(1) The Amygdala: An Emotional Processing Bias Patients with MDD have repeatedly demonstrated increased amygdala reactivity to negative stimuli as evinced by functional MRI (fMRI) (). (
Siegle et al., 2002) found that amygdalar responses to negative words were no longer visible after 10 seconds in healthy controls but persisted in depressed patients for a mean of 25 seconds. Similarly, depressed individuals reportedly remember negative words better than positive words (
Watkins et al., 1992), a finding that correlates with increased BOLD activity of the right amygdala (
Hamilton and Gotlib, 2008). Increased activity of the amygdala is also seen in conjunction with the expectation of a negative stimulus. MDD patients who were receiving treatment with antidepressant medication (AD), and were cued to anticipate the arrival of disgusting pictures, displayed greater BOLD activation in a broad region which encompassed the dorsal amygdala and the sublenticular nucleus compared with healthy subjects (
Abler et al., 2007). In contrast, a group of MDD subjects, receiving AD were found not to differ from healthy control subjects when presented with sad or fearful faces (
Lawrence et al., 2004).
| Table 1Endophenotype 1. Amygdala Reactivity in Subjects with MDD. |
The amygdala-associated emotional processing bias appears to hold for stimuli presented below the threshold of conscious awareness. (
Sheline et al., 2001) reported that MDD patients displayed a greater BOLD response in the left but not right amygdala in response to masked fearful faces. Furthermore, this exaggerated response was no longer present after 8 weeks of treatment with sertraline. More recently, (
Dannlowski et al., 2007a) reported that a greater amygdala response to masked sad or angry faces, was found to coincide with an unconscious, negative judgment bias in a group of AD-treated MDD patients.
An insertion/deletion promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) has been shown to impact transcriptional activity, anxiety-related traits (
Lesch et al., 1996) (
Savitz and Ramesar, 2004), and resilience to adversity (
Caspi et al., 2003) (
Stein et al., 2008). Substantial evidence that altered transcriptional activity of the serotonin transporter also impacts intermediate brain phenotypes, including an MDD-associated negative processing bias, can be found in the literature.
In healthy volunteers, the short (
s) allele of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism has been associated with increased amygdala activation in response to negatively valenced faces or decreased amygdala activation in response to neutral stimuli (
Hariri et al., 2002) (
Canli et al., 2005b) (
Hariri et al., 2005) (
Heinz et al., 2005) (
Canli et al., 2008). Similar results have been reported using different paradigms such as emotionally-valenced pictures (
Heinz et al., 2007) (
Smolka et al., 2007), and public speaking (
Furmark et al., 2004). The impact of SLC6A4 genotype on amygdala function also appears to hold in stressed rhesus monkeys (
Kalin et al., 2008), phobia-prone individuals (
Bertolino et al., 2005), and patients with MDD (
Dannlowski et al., 2007b) (
Dannlowski et al., 2008). Furthermore, the
s allele has been associated with elevated baseline amygdala activity (
Rao et al., 2007) and reduced amygdala volume in healthy subjects (
Pezawas et al., 2005) (
Pezawas et al., 2008); although see (
Canli et al., 2005b) who argue that increased amygdala activation in response to negative stimuli is an artifact of decreased response to neutral stimuli in
s allele carriers.
One possibility is that these SLC6A4-amygdala associations are mediated by an attentional bias. (
Beevers et al., 2007) explored this hypothesis using a dot-probe task to measure reaction time to masked and unmasked words designed to elicit anxiety or dysphoria. Patients with various different mood disorders who carried the
s allele showed a greater bias towards anxious stimuli than
l/
l homozygotes. This result was replicated by (
Osinsky et al., 2008) who found that healthy
s allele carriers selectively shifted their attention towards pictures of spiders compared with their counerparts homozygous for the
l allele. In a similar vein, the
s allele has been associated with a stronger startle response to bursts of noise in healthy individuals (
Brocke et al., 2006).
The SLC6A4 gene promoter variant has also been shown to modulate neurophysiological response to aversive stimuli in regions of the brain that are directly or indirectly connected to the amygdala, namely the orbital prefrontal cortex (OFC), basal nucleus of the stria terminalus (BNST) (
Kalin et al., 2008), and the fusiform gyrus (
Surguladze et al., 2008).
On the other hand, (
Domschke et al., 2006), in a sample of patients with panic disorder, found that
s allele carriers showed greater amygdala response to happy faces compared with neutral cues. Similarly, a fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET study reported that during tryptophan depletion, MDD carriers of the s allele showed reduced glucose metabolism of the left amygdala compared with l/l homozygotes (
Neumeister et al., 2006b).(
Lee and Ham, 2008a) found that the 5-HTTLPR
l allele was associated with greater BOLD response to angry versus neutral faces in healthy individuals. (
Lau et al., 2009) reported that healthy adolescent carriers of the
s allele exhibited stronger amygdala responses to fearful faces but anxious or depressed patients homozygous for the
l allele had greater right, but not left amygdalar activity when exposed to fearful faces.
The serotonin 1A receptor which is coded for by the HTR1A gene, plays a critical role in serotonergic signaling and has been strongly implicated in MDD (
Savitz et al., 2009). (
Dannlowski et al., 2007b) reported that the G allele of a functional single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP rs6295) was associated with greater amygdala reactivity in response to emotionally-valenced faces in a MDD sample. Similarly, after correcting for the effects of SLC6A4 genotype, (
Fakra et al., 2009) found that the G allele of rs6295 was associated with strength of amygdala activation in response to threat-related stimuli and level of trait anxiety in healthy individuals.
The tryptophan hydroxylase-2 (TPH2) gene is another strong candidate for impacting amygdala function. Tryptophan hydroxylase-2 catalyses the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of neuronal serotonin. We are aware of 5 studies that have reported significant effects of the TPH2 rs4570625 SNP on amygdala function in the context of emotional processing (
Brown et al., 2005) (
Canli et al., 2005a) (
Canli et al., 2008) (
Furmark et al., 2008) (
Lee and Ham, 2008a). These studies have largely been carried out with healthy volunteers. (
Brown et al., 2005) reported that the T allele of rs4570625 was associated with greater amygdala response to angry or fearful faces while (
Canli et al., 2005a) found that the effect of the rs4570625 variant on amygdala function extended to both positively and negatively valenced stimuli. In a later study, (
Canli et al., 2008) reported an additive effect of the TPH2 and SLC6A4 genes on amygdala reactivity that was most robust for sad or fearful faces: carriers of the T and
s alleles displayed a 0.24% greater BOLD response in the amygdala than subjects who did not possess either a T or an
s allele. These data derive further support from a positron emission tomography (PET) study. (
Furmark et al., 2008) showed that the TPH2 G allele predicted a placebo-induced improvement in social anxiety that was associated with a reduction in amygdala activity. In contrast, (
Lee and Ham, 2008a) reported that individuals homozygous for the G allele of rs4570625 showed higher levels of amygdala activity in response to sad (but not angry) faces than their counterparts who did not carry the G allele.
Polymorphisms of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (
Montag et al., 2008), catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) (
Smolka et al., 2005) (
Smolka et al., 2007) (
Domschke et al., 2008), and monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) (
Lee and Ham, 2008b) genes have also been associated with degree of amygdala reactivity in healthy controls and different patient groups. Further, a 4-marker haplotype of the regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2) gene was found to correlate with both self-reported levels of introversion and amygdala reactivity to emotionally-valenced faces (
Smoller et al., 2008).
The negative processing bias seen in MDD may be reversed by antidepressant (AD) treatment. (
Sheline et al., 2001) showed that the elevated BOLD response seen in the left amygdala of depressed patients in response to masked fearful faces was reduced by sertraline. This finding has received support from more recent studies (
Fu et al., 2004) (
Chen et al., 2007b). Moreover, the ADs, citalopram (
Harmer et al., 2006), reboxetine (
Norbury et al., 2007), and escitalopram (
Arce et al., 2008) have been reported to attenuate neural response of the amygdala to negatively valenced faces in healthy individuals. (
Fu et al., 2008) showed that the increased BOLD activity in the right amydala-hippocampus region observed in their sample of patients with MDD was normalized following cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT). Nevertheless, 2 previous PET studies making use of interpersonal therapy and CBT, respectively, were unable to detect any changes in the glucose metabolic rate of the amygdala (
Brody et al., 2001) (
Goldapple et al., 2004).
The positive impact of AD treatment on amygdala reactivity raises the question of whether the MDD-associated emotional processing bias is only seen in the acute stage of depression or is a permanent trait. This is an important issue because a true endophenotype should be mood-independent (
Gottesman and Gould, 2003).
A number of studies suggest that amygdala activation is a mood-congruent, temporally-limited phenomenon. Transient sadness concomitant with amygdala activation has been induced by sad facial expressions (
Schneider et al., 1997) (
Posse et al., 2003) (
Habel et al., 2005), movie clips (
Aalto et al., 2002) (
Wang et al., 2006), and recall of negative life events (
George et al., 1995). In fact, it is known that direct electrical stimulation of the amygdala in humans may temporarily elicit positive and especially, negative emotions (
Gloor et al., 1982) (
Lanteaume et al., 2007).
On the other hand, at least 2 studies have suggested that increased amygdala reactivity is salient early in life in humans and monkeys with an anxious temperament. (
Fox et al., 2008) showed that rhesus monkeys with an anxious disposition showed increased glucose metabolism (measured with PET FDG) of the amygdala and a downstream circuit, including the BNST and PAG. This echoes the result of a longitudinal study in humans demonstrating that infants classified as “inhibited” displayed a greater BOLD response in the amygdala when viewing novel faces as adults than their counterparts who were classified as “uninhibited” infants (
Schwartz et al., 2003).
Consistent with these data, (
Neumeister et al., 2006a) reported increased blood flow to the amygdala, as measured by O
15 H
2O PET in unmedicated,
remitted MDD patients. Further, we have recently found that currently remitted MDD patients show a
reduced hemodynamic response to masked
happy faces compared with healthy controls (
Ferguson et al., 2008). The issue of facial masking may be relevant to the endophenotypic criterion of heritability.
A number of studies have provided evidence that greater amygdala activation to negatively-valenced faces is characteristic of MDD even when these stimuli are masked, and no conscious processing of the faces is possible (
Sheline et al., 2001) (
Dannlowski et al., 2007a). Certainly, this does not prove that MDD-associated hyper-reactivity to socio-emotional stimuli is heritable, but the automatic, limbic system-mediated nature of the phenomena does raise the possibility that genetic factors at play.
To the best of our knowledge, only one study has examined facial processing biases in a high-risk sample. (
Monk et al., 2008) reported that the pediatric offspring of parents with MDD showed a greater amygdala response to passively-viewed fearful faces than their healthy counterparts with no family history of affective illness. Nevertheless, more than half of the high-risk group had been diagnosed with an anxiety disorder, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn from the study.
Other studies shed partial light on the issue of state versus trait. Trait anxiety as measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was found to correlate (r=0.74) significantly with basolateral amygdala activity in response to masked fearful faces in healthy volunteers (
Etkin et al., 2004). Analogous findings have since been reported (
Stein et al., 2007) (
Dickie and Armony, 2008). In a similar vein, healthy individuals have demonstrated long-term (1–2 years) stability of right amygdala BOLD responses to angry faces (
Manuck et al., 2007). (
van der Veen et al., 2007) reported that healthy individuals with a family history of MDD showed a lowering of mood together with greater amygdala activation in response to fearful faces after tryptophan depletion. A latent emotional processing bias in high-risk individuals may thus be precipitated by some kind of “insult”, whether pharmacological or environmental.
In sum, greater amygdala reactivity in response to negatively valenced cues appears to be at least partly mood-state independent. Extant data suggest that the
s allele of the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR variant contributes to this “risk” phenotype. Nevertheless, not all studies are consistent (
Domschke et al., 2006) (
Lee and Ham, 2008a) (
Lau et al., 2009).
Despite the apparent early onset of exaggerated amygdala reactivity, the status of the emotional-processing bias phenotype as an endophenotype for MDD remains unclear given the attenuating effects of AD medication and the dearth of family studies.
(2) Hippocampal Volume Loss in MDD Hippocampal volume reduction is a common finding in patients with MDD (
Sheline et al., 1996) (
Sheline et al., 1999) (
Mervaala et al., 2000) (
MacQueen et al., 2003) (
Janssen et al., 2004) (
Lloyd et al., 2004) (
O’Brien et al., 2004) (
Hickie et al., 2005) (
Neumeister et al., 2005) (
Frodl et al., 2006) (
Janssen et al., 2007) (
Macmaster et al., 2007) (
Ballmaier et al., 2007) (). These data are supported by recent longitudinal studies. MDD patients with smaller hippocampal volumes are reportedly less likely to remit after a 1 year follow-up (
Frodl et al., 2004a). A 3-year follow-up by the same group showed a greater decrease in hippocampal volumes over time in the MDD group (
Frodl et al., 2008b). Similarly, (
Kronmuller et al., 2008) reported that male patients who relapsed within a 2 year follow-up period displayed smaller hippocampal volumes than healthy controls. Congruent with these data, a 36% increase in hippocampal neuronal density together with a 20% reduction in neuronal size, indicative of neuropil loss, has been detected at post-mortem (
Stockmeier et al., 2004).
| Table 2Endophenotype 2. Hippocampal Volume Reduction. |
(
Pezawas et al., 2004) showed that the
met allele of a common functional SNP (val66met) in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene was associated with smaller hippocampal volumes in a healthy sample, and similar effect has since been noted in both healthy subjects and individuals with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (BD) (
Szeszko et al., 2005) (
Bueller et al., 2006) (
Ho et al., 2006) (
Takahashi et al., 2008) (
Chepenik et al., 2009). According to a recent study, the association between the
met allele and reduced hippocampal volume may be more salient in healthy people exposed to early life stress (
Gatt et al., 2009) and healthy subjects with higher levels neuroticism as measured by the NEO-Five Factor Personality Inventory, and trait depression as measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-42) (
Joffe et al., 2008). To our knowledge, only one study has examined the effect of the val66met SNP on hippocampal volume in MDD: (
Frodl et al., 2007) found smaller hippocampal volumes in both controls and acutely ill, medicated MDD patients carrying the
met allele.
The SLC6A4 gene has also been postulated to modulate the association between MDD and hippocampal volume. (
Frodl et al., 2004b) (
Frodl et al., 2008a) found that
l allele MDD homozygotes had smaller hippocampal volumes than
s allele carriers with MDD. (
Taylor et al., 2005a) noted that in patients with late onset depression (> 50 years),
l allele homozygotes displayed smaller right hippocampal volumes, but in MDD patients with early illness-onset (< 50 years), the
s allele homozygotes had smaller hippocampal volumes. Further, the
s allele has been reported to be associated with lower hippocampal concentrations of N-acetylaspartate (NAA), a neuronal and axonal marker of damage to the brain (
Gallinat et al., 2005).
Although hippocampal volume decrements are widely reported in MDD the data are contradictory. For negative results see (
Axelson et al., 1993) (
Pantel et al., 1997) (
Ashtari et al., 1999) (
Vakili et al., 2000) (
von Gunten et al., 2000) (
Rusch et al., 2001) (
Hastings et al., 2004) (
Inagaki et al., 2004) (
Rydmark et al., 2006). One hypothesis is that hippocampal atrophy is more pronounced in elderly, middle-aged or chronically ill populations. A hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis-driven excitotoxic process is one heuristic model of hippocampal volume loss and associated MDD that is consistent with the impact of age and length of illness. Since, at least in rodents, the hippocampus is believed to exert inhibitory control over the amygdala and HPA axis (
Jacobson and Sapolsky, 1991) (
Barden, 2004), hippocampal tissue loss may activate a positive feedback loop which further potentiates the release of cortisol and hippocampal excitotoxicity.
If neurophysiological changes to the hippocampus are indeed stress-related, then this limits the utility of this imaging trait as an endophenotype. Clearly, HPA-induced hippocampal atrophy may be a latent predisposition which manifests itself only under particular environmental conditions. As such, it will not readily identify people at risk for future depressive episodes precipitated by situational adversity. Nevertheless, interrogation of the genetic correlates of hippocampal volume reduction in acutely ill patients remains valuable. For example, the association between hippocampal volume and the BDNF val66met polymorphism is intuitively compelling based on animal data showing decreased expression of BDNF in the hippocampus after exposure to corticosteroids or stressors (
Gronli et al., 2006) (
Jacobsen and Mork, 2006) (
Tsankova et al., 2006) (
Xu et al., 2006).
(4). Stuctural and Functional Alterations of the Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex (sgACC) The term sgACC was originally used to refer to Brodmann areas (BA) 24b and, to a lesser extent, 24a anteriorly, and BA25 posteriorly (
Ongur et al., 2003). This region was initially shown by (
Drevets et al., 1997b) to display an MDD-associated reduction in blood flow and glucose metabolism, with a corresponding reduction in GM volume of the left sgACC. Later, we refined our anatomical characterization of the region, separating the sgACC into cytoarchitectonically distinct anterior and posterior components, which correspond approximately to BA 24 and 25, respectively (
Ongur et al., 2003).
Since our initial report, reduced sgACC volume has been independently reported [reviewed in (
Drevets et al., 2008)] (). (
Botteron et al., 2002) observed reduced left sgACC volumes in an early-onset sample of largely unmedicated MDD cases, while (
Hastings et al., 2004) detected a similar effect in males but not females. A sex-specific effect was also reported by (
Boes et al., 2008) who found volume reductions of the broader left perigenual ACC in boys but not girls with subclinical depression.
| Table 4Endophenotype 4. Volumetric Abnormalities of the sgACC in MDD. |
The posterior sgACC (infralimbic cortex or BA 25) was found to be reduced in volume in MDD cases with psychotic features, but not in a psychiatric control group with schizophrenia (
Coryell et al., 2005). Furthermore, the MDD group showed an increase in posterior sgACC GM volume after 2 years of naturalistic treatment. Consistent with this finding, chronic lithium treatment, which exerts neurotrophic effects in animal models, has been associated with a recovery of GM volume of the sgACC in treatment responders (
Moore, 2008). (
Yucel et al., 2008) also reported a decrease in volume of the infralimbic cortex in a MDD sample treated for an average of one month with AD prior to scanning. There was no significant difference in sgACC (BA 24) volume between the MDD and its healthy comparison group. However, when the MDD group was stratified by AD exposure, it was found that the AD-exposed MDD patients had smaller sgACC volumes than both healthy subjects and their drug-naïve counterparts with MDD (
Yucel et al., 2008).
The imaging data are supported by a histopathological analysis of BA 24, which suggested that the volume reduction seen on MRI was associated with a reduction in neuropil (
Ongur et al., 1998).
Imaging studies that assessed sgACC activity in designs that controlled for partial volume effects, are indicative of increased resting glucose metabolism or BOLD activity in the sgACC and infralimbic cortex of depressed patients (
Inagaki et al., 2007) (
Kumano et al., 2007) (
Mah et al., 2007) (). In addition, (
Greicius et al., 2007) conducted a resting-state connectivity analysis of persons with MDD and interpret their data to suggest that the altered pattern of resting state connectivity in MDD is driven primarily by elevated activity of the sgACC. In line with these data, sgACC metabolism and cerebral blood flow (CBF) are higher in the depressed, unmedicated phase versus the remitted phase within MDD subjects (
Mayberg et al., 1999) (
Drevets et al., 2002) (
Neumeister et al., 2004) (
Hasler et al., 2008). Elevated sgACC BOLD activity has also been observed in MDD patients performing the stop-signal test (
Yang et al., 2009) and an emotional interference task (
Fales et al., 2008).
| Table 5Endophenotype 4. Neurophysiological Abnormalities of the sgACC. |
The impact of increased neural activity on brain structure is not fully understood. One possibility is stress-induced dendritic remodeling, observed as increases or decreases in GM volume on MRI scans. Glucocorticoid hormones, which are thought to be over-secreted in MDD and other stress-related conditions, regulate glutamate release through the inhibition of glutamate transporter expression, the upregulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor subunit expression, and the activation of voltage-gated sodium channels, thereby modulating intracellular calcium influx (
McEwen and Magarinos, 2001) (
Lee et al., 2002). Since glucose metabolism is primarily reflective of the level of glutamatergic transmission in the brain (
Patel et al., 2004) (
Shulman et al., 2004), increased glucose metabolism may explain the decreased sgACC GM volume reported in MDD.
We are aware of 2 studies that investigated the effects of the 5-HTTLPR variant on perigenual ACC volume in healthy subjects. (
Canli et al., 2005b) found that the
s allele was associated with reduced left middle frontal gyral (BA 9: −27; 31; 46) and pregenual ACC (−10; 35; 17) volume; while (
Pezawas et al., 2005) reported an
s-allele associated volume reduction of the subgenual (−3; 33; −2) and pregenual (reported as “supragenual” 0; 30; 4 and 0; 35; 13) ACC. Short allele carriers also show reduced structural covariation between the amygdala and perigenual ACC, suggestive of attenuated functional coupling between these two regions (
Pezawas et al., 2005). The association between reduced volume of BA 9 and the short 5-HTTLPR allele (
Canli et al., 2005b) is interesting because glial cell loss and a reduction in neuronal size at post-mortem has also been reported in this region in MDD (
Rajkowska et al., 1999).
Consistent with observations that experimentally-induced sadness increases blood-flow to the sgACC (
George et al., 1995) (
Mayberg et al., 1999), the severity of depressive symptomatology in MDD and BD subjects was shown by (
Osuch et al., 2000) to be correlated with glucose metabolism of this region. Moreover, various treatment paradigms including antidepressant treatment (
Mayberg et al., 2000) (
Holthoff et al., 2004), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (
Nobler et al., 2001), and deep brain stimulation of the sgACC (
Mayberg et al., 2005) result in decreased activity of the sgACC. On the other hand, (
Drevets et al., 1997b) found that altered sgACC glucose metabolism persisted during antidepressant drug treatment and was present in both the manic and depressed phases of BD.
State-trait issues have received less attention in the structural imaging literature, and most studies have imaged currently depressed patients. One recent study showed that response to lithium treatment was associated with a recovery of GM volume of the sgACC of individuals with BD (
Moore, 2008), and another found initial and progressive loss of GM volume in BD subjects, most of whom were not receiving lithium (
Koo et al., 2008).
Studies of individuals who are at high familial risk for developing mood disorders are unfortunately rare. (
Boes et al., 2008) found that the left perigenual ACC volume was smaller in boys with sub-clinical depression, and that the negative correlation between left sgACC volume and depression symptoms was strongest in boys with a family history of depression. Similarly reduced sgACC volumes have been reported in the unaffected relatives of patients with bipolar disorder (
McDonald et al., 2004). In a recent fMRI study, (
Mannie et al., 2008) found that children of parents with MDD showed an absence of activation in the pregenual ACC in response to emotionally valenced stimuli (emotional Stroop) compared with their control group. How these data related to the structural MRI findings are unclear.
(5). Disrupted Fronto-Limbic Connectivity A heuristic model of MDD is a loss of top-down, PFC control over limbic regions such as the amygdala, leading to the emotional, behavioral, cognitive and endocrine changes characteristic of the disorder (
Savitz and Drevets, 2009). Partly consistent with this model, reduced fronto-limbic connectivity (measured by the degree of temporal correlation in activity across different brain regions) has been consistently reported in the fMRI literature (). What is less clear, however, is the specific region of the PFC that is functionally-decoupled from the amygdala.
| Table 6Endophenotype 5. Impaired Fronto-Limbic Connectivity in MDD. |
(
Anand et al., 2005a) reported a decreased correlation between activity in the broader ACC and the amygdala in both the resting state and during exposure to neutral, negative and positively valenced pictures in their MDD sample. After 6 weeks of treatment with sertraline, the same MDD sample displayed an increase in ACC-limbic connectivity in the resting state and during exposure to neutral and positive, but not negative pictures (
Anand et al., 2005b). Similarly, (
Chen et al., 2008) found that the reduced functional coupling of the medial and ventral PFC with the amygdala observed in their MDD sample during exposure to sad faces, was ameliorated by 8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine.
(
Siegle et al., 2007) reported that MDD subjects demonstrated greater activation of the amygdala in response to affectively-valenced words, and reduced activity of the left DLPFC during a working memory task than healthy control subjects. Further, the temporal association between DLPFC and amygdala activity was reduced in the MDD sample compared with the healthy control sample. These data are consistent with the results of a previous study reporting an inverse correlation between amygdala and DLPFC activation in response to the presentation of negatively valenced words (
Siegle et al., 2002). Most recently, a functional correlation between activity in the amygdala and three PFC regions, the DLPFC, the dACC, and the ventrolateral PFC (vlPFC), was shown to be reduced in individuals with MDD (
Dannlowski et al., 2009).
The vlPFC was also implicated by (
Johnstone et al., 2007) who reported an inverse relationship between left vlPFC and amygdala activation in healthy controls but the opposite effect in MDD cases. (
Johnstone et al., 2007) attribute this vlPFC-amygdala disconnect to dysfunction of the ventromedial PFC (vmPFC) which serves as an inhibitory link between the lateral PFC and the amygdala. (
Matthews et al., 2008) reported
increased functional connectivity between the broader amygdala region and the sgACC but decreased functional connectivity between the extended amygdala and the supragenual ACC in response to the presentation of emotional faces.
Anxiety may be an important confounding factor. (
Kienast et al., 2008) reported a negative correlation between trait anxiety in healthy males and the degree of functional connectivity between the sgACC (BA24) and the amygdala in response to negatively-valenced visual stimuli. In addition, degree of habituation to emotional go-no-go stimuli has been reported to be negatively correlated with functional connectivity of the ventral PFC and the amygdala in healthy controls with higher levels of self-reported anxiety (
Hare et al., 2008).
The genetic basis of this abnormal PFC-limbic functional coupling is in the early stage of investigation. (
Pezawas et al., 2005) found that the
s allele of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism was associated with reduced functional coupling between the supragenual ACC, but increased functional coupling between the vmPFC and the amygdala in healthy controls exposed to threatening faces. Additionally, the degree of functional coupling between the perigenual ACC and the amygdala predicted approximately 30% of the variance in scores on the harm avoidance subscale of the Temperament and Personality Questionnaire (
Pezawas et al., 2005). The greater vmACC-amygdala coupling observed in
s 5-HTTLPR allele carriers replicated the finding of (
Heinz et al., 2005) who observed a similar effect in healthy volunteers shown aversive pictures.
(
Dannlowski et al., 2009) reported that the inverse functional correlation between dACC and amygdala activity observed in their healthy control sample, was attenuated in carriers of the high activity monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) promoter polymorphism alleles (3.5R or 4R). Further, MDD cases with the high activity MAOA variants showed the weakest amygdala-dACC coupling and the most severe course of illness. (
Buckholtz et al., 2008) had earlier reported increased vmPFC-amygdala coupling in healthy male carriers of the low activity MAOA VNTR alleles, an effect which predicted higher harm avoidance personality scores in this sample.
In sum, the extant data suggest that a functional decoupling exists within the neural circuits connecting PFC and amygdala areas that are involved in the cognitive control of emotions in MDD. The anatomical correlates of these neural circuits are not entirely clear but may include both dorsomedial, ventromedial and dorsolateral aspects of the PFC. Conversely there is some evidence for enhanced functional connectivity between the amygdala and the vmPFC in MDD. Given reports of an AD-induced strengthening in PFC-limbic coupling (
Anand et al., 2005b) (
Chen et al., 2008), the utility of this trait as a biomarker for the efficacy of AD-treatment is deserving of greater exploration.