PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jargspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
 
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009 August; 26(8): 433–436.
Published online 2009 September 3. doi:  10.1007/s10815-009-9337-3
PMCID: PMC2767484

Blastocyst transfer and gender: IVF versus ICSI

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the difference in sex ratio in our centre after day 5 embryo transfer among neonates delivered after fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF), fresh intra cytoplasmatic sperminjection (ICSI) and frozen embryo replacement (FER) compared to expected sex ratio in normal population.

Methods

Retrospective data after IVF/ICSI/FER therapy from 1995 – 2007 and data from the literature on similar subjects.

Results

Among a total of 420 births after day 5 transfer, there were 225 male and 195 female babies. However, after ICSI alone 30 were female and 21 male. Adding all available data from the literature on gender ratio after long term culture, the ratio of male births to total births (0.545) was significantly (p = 0.004) different from the expected ratio (0.515)

Conclusions

It appears that significantly more males are born than expected after day 5 transfer in IVF. However, a subgroup analysis in our data comparing IVF, ICSI and FER revealed more females born after ICSI and FER, suggesting that further research is needed in this area.

Keywords: Blastocyst culture, IVF/ICSI, Sequential culture media, Sex ratio

Introduction

Embryo selection for transfer in IVF/ICSI therapy is typically based on morphological criteria and rate of development. In animals, it has been demonstrated that the fastest growing embryos are more commonly male [22]. Several hypotheses have been addressed trying to explain this finding. Differences have been found regarding culture media conditions [12, 13], the maturation culture period of the oocyte [1], sperm damage [4] and epigenetic events which may modulate the difference between speed of development, metabolism and transcription, observed during preimplantation development between male and female embryos [5].

Some earlier studies in human ART (assisted reproduction technology) have shown that blastocyst transfer may favour male offspring [1721, 24, 29] while others did not come to the same conclusion [3, 16, 26, 27, 30]. However, reporting criteria are unclear as to selection between IVF and ICSI. Either they report only on IVF patients or a mixed group of IVF and ICSI patients.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective study from the IVF unit in Tromsø including all patients who gave birth after day 5 transfer from 1.1.1995–31.12.2007. Transfers earlier than day 5 were not included, and only sequential culture media were used. During the study period the sequential culture media were refined and the stimulation protocols changed slightly over the years; long downregulation with GnRH agonist and ovarian hyperstimulation with uFSH (urinary follicle stimulating hormone) or recFSH (recombinant FSH) being the main stimulation protocol. ICSI was started in 1996, but in the beginning blastocyst culture was not performed on these patients. DET (double embryo transfer) was the routine until 2005. Freezing of surplus blastocysts and eSET (elective single embryo transfer) was initiated in October 2005.

Studies in the literature about gender and IVF/ICSI/FER were identified by searching in medical databases and public browsers with relevant keywords.

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using contingency tables for χ²-test. P  0.05 was taken as significant.

Results

The ratio of male births to total births in Northern Europe and America is expected to be 0.515, varying from 0.5087 to 0.5173 [11]. The sex ratio in our data was 0.55 after day 5 transfer in IVF in contrast to 0.41 in ICSI and 0.25 in FER, although the study groups were small (Table 1). Including all data on sex ratio and long term culture in IVF therapy from available literature (Table 2), the sex ratio was significantly different (p = 0.0044) compared to the expected ratio. The p-value varied from p = 0.0006 to p = 0.0084 for an expected ratio of 0.5087 to 0.5173, respectively.

Table 1
Babies born after day 5 transfer, IVF unit Tromsø, 1995–2007
Table 2
Babies born after day 5 (4–6) transfer, published to date

Discussion

This study covers a 12 years period focusing on gender outcome after day 5 transfer in IVF, ICSI and FER. Conflicting results in the literature about sex ratio after long term culture gave the stimulus to analyse the results from our clinic, which has several years of experience (since 1994) with long term culture in human IVF, always using sequential culture media [6, 7, 14, 15].

We performed embryo transfer between day 2 and day 5. Only day 5 transfers were included in this study to insure, that at least small blastocysts or morulae were transferred and only the fastest growing embryos. Up to 2000, the embryos developed slower than in the refined media used thereafter. As a result, day 5 transfers during 1995 to 2000 included morulae. Due to the hypothesis that male embryos develop faster, these patients were included. Like in other studies we report an excess of males among infants born after IVF (Table 2). Adding all results from studies on this topic the difference is significant. Moreover, in our data we found more females born after ICSI and FER. However, our study groups are small and there is a need to expand these data in order to reach a firm conclusion.

In normally conceived pregnancies, the number of males exceeds that of females by a few percent at birth. In Europe and North America the male to female ratio (calculated as male live births divided by total live births) varies from 0.5087 in Mexico to 0.5173 in Greece [11]. Since all the studies published in English literature on sex ratio and long term embryo culture (Table 2) were from North America or Europe, we used the expected sex ratio of the study by Grech et al. to compare our data [11].

The results about sex ratio after ART are conflicting and interestingly the studies published so far do not differentiate between IVF and ICSI. They either find more males born after fresh blastocyst transfer compared to spontaneous conception [19] or compared to day 3 transfer [8, 17, 21], or they show no differences neither in sex ratio nor in growth rate of embryos [9, 23, 2628, 3032].

Alfarawati et al did a cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts and found that the majority of developmentally advanced blastocysts were male (3:1 ratio of male to female) [2]. Dumoulin et al. found a clear sex related growth difference in a study on growth rate of human preimplantation surplus blastocysts [10]. The sex related difference was significantly greater in ICSI than in IVF embryos.

ICSI is the method of choice in cases with reduced semen quality. Sperm DNA damage is associated with significantly lower IVF pregnancy rate [33, 34]. In an early study of Ray et al. on fresh surplus embryos after in vitro fertilization [25], 63 % of the blastocysts examined, were female. However, the number of cells in male embryos was significantly greater, pyruvate, glucose uptake and lactate production was significantly higher in male embryos. From the differences in the number of cells they extrapolated that female embryos are approximately 4.5 h delayed in their development from day 2 onwards compared with male embryos. They suggest that differences between males and females occur early, either at fertilization or during the first or second cleavage. FER is done with the “next best” embryos, the best ones being transferred in a fresh cycle. Day 5 freezing and FER implies a combination of selection by morphology and development (after IVF or ICSI with the respective implications) plus survival after thawing.

Our findings suggest that the sex ratio can be influenced by selecting embryos on the basis of morphological characteristics and the techniques used. However, there is a need for more research in this area.

Conclusion

Studies in humans and animals provide the biological evidence for differences between the different techniques used in ART, which could lead to different outcome than expected in normal population. Our data calls for re-examination of this question as it may represent yet another influence that human ART has, based on the techniques employed.

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest There is no conflict of interest for any of the submitting authors in reference to the submitted material.

Footnotes

Capsule

Day 5 embryo transfer after in vitro culture leads to significantly more male babies than expected in normal population, with differences between IVF and ICSI.

References

1. Agung B, Otoi T, Wongsrikeao P, et al. Effect of maturation culture period of oocytes on the sex ratio of in vitro fertilized bovine embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2006;52:123–7. [PubMed]
2. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Katz-Jaffe M, Schoolcraft WB, Munne S, Wells D. Comprehensive cytogenetic analysis of the blastocyst stage: the impact of aneuploidy on embryonic mophology. Human Reproduction, Abstracts of the 25 th Annual Meeting of ESHRE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 28 June - 1 July, 2009;24 supplement 1:i46–7.
3. Anderson M, Graham J, Tucker M, Krecko T, Levy M, Widra E. Comparison of gender and birth weight following day three and blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(Supplement 1):S179.
4. Bermejo-Alvarez P, Rizos D, Rath D, Lonergan P, Gutierrez-Adan A. Can bovine in vitro-matured oocytes selectively process X- or Y-sorted sperm differentially? Biol Reprod. 2008;79:594–7. [PubMed]
5. Bermejo-Alvarez P, Rizos D, Rath D, Lonergan P, Gutierrez-Adan A. Epigenetic differences between male and female bovine blastocysts produced in vitro. Physiol Genomics. 2008;32:264–72. [PubMed]
6. Bertheussen K. Growth of cells in a new defined protein-free medium. Cytotechnology. 1993;11:219–31. [PubMed]
7. Bertheussen K, Forsdahl F, Maltau JM. In vitro fertilization. New media for embryo culture to the blastocyst stage. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of in Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction, Vancouver (Canada), May 24–28: 1997;199–204.
8. Chang HJ, Lee JR, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH. Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008. [PubMed]
9. Csokmay JM, Hill MJ, Cioppettini FV, Miller KA, Scott RT, Jr., Frattarelli JL. Live birth sex ratios are not influenced by blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2008. [PubMed]
10. Dumoulin JC, Derhaag JG, Bras M, et al. Growth rate of human preimplantation embryos is sex dependent after ICSI but not after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:484–91. [PubMed]
11. Grech V, Savona-Ventura C, Vassallo-Agius P. Research pointers: Unexplained differences in sex ratios at birth in Europe and North America. BMJ. 2002;324:1010–1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Gutierrez-Adan A, Granados J, Pintado B, De La FJ. Influence of glucose on the sex ratio of bovine IVM/IVF embryos cultured in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2001;13:361–5. [PubMed]
13. Gutierrez-Adan A, Lonergan P, Rizos D, et al. Effect of the in vitro culture system on the kinetics of blastocyst development and sex ratio of bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 2001;55:1117–26. [PubMed]
14. Hentemann M, Bertheussen K. New media for culture to blastocyst. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:878–83. [PubMed]
15. Holst N, Bertheussen K, Forsdahl F, Hakonsen MB, Hansen LJ, Nielsen HI. Optimization and simplification of culture conditions in human in vitro fertilization (IVF) and preembryo replacement by serum-free media. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1990;7:47–53. [PubMed]
16. Kausche A, Jones GM, Trounson AO, Figueiredo F, MacLachlan V, Lolatgis N. Sex ratio and birth weights of infants born as a result of blastocyst transfers compared with early cleavage stage embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:688–93. [PubMed]
17. Luna M, Duke M, Copperman A, Grunfeld L, Sandler B, Barritt J. Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:519–23. [PubMed]
18. Meintjes M, Crider-Pirkle S, Ward D, Rodriguez J, Chantilis S, Madden J. Sex ratio and birth weight outcome when considering blastocyst expansion, multiple gestation, and facility. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(Supplement 1):S147.
19. Menezo YJ, Chouteau J, Torello J, Girard A, Veiga A. Birth weight and sex ratio after transfer at the blastocyst stage in humans. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:221–4. [PubMed]
20. Mercader A, Gamiz P, de los Santos M, Remohii J, Pellicer A. Sex ratio after day 2, day 3, or blastocyst transfer and cleavage stage transfer. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(Supplement 1):S261–2.
21. Milki AA, Jun SH, Hinckley MD, Westphal LW, Giudice LC, Behr B. Comparison of the sex ratio with blastocyst transfer and cleavage stage transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20:323–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Nedambale TL, Dinnyes A, Yang X, Tian XC. Bovine blastocyst development in vitro: timing, sex, and viability following vitrification. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:1671–6. [PubMed]
23. Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1139–46. [PubMed]
24. Quintans CJ, Donaldson MJ, Blanco LA, Sergio PR. Deviation in sex ratio after selective transfer of the most developed cocultured blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:403–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Ray PF, Conaghan J, Winston RM, Handyside AH. Increased number of cells and metabolic activity in male human preimplantation embryos following in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil. 1995;104:165–71. [PubMed]
26. Richter KS, Anderson M, Osborn BH. Selection for faster development does not bias sex ratios resulting from blastocyst embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:460–5. [PubMed]
27. Rodriguez HF, Bustillo M, La Palme J, Riley E, Eisermann J, Thompson K. Clinical outcomes with transfer of blastocyst or cleavage stage embryos: high order pregnancies, newborn weights and sex ratios. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(Supplement 1):S170.
28. Schwarzler P, Zech H, Auer M, et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2097–102. [PubMed]
29. Tarin JJ, Bernabeu R, Baviera A, Bonada M, Cano A. Sex selection may be inadvertently performed in in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programmes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2992–8. [PubMed]
30. Weston G, Osianlis T, Catt J, and Vollenhoven B. Blastocyst transfer does not cause a sex-ratio imbalance. Fertil Steril. 2008. [PubMed]
31. Wilson M, Hartke K, Kiehl M, Rodgers J, Brabec C, Lyles R. Integration of blastocyst transfer for all patients. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:693–6. [PubMed]
32. Wilson M, Hartke K, Kiehl M, Rodgers J, Brabec C, Lyles R. Transfer of blastocysts and morulae on day 5. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:327–33. [PubMed]
33. Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2663–8. [PubMed]
34. Zini A and Sigman M. Are Tests of Sperm DNA Damage Clinically Useful? Pros and Cons. J Androl. 2008. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC