PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2759974
NIHMSID: NIHMS132022

MMTV mouse models and the diagnostic values of MMTV-like sequences in human breast cancer

Abstract

Mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) long terminal repeat (LTR)-driven transgenic mice are excellent models for breast cancer as they allow for the targeted expression of various oncogenes and growth factors in neoplastic transformation of mammary glands. Numerous MMTV-LTR-driven transgenic mouse models of breast cancer have been created in the past three decades, including MMTV-neu/ErbB2, cyclin D1, cyclin E, Ras, Myc, int-1 and c-rel. These transgenic mice develop mammary tumors with different latency, histology and invasiveness, reflecting the oncogenic pathways activated by the transgene. Recently, homologous sequences of the env gene of MMTV have been identified in approximately 40% of human breast cancers, but not in normal breast or other types of cancers, suggesting possible involvement of mammary tumor virus in human breast carcinogenesis. Accumulating evidence demonstrates the association of MMTV provirus with progesterone receptor, p53 mutations and advanced-stage breast cancer. Thus, the detection of MMTV-like sequences may have diagnostic value to predict the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.

Keywords: breast cancer, c-rel, cyclin D1, cyclin E, HMTV, int-1, mouse mammary tumor virus, Myc, neu/ErbB2/HER2, p53, prognosis, Ras, transgenic mouse

Mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV; also known as Bittner virus) is an oncoRNAvirus of the Retroviridae family, which causes breast tumors once activated [14]. Efficient replication of MMTV occurs predominantly in the alveolar epithelial cells of the mammary gland. During lactation, MMTV expression markedly increases under the influence of steroid hormones. Moreover, inbred strains of mice (e.g., C3H) that contain dominantly expressed integrated MMTV genomes (provirus) can also transmit replication competent viruses genetically [16]. By contrast, among mouse strains derived from feral animals devoid of integrated MMTV (e.g., Czech II mice), viral infections are transmitted solely by the milk of an infected mother and are not usually transmitted horizontally between adult mice [68]. In cases of milk-borne transmission, virions pass through the gut wall and, via the gastric vein, to the spleen where the virus infects lymphoid cells [1]. The MMTV induces premalignant lesions and malignant tumors of the mammary gland by acting as an insertional mutagen or activating transcription of nearby oncogenes [1,2,9]. Molecular analysis of proviral integration sites in tumors has led to the discovery of a number of cellular proto-oncogenes. Int-1 (Wnt1) was the first gene discovered to be activated by an integrated provirus; since then, int-2–6 genes have also been isolated and characterized [2].

Promoters of MMTV-LTR, WAP, BLG and C(3)1 have been frequently used to create transgenic mouse models of breast cancer. Among these, MMTV-LTR has most frequently been used to express a gene of interest in the mammary epithelium since the promoter is active in both nonlactating and lactating females.

D-type cyclins (D1, D2 and D3) are induced in the context of a delayed early response to growth factor stimulation. In the presence of mitogens, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (Cdk4 and Cdk6) are synthesized and assemble with their D-type cyclin catalytic partners [10,11]. Cyclin D-Cdk holoenzymes have two distinct functions in promoting progression through the G1 phase of the cell division cycle: catalysis of the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) and accumulation of cyclin D-Cdk holoenzymes that recruit Cdk inhibitors (e.g., p27Kip1 and p21Cip1) into higher order complexes, thereby neutralizing their effects on other Cdks. This process facilitates the activation of cyclin E-Cdk2 later in the G1 phase and the release of E2F proteins from the constraint of Rb and histone deacetylases [10,11]. p19Arf is an alternative reading frame gene product generated from the Ink4a/Arf locus that directly binds to Mdm2, thereby stabilizing and activating p53. Since this single genetic locus encodes two independent tumor-suppressor proteins that regulate the p53 and the Rb pathways, it is frequently (~40%) disrupted in human cancers [10,11].

As of the date of this publication, more than 50 transgenic mouse models of breast cancer have been generated. This review gives a brief description of MMTV-neu/ErbB2, cyclin D1, cyclin E, Ras, Myc, int-1/Wnt1 and c-rel models and their relevance to human breast cancer. neu/ErbB2, cyclin D1, cyclin E, Ras, Myc, int-1/Wnt1 and c-rel have been selected based on the fact that these genes are frequently overexpressed or mutated in human breast cancers. Moreover, the products of these genes influence the expression levels of cyclin D1, which plays critical roles in breast cancer development. Tumor-free survival, accelerating factors and histopathology of single and compound transgenic mice are summarized in Table 1. The signaling cascades involving these molecules are depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Signaling pathways involving target proteins overexpressed in mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) breast cancer models
Table 1
Tumor-free survival, accelerating factors and histopathology of mouse mammary tumor virus transgenic breast cancer models

MMTV-neu & MMTV-ErbB2 models

ErbB2 (neu/HER2), along with ErbB1 (HER1), ErbB3 (HER3) and ErbB4 (HER4), comprise the EGFR family of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), which form homo- and hetero-dimers in response to ligand stimulation [12,13]. HER1–HER2 and HER2– HER3 dimerization leads to activation of MAP kinase and phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways, respectively, leading to cell cycle proliferation signals. ErbB2 genomic amplifications have been reported in 20–30% of human breast cancers [1416]. Furthermore, its overexpression is observed in invasive human ductal carcinomas and is observed in benign breast disorders, such as hyperplasias and dysplasia, although less frequently [17,18]. It is also important to note that ErbB2 overexpression serves as a clinically useful prognostic marker. Rat neu possesses a valine to glutamic acid substitution in its transmembrane domain that results in the constitutive aggregation and activation of the receptor in the absence of ligand [1923]. Although the transmembrane point mutation has not been detected in primary human breast cancers overexpressing ErbB2, studies have detected an alternative splice form in human breast cancers [24,25]. Additionally, MMTV-neu breast tumors exhibit sporadic mutations in neu resulting in its constitutive activation. Mutations commonly encountered include multiple frame deletions, insertions or point mutations in the extracellular domain of the neu protein. Formation of intermolecular disulfide bonds further promotes the transforming ability of this transgene [29,30]. Transgenic mice (MMTV-neu) expressing activated neu develop multifocal mammary tumors at a median age of 5–10 months with frequent potential to metastasize to the lung [2628]. Typical pictures of mammary tumors from MMTV-neu mice (7 months old) and immunohistochemical staining of cyclin D1, Cdk4 and Ki-67 are shown in Figure 2. In males, bilateral enlargement of parotid glands and epididymis has been reported [26]. This phenotype was exhibited in carriers of TG.NF and TG.NA strains and was characterized by both hypertrophy and hyperplasia in the salivary gland epithelium. Although both mucous and serous glands showed some degree of dysplasia, none of these animals developed overt neoplasia [26]. Dysplasia of Harderian glands has also been reported in TG.NF, TG.NA and TG.NB strains of MMTV-neu mice (Table 2). It should be noted that these tissues of extramammary tumor development correspond to those where the MMTV-LTR is known to be transcriptionally active [26].

Figure 2
Breast cancers found in mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-neu mice
Table 2
Tumor spectra and the frequency of extra-mammary gland tumors reported in mouse mammary tumor virus transgenic models

Mice strains bearing the wild-type ErbB2 allele under the control of the MMTV promoter have also been established (MMTV-unactivated neu; MMTV-ErbB2 in Table 1) [31]. In contrast to the rapid tumor progression observed in several transgenic strains carrying the activated neu transgene, expression of unactivated neu in the mammary epithelium resulted in the development of focal mammary tumors with longer latency than wild-type neu (8–12 months dependent on the strain, Table 1). Overexpression of neu in these mammary tumors was associated with elevated intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity of neu and the de novo tyrosine phosphorylation of several cellular proteins. Interestingly, many of the tumor-bearing transgenic mice developed secondary metastatic lesions in the lung. These observations suggest that overexpression of the unactivated neu protein can induce metastatic disease after long latency [31]. Li et al. examined the role of mutations in p53 in mammary tumor development in these mice [32]. They found that 37% of tumors arising in these mice had missense mutations in p53. They have directly tested for cooperativity between wild-type ErbB2 and mutant p53 in mammary tumorigenesis by creating bitransgenic mice carrying MMTV-ErbB2 (line N#202) and WAP-p53–172H. In these bitransgenic mice, tumor latency was shortened to 154 days, indicating strong cooperativity (Table 1) [32]. Tumors arising in the WAP-p53–172H; MMTV-ErbB2 bitransgenic mice were anaplastic and aneuploid and exhibited increased apoptosis, in contrast to tumors arising in p53-null mice. In these bitransgenic mice, Li et al. recapitulated the two common genetic lesions that occur in human breast cancer and showed that p53 mutation is an important cooperating event in wild-type neu/ErbB2-mediated oncogenesis [32].

p16INK4a is deleted in 40–60% of human breast cancer cell lines, and p16INK4a inactivation by DNA methylation occurs in 20–30% of human breast cancers [33]. To test the effects of Ink4a/Arf inactivation in ErbB2-induced breast carcinogenesis, MMTV-ErbB2 mice were crossed Ink4a/Arf-null mice [33]. Compared with MMTV-ErbB2; Ink4a/Arf+/- mice, MMTV-ErbB2; Ink4a/Arfwt mammary tumors showed increased p16Ink4a, reduced Ki-67 expression and reduced cyclin D1 protein, but increased mammary tumor apoptosis with no significant change in breast tumor-free survival. Since Eμ-Myc-induced lymphomagenesis was reported to be accelerated in Ink4a/Arf+/- mice, their study demonstrated that the contribution of Ink4a/Arf heterozygosity to tumor progression was tissue-specific in vivo [33]. The contribution of homozygous deletion of the Ink4a/Arf locus was not clear in their study due to the fact the Ink4a/Arf-null mice spontaneously developed other tumors faster than MMTV-ErbB2 mice [33].

In human breast cancer with HER2 amplification, the c-ErbB2 gene is controlled by its own promoter. To test whether expression of activated neu under the control of the endogenous promoter in the mammary gland contribute to breast cancer development, knock-in mice for activated neu were created, which showed accelerated lobulo-alveolar development and formation of focal mammary tumors after a long latency period (Table 1) [34]. However, expression of activated ErbB2 under the endogenous promoter was not sufficient for the initiation of mammary carcinogenesis. Interestingly, relative to the wild-type allele, all tumors isolated from these mice bear amplified copies (from two to 22 copies) of the activated ErbB2 allele and express highly elevated levels of the ErbB2 transcript and protein. Thus, similar to human HER2-positive breast carcinomas, mammary tumorigenesis in this mouse model requires the amplification and elevated expression of the ErbB2 gene and protein [3436]. Interestingly, in comparison to MMTV-neu mice, the ErbB2-knock-in mice showed significantly increased tumor latency and an extremely low metastasis rate [34]. Gene-expression profiling of tumor RNA from MMTV-neu and ErbB2-knock-in mice revealed distinctive and nonoverlapping patterns of gene expression. Consistent with the noninvasive nature of the mammary tumors induced by expression of neu under the endogenous promoter, the tumors from ErbB2-knock-in mice expressed a number of markers characteristic of a highly differentiated state. In addition, these knock-in tumors expressed elevated levels of two genes (Grb7 and Cab1) closely linked to ErbB2 that are often co-amplified in human noninvasive ductal carcinoma in situ [35,36]. These studies demonstrate that the promoter used to drive ErbB2 expression, a key regulator of gene/protein expression levels, developmental stages, and the cell types where ErbB2 is expressed, significantly affects breast tumor phenotypes. In summary, like HER2-positive human breast carcinomas, mammary tumorigenesis in mice requires gene amplification and elevated expression of the ErbB2 gene.

MMTV-cyclin D1

Cyclins are the major regulators of activation of the cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), inducing cell cycle progression, S-phase entry and DNA replication [10,11]. Endogenous cyclin D1 expression is essential for normal alveolobular mammary gland development [37]. The human Cyclin D1 gene is located on human chromosome 11q13 and is amplified in approximately 15% of breast cancers, which is associated with poor prognosis of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients [38,39]. On the other hand, the cyclin D1 protein is overexpressed in more than 50% of human breast cancers and is associated with improved relapse-free and overall survival, possibly because breast tumors without cyclin D1 expression have mutations of other genes, such as RB [4042]. Thus, the interpretation of prognostic studies for cyclin D1 in breast cancer is complicated, and further investigations with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up period are required to ascertain the true prognostic value of cyclin D1 overexpression in breast cancer.

Overexpression of cyclin D1 through the MMTV promoter results in proliferative abnormalities leading to the onset of focal mammary tumors around 18–22 months (Table 1) [43,44]. As with the c-Myc transgenic models, the long latency and focal nature of these tumors suggests that although cyclin D1 can promote mammary tumorigenesis, additional genetic changes are needed for the development of overt mammary carcinomas. Moreover, activation of Src kinases, integrin linked kinase and ErbB2 induces a cyclin D1 neoplastic response [45]. cyclin D1 is also a critical target in MMTV-neu- and MMTV-ras-induced breast carcinogenesis, but not in MMTV-Myc or -int-1 mice (Figures 1 & 2) [46]. Mice lacking Cdk4 have resistance to mammary carcinomas triggered by the ErbB2 oncogene [47]. In fact, cyclin D1–Cdk4 complexes are needed to induce breast tumor cell proliferation [47]. Collectively, these observations suggest that cyclin D1 plays a critical role in both normal mammary gland development and mammary tumorigenesis.

Cyclin D1 levels are maintained at steady state by phosphorylation-dependent nuclear export and polyubiquitination by SCF (FBX4-αB crystallin) [44]. The contribution of stable cyclin D1 to breast cancer development has not been evaluated. Lin et al. generated transgenic mice where expression of a stable cyclin D1 allele (D1T286A) is regulated by MMTV-LTR [44]. MMTV-D1T286A mice developed mammary adenocarcinomas at a significantly increased rate (18 months) relative to MMTV-D1 mice (22 months) (Table 1). Similar to human cancers that overexpress cyclin D1, D1T286A tumors were ER-positive and exhibited estrogen-dependent growth. Their results indicated that temporal control of cyclin D1 subcellular localization and proteolysis is critical for maintenance of homeostasis within the mammary epithelium [44].

It has been reported that the basal-like subtype of human breast carcinomas is associated with invasiveness, high rates of post-surgical recurrence and poor prognosis. Little is known about the molecular mechanisms that cause basal breast carcinomas. Corsino et al. created heterogeneous MMTV-cyclin D1-Cdk2 (MMTV-D1K2) transgenic mice and found that the mammary tumors contain regions of spindle-shaped cells expressing both luminal and myoepithelial markers [48]. Cell lines cultured from these tumors exhibited the same luminal/myoepithelial mixed-lineage phenotype that is associated with human basal-like breast carcinomas and expressed a number of myoepithelial markers. The MMTV-D1K2 breast tumor-derived cell lines formed highly invasive tumors when injected into mouse mammary glands [48]. Invasion was associated with loss of E-cadherin expression or E-cadherin localization to the cytoplasm. They also showed that cytoplasmic E-cadherin correlated with lack of colony formation in vitro and β-catenin and p120(ctn) localization to the cytoplasm. Together, their results suggest that abnormal cyclin D1 and Cdk2 activation may contribute to the formation of basal-like breast carcinomas [48].

MMTV-cyclin E

Cyclin E is a G1 cyclin necessary for the transition from G1 to S phase of the normal cell cycle [35,36]. Overexpression of cyclin E accelerates the entry of the cells into S phase, but causes inefficient G1–S progression. The untimely expression of cyclin E has been shown to interfere with the replication complex assembly as cells exit mitosis [49]. Oncogenic roles for cyclin E have been demonstrated by studies with cyclin E-deficient cells that are resistant to transformation by Myc alone, Myc and mutant Ras, dominant-negative p53, or E1A, suggesting that cyclin E is a key component in oncogenic signaling [50]. Constitutive overexpression of cyclin E protein at all phases of the cell cycle is one of the features observed in breast cancer and is considered to result in premature DNA replication, genomic instability and, ultimately, breast carcinogenesis [5153].

In several breast cancer cell lines, amplification of the cyclin E gene and constitutive expression of the protein have been identified [5456]. Keyomarsi et al. reported that some of the breast cancer cell lines overexpressed up to five low-molecular-weight (LMW) isoforms in addition to overexpressing the full-length 50-kDa cyclin E protein [5456]. These LMW isoforms are unique to tumor cells, suggesting that they may play specific roles in tumorigenesis. A study with 395 breast cancer samples showed that high levels of total or LMW cyclin E were found in 32.2% of the samples and was the most powerful parameter of short disease-free and overall survival of breast cancer, outperforming criteria currently used clinically, including positive nodes, late-stage (stage III–IV) disease and negative ER status [57].

To study the oncogenic potential of the LMW forms of cyclin E in breast carcinogenesis, transgenic mice expressing full-length cyclin E alone, full-length and the EL4 isoforms, or the EL2/3 isoforms of cyclin E were generated under the control of MMTV-LTR (Table 1) [58]. Compared with full-length cyclin E, LMW cyclin E overexpression induced delayed mammary growth during the pubertal phase and abnormal cell morphology during lactation. Both primary mammary tumor formation and metastasis were markedly enhanced in LMW cyclin E transgenic mice. LMW cyclin E overexpression in mammary epithelial cells of mice was sufficient by itself to induce mammary adenocarcinomas in 34 out of 124 (27.4%) animals compared with seven out of 67 (10.4%) mice expressing only the full-length cyclin E (p < 0.05) (Table 1). In addition, metastasis was seen in 25% of LMW cyclin E tumor-bearing animals compared with only one out of seven (14%) of tumors in the full-length cyclin E background (p < 0.05) (Table 1). Moreover, LMW cyclin E overexpression selected for inactivation of p53 by loss of heterozygosity and spontaneous and frequent inactivation of p19Arf, canceling the protective checkpoint function of the Arf-p53 pathway and accelerating progression to breast cancer [58].

MMTV-Ras

Activating mutations in the Ras oncogenes are found in approximately 30% of human malignancies [5963]. Mutant H-Ras, N-Ras and K-Ras occur in varying frequencies in different tumor types, for reasons that are not completely understood. Other members of the Ras superfamily may also contribute to human cancer development. Mutations also occur in downstream pathways of Ras signaling, notably B-Raf, PTEN and PI3K. These pathways interact at multiple points, including cyclin D1, and act synergistically. Drugs blocking elements of these pathways are in different stages of clinical development [63]. MMTV-Ras mice have been created by placing an activated v-Ha-Ras under the control of the MMTV-LTR (Table 1) [64]. Approximately 20% of MMTV-v-Ha-Ras transgenic mice develop bilateral exophthalmos that is the result of progressive enlargement of the Harderian glands (Table 2). Malignant tumors arose stochastically among transgenic mice between 6 and 12 months and histological examination consistently revealed the presence of mammary adenocarcinomas. Both male and female MMTV-Ras transgenics develop mammary and salivary gland tumors (Tables 1 & 2) [64]. Crossing MMTV-Ras mice with p53-knock-out mice resulted in dramatic acceleration of mammary tumor progression (Table 1) [65]. Mammary tumors found in these MMTV-Ras; p53-null compound mice also displayed higher histological grades, increased growth rates, extensive genomic instability and dramatically shortened survival (~3 months) compared with those found in the MMTV-Ras transgenic alone (9–10 months; Table 1) [65,66]. In another study with MMTV-Ras mice, p21cip1-deficiency resulted in an acceleration of both mammary and salivary tumor onset [67]. In addition, it was shown that activated Ras has greater transforming potential in keratinocytes from p21Cip1-deficient mice than from p21Cip1 wild-type mice, suggesting that p21Cip1 suppresses tumorigenesis by Ras [68,69].

MMTV-c-Myc

Myc proteins regulate oncogenic response by their ability to both activate and repress target genes [70,71]. Myc, along with Cdc6 and Orc-1, regulates the initiation of DNA replication [72]. Expression of the c-Myc protooncogene is upregulated in as many as 80% of human breast cancers and c-Myc amplification is associated with poor prognosis of patients [73]. MMTV-Myc mice develop spontaneous mammary adenocarcinomas by 10–15 months of age (Table 1) [74,75]. Furthermore, the WAP promoter can elevate expression of Myc and accelerate the formation of tumors in multiple mammary glands as early as 2 months [75].

In another experiment, interbreeding of MMTV-v-Ha-Ras strains with the MMTV-c-Myc mice produced bitransgenic mice expressing both c-Myc and activated Ras. This new strain developed focal mammary tumors with a dramatically shortened latency period (Table 1), indicating that c-Myc and activated Ras cooperate to accelerate mammary tumor development with pronounced malignancy [64]. Simultaneous overexpression of c-Myc and mutant Ras also changed the tumor spectrum in extra-mammary tissues, with increased incidence of B-cell lymphomas (38% in bitransgenic mice and 3% in Ha-Ras-transgenic mice) and occurrence of seminal vesicle neoplasia (5% in bitransgenic mice) (Table 2) [64]. Of note, one out of 21 bitransgenic mice developed three different tumors in the same animal and one out of 21 developed four independent primary tumors [64]. Together, their results indicated that the incidence of B cell lymphomas dramatically increased as a consequence of coexpression of the v-Ha-Ras and the c-Myc transgenes [64].

Generally, overexpression of c-Myc in normal cells induces apoptosis with simultaneous activation of the Arf-p53 pathway and Apaf-1 caspase-9 [76,77]. Conversely, the Ras oncogene has been demonstrated to inhibit cellular susceptibility to apoptosis in several experimental systems [5963]. MMTV-Myc mammary tumors had much higher levels of spontaneous apoptosis than MMTV-Ras tumors, whereas intermediate levels were observed in MMTV-Myc/Ras double transgenic mammary tumors. Significant differences in cell cycle characteristics were also observed in tumors from mice of the three genotypes [69]. Tumors from MMTV-Myc mice had lower G1- and higher S-phase fractions than MMTV-Ras tumors, with intermediate values again observed in the MMTV-Myc/Ras tumors.

The cell cycle-promoting phosphatase cdc25A is an activator of Cdks and one of the downstream targets for the Chk1-mediated checkpoint pathway [78]. The Myc/Max heterodimer binds to elements in the cdc25A gene and activates transcription. Similar to Myc, cdc25A, itself a protooncogene, can induce apoptosis in cells depleted of growth factor. Myc-induced apoptosis also requires cdc25A. These findings indicate that cdc25A is a physiologically relevant transcriptional target of c-Myc [79]. Whereas cdc25A overexpression is observed in various human cancers, it has not been determined if deregulated cdc25A expression triggers or promotes breast tumorigenesis in vivo. Ray et al. created MMTV-cdc25A mice and showed that the transgenics exhibit alveolar hyperplasia in the mammary tissue, but do not develop spontaneous mammary tumors [78]. However, the MMTV-cdc25A transgene markedly shortened the latency of mammary tumorigenesis in MMTV-ras mice, consistent with the fact that cdc25 is a critical target of c-Myc in cell cycle progression [78,79].

MMTV-Myc mice are also responsive to p21Cip1 expression [69]. The paradoxical possibility that p21Cip1 can function as either a negative or positive regulator of Cdk activity has been demonstrated by both biochemical and cell culture studies [80,81]. MMTV-Myc; p21Cip1-/- tumors displayed a significantly reduced number of cells in S phase, accompanied by a decrease in both cyclin D1- and cyclin E-associated Cdk activity. Also, p21Cip1 promotes an increase in G1 cyclin/Cdk activity, leading to the higher S-phase fractions seen in tumors from MMTV-Myc mice. McCormack et al. reported lack of both p53 alleles in the presence of c-Myc overexpression resulted in a dramatic hyperplastic alteration in mammary gland development [82]. Specifically, in female bitransgenic MMTV-Myc; p53-null mice (MMTV-Myc; p53-/-), lobular hyperplasias were observed at almost every ductal end bud as early as 32 days of age. By contrast, only mild ductal and lobular hyperplasias were seen in MMTV-Myc mice that contained both p53 alleles (MMTV-Myc; p53+/+); an intermediate phenotype occurred in mice with a single intact p53 allele (MMTV-Myc; p53+/-). Spectral karyotyping analysis revealed that there were multiple chromosomal alterations in the c-Myc-overexpressing cells that contained either one or two unmutated p53 allele(s). Mammary carcinomas arose with a high frequency in MMTV-Myc; p53+/- mice; the tumors were comparable in frequency, histology and apoptotic index to the tumors in MMTV-Myc; p53+/+ mice. Lymphomas also developed with extremely short latency in MMTV-Myc; p53-/- mice, precluding study of the fate of their hyperplastic mammary lesions in situ [82].

MMTV-int-1

The int genes were originally identified as oncogenes activated by the insertion of MMTV in virus-induced mammary adenocarcinomas [2]. The int genes fall into three groups: the Wnt (int-1/Wnt1, int-4/Wnt3, Wnt10b) family, the Fgf family (int-2/Fgf3, Hst/Fgf4, Fgf8), and others (int-3/Notch4, int-5/aromatase, int- 6) [2,8385]. Generally, the Wnt signaling pathway plays critical roles in cell proliferation and differentiation, cell movement and polarity, and the self-renewal capacity of stem cells [86,87]. The canonical Wnt signaling pathway is shown in Figure 1. Once bound by Wnt, the Frizzled (Fz)/low-density lipoprotein-related protein (LRP) coreceptor complex activates the canonical signaling pathway. Fz interacts with Dishevelled (Dsh), a cytoplasmic protein that functions upstream of β-catenin and the kinase GSK3β. Wnt signaling controls phosphorylation of Dsh and induces the phosphorylation of LRP by GSK3β and casein kinase I-γ (CK1γ), thus regulating the docking of Axin. The recruitment of Axin away from the destruction complex leads to the stabilization of β-catenin. In the nucleus, β-catenin displaces Groucho from Tcf/Lef to promote the transcription of Wnt target genes, one of which is cyclin D1 (Figure 1).

The most convincing evidence for the involvement of Wnt signaling in human breast cancer is the overexpression of nuclear and/or cytoplasmic β-catenin, as assessed by immunohistochemistry, in tumor tissues [88,89]. Two groups independently reported that approximately 60% of human breast cancers showed elevated expression of β-catenin [90,91], and the former group demonstrated that the β-catenin staining correlated with high expression of Cyclin D1 and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients [90]. Although mutations of β-catenin, APC or Axin genes are rare, several studies reported the overexpression of WNT genes (WNT2, 3, 4, 5A, 7B, 10B, 13 and 14) in breast cancer relative to normal tissues [88]. In addition to abnormal Wnt overexpression in breast cancer, reduced expression of soluble extracellular Wnt inhibitors has also been reported [88]. Thus, the Wnt pathway is dysregulated in human breast cancer possibly through epigenetic mechanisms.

The int-1/Wnt1 gene is related to the Drosophila gene wingless, which controls segment polarity during larval development [84]. Transcriptional activation of int-1/Wnt1 gene by proviral insertion mutations associated with mammary gland hyperplasia has been considered to be a key step in mammary tumor induction by MMTV [9,92,93]. MMTV-int-1 transgenic mice exhibit stochastically developed mammary carcinomas, suggesting that additional events are necessary for tumorigenesis [94]. To induce such events and to identify the genes involved, Shackleford et al. infected int-1-transgenic mice with MMTV, intending to insertionally activate and molecularly tag cooperating protooncogenes [94]. Infection of breeding female int-1 transgenics decreased the average age of breast tumor onset from approximately 4 to 2.5 months and increased the average number of primary tumors per mouse from one or two to more than five [94]. Analyses of provirus-containing tumors showed induced or altered expression of int-2/Fgf-3, Hst/Fgf-4, int-3/Notch and int-4/Wnt3, where activation of int-2 was found in 39% of the breast tumors, Hst in 3% and both int-2 and Hst in 3%. Their study provided evidence that int-2 and Hst can cooperate with int-1, another secreted factor, in mammary tumorigenesis [94]. Donehower et al. crossed MMTV-int-1 mice with p53-deficient mice and observed acceleration of mammary tumorigenesis from 24 weeks to 11.5 weeks (Table 1) [95]. Mammary tumors lacking p53 displayed less fibrotic histopathology and increased genomic instability with aneuploidy, amplifications and deletions [95]. Interestingly, one tumor showed amplification of chromosome 7 with an ectopic expression of the int-2/Fgf-3 proto-oncogene, confirming collaboration between int-1 and int-2 in this compound mouse model as well [95].

To test the functional significance of cyclin D1 induction by the Wnt pathway (Figure 1), Rowland et al. investigated the genetic interaction between transcriptionally active β-catenin (ΔN89β-catenin) and its target gene cyclin D1 in mouse mammary gland development and tumorigenesis [96]. They showed that cyclin D1 was dispensable for the ΔN89β-catenin-stimulated initiation of alveologenesis in virgin females and for the formation of breast tumors. These data were consistent with previous observations made by Yu et al. [46]. Thus, alveologenesis is a two-step process, and cyclin D1 activity during late alveologenesis cannot be replaced by the activity of other β-catenin target genes that successfully drive proliferation at earlier stages [96].

Expression of the int-3 locus is activated by MMTV as a consequence of insertional mutagenesis. Integration of the MMTV provirus into the int-3 locus promotes the transcription and translation of flanking cellular int-3 sequences that showed significant homology with the intracellular domain of the neurogenic Notch gene of Drosophila [97]. Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved pathway that regulates a variety of physiological processes including stem cell maintenance, cellular differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis. There are four mammalian homologues of Drosophila Notch (Notch14). The roles of Notch signaling in breast cancer and tumor angiogenesis have been reviewed [98,99]. Poor differentiation of mammary and salivary adenocarcinomas has been reported in MMTV-int-3/Notch 4 transgenic mice between 2 and 7 months of age [97]. All female int-3/Notch4 mice were lactationally deficient and mammary gland development was arrested. The salivary glands, glands of the nasal mucosa and sinus, the extraorbital lacrimal glands, and the Harderian glands of juvenile and adult transgenic mice all contained proliferating, immature ductule cells that were incompletely differentiated. It was also reported that all male int-3/Notch4 transgenic mice were sterile, apparently the result of severe hyperplasia of the epididymis [97]. In summary, activated int/Notch genes cause hyperproliferation of glandular epithelium predisposing to adenocarcinoma [8489,9799].

MMTV-c-rel

Amplification, overexpression or rearrangement of the c-rel gene, encoding the c-rel NF-κB subunit, has been described in breast carcinomas [100,101]. It was reported that c-rel plays an essential role in tumorigenesis of the mammary gland in an MMTV-LTR-driven mouse model [100]. Mammary tumors were detected in 31.6% of MMTV-c-rel transgenic mice at an average age of 19.9 months (Table 1) [102]. Histological analysis of these tumors revealed a wide spectrum of tumor subtypes, including adenocarcinomas, adenosquamous carcinomas, squamous carcinomas, a spindle cell carcinoma and a papillary carcinoma (Table 1) [102]. The MMTV-c-rel mammary tumors displayed sustained expression of the c-rel transgene mRNA. Increased aberrant nuclear expression of multiple subunits, including c-rel, p50, p52, relA, relB and the Bcl-3 protein was also observed [102]. When compared with mammary glands from wild-type mice or virgin transgenic mice, expression of the NF-κB target genes cyclin D1, c-Myc and Bcl-xl was significantly increased in grossly normal transgenic mammary glands starting with the first cycle of pregnancy; expression increased further in mammary carcinomas [102]. Their results indicated that dysregulated expression of c-rel, as observed in human breast carcinomas, contributes to mammary tumorigenesis.

Interestingly, none of the cell lines established from the MMTV-c-rel mice grew in soft agar. To test the hypothesis that a prototypic carcinogen insult can promote a more invasive, mesenchymal phenotype, Shin et al. established a cell line from a MMTV-c-rel mammary tumor (rel-3983), which was then treated in culture with either 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) (rel-3983D) or DMSO [103]. Rel-3983D breast tumor cells showed an increased rate of proliferation, displayed growth to a higher cell density, and acquired the ability to grow in soft agar and in Matrigel compared with the parental or vehicle-treated cells [103]. They also showed loss of E-cadherin expression. Compared with control cells, rel-3983D displayed increased NF-κB binding and higher levels of the NF-κB transactivating subunits, c-rel, relA and relB. Ectopic expression of an IκB kinase-resistant super repressor mutant of IκB-α reduced rel-3983D cell growth and invasive morphology in Matrigel, confirming the role of NF-κB in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Thus, DMBA treatment of c-rel-transformed mammary tumor cells in culture result in EMT via activation of NF-κB [103].

Doxycycline-inducible MMTV models of breast cancer

Constitutive transgenic mouse models that rely on mammary-specific promoters to control transgene expression have limited utility for studying the effect of developmental events on breast cancer risk since the hormonal signals governing these events also markedly influence transgene expression levels. Gunther et al. created a novel transgenic mouse system that uses the MMTV-LTR to drive expression of the reverse tetracycline-dependent transactivator (rtTA) [104]. They crossed transgenic mice expressing rtTA in the mammary epithelium (MMTV-rtTA) with reporter lines bearing tet operator-controlled transgenes and tested the ability to spatially, temporally and quantitatively control reporter gene expression after administration of doxycycline to bitransgenic mice [104]. They showed that transgene expression using this system could be rapidly induced and de-induced in mammary glands, which could be reproducibly titrated over a wide range of expression levels. Moreover, their system allowed transgene expression to be restricted to any desired stage of postnatal mammary gland development. Moody et al. used this doxycycline-inducible system to conditionally express activated neu in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice to determine the impact of tumor progression on the reversibility of neu-induced tumorigenesis [105]. When induced with doxycycline, bitransgenic MMTV-rtTA, tetO- neuNT mice developed multiple invasive mammary carcinomas; however, essentially all of the tumors regressed to a clinically undetectable state following transgene de-induction. Their data demonstrated that neu-initiated tumorigenesis was reversible. It should be noted that even extensive lung metastases arising from neu-induced tumors rapidly and fully regressed following the abrogation of neu expression. However, despite the near universal dependence of both primary and metastatic tumors on neu transgene expression, most animals bearing fully regressed neu-induced tumors ultimately developed recurrent tumors that have progressed to a neu-independent state, suggesting that secondary genetic alterations occurred during mammary tumor development [105].

By using this inducible model, the same group showed that targeted downregulation of the Wnt pathway results in the rapid disappearance of essentially all Wnt-initiated invasive primary mammary tumors, as well as pulmonary metastases [106]. Interestingly, tumor regression did not require p53 and even occurred in highly aneuploid tumors. However, despite the dependence of primary mammary tumors and metastases on continued Wnt signaling and the dispensability of p53 for tumor regression, they found that a substantial fraction of tumors progressed to a Wnt-independent state and that p53 suppressed this process. Loss of one p53 allele dramatically facilitated the progression of mammary tumors to a Wnt1-independent state both by impairing the regression of primary tumors following doxycycline withdrawal and by promoting the recurrence of fully regressed tumors in the absence of doxycycline. Thus, although p53 itself was dispensable for tumor regression, it played a critical role in the prevention of tumor recurrence [106].

To determine if Ras activation has context-dependent effects in the mammary gland, Sarkisian et al. generated doxycycline-inducible transgenic mice that allowed Ras activation to be titrated [107]. Low levels of Ras activation stimulated cellular proliferation and mammary epithelial hyperplasias similar to those found in non-transformed mouse tissues expressing endogenous oncogenic K-ras2. By contrast, high levels of Ras activation – similar to those found in tumors bearing endogenous K-ras2 mutations – induced cellular senescence that was Ink4a/Arf-dependent and irreversible following Ras downregulation. Chronic low-level Ras induction resulted in tumor formation, but only after the spontaneous upregulation of activated Ras and escape from senescence checkpoints. They further showed that high-level, but not low-level, Ras activation stimulates tumor-suppressor pathways and triggers irreversible senescent growth arrest in vivo [107]. They suggested a three-stage model for Ras-induced tumorigenesis consisting of an initial activating Ras mutation, overexpression of the activated Ras allele and, finally, inactivation of the Ink4a/Arf, p53-dependent senescence checkpoints [107].

Utility of the FVB strain in MMTV transgenic mouse models

Human breast cancer models using MMTV-LTR mice have often been created in the FVB/NJ (FVB) strain due to its high productiveness of pups, while gene-knock-out/knock-in mice have been developed in the 129/SvJ-C57BL/6 strains due to the capacity of 129/SvJ embryonic stem cells to facilitate germline transmission [108]. Gene-targeted mice are commonly backcrossed into the C57BL/6 background for comparison of tumor spectra and other phenotypes that had been reported. Although FVB/N females do not spontaneously develop breast tumors even at 24 months of age [109], it is generally believed that the FVB/N strain is more susceptible to mammary tumors than mice of the C57BL/6 strain. For instance, FVB MMTV-ErbB2 (wild-type) females develop mammary tumors between 7 and 12 months of age, whereas FVB × C57BL/6 (F1) MMTV-ErbB2 mice have tumor latencies greater than 18 months [110]. It should be noted that the expression level of the ErbB2 transgene was equivalent in breast tumor tissues from both FVB and FVB × C57BL/6 (F1) mice. Furthermore, increased tumor latency did not appear to be associated with a decrease in expression of the ErbB2 transgene in the normal mammary gland of F1 mice because immunohistochemical staining for ErbB2 protein expression in the mammary glands of 3-month-old virgin female mice revealed similar levels of protein expression in FVB and F1 animals [110]. When F1 animals were backcrossed one more generation into the FVB strain ([FVB × B6] F1 × FVB; F2), a subset of the resulting offspring developed tumors with a latency almost equivalent to that of the pure-strain FVB mice. Statistical analysis of the genetic variability in mammary tumor latency indicated that approximately three independent genes were involved in the latency effect [110]. Mikaelian et al. categorized transgenic and spontaneous mouse mammary tumors by using morphologic and architectural criteria [111]. On the basis of the expression of terminal differentiation markers, three types of mouse mammary tumors were identified. The first group is ‘simple carcinomas’, composed exclusively of cells with a luminal phenotype (glandular or solid) that are characteristic of neoplasms of other WNT mRNAs neu, Ha-Ras, c-Myc (FVB/N), SV40-TAg (C57BL/6) and spontaneous papillary carcinomas in BALB/cJ mice [111]. The second group is ‘complex carcinomas’, displaying luminal and myoepithelial differentiation that are characteristic of type P tumors arising in mice transgenic for Wnt1 (FVB/N, B6SJ/L), tumors arising in mice infected with MMTV and spontaneous adenosquamous carcinomas in BLAB/cJ mice [111]. The third category is ‘carcinomas with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition’ (EMT), which is a characteristic feature of tumor progression in Ha-Ras-, c-Myc- (FVB/N) and SV40-TAg (C57BL/6)-induced mammary neoplasms and spontaneous tumors in PL/J and SJL/J mouse strains [111]. They concluded that immunohistochemical profiles of complex mammary tumors are consistent with a stem cell origin, whereas simple carcinomas might originate from a cell committed to the luminal lineage [111]. Their results also suggest that the initiating oncogenic events determine the morphologic features associated with cancer progression because EMT is only observed in certain types of neoplasm.

Relevance of MMTV mouse models to human breast cancer

Mouse mammary tumor virus mouse models (oncogene transgenic mice and insertional mutagenesis) have been informative models for human breast cancer despite morphological, hormonal and lifestyle differences between mice and humans. There are at least three different implications of MMTV mouse models to human breast cancer.

First, MMTV-LTR-driven oncogene overexpression models have been useful in the analysis of the signaling cascades governed by oncogenes that are frequently overexpressed or mutated in human breast cancer. These mice have also been used to test the efficacy of new chemopreventive agents in vivo. Crossing these mice with possible tumor-suppressor-knock-out mice has provided valuable information about oncogene–tumor-suppressor gene interactions in vivo.

The second implication is the fact that genes that have been isolated by MMTV insertional mutagenesis are often aberrantly expressed in human breast cancers. The human homologue of the int-2 locus (WNT2) has been found to be amplified and highly expressed in 15–45% of breast cancers [2,89]. Durgam et al. showed that the cellular gene at the MMTV integration site in the int-5 locus was identical to the gene encoding aromatase (CYP19), a member of the cytochrome P-450 gene superfamily [112]. MMTV was integrated within exon 10 in the 3′ untranslated region of the int-5/aromatase gene, which was expressed in normal mammary gland and overexpressed in mammary tumors. Their results suggested that the overexpression of int-5 may be responsible for breast tumorigenesis, demonstrating that the integration of MMTV in a cellular gene that plays a role in hormone-dependent breast cancers. Indeed, overexpression of the human homologue of int-5 (WNT5A) was reported in 36% of human breast cancer [88]. Bui et al. identified the human homologue of the mouse Wnt10b gene, WNT10B, the expression of which was found to be elevated in three out of 50 primary breast carcinomas [113]. Overexpression of other WNT mRNAs (WNT7B, WNT13 and WNT14) has also been reported in human breast carcinomas, as described in the MMTV-int1 section [88]. As a more comprehensive approach, Theodorou et al. conducted a microarray with 295 primary human breast carcinomas and determined the expression levels of the human homologues of the MMTV cis target genes [114]. Interestingly, the expression of 11 of the 33 cis genes were dysregulated in 5–43% of the human breast carcinoma samples they examined [114]. Importantly, most of the MMTV-tagged candidate oncogenes were correlated with one or more clinicopathological tumor characteristics, including angioinvasion, tumor grade and/or lymphatic infiltration [114]. Collectively, genes identified from common MMTV integration sites are often involved in human breast cancer development.

The third implication of MMTV models of breast cancer in human disease is the isolation and characterization of MMTV env-like sequences in human breast carcinomas. The hypothesis that a human retrovirus homologous to the MMTV (HMTV) is involved in human breast cancer etiology has fascinated scientists for many years. In 1972, RNA related to MMTV was detected in human breast cancer cells [115]. Detectable MMTV env gene-related antigenic reactivity has been found in tissue sections of human breast cancers [116], breast cancer cells in culture [117], human milk [118], in the sera of patients [119], in human breast cyst fluid [120] and in particles produced by a human carcinoma cell line [121]. Wang et al. reported that MMTV env-like sequences were detectable in 38.5% of human breast cancer samples from the analysis of 314 cases [122], a finding later confirmed by Etkind et al. [123]. However, the frequency of detection of a MMTV-like virus in human breast cancer varies from 0 to 100%, depending on the demographic distribution of breast cancer samples, source of materials (paraffin-embedded or frozen), and the sensitivity of the methods used [124]. To circumvent the problem of sensitivity and reproducibility for the detection of MMTV env-like sequences, Zammarchi et al. established a fluorescence nested-PCR (FN-PCR) method [125]. With this approach, they were able to detect very low copies of the viral genome. They then screened a panel of 45 frozen breast cancer samples obtained by laser microdissection. The MMTV env gene-like sequence was found in 15 (33%) of the human breast cancers analyzed, whereas the same sequence was undetectable in both normal tissues and in other types of tumors [125]. Sequence analysis revealed 96% homology with the MMTV genome but no significant similarities with the human genome. They concluded that the combined use of frozen material, microdissected cell populations and FN-PCR provides a novel, very sensitive and nonradioactive methodology for the molecular detection of HMTV [125].

Obviously, MMTV env-like sequences alone do not make up an entire provirus. Numerous groups examined human breast cancer samples for the presence of other MMTV-like sequences to the rest of the viral genome. In 2001, Liu et al. reported successful amplification of a whole proviral structure from two human breast carcinomas that were env-positive [126]. The 9.9-kb provirus was 95% homologous to MMTV, but only 57% homologous to 3.5 kb of the gag and pol genes of the human endogenous retrovirus K10. The HMTV provirus displayed typical features of a replication competent retrovirus, plus open reading frames for the superantigen and the glucocorticoid-responsive element [126]. FISH with the 2.7-kb env-LTR probe revealed that the sequence was present on several chromosomes from breast cancer but, importantly, not on chromosomes from normal breast cells [126]. The origin of the MMTV-like sequences appears to be exogenous because they were undetectable in normal tissues, the similarity between the two isolates was very high (96%) and they maintained open reading frames [126]. The same group later reported that MMTV-LTR-like sequences were detectable in 42% of human breast cancer [127]. Their data indicated that the human superantigen that is encoded by an open reading frame located 3′ of the LTR of the provirus was fully functional to activate human T lymphocytes, suggesting a role in human breast cancer pathogenesis.

To investigate the possibility of an association between breast cancer and MMTV-like viruses, histological characteristics of invasive ductal human breast cancer specimens were compared with archival MMTV-associated mammary tumors from C3H experimental mice [128]. The presence of MMTV-like env DNA sequences in the human breast cancer specimens was simultaneously studied by PCR and Southern blotting. MMTV-like env gene sequences were identified in 22 out of 59 (37.3%) human breast cancer specimens, consistent with previous reports from other groups. In total, 17 out of 43 (39.5%) invasive ductal carcinoma breast cancer specimens and four out of 16 (25%) ductal carcinoma in situ specimens had some histological characteristics that were similar to Dunn type A or type B MMTV-associated mouse mammary tumors. However, these similarities were not associated with the presence or absence of MMTV-like gene sequences in the human breast tumor specimens. On the other hand, they reported a significant (p = 0.05) correlation between the lower grade of the human breast cancer and similarity to the mouse mammary tumors [128]. Based on these observations, they proposed a ‘hit and run’ mechanism where an MMTV-like virus initially acts in concert with other viruses to cause breast cancer and then leaves no trace after it has initiated oncogenic change.

Recently, Etkind et al. conducted an intriguing study involving family members diagnosed with breast cancer to determine if MMTV might be implicated in breast cancer development in a familial context [129]. The diagnosis of late-onset breast cancer in a father, mother and daughter living in the same house for decades suggested the possibility of an environmental agent as a common etiological factor. They detected MMTV-like env and LTR sequences containing the MMTV superantigen gene (sag) in the malignant tissues of all three family members. The amplified env gene sequences showed 98.0–99.6% homology to the MMTV env sequences found in the GR, C3H and BR6 mouse strains [129]. Interestingly, the amplified LTR sequences containing sag sequences segregated to specific branches of the MMTV phylogenetic tree and did not form a distinct branch of their own. The presence of MMTV-like DNA sequences in breast cancer tissues of all three family members suggested the possibility of MMTV as an etiological agent. Phylogenetic data suggested that the MMTV-like DNA sequences were mouse in nature and not human-derived and that the ultimate reservoir of MMTV was most likely the mouse. Although the route by which these family members came to be infected with MMTV was unknown, the possibility exists that such infection might have resulted from a shared exposure to mice [129].

All the aforementioned studies clearly suggest that MMTV-related genes may play a very important role in the etiology and pathogenesis of human breast cancer.

Diagnostic values of MMTV-like sequences & proteins in human breast cancer

There have been several reports on the prognostic value of MMTV env-like sequences in human breast cancer [130133]. As the presence of MMTV-like sequences in breast cancer has been associated with laminin receptor expression, a marker of poor prognosis, it was predicted that MMTV-env positivity would predict poor outcome for breast cancer patients. Wang et al. studied the frequency of env gene-like sequences in both sporadic and gestational breast cancer samples [130]. Gestational breast cancer is generally associated with rapid growth and increased mortality. Whereas the target sequences could be identified in 30–38% of sporadic breast cancer samples, the prevalence in gestational breast cancer is 62%. Their findings indicate that hormonal response elements present in the MMTV-like LTR may play a role in promoting cell growth as they do in the mouse system [130].

In another study, a cohort of 128 Australian female breast cancer samples was screened for MMTV-like DNA sequences using PCR [131]. The presence of progesterone receptor, ER and nuclear accumulation of p53 protein was studied in the same samples using immunohistochemical staining. Nuclear accumulation of p53 was significantly more prevalent (p = 0.05) in archival human breast cancers containing MMTV-like DNA sequences. The presence of progesterone receptor was significantly higher in MMTV-positive than MMTV-negative breast cancers (p = 0.01). No correlation between ER and MMTV-like DNA sequences was found. The positive association between MMTV-like DNA sequences and progesterone receptor indicates steroid hormones and MMTV may play a role in human breast cancer. Mutations of the tumor suppressor gene p53 have been reported in approximately 20% of human breast cancers and are associated with poor prognosis of patients [132]. Since nuclear p53 accumulation is usually suggestive of p53 mutation, the association of MMTV-like DNA sequences with higher grades of cancer and nuclear accumulation of p53 clearly warrant additional investigation [132].

The same research group screened a larger and more diverse cohort of female breast cancer samples and revealed a correlation of MMTV-like sequences with the severity (grade) of breast cancer [133]. In total, 34% (43 out of 136) of female breast cancer samples were positive for MMTV-like sequences when screened using PCR. A significant gradient of MMTV positivity was observed with increasing grade of breast cancer, from 23% of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) grade I tumors to 34% of IDC grade II tumors (p = 0.00034) and 38% of IDC grade III tumors (p = 0.00002). They also reported the detection of MMTV-like sequences in 62% (8 out of 13) of male breast cancer samples and 19% (10 out of 52) of male gynecomastia samples analyzed. Interestingly, MMTV-like sequences were detected in various premalignant breast lesions of females, including fibroadenoma (20%) and fibrocystic disease (28%) at a significantly higher prevalence than that in normal breast tissue (1.8%; p = 0.00001). In a study examining a cohort of female breast cancer patients, MMTV-like sequences were discovered to be associated with breast tumors but were not present when tumor cells were not detectable by histopathological examination. Their results support the involvement of MMTV-like sequences in the development of breast tumors in men and women and the association of MMTV with increasing severity of breast cancer [133]. Although no prospective studies have been conducted, it is possible that MMTV env-like sequences will represent a novel prognostic marker for breast cancer.

With regard to humoral response to MMTV antigens in breast cancer, it was reported that sera from 56 to 137 (40.9%) patients with breast carcinoma were positive for antibodies to MMTV [134,135]. Positive reactivity was also found in sera from five to 27 (18.5%) patients with benign breast disease, in seven out of 60 (11.7%) patients with malignancies other than breast carcinoma, but only in two out of 56 (3.6%) female controls [134]. Antibodies to gp52 have been detected in the sera of 18.6% (27 out of 145) of breast cancer patients in the USA [119], indicating immunoreactivity. One report from Israel showed that gp52 was detectable in 128 out of 204 breast carcinomas tested (62.7%), but the immunological reaction was not detected in normal breast tissue, benign breast tumors, ductal hyperplasia or in other types of cancers. Importantly, the frequency of detection of gp52 was higher in stage IV breast cancer (80%) compared with stage I (15%), suggesting that the gp52 cross-reacting antigen is a useful biomarker to predict the poor prognosis of breast cancer [136,137].

Expert commentary

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women. Despite major advances in its diagnosis and treatment, several major clinical and scientific problems remain unsolved. It is of critical importance to identify genetic alterations responsible for the initiation of malignant transformation of the breast epithelium in order to identify targets for novel drug discovery. Overexpression of HER2/neu, cyclin D1, cyclin E, c-Myc and WNT1, and mutation of Ras have been reported in human breast cancer and, in the case of HER2/neu, cyclin D1, cyclin E and c-Myc, are associated with poor prognosis of patients. In mouse models of human breast cancer, the MMTV-LTR promoter has most frequently been used, and among MMTV LTR-driven mouse models, MMTV-neu/ErbB2, -cyclin D1, -Ras, -Myc and -int-1 models have been especially well studied and characterized. These transgenic models of breast cancer have provided invaluable insights into the molecular mechanisms of breast carcinogenesis and tumor progression.

It was concluded by a panel of experts in mammary gland pathology that these genetically engineered mouse models often develop breast carcinomas that are indistinguishable from human neoplasia. However, there are critical differences between mice and humans. Approximately 50% of human breast cancers are positive for ERα and responsive to estrogen, while tumors that arise in genetically engineered mice are usually ERα-negative and hormone-independent. The exception is MMTV-cyclin D1T286A mice, which are ER-positive. Another issue is that mouse mammary tumors are much less fibroblastic compared with human breast carcinomas (i.e., human mammary glands consist mainly of connective tissue stroma while mouse mammary glands are mainly composed of adipose tissues). Moreover, most mammary gland-induced tumors metastasize to the lung in mice, while breast cancer metastases tend to appear in the lymph nodes, lungs, bones and liver in approximately the same proportion in humans. Since metastatic disease is usually the cause of breast cancer-related death, generation of mouse models that reflect metastatic site preference of human breast cancer remains to be established.

Published studies report detection of the env-like DNA sequence of MMTV in 35–40% of human breast cancer samples but only in 0–2% of normal tissues. Based on these studies, the viral sequence is highly specific to breast cancer and, thus, the MMTV env-like gene could be an excellent molecular marker for breast cancer. Indeed, several studies have shown that the presence of MMTV-like sequences was associated with progesterone receptor, nuclear p53 and advanced clinical stages. However, the frequency of detection of MMTV-like sequences greatly varies from 0 to 100% depending on the specimen, the country where the study is conducted, and the methods used. Scientists have tried PCR followed by Southern blotting, nested PCR or FN-PCR with laser microdissection to detect MMTV env-like and other sequences, but so far there is no general consensus which method is the best for the detection of HMTV in human breast cancer samples. Thus, the establishment of highly sensitive and reproducible methods for HMTV provirus DNA detection is essential to determine the diagnostic values of HMTV in human breast cancer.

Five-year view

Constitutive transgenic mouse models that depend on mammary-specific promoters to control transgene expression provide invaluable information on the signaling pathways involved in breast cancer development. However, they may have limited utility for studying the effect of developmental events on breast cancer risk since the hormonal signals governing these events also influence transgene expression levels. Novel transgenic mouse systems that use the MMTV-LTR to drive expression of the rtTA and the regular tetracycline-dependent transactivator (tTA) have recently been reported and reviewed in this paper [104107,138]. Transgene expression using these tet-controlled systems can be rapidly induced and de-induced, are highly specific to mammary glands and are reproducibly determined over a wide range of expression levels. These tet-controlled systems will be more widely used in the near future to study the effects of oncoprotein expression in mammary glands. Another future direction is the use of the Cre-LoxP1 recombination system. With this system, it has now become possible to delete tumor-suppressor genes selectively in the mammary gland [139,140]. With these techniques, more physiological models of breast cancer will be created within the next 5 years.

Notwithstanding these technical advances, the value of MMTV-LTR-driven mouse models of breast cancer has been re-evaluated since the discovery of MMTV env-like sequences in the DNA from human breast carcinomas, which are typically absent in normal breast tissues or other types of cancers. Although the entire 9.9-kb proviral structure has been clarified for HMTV, cloning of HMTV insertion sites in human carcinomas has not been reported. This can potentially be attributed to the technical difficulties encountered in the associated studies. Identification of HMTV target genes and creation of mouse models for the candidate gene will be essential for understanding the roles of HMTV in human breast carcinogenesis. The prognostic value of MMTV env-like sequences, envelope protein gp52 and LTR superantigen should be determined in a large prospective study since a significant percentage of breast cancers are positive for these markers.

If some human breast cancers have been caused by integration of MMTV-like retrovirus, the tumor cells will exhibit viral antigens both internally and on their surface. As a consequence, viral antigens in tumors will represent a potential antigenic target that is clearly different from normal tissues. As a matter of fact, MMTV-env-like sequences have not been detected in normal tissues. If HMTV is found to possess a bona fide role in human breast cancer development in the near future, the possibility of developing vaccines to prevent infection against such a virus becomes reasonable. This is potentially an extremely exciting discovery that may lead to a reduction in morbidity and mortality from human breast cancers.

Key issues

  • Mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-transgenic mice are invaluable models for human breast cancer.
  • There are three different breast cancer models for neu/ErbB2 mice. They show different latency for tumor development and invasiveness dependent on the gene expressed (mutant or wild-type ErbB2) and on the promoter used (MMTV-LTR or endogenous ErbB2 promoter). Similar to HER2-positive human breast carcinomas, mammary tumorigenesis in mice requires gene amplification and elevated expression of the ErbB2 gene.
  • MMTV-cyclin D1 mice show much longer latency for breast tumor development (~22 months) than MMTV-neu or MMTV-ErbB2 mice, but the tumorigenesis is significantly accelerated in the MMTV-D1T286A strain that expresses stable cyclin D1.
  • LMW cyclin E overexpression strongly selects for spontaneous inactivation of the Arf-p53 pathway in vivo, thereby canceling its protective checkpoint function and accelerating progression to breast cancer.
  • Bitransgenic mice expressing both c-Myc and activated Ras under the control of MMTV-LTR developed focal mammary carcinomas with a dramatically shortened latency period, indicating c-Myc and activated Ras cooperate to accelerate mammary tumor development with pronounced malignancy.
  • The int genes were originally identified as oncogenes activated by the insertion of MMTV in virus-induced mammary adenocarcinomas. MMTV-int-1 transgenic mice exhibit stochastically developed mammary carcinomas, suggesting that additional events are necessary for tumorigenesis.
  • MMTV env-like sequences have been isolated from approximately 38% of human breast cancer DNA, but not in normal breast tissues or other types of carcinomas.
  • A 9.9-kb HMTV provirus with 95% homology to MMTV has been amplified from two human breast cancer samples.
  • MMTV-like LTR superantigen was reported to be present in 42% of human breast cancer, suggesting a role in human breast carcinogenesis.
  • The association of MMTV-like DNA sequences with progesterone receptor, nuclear p53 accumulation suggestive of p53 mutation, and advanced stage of breast cancer indicates that tumors with MMTV-like sequences are associated with hormonal response and prognosis of patients.

Acknowledgments

We thank Elizabeth Fry for technical assistance.

Kazushi Inoue has been supported by NIH/NCI 5R01CA106314, American Cancer Society RSG-07-207- 01-MGO and Wake Forest University Golfers against Cancer grant P30CA12197GAC. Pankaj Taneja is currently supported by the Susan G Komen Foundation postdoctoral fellowship KG080179. Donna P Frazier was supported by the Ruth L Kirschstein National Research Service Award Institutional Research Training Grant (5T32CA079448, F. Torti) from the NIH.

Footnotes

Financial & competing interests disclosure: The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Contributor Information

Pankaj Taneja, Departments of Pathology, and Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

Donna P Frazier, Departments of Pathology, and Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

Robert D Kendig, Departments of Pathology, and Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

Dejan Maglic, Departments of Pathology, Cancer Biology, and Molecular Medicine Graduate Program, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

Takayuki Sugiyama, Departments of Pathology, and Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

Fumitake Kai, Departments of Pathology, and Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

Neetu K Taneja, Departments of Pathology, and Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

Kazushi Inoue, Departments of Pathology, Cancer Biology, and Molecular Medicine Graduate Program, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as:

• of interest

•• of considerable interest

1. Callahan R, Smith GH. MMTV-induced mammary tumorigenesis: gene discovery, progression to malignancy and cellular pathways. Oncogene. 2000;19(8):992–1001. [PubMed]
2. Callahan R, Smith GH. Common integration sites for MMTV in viral induced mouse mammary tumors. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2008;13(3):309–321. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Allred DC, Medina D. The relevance of mouse models to understanding the development and progression of human breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2008;13(3):279–288. [PubMed]
4. Marcotte R, Muller WJ. Signal transductionin transgenic mouse models of human breast cancer-implications for human breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2008;13(3):323–335. [PubMed]
5. Vlahakis G, Heston WE, Smith GH. Strain C3H-A-vy-fB mice: ninety percent incidence of mammary tumors transmitted by either parent. Science. 1970;170(954):185–187. [PubMed]
6. Michalides R, Verstraeten R, Shen FW, Hilgers J. Characterization and chromosomal distribution of endogenous mouse mammary tumor viruses of European mouse strains STS/A and GR/A. Virology. 1985;142(2):278–290. [PubMed]
7. Held W, Acha-Orbea H, MacDonald HR, Waanders GA. Superantigens and retroviral infection: insights from mouse mammary tumor virus. Immunol Today. 1994;15(4):184–190. [PubMed]
8. Ross SR. Mouse mammary tumor virus and its interaction with the immune system. Immunol Res. 1998;17(102):209–216. [PubMed]
9. Nusse R, Varmus HE. Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell. 1982;31(1):99–109. [PubMed]
10. Sherr CJ, McCormick F. The RB and p53 pathways in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2002;2(2):103–112. [PubMed]
Comprehensive review on the RB and p53 pathways.
11. Sherr CJ. Principles of tumor suppression. Cell. 2004;116(2):235–246. [PubMed]
12. Hynes NE, Macdonald G. ErbB receptors and signaling pathways in cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21(2):177–184. [PubMed]
13. Olayioye MA, Neve RM, Lane HA, Hynes NE. The ErbB signaling network: receptor heterodimerization in development and cancer. EMBO J. 2000;19(13):3159–3167. [PubMed]
14. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987;235(4785):177–182. [PubMed]
15. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989;244(4905):707–712. [PubMed]
16. Park JW, Neve RM, Szollosi J, Benz CC. Unraveling the biologic and clinical complexities of HER2. Clin Breast Cancer. 2008;8(5):392–401. [PubMed]
17. Allred DC, Clark GM, Molina R, et al. Overexpression of HER-2/neu and its relationship with other prognostic factors change during the progression of in situ to invasive breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 1992;23(9):974–979. [PubMed]
18. Mansour EG, Ravdin PM, Dressler L. Prognostic factors in early breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1994;74(1 Suppl):381–400. [PubMed]
19. Bargmann CI, Hung MC, Weinberg RA. Multiple independent activations of the neu oncogene by a point mutation altering the transmembrane domain of p185. Cell. 1986;45(5):649–657. [PubMed]
20. Bargmann CI, Hung MC, Weinberg RA. The neu oncogene encodes an epidermal growth factor receptor-related protein. Nature. 1986;319(6050):226–230. [PubMed]
21. Dankort DL, Muller WJ. Signal transduction in mammary tumorigenesis: a transgenic perspective. Oncogene. 2000;19(8):1038–1044. [PubMed]
22. Stern DF, Heffernan PA, Weinberg RA. p185, a product of the neu proto-oncogene, is a receptorlike protein associated with tyrosine kinase activity. Mol Cell Biol. 1986;6(5):1729–1740. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Xie Y, Li K, Hung MC. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc proteins and formation of Shc/Grb2 complex correlate to the transformation of NIH3T3 cells mediated by the point-mutation activated neu. Oncogene. 1995;10(12):2409–2413. [PubMed]
24. Kwong KY, Hung MC. A novel splice variant of HER2 with increased transformation activity. Mol Carcinog. 1998;23(2):62–68. [PubMed]
25. Siegel PM, Ryan ED, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ. Elevated expression of activated forms of Neu/ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 are involved in the induction of mammary tumors in transgenic mice: implications for human breast cancer. EMBO J. 1999;18(8):2149–2164. [PubMed]
26. Muller WJ, Sinn E, Pattengale PK, Wallace R, Leder P. Single-step induction of mammary adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice bearing the activated c-neu oncogene. Cell. 1988;54(1):105–115. [PubMed]••
First report on MMTV-neumice.
27. Bouchard L, Lamarre L, Tremblay PJ, Jolicoeur P. Stochastic appearance of mammary tumors in transgenic mice carrying the MMTV/c-neu oncogene. Cell. 1989;57(6):931–936. [PubMed]
28. Guy CT, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ. Activated neu induces rapid tumor progression. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(13):7673–7678. [PubMed]
29. Siegel PM, Dankort DL, Hardy WR, Muller WJ. Novel activating mutations in the neu proto-oncogene involved in induction of mammary tumors. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14(11):7068–7077. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Siegel PM, Muller WJ. Mutations affecting conserved cysteine residues within the extracellular domain of Neu promote receptor dimerization and activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93(17):8878–8883. [PubMed]
31. Guy CT, Webster MA, Schaller M, Parsons TJ, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ. Expression of the neu protooncogene in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice induces metastatic disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89(22):10578–10582. [PubMed]
32. Li B, Rosen JM, McMenamin-Balano J, Muller WJ, Perkins AS. neu/ERBB2 cooperates with p53–172H during mammary tumorigenesis in transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(6):3155–3163. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. D'Amico M, Wu K, Di Vizio D, et al. The role of Ink4a/Arf in ErbB2 mammary gland tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2003;63(12):3395–3402. [PubMed]
34. Andrechek ER, Hardy WR, Siegel PM, Rudnicki MA, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ. Amplification of the neu/erbB-2 oncogene in a mouse model of mammary tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(7):3444–3449. [PubMed]
35. Montagna C, andrechek ER, Padilla-Nash H, Muller WJ, Ried T. Centrosome abnormalities, recurring deletions of chromosome 4 and genomic amplification of HER2/neu define mouse mammary gland adenocarcinomas induced by mutant HER2/neu. Oncogene. 2002;21(6):890–898. [PubMed]
36. Andrechek ER, Laing MA, Girgis-Gabardo AA, Siegel PM, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ. Gene expression profiling of neu-induced mammary tumors from transgenic mice reveals genetic and morphological similarities to ErbB2-expressing human breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2003;63(16):4920–4926. [PubMed]
37. Fantl V, Edwards PA, Steel JH, Vonderhaar BK, Dickson C. Impaired mammary gland development in Cyl-1(-/-) mice during pregnancy and lactation is epithelial cell autonomous. Dev Biol. 1999;212(1):1–11. [PubMed]
38. Sutherland RL, Musgrove EA. Cyclins and breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2004;9(1):95–104. [PubMed]
39. Arnold A, Papanikolaou A. Cyclin D1 in breast cancer pathogenesis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(18):4215–4224. [PubMed]
40. Gillett C, Smith P, Gregory W, et al. Cyclin D1 and prognosis in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 1996;69(2):92–99. [PubMed]
41. Hwang TS, Han HS, Hong YC, Lee HJ, Paik NS. Prognostic value of combined analysis of cyclin D1 and estrogen receptor status in breast cancer patients. Pathol Int. 2003;53(2):74–80. [PubMed]
42. Bièche I, Olivi M, Noguès C, Vidaud M, Lidereau R. Prognostic value of CCND1 gene status in sporadic breast tumours, as determined by real-time quantitative PCR assays. Br J Cancer. 2002;86(4):580–586. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Wang TC, Cardiff RD, Zukerberg L, Lees E, Arnold A, Schmidt EV. Mammary hyperplasia and carcinoma in MMTV-cyclin D1 transgenic mice. Nature. 1994;369(6482):669–671. [PubMed]
First report on MMTV-cyclin D1 mice.
44. Lin DI, Lessie MD, Gladden AB, Bassing CH, Wagner KU, Diehl JA. Disruption of cyclin D1 nuclear export and proteolysis accelerates mammary carcinogenesis. Oncogene. 2008;27(9):1231–1242. [PubMed]
45. Radeva G, Petrocelli T, Behrend E, et al. Overexpression of the integrin-linked kinase promotes anchorage-independent cell cycle progression. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(21):13937–13944. [PubMed]
46. Yu Q, Geng Y, Sicinski P. Specific protection against breast cancers by cyclin D1 ablation. Nature. 2001;411(6841):1017–1021. [PubMed]
47. Yu Q, Sicinska E, Geng Y, et al. Requirement for CDK4 kinase function in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2006;9(1):23–32. [PubMed]
Dependence of MMTV-neu and MMTV-Ras breast carcinogenesis on cyclin D1.
48. Corsino PE, Davis BJ, Nørgaard PH, et al. Mammary tumors initiated by constitutive Cdk2 activation contain an invasive basal-like component. Neoplasia. 2008;10(11):1240–1252. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Ekholm-Reed S, Mendez J, Tedesco D, Zetterberg A, Stillman B, Reed SI. Deregulation of cyclin E in human cells interferes with prereplication complex assembly. J Cell Biol. 2004;165(6):789–800. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Geng Y, Yu Q, Sicinska E, et al. Cyclin E ablation in the mouse. Cell. 2003;114(4):431–443. [PubMed]
51. Spruck CH, Won KA, Reed SI. Deregulated cyclin E induces chromosome instability. Nature. 1999;401(6750):297–300. [PubMed]
52. Bortner DM, Rosenberg MP. Induction of mammary gland hyperplasia and carcinomas in transgenic mice expressing human cyclin E. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(1):453–459. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Akli S, Zheng PJ, Multani AS, et al. Tumor-specific low molecular weight forms of cyclin E induce genomic instability and resistance to p21, p27 and antiestrogens in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64(9):3198–3208. [PubMed]
54. Keyomarsi K, Pardee AB. Redundant cyclin overexpression and gene amplification in breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(3):1112–1116. [PubMed]
55. Keyomarsi K, O'Leary N, Molnar G, Lees E, Fingert HJ, Pardee AB. Cyclin E, a potential prognostic marker for breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1994;54(2):380–385. [PubMed]
56. Keyomarsi K, Conte D, Jr, Toyofuku W, Fox MP. Deregulation of cyclin E in breast cancer. Oncogene. 1995;11(5):941–950. [PubMed]
57. Keyomarsi K, Tucker SL, Buchholz TA, et al. Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(20):1566–1575. [PubMed]
58. Akli S, Van Pelt CS, Bui T, et al. Overexpression of the low molecular weight cyclin E in transgenic mice induces metastatic mammary carcinomas through the disruption of the ARF-p53 pathway. Cancer Res. 2007;67(15):7212–7222. [PubMed]
59. Bos JL. ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review. Cancer Res. 1989;49(17):4682–4689. [PubMed]
60. McCormick F. Signal transduction. How receptors turn Ras on. Nature. 1993;363(6424):15–16. [PubMed]
61. Downward J. Cell cycle: routine role for Ras. Curr Biol. 1997;7(4):R258–260. [PubMed]
62. Cox AD, Der CJ. Ras family signaling: therapeutic targeting. Cancer Biother. 2002;1(6):599–606. [PubMed]
63. Rodriguez-Viciana P, Tetsu O, Oda K, Okada J, Rauen K, McCormick F. Cancer targets in the Ras pathway. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2005;70:461–467. [PubMed]
64. Sinn E, Muller W, Pattengale P, Tepler I, Wallace R, Leder P. Coexpression of MMTV/v-Ha-ras and MMTV/c-myc genes in transgenic mice: synergistic action of oncogenes in vivo. Cell. 1987;49(4):465–475. [PubMed]
Ras and Myc collaboration in MMTV breast cancer models.
65. Hundley JE, Koester SK, Troyer DA, Hilsenbeck SG, Subler MA, Windle JJ. Increased tumor proliferation and genomic instability without decreased apoptosis in MMTV-ras mice deficient in p53. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(2):723–731. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Donehower LA, Harvey M, Slagle BL, et al. Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature. 1992;356(6366):215–221. [PubMed]
67. Adnane J, Jackson RJ, Nicosia SV, Cantor AB, Pledger WJ, Sebti SM. Loss of p21WAF1/CIP1 accelerates Ras oncogenesis in a transgenic/knockout mammary cancer model. Oncogene. 2000;19(47):5338–5347. [PubMed]
68. Missero C, Di Cunto F, Kiyokawa H, Koff A, Dotto GP. The absence of p21Cip1/WAF1 alters keratinocyte growth and differentiation and promotes ras-tumor progression. Genes Dev. 1996;10(23):3065–3075. [PubMed]
69. Bearss DJ, Lee RJ, Troyer DA, Pestell RG, Windle JJ. Differential effects of p21(WAF1/CIP1) deficiency on MMTV-ras and MMTV-myc mammary tumor properties. Cancer Res. 2002;62(7):2077–2084. [PubMed]
70. Amati B, Frank SR, Donjerkovic D, Taubert S. Function of the c-Myc oncoprotein in chromatin remodeling and transcription. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1471(3):M135–145. [PubMed]
71. Eisenman RN. Deconstructing myc. Genes Dev. 2001;15(16):2023–2030. [PubMed]
72. Takayama M, Taira T, Iguchi-Ariga SM, Ariga H. CDC6 interacts with c-Myc to inhibit E-box-dependent transcription by abrogating c-Myc/Max complex. FEBS Lett. 2000;477(1–2):43–48. [PubMed]
73. Al-Kuraya K, Schraml P, Torhorst J, et al. Prognostic relevance of gene amplifications and coamplifications in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64(23):8534–8540. [PubMed]
74. Stewart TA, Pattengale PK, Leder P. Spontaneous mammary adenocarcinomas in transgenic mice that carry and express MTV/myc fusion genes. Cell. 1984;38(3):627–637. [PubMed]
75. Schoenenberger CA, andres AC, Groner B, van der Valk M, LeMeur M, Gerlinger P. Targeted c-myc gene expression in mammary glands of transgenic mice induces mammary tumours with constitutive milk protein gene transcription. EMBO J. 1988;7(1):169–175. [PubMed]
76. Soengas MS, Alarcón RM, Yoshida H, et al. Apaf-1 and caspase-9 in p53-dependent apoptosis and tumor inhibition. Science. 1999;284(5411):156–159. [PubMed]
77. Coldwell MJ, Mitchell SA, Stoneley M, MacFarlane M, Willis AE. Initiation of Apaf-1 translation by internal ribosome entry. Oncogene. 2000;19(7):899–905. [PubMed]
78. Ray D, Terao Y, Fuhrken PG, et al. Deregulated CDC25A expression promotes mammary tumorigenesis with genomic instability. Cancer Res. 2007;67(3):984–991. [PubMed]
79. Galaktionov K, Chen X, Beach D. Cdc25 cell-cycle phosphatase as a target of c-myc. Nature. 1996;382(6591):511–517. [PubMed]
80. LaBaer J, Garrett MD, Stevenson LF, et al. New functional activities for the p21 family of CDK inhibitors. Genes Dev. 1997;11(7):847–862. [PubMed]
81. Cheng M, Olivier P, Diehl JA, et al. The p21(Cip1) and p27(Kip1) CDK ‘inhibitors’ are essential activators of cyclin D-dependent kinases in murine fibroblasts. EMBO J. 1999;18(6):1571–1583. [PubMed]
82. McCormack SJ, Weaver Z, Deming S, et al. Myc/p53 interactions in transgenic mouse mammary development, tumorigenesis and chromosomal instability. Oncogene. 1998;16(21):2755–2766. [PubMed]
83. Katoh M. WNT and FGF gene clusters (review) Int J Oncol. 2002;21(6):1269–1273. [PubMed]
84. Clevers H. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell. 2006;127(3):469–480. [PubMed]
Comprehensive review on Wnt/β-catenin signaling.
85. Chien AJ, Conrad WH, Moon RT. A Wnt survival guide: from flies to human disease. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129(7):1614–1627. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
86. Nusse R. The int genes in mammary tumorigenesis and in normal development. Trends Genet. 1988;4(10):291–295. [PubMed]
87. Dickson C, Fantl V. Fgf-3, an oncogene in murine breast cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 1994;71:331–343. [PubMed]
88. Howe LR, Brown AMC. Wnt signaling and breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2004;3(1):36–41. [PubMed]
89. Klarmann GJ, Decker A, Farrar WL. Epigenetic gene silencing in the Wnt pathway in breast cancer. Epigenetics. 2008;3(2):59–63. [PubMed]
90. Lin SY, Xia W, Wang JC, et al. β-catenin, a novel prognostic marker for breast cancer: its roles in cyclin D1 expression and cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(8):4262–4266. [PubMed]
91. Ryo A, Nakamura M, Wulf G, Liou YC, Lu KP. Pin1 regulates turnover and subcellular localization of β-catenin by inhibiting its interaction with APC. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(9):793–801. [PubMed]
92. Nusse R, van Ooyen A, Cox D, Fung YK, Varmus H. Mode of proviral activation of a putative mammary oncogene (int-1) on mouse chromosome 15. Nature. 1984;307(5947):131–136. [PubMed]
93. Tsukamoto AS, Grosschedl R, Guzman RC, Parslow T, Varmus HE. Expression of the int-1 gene in transgenic mice is associated with mammary gland hyperplasia and adenocarcinomas in male and female mice. Cell. 1988;55(4):619–625. [PubMed]
94. Shackleford GM, MacArthur CA, Kwan HC, Varmus HE. Mouse mammary tumor virus infection accelerates mammary carcinogenesis in Wnt1 transgenic mice by insertional activation of int-2/Fgf-3 and hst/Fgf-4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(2):740–744. [PubMed]
95. Donehower LA, Godley LA, Aldaz CM, et al. Deficiency of p53 accelerates mammary tumorigenesis in Wnt-1 transgenic mice and promotes chromosomal instability. Genes Dev. 1995;9(7):882–895. [PubMed]
96. Rowlands TM, Pechenkina IV, Hatsell SJ, Pestell RG, Cowin P. Dissecting the roles of β-catenin and cyclin D1 during mammary development and neoplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(20):11400–11405. [PubMed]
97. Jhappan C, Gallahan D, Stahle C, et al. Expression of an activated Notch-Related int-3 transgene interferes with cell differentiation and induces neoplastic transformation in mammary and salivary glands. Genes Dev. 1992;6(3):345–355. [PubMed]
98. Callahan R, Raafat A. Notch signaling in mammary gland tumorigenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2001;6(1):23–36. [PubMed]
99. Shi W, Harris AL. Notch signaling in breast cancer and tumor angiogenesis: cross-talk and therapeutic potentials. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2006;11(1):41–52. [PubMed]
100. Sovak MA, Arsura M, Zanieski G, Kavanagh KT, Sonenshein GE. The inhibitory effects of transforming growth factor beta1 on breast cancer cell proliferation are mediated through regulation of aberrant nuclear factor-κB/Rel expression. Cell Growth Differ. 1999;10(8):537–544. [PubMed]
101. Cogswell PC, Guttridge DC, Funkhouser WK, Baldwin AS., Jr Selective activation of NF-κB subunits in human breast cancer: potential roles for NF-κB2/p52 and for Bcl-3. Oncogene. 2000;19(9):1123–1131. [PubMed]
102. Romieu-Mourez R, Kim DW, Shin SM, et al. Mouse mammary tumor virus c-rel transgenic mice develop mammary tumors. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(16):5738–5754. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
103. Shin SR, Sánchez-Velar N, Sherr DH, Sonenshein GE. 7,12-dimethylbenz(a) anthracene treatment of a c-rel mouse mammary tumor cell line induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition via activation of nuclear factor-κB. Cancer Res. 2006;66(5):2570–2575. [PubMed]
104. Gunther EJ, Belka GK, Wertheim GB, et al. A novel doxycycline-inducible system for the transgenic analysis of mammary gland biology. FASEB J. 2002;16(3):283–292. [PubMed]
First report on doxorubicin-inducible MMTV transgenic model.
105. Moody SE, Sarkisian CJ, Hahn KT, et al. Conditional activation of Neu in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice results in reversible pulmonary metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2002;2(6):451–461. [PubMed]
106. Gunther EJ, Moody SE, Belka GK, et al. Impact of p53 loss on reversal and recurrence of conditional Wnt-induced tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2003;17(4):488–501. [PubMed]
107. Sarkisian CJ, Keister BA, Stairs DB, Boxer RB, Moody SE, Chodosh LA. Dose-dependent oncogene-induced senescence in vivo and its evasion during mammary tumorigenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9(5):493–505. [PubMed]
108. Davie SA, Maglione JE, Manner CK, et al. Effects of FVB/NJ and C57Bl/6J strain backgrounds on mammary tumor phenotype in inducible nitric oxide synthase deficient mice. Transgenic Res. 2007;16(2):193–201. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
109. Mahler JF, Stokes W, Mann PC, Takaoka M, Maronpot RR. Spontaneous lesions in aging FVB/N mice. Toxicol Pathol. 1996;24(6):710–716. [PubMed]
110. Rowse GJ, Ritland SR, Gendler SJ. Genetic Modulation of neu proto-oncogene-induced mammary tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 1998;58(12):2675–2679. [PubMed]
111. Mikaelian I, Blades N, Churchill GA, et al. Proteotypic classification of spontaneous and transgenic mammary neoplasms. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(6):R668–R679. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
112. Durgam VR, Tekmal RR. The nature and expression of int-5, a novel MMTV integration locus gene in carcinogen-induced mammary tumors. Cancer Lett. 1994;87(2):179–186. [PubMed]
113. Bui TD, Rankin J, Smith K, et al. A novel human Wnt gene, WNT10B, maps to 12q13 and is expressed in human breast carcinomas. Oncogene. 1997;14(10):1249–1253. [PubMed]
114. Theodorou V, Kimm MA, Boer M, et al. MMTV insertional mutagenesis identifies genes, gene families and pathways involved in mammary cancer. Nat Genet. 2007;39(6):759–769. [PubMed]
115. Axel R, Schlom J, Spiegelman S. Presence in human breast cancer of RNA homologous to mouse mammary tumour virus RNA. Nature. 1972;235(5332):32–36. [PubMed]
116. Levine PH, Mesa-Tejada R, Keydar I, Tabbane F, Spiegelman S, Mourali N. Increased incidence of mouse mammary tumor virus-related antigen in Tunisian patients with breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 1984;33(3):305–308. [PubMed]
117. Litvinov SV, Golovkina TV. Expression of proteins immunologically related to murine mammary tumour virus (MMTV) core proteins in the cells of breast cancer continuous lines MCF-7, T47D, MDA-231 and cells from human milk. Acta Virol. 1989;33(2):137–142. [PubMed]
118. Zotter S, Kemmer C, Lossnitzer A, Grossmann H, Johannsen BA. Mouse mammary tumour virus-related antigens in core-like density fractions from large samples of women's milk. Eur J Cancer. 1980;16(4):455–467. [PubMed]
119. Day NK, Witkin SS, Sarkar NH, et al. Antibodies reactive with murine mammary tumor virus in sera of patients with breast cancer: geographic and family studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78(4):2483–2487. [PubMed]
120. Witkin SS, Sarkar NH, Kinne DW, Breed CN, Good RA, Day NK. Antigens and antibodies cross-reactive to the murine mammary tumor virus in human breast cyst fluids. J Clin Invest. 1981;67(1):216–222. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
121. Keydar I, Ohno T, Nayak R, et al. Properties of retrovirus-like particles produced by a human breast carcinoma cell line: immunological relationship with mouse mammary tumor virus proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81(13):4188–4192. [PubMed]
122. Wang Y, Holland JF, Bleiweiss IJ. et al. Detection of mammary tumor virus env gene-like sequences in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1995;55(22):5173–5179. [PubMed]••
Analysis of 314 cases of breast cancer for MMTV-env-like sequences.
123. Etkind P, Du J, Khan A, Pillitteri J, Wiernik PH. Mouse mammary tumor virus-like ENV gene sequences in human breast tumors and in a lymphoma of a breast cancer patient. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6(4):1273–1278. [PubMed]
124. Amarante MK, Watanabe MA. The possible involvement of virus in breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009;135(3):329–337. [PubMed]
125. Zammarchi F, Pistello M, Piersigilli A, et al. MMTV-like sequences in human breast cancer: a fluorescent PCR/laser microdissection approach. J Pathol. 2006;209(4):436–444. [PubMed]
126. Liu B, Wang Y, Melana SM, et al. Identification of a proviral structure in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61(4):1754–1759. [PubMed]
Characterization of the 9.9-kb genomic structure of HMTV.
127. Wang Y, Jiang JD, Xu D, et al. A mouse mammary tumor virus-like long terminal repeat superantigen in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64(12):4105–4111. [PubMed]
MMTV-LTR superantigen in human breast cancer.
128. Lawson JS, Tran DD, Carpenter E, et al. Presence of mouse mammary tumour-like virus gene sequences may be associated with morphology of specific human breast cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59(12):1287–1292. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
129. Etkind PR, Stewart AF, Wiernik PH. Mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-like DNA sequences in the breast tumors of father, mother and daughter. Infect Agent Cancer. 2008;3(2):1–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
130. Wang Y, Melana SM, Baker B, et al. High prevalence of MMTV-like env gene sequences in gestational breast cancer. Med Oncol. 2003;20(3):233–236. [PubMed]
131. Faedo M, Ford CE, Mehta R, Blazek K, Rawlinson WD. Mouse mammary tumor-like virus is associated with p53 nuclear accumulation and progesterone receptor positivity but not estrogen positivity in human female breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(13):4417–4419. [PubMed]
MMTV-like virus and prognosis of human breast cancer.
132. Langerød A, Zhao H, Borgan Ø, et al. TP53 mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(3):R30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
133. Ford CE, Faedo M, Crouch R, Lawson JS, Rawlinson WD. Progression from normal breast pathology to breast cancer is associated with increasing prevalence of mouse mammary tumor virus-like sequences in men and women. Cancer Res. 2004;64(14):4755–4759. [PubMed]
134. Witkin SS, Sarkar NH, Kinne DW, Good RA, Day NK. Antibodies reactive with the mouse mammary tumor virus in sera of breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 1980;25(6):721–725. [PubMed]
135. Tomana M, Kajdos AH, Niedermeier W, Durkin WJ, Mestecky J. Antibodies to mouse mammary tumor virus-related antigen in sera of patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1981;47(11):2696–2703. [PubMed]
136. Keydar I, Selzer G, Chaitchik S, Hareuveni M, Karby S, Hizi A. A viral antigen as a marker for the prognosis of human breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1982;18(12):1321–1328. [PubMed]
137. Chaitchik S, Kabakow B, De Chabon A, et al. Prognostic factors in breast cancer – a pathological and immunological study of patients with stage 1 breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1987;13(6):499–504. [PubMed]
138. Tilli MT, Frech MS, Steed ME, et al. Introduction of estrogen receptor-α into the tTA/TAg conditional mouse model precipitates the development of estrogen-responsive mammary adenocarcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2003;163(5):1713–1719. [PubMed]
139. Wagner KU, Wall RJ, St-Onge L, et al. Cre-mediated gene deletion in the mammary gland. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(21):4323–4330. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
140. Dourdin N, Schade B, Lesurf R, et al. Phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 deficiency accelerates tumor induction in a mouse model of ErbB-2 mammary tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2008;68(7):2122–2131. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
141. Roussel MF, Theodoras AM, Pagano M, Sherr CJ. Rescue of defective mitogenic signaling by D-type cyclins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(15):6837–6841. [PubMed]
142. Inoue K, Roussel MF, Sherr CJ. Induction of ARF tumor suppressor gene expression and cell cycle arrest by transcription factor DMP1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(7):3993–3998. [PubMed]
143. Inoue K, Wen R, Rehg JE, et al. Disruption of the ARF transcriptional activator DMP1 facilitates cell immortalization, Ras transformation and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2000;14(14):1797–1809. [PubMed]
144. Inoue K, Zindy F, Randle DH, Rehg JE, Sherr CJ. Dmp1 is haplo-insufficient for tumor suppression and modifies the frequencies of Arf and p53 mutations in Myc-induced lymphomas. Genes Dev. 2001;15(22):2934–2939. [PubMed]
145. Inoue K, Mallakin A, Frazier DP. Dmp1 and tumor suppression (Review) Oncogene. 2007;26(30):4329–4335. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
146. Sreeramaneni R, Chaudhry A, McMahon M, Sherr CJ, Inoue K. Ras-Raf-Arf signaling critically depends on Dmp1 transcription factor. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(1):220–232. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
147. Mallakin A, Taneja P, Matise LA, Willingham MC, Inoue K. Expression of Dmp1 in specific differentiated, nonproliferating cells and its repression by E2Fs. Oncogene. 2006;25(59):7703–7713. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
148. Taneja P, Mallakin A, Matise LA, Frazier DP, Choudhary M, Inoue K. Repression of Dmp1 and Arf transcription by anthracyclins: critical roles of the NF-κB subunit p65. Oncogene. 2007;26(33):7457–7466. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
149. Mallakin A, Sugiyama T, Taneja P, et al. Mutually exclusive inactivation of DMP1 and ARF/p53 in lung cancer. Cancer Cell. 2007;12(4):381–394. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
150. Sugiyama T, Taneja P, Frazier DP, et al. Oncogenic and non-oncogenic signaling pathways that regulate Dmp1 (Dmtf1) Clin Med Oncol. 2008;2:1–11.
151. Sugiyama T, Frazier DP, Taneja P, Morgan RL, Willingham MC, Inoue K. Role of DMP1 and its future in lung cancer diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2008;8(4):435–447. [PubMed]