PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Urol Oncol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2761743
NIHMSID: NIHMS117397

MicroRNAs and their Potential for Translation in Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Objective

Patients die of prostate cancer (CaP) because predictably after a period of response to androgen withdrawal, their CaP becomes castrate resistant. In this paper we discuss the role that microRNA's (miRNAs) may play in this process.

Methods

miRNAs are a group of endogenous, small non-coding RNA molecules that are thought to be responsible for the regulation of up to 30% of gene expression. The miRNA expression profile between androgen responsive and castrate resistance CaP cell lines is compared. Functional studies were carried out to identify the importance of the microRNA's targets in controlling this process.

Results

There were 17 differentially expressed miRNAs found, 10 up-regulated and 7 down-regulated. Among these, miRNA-126b was found to have the ability of rendering LNCaP cells resistant to androgen withdrawal. It was found to be androgen regulated and one of its targets, BAK1, was identified as being involved in how these CaP cells undergo apoptosis functionally.

Conclusion

miRNA-125b, at least in the CaP cell lines tested, is involved in the development of castrate resistance. While clearly, this miRNA is only part of the answer, miRNA's may lead us in a new direction in trying to solve the central problem in CaP.

Keywords: MicroRNA, Prostate Cancer, Androgen-Independent

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a group of endogenous, small, non-coding RNA molecules that are thought to be responsible for the regulation of up to 30% of gene expression [1]. Recent investigations have revealed that miRNAs have unique expression profiles in different cancer types at different stages and play an important role in the initiation and progression of many diseases. These features make miRNAs ideal candidates for use as both biomarkers and therapeutic targets. MiRNAs are initially transcribed in the nucleus as long primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) that are then processed to produce hairpin-like miRNA precursors (pre-miRNAs) that are ~70 nt in length. The pre-miRNAs are transported to the cytoplasm where they are further processed into mature miRNAs with a final length of ~22 bases [2, 3]. A multitude of publications have demonstrated that miRNAs regulate gene expression. Mature miRNAs bind to their target mRNAs by complete or incomplete complementation of their 5′-end nucleotides 1-8 (seed sequences) with a binding site in the 3′- or 5-untranslated regions (UTRs) of target transcripts. This process results in direct cleavage of the targeted mRNAs or inhibition of translation [4, 5]. Currently, nearly 500 human miRNAs have been identified. It is postulated that up to ~1000 miRNAs exist [6]. Bioinformatic analyses have predicted that each miRNA recognizes on average about 100 different mRNA targets [6-8] meaning that each miRNA has the potential to mediate the regulation of a great number of protein-coding genes. Unsurprisingly studies have shown that miRNAs play a role in almost all biological processes in mammals, including cell proliferation, differentiation, stress response, apoptosis, immunity, and transcriptional regulation [9].

Over the last few years, miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional or translational regulation of protein-coding genes has emerged as a promising area of research. MiRNA can mediate rapid changes in protein synthesis without the need for transcriptional activation and subsequent mRNA processing steps [10]. This regulation provides the cell with a more precise, immediate, and energy-efficient mechanism for controlling the expression of proteins.

miRNA's and human cancer

When human miRNAs were discovered, it was noticed that many miRNAs are located in cancer-associated genomic regions that are commonly amplified or deleted in human cancer [11, 12], suggesting a linkage between miRNAs and carcinogenesis. Indeed, later studies verified that aberrant expression of some miRNAs occurs in many different types of human cancer [13, 14]. The aberrant expression of several miRNAs has recently been reported to promote cell survival and tumor growth [15-19]. These observations strongly suggest that miRNAs play a critical role in the pathogenesis of cancer. In cancer cells, many factors affect the cellular abundance of miRNAs, including miRNA gene copy gain or loss [20], mutation of precursor miRNAs [21], hypermethylation and histone deacetylation of the miRNA promoter [22, 23], and aberrant miRNA processing [24]. In the past years, differential expression of miRNAs has been reported in benign and malignant tissues, in different types of cancer, and in different stages of disease progression [25-27]. Both increased and decreased expression of miRNA's can contribute to cancer pathogenesis. In the case of “tumor suppressor” miRNAs, their downregulation would result in increased expression of oncogene or proliferation-related genes. An example is miR-15/16 that acts as a tumor suppressor by targeting translation of BCL-2 mRNA, but is diminished in >50% of cases of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [28].

miRNA in Prostate Cancer

Thus it is reasonable to ask if studies of miRNAs can help in our understanding and treatment of prostate cancer (CaP). Aberrant expression of several miRNAs has been found in CaP cell lines and in CaP clinical specimens. The table below is constructed as a summary of four recent papers that analyzed miRNA expression comparing in each case normal prostate versus prostate cancer tissue [29-32].

One of the most promising aspects of analyzing miRNAs in patient specimens is that the miRNAs are extremely stable. It is concerning that there is so little agreement on the miRNAs found in each of these studies. This limitation has been noted previously and was indeed addressed in the above papers. The discussion of the technical issues that may have led to these differences is beyond the scope of this paper. However, it does need to be recognized and addressed otherwise a great deal of time, effort and funds may be spent on chasing false leads.

Having found the aberrantly expressed miRNAs, it is then necessary to find the CaP-related targets of these miRNAs. Considering that a given miRNA may have up to 100 mRNA targets, the issue is how to decide which of these targets may be biologically active and important. Without a bioinformatics method to do this, again a tremendous amount of time may be spent on false leads.

With the above issues in mind, we decided to study if miRNAs might be differentially expressed in androgen dependent (AD) and androgen independent (AI) CaP cell lines.

Differential expression of miRNAs in androgen dependent (AD) and androgen independent (AI) prostate cancer (CaP) cells

In order to explore the role of miRNAs in CaP, we investigated the differential expression of 132 miRNAs in AD LNCaP cells and the related AI subline LNCaP-cds1 (named cds1 [33]) using miRNA microarray. Using a 3-fold difference as cut-off, 17 differentially-expressed miRNAs were identified, 10 being upregulated and 7 downregulated in cds1 cells related to LNCaP cells (Table 1). Northern blot analysis of five miRNAs (red in Tab. 1) validated the microarray results (Fig. 1A). As shown in Figure 1B, it was found that: 1) when compared to two benign prostate lines, most CaP lines had increased expression of miR-125b; 2) Five androgen receptor (AR)-positive cell lines (CWR22R, PC-346C, LNCaP, cds1 and cds2) expressed more miR-125b than four AR-negative lines (DU145, PC3, pRNS-1-1 and RWPE-1); 3) When compared to the AD/S parental LNCaP cells, the AI cds1 and cds2 cells expressed 5-fold increased levels of miR-125b. These findings suggest that miR-125b may be related to prostatic tumorigenesis and AI growth, and the AR may regulate the expression of this miRNA in CaP cells.

Table thumbnail
Summary of miRNA array data from studies of normal prostate versus prostate cancer tissue

As we have previously published [34], we showed that transfection of miRNA-125b into LNCaP cells allows them to grow in an androgen depleted media.

  • Antisensing miRNA-125b in cds cells in which it is elevated decreased cell growth.
  • miR-125b was expressed in CaP clinical specimens. The above data suggests that this miRNA could have an oncogenic role in CaP.
  • The next question was what were the targets of miR-125b. Database searches showed that the most likely target to have biological activity was BAK1 [35, 36].
  • By western blot analysis we showed that miR-125b reduced BAK1 expression while antisensing miRNA-125b upregulated BAK1.
  • In Northern Blotting, both LNCaP [low miRNA-125b] and cds1 [high miRNA-125b], showed that androgen up-regulated miRNA-125b.
  • By CHIP analysis, we showed that AR loaded to the 5′ prime DNA region of miRNA-125b.
  • In keeping with AR up-regulating miRNA-125b, we showed that Casodex repressed expression of miRNA-125b.
  • When we blocked BAK1, we did not get the same growth reduction in cds1 cells as had been achieved by blocking miRNA-125b. This was not unexpected and showed other targets of miRNA-125b were helping to sustain the AI growth of our CaP cells.

We have also developed a bioinformatics strategy to determine the most likely targets of miR-125b that would be biologically relevant in sustaining the AI growth of our CaP cells. This approach essentially enabled us to extract the predicted miR-125b target genes from AI-specific gene expression profiles and subsequently define their associations within signal transduction networks and with biological processes. It was readily apparent that a prominent action of miR-125b might be to decrease apoptosis susceptibility through disruption of the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway, specifically via suppression of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins which have distinct functions. In addition to BAK1 (described above), the bioinformatics search identified PUMA/BBC3 as another potential miR-125b target. Bak1 is pro-apoptotic, but is usually kept inactive by binding to Bcl-2. Puma's pro-apoptotic activity is attributed to its ability to bind and displace Bcl-2 from Bak1, thereby rendering the latter active. While validation studies are ongoing, they certainly imply that blocking miRNA-125b would be more effective, and possibly more feasible, than attempting to reactivate just one of its targets (e.g., BAK1). This also points to the complexity of miRNA actions in cells. We are hopeful that the identification of further miRNAs and subsequent miRNA-based therapies (blocking or restoration) will have real translational use in managing CaP.

Detection of circulating microRNAs

Cancers effect the levels of microRNAs in the blood stream where they are very stable in both plasma and serum (ref 37 and 38) which has led to the idea of utilizing them as blood based biomarker for cancer detection. Mitchell et al, recently reported that there is a 6.35 fold increase in miR-125b in the sera of patients with metastatic CaP compared to sera from healthy men (37). In the case of miR-141 the differential expression was 46 fold. This study involved 25 patients with metastatic disease. The authors reported a 60% sensitivity and 100% specificity utilizing miR-141. Clearly, a 65% sensitivity in patients with metastatic CaP is unsatisfactory in terms of using this as a potiential marker. However, no information is given in this article regarding the treatment status of the patients, or if on therapy, whether they were responding. These results should not deter us from persuing further investigation of the potential use of circulating microRNA's as a biomarker in CaP. This could be persued by comparing the positivity of microRNA's in the patient's tumor and serum. In patients who have blood available prior to and after a radical retropubic prostatectomy, comparisons could be made between the level of microRNA in the prostate specimen as compared to levels found in the pre and post surgical serum samples. Similarly, serum from patients with metastatic disease could be tested prior to and after the initiation of therapy. In such a mannor, could the role of microRNAs as biomarkers in CaP be determined.

In conclusion, the exact role that micrRNAs play in the pathogenisis and particularly in the conversion of androgen independent CaP to castrtate resistance prostate cancer remains to be determined. However, results in other cancers and the early results in CaP are encouraging. Clearly, there is reason to hope that understaning the roles that microRNAs play in this process may lead to the development of new biomarkers and new therapies for this disease.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Xie X, et al. Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in human promoters and 3′ UTRs by comparison of several mammals. Nature. 2005;434(7031):338–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Lund E, et al. Nuclear export of microRNA precursors. Science. 2004;303(5654):95–8. [PubMed]
3. Lee Y, et al. MicroRNA maturation: stepwise processing and subcellular localization. Embo J. 2002;21(17):4663–70. [PubMed]
4. Lai EC. Micro RNAs are complementary to 3′ UTR sequence motifs that mediate negative post-transcriptional regulation. Nat Genet. 2002;30(4):363–4. [PubMed]
5. Lytle JR, Yario TA, Steitz JA. Target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by microRNA-binding sites in the 5′ UTR as in the 3′ UTR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(23):9667–72. [PubMed]
6. Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120(1):15–20. [PubMed]
7. Brennecke J, et al. Principles of microRNA-target recognition. PLoS Biol. 2005;3(3):e85. [PubMed]
8. Lim LP, et al. Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs. Nature. 2005;433(7027):769–73. [PubMed]
9. Cowland JB, Hother C, Gronbaek K. MicroRNAs and cancer. Apmis. 2007;115(10):1090–106. [PubMed]
10. Xi Y, Edwards JR, Ju J. Investigation of miRNA Biology by Bioinformatic Tools and Impact of miRNAs in Colorectal Cancer-Regulatory Relationship of c-Myc and p53 with miRNAs. Cancer Inform. 2007;3:245–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Calin GA, et al. Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(9):2999–3004. [PubMed]
12. Huppi K, et al. MicroRNAs and genomic instability. Semin Cancer Biol. 2007;17(1):65–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Wu W, et al. MicroRNA and cancer: Current status and prospective. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(5):953–60. [PubMed]
14. Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(11):857–66. [PubMed]
15. Tagawa H, et al. Synergistic action of the microRNA-17 polycistron and Myc in aggressive cancer development. Cancer Sci. 2007;98(9):1482–90. [PubMed]
16. Si ML, et al. miR-21-mediated tumor growth. Oncogene. 2007;26(19):2799–803. [PubMed]
17. Voorhoeve PM, et al. A genetic screen implicates miRNA-372 and miRNA-373 as oncogenes in testicular germ cell tumors. Cell. 2006;124(6):1169–81. [PubMed]
18. Chang TC, et al. Widespread microRNA repression by Myc contributes to tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2008;40(1):43–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Lee DY, et al. MicroRNA-378 promotes cell survival, tumor growth, and angiogenesis by targeting SuFu and Fus-1 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(51):20350–5. [PubMed]
20. Zhang L, et al. microRNAs exhibit high frequency genomic alterations in human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(24):9136–41. [PubMed]
21. Calin GA, et al. A MicroRNA signature associated with prognosis and progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1793–801. [PubMed]
22. Saito Y, et al. Specific activation of microRNA-127 with downregulation of the proto-oncogene BCL6 by chromatin-modifying drugs in human cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2006;9(6):435–43. [PubMed]
23. Lujambio A, et al. Genetic unmasking of an epigenetically silenced microRNA in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67(4):1424–9. [PubMed]
24. Thomson JM, et al. Extensive post-transcriptional regulation of microRNAs and its implications for cancer. Genes Dev. 2006;20(16):2202–7. [PubMed]
25. Sempere LF, et al. Altered MicroRNA expression confined to specific epithelial cell subpopulations in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67(24):11612–20. [PubMed]
26. Mi S, et al. MicroRNA expression signatures accurately discriminate acute lymphoblastic leukemia from acute myeloid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(50):19971–6. [PubMed]
27. Blenkiron C, Miska EA. miRNAs in cancer: approaches, aetiology, diagnostics and therapy. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16 Spec No 1:R106–13. [PubMed]
28. Calin GA, et al. Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro- RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(24):15524–9. [PubMed]
29. Ambs S, et al. Genomic profiling of microRNA and messenger RNA reveals deregulated microRNA expression in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68(15):6162–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Ozen M, et al. Widespread deregulation of microRNA expression in human prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27(12):1788–93. [PubMed]
31. Porkka KP, et al. MicroRNA expression profiling in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67(13):6130–5. [PubMed]
32. Volinia S, et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(7):2257–61. [PubMed]
33. Shi XB, et al. Molecular alterations associated with LNCaP cell progression to androgen independence. Prostate. 2004;60(3):257–71. [PubMed]
34. Shi XB, et al. An androgen-regulated miRNA suppresses Bak1 expression and induces androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(50):19983–8. [PubMed]
35. Griffiths-Jones S, et al. miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D140–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. John B, et al. Human MicroRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 2004;2(11):e363. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Mitchell PS, et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(30):10513–8. [PubMed]
38. Chen Stephen SC, Shing Tristan KF, Hung Emily CW, Tak-yeung, Lau Tze-kin, Chiu Rossa WK, Lo YM Dennis. Detection and Characterization of Placental MicroRNAs in Maternal Plasma. Clinical Chemistry. 2008;54(3):482–490. [PubMed]