PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Lipids. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 August 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2760058
NIHMSID: NIHMS124289

The HMG-CoA reductase gene and lipid and lipoprotein levels: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Abstract

HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) is an enzyme involved in cholesterol synthesis. To investigate the contribution of the HMGCR gene to lipids and lipoprotein subfraction in different ethnicities, we performed an association study in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Totally, 2444 MESA subjects (597 African-Americans (AA), 627 Chinese-Americans (CHA), 612 European-Americans (EA), and 608 Hispanic-Americans (HA)) without statin use were included. Participants had measurements of blood pressure, anthropometry, and fasting blood samples. Subjects were genotyped for 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). After excluding SNPs with minor allele frequency <5%, a single block was constructed. The most frequent haplotype was H1 (41-56%) in all ethnic groups except AA (H2a, 44.9%). Lower triglyceride level was associated with the H2a haplotype in AA and H2 in HA. In HA, H4 carriers had higher levels of triglyceride and small low-density lipoprotein (s-LDL), and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), while carriers with H7 or H8 had associations with these traits in the opposite direction. No significant association was discovered in both CHA and EA. The total variation for triglyceride that could be explained by H2 alone was 2.6% in HA and 1.4% in AA. In conclusion, HMGCR gene variation is associated with multiple lipid/lipoprotein traits, especially with triglyceride, s-LDL, and HDL-c. The impact of the genetic variance is modest and differs greatly between ethnicities.

Keywords: hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA reductases, association study, cholesterol, triglyceride, low density lipoprotein size

Introduction

Elevated triglyceride (TG), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), and elevated small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles (s-LDL) have been established as important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [1]. Several studies have revealed ethnic difference in the variation in lipid/lipoprotein traits [2, 3]. Compared to other ethnic groups, despite a higher prevalence of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and obesity, the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-c is lower in blacks [2-4]. In contrast, Asians had higher TG and lower HDL-c than whites despite the lower body mass index (BMI) [5]. The interethnic disparity in lipid/lipoprotein profile could not be solely explained by the differences in environmental or nutritional factors [2].

Genetic effects on lipid/lipoprotein phenotypes have been shown in numerous studies. Atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype was demonstrated to segregate in Caucasian families [6], and heritability of LDL particles was estimated to range from 0.34 to 0.60 in Caucasian and Hispanic families [7-10]. Linkage studies have reported several chromosome loci with lipid/lipoprotein traits in multiple ethnicities [11-15]. Two independent groups [11, 15] have reported a promising locus on 5q13-14, which suggests as a potential candidate gene, the HMG-CoA reductase gene (HMGCR). This locus was linked to TG and total cholesterol (TC) levels in Turkish/Mediterranean families [15], and to LDL peak particle diameter and TG levels in Quebec families [11].

HMGCR is the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis and is the target of statin therapy [16]. Pharmacokinetic studies have identified interethnic differences in the statin responses [17, 18]. Previous studies [19, 20] have shown that the HMGCR gene contributed to the difference in response to statin. A major role of HMGCR alternative splicing in influencing lipids response to statin therapy [21] and LDL-c variation [22] has been shown in the previous reports. Although the HMGCR gene was associated with the baseline LDL-c, it has not been clarified to what extent HMGCR gene contributes to lipids and lipoprotein subfraction in multiple ethnic groups. To investigate the contribution of the HMGCR gene to the lipid/lipoprotein traits in different ethnicities, we utilized the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis study (MESA) to test the association between the HMGCR gene and a comprehensive profile of lipid and lipoprotein subfration in AA (African-Americans), CHA (Chinese-Americans), EA (European-Americans), and HA (Hispanic-Americans). We used a tagged single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) approach to comprehensively assess gene variation.

Methods

Subjects

MESA is a prospective cohort study designed to study the progression of subclinical cardiovascular disease, consisting of 6814 subjects who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease at entry. The participants were recruited from six communities (Baltimore, Chicago, Forsyth County, Los Angeles County, Northern Manhattan, and St. Paul). The sampling procedures have been described in detail [23] and are available at www.mesa-nhlbi.org. A subcohort of 2880 MESA subjects (720 in each ethnic group with matched age and gender) were randomly selected from subjects who gave informed consent for genetic studies. After excluding subjects with statin use, we included 2444 subjects in the current study (597 AA, 627 CHA, 612 EA, and 608 HA).

Phenotyping

All data were collected at the first MESA examination (2000-2002), when participants had measurements of blood pressure (BP), anthropometry, and fasting blood samples. Three resting BP readings were recorded, and hypertension was defined as a mean systolic BP ≥140 or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medication. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was defined as a fasting glucose >6.88 mmol/L or use of antidiabetic medication.

Using CDC-standardized methods, lipid levels were measured on samples obtained after an overnight fast. LDL-c was calculated in plasma specimens having a TG value <400 mg/dL by the Friedewald equation. Measurements for lipoprotein particles have been previously described [24].

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral leukocytes isolated from packed cells of anticoagulated blood by use of a commercially available DNA isolation kit (Puregene; Gentra Systems, Minneapolis). The DNA was quantified by determination of absorbance at 260 nm followed by PicoGreen analysis (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene).

Because of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the human genome, genotyping chosen SNPs will provide sufficient information to assess the remainder of the common SNPs and to construct each of the common haplotypes in specific region [25]. Using International HapMap data on NCBI Build 35 assembly for whites, Asian, and Yoruban populations, we selected 10 SNPs to tag major haplotypes by Haploview v4 [26]. Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (tagSNPs) in candidate gene loci were according to the following criteria: (1) within the proximal and distal 10 k base regions 5’ and 3’ to the given candidate gene (NCBI Build 35); (2) compatibility with the Illumina GoldenGate technology [27, 28] as determined by the Assay Design Tool (TechSupport, Illumina, San Diego, CA); (3) minor allele frequency (MAF) >0.05 or a tag (r2 value >0.8) for another SNP with MAF >0.05 as determined by applying the multilocus or “aggressive” “Tagger” option of Haploview v3 [26, 29] using International HapMap project data for CEPH and Yoruban populations (release 19), (International HapMap Consortium 2003). All the ten SNPs were used for haplotyping, except for the SNP rs5908, since its MAF was <0.05 in all MESA ethnic groups, and thus providing little information in association study. The 10 SNPs were rs3761738 (G/A, mRNA untranslated region, UTR), rs3761739 (G/A, UTR), rs4704209 (A/G, intron), rs10038095 (A/T, intron), rs2303152 (G/A, intron), rs3846662 (G/A, intron), rs5908 (reference allele A/G, I637V), rs17238540 (A/C, intron), rs3846663 (G/A, intron), and rs5909 (G/A, UTR). As is well-known, G/A is the most common change in the human genome due to a methylation of the C on the opposite strand followed by deamination to a T. Although the MAF of the SNP rs5908 in CEPH shown in the International HapMap was 0.34, which is borderline lower that 0.05 it was still considered to be genotyped in this study because of its function of a non-synonymous polymorphism (reference allele A, I637V). Genotyping was performed by Illumina genotyping services (Illumina Inc., San Diego, GoldenGate assay). All 10 SNPs were successfully typed with a genotype calling rate of 100%. Each SNP was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE, significance level of 0.005) in each ethnic group. We utilized the SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥0.05 to evaluate LD in each ethnic group and in the combined group by Haploview v4 [26]. Because the MAF of rs5908 was <0.05 in all ethnic groups, it was not included in haplotype construction. In each ethnic group, there was a single block structure, composed of a portion of the remaining 9 SNPs. Because the MAF was different for each SNP between ethnicities, different ethnic groups had different portions of the 9 SNPs for the same haplotype (Appendix 1). For example, the H2 haplotype was separated into H2a and H2b in AA based on the variation of rs17238540, in which the MAF was 0.08 in AA but <0.05 in the others. Haplotypes were reconstructed based on the LD results in each ethnic group by PHASE 2.0 [30]. Haplotypes with frequency <1% were excluded, and were numbered in the order of their frequency in the combined sample.

Appendix 1
Haplotype structure and frequencies of the HMGCR gene in each MESA ethnic group

Statistical Analysis

Interethnic differences of the demographic/phenotypic characteristics and haplotypes distribution were performed by ANOVA or the Pearson’s χ2-test where appropriate. We used haplotypes to examine the possible associations because it is expected that haplotype analyses will provide greater power than single SNPs since certain untyped SNPs may be in LD with a combination of typed SNPs [31]. Association tests for individual SNPs were only applied to those which differentiate the haplotypes with significant association results. We use general linear model (GLM) to estimate association in each ethnic group. Covariates included age, gender, BMI, and DM. Dominant models for SNP analyses were used because the majority of the SNPs had minor allele homozygotes <10. Parameter estimates were derived from the same models. Permutation testing of 10,000 replicates was performed for empirical estimates to account for the multiple testing. To identify the interaction between significant haplotypes and ethnic groups, the multiplicative term of significant haplotypes and ethnic groups was examined by the GLM. R squared was calculated to estimate the proportion of explained variation of the outcome variable as a function of independence in the GLM.

Under the sample of 600 independent individuals and a priori TC data in MESA, we tested the ability to detect an association between a SNP and TC. At 0.005 significance level, for detectable effect size >0.4, we had sufficient power (>0.80) to identify the association under a dominant model with disease allele frequency >0.10.

Results

Except for age and gender, the prevalence of DM and hypertension, and the quantitative traits of BMI, waist circumference, and lipid/lipoprotein levels, significantly differed between ethnicities (Table 1). The prevalence of hypertension was higher in AA (52%) than the others (35-40%). BMI and waist circumference were higher in AA and HA, and lower in CHA. Compared to the other groups, AA had a more protective lipid/lipoprotein phenotype.

Table 1
Mean Values with Standard Deviations or Percentage Distributions of Clinical, Lipid, and Lipoprotein Variables in each MESA Ethnic Group

Haplotype structure and frequencies of the HMGCR gene in each ethnic group are shown in Table 2 and Appendix 1. The frequency of each haplotype differed significantly between ethnic groups (χ2-test, p<0.0001). The H1 haplotype was the most frequent haplotype in every ethnic group except AA, in which 44.9% had H2a.

Table 2
Haplotype Frequencies of the HMGCR Gene in each MESA Ethnic Group

There was no significant association between any of the lipids traits and the HMGCR gene in both EA and CHA. However, lower TG was associated with H2a in AA (p=0.005) and H2 in HA (p=0.021) (Table 3). TG/HDL-c ratio was also lower in the H2a carriers in AA (p=0.023). In HA, the H4 haplotype was associated with the lipid/lipoprotein traits, specifically, higher TG (p=0.012), TG/HDL-c ratio (p=0.003), s-LDL (p=0.016), l-VLDL (p=0.012), m-VLDL (p=0.002), and lower HDL-c (p=0.004) and l-HDL(p=0.0004) (Fig. 1); in contrast, H8 was associated with these traits in the opposite direction, including lower TG (p=0.002), TG/HDL-c ratio (p=0.0005), s-LDL (p=0.009), l-VLDL (p=0.021), s-VLDL (p=0.039), and higher HDL-c (p=0.002) and l-HDL (p=0.002). In HA, the H7 haplotype was also associated with lower TG (p=0.013), lower TG/HDL-c ratio (p=0.032), and lower s-VLDL (p= 0.017), but to a lesser magnitude compared with H8; in addition, H7 was associated with lower TC (p=0.026) and m-VLDL (p=0.012), but not significantly associated with the subclasses of LDL and HDL. LDL-c was not associated with any of the examined haplotypes in any ethnic group. In HA, when combining the subjects carrying H7 or H8, carriers had lower TC (p=0.04), lower TG (p<0.0001), higher HDL-c (p=0.01), lower l-VLDL (p=0.003), and higher l-HDL (p=0.001) than non-carriers (Fig. 1), and had lower TC (p=0.03), TG (p<0.0001), s-LDL (p=0.02), l-VLDL (p=0.0004), and higher HDL-c (p=0.003) and l-HDL (p=0.0003) levels than the H4 carriers.

Figure 1
Comparisons of lipid/lipoprotein levels between the carriers and non-carriers of the HMGCR H4 and the combination of H7 and/or H8 in Hispanic-Americans
Table 3
Differences (95% confident interval) of lipid traits as a function of the presence or absence of HMGCR haplotypes in African-Americans (AA) and Hispanic Americans (HA) in MESA

Examination of the interaction effect of H2 and the ethnicity of AA and HA on TG levels was performed to determine if the higher frequency of H2 in AA could explain their lower TG levels. The H2 haplotype was associated with lower TG in both AA and HA. However, compared to HA, both H2 carriers and non-carriers in AA had lower TG level (Fig. 2). The difference in TG level between H2 carriers and non-carriers were similar in AA and HA (p=0.70). The interethnic difference in TG thus could not be solely explained by the H2 effect only. The total variation for TG that could be explained by H2 alone was 2.6% in HA and 1.4% in AA when controlling for covariates.

Figure 2
Triglyceride levels in H2 carriers and non-carriers in African-Americans (AA) and Hispanic-Americans (HA)

Associations were examined for the SNPs that differentiated significant haplotypes, including rs3846662 (separating H2a and H1), rs17238540 (H2a and H2b), and rs10038095 (H2a and H7) in AA, and rs3846662 (H2 and H1), rs3846663 (H7 and H3), rs3761739 (H8 and H3), and rs4704209 (H4 and H8) in HA. All the selected 3 SNPs in AA and rs3846662 and rs3761739 in HA showed no contribution toward the associations of the relevant haplotypes (data not shown). In contrast, the minor allele of rs3846663 was associated with higher TG (p=0.001), higher TG/HDL-c ratio (p=0.006), and higher m-VLDL (p=0.002) in HA, which was consistent with the association and the direction of H7. The association with rs4704209 was entirely equivalent to that with the H4 haplotype in HA.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first report regarding the interethnic differences in the distribution of HMGCR haplotypes and the differential associations of HMGCR gene with lipid/lipoprotein levels. The significant associations occurred mainly in HA. In HA, the H4 haplotype was associated with higher TG, s-LDL, VLDL and lower HDL-c, and the haplotypes H2, H7, and H8 were associated with lower TG, s-LDL, VLDL and higher HDL-c. The H2 haplotype was associated with lower TG and lower VLDL in AA as well. The absence of H2 in CHA and the lack of the distinct, separable H4 and H8 haplotypes in AA and EA could well have accounted for ethnic differences in the associations. In HA, SNP analyses suggested that the association of H7 and H4 could be attributed to rs3846663 and rs4704209, respectively (or any SNP in complete LD with the two SNPs). This study supports that AA have less proportion of hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-c than the other ethnic groups. Although AA had a remarkably high frequency (44.9%) of H2a, this study revealed that the HMGCR H2a haplotype had only a modest effect on TG level, and did not have significant effect on the interethnic difference of TG levels. In summary, the HMGCR gene variation is associated with multiple lipid/lipoprotein traits. The impact of the genetic variance is modest and differs greatly between ethnicities.

The first published MESA genetic study [32] utilized a MESA sample (n=969, white=448, Chinese =97, AA=205, HA:219) from the overall baseline MESA cohort who were randomly selected from the 5030 MESA participants enrolled prior to February 2002, before the completion of the overall recruitment. That study found ethnic differences regarding the association between ABCA1 gene SNPs and HDL-c as well as subclinical atherosclerosis. The multi-ethnic composition of the MESA cohort is both a strength (analyses in multiple ethnicities) and a potential limitation (relatively small sample sizes) [32].

The limitation of the present study included moderate sample sizes of each population group, which could limit the capacity to reveal valid genetic information for the complex phenotype of lipoprotein levels. Independent confirmation or further replication is needed to verify these associations. The other potential limitation of this study was that the LDL-c level was calculated by the Friedewald equation in stead of direct tests; therefore, LDL-c of subjects with TG value greater than 400 mg/dL was not included in the genetic analysis. However, there were only 1.4 % (34 subjects) with elevated TG were excluded from analyses. This study can not discover any association between HMGCR gene and lipids traits in EA and CHA. It is possible that lipids were associated with other SNPs and haplotypes in the HMGCR gene which have more potent associations with lipids/lipoproteins traits. In addition, the MESA subjects consisted of only subjects free from known cardiovascular diseases at baseline, and this study has excluded subjects who took statin; both of the above selection criteria may lead to somewhat different results. The strengths of this study included the multiple samples of different ethnicities, extensive LD mapping and haplotyping of the locus, comparisons of haplotype frequency and genetic associations across ethnic groups, and the consistent associations between lower triglyceride level and the HMGCR haplotype 2 in two ethnic groups, AA and HA.

The HMGCR gene map locus at 5q13.3-q14. Previous studies showed linkage evidence of this locus with several lipid/lipoprotein traits, mainly in whites [11, 15]. In AA, CHA, or HA, there was no promising data supporting this linkage [12-14]. In contrast to the linkage reports, the associations between HMGCR gene and the lipid/lipoprotein traits in our study were most striking in HA and AA, but not in EA. In EA, the absence of association between the HMGCR gene and lipid/lipoprotein traits was consistent with the finding in the previous studies [19, 20]. The Pravastatin Inflammation/CRP Evaluation (PRINCE) study and the Cholesterol and Pharmacogenetics (CAP) study have demonstrated that the HMGCR gene contributed to the difference in response to statin. [19, 20]. The PRINCE study did not find association between the HMGCR gene and the baseline LDL-c level in the studied population which consisted of mainly whites (88.7%). The CAP study showed an association of their Hap2 (Haplotype 2) and/or Hap7 (Haplotype 7) with lower baseline LDL-c level in blacks, but not in whites. The CAP Hap2 and Hap7 are analogous to our H2a and H2b in AA, respectively; the combination of the Hap2 and Hap7 is analogous to our H2 in the other ethnic groups. The study herein supports the association of the H2 with lower TG in both AA and HA. In addition, the percentage of the designated Hap2 in the CAP study was higher in AA (32%) than EA (2%), which was similar to our results (H2a, 44.9% in AA and H2, 5.5% in EA). In AA, we observed the association of the H2 haplotype with lower TG instead of LDL-c level shown in the previous study [20]. In HA, this is the first association data that showed significant associations between HMGCR haplotypes with multiple lipid/lipoprotein traits, especially with TG, s-LDL, and HDL-c. In CHA, we did not observe any association, although an association between 8302A/C variation of the HMGCR gene and lipids was reported in one Chinese study [33]. It should be noticed that the absence of H2 in CHA and the lack of the distinct, separable H4 and H8 haplotypes in AA and EA could well have accounted for the ethnic differences in the associations. Because the associations of the HMGCR gene with lipid/lipoprotein traits were mainly in AA and HA, and the haplotype distribution was remarkably different between ethnicities, future studies of statin therapy will need to include adequate representation from several ethnic groups, such as AA and HA.

Recently, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) [34] using variance-weighted meta-analysis from up to four GWAS revealed an association between SNP rs12654264 of HMGCR and LDL-c level in the European population (p=1 × 10-20). A simultaneous GWAS [35] using similar study cohorts did not report this association (threshold p=5 × 10-7). Based on the CEU data in HapMap, SNP rs12654264 is in LD with rs3846662 (r2=0.84) and rs3846663 (r2=0.97); however, in our white group, both SNPs did not exhibit any significant association with lipids level in EA (p>0.05). The SNP rs12654264 is in complete LD with rs3846662 and rs3846663 in the CHB and JPT data. In our CHA group, neither of the two SNPs was associated with lipids traits. The SNP rs12654264 is not in LD with any of our tagSNPs in the AA group, and both the two SNPs rs3846662 and rs3846663 showed no association with lipids traits in AA. The only association discovered in our study between lipids and the two SNPs was rs3846663 with TG levels and l-VLDL and m-VLDL in HA. We had no LD information between rs3846663 and rs12654264 in our Hispanic groups. The inconsistency between the two GWAS and/or our reports might be caused by the different sample size and study/analysis methods. Independent confirmation for this inconsistency is necessary. Further studies addressing the function related to the SNP and the intermediate phenotypes such as mevalonate and HMG-CoA reductase would increase the evidence supporting a functional biochemical evidence for the association.

It is somewhat surprising that the HMGCR gene was associated with TG and HDL-c because HMGCR does not play a direct role in TG synthesis and hydrolysis. The association may be indirectly caused by the requirement of hepatic cholesterol for VLDL assembly, [36] regulation of LDL receptor number, and the conversion of s-LDL from large TG-rich VLDL particles [36]. Several studies have also shown the effect of statin on lowering TG and increasing HDL-c [16]. The HMGCR gene is thus a potential contributor, at least to some extent, for the differences in statin response of TG and HDL-c.

In summary, HMGCR gene variations were associated with multiple lipid/lipoprotein traits in African-Americans and Hispanic-Americans. The impact of the HMGCR gene on lipid/lipoprotein levels appears modest, and differs greatly between ethnicities.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by contracts N01-HC-95159 through N01-HC-95169 (MESA), RO1HL071205 (MESA Family), and HL069757 (PARC) from the NHLBI. We thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org.

References

1. Lewington S, Whitlock G, Clarke R, Sherliker P, Emberson J, Halsey J, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55,000 vascular deaths. Lancet. 2007;370:1829–1839. [PubMed]
2. Johnson JL, Slentz CA, Duscha BD, Samsa GP, McCartney JS, Houmard JA, Kraus WE. Gender and racial differences in lipoprotein subclass distributions: the STRRIDE study. Atherosclerosis. 2004;176:371–377. [PubMed]
3. Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2002;287:356–359. [PubMed]
4. Freedman DS, Strogatz DS, Eaker E, Joesoef MR, DeStefano F. Differences between black and white men in correlates of high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:656–669. [PubMed]
5. Anand SS, Yusuf S, Vuksan V, Devanesen S, Teo KK, Montague PA, Kelemen L, Yi C, Lonn E, Gerstein H, Hegele RA, McQueen M. Differences in risk factors, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease between ethnic groups in Canada: the Study of Health Assessment and Risk in Ethnic groups (SHARE) Lancet. 2000;356:279–284. [PubMed]
6. Austin MA, King MC, Vranizan KM, Krauss RM. Atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype A proposed genetic marker for coronary heart disease risk. Circulation. 1990;82:495–506. [PubMed]
7. Edwards KL, Mahaney MC, Motulsky AG, Austin MA. Pleiotropic genetic effects on LDL size, plasma triglyceride, and HDL cholesterol in families. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:2456–2464. [PubMed]
8. Rainwater DL, Martin LJ, Comuzzie AG. Genetic control of coordinated changes in HDL and LDL size phenotypes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:1829–1833. [PubMed]
9. Barzilai N, Atzmon G, Schechter C, Schaefer EJ, Cupples AL, Lipton R, Cheng S, Shuldiner AR. Unique lipoprotein phenotype and genotype associated with exceptional longevity. JAMA. 2003;290:2030–2040. [PubMed]
10. Bosse Y, Vohl MC, Despres JP, Lamarche B, Rice T, Rao DC, Bouchard C, Perusse L. Heritability of LDL peak particle diameter in the Quebec Family Study. Genet Epidemiol. 2003;25:375–381. [PubMed]
11. Bosse Y, Chagnon YC, Despres JP, Rice T, Rao DC, Bouchard C, Perusse L, Vohl MC. Genome-wide linkage scan reveals multiple susceptibility loci influencing lipid and lipoprotein levels in the Quebec Family Study. J Lipid Res. 2004;45:419–426. [PubMed]
12. Hsiao CF, Chiu YF, Chiang FT, Ho LT, Lee WJ, Hung YJ, Chen YD, Donlon TA, Jorgenson E, Curb D, Risch N, Hsiung CA. Genome-wide linkage analysis of lipids in nondiabetic Chinese and Japanese from the SAPPHIRe family study. Am J Hypertens. 2006;19:1270–1277. [PubMed]
13. Duggirala R, Blangero J, Almasy L, Dyer TD, Williams KL, Leach RJ, O’Connell P, Stern MP. A major susceptibility locus influencing plasma triglyceride concentrations is located on chromosome 15q in Mexican Americans. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1237–1245. [PubMed]
14. Kullo IJ, Ding K, Boerwinkle E, Turner ST, de AM. Quantitative trait loci influencing low density lipoprotein particle size in African Americans. J Lipid Res. 2006;47:1457–1462. [PubMed]
15. Yu Y, Wyszynski DF, Waterworth DM, Wilton SD, Barter PJ, Kesaniemi YA, Mahley RW, McPherson R, Waeber G, Bersot TP, Ma Q, Sharma SS, Montgomery DS, Middleton LT, Sundseth SS, Mooser V, Grundy SM, Farrer LA. Multiple QTLs influencing triglyceride and HDL and total cholesterol levels identified in families with atherogenic dyslipidemia. J Lipid Res. 2005;46:2202–2213. [PubMed]
16. Vaughan CJ, Gotto AM., Jr Update on statins: 2003. Circulation. 2004;110:886–892. [PubMed]
17. Lee E, Ryan S, Birmingham B, Zalikowski J, March R, Ambrose H, Moore R, Lee C, Chen Y, Schneck D. Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics in white and Asian subjects residing in the same environment. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005;78:330–341. [PubMed]
18. Simon JA, Lin F, Hulley SB, Blanche PJ, Waters D, Shiboski S, Rotter JI, Nickerson DA, Yang H, Saad M, Krauss RM. Phenotypic predictors of response to simvastatin therapy among African-Americans and Caucasians: the Cholesterol and Pharmacogenetics (CAP) Study. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:843–850. [PubMed]
19. Chasman DI, Posada D, Subrahmanyan L, Cook NR, Stanton VP, Jr, Ridker PM. Pharmacogenetic study of statin therapy and cholesterol reduction. JAMA. 2004;291:2821–2827. [PubMed]
20. Krauss RM, Mangravite LM, Smith JD, Medina MW, Wang D, Guo X, Rieder MJ, Simon JA, Hulley SB, Waters D, Saad M, Williams PT, Taylor KD, Yang H, Nickerson DA, Rotter JI. Variation in the 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase gene is associated with racial differences in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to simvastatin treatment. Circulation. 2008;117:1537–1544. [PubMed]
21. Medina MW, Gao F, Ruan W, Rotter JI, Krauss RM. Alternative splicing of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase is associated with plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to simvastatin. Circulation. 2008;118:355–362. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Burkhardt R, Kenny EE, Lowe JK, Birkeland A, Josowitz R, Noel M, Salit J, Maller JB, Pe’er I, Daly MJ, Altshuler D, Stoffel M, Friedman JM, Breslow JL. Common SNPs in HMGCR in micronesians and whites associated with LDL-cholesterol levels affect alternative splicing of exon13. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:2078–2084. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, ez Roux AV, Folsom AR, Greenland P, Jacob DR, Jr, Kronmal R, Liu K, Nelson JC, O’Leary D, Saad MF, Shea S, Szklo M, Tracy RP. Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:871–881. [PubMed]
24. Mora S, Szklo M, Otvos JD, Greenland P, Psaty BM, Goff DC, Jr, O’Leary DH, Saad MF, Tsai MY, Sharrett AR. LDL particle subclasses, LDL particle size, and carotid atherosclerosis in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Atherosclerosis. 2007;192:211–217. [PubMed]
25. Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Yi Q, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA. Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:106–120. [PubMed]
26. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:263–265. [PubMed]
27. Fan JB, Gunderson KL, Bibikova M, Yeakley JM, Chen J, Wickham GE, Lebruska LL, Laurent M, Shen R, Barker D. Illumina universal bead arrays. Methods Enzymol. 2006;410:57–73. [PubMed]
28. Gunderson KL, Kruglyak S, Graige MS, Garcia F, Kermani BG, Zhao C, Che D, Dickinson T, Wickham E, Bierle J, Doucet D, Milewski M, Yang R, Siegmund C, Haas J, Zhou L, Oliphant A, Fan JB, Barnard S, Chee MS. Decoding randomly ordered DNA arrays. Genome Res. 2004;14:870–877. [PubMed]
29. de Bakker P. Tagger. 2004. http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/tagger.
30. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68:978–989. [PubMed]
31. Crawford DC, Nickerson DA. Definition and clinical importance of haplotypes. Annu Rev Med. 2005;56:303–320. [PubMed]
32. Benton JL, Ding J, Tsai MY, Shea S, Rotter JI, Burke GL, Post W. Associations between two common polymorphisms in the ABCA1 gene and subclinical atherosclerosis: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Atherosclerosis. 2007;193:352–360. [PubMed]
33. Tong Y, Zhang S, Li H, Su Z, Kong X, Liu H, Xiao C, Sun Y, Shi JJ. 8302A/C and (TTA)n polymorphisms in the HMG-CoA reductase gene may be associated with some plasma lipid metabolic phenotypes in patients with coronary heart disease. Lipids. 2004;39:239–241. [PubMed]
34. Kathiresan S, Melander O, Guiducci C, Surti A, Burtt NP, Rieder MJ, Cooper GM, Roos C, Voight BF, Havulinna AS, Wahlstrand B, Hedner T, Corella D, Tai ES, Ordovas JM, Berglund G, Vartiainen E, Jousilahti P, Hedblad B, Taskinen MR, Newton-Cheh C, Salomaa V, Peltonen L, Groop L, Altshuler DM, Orho-Melander M. Six new loci associated with blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides in humans. Nat Genet. 2008;40:189–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Willer CJ, Sanna S, Jackson AU, Scuteri A, Bonnycastle LL, Clarke R, Heath SC, Timpson NJ, Najjar SS, Stringham HM, Strait J, Duren WL, Maschio A, Busonero F, Mulas A, Albai G, Swift AJ, Morken MA, Narisu N, Bennett D, Parish S, Shen H, Galan P, Meneton P, Hercberg S, Zelenika D, Chen WM, Li Y, Scott LJ, Scheet PA, Sundvall J, Watanabe RM, Nagaraja R, Ebrahim S, Lawlor DA, Ben-Shlomo Y, vey-Smith G, Shuldiner AR, Collins R, Bergman RN, Uda M, Tuomilehto J, Cao A, Collins FS, Lakatta E, Lathrop GM, Boehnke M, Schlessinger D, Mohlke KL, Abecasis GR. Newly identified loci that influence lipid concentrations and risk of coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2008;40:161–169. [PubMed]
36. Packard CJ, Shepherd J. Lipoprotein heterogeneity and apolipoprotein B metabolism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:3542–3556. [PubMed]