|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Both G- and V-type nerve agents possess a center of chirality about phosphorus. The Sp-enantiomers are generally more potent inhibitors than their Rp-counterparts toward acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE). To develop model compounds with defined centers of chirality that mimic the target nerve agent structures, we synthesized both the Sp and Rp stereoisomers of two series of G-type nerve agent model compounds in enantiomerically enriched form. The two series of model compounds contained identical substituents on the phosphorus as the G-type agents, except that thiomethyl (CH3-S-) and thiocholine ((CH3)3NCH2CH2-S-) groups were used to replace the traditional nerve agent leaving groups (i.e., fluoro for GB, GF, and GD; and cyano for GA). Inhibition kinetic studies of the thiomethyl- and thiocholine-substituted series of nerve agent model compounds revealed that the Sp enantiomers of both series of compounds showed greater inhibition potency toward AChE and BChE. The level of stereoselectivity, as indicated by the ratio of the bimolecular inhibition rate constants between Sp and Rp enantiomers, was greatest for the GF model compounds in both series. The thiocholine analogs were much more potent than the corresponding thiomethyl analogs. With the exception of the GA model compounds, both series showed greater potency against AChE than BChE. The stereoselectivity (i.e., Sp > Rp), enzyme selectivity, and dynamic range of inhibition potency contributed from these two series of compounds suggest that the combined application of these model compounds will provide useful research tools for understanding interactions of nerve agents with cholinesterase and other enzymes involved in nerve agent and organophosphate pharmacology. The potential of and limitations for using these model compounds in the development of biological therapeutics against nerve agent toxicity are also discussed.
Nerve agents are a subfamily of organophosphorus compounds (OPs) developed for chemical warfare. Their central nervous system toxicity is caused by irreversible inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (1). The inhibition of both AChE and the serum cholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), by OPs occurs through nucleophilic attack of the active site serine on the phosphorus atom. The active site serine residues for both AChE and BChE are located at the bottom of a deep gorge (2, 3). Phosphonate binding into this site is controlled by four factors: 1) the oxyanion hole, that interacts strongly with the phosphoryl oxygen; 2) the pi-cation binding site, that is designed to interact with the choline moiety of the normal substrate; 3) the acyl binding site, that is on the opposite side of the active site from the pi-cation binding site; and 4) the gorge. Due to the restricted availability of authentic nerve agents, OPs including chlorpyrifos-oxon, paraoxon, and echothiophate (ETP) have been commonly used by scientists as model compounds to evaluate cholinesterase-OP compound interactions. In contrast to nerve agents, however, chlorpyrifos-oxon, paraoxon, and ETP all have two ethoxy side chains attached to phosphorus, and thus the phosphorus atom does not possess a center of chirality. Most nerve agents, including both G- and V-type agents such as sarin (GB), soman (GD), cyclosarin (GF), S-[2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl]-O-ethyl methylphosphonothioate (VX), and Russian VX (VR), possess a center of chirality about phosphorus resulting in both Sp and Rp isomers. GD also has a chiral center at a carbon in the pinacolyl side chain. These nerve agents have shown significant stereoselective inhibition toward AChE and BChE. The Sp-enantiomers are significantly more potent inhibitors than their Rp-counterparts (4-8). Stereoselectivity for both AChE and BChE is determined by different steric interference encountered by the different enantiomers.
Enzyme-mediated detoxification of OPs has been a challenging goal for many years (for review see (9, 10)). The objective is to identify enzymes or enzyme variants that can act as bioscavengers by converting the toxic OP compounds to non-toxic materials. Catalytic efficiency and substrate specificity are two defining parameters required for these bioscavengers. For AChE and BChE, because the wild type enzymes were irreversibly inhibited by OPs, efforts were focused on evolving spontaneous catalytic efficiency (11, 12), or enhancing oxime-mediated enzyme reactivation (13, 14). For other candidate detoxification enzymes with intrinsic OP compound hydrolysis activity, the approach was to ensure that the substrate specificities for nerve agents are comparable to the primary physiological target, AChE. Bacterial phosphotriesterase (5, 15) and mammalian paraoxonase (16, 17) were found to hydrolyze the Rp isomers GF and GD more efficiently than their respective Sp isomers. Therefore, it is essential to consider stereoselectivity as a key parameter during any detoxification bioscavenger development program. Such an effort includes maintaining correct stereoselectivity for variants of AChE and/or BChE, and elaboration of the correct substrate stereoselectivity for variants of detoxification catalysts such as phosphotriesterase and paraoxonase (5, 15, 16). Nerve agent model compounds with defined centers of chirality that mimic the most potent nerve agent structures are therefore essential tools for developing new detoxification catalysts.
Methylphosphonothioates are a class of nerve agent model compounds that have been synthesized in enantiomeric form and used to address cholinesterase stereoselectivity questions. A collection of methylphosphonothioates were initially synthesized by the Berman group to study Torpedo AChE inhibition (18). Later, related compounds were used to study inhibition of mouse AChE/BChE, and reactivation of their phosphonylated conjugates (13, 19, 20). We synthesized two series of G-type nerve agent model compounds in enantiomerically enriched form. The compounds contained the same substituents on the phosphorus as the authentic G-type agents, but used thiomethyl (CH3-S-) or thiocholine ((CH3)3NCH2CH2-S-) groups in place of the normal nerve agent leaving groups (i.e., fluoro for GB, GD, and GF; and cyano for GA). In this study, we examined the inhibition kinetics of these nerve agent model compounds with both human AChE and human BChE. The synthetic compounds showed the anticipated stereoselective inhibition of human AChE and BChE as measured by bimolecular rate constants (i.e., Sp > Rp) and will be useful tools for evaluating candidate bioscavenger enzyme variants for nerve agent inhibition stereoselectivity.
The nerve agent model compounds synthesized for this study are toxic and should be handled with extreme care. In addition, the thiomethyl analogs are volatile and should be handled in a well-ventilated area. All wastes containing the analogs were hydrolyzed by overnight incubation with 2.5 M NaOH and 10% ethanol before disposal.
Methylphosphonothioic dichloride was obtained from Digital Specialty Chemicals, Ltd. (Toronto, Canada). Recombinant human AChE, β-lactoglobulin from bovine milk, acetylthiocholine iodide (ATCh), butyrylthiocholine iodide (BTCh), and 5,5’-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO). Buffers and solvents were purchased from VWR Scientific, Inc. (San Diego, CA) in the highest purity commercially available. Highly purified human BChE and ETP were generously provided by Dr. Lockridge (University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE).
The synthetic route followed the procedures described previously (18, 21, 22) and illustrated briefly in Scheme 1 and and2.2. For chemical synthesis verification, 1H- and 31P-NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature at 500 MHz or 300 MHz and 200 MHz or 75 MHz, respectively, on a Varian Unity 500 or Varian Mercury 300 spectrometer (Varian, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA). Chemical shifts were reported in ppm relative to the residual solvent peak on the δ scale (CDCl3, 1H: δ = 7.26 and CD3OD, 1H: δ = 3.31). Abbreviations for multiplicity include: br = broad, s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, and m = multiplet. Coupling constants (J) were reported in Hertz (Hz). Optical rotations were measured on a Jasco P-1010 polarimeter (Jasco, Easton, MD). The specific rotation for a molecule was given by the equation , where the concentration (c) was given in g mL−1 and the tube length (l) was 1 dm. Low resolution mass spectra were obtained on a Hitachi M-8000 mass spectrometer (Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan) using either positive or negative mode electrospray ionization. Preparative (PTLC) and analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) were done using 1 and 0.25 mm silica gel 60 (F254 Merck) plates, respectively, and visualized at 254 nm. Alternatively or in tandem, analytical TLC plates were visualized by treatment with phosphomolybdic acid or cerium molybdate solutions followed by heating.
A solution of methylphosphonothioic dichloride 12 (10 g, 49.6 mmol) in toluene (40 mL) was added slowly to a solution of (+)-ephedrine hydrochloride 13 (7.4 g, 49.6 mmol) dissolved in toluene (260 mL) and triethylamine (50 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The mixture was then filtered through Celite to remove triethylamine hydrochloride salt. The filtrate was washed with water (2 times), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture of diastereomers was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexanes/ethyl acetate, 9:1, v:v) to yield 2.0 g (white solid, 17%) of 14-Sp followed by 1.5 g (white solid, 13%) of 14-Rp. The enantiomers14-Sp and 14-Rp were verified as follows: (14-Sp), 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.27-7.39 (m, 5H), 5.67 (dd, J = 5.9, 2.3 Hz, 3H), 3.63 (apparent septet, 1H), 2.77 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 3H), 2.07 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 3H), 0.75 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H); +120.3° (c 0.052, CH3OH); and (14-Rp), 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.29-7.40 (m, 5H), 5.48 (dd, J = 5.6, 3.4 Hz, 3H), 3.63 (m, 1H), 2.68 (d, J = 12.7 Hz, 3H), 1.95 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 3H), 0.82 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H); (c 0.054, CH3OH).
A 1:1 mixture by volume of the requisite alcohol (ROH = a: isopropanol, b: cyclohexanol, c: 3,3-dimethyl-2-butanol) saturated with anhydrous hydrogen chloride and 2-butanone (3 mL) was added to individual solutions of 14 (Sp or Rp, 500 mg, 2.1 mmol) in 2-butanone (3.5 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and was stirred for 1 hour. The mixture was then poured into 10% (w/v) aq. sodium carbonate (12.5 mL), diluted with water (25 mL) and ethanol (40 mL). Pd/C (50 mg) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred under an atmosphere of H2 gas overnight at room temperature. The mixture was then flushed with N2 gas, filtered, and concentrated to remove the ethanol. The remaining aqueous mixture was diluted with water (10 mL) and extracted with diethyl ether (30 mL, 3 times). The organic layer was discarded. The aqueous layer was then acidified to pH < 3 with citric acid and extracted with 4:1 chloroform/isopropyl alcohol (15 mL, 5 times). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Sodium sulfate was removed by filtration, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to afford 15-17 as a clear viscous oil with the following yield: (15-Sp), 200 mg (63%); (15-Rp), 225 mg, (71%); (16-Sp), 270 mg (67%); (16-Rp), 313 mg (78%); (17-Sp), 152 mg (37%); and (17-Rp), 352 mg (86%). The crude product was used without further purification post NMR verification: (15), 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.70 (br s, 1H), 4.78 (septet, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 1.70 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 3H), 1.25 (apparent triplet, J = 6.0 Hz, 6H); (16), 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.11 (br s, 1H), 4.50 (m, 1H), 1.88 (m, 2H), 1.73 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 3H), 1.19-1.63 (m, 8H); and (17), 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) (2:1 mixture of diastereomers, major diastereomer) δ: 5.13 (br s, 1H), 4.33-4.43 (m, 1H), 1.70 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 3H), 1.22 (apparent triplet, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (s, 9H); (minor diastereomer, diagnostic peaks) δ: 1.77 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 3H), 1.09 (apparent triplet, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 0.9 (s, 9H).
The crude thiophosphonic acid [(15-Sp), 200 mg; (15-Rp), 225 mg; (16-Sp), 270 mg; (16-Rp), 313 mg; (17-Sp), 152 mg; and (17-Rp), 352 mg.] was directly dissolved in 10% (w/v) aqueous sodium carbonate (2.5 mL) and ethanol (10 mL). An excess of iodomethane (0.5 mL, 8.3 mmol) was added. The system was protected from light, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction was worked up by diluting the mixture with water and extracting with methylene chloride (3-5 times). The organic layers were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and concentrated in vacuo under light vacuum (400 torr) at mild temperature (~ 35 °C). The crude product was purified by silica gel PTLC to provide the final product. The overall yield and compound verification are as follows: (5-Sp), PTLC (100% ether) afforded 18 mg of a liquid (13%); (5-Rp), yielded 25 mg of a liquid (18%); (5), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 4.76-4.84 (m, 1H), 2.31 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 3H), 1.77 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 3H), 1.38 (dd, J = 6.3, 26.6 Hz, 6H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 53.9; (6-Sp), silica gel PTLC (ether/hexanes 4:1) afforded 54 mg of a liquid (31%); (6-Rp), yielded 26 mg of a liquid (15%); (6), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 4.46-4.53 (m, 1H), 2.3 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 3H), 1.90-2.01 (m, 1H), 1.9-1.93 (m, 1H), 1.77 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 3H), 1.69-1.78 (m, 2H), 1.45-1.57 (m, 3H), 1.29-1.38 (m, 2H), 1.17-1.25 (m, 1H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 53.8; (7-Sp), silica gel PTLC (ether/dichloromethane 1:1, v:v) afforded 27 mg of a liquid (15%); (7-Rp), yielded 12 mg of a liquid (7%); (7), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) major diastereomer δ: 4.26-4.32 (m, 1H), 2.34 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 3H), 1.78 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 3H), 1.37 (dd, J = 6.3, 11.5 Hz, 6H), 0.90 (s, 9H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 54.1; minor diastereomer, diagnostic peaks δ: 4.34-4.40 (m, 1H), 2.31 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 3H), 1.77 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 3H), 1.32 (dd, J = 6.3, 10.8 Hz, 6H), 0.92 (s, 9H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 53.5. Single peak was observed for 31P-NMR analysis of 5-7.
To the corresponding thiophosphonic acid 15-17 (15-Sp: 300 mg, 1.95 mmol, 15-Rp: 313 mg, 2.03 mmol, 16-Sp: 346 mg, 1.78 mmol, 16-Rp: 419 mg, 2.16 mmol, 17-Sp: 382 mg, 1.95 mmol, 17-Rp: 447 mg, 2.28 mmol) in ethanol (5 mL) and 10% (w/v) aq. sodium carbonate (8 mL) was added (2-iodoethyl)dimethylamine hydroiodide (1.0 equiv). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The mixture was then poured into saturated aqueous sodium chloride solution and extracted into dichloromethane. The organic layer was concentrated to yield a crude oil that was purified by silica gel flash column chromatography (0-30% (v/v) methanol in dichloromethane v:v, Teledyne ISCO CombiFlash Rf system, Newark, DE) to afford 18-20 as clear oils. The overall yield and compound verification are as follows: (18-Sp) 140 mg (32%), (18-Rp) 178 mg (39%), (19-Sp) 149 mg (32%), (19-Rp) 210 mg (43%), (20-Sp) 130 mg (25%), (20-Rp) 178 mg (34%); (18), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 4.72-4.78 (m, 1H), 2.90-3.01 (m, 2H), 2.54-2.62 (m, 2H), 2.26 (s, 6H), 1.75 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 3H), 1.30 (dd, J = 6.3, 30.6 Hz, 6H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 53.1; Rf (9:1 CH2Cl2: CH3OH) = 0.35; (19), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 4.50-4.43 (m, 1H), 2.89-3.03 (m, 2H), 2.57-2.66 (m, 2H), 2.28 (s, 6H), 1.93-1.99 (m, 1H), 1.86-1.91 (m, 1H), 1.77 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 3H), 1.67-1.74 (m, 2H), 1.42-1.56 (m, 3H), 1.27-1.36 (m, 2H), 1.15-1.24 (m, 1H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 53.0; Rf (9:1 CH2Cl2: CH3OH) = 0.34; (20), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) (major diastereomer) δ: 4.25-4.32 (m, 1H), 2.95-3.12 (m, 2H), 2.64-2.74 (m, 2H), 2.34 (s, 6H), 1.79 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 3H), 1.34, (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (s, 9H); (minor diastereomer's diagnostic peaks) δ: 4.30-4.35 (m, 1H), 1.28, (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (s, 9H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 53.3; Rf (9:1 CH2Cl2: CH3OH) = 0.32.
To a solution of 18-20 (18-Sp: 70 mg, 0.31 mmol, 18-Rp: 60 mg, 0.27 mmol, 19-Sp: 35 mg, 0.13 mmol, 19-Rp: 30 mg, 0.11 mmol, 20-Sp: 6 mg, 0.02 mmol, 20-Rp: 6 mg, 0.02 mmol) in benzene (1 mL) was added iodomethane (1 mL). This solution was allowed to stand at room temperature overnight and then concentrated and dried under high-vacuum to afford pure 8-10 as clear-light yellow oils. The overall yield and compound verification were as follows: (8-Sp) 109 mg (96%), (8-Rp) 69 mg (70%), (9-Sp) 50 mg (94%), (9-Rp) 10 mg (22%), (10-Sp) 6.5 mg (71%), (10-Rp) 5.8 mg (63%); (8), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 4.79-4.82 (m, 1H), 3.62-3.69 (m, 2H), 3.25-3.32 (m, 2H), 3.19 (s, 9H), 1.91 (d, J = 20.0 Hz, 3H), 1.37 (dd, J = 20.0, 5.0 Hz, 3H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 54.6; (9), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 4.49-455 (m, 1H), 3.61-3.69 (m, 2H), 3.21-3.32 (m, 2H), 3.18 (s, 9H), 1.9-1.96 (2H), 1.92 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 3H), 1.74-1.76 (m, 2H), 1.53-1.58 (m, 3H), 1.26-1.41 (m, 3H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 54.7; (10), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) major diastereomer δ: 4.31-4.37 (m, 1H), 3.59-3.68 (m, 2H), 3.22-3.32 (m, 2H), 3.18 (s, 9H), 1.93 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 3H), 1.32-1.39 (m, 3H), 0.92 (apparent t, J = 10.0 Hz, 9H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 54.9. Single peak was observed for 31P-NMR analysis of 8-10.
A solution of thiophosphoryl chloride 21 (4.2 mL, 41 mmol) in toluene (25 mL) was slowly added to a slurry of (+)-ephedrine 13 (8.60 g, 43 mmol) and triethylamine (35 mL) in toluene (150 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight and then poured into ethyl acetate and washed with water (3 times). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Sodium sulfate was removed by filtration, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to afford a yellow oil that solidified upon standing. The crude material was found to be a 1:3 mixture of the Rp:Sp isomers. Purification of the crude mixture of diastereomers consisted of passing the material through a silica column (4 inch height by 3 inch diameter) using dichloromethane as eluent followed by silica gel flash column chromatography (0-10% ethyl acetate/hexanes, v:v) to give 1.6 g (15%) of 22-Rp (top spot) and 5.52 g (53%) of 22-Sp (bottom spot). The compounds were verified by 1H-NMR analysis: (22-Rp), 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.30-7.44 (m, 5H), 5.83 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (dquint, 1H), 2.92 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 3H), 0.88 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H); and (22-Sp), 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.32-7.41 (m, 5H), 5.60 (t, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (sextet, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 3H), 0.80 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H).
A solution of 22 (Sp or Rp isomer, 1.0 g, 3.82 mmol) in dry toluene (10 mL) in a pressure tube was bubbled with anhydrous dimethylamine gas. After 1 minute, the tube was sealed and stirred at room temperature. After 4 hours, the mixture was filtered through Celite to remove the dimethylamine hydrochloride salt. The filtrate was diluted with ethyl acetate, and washed with water (2 times). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Sodium sulfate was removed by filtration, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to afford 23-Sp (1.03 g, 100%) or 23-Rp (1.03 g, 100%) as a yellow oil. The crude material was used without further purification. The compounds (23-Sp and 23-Rp) were verified by 1H-NMR analysis: 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.28-7.38 (m, 5H), 5.67 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 3.53 (sextet, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.95 (s, 3H), 2.91 (s, 3H), 2.60 (d, J = 11.8 Hz, 3H), 0.75 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H).
To a solution of 23-Sp (500 mg, 1.85 mmol) or 23-Rp (503 mg, 1.86 mmol) in absolute ethanol (2 mL) was added a solution of ethanol (2 mL) saturated with hydrogen chloride. After stirring at room temperature for 2 hours, the mixture was basified to pH~12 with aq. sodium hydroxide (10 N) and stirred at room temperature overnight. The mixture was extracted with diethyl ether (3 times). The organic layer was discarded and the aqueous layer acidified to pH < 3 with citric acid and extracted with 4:1 chloroform/isopropyl alcohol (3 times). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Sodium sulfate was removed by filtration, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to afford 24-Sp (308 mg, 98%) or 24-Rp (315 mg, 100%) as a clear viscous oil. The crude material was used without further purification. The compounds (24-Sp and 24-Rp) were verified by 1H-NMR analysis: 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 3.60 (quart, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (s, 3H), 2.79 (s, 3H), 1.32 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H).
To a solution of 24-Sp (645 mg, 3.81 mmol) or 24-Rp (315 mg, 1.86 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL) and 10% (w/v) aq. sodium carbonate (10 mL) was added (2-iodoethyl)dimethylamine hydroiodide (1.0 equiv.). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight and then poured into saturated aqueous sodium chloride solution and extracted with dichloromethane (3 times). The organic layer containing (S)-S-2-(dimethylamino)ethyl O-ethyl dimethylphosphoramidothioate (25-Sp or 25-Rp) was concentrated to ~3 mL then diluted with benzene (3 mL) and excess methyl iodide (3 mL) was added. The mixture was allowed to stand without stirring at room temperature overnight. The solid precipitate 11-Sp (127 mg, 9%) or 11-Rp (67 mg, 9%) was collected by decanting the liquid and drying under high vacuum. The compounds (11-Sp and 11-Rp) were verifiedas follows: 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 4.12-4.20 (m, 4H), 3.76 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 3.34 (s, 9H), 2.78 (s, 3H), 2.74 (s, 3H), 1.36 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H); 31P-NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 35.7; (11-Sp), +20.7 ° (c. 0.0075, CH3OH); (11-Rp), −20.1° (c. 0.0072, CH3OH). Single peak was observed for 31P-NMR analysis of 11.
The stability of the OP analogs bearing the thiocholine leaving group for GB, GD, GF, and GA (i.e., 8-11) was analyzed. The compounds were dissolved in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.2 at 0.5-1 mg mL−1, and the samples were kept at room temperature shielded from direct light. Aliquots were taken at selected time points and incubated with the Ellman reagent to detect buffer-mediated hydrolysis. The half-life of each compound was calculated from the molar extinction coefficient of 13,600 M−1cm−1 (23).
AChE and BChE activities were measured spectrophotometrically (Lambda 25, Perkin-Elmer, Palo Alto, CA) with an Ellman assay (23). Briefly, ATCh or BTCh was used as substrate for AChE and BChE, respectively, at 1 mM final concentration. The incubations were carried out in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) at 25°C in the presence of 0.2 mM DTNB. Hydrolysis was monitored continuously by absorbance at 412 nm. Functional activity was calculated from the molar extinction coefficient of 13,600 M−1cm−1 (23).
Because some of the Rp isomers from the thiomethyl analogs have low inhibition potencies for the cholinesterases, long-term incubation periods were needed to reliably determine the inhibition constants. To prevent loss of cholinesterase enzyme activity during incubation, 30 μg mL−1 of bovine milk β-lactoglobulin were included in the enzyme-inhibitor incubation mixture. Nerve agent model compounds were solubilized in acetonitrile (thiomethyl analogs) or DMSO (thiocholine analogs) and then diluted in H2O before use. Final solvent concentration in the inhibition mixtures was < 5%. Control experiments observed no impact on enzyme activity with < 5% solvent in the incubation mixture (i.e., BChE or AChE incubated with 30 μg mL−1 bovin milk β-lactoglobulin in 10 mM Tris buffer pH 7.6 at 25°C plus <5% acetonitrile or DMSO). Inhibition was initiated by mixing 3.6 × 10−3 IU of highly purified BChE or AChE with various amounts of each nerve agent analog (i.e., 5-11) in 30 μL final reaction volume in 10 mM Tris buffer pH 7.6. The inhibition mixtures were incubated at 25°C, and at defined times, 970 μL of reaction mixture was added to determine residual cholinesterase activity at 25°C as described above. For kinetic studies, five to seven concentrations of analog were used, and at least four time points of inhibition were taken for each concentration. Plots of ln(residual cholinesterase activity) versus incubation time afforded kapp (the apparent first order rate constant for inhibition at a given concentration of analog). A re-plot of the kapp versus the concentration of the nerve agent analog afforded the inhibition constant values. For hyperbolic re-plots, non-linear curve fitting to the equation kapp = k2[OP]/(KD+[OP]) afforded both phosphonylation rate constants k2 and equilibrium dissociation constants KD (24). Bimolecular rate constants ki were calculated from the ratio of the k2/KD. For linear re-plots, bimolecular rate constants ki were determined by linear regression analyses of the slope.
The thiomethyl analogues were optimized using Becke's three-parameter hybrid exchange functional with the Lee-Yang-Parr correlation functional (B3LYP) (25-27) method in conjunction with the 6-31+G* basis set in the Gaussian03 (28) suite of programs (29). The atomic charges were calculated using the CHarges from Electrostatic Potential Grid (CHELPG) (30) method as implemented in Gaussian03. Docking simulations for all of the thiomethyl analogues were carried out with the crystal structure of human BChE (PDB ID: 1P0I) (31) and with the aid of the AutoDock 4.0 program (32). The OP analogues as well as a few selected residues of BChE – namely, F329, Y332 and W82, of which F329 and Y332 residues are at the mouth of the gorge while W82 is the cation-π interaction site – were treated as flexible residues during these docking simulations. All of the non-polar hydrogens were merged before performing the grid calculations for the docking protocol. The grid box covered the entire gorge and surroundings of the active site, and was of 60 × 60 × 60 Å3 volume with the grid spacing of 0.2972 Å. A total of 2,500,000 energy evaluations with 250,000 generations were used along with a total of 200 standard genetic algorithm docking simulations for each of the analogues. The preparation for human AChE (PDB ID:1B41) (33) was carried out with slightly modified parameters. A smaller grid was created, of dimensions 50 × 50 × 50 Å3, and with a slightly finer spacing of 0.275 Å. A total of 200 genetic docking simulations were carried out for each of the model compounds.
All linear and non-linear regression analyses were done with Graphpad Prism Programs (Version 3.00, Graphpad, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Best fit values and standard errors are presented.
The structures of the nerve agent model compounds synthesized for this study are shown in Table 1. The synthetic route followed the procedures described previously (18, 21, 22). Schemes 1 and and22 illustrated the synthesis of enantiomerically enriched Sp isoforms. Synthesis of the corresponding Rp isomers followed the same synthetic scheme using alternative diastereomeric intermediates (i.e., 14-Rp in Scheme 1 and 22-Sp in Scheme 2). The synthetic method utilized (+)-ephedrine to form a diastereomeric mixture at the phosphorus center of chirality that was separable by silica gel column chromatography. The identification of the phosphorus diastereomers (Sp or Rp) was done by comparison of the 1H-NMR spectra to the literature report (18). Each diastereomer was then taken forward to form the nerve agent analog that was enantiomerically-enriched about the phosphorus center. 2-Iodo-N,N-dimethylethanamine hydroiodide (34) was used as the alkylating reagent for the synthesis in the thiocholine analogs (i.e., 8-11). The pinacolyl alcohol used to synthesize 7 and 10 was a racemic mixture and resulted in a diastereomeric carbon center (Sc and Rc) in 7 and 10. Phosphorus isomers 7-Sp and 10-Sp consisted of a mixture of SpSc and SpRc forms, and similarly 7-Rp and 10-Rp analogs were mixtures of RpSc and RpRc forms. 5 and 7 have been reported previously (18), while the remaining 10 analogs are novel. Analytically pure products were obtained by flash column chromatography, PTLC or filtration. Optical purity was analyzed for selected OP compounds. The common intermediates 14-Sp and 14-Rp provided match values to previously reported mirror image compounds (18). Compounds 11-Sp and 11-Rp exhibited equal and opposite optical rotations, substantiating the optical purity obtained during separation of the diastereomeric reactants. Spiking of 14-Sp with 1% and 2% 14-Rp was readily detected by 1H-NMR analysis. This confirmed that 1H-NMR analysis of compound 14-Sp and 14-Rp post chromatographic separation was a valid method to verify overall chemical purity as well as diastereomeric purity for 14-Sp and 14-Rp (data not shown). Because the separation of 14-Sp and 14-Rp was the only chiral separation step in the entire synthesis, we believe the diastereomeric purity of 14-Sp and 14-Rp represented the enantiomeric purity of compounds Sp and Rp 5-10, respectively.
The aqueous stability (pH = 7.4) of the OP analogs bearing the thiocholine leaving group for GB, GD, GF, and GA (i.e., 8-11) indicated that with the exception of 8, all compounds showed no detectable degradation after seven days in phosphate buffer. Compounds 8 showed a half-life of 57 hours under these conditions. The stability of the thiomethyl leaving group analogs was not extensively examined, however, overnight incubation in buffer conditions did not show any detectable level of hydrolysis.
The thiomethyl analogs were poor inhibitors of both AChE and BChE. Incubation times of up to 30 minutes were required to achieve acceptable levels of inhibition with these relatively low potency inhibitors. The long incubation times presented a technical problem. Significant decreases in the enzyme activities were observed after 30 minutes when control experiments were run in the absence of inhibitor. AChE lost 40% of its starting activity and BChE lost 32% (data not shown). Such loss of activity is commonly due to the adsorption of enzyme to the reaction vessel surface. Due to variable amounts of bovine serum BChE contamination in commercial preparations of bovine serum albumin, bovine serum albumin was not used in these assays. Ultimately, β-lactoglobulin from goat milk, at 30 μg mL−1, was selected to protect the cholinesterases based on the following factors: 1) no detectable cholinesterase activity was associated with the commercial product; 2) no interference of either AChE or BChE inhibition by the analogs was observed based on comparable kinetics when highly potent analogs were tested in the presence and absence of the carrier protein, and 3) over 95% enzyme activity was retained for both AChE and BChE, after incubation for over 90 minutes in the presence of the carrier protein. Although the carrier protein was only needed for kinetic measurement of low potency inhibitors, it was included in all experiments to ensure comparable results for all assays.
To determine the kinetic parameters for phosphonylation by the different nerve agent analog stereoisomers, AChE was incubated with various concentrations of the analogs for different time periods. At the end of each incubation period, the enzyme inhibitor mixture was diluted 33-fold into the assay mixture to measure remaining cholinesterase hydrolysis activity. The activity of AChE decreased exponentially over the time course of the experiments. Apparent rate constants (kapp) for the inhibition were obtained from linear regression analysis of the semi-logarithmic plots of ln(residual AChE activity) versus time of incubation (Figure 1). Replots of kapp versus inhibitor concentration showed saturation condition at higher OP analog concentrations (Figure 2A and 2B) to allow calculation of k2 and KD based on non-linear curve fitting analysis.
For human AChE, Sp isomers were substantially more potent inhibitors than Rp isomers with the second order inhibition constants in the 103 to 104 M−1min−1 range for Sp enantiomers, and in the 102 to 103 M−1min−1 range for Rp enantiomers (Table 2). The 6-Sp provided the most significant stereoselectivity (i.e., 28-fold greater potency compared with 6-Rp ), while approximately 10-fold stereoselectivity (Sp/Rp) was found for the 5 and 7 (Table 2). The greater potency of the Sp enantiomers for AChE was largely dependent on greater phosphonylation rates by the Sp analogs. The k2 values for 5-Sp, 6-Sp, and 7-Sp were greater than their corresponding Rp analogs by 20-, 7-, and 16-fold, respectively. The affinity of AChE for the analogs was greatest for 6-Sp and lowest for 5-Sp. The affinity for all the Rp enantiomers was not significantly different. A ranking of the inhibition potency for the six compounds determined on the basis of their second order inhibition rate constants was as follows: 6-Sp > 7-Sp > 6-Rp > 7-Rp ≈ 5-Sp > 5-Rp.
It is noteworthy that extrapolation of the inhibition time courses back to time zero did not result in a common intercept for inhibition by 7-Sp and 7-Rp (Figure 1E and 1F). Under normal circumstances, such an extrapolation would be expected to yield a common intercept that represented the initial, uninhibited activity of the enzyme. The extrapolated intercepts for these inhibitors fell below the uninhibited activity. Furthermore, the more inhibitor that was used in the incubation, the lower the extrapolated intercept became. Such behavior indicated that a portion of the AChE was being inhibited immediately upon mixing with the inhibitor. A similar pattern has been observed with studies for Torpedo AChE (18) and mouse AChE (35) using similar compounds. In both reports, the initial phase of complex formation was not investigated further. There are two common causes for such behavior. The first would be non-covalent complex formation between the inhibitor and AChE. This would require that the concentration of inhibitor, at the time of the assay, be comparable to the dissociation constant for the inhibitor-AChE complex. However, since the activity assay involved a 33-fold dilution of the inhibitor-AChE complex and the starting inhibitor concentration never saturated the non-covalent complex (see Figure 2A), it is unlikely that the non-covalent inhibitor-AChE complex was present to a significant extent in the activity assay. In addition, the assay conditions included an excess of substrate, which competed with the inhibitor for non-covalent binding to the AChE. Together, these conditions make a non-covalent inhibitor-AChE complex an unlikely choice to explain the zero time inhibition. An alternative possibility is rapid reaction with a contaminant in the analog preparation. Because the amount of the zero time inhibition appeared to be limited, at any given inhibitor concentration, the concentration of the rapid inhibitor would have to be less than the concentration of the enzyme at sub-stoichiometric conditions. Because the nominal concentration of the inhibitor was in the mM range, while the concentration of AChE was in the nM range, any rapidly reacting inhibitor must have been present at levels 10−6-fold less than the principal inhibitor. As such, a very minor contaminant, but a very potent inhibitor may be operating to afford the results observed. Kinetic parameters for these analogs were determined using the slow linear phase portion of the reaction disregarding the initial complex formation.
With the exception of 7-Rp, all inhibition incubations for human BChE showed the same hyperbolic profile as that of AChE (Figure 2C and 2D). BChE inhibition by 7-Rp showed marked biphasic behavior, with a fast inhibition that was complete in the initial 15 seconds of incubation, followed by a very slow inhibition that could not be reliably measured. Kinetic parameters for 7-Rp were not reported, because measurement of the slow inhibition kinetics was unreliable. The initial, rapid inhibition was similar to the rapid, mixing time inhibition described for AChE. For the GB and GF model compounds, the Sp isomers consistently showed greater potency for BChE inhibition than the Rp isomers, with second order inhibition rate constants in the 102 to 104 M−1min−1 range for the Sp enantiomers and 101 to 102 M−1min−1 range for the Rp enantiomers (Table 2). 6-Sp provided 47-fold greater inhibition potency compared to the 6-Rp. Both 5-Sp and 6-Sp showed greater k2 values against BChE than their Rp counterparts. 6-Sp and 7-Sp showed comparable dissociation constants and were the two compounds with greatest inhibition potency toward BChE (Table 2). The overall rank order of the five compounds for BChE inhibition potency was 6-Sp > 7-Sp > 6-Rp ≈ 5-Sp > 5-Rp. The rank order is in agreement with the ranking described above for AChE.
To extend the structure-activity relationship enzyme inhibition studies, a series of thiocholine-containing nerve agent model compounds were synthesized and studied (8-11, Table 1, Schemes 1 and and2).2). For all inhibition reactions examined except for 10-Rp toward BChE, the activity of both AChE and BChE decreased exponentially with the time of incubation in the presence of the thiocholine analogs. Plots of ln(residual cholinesterase activity) versus time of incubation were linear (data not shown). For 10-Rp incubation with BChE, initial rapid inhibition similar to that described above for AChE was evident. A linear portion of the slow phase inhibition kinetics was used to obtain kapp. Replots of kapp versus inhibitor concentration were linear for all AChE incubations (Figure 3A, B) and most BChE incubations (Figure 3C). Linear curve fitting afforded bimolecular rate constants (ki in Table 3). For reactions with BChE in the presence of Rp isomers of GB, GF, and GD model compounds, replots of kapp versus inhibitor concentration approached saturation (Figure 3D) and afforded k2 and KD values (Table 3). Bimolecular rate constant determined for the control compound ETP were 1.8 × 106 M−1min−1 for AChE and 2.6 × 106 M−1min−1 for BChE. These values were in good agreement with literature values of 1.5 × 106 M−1min−1 for AChE (6) and 3.2 × 106 M−1min−1 for BChE (36).
Compared with the thiomethyl analogs 5-7, the thiocholine analogs 8-10 were much more potent inhibitors of both human AChE and BChE. The second order inhibition rate constants for the thiocholine analogs were in the range of 1 × 105 to 4 × 107 M−1min−1 for the Sp enantiomers and 4 × 104 to 8 × 105 M−1min−1 range for the Rp enantiomers (Table 3). The overall rank order of the eight compounds for AChE inhibition potency was 9-Sp > 8-Sp > 10-Sp > (9-Rp, 10-Rp, 8-Rp) > 11-Sp > 11-Rp. The rank order for BChE inhibition potency was 9-Sp > 10-Sp > (11-Sp, 8-Sp) > (9-Rp, 8-Rp, 11-Rp) > 10-Rp. The Sp enantiomers consistently showed greater potency for both AChE and BChE compared with the Rp enantiomers, with the greatest stereoselectivity being observed for 9-Sp > 9-Rp with 52-fold potency against AChE (Table 3). Compounds 11 showed less than 4-fold stereoselectivity for both AChE and BChE, and were the least potent pair of inhibitors against AChE. For reaction of 8-Rp, 9-Rp, 10-Rp with BChE, equilibrium dissociation constants KD were in the range of 4-11 μM (Table 3), a markedly greater affinity compared to the corresponding values for the thiomethyl analogs (Table 2).
Docking simulations of the thiomethyl analogues were done for optimal placing of the OP analogues into the catalytic gorge of human AChE and BChE (Figure 4 for compound 5 in BChE). Both 5-Sp and 5-Rp was found to have two binding orientations in BChE with either thiomethyl group (Figure 4A, 4C) or alkoxy group (Figure 4B, 4D) at the apical position. Based on the calculated binding free energy, the docking of 5-Sp was more favorable than 5-Rp; and docking positions with alkoxy group at the apical position were slightly more favorable than the alternative positions for both 5-Sp and 5-Rp. Similarly, docking of 6-Sp and 7-Sp in BChE showed both orientations, with alkoxy group at the apical position slightly more favorable. In the case of the docking simulations with 6-Rp, the binding orientations with a thiomethyl group at the apical position similar to that shown in Figure 4C was observed to be more favorable both statistically as well as energetically. This selective binding can be attributed to favorable van der Waals interaction of the cyclohexyl group with the residues that created the spacious acyl pocket of BChE. For 7-Rp, the binding orientation with the alkoxy group at the apical position similar to that shown in Figure 4D was dominantly favorable. An alternative position with the thiomethyl group at the apical position created unfavorable steric interaction as the bulky pinacolyl group lies under the acyl loop. Binding orientations were not identified for all OP analogues in AChE, making specific trends difficult to ascertain. However, the results for 6 and 7 suggest that for Sp isomers, orientations leading to P–S cleavage are more favorable than those leading to P–O cleavage.
The potency for irreversible inhibition of the enantiomerically enriched thiomethyl and thiocholine analogs was determined for both human AChE and BChE to compare the stereoselectivity and overall inhibition potency. Sp and Rp forms of 5 and 8, both GB model compounds, have been used in previous reports (18). They were prepared using chemical synthesis and purification procedures similar to those reported here. The potency of 5 against human BChE (Table 2) was comparable to that reported for Torpedo AChE (i.e., 317 M−1min−1 for 5-Sp and 15 M−1min−1 for 5-Rp) (18) and mouse AChE (i.e., 310 M−1min−1 for 5-Sp and 1.7 M−1min−1 for 5-Rp) (20). The potency for 8 against human AChE (Table 3) was comparable to that reported for Torpedo AChE (1.3 × 107 M−1min−1 for 8-Sp and 0.87 × 105 M−1min−1 for 8-Rp) (18) and mouse AChE (1.6 × 107M−1min−1 for 8-Sp and 1.5 × 105 M−1min−1 for 8-Rp) (19). Chemical synthesis and inhibition kinetics for the other compounds described herein have not been reported previously.
The inhibition of cholinesterase by OPs occurs through nucleophilic attack of the active site serine on the phosphorus atom that results in the formation of a pentavalent, bipyramidal intermediate. The intermediate is not stable, and the functional group in the apical position opposite the serine detaches, yielding a phosphylated enzyme adduct. From a chemical reactivity point of view, thiols are much more acidic than similar alcohols, with estimated pKa values of 10 for RSH versus pKa values of 16-19 for ROH (where R is a non-charged alkyl group). Therefore, thiolates are generally predicted to be better leaving groups than similar alkoxides. For the nerve agent model compounds being examined in this report, phosphonylation is predicted to release the thiomethyl group or the thiocholine group, yielding a phosphonylated enzyme adduct identical to those formed by the authentic nerve agents. The pKa value of thiocholine is 7.8 (37), that is significantly lower than the pKa of a thiomethyl group (10.4) due to the through space electron withdrawing nature of the ammonium cation present in the choline group. Thus, the thiocholine group makes a much better leaving group than the thiomethyl group. In addition to chemical reactivity, a previous report from Hosea et al. (20) showed that Asp74 in mouse AChE was essential for high potency inhibition of related thiocholine analogs. The study indicated that the thiocholine leaving group was oriented upward in the gorge of mouse AChE, pointing toward the peripheral anionic binding site (20). This position puts the thiocholine on the opposite side of the phosphorus from the attacking active site serine, which is essential for thiocholine to perform as a leaving group for phosphonylation. By comparison, the thiomethyl group lacks a positive charge and is substantially smaller than the thiocholine. These features enable the thiomethyl group to have less interaction with the peripheral anionic site to ensure correct positioning to function as a leaving group. Correlating the kinetic study with product formation characterization and molecular dynamic simulations confirmed these predictions.
Mass spectral analysis by Dr. Lockridge (38) examining the adducts formed from BChE during incubation with the nerve agent model compounds from Table 1 revealed that phosphonylation by the thiocholine analogs (i.e., 8, 9, and 10) resulted in adducts that were the consequence of thiocholine release. However, for the thiomethyl analogs, only 6-Sp and 6-Rp yielded phosphonylated enzyme adducts that were the result of thiomethyl being the sole leaving group. In contrast, the GB and GD model compounds, 5 and 7, released either the thiomethyl or the alkoxy group (i.e., isopropyl for 5, and pinacolyl for 7). As discussed above, thiocholine has a greater chemical propensity, and is better oriented in the protein to serve for leaving group phosphonylation. For the thiomethyl analogs, lack of a strong preference for the thiomethyl group enabled the alkoxy group to be a competitive leaving group. Such a rationalization could explain why a single adduct was formed by thiocholine analogs while a mixture of adducts was formed by the thiomethyl phosphonates (40).
To understand the impact of multiple complex formations for 5 and 7 on inhibition kinetics, a kinetic model was built to describe the events (data not shown). The model predicted no biphasic nature for the inhibition kinetics under the first-order assay conditions employed in this study. The inhibition potency reported here for 5 and 7 represents the combined apparent inhibition potency contributed from both complexes. Even though molecular dynamics is limited in offering explanations for kinetic events because the simulation studies only examined the pre-dissociative complexes and do not consider transition states and other kinetic events, the study still offered many clues explaining the kinetic observations. Based on molecular dynamic analysis, the two docking positions give comparable energy values suggesting similar binding affinity, explaining why the derived apparent KD values for 5-Sp and 5-Rp are not significantly different. Molecular dynamic studies also indicated that for both 5-Rp and 7-Rp, docking orientations with alkoxy groups positioned as leaving groups are more favorable. This suggested that the apparent k2 values for 5-Rp and 7-Rp are affected to a greater extent by the P-O cleavage event, rendering lower k2 values for the Rp isoform. Alternative binding orientations and inhibition mechanisms have been characterized comprehensively for the (1R)- and (1S)-isomalathion stereoisomers to reveal different primary leaving groups and subsequent aging mechanism (39, 40). The thiomethyl analogs examined here exhibited more flexibility in the catalytic site and allowed both binding orientations to yield phosphonylated adducts.
With regard to stereoselectivity of inhibition, the results showed that for both the thiomethyl and the thiocholine analogs reacting with either AChE or BChE, there is a pronounced stereoselective preference for the Sp analog over its Rp counterpart. The extent of that preference varied depending on the analog pair examined as well as the enzyme target. In AChE, the acyl binding pocket is a small space that was designed to accommodate the methyl group of the acyl moiety of the substrate. The space would be suitable for the methyl group of nerve agents or of the model compounds reported here, but not for large alkoxy groups. For the thiocholine analogs in this study, if the phosphoryl oxygen was fixed in the oxyanion hole and the thiol leaving group was oriented upward in the gorge, then either the methyl or the alkoxy group would have to be placed in the acyl binding pocket depending on the stereochemistry of the analog. A Sp stereoisomer that placed a methyl group in the acyl pocket would be expected to fit much better than an Rp stereoisomer that places a bulky alkoxy group into this position. This prediction is confirmed by the finding that the GF analog pairs that have the most bulky alkoxy substituent, showed the most prominent stereoselectivity for both AChE and BChE. The GA analog pairs are distinct from the other analog pairs because of the presence of the dimethylamino group instead of the methyl group. The steric difference between positioning the ethoxy group or the dimethylamino group in the acyl binding pocket is not significant. This is reflected by the < 4-fold stereoselectivity observed for GA model compounds reacting with both AChE and BChE. This low degree of stereoselectivity is in agreement with the reported ~7-fold difference in LD50 for GA Rp and Sp isomers (41).
Stereoselectivities previously reported for inhibition of AChE and BChE by GD diastereomers was far greater than our results. DeBisschop et al. found a 300-fold difference between soman SpSc and RpSc for binding to human BChE (7). Ordentlich et al. reported a 40,000-fold difference between soman SpSc and RpSc for binding to human AChE (8). The results reported here for the GD model compounds might be less pronounced because of the presence of the racemic mixture about the carbon center of the pinacolyl group. While the configuration around the carbon atom of the pinacolyl group showed little selection on electric eel AChE, SpRc showed 2- and 10-fold lower potency than SpSc for human AChE (4, 7, 8). In addition, because the compounds were prepared as enantiomerically-enriched forms, we cannot rule out the possibility of a small cross-contamination between the Rp and Sp isomers based on NMR analysis. A small percent cross contamination of the Sp isomer in the Rp preparation could limit the apparent inhibition rate for Rp to a small percent of that of the Sp isomer, thereby increasing the apparent potency for the Rp isomers. Because the 9 GF analog offered enough inhibition potency (ki of 2.4 × 106 M−1min−1), we were able to evaluate inhibition of 9-Rp under sub-stoichiometric conditions (data not shown) and confirmed that the potential contamination of 9-Sp should be less than 1%. Examining potential contamination Rp isomer in Sp isomer is technical challenging, however, the impact of a small percent cross-contamination from the Rp isomer on inhibition kinetics of the more reactive Sp isomer should be minor and off less concern. We conclude that the stereoselectivity determined from these enantiomerically-enriched compounds reported could represent an underestimated value of the true ratio from enantiomerically pure compounds. Regardless of this limitation, we believe these model compounds are useful tools for evaluation of stereoselectivity for different enzymes and for the application of the Sp isomers in the development of OP hydrolysis bioscavengers.
In summary, kinetic studies of the thiomethyl- and thiocholine-series of nerve agent model compounds revealed the potential as well as some limitations of these compounds for future applications. Simulation studies provide a molecular-level understanding of the orientation of the thiomethyl analogues prior to inhibition, and the docking modes obtained are consistent with the experimental findings. The stereoselectivity, enzyme selectivity, and dynamic range of inhibition potency of the two series of compounds suggest that the combined application of these model compounds will make them useful research tools for understanding interactions of nerve agents with cholinesterase and other enzymes of interest. These two series of compounds provide a useful panel of agents to examine the profile of enzyme interaction with GB, GF, GD, and GA. The distinct features contributed from the non-charged small thiomethyl group and the charged larger thiocholine group make them useful in studies comparing diverse OP compounds and enzyme interactions. The stereoselective inhibition of both AChE and BChE suggest that these model compounds (especially the thiocholine analogs) that produce the same phosphonylation enzyme adducts as the authentic nerve agents, can serve as useful tools to examine the stereoselectivity about the phosphorus chiral center for enzyme variants produced from bioscavenger development programs.
This research was supported by the National Institute of Health grant U54NS058183 Project 2 to JZ and Project 4 to CMH, U01NS058038 to JRC, and USAMRICD contract V91ZLK-06-R-0029 to JZ. We thank Dr. Oksana Lockridge and Dr. Lawrence Schopfer (UNMC, Omaha, NE), Dr. Florian Nachon (Centre de Recherches du Service de Santé des Armées, La Tronche, France), and Dr. Erik Ralph (Human BioMolecular Research Institute, San Diego, CA) for their critical discussions and valuable suggestions regarding the manuscript. We also thank Dr. Yongxuan Su (UCSD Molecular MS Facility, San Diego, CA) for MS and MS/MS analysis. Technical assistance of Ms. Melissa Ackley and Ms. Beilin Wang are also gratefully appreciated.