dosage form replicates the natural route of insulin secretion and absorption through the portal vein and targets the liver directly. Several companies have developed technological platforms that protect polypeptides and proteins from enzymatic hydrolysis, enable their transport across the epithelial lining, and promote their absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. A review of the potential physiological rationale and advantages, as well as of current pertinent technologies used specifically with insulin, is herewith provided.

Keywords: diabetes, glucose metabolism, insulin, liver, oral antidiabetic medication, portal vein

Introduction

The introduction of insulin therapy was hailed as one of the therapeutic miracles of modern times, saving lives and preserving the health of millions of people worldwide. In the years since insulin was introduced, research on many fronts has resulted in significant developments in production, purification, and pharmaceutical formulation and in refinements in devices for parenteral insulin administration. Despite these advances, realizing the dream of administering insulin orally, and hence replicating physiological patterns of insulin secretion with the accompanying advantages, remains an elusive goal. Recent advances in science and technology have brought about methods to (1) overcome the barriers to absorption presented in the gastrointestinal tract and (2) protect the insulin while in transit in the harsh adverse environment of the gastrointestinal tract. This review addresses the physiological advantages that may be derived from oral insulin administration and examines the various technologies at the forefront of oral insulin delivery.

Potential Physiological Advantages of Insulin Delivery into the Portal Hepatic System

Normally, insulin is secreted from pancreatic β cells into the portal vein, which in turn ferries it directly into the liver. Up to 80% of secreted insulin is extracted on its first path through the liver and binds to insulin receptors.13 This large extraction gives rise to the “portal signal” and to the portal-peripheral gradient, a significantly (2.5- to 3-fold) higher insulin concentration in the portal vain as compared to that seen in systemic circulation. Oral insulin mimics this precise physiologic route as it is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract into the portal vein (to be differentiated from parenteral insulin, which is absorbed into the systemic circulation) and consequently may have salutary metabolic consequences due to direct engagement of the liver and resumption of its role in glucose metabolism.4 Furthermore, oral insulin is likely to convey additional advantages with plausible beneficial clinical ramifications, including the reduction of hyperinsulinemia, the forestalling of weight gain associated with systemic insulin therapy, and reducing the risk of hypoglycemia.

The liver, the portal signal, and glucose-stimulated insulin release are intertwined processes governing glucose metabolism.4,5 In healthy individuals, the liver assumes a pivotal role in maintaining euglycemia within a relatively narrow range. Following food ingestion, glycemia is regulated by three mechanisms, which include the suppression of hepatic glucose production (HGP), stimulation of hepatic glucose uptake, and induction of glucose uptake by peripheral tissue. In the postprandial state, the difference in the glucose excursion between a nondiabetic and a diabetic individual is accounted for by failure to adequately suppress hepatic glucose release in the latter6 (Figure 1). This is mainly because of insufficient or lack of insulin secretion in response to meal ingestion and failure to suppress glucagon release as occurs in diabetic patients.7 Hepatic extraction of glucose and glucose disposal in peripheral tissue in the diabetic individual remain intact and not different than in the nondiabetic individual.8

Figure 1.
Hepatic glucose output (HGO): role of (portal) insulin. Left: (1) nondiabetic individuals in postabsorptive (1A) and fed (1B) states. Right: (2) diabetic individuals (type 2 diabetes mellitus, T2DM) in postabsorptive (2A) and fed (2B) states. (1A) For ...

Similar to the postprandial state, in the fasting state, hyperglycemia is attributed to inadequate suppression of hepatic glucose output9,10 (Figure 1). Unrestrained hepatic glucose release is likely the consequence of insulin resistance and can be overcome with a relatively small increase in baseline hepatic sinusoidal insulin levels.9,11,12 This sinusoidal insulin increment can be achieved either by raising the portal insulin concentration, for example, by way of oral insulin, or by a conventional subcutaneous injection (systemic insulin). The latter is, however, an inefficient approach to suppress HGP as it requires over three times as much circulating insulin because of the difference in the anatomical contribution of the portal vein and hepatic artery to the total hepatic blood flow. Thus, exploiting the parenteral route to establish a relevant rise in portal insulin concentration needed to suppress HGP requires large amounts of insulin. It can be achieved, but only at the expense of creating peripheral hyperinsulinemia with the implication of increasing the risk of hypoglycemia, promoting lipogenesis, and possibly intensifying insulin resistance.1315

The role of the liver in buffering the entry of glucose from the portal vein into the systemic circulation to minimize large glucose fluctuations is well known, while its role in controlling the rate of insulin release into the circulation is less appreciated. The liver contains an adaptable mechanism that allows it to regulate systemic insulin levels by varying the amount it extracts from the portal vein. The fraction of intraportally infused insulin reaching the systemic circulation decreases with higher doses of insulin, and a reduction in hepatic insulin clearance results from the ingestion of oral glucose or a meal, thereby increasing the systemic availability of insulin.1,2,16,17 This mechanism enables the fine-tuning of insulin release into the systemic circulation, avoiding peaks and troughs in insulin concentrations and in glycemic excursions.

The suggestion that portal insulin delivery may be associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycemia and less erratic glucose swings has been gleaned from numerous studies. It has been observed in studies comparing insulin infusion into the peritoneal cavity versus infusion into the subcutaneous space (~50% of intraperitoneal substances are absorbed via the portal circulation) and from observational studies of diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis when insulin was administered together with the peritoneal dialysate.15,1823 Similar observations were made in patients receiving islet cells and pancreatic transplants. Indeed, the prime indication for performing these procedures was intractable hypoglycemia; in most cases, results were dramatic with resolution of hypoglycemic episodes.2427

One other area where portal (oral) insulin may act differently than parenteral insulin is in weight control. A number of mechanisms have been invoked as the cause of weight gain on initiating insulin therapy, including decreased glycosuria due to improved glycemic control, the anabolic effects of insulin itself, a decreased metabolic rate, and defensive overeating to prevent hypoglycemia. The anabolic effect mediated by high circulating levels of insulin most likely plays a role in weight gain, but its magnitude is not precisely determined. The deposition of fat is insulin dependent, and weight gain cannot occur when insulin deficiency is present, even if food is consumed in large amounts. In diabetic patients, weight gain is proportional to the intensity of treatment and is accounted for by an increase in nonlean muscle mass, i.e., fat. Furthermore, hyperinsulinemia has been implicated in shifting the anabolic balance toward lactate, the predominant gluconeogenic precursor, and glucose, when in excess, further fuels lipogenesis.28

Potential Problems with Oral Insulin

While oral insulin may have physiological advantages, it may raise problems inherent to oral medication in general. For instance, the rate and extent of absorption of an oral drug are often affected by food and may differ if the drug is administered shortly before a meal or after a meal (fed conditions) as compared to administration under fasting conditions. The optimal timing for oral insulin ingestion depends at least in part on the technology used for drug delivery and will need to be determined for each oral insulin in development. The food effect is likely to determine how the oral insulin will be used and for what indication.

One other issue is that all the polypeptide and protein delivery platforms developed thus far have relatively low bioavailability. Low bioavailability is a harbinger of significant inter- and intrasubject variability. A way to reduce variability is to increase the amount of insulin in the dosage form. Until recently such a proposition was impractical for insulin because of considerations. At the present time, however, the supply of insulin and its price can support such a strategy. Low bioavailability also implies that most of the insulin ingested is not absorbed and remains in the gastrointestinal tract. It is most likely that insulin retained in the gastrointestinal tract will be degraded by peptidases and proteases. Nevertheless, a concern that will need to be addressed in long-term safety studies is whether insulin, a known mitogen implicated in an increased risk of several cancers, including colon cancer, will increase the incidence of cancer when given orally.2931 Finally, while insulin per se may not be toxic, the chemical compounds employed in the various delivery systems as excipients or absorption promoters need to be deemed safe and effective in long-term toxicological and clinical studies.

Current Developments

Numerous attempts at creating an oral dosage of insulin have been made since the discovery of the hormone, but these were never consummated, largely because systems that protect insulin from enzymatic degradation and technologies that enable the transport of large molecules across the gastrointestinal epithelial lining and increase their absorption were nonexistent. Major advances in these areas, bolstered by the availability and lower cost of insulin, have prompted renewed interest in developing an oral insulin.

Several companies across the globe are developing oral insulin based on different technology platforms. Generic to all these efforts is a system that provides protection of the insulin while in transit in the gastrointestinal tract and which can take the form of physical encapsulation or the creation of a modified insulin resistant to degradation. In addition, some companies use an added component designed to enhance the transepithelial transport of the drug. Merrion Pharmaceuticals, a company based in Ireland, uses its GIPET® platform to deliver macromolecules and polypeptides, including insulin. The GIPET system is based on promoting drug absorption through the use of matrices consisting of medium-chain fatty acids and formulated as solid dosage forms. The matrices enjoy food additive status (Generally Recognized as Safe, GRAS) and are normal dietary components with long records of safe use. Insulin and the other ingredients are prepared as a physical mix and are formulated into a tablet designed to be released in the duodenum. Biocon Limited, a biotechnology company located in India, is continuing the work of Nobex Corporation, developing an oral insulin based on a modified form of insulin that possesses specific physicochemical characteristics that allow it to withstand enzymatic degradation in the stomach and facilitate its absorption. The conjugated insulin product (IN-105) is recombinant human insulin conjugated covalently with a monodisperse, short-chain methoxy polyethylene glycol derivative that is crystallized and lyophilized into the dry active pharmaceutical ingredient after purification.32 An ascending dose study in type 2 diabetes has been presented.33 Diasome, a U.S.-based company, is employing a hepatic-directed vesicle (HDV) for insulin delivery. A HDV consists of liposomes (≤150 nm diameter) encapsulating the insulin, which also contain a hepatocyte-targeting molecule in their lipid bilayer. The targeting molecule directs the delivery of the encapsulated insulin to the liver cells and therefore relatively minute amounts of insulin are required for effect. Diabetology Limited, a U.K.-based company, is using its Axcess™ delivery technology system, which is based on a capsule containing a simple mixture of the drug, an absorption enhancer, and a solubilizer that allows absorption of the drug in the small intestine. The excipients used in the formulation are inert (GRAS) and are normal dietary components with long records of safe use. The company recently presented the results of a phase II, 10-day repeat-dose study of oral insulin in 16 patients with type 2 diabetes.34 Emisphere Technologies, a U.S.-based company, uses a system of carriers—designed low molecular weight chemical entities—that interact weakly and noncovalently with a protein drug. By altering the protein conformation and increasing its lipophilicity the carriers are able to enhance the transport of the protein across the gastrointestinal epithelium and into the bloodstream.35 Oramed platform technology is based on components aimed at providing protection of the protein during passage through the gastrointestinal tract in combination with an absorption enhancer. Oramed's protectants and absorption enhancers consist of known pharmacopeia adjuvants with a long safety track record. Oramed has completed phase I trials in healthy volunteers; results have shown that oral insulin delivered with their system is safe, well tolerated, and consistently leads to a desired reduction in glucose and C-peptide (Figure 2).36

Figure 2.
Glucose, C-peptide, and insulin plasma concentrations vs time (150–300 minutes). An illustrative case from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study in healthy subjects: The capsule of oral insulin (8 mg insulin/capsule) given at time 0. After ...

Of note, two other routes of insulin delivery systems—buccal and inhaled—are being advanced. Generex Biotechnology developed an oral–buccal insulin formulation whereby insulin is delivered directly into the mouth via a metered dose spray (RapidMist device). The insulin is not absorbed through the portal system but rather is a systemic insulin. Generex's insulin has been approved and is available for clinical use in a few countries. MannKind is in phase III clinical trials with an inhaled insulin formulation based on designed microparticles optimized for inhalation deep into the lung.

Conclusion

Alternative routes to insulin injections are on the horizon. By replicating the physiological route of insulin secretion and absorption, oral insulin may have definite advantages not attained by systemic insulin administration, yet it may raise new concerns inherent to oral drug products that will need to be addressed. There is much anticipation among patients and clinicians for insulin provided by an alternative route that replaces injections. Such insulin would be a practical means to start insulin at a much earlier stage than currently practiced and will likely foster better long-term adherence and compliance, resulting in improved glycemic control in the population.

Abbreviations

GRAS
Generally Recognized as Safe
HDV
hepatic-directed vesicle
HGP
hepatic glucose production

References

1. Meier JJ, Holst JJ, Schmidt WE, Nauck MA. Reduction of hepatic insulin clearance after oral glucose ingestion is not mediated by glucagon-like peptide 1 or gastric inhibitory polypeptide in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007;293(3):E849–E856. [PubMed]
2. Eaton RP, Allen RC, Schade DS. Hepatic removal of insulin in normal man: dose response to endogenous insulin secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;56(6):1294–1300. [PubMed]
3. Meistas MT, Rendell M, Margolis S, Kowarski AA. Estimation of the secretion rate of insulin from the urinary excretion rate of C-peptide. Study in obese and diabetic subjects. Diabetes. 1982;31(5 Pt 1):449–453. [PubMed]
4. Satake S, Moore MC, Igawa K, Converse M, Farmer B, Neal DW, Cherrington AD. Direct and indirect effects of insulin on glucose uptake and storage by the liver. Diabetes. 2002;51(6):1663–1671. [PubMed]
5. Camacho RC, Pencek RR, Lacy DB, James FD, Wasserman DH. Suppression of endogenous glucose production by mild hyperinsulinemia during exercise is determined predominantly by portal venous insulin. Diabetes. 2004;53(2):285–293. [PubMed]
6. Mitrakou A, Kelley D, Mokan M, Veneman T, Pangburn T, Reilly J, Gerich J. Role of reduced suppression of glucose production and diminished early insulin release in impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(1):22–29. [PubMed]
7. Meyer C, Woerle HJ, Dostou JM, Welle SL, Gerich JE. Abnormal renal, hepatic, and muscle glucose metabolism following glucose ingestion in type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004;287(6):E1049–E1056. [PubMed]
8. Firth RG, Bell PM, Rizza RA. Effects of tolazamide and exogenous insulin on insulin action in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(20):1280–1286. [PubMed]
9. Cherrington AD, Sindelar D, Edgerton D, Steiner K, McGuinness OP. Physiological consequences of phasic insulin release in the normal animal. Diabetes. 2002;51(Suppl 1):S103–S108. [PubMed]
10. Sindelar DK, Chu CA, Venson P, Donahue EP, Neal DW, Cherrington AD. Basal hepatic glucose production is regulated by the portal vein insulin concentration. Diabetes. 1998;47(4):523–529. [PubMed]
11. Basu R, Basu A, Johnson CM, Schwenk WF, Rizza RA. Insulin dose-response curves for stimulation of splanchnic glucose uptake and suppression of endogenous glucose production differ in nondiabetic humans and are abnormal in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53(8):2042–2050. [PubMed]
12. Staehr P, Hother-Nielsen O, Levin K, Holst JJ, Beck-Nielsen H. Assessment of hepatic insulin action in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2001;50(6):1363–1370. [PubMed]
13. Kim SH, Reaven GM. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia: you can't have one without the other. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(7):1433–1438. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Bonora E, Capaldo B, Perin PC, Del Prato S, De Mattia G, Frittitta L, Frontoni S, Leonetti F, Luzi L, Marchesini G, Marini MA, Natali A, Paolisso G, Piatti PM, Pujia A, Solini A, Vettor R, Bonadonna RC. Group of Italian Scientists of Insulin Resistance (GISIR). Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are independently associated with plasma lipids, uric acid and blood pressure in non-diabetic subjects. The GISIR database. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;18(9):624–631. [PubMed]
15. Shishko PI, Kovalev PA, Goncharov VG, Zajarny IU. Comparison of peripheral and portal (via the umbilical vein) routes of insulin infusion in IDDM patients. Diabetes. 1992;41(9):1042–1049. [PubMed]
16. Shuster LT, Go VL, Rizza RA, O'Brien PC, Service FJ. Incretin effect due to increased secretion and decreased clearance of insulin in normal humans. Diabetes. 1988;37(2):200–203. [PubMed]
17. De Vos P, De Haan BJ, Vegter D, Hillebrands JL, Strubbe JH, Bruggink JE, Van Schilfgaarde R. Insulin levels after portal and systemic insulin infusion differ in a dose-dependent fashion. Horm Metab Res. 1998;30(12):721–725. [PubMed]
18. Jeandidier N, Selam JL, Renard E, Guerci B, Lassman-Vague V, Rocher L, Hanaire-Broutin H. Decreased severe hypoglycemia frequency during intraperitoneal insulin infusion using programmable implantable pumps. Evadiac Study Group. Diabetes Care. 1996;19(7):780. [PubMed]
19. Schade DS, Eaton RP, Friedman NM, Spencer WJ. Normalization of plasma insulin profiles with intraperitoneal insulin infusion in diabetic man. Diabetologia. 1980;19(1):35–39. [PubMed]
20. Selgas R, Diez JJ, Munoz J, Miranda B, de Alvaro F, Rodriguez JC. Comparative study of two different routes for insulin administration in CAPD diabetic patients. A multicenter study. Adv Perit Dial. 1989;5:181–184. [PubMed]
21. Scarpioni L, Ballocchi S, Castelli A, Scarpioni R. Insulin therapy in uremic diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; comparison of intraperitoneal and subcutaneous administration. Perit Dial Int. 1994;14(2):127–131. [PubMed]
22. Lahtela JT, Mustonen J, Pasternack A. Comparison of intraperitoneal and subcutaneous insulin administration on insulin sensitivity and serum lipids in type I diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis treatment. Clin Sci (Lond) 1995;88(4):427–432. [PubMed]
23. Hanaire-Broutin H, Broussolle C, Jeandidier N, Renard E, Guerci B, Haardt MJ, Lassmann-Vague V. Feasibility of intraperitoneal insulin therapy with programmable implantable pumps in IDDM. A multicenter study. The EVADIAC Study Group. Evaluation dans le Diabete du Traitement par Implants Actifs. Diabetes Care. 1995;18(3):388–392. [PubMed]
24. Luzi L, Hering BJ, Socci C, Raptis G, Battezzati A, Terruzzi I, Falqui L, Brandhorst H, Brandhorst D, Regalia E, Brambilla E, Secchi A, Perseghin G, Maffi P, Bianchi E, Mazzaferro V, Gennari L, Di Carlo V, Federlin K, Pozza G, Bretzel RG. Metabolic effects of successful intraportal islet transplantation in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(11):2611–2618. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Ryan EA, Shandro T, Green K, Paty BW, Senior PA, Bigam D, Shapiro AM, Vantyghem MC. Assessment of the severity of hypoglycemia and glycemic lability in type 1 diabetic subjects undergoing islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2004;53(4):955–962. [PubMed]
26. Fiorina P, Shapiro AM, Ricordi C, Secchi A. The clinical impact of islet transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(10):1990–1997. [PubMed]
27. Rickels MR, Schutta MH, Markmann JF, Barker CF, Naji A, Teff KL. β-Cell function following human islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54(1):100–106. [PubMed]
28. Perriello G, Jorde R, Nurjhan N, Stumvoll M, Dailey G, Jenssen T, Bier DM, Gerich JE. Estimation of glucose-alanine-lactateglutamine cycles in postabsorptive humans: role of skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 1995;269(3 Pt 1):E443–E450. [PubMed]
29. Giovannucci E. Insulin and colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 1995;6(2):164–179. [PubMed]
30. Argiles JM, Lopez-Soriano FJ. Insulin and cancer (Review) Int J Oncol. 2001;18(4):683–687. [PubMed]
31. Ish-Shalom D, Christoffersen CT, Vorwerk P, Sacerdoti-Sierra N, Shymko RM, Naor D, De Meyts P. Mitogenic properties of insulin and insulin analogues mediated by the insulin receptor. Diabetologia. 1997;40(Suppl 2):S25–S31. [PubMed]
32. Dave N, Hazra P, Khedkar A, Manjunath HS, Iyer H, Suryanarayanan S. Process and purification for manufacture of a modified insulin intended for oral delivery. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1177(2):282–286. [PubMed]
33. Iyer H, Khedkar AP, Suryanarayan S, Anand A, Vedala A, Krishnamurthy S, Arvind AS, Eshwaraiah A, Savale S, Prasanna Kumar KM, Arvind SR, Srikanta SS. Italy: European Association Study of Diabetes Rome; 2008. An open label, two period, placebo controlled, multiple dose study to evaluate the effect of food on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic of IN-105 10 mg in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.
34. Broke-Smith T, Luzio S, Lockett A, New R, Owens D. Repeat-dosing of oral insulin (capsulin) in persons with type 2 diabetes. European Association for the Study of Diabetes 44th Annual Meeting Rome; Italy. 2008.
35. Kidron M, Dinh S, Menachem Y, Abbas R, Variano B, Goldberg M, Arbit E, Bar-On H. A novel per-oral insulin formulation: proof of concept study in non-diabetic subjects. Diabet Med. 2004;21(4):354–357. [PubMed]
36. Kidron M, Raz IM, Wolfensberger M, Schwob H, Schruefer C. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of oral insulin in healthy subjects. American Diabetes Association, 68th Annual Meeting San Francisco; CA. 2008.

Articles from Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Diabetes Technology Society