Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Cancer Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 28.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2764818

Lupeol, A Novel Anti-inflammatory and Anti-cancer Dietary Triterpene


In the Western world, an average of 250 mg per day of triterpenes (member of phytosterol family), largely derived from vegetable oils, cereals, fruits and vegetables is consumed by humans. During the last decade, there has been an unprecedented escalation of interest in triterpenes due to their cholesterol-lowering properties and evidence of this phenomenon include at least 25 clinical studies, 20 patents and at least 10 major commercially triterpene-based products currently being sold all around the world. Lupeol a triterpene [also known as Fagarsterol] found in white cabbage, green pepper, strawberry, olive, mangoes and grapes was reported to possess beneficial effects as a therapeutic and preventive agent for a range of disorders. Last 15 years have seen tremendous efforts by researchers worldwide to develop this wonderful molecule for its clinical use for the treatment of variety of disorders. These studies also provide insight into the mechanism of action of Lupeol and suggest that it is a multi-target agent with immense anti-inflammatory potential targeting key molecular pathways which involve nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB), cFLIP, Fas, Kras, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt and Wnt/β-catenin in a variety of cells. It is noteworthy that Lupeol at its effective therapeutic doses exhibit no toxicity to normal cells and tissues. This mini review provides detailed account of preclinical studies conducted to determine the utility of Lupeol as a therapeutic and chemopreventive agent for the treatment of inflammation and cancer.

1. Introduction

There is a growing interest in natural triterpenoids, also known as phytosterols, due to their wide spectrum of biological activities [1]. Triterpenes are a wide-spread group of natural compounds with considerable practical significance which are produced by arrangement of squalene epoxide in a chair-chair- chair-boat arrangement followed by condensation [2]. Triterpenes are important structural components of plant membranes, and free triterpenes serve to stabilize phospholipid bilayers in plant cell membranes just as cholesterol does in animal cell membranes [2]. Most triterpenes contain 28 or 29 carbons and one or two carbon-carbon double bonds, typically one in the sterol nucleus and sometimes a second in the alkyl side chain [3]. Triterpenes are natural components of human diets. In the West, an average of 250 mg per day of triterpenes, largely derived from vegetable oils, cereals, fruits and vegetables is consumed [3]. There are reports which suggest that average triterpenoid intake is 30 mg/kg/day in the United States and based upon diet such as olive oil, the intake could reach 400 mg/kg/day in Mediterranean countries [3]. During the last decade, there has been an unprecedented escalation of interest in triterpenes. Most of this interest has focused on the cholesterol-lowering properties of triterpenes, and evidence of this phenomenon include at least 25 clinical studies, 20 patents and at least 10 major commercially triterpene-based products currently being sold all around the world [3]. It is estimated that well over 2400 subjects have taken part in clinical studies with different types of triterpenes with dosage up to 25 g or more per day with no adverse effect reported [3].

One such agent which has gained wide attention of medical professionals, pharmaceutical marketers and researchers all around the world, is a dietary triterpene known as Lupeol. This review provides detailed account of preclinical studies conducted to determine the utility of Lupeol as a therapeutic and chemopreventive agent for the treatment of inflammation and cancer.

2. Source of Lupeol

Lupeol, is found in vegetables such as white cabbage, pepper, cucumber, tomato, in fruits such as olive, fig, mango, strawberry, red grapes and in medicinal plants such as American ginseng, Shea butter plant, Tamarindus indica, Allanblackia monticola, Himatanthus sucuuba, Celastrus paniculatus, Zanthoxylum riedelianum, Leptadenia hastata, Crataeva nurvala, Bombax ceiba and Sebastiania adenophora used by native people in North America, Latin America , Japan, China, Africa and Caribbean islands [414]. The list of selected plants which have been reported to possess Lupeol in significant amounts is presented in Table 1. The quantification of Lupeol in fruits and medicinal plants has been performed and is summarized in Table 2.

Table 1
List of Selected Plants Containing Lupeol
Table 2
Content of Lupeol in Fruits and in Plants

3. Chemical Structure and Analysis

The chemical structure of Lupeol is presented in Figure 1. The chemical formula of Lupeol is C30H50O and its melting point is 215–216 °C. Properties computed from the structure of Lupeol show that it has a molecular weight of 426.7174 [g/mol], H-Bond donor 1, H-Bond acceptor 1, rotatable bond count 1, exact mass 426.386166, mono isotopic mass 426.386166, topological polar surface area 20.2, heavy atom count 31, formal charge 0, complexity 766, isotope atom count 0, defined atom stereo center count 10, and bonded unit count 1 (PubChem, NIH library, Compound ID 259846). The infra-red spectrum of Lupeol shows the presence of a hydroxyl function and an olefinic moiety which show their presence in the spectrum at 3235 and 1640 cm-1, respectively [6]. The molecular formula depicts the presence of six degrees of unsaturation, out of them one can be satisfied by an olefinic function. The presence of seven methyl singlets and an olefinic function in the 1H-NMR spectrum revealed that Lupeol is pentacylic triterpenoidal type in nature [6, 15]. Study conducted by Martelanc et al., using high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with UV and mass spectrometric [MS] showed that Lupeol exhibits a parent ion peak at m/z 409 [M+H-18][+]] [16].

figure nihms114280f1

3. An overview of Lupeol and its beneficial effects

Lupeol has been shown to exhibit various pharmacological activities under in vitro and in vivo conditions. These include its beneficial activity against inflammation, cancer, arthritis, diabetes, heart diseases, renal toxicity and hepatic toxicity [1775]. In this review, we will present evidence from published and unpublished preclinical studies about the role of Lupeol in alleviating inflammation and cancer. These are discussed as following:

3.1 Lupeol and Inflammation

Lupeol has been extensively studied for its inhibitory effects on inflammation under in vitro and in animal models of inflammation. A comprehensive study conducted by Fernández et al., showed that topical application of Lupeol (0.5 and 1 mg/ear) alleviated 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol acetate (TPA)-induced inflammation in an ear mouse model [17]. This study showed that topical application of Lupeol decreases myeloperoxidase levels [neutrophil specific marker] thus causing reduction in cell infiltration into inflamed tissues in mice [17]. The anti-inflammatory potential of Lupeol could be assessed from the observation that Lupeol pretreatment significantly reduced prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production in A23187-stimulated macrophages [17]. Another study by Fernández et al., has shown that Lupeol-rich extract of Pimenta racemosa plant (which is widely used by country doctors in Caribbean region to treat inflammatory ailments) exhibits significantly high anti-inflammatory activity in animal models [18]. This study showed that the anti-inflammatory behavior of the Lupeol-rich extract was similar to that exhibited by the selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor, Indomethacin [18].

Several studies were carried out to compare the anti-inflammatory efficacy of Lupeol with known anti-inflammatory agents. A comparative study by Nguemfo et al., for anti-inflammatory potential between Lupeol and a well known phytochemical α-Mangosteen [isolated from superfruit Mangosteen] was conducted in an animal model of carrageenan-induced inflammation [7]. Lupeol treatment (5–9.37 mg/kg) was reported to exhibit anti-inflammatory activity with a maximum inhibition of 57.14% while as α-mangostin at similar dose showed anti-inflammatory activity of 38.70% [7]. Similarly, Lupeol and its derivatives (linoleate, acetate and palmitate) were shown to exhibit higher anti-inflammatory activity than commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug indomethacin in rat and mouse models of inflammation [19, 2023].

Geetha et al., reported for the first time the utility of Lupeol to treat or reduce inflammation in a mouse model of arthritis, which is an inflammation associated disease [24]. The beneficial effect of Lupeol in treating inflammation in arthritic mice was shown to be associated with its potential to modulate immune system and the generation of inflammatory factors [24]. Lupeol was reported to suppress modulate the phagocytic activity of macrophages and T-lymphocytes, and suppresses CD4+T cell mediated cytokine generation in a mouse model [25]. Oral administration of Lupeol (12.5–200 mg/kg) resulted in the significant reduction in CD4+ T and CD8+ T cell counts and the level of cytokines (IL-2, IFN-gamma and IL-4) in arthritic mice [25]. A similar report by Latha et al., showed that increased activities of lysosomal enzymes and glycoproteins associated with decreased collagen in arthritic animals were significantly altered by Lupeol (50 mg/kg) feeding [26].

Another major development in establishing the anti-inflammatory potential of Lupeol was a recent study by Vasconcelos et al., where Lupeol was tested for the treatment of inflammation in a mouse model of bronchial asthma [27]. It is well established that asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways associated with a Th2 immune response. This study showed that Lupeol administration causes a significant reduction in cellularity and eosinophil levels in the broncho-alveolar fluid [27]. Treatment of Lupeol was also found to reduce the production of mucus and overall inflammation in the lungs [27]. The anti-inflammatory effect of Lupeol was observed to be equal to dexamethasone, a well known anti-inflammatory agent [27]. The latex from Himatanthus sucuuba is used in popular amazonian medicine as an anti-inflammatory remedy and Lupeol was observed to be an active constituent of this anti-inflammatory plant which at a dose of 100 mg/kg (p.o.) inhibited the edema and the abdominal constrictions by 50–40% and 57.9%, respectively in animals [8].

Several studies were carried out to understand the molecular mechanism through which Lupeol inhibits or abrogates the inflammatory processes under in vitro and in vivo situations and such studies provided several mechanistic facets of anti-inflammatory action of Lupeol. Lupeol was reported to modulate several molecules which directly or indirectly play a role in inflammatory process. Lupeol was shown to inhibit the activity of soybean lipoxygenase-1 (15-sLO) with IC50 equal to 35 μM [28]. Lupeol treatment (10–100 μM) is also shown to decrease the generation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and Interleukin β (ILβ) in lipopolysaccharide-treated macrophages [17]. Recent report by Yamashita et al., suggested that superoxide generation induced by arachidonic acid (AA) is suppressed by Lupeol in N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine(fMLP)-treated human neutrophils [29]. Further Lupeol treatment was observed to cause a reduction in the inflammation by decreasing levels of type II cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 in a bronchial asthma mouse model [27]. Recently, Lupeol was reported to exhibit significantly high wound healing potential in a dead space wound healing mouse model [30]. This study showed that Lupeol exerts its wound healing effect by decreasing the level of monocytes and docking with GSK3β protein [30]. The activation domain of GSK3β consisting of Tyr216, with residues Asn64, Gly65, Ser66, Phe67, Gly68, Val70, Lys85, Leu132, Val135, Asp181 in the active pocket, docked with Lupeol at the torsional degree of freedom 0.5 units [30]. Taken together, these compelling evidences suggest that the therapeutic usefulness of Lupeol for inflammatory conditions is attractive and warrants further investigation.

3.2 Lupeol and Cancer

Recent studies have shown that diets rich in phytochemicals can significantly reduce cancer risk by as much as 20% [2, 3132]. Epidemiological data suggest that the phytosterols content of the diet is associated with a reduction in common cancers including cancers of the colon, breast, and prostate [2, 3132]. Data emanating from molecular studies with various tumorigenic models suggest that phytosterols modulate host systems potentially enabling more robust antitumor responses such as enhancing immune recognition of tumor cells, altering hormone-dependent growth of endocrine tumors and modulating sterol biosynthesis [32 and references therein]. Reports suggest that the decreased risk for various cancers associated with high olive oil consumption may be associated with its rich triterpene content [33]. A number of triterpenoids have shown promise as antineoplastic agents and exhibit anti-proliferative activity when tested against various cancer cell lines [2, 3132]. These triterpenoids include members belong to the cycloartane, lupane, friedelane, dammarane, ursane, oleanane, limonoid and cucurbitacin family [2, 3444]. Recent reports showed that triterpenes directly inhibit tumor growth, cell cycle progression, and induce the apoptosis of tumor cells under in vitro and in vivo situations [32 and references therein]. Mutations that occur through DNA strand breaks have been shown to form the precursors of cancer development, and cells harboring mutations are at high risk to transform into neoplastic phenotype [4548]. During the course of tumorigenesis, mutations get accumulated thus transforming neoplastic cells into malignant carcinomas [4548]. It is noteworthy that Lupeol was reported to exhibit strong anti-mutagenic activity under in vitro and in vivo systems [49–50 and references therein]. Earlier reports have shown that Lupeol inhibits the chemically-induced DNA damage under in vitro conditions [51]. Study by Nigam et al., showed that topical application of Lupeol [200 μg/mouse] prevents 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene [DMBA]-induced DNA damage [DNA strand breaks] in murine skin [50]. Recently, Lupeol was shown to inhibit the Benzo[a]pyrene [B(a)P], a well-known mutagen-induced genotoxicity in a mouse model [52]. This study showed that pretreatment with Lupeol [1 mg/animal] for 7 days prior to B[a]P administration significantly decreased B[a]P-induced clastogenicity and caused an increase in mitotic index [52].

A broad program has been initiated at the School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison to study the beneficial effects of Lupeol for various cancer types such as prostate, skin, pancreatic and breast cancer. Earlier we provided evidence that Lupeol inhibits tumor promotion in two stage skin carcinogenesis in a mouse model [53]. Topical application of Lupeol [40 mg/kg/3 times a week] for 28 weeks was shown to significantly decrease tumor burden, tumor multiplicity and increase tumor latency period in the mouse model [53]. The anti-tumor promotion effects of Lupeol were observed to be associated with its potential to modulate signaling pathways such as nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K] /Akt (protein kinase B pathway), which are reported to play an important role during tumorigenesis [53 and references therein]. Tumor promoters {such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA)} are known to activate NFκB signaling thus resulting in the translocation of activated NFκB to the nucleus where it acts as a transcriptional factor [53–54 and references therein]. NFκB is known to activate several target genes which are required for the tumor growth [54 and references therein]. Lupeol was shown to significantly inhibit the NFκB translocation and its DNA binding activity in a mouse model of skin tumorigenesis [53]. Recent studies have shown the emergence of PI3K/Akt signaling as a potential molecular target for chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents [55]. We provided evidence that Lupeol ameliorates TPA-induced PI3K/Akt signaling in murine skin [53]. Further, Lupeol was observed to significantly inhibit the activity of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) protein which is a well known biomarker of tumor promotion [53, 56 and references therein]. These data suggested the chemopreventive potential of Lupeol against the development of skin cancer. We extended these studies to investigate the chemotherapeutic potential of Lupeol for treating human skin cancer under preclinical settings. For this purpose, Lupeol was tested against human melanoma tumor cells in vitro and in a xenograft athymic nude mouse model [57]. We showed that Lupeol inhibits growth of highly metastatic tumors of human melanoma origin by modulating ratio of Bcl-2 and Bax protein levels in vitro and in vivo [57]. The most important observation in this study was that no toxic effect on normal human melanocytes was observed at a dose at which Lupeol kills malignant melanoma cells. The data emanating from recent ongoing work in Dr. Hasan Mukhtar’s laboratory (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) show that Lupeol significantly inhibits the growth of metastatic melanoma cells harboring constitutive activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling (H. Mukhtar, personal communication). The potential of Lupeol to inhibit the growth or metastatic spread of melanoma cells is supported by a study conducted by Hata et al., where Lupeol was shown to significantly inhibit the migration of human melanoma cells through disassembling the actin cytoskeleton [58]. These studies suggest that Lupeol itself being non-toxic to normal cells could be used as a chemopreventive as well chemotherapeutic agent against skin cancer.

Recently studies have been carried out to investigate the structure–activity relationships of Lupeol in various human cancer cell lines [5961]. A study conducted by Aratanechemuge et al., showed that Lupeol induces apoptosis of human promyelotic HL-60 leukemia cells [59]. This study showed that Lupeol induces the formation of hypodiploid nuclei and fragmentation of DNA [a characteristic of apoptosis] in a dose and time dependent manner [59]. Recently, Cmoch et al., showed that Lupeol induces death of cancer cell lines of various histopathological origins, including T-lymphoblastic leukemia CEM (IC50 =50 μM), breast carcinoma MCF-7 [IC50 =50 μM], lung carcinoma A-549 (IC50 =50 μM), multiple myeloma RPMI 8226 (IC50 =50 μM), cervical carcinoma HeLa (IC50 =37 μM), and malignant melanoma G361 (IC50 =50 μM) when treated for 72 h [60]. Lupeol is also reported to inhibit the proliferation of the ERα-negative breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 [61]. In our ongoing program (which is focused on anti-cancer activity of Lupeol), we observed that Lupeol inhibits the growth of both ER+ ve and ER−ve types of breast cancer cells in a dose and time dependent manner [Saleem et al., unpublished data]. We also observed that Lupeol inhibits the growth of HER2 +ve breast cancer cells (Saleem et al., unpublished data).

Neo-angiogenesis is a hallmark of cancer invasion and metastasis [62 and references therein]. It is noteworthy that Lupeol (50- 30 μg/ml) is shown to exhibit anti-angiogenic property in an in vitro tube formation model of human umbilical venous endothelial cells [63]. Study by Hata et al., showing that Lupeol strongly inhibit the migration of human neuroblastoma and lung adenocarcinoma cells, further strengthen the belief that Lupeol could be developed as a broad-based anti-cancer agent [58]. Recently, Lupeol was shown to induce apoptotic death of pancreatic cancer cells harboring varied Kras status viz., Panc-1, BxPC-3 and AsPC-1 [64]. It is important to note that Lupeol exhibited more specificity towards highly malignant and invasive pancreatic cancer cells possessing mutated Kras (AsPC-1 and Panc-1) than lesser aggressive Bx-PC-3 harboring wild type Kras [64]. These data are significant because it is well established that more than 90% of pancreatic cancers harbor Kras mutation resulting in activation of intracellular signaling pathways which leads to proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells [64 and references]. The failure of known chemotherapeutic agents such as gemcitabine, cisplatin and TRAIL in against established tumors is known to stem from the upregulation of multiple molecular pathways. Ras oncoprotein was reported to activate the NF-κB/PI3K/Akt/MAPK signaling network thus conferring chemoresistance to pancreatic carcinoma cells [65 and references therein]. Lupeol has been shown to inhibit the PI3K/Akt and NFκB signaling network in pancreatic cancer cells [65]. We observed that Lupeol decreases the activity of Ras protein (GTP-bound Ras) in pancreatic cancer cells (Saleem et al., unpublished data).

According to the recent published reports, cFLIP has emerged as an important molecule other than NFκB that has gained prominence in conferring chemoresistance to cancer cells [64, 66]. Recently, Muratza et al., showed that Lupeol decreases the transcriptional activation of cFLIP gene as well its translational levels in pancreatic cancer cells [64]. Lupeol was shown to sensitize pancreatic cancer cells to TRAIL therapy [64]. This study showed that Lupeol treatment (40 mg/kg; 3 times/week) inhibits the growth of tumors originated from human pancreatic cancer cells (AsPC-1) implanted in a xenograft mouse model [64]. This study showed that the tumor growth inhibitory potential of Lupeol is associated with its ability to decrease the expression level of cFLIP protein in tumors under in vivo conditions [64]. Since Lupeol was shown to overcome the chemoresistance offered by cancer cells under in vivo condition, this study bears high relevance for human disease. Recently Lee et al., showed that Lupeol alone or in combination (with chemotherapeutic agents) could prove beneficial in the treatment of head and neck cancer in a mouse model [67]. Lee et al., showed that Lupeol preferentially caused the death of head and neck cancer cells but spared normal tongue fibroblast cells [64]. Lupeol [2 mg/animal] was not only found to suppress the tumor growth, but also to impair head and neck cancer cell invasion by targeting NFκB signaling [67]. Further, Lupeol was shown to significantly sensitize head and neck cancer cells to cisplatin chemotherapy in an orthotopic metastatic nude mouse model of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma [67]. Lupeol treatment was shown to dramatically suppressed local metastasis and that this effect was more than cisplatin alone [67].

Published reports from our laboratory and others suggested the efficacy of Lupeol against the growth of prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [6870]. We showed that Lupeol preferentially kills prostate cancer cells while spares normal prostate epithelial cells [68]. Recently, we showed that Lupeol (5–50 μM) inhibits the rate of proliferation of human prostate cancer cells irrespective of their androgen receptor status [69]. We also showed that Lupeol treatment (40 mg/kg) inhibits the growth of prostate cancer tumors of human origin implanted in a xenograft mouse model [68]. Notably, Lupeol was shown to decrease the serum-PSA levels [a clinical biomarker for prostate cancer] in mice implanted with human prostate tumors of human origin [68]. Computer based-chemical-protein interaction modeling studies have shown that Lupeol docks at the ligand binding domain of androgen receptor [Saleem M et al., unpublished data]. Androgens are the key factors in the initiation or progression of prostate cancer and are known to induce oxidative stress which is marked by the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and depletion in the levels of antioxidant enzymes [70]. Lupeol has been shown to inhibit the generation of ROS and restore the depleted antioxidant levels within prostatic tissue of androgen pretreated mice [70]. Studies with various cancer cells have shown that Lupeol adopts multipronged strategy to inhibit the growth of human cancer cells and by inducing apoptosis [6869]. The mechanistic pathways targeted by Lupeol in prostate cancer cells are Wnt/β-catenin signaling and Fas-apoptotic machinery [6869]. Lupeol was reported to decrease the expression level of several genes which are directly or indirectly associated with Wnt/β-catenin signaling in prostate cancer cells [69]. Lupeol was observed to target axin, GSK3β, MMP-2, ERBB-2 and c-myc [69]. Our ongoing studies have shown that Lupeol modulates the microtubule assembly and the protein level of its regulatory molecules such as Stathmin and Survivin in prostate cancer cells thus causing G2/M cell cycle arrest (Saleem et al., unpublished data). Our findings are supported by a recent study by Prasad et al., showing that Lupeol induces G2/M cell cycle arrest in cancer cells by inhibiting the cyclin regulated signaling pathway [71]. The chemotherapeutic potential of Lupeol was also tested against the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell SMMC7721 cells [72]. Lupeol treatment was shown to inhibit the growth and induce the apoptotic death of SMMC7721 cells [72]. This study showed that Lupeol-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis is due to down-regulation of DR3 expression in SMMC7721 cells [72].

4. Lupeol and Toxicity studies

Lupeol has been reported to exhibit no toxicity in animal studies [76 and references therein]. Lupeol administered orally in a dose of 2 g/kg has been reported to produce no adverse effects in rats and mice, and after 96 hours of observation no mortality was recorded (76 and references therein]. Lupeol tested at doses 40–200 mg/kg under various protocols (long or short-term treatment) did not show any systemic toxicity effect in animals [12, 53, 76 and references therein]. Lupeol (2 mg/animal, equivalent to 80 mg/kg) applied topically (3 times /week) for 28 weeks did not produce any toxicity in mice [53]. Al-Rehaily et al., performed acute toxicity study of Lupeol and reported that mice receiving oral administration of Lupeol (0.5– 40 mg/kg) for seven consecutive days did register no mortality or other toxic signs [77]. Oral administration of Lupeol (50 mg/kg) for consecutive 18 days did not produce any mortality or systemic toxicity in rats [12]. Recent studies showed that mice receiving intraperitoneal administration of Lupeol (40 mg/kg) did not show any sign of toxicity or mortality [54, 64, 6768]. A recent study by Sudhahar et al., showed that mice fed on Lupeol-supplemented diet (50 mg/kg/day) for 15 consecutive days did not produce any systemic toxicity [19]. Preetha et al., showed that oral administration of Lupeol (100 mg/kg) for 7 days did not cause mortality or any systemic toxicity in mice [78]. Taken together, these studies provide convincing evidence that Lupeol is a non-toxic but highly potent chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent.

5. Concluding Remarks

Several factors must be taken into consideration when the evidence for the inhibition of carcinogenesis and alleviation of other diseases by Lupeol is examined. These include the effective dose used and the time of exposure. Although animal studies have enhanced our understanding of the possible action of Lupeol in decreasing carcinogenesis and ameliorating inflammation, one must apply caution in extrapolating the information obtained in animal studies to humans, because of species differences. In order to evaluate the overall implications of Lupeol as a chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent, further studies are needed to fully identify its protective effects, as well as possible detrimental effects.


The original research on anti-cancer effects of Lupeol conducted in my program was supported by United States PHS grant R03 CA130064. I dedicate this manuscript to the excellent mentorship and consistent encouragement I have received from, Professor Hasan Mukhtar, Vice Chair, Department of Dermatology, the University of Wisconsin.


Conflicts of Interest

Statemnt None Declared

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.


1. Ovesná Z, Vachálková A, Horváthová K, Tóthová D. Pentacyclic triterpenoic acids: new chemoprotective compounds. Minireview Neoplasma. 2004;51:327–333. [PubMed]
2. Liby KT, Yore MM, Sporn MB. Triterpenoids and rexinoids as multifunctional agents for the prevention and treatment of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:357–369. [PubMed]
3. Moreau RA, Whitaker BD, Hicks KB. Phytosterols, phytostanols, and their conjugates in foods: structural diversity, quantitative analysis, and health-promoting uses. Prog Lipid Res. 2002;41:457–500. [PubMed]
4. Beveridge TH, Li TS, Drover JC. Phytosterol content in American ginseng seed oil. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:744–750. [PubMed]
5. Alander J, Andersson A. The shea butter family – the complete emollient range for skin care Formulations. Cos Toil Man Worldwide. 2005:28–32.
6. Imam S, Azhar I, Hasan MM, Ali MS, Ahmed SW. Two triterpenes lupanone and lupeol isolated and identified from Tamarindus indica linn. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2007;20:125–127. [PubMed]
7. Nguemfo EL, Dimo T, Dongmo AB, Azebaze AG, Alaoui K, Asongalem AE, et al. Anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory activities of some isolated constituents from the stem bark of Allanblackia monticola Staner L.C (Guttiferae) Inflammopharmacology. 2009;17:37–41. [PubMed]
8. de Miranda AL, Silva JR, Rezende CM, Neves JS, Parrini SC, Pinheiro ML, et al. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of the latex containing triterpenes from Himatanthus sucuuba. Planta Med. 2000;66:284–286. [PubMed]
9. Harish BG, Krishna V, Santosh Kumar HS, Khadeer Ahamed BM, Sharath R, Kumara Swamy HM. Wound healing activity and docking of glycogen-synthase-kinase-3-beta-protein with isolated triterpenoid lupeol in rats. Phytomedicine. 2008;15:763–767. [PubMed]
10. Lima LM, Perazzo FF, Tavares Carvalho JC, Bastos JK. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of the ethanolic extracts from Zanthoxylum riedelianum (Rutaceae) leaves and stem bark. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2007;59:1151–1158. [PubMed]
11. Nikiéma JB, Vanhaelen-Fastré R, Vanhaelen M, Fontaine J, De Graef C, Heenen M. Effects of antiinflammatory triterpenes isolated from Leptadenia hastata latex on keratinocyte proliferation. Phytother Res. 2001;15:131–134. [PubMed]
12. Geetha T, Varalakshmi P, Latha RM. Effect of triterpenes from Crataeva nurvala stem bark on lipid peroxidation in adjuvant induced arthritis in rats. Pharmacol Res. 1998;37:191–195. [PubMed]
13. You YJ, Nam NH, Kim Y, Bae KH, Ahn BZ. Antiangiogenic activity of lupeol from Bombax ceiba. Phytother Res. 2003;17:341–344. [PubMed]
14. Macías-Rubalcava ML, Hernández-Bautista BE, Jiménez-Estrada M, Cruz-Ortega R, Anaya AL. Pentacyclic triterpenes with selective bioactivity from Sebastiania adenophora leaves, Euphorbiaceae. J Chem Ecol. 2007;33:147–156. [PubMed]
15. Du SJ, Gariboldi P, Jommi G. Constituents of Shashen (Adenophora axilliflora) Planta Med. 1986;52:317–320. [PubMed]
16. Martelanc M, Vovk I, Simonovska B. Determination of three major triterpenoids in epicuticular wax of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV and mass spectrometric detection. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1164:145–152. [PubMed]
17. Fernández MA, de las Heras B, García MD, Sáenz MT, Villar A. New insights into the mechanism of action of the anti-inflammatory triterpene lupeol. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2001;53:1533–1539. [PubMed]
18. Fernández A, Alvarez A, García MD, Sáenz MT. Anti-inflammatory effect of Pimenta racemosa var. ozua and isolation of the triterpene lupeol. Farmaco. 2001;56:335–338. [PubMed]
19. Sudhahar V, Ashok Kumar S, Varalakshmi P, Sujatha V. Protective effect of lupeol and lupeol linoleate in hypercholesterolemia associated renal damage. Mol Cell Biochem. 2008;317:11–20. [PubMed]
20. Lima LM, Perazzo FF, Tavares Carvalho JC, Bastos JK. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of the ethanolic extracts from Zanthoxylum riedelianum (Rutaceae) leaves and stem bark. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2007;59:1151–1158. [PubMed]
21. Akihisa T, Yasukawa K, Oinuma H, Kasahara Y, Yamanouchi S, Takido M, et al. Triterpene alcohols from the flowers of compositae and their anti-inflammatory effects. Phytochemistry. 1996;43:1255–1260. [PubMed]
22. Davis RH, DiDonato JJ, Johnson RW, Stewart CB. Aloe vera, ydrocortisone and sterol influence on wound tensile strength and anti-inflammation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1994;84:614–621. [PubMed]
23. Ramirez Apan AA, Pérez-Castorena AL, de Vivar AR. Anti-inflammatory constituents of Mortonia greggii Gray. Z Naturforsch [C] 2004;59:237–243. [PubMed]
24. Geetha T, Varalakshmi P. Anticomplement activity of triterpenes from Crataeva nurvala stem bark in adjuvant arthritis in rats. Gen Pharmacol. 1999;32:495–497. [PubMed]
25. Bani S, Kaul A, Khan B, Ahmad SF, Suri KA, Gupta BD, et al. Suppression of T lymphocyte activity by lupeol isolated from Crataeva religiosa. Phytother Res. 2006;20:279–287. [PubMed]
26. Latha RM, Lenin M, Rasool M, Varalakshmi P. A novel derivative pentacyclic triterpene and omega 3 fatty acid. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2001;64:81–85. [PubMed]
27. Vasconcelos JF, Teixeira MM, Barbosa-Filho JM, Lúcio AS, Almeida JR, de Queiroz LP. The triterpenoid lupeol attenuates allergic airway inflammation in a murine model. Int Immunopharmacol. 2008;8:1216–1221. [PubMed]
28. Gutierrez-Lugo MT, Deschamps JD, Holman TR, Suarez E, Timmermann BN. Lipoxygenase inhibition by anadanthoflavone, a new flavonoid from the aerial parts of Anadenanthera colubrine. Planta Med. 2004;70:263–5. [PubMed]
29. Yamashita K, Lu H, Lu J, Chen G, Yokoyama T, Sagara Y, et al. Effect of three triterpenoids, lupeol, betulin, and betulinic acid on the stimulus-induced superoxide generation and tyrosyl phosphorylation of proteins in human neutrophils. Clin Chim Acta. 2002;325:91–6. [PubMed]
30. Harish BG, Krishna V, Santosh Kumar HS, Khadeer Ahamed BM, Sharath R, Kumara Swamy HM. Wound healing activity and docking of glycogen-synthase-kinase-3-beta-protein with isolated triterpenoid lupeol in rats. Phytomedicine. 2008;15:763–7. [PubMed]
31. Setzer WN, Setzer MC. Plant-derived triterpenoids as potential antineoplastic agents. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2003;3:540–56. [PubMed]
32. Bradford PG, Awad AB. Phytosterols as anticancer compounds. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007;51:161–70. [PubMed]
33. Waterman E, Lockwood B. Active components and clinical applications of olive oil. Altern Med Rev. 2007;12:331–42. [PubMed]
34. Min BS, Gao JJ, Nakamura N, Hattori M. Triterpenes from the spores of Ganoderma lucidum and their cytotoxicity against meth-A and LLC tumor cells. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 2001;48:1026–1033. [PubMed]
35. Nagumo A, Takanashi K, Hojo H, Suzuki Y. Cytotoxicity of Betulinic acidcteriohopane-32-ol against mouse leukemia L1210 and P388 cells in vitro. Toxicol Lett. 2001;58:309–313. [PubMed]
36. Najid A, Simon A, Cook J, Chable-Rabinovitch H, Delage C, Chulia AJ, Rigaud M. Characterization of ursolic acid as a lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase inhibitor using macrophages, platelets and differentiated HL60 leukemic cells. FEBS Lett. 1992;299:213–217. [PubMed]
37. Novotny L, Vachalkova A, Biggs D. Ursolic acid: an antitumorigenic and chemopreventive activity. Neoplasma. 2001;48:241–246. [PubMed]
38. Olukoga A, Donaldson D. Liquorice and its health implications. J R Soc Health. 2000;120:83–89. [PubMed]
39. Pato ka J. Anti-inflammatory triterpenoids from mysterious mushroom Ganoderma lucidum and their potential possibility in modern medicine. Acta Medica. 1999;42:123–125. [PubMed]
40. Lanzotti V. The analysis of onion and garlic. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1112:3–22. [PubMed]
41. Bauvois B, Dauzonne D. Aminopeptidase-N/CD13 (EC inhibitors: Chemistry, biological evaluations, and therapeutic prospects. Med Res Rev. 2006;26:88–130. [PubMed]
42. Molnár J, Gyémánt N, Tanaka M, Hohmann J, Bergmann-Leitner E, Molnar P, et al. Inhibition of multidrug resistance of cancer cells by natural diterpenes, triterpenes and carotenoids. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12:287–311. [PubMed]
43. Cuendet M, Pezzuto JM. Antitumor activity of bruceantin: an old drug with new promise. J Nat Prod. 2004;67:269–272. [PubMed]
44. Sporn MB, Suh N. Chemoprevention of cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:525–530. [PubMed]
45. Devereux TR, Risinger JI, Barrett JC. Mutations and altered expression of the human cancer genes: what they tell us about causes. IARC Sci Publ. 1999:19–42. [PubMed]
46. Coleman WB, Tsongalis GJ. The role of genomic instability in human carcinogenesis. Anticancer Res. 1999;19:4645–4664. [PubMed]
47. DePinho RA. The age of cancer. Nature. 2000;408:248–254. [PubMed]
48. Ponder BA. Cancer genetics. Nature. 2001;411:336–341. [PubMed]
49. Lira M, de W, dos Santos FV, Sannomiya M, Rodrigues CM, Vilegas W, Varanda EA. Modulatory effect of Byrsonima basiloba extracts on the mutagenicity of certain direct and indirect-acting mutagens in Salmonella typhimurium assays. J Med Food. 2008;11:111–119. [PubMed]
50. Nigam N, Prasad S, Shukla Y. Preventive effects of lupeol on DMBA induced DNA alkylation damage in mouse skin. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007;45:2331–2335. [PubMed]
51. Sultana S, Saleem M, Sharma S, Khan N. Lupeol, a triterpene, prevents free radical mediated macromolecular damage and alleviates benzoyl peroxide induced biochemical alterations in murine skin. Indian J Exp Biol. 2003;41:827–831. [PubMed]
52. Prasad S, Kumar Yadav V, Srivastava S, Shukla Y. Protective effects of lupeol against benzo[a]pyrene induced clastogenicity in mouse bone marrow cells. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008;52:1117–1120. [PubMed]
53. Saleem M, Afaq F, Adhami VM, Mukhtar H. Lupeol modulates NF-kappa B and PI3K/Akt pathways and inhibits skin cancer in CD-1 mice. Oncogene. 2004;23:5203–5214. [PubMed]
54. Luo JL, Kamata H, Karin M. IKK/NF-kappaB signaling: balancing life and death--a new approach to cancer therapy. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2625–2632. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Georgakis GV, Younes A. From Rapa Nui to rapamycin: targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR for cancer therapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2006;6:131–140. [PubMed]
56. Basuroy UK, Gerner EW. Emerging concepts in targeting the polyamine metabolic pathway in epithelial cancer chemoprevention and chemotherapy. J Biochem. 2006;139:27–33. [PubMed]
57. Saleem M, Maddodi N, Abu Zaid M, Khan N, bin Hafeez B, Asim M, Suh Y, Yun JM, Setaluri V, Mukhtar H. Lupeol inhibits growth of highly aggressive human metastatic melanoma cells in vitro and in vivo by inducing apoptosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2119–2127. [PubMed]
58. Hata K, Hori K, Murata J, Takahashi S. Remodeling of actin cytoskeleton in lupeol-induced B16 2F2 cell differentiation. J Biochem. 2005;138:467–472. [PubMed]
59. Aratanechemuge Y, Hibasami H, Sanpin K, Katsuzaki H, Imai K, Komiya T. Induction of apoptosis by Lupeol isolated from mokumen (Gossampinus malabarica L.Merr) in human promyelotic leukemia HL-60 cells. Oncol Rep. 2004;11:289–292. [PubMed]
60. Cmoch P, Pakulski Z, Swaczynová J, Strnad M. Synthesis of lupane-type saponins bearing mannosyl and 3,6-branched trimannosyl residues and their evaluation as anticancer agents. Carbohydr Res. 2008;343:995–1003. [PubMed]
61. Lambertini E, Lampronti I, Penolazzi L, Khan MT, Ather A, Giorgi G, et al. Expression of estrogen receptor alpha gene in breast cancer cells treated with transcription factor decoy is modulated by Bangladeshi natural plant extracts. Oncol Res. 2005;15:69–79. [PubMed]
62. Ma J, Waxman DJ. Combination of antiangiogenesis with chemotherapy for more effective cancer treatment. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:3670–3684. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. You YJ, Nam NH, Kim Y, Bae KH, Ahn BZ. Antiangiogenic activity of lupeol from Bombax ceiba. Phytother Res. 2003;17:341–344. [PubMed]
64. Murtaza I, Saleem M, Adhami VM, Hafeez BB, Mukhtar H. Suppression of cFLIP by lupeol, a dietary triterpene, is sufficient to overcome resistance to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in chemoresistant human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1156–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Saleem M, Kaur S, Kweon MH, Adhami VM, Afaq F, Mukhtar H. Lupeol, a fruit and vegetable based triterpene, induces apoptotic death of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells via inhibition of Ras signaling pathway. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1956–1964. [PubMed]
66. Ahn KS, Sethi G, Aggarwal BB. Reversal of chemoresistance and enhancement of apoptosis by statins through down-regulation of the NF-kappaB pathway. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75:907–913. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Lee TK, Poon RT, Wo JY, Ma S, Guan XY, Myers JN, et al. Lupeol suppresses cisplatin-induced nuclear factor-kappaB activation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and inhibits local invasion and nodal metastasis in an orthotopic nude mouse model. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8800–8809. [PubMed]
68. Saleem M, Kweon MH, Yun JM, Adhami VM, Khan N, Syed DN, et al. A novel dietary triterpene Lupeol induces fas-mediated apoptotic death of androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells and inhibits tumor growth in a xenograft model. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11203–11213. [PubMed]
69. Saleem M, Murtaza I, Tarapore R, Suh Y, Adhami VM, Johnson JJ, et al. Lupeol Inhibits Proliferation of Human Prostate Cancer Cells by Targeting {beta}-catenin Signaling. Carcinogenesis. 2009 Online published ahead. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Prasad S, Kalra N, Singh M, Shukla Y. Protective effects of lupeol and mango extract against androgen induced oxidative stress in Swiss albino mice. Asian J Androl. 2008;10:313–318. [PubMed]
71. Prasad S, Nigam N, Kalra N, Shukla Y. Regulation of signaling pathways involved in lupeol induced inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. 2008;47:916–924. [PubMed]
72. Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Yang X, Lv Z. Lupeol, a dietary triterpene, inhibited growth, and induced apoptosis through down-regulation of DR3 in SMMC7721 cells. Cancer Invest. 2009;27:163–170. [PubMed]
73. Vidya L, Lenin M, Varalakshmi P. Evaluation of the effect of triterpenes on urinary risk factors of stone formation in pyridoxine deficient hyperoxaluric rats. Phytother Res. 2002;16:514–518. [PubMed]
74. Sudharsan PT, Mythili Y, Selvakumar E, Varalakshmi P. Lupeol and its ester exhibit protective role against cyclophosphamide-induced cardiac mitochondrial toxicity. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2006;47:205–210. [PubMed]
75. Sudhahar V, Kumar SA, Sudharsan PT, Varalakshmi P. Protective effect of Lupeol and its ester on cardiac abnormalities in experimental hypercholesterolemia. Vascul Pharmacol. 2007;46:412–418. [PubMed]
76. Pato ka J. Biologically active pentacyclic triterpenes and their current medicine signification. J App Biomed. 2003;1:7 – 12.
77. Al-Rehaily A, El-Tahir KEH, Mossa JS, Rafatullah S. Pharamacological studies of various extracts and the major constituent Lupeol obtained from hexane extract of Teclea nobilis in rodents. Nat Product Sci. 2001;7:76–82.
78. Preetha SP, Kanniappan M, Selvakumar E, Nagaraj M, Varalakshmi P. Lupeol ameliorates aflatoxin B1-induced peroxidative hepatic damage in rats. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006;143:333–339. [PubMed]