PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Acad Radiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2763975
NIHMSID: NIHMS123787

Proton and Phosphorous MR Spectroscopy in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck

Abstract

Rationale and objectives

Phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P MRS) has been used to evaluate and predict treatment response in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNSCC). Several studies have also shown the potential of proton MR spectroscopy (1H MRS) in assessing response in HNSCC. In view of the inherent limitations associated with performing 31P MRS in clinical settings, the current study was performed to explore as to whether 1H MRS could provide similar or complimentary metabolic information in HNSCC.

Materials and Methods

Fifteen patients with HNSCC underwent pretreatment MR imaging. Both 1H MRS and 31P MRS were performed on viable and solid parts of the metastatic lymph nodes of these patients. Peak areas of total choline (tCho) and unsuppressed water, as observed on 1H MRS and phosphomonoester (PME) and β-nucleotide triphosphates (β-NTPs) from 31P MRS were computed. The Pearson correlation coefficient value was used to correlate tCho/water and PME/β-NTP ratios.

Results

In all the patients, the metastatic nodes appeared hyperintense on T2 weighted images and hypointense on T1 weighted images with variable signal intensity. A prominent resonance of tCho on 1H MRS and a resonance of PME on 31P MRS from metastatic nodes of all patients were observed. A moderate correlation coefficient of 0.31 was observed between tCho/water and PME/β-NTP (p>0.05).

Conclusion

The biochemical pathways involved in 1H MRS of tCho may be different from the phospholipids metabolites seen by 31P MRS of head and neck cancers and thus the two MRS techniques may be complimentary to each other.

Keywords: Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck, phosphorous MR spectroscopy, proton MR spectroscopy, phosphomonoester, choline

Introduction

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) is a malignant tumor arising most frequently in the non-keratinized epithelial tissue of the upper aero digestive tract. This disease accounts for about 5% of all cancers and about 90% of all malignant tumors of the head and neck region (1). These tumors are characterized by a multiphasic and multifactorial etiopathogenesis (2). Despite recent progress in diagnosis and advances in local and systemic therapeutic approaches, HNSCC remains a clinically challenging disease (3). It is expected that development in treatment modalities along with consistent, reliable and reproducible prognostic biomarkers that monitor and predict therapeutic response, may improve the clinical outcome of patients with HNSCC.

Phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P MRS) provides a window for assessing tissue bioenergetics and metabolism of membrane phospholipids (4). Specifically, the 31P MRS spectrum demonstrates signals from phosphomonoesters (PME, phospholipid precursors) and phosphodiesters (PDE, phospholipid catabolites), inorganic phosphate (Pi), phosphocreatine (PCr), and nucleotide triphosphates (NTPs) related to energy metabolism. Using 31P MRS, it has been reported that head and neck tumors exhibit elevated PME/β-NTP ratios (5, 6) and this ratio has been used as a response indicator for chemo and/or radiation therapy in head and neck tumors (7).

While 31P MRS studies have reported alterations in phospholipid metabolism, energetics and pH in tumors, the low sensitivity of this technique limits its application to relatively large and mostly superficial tumors in the clinical settings (8, 9). On the other hand, proton MR spectroscopy (1H MRS) has a 15-fold higher sensitivity over 31P MRS (10) and can detect much smaller tumors with better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than 31P MRS (11). 1H MRS provides information about cellular metabolism that enables understanding of the underlying biological and pathophysiological events associated with tumors (12). A resonance of choline containing compounds (tCho) as observed on 1H MRS includes signals from free choline, phosphocholine (PC) and glycerol 3-phosphocholine (GPC). The tCho signal is thought to be a marker for increased membrane turnover or cell proliferation (4, 13). Several promising in vivo and in vitro 1H MRS studies have reported elevation of the total choline (tCho)/creatine (Cr) ratio as a consistent finding for head and neck tumors including metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) lymph nodes (1416), and SCC cell cultures (17). Previous reports also indicated that 1H MRS can differentiate between normal and malignant tissues (14, 16, 1820). More recently, a 1H MRS study reported assessment of response to treatment in HNSCC with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 82% (21).

With the inherent problem of relatively low sensitivity and the necessity of additional hardware in performing 31P MRS in mind, it is highly desirable to assess as to whether similar or complementary information from 1H MRS can be obtained that may obviate the need to perform 31P MRS in future. Thus, the present study was performed to ascertain if tCho, levels as observed on 1H MRS, have any correlation with PME levels as observed on 31P MRS.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Fifteen patients (all males, range=31–76 years), who were newly diagnosed with HNSCC were included in this study. All patients were assessed by a neuroradiologist and a radiation oncologist for the presence of metastatic cervical lymph nodes, based on clinical reports and a physical exam. All patients underwent MR examination prior to surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy.

Data Acquisition

MR Imaging

Diagnostic MR imaging, 1H MRS and 31P MRS were performed on a 1.5 T Siemens Sonata scanner (n=7) or on a 3T Siemens Trio scanner (n=8) (Siemens Medical Systems, Iselin, NJ). A neck array coil or a neurovascular coil was used on 1.5 T or 3 T MR system respectively. The diagnostic imaging protocol on both MR systems included three-plane scout localizer, axial T2 weighted images [Repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE)=4000/131ms], field of view (FOV)=260×260mm2, matrix size=384×512, slice thickness=5 mm, flip angle (FA)=120°, bandwidth (BW)=130Hz, number of excitations (NEX)=1; axial T1 weighted images (TR/TE= 600/10ms), field of view (FOV)=260×260 mm2, matrix size=384×512, slice thickness=5 mm, FA=90°, BW=130 Hz, NEX=1.

1H MRS

Single-voxel 1H MRS was performed using a spin echo (point resolved spectroscopy) sequence with water suppression by means of a chemical shift selective saturation (CHESS) sequence. Sequence parameters included: TR/TE=1500/135 ms, BW=1200 Hz, NEX=256. The 1H MRS voxel was placed in the center of the metastatic node, based on T2 weighted images. Six outer volume saturation slabs (20 mm thick) were placed outside the voxel to suppress lipid signals from the surrounding normal tissue. Acquisition time (TA) for the 1H MRS sequence was 6:30 minutes. In order to account for the differences in the voxel size between patients, the data were normalized to the water signal from the voxel, which was acquired by an additional spectrum from the same voxel without water suppression using NEX=8.

31 P MRS

A single slice or a multi slice two-dimensional (2D) 31P chemical shift imaging sequence with proton decoupling and nuclear Over Hauser enhancement (NOE) was used to acquire the 31P MRS data using a custom-built 7-cm (outer diameter) transmitter/receiver dual tuned 1H/31P surface coil. Sequence parameters for the single slice 2D sequence included: TR/TE=1000/2.3 ms, NEX=64, BW=4000 Hz, TA=9:24 minutes. The sequence parameters for the multi slice 2D sequence were: TR/TE= 1000/0.04 ms, NEX=12, BW=4000 Hz and TA=13:54 minutes. The typical voxel size varied from 1.33 mm3 to 15.62 mm3. The decoupling pulse parameters included: pulse type=Waltz-16, pulse duration=1.0 ms, pulse angle =180°. The NOE parameters included a single rectangular pulse for 5 ms with a pulse angle of 90°. The data set was acquired using elliptical k-space sampling with weighted phase encoding to reduce the acquisition time. To minimize the effect of increased nominal voxel size by elliptical k-space sampling, a Hamming filter (50%) was applied in the spatial dimensions.

Data Analysis

The acquired 1H MRS signal (free induction decay) was zero-filled (1024 data points), smoothed (Hanning filter, width 200 ms) and Fourier-transformed, followed by phase (zero and first order polynomial) and baseline correction for optimal linear frequency dependence. The 1H MRS data were analyzed by taking the peak area ratio of the tCho at 3.2 ppm and unsuppressed water resonance at 4.77 ppm using a Leonardo workstation operating the Syngo software (Siemens, Germany). Peak areas were determined using pre-defined model fits for tCho and water resonances. The fitting of individual metabolite peaks was optimized by adjusting the chemical shift, amplitude and line-width interactively. The quality of spectral fitting was estimated by the difference spectrum (fitted spectrum subtracted from original spectrum). The peak areas for tCho and water were computed and the tCho/water ratio was calculated from all the patients.

It has been suggested that using internal water as a reference causes an inherent source of error (22) since the signal intensity of the unsuppressed water signal may be modulated by variations in spin-lattice (T1) and spin-spin relaxation times (T2). Therefore, in addition to the tCho/water ratio, compensation of T1 and T2 relaxation effects was carried out by calculating the proton density (ρ) value from the metastatic node from each patient using the following equation.

SI=ρ[1exp(TR/T1)][exp(TE/T2)]
Eq. (1)

where SI=signal intensity of the unsuppressed water signal; ρ=proton density; T1=spin- lattice relaxation time; T2=spin-spin relaxation time measured from each patient. At TR=1500 ms and TE=135 ms, the value of ρ was determined from Eq. (1) using the T1 and T2 values from each metastatic node. Quantitative T2 and T1 measurements in each case were performed by acquiring a series of T2-weighted images [four different TEs; 13, 53, 80 and 120 ms (TR=2000 ms)] and T1-weighted images [five different inversion times (TIs); 60, 200, 400, 800, 1600 ms (TR/TE=1880/4.38 ms)] respectively. The tCho/ρ ratio were computed from all patients.

The acquired 31P MRS signal (free induction decay) was zero-filled (1024 data points), smoothed (Hanning filter, width 100 ms) and Fourier-transformed, followed by phase (zero and first order polynomial) and baseline correction for optimal linear frequency dependence. The 31P MRS data were analyzed by first selecting a representative voxel encompassing the tumor from the multi-slice data set using the Syngo software. Peak areas were determined using pre-defined model fits for PME and β-NTP resonances. The peak areas for resonances at 6.5 ppm due to PME and at −16.0 ppm from β-NTP were computed and the PME/β-NTP ratio was calculated from all patients.

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS program (version 15.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Pearson correlation coefficient values were calculated to correlate both tCho/water and PME/β-NTP and tCho/ρ and PME/β-NTP values.

Results

The metastatic nodes appeared hyperintense on T2 weighted images and hypointense on T1 weighted images with variable signal intensity. Of the 15 patients studied, four had partially or completely cystic metastatic nodes (based on signal intensity on T2 and T1 weighted images). Cystic/necrotic tumors typically exhibit significantly reduced or absent tCho probably due to the absence of active membrane turnover in fluids (23, 24). Therefore, data from these patients were excluded from the analysis. On 1H MRS, the spectrum from a typical metastatic node exhibited elevated resonance from tCho and in some cases, an inverted resonance of lactate (Fig. 1). However, lactate signal was not consistently observed in all patients. The resonance from tCho was observed from all 11 patients, and a resonance from Cr was observed in 7/11 cases. A typical 31P MRS spectrum from a metastatic node demonstrating resonances from PME, PDE, Pi, PCr and γ-, α- and β-NTPs is shown in Figure 2.

Fig. 1
Representative image and spectrum from a patient with HNSCC. (a) An axial T2-weighted image from the neck region demonstrating a hyperintense metastatic lymph node. The white box overlaid on the T2-weighted image shows the voxel selected for spectroscopy ...
Fig. 2
Representative 31P spectrum from the same patient shown in Fig. 1. T2 weighted MR image demonstrating an overlaid grid obtained from 3D 31P chemical shift imaging acquired with proton decoupling and nuclear Overhauser enhancement pulses using a 1H/31 ...

The mean tCho/water and PME/β-NTP ratios from solid viable tumor nodes were 8.32 ± 3.51 and 0.69 ± 0.31 respectively. A scatter plot of tCho/water and PME/β-NTP illustrates a modest positive relationship between these two ratios (Fig. 3). The Pearson correlation coefficient between tCho/water and PME/β-NTP was 0.31 (P>0.05). After compensating for T1 and T2 effects, the correlation coefficient between tCho/ρ and PME/β-NTP was 0.29 (P>0.05).

Fig. 3
A scatter plot between tCho/water and PME/β-NTP demonstrating a moderate positive correlation (r=0.31, P>0.05).

Discussion

Head and neck tumors exhibit distinctive spectral characteristics compared to normal tissues including elevated PME/β-NTP and PDE/β-NTP ratios on 31P MRS (2527). Elevated PME and PDE levels have also been reported in a variety of in vitro cultured tumor cells (28). The PME resonance comprises of phosphoethanolamine (PE) and phosphocholine (PC) components. The importance of PME resonances can be judged by the fact that they have been implicated in predicting tumor malignancy (5, 6), monitoring treatment response (8, 27) and prediction of treatment response based on pre-treatment values (7). Another prominent resonance visible on 31P MRS is the PDE that is comprised of glycerol 3-phosphocholine (GPC) and glycerol 3-phosphoethanolamine (GPE) with a dominant contribution from GPC (9). A few studies (5, 6, 25) have investigated the variations in PDE levels (indicators for membrane catabolism) in head and neck tumors. These studies reported significantly higher PDE/β-NTP in tumors compared to normal tissues. However, the clinical applicability of PDE resonance as a possible biomarker for response to therapy has been limited in human tumors probably because some studies report an increase while other report a decrease in PDE after treatment (5, 25).

Despite these promising studies, widespread clinical application of 31P MRS for studying tumors has been challenging. The reason for its limited use is the need for additional hardware and the inherently lower sensitivity (7%) of 31P nucleus in comparison to the 1H nucleus. The lower sensitivity translates into long acquisition times and the need to study large tumors. A potential means to enhance the sensitivity is the use of proton-decoupling (29) and NOE pulses (30) that leads to a threefold increase in the signal intensity of coupled resonances. However, these additional radiofrequency pulses increase the specific absorption rate (SAR), which may limit their use in some human studies. Therefore, it is more appealing and convenient to make use of metabolite information as observed on 1H MRS for diagnosis, staging and predicting treatment response in HNSCC.

Several in vivo and in vitro 1H MRS studies of head and neck tumors have indicated the role of tCho/Cr ratio in distinguishing HNSCC from surrounding tissue (14, 20, 31, 32) and differentiating residual or recurrent malignancies from post radiation changes (15). In one in vivo study, tissue hypoxia and pO2 levels were correlated with tumor lactate indicating the use of 1H MRS in monitoring oxygenation of HNSCC tumors (18). An in vitro study indicated the potential of tCho/Cr ratio in predicting treatment response in head and neck tumors (21, 33). Huang et al. (33) also reported a correlation between tCho levels in vivo and response to treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiation). These investigators reported that patients, who did not have any evidence of malignancy, demonstrated lower tCho/water ratios.

On 1H MRS, the combined tCho resonance is mainly composed of components with N-trimethyl protons such as free Cho, PC and GPC. Due to the small chemical shift difference between methyl protons of PC and GPC, it is difficult to resolve these signals using in vivo 1H MRS (34). However, using in vitro high-resolution 1H MRS, Barker et al. (35) observed three-fold higher concentrations of GPC over PC with only a small contribution of free Cho from normal canine brain specimens. These observations were in good agreement with an in vivo proton decoupled 31P MRS study on normal human subjects (36). In brain tumors, increased membrane turnover leads to elevations in the tCho resonance predominantly due to increases in the levels of PC as has been observed by Usenius et al. (37) in high-grade astrocytomas using high resolution in vitro 1H MRS. Similar trends in PC and GPC concentrations during the S-phase of rat mammary tumor cells were reported (38). Using cultured human mammary epithelial cells, Aboagye et al. (39) demonstrated that progression from normal to malignant phenotype is associated with altered membrane choline phospholipid metabolism. Investigators of this study observed a “GPC to PC switch” in breast tumor cell lines and increased levels of PC relative to GPC with progression from normal to immortalized, to oncogene-transformed, and to tumor-derived cells. It has been hypothesized that growth factor-mediated activation of the tyrosine kinase cascade involving receptor-grb 2-sos-ras-raf-1-MEKMAPK leads to an increase in PC levels (40). These studies indicate a dominance of the PC resonance contributing to the tCho resonance in tumors.

The increase in PME pool in tumors and cultured tumor cells reflect increased membrane turnover (41) and cell nutritional status (42) in the same way that elevated tCho levels are seen in various malignancies on 1H MRS (43) and thus intuitively, the same information can be obtained by 31P or 1H MRS. The PME resonances in in vivo 31P MRS are often not sufficiently resolved to separate the contributions from PC and PE. However, a number of studies have indicated that PE is the dominant metabolite contributing to this resonance. High performance liquid chromatography and in vitro 1H MRS of human brain tumor specimens have revealed significantly increased PE concentrations in malignant tumors compared to biopsied or autopsied normal brain specimens (44, 45). In a study, four to five fold increases in the concentration of PE were observed in pituitary adenoma, malignant lymphoma and medulloblastoma specimens compared to normal brain specimens (44). Increases in PE levels were also reported in the same study from high-grade astrocytoma specimens (44). Moreover, it has been also been reported that the degree of increase in PE is much greater than PC in breast carcinomas (46), lymphomas (9), neuroblastomas (47), medulloblastomas and high-grade astrocytoma, but not in metastatic hepatocellular carcinomas (48). In a murine lymphoma model infiltrating the liver, Dixon et al. (49) observed 10 times higher concentration of PE compared to PC. Using in vitro high-resolution 31P MRS, a higher concentration of PE, compared to PC, was also observed in cultured SCC cell extracts (17). Although the mechanism and significance for elevated concentration of PE in tumors are not fully understood, it is likely related to the activation of phosphatidylethanolamine metabolism that plays a key role in the modification of the tumor cell membrane (50). A high concentration of PE has also been observed with stimulation of phospholipase C or D in a variety of cancer cell lines (51, 52). The enzymes phospholipase C or D trigger the breakdown of phosphatidylethanolamine to PE and diacylglycerol, and PE acts as a long-term second-messenger system for cellular proliferation and cell growth (53).

In spite of the similar steps involved in the biosynthesis of PE and PC, different regulatory mechanisms by a complex enzyme system and transport mechanism may result in different PE and PC concentrations in tumors. Of importance to this study; the phospholipid metabolites contributing to the increases in tCho in 1H MR spectra (PC and to a lesser extent GPC), are not exactly the same metabolites contributing to the increase in PMEs in 31P MR spectra (PE and PC). Thus the moderate correlation between tCho and PME levels observed in our study is probably due to the fact that the dominant PC signal in the tCho resonance (observed on 1H MRS) is only a secondary component of the PME signal observed on 31P MRS. We should also note that differences in metabolite levels may arise from differences in voxel dimensions and co-ordinates chosen for 1H MRS and 31P MRS studies. While this was true, the results obtained here were from similar tumor areas as the voxels were selected from the viable regions of the tumor and the sizes were selected such to encompass the maximum tissue volume for optimal SNR. Future studies with improved acquisition and processing strategies and with higher numbers of patients may further establish the relationship between 31P MRS and 1H MRS visible phospholipids.

Acknowledgments

The support of a research coordinator Alex Kilger and technologists Doris Cain, Tonya Kurtz and Patricia O’ Donnell is gratefully acknowledged.

This work was funded by NIH Grant RO1-CA102756.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Funk GF, Karnell LH, Robinson RA, Zhen WK, Trask DK, Hoffman HT. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of oral cavity cancer: a National Cancer Data Base report. Head Neck. 2002;24:165–180. [PubMed]
2. Scully C, Field JK, Tanzawa H. Genetic aberrations in oral or head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCCHN): 1. Carcinogen metabolism, DNA repair and cell cycle control. Oral Oncol. 2000;36:256–263. [PubMed]
3. Zorat PL, Paccagnella A, Cavaniglia G, et al. Randomized phase III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: 10-year follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1714–1717. [PubMed]
4. Podo F. Tumour phospholipid metabolism. NMR Biomed. 1999;12:413–439. [PubMed]
5. McKenna WG, Lenkinski RE, Hendrix RA, Vogele KE, Bloch P. The use of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the assessment of patients with head and neck and other superficial human malignancies. Cancer. 1989;64:2069–2075. [PubMed]
6. Maldonado X, Alonso J, Giralt J, et al. 31Phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the assessment of head and neck tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;40:309–312. [PubMed]
7. Shukla-Dave A, Poptani H, Loevner LA, et al. Prediction of treatment response of head and neck cancers with P-31 MR spectroscopy from pretreatment relative phosphomonoester levels. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:688–694. [PubMed]
8. Arias-Mendoza F, Smith MR, Brown TR. Predicting treatment response in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma from the pretreatment tumor content of phosphoethanolamine plus phosphocholine. Acad Radiol. 2004;11:368–376. [PubMed]
9. Arias-Mendoza F, Zakian K, Schwartz A, et al. Methodological standardization for a multi-institutional in vivo trial of localized 31P MR spectroscopy in human cancer research. In vitro and normal volunteer studies. NMR Biomed. 2004;17:382–391. [PubMed]
10. Gadian DG, Isaacs EB, Cross JH, et al. Lateralization of brain function in childhood revealed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neurology. 1996;46:974–977. [PubMed]
11. Bourne RM, Stanwell P, Stretch JR, et al. In vivo and ex vivo proton MR spectroscopy of primary and secondary melanoma. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53:506–513. [PubMed]
12. Hollingworth W, Medina LS, Lenkinski RE, et al. A systematic literature review of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the characterization of brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1404–1411. [PubMed]
13. Miller BL. A review of chemical issues in 1H NMR spectroscopy: N-acetyl-L-aspartate, creatine and choline. NMR Biomed. 1991;4:47–52. [PubMed]
14. Mukherji SK, Schiro S, Castillo M, Kwock L, Muller KE, Blackstock W. Proton MR spectroscopy of squamous cell carcinoma of the extracranial head and neck: in vitro and in vivo studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:1057–1072. [PubMed]
15. Mukherji SK, Gerstle RJ. In vitro 1H MR spectroscopy of squamous cell carcinoma of the extracranial head and neck. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1998;8:835–847. [PubMed]
16. Bisdas S, Baghi M, Huebner F, et al. In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of primary tumours, nodal and recurrent disease of the extracranial head and neck. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:251–257. [PubMed]
17. Kuesel AC, Graschew G, Hull WE, Lorenz W, Thielmann HW. 31P NMR studies of cultured human tumor cells. Influence of pH on phospholipid metabolite levels and the detection of cytidine 5′-diphosphate choline. NMR Biomed. 1990;3:78–89. [PubMed]
18. Star-Lack JM, Adalsteinsson E, Adam MF, et al. In vivo 1H MR spectroscopy of human head and neck lymph node metastasis and comparison with oxygen tension measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:183–193. [PubMed]
19. Gerstle RJ, Aylward SR, Kromhout-Schiro S, Mukherji SK. The role of neural networks in improving the accuracy of MR spectroscopy for the diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1133–1138. [PubMed]
20. Maheshwari SR, Mukherji SK, Neelon B, et al. The choline/creatine ratio in five benign neoplasms: comparison with squamous cell carcinoma by use of in vitro MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1930–1935. [PubMed]
21. Bezabeh T, Odlum O, Nason R, et al. Prediction of treatment response in head and neck cancer by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2108–2113. [PubMed]
22. Christiansen P, Toft PB, Gideon P, Danielsen ER, Ring P, Henriksen O. MR-visible water content in human brain: a proton MRS study. Magn Reson Imaging. 1994;12:1237–1244. [PubMed]
23. Poptani H, Gupta RK, Roy R, Pandey R, Jain VK, Chhabra DK. Characterization of intracranial mass lesions with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:1593–1603. [PubMed]
24. Mishra AM, Gupta RK, Jaggi RS, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging and in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differential diagnosis of ring-enhancing intracranial cystic mass lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:540–547. [PubMed]
25. Vogl T, Peer F, Schedel H, et al. 31P-spectroscopy of head and neck tumors--surface coil technique. Magn Reson Imaging. 1989;7:425–435. [PubMed]
26. Hendrix RA, Lenkinski RE, Vogele K, Bloch P, McKenna WG. 31P localized magnetic resonance spectroscopy of head and neck tumors--preliminary findings. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;103:775–783. [PubMed]
27. Karczmar GS, Meyerhoff DJ, Boska MD, et al. P-31 spectroscopy study of response of superficial human tumors to therapy. Radiology. 1991;179:149–153. [PubMed]
28. Ruiz-Cabello J, Cohen JS. Phospholipid metabolites as indicators of cancer cell function. NMR Biomed. 1992;5:226–233. [PubMed]
29. Luyten PR, Bruntink G, Sloff FM, et al. Broadband proton decoupling in human 31P NMR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 1989;1:177–183. [PubMed]
30. Li CW, Negendank WG, Murphy-Boesch J, Padavic-Shaller K, Brown TR. Molar quantitation of hepatic metabolites in vivo in proton-decoupled, nuclear Over Hauser effect enhanced 31P NMR spectra localized by three-dimensional chemical shift imaging. NMR Biomed. 1996;9:141–155. [PubMed]
31. Mukherji SK, Schiro S, Castillo M, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy of squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: in vitro characteristics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17:1485–1490. [PubMed]
32. El-Sayed S, Bezabeh T, Odlum O, et al. An ex vivo study exploring the diagnostic potential of 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region. Head Neck. 2002;24:766–772. [PubMed]
33. Huang WRP, Shindo M. Evaluation of head and neck tumor response to therapy using in vivo 1H MR spectroscopy: correlation with pathology. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson. 2000;8:552.
34. McKnight TR. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic evaluation of brain tumor metabolism. Semin Oncol. 2004;31:605–617. [PubMed]
35. Barker PB, Breiter SN, Soher BJ, et al. Quantitative proton spectroscopy of canine brain: in vivo and in vitro correlations. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32:157–163. [PubMed]
36. Albers MJ, Krieger MD, Gonzalez-Gomez I, et al. Proton-decoupled 31P MRS in untreated pediatric brain tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:22–29. [PubMed]
37. Usenius JP, Vainio P, Hernesniemi J, Kauppinen RA. Choline-containing compounds in human astrocytomas studied by 1H NMR spectroscopy in vivo and in vitro. J Neurochem. 1994;63:1538–1543. [PubMed]
38. Smith TA, Glaholm J, Leach MO, Machin L, McCready VR. The effect of intra-tumour heterogeneity on the distribution of phosphorus-containing metabolites within human breast tumours: an in vitro study using 31P NMR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 1991;4:262–267. [PubMed]
39. Aboagye EO, Bhujwalla ZM. Malignant transformation alters membrane choline phospholipid metabolism of human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 1999;59:80–84. [PubMed]
40. Cai H, Erhardt P, Troppmair J, et al. Hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine couples Ras to activation of Raf protein kinase during mitogenic signal transduction. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:7645–7651. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Daly PF, Lyon RC, Faustino PJ, Cohen JS. Phospholipid metabolism in cancer cells monitored by 31P NMR spectroscopy. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:14875–14878. [PubMed]
42. Miceli MV, Kan LS, Newsome DA. Phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human retinoblastoma cells: correlation with metabolic indices. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988;970:262–269. [PubMed]
43. Bruhn H, Frahm J, Gyngell ML, et al. Noninvasive differentiation of tumors with use of localized H-1 MR spectroscopy in vivo: initial experience in patients with cerebral tumors. Radiology. 1989;172:541–548. [PubMed]
44. Kinoshita Y, Yokota A, Koga Y. Phosphorylethanolamine content of human brain tumors. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1994;34:803–806. [PubMed]
45. Clejan S. HPLC analytical methods for the separation of molecular species of fatty acids in diacylglycerol and cellular phospholipids. Methods Mol Biol. 1998;105:255–274. [PubMed]
46. Kalra R, Wade KE, Hands L, et al. Phosphomonoester is associated with proliferation in human breast cancer: a 31P MRS study. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:1145–1153. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Maris JM, Evans AE, McLaughlin AC, et al. 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic investigation of human neuroblastoma in situ. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1500–1505. [PubMed]
48. Kinoshita Y, Yokota A. Absolute concentrations of metabolites in human brain tumors using in vitro proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 1997;10:2–12. [PubMed]
49. Dixon RM, Tian M. Phospholipid synthesis in the lymphomatous mouse liver studied by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vitro and by administration of 14C-radiolabelled compounds in vivo. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;1181:111–121. [PubMed]
50. Cullis PR, de Kruijff B, Hope MJ, Nayar R, Schmid SL. Phospholipids and membrane transport. Can J Biochem. 1980;58:1091–1100. [PubMed]
51. Kiss Z, Crilly KS, Anderson WH. Carcinogens stimulate phosphorylation of ethanolamine derived from increased hydrolysis of phosphatidylethanolamine in C3H/101/2 fibroblasts. FEBS Lett. 1993;336:115–118. [PubMed]
52. Gillham H, Brindle KM. 31P NMR measurements of the effects of unsaturated fatty acids on cellular phospholipid metabolism. Magn Reson Med. 1996;35:481–488. [PubMed]
53. Smith TA, Glaholm J, Leach MO, et al. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro 31P NMR spectra from human breast tumours: variations in phospholipid metabolism. Br J Cancer. 1991;63:514–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed]