PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Transpl Immunol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 June 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2757551
NIHMSID: NIHMS128148

COAGULATION DYSREGULATION AS A BARRIER TO XENOTRANSPLANTATION IN THE PRIMATE

Abstract

Purpose of review

The ability to generate pigs expressing a human complement regulatory protein (hCRP) and/or pigs in which the α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene has been knocked out (GT-KO) has largely overcome the barrier of hyperacute rejection of a pig organ transplanted into a primate. However, acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHXR), presenting as microvascular thrombosis and/or consumptive coagulopathy, remains a major hurdle to successful xenotransplantation. This review summarizes recent studies of the coagulation problems associated with xenotransplantation, and discusses potential strategies to overcome them.

Recent progress

Organ transplantation into nonhuman primates from GT-KO pigs that express a hCRP are not susceptible to hyperacute rejection. Nevertheless, most recipients of GT-KO and/or hCRP transgenic pig organs develop a consumptive coagulopathy, even when the graft remains functioning. This is associated with platelet aggregation, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and a tendency to bleed. Whilst this may reflect an ongoing immune response against the graft, (as exposure to anti-nonGal antibodies in vitro induces procoagulant changes in porcine ECs, even in the absence of complement), histological examination of the graft often shows only minimal features of immune injury, unlike grafts undergoing typical AHXR. Importantly, recent in vitro studies have indicated that the coincubation of porcine endothelial cells (ECs) with human platelets activates the platelets to express tissue factor, independent of a humoral immune response. These observations suggest that the use of organs from GT-KO pigs that express a hCRP may not be sufficient to prevent the development of a coagulation disorder following xenotransplantation, even if complete immunological tolerance can be achieved.

Summary

Both thrombotic microangiopathy and systemic consumptive coagulopathy are increasingly recognized as barriers to successful xenotransplantation. The breeding of transgenic pigs with one or more human anticoagulant genes, such as CD39 or tissue factor pathway inhibitor, is anticipated to inhibit the procoagulant changes that take place on the graft ECs, and thus may prevent or reduce platelet activation that arises as a result of immune-mediated injury. The identification of the molecular mechanisms that develop between porcine ECs and human platelets may allow pharmacological approaches to be determined that inhibit the development of thrombotic microangiopathy and consumptive coagulopathy. Hopefully, further genetic modification of the organ-source pigs, combined with systemic drug therapy to the recipient, will prolong graft survival further.

Keywords: Xenotransplantation, Coagulation, Platelets, Pig, Primate

1. INTRODUCTION

Xenotransplantation promises an unlimited supply of organs for clinical use. Pigs are thought to be the most suitable source of xenografts [1, 2]. Although several strategies have been developed to overcome hyperacute rejection (HAR) and thus prolong graft survival [2], acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHXR) ensues with manifestations of fibrin deposition within the vasculature of grafts, platelet sequestration, and monocyte infiltration, which leads to intravascular thrombosis, which has proven very difficult to prevent or treat.

Extensive evidence has supported the view that thrombosis leads to the loss of both whole organ and islet xenografts in the pig-to-primate model. However, the exact mechanism by which coagulation disorders are induced after xenotransplantation remain uncertain. Coagulation is initiated by damage to blood vessel endothelium and the expression of tissue factor (TF) . TF binds factor VII (FVII) to trigger the formation of thrombin. A trickle of thrombin, which can activate many cells, such as monocytes, platelets, neutrophils and ECs independently of thrombosis, also amplifies multiple feedback loops, propagating the generation of large amounts of thrombin which cleaves fibrinogen to form a fibrin thrombus [3] .

Until now, it has been considered that thrombosis results from antibody- and complement-mediated EC activation, initiating AHXR. Exposure of porcine ECs to xenoantibodies, complement, and cells of the innate immune system results in EC activation and loss of anticoagulant regulators on their surface, with a subsequent change to a procoagulant phenotype. These same processes are also active in the humoral rejection of allogeneic organs after HLA-mismatched or ABO-incompatible transplantation. As in allogeneic organ transplantation, humoral rejection of xenografts can also cause a systemic coagulopathy associated with the consumption of coagulation proteases, platelets and fibrinogen within the graft.

Importantly, in xeno- but not allo-transplantation, there are distinct, immune-independent factors that contribute to the development of coagulation disorders, e.g., molecular incompatiblities between pigs and primates that promote, or fail to regulate, pathological clotting. For example, in the initiation stage of thrombosis, porcine von Willebrand Factor (vWF) spontaneously aggregates human platelets, in the absence of shear stress, through aberrant interaction between the O-glycosylated A1 domain and platelet glycoprotein Ib [4]. In addition, during propagation, human thrombomodulin inefficiently regulates the primate coagulation cascade [57]. Traditionally, porcine tissue facotr pathway inhibitor (TFPI) has been thought inefficient at regulating human TF clotting initiation [8], but this view has been challenged recently [9]. We have just described a novel immune-independent mechanism, whereby human platelets are spontaneously activated to express procoagulant TF after physical interaction with porcine EC, independently of the presence of xenoreactive antibodies or complement (Lin et al. Transplantation, 2008, in press).

The precise importance of thrombin generation during the humoral rejection process has been highlighted recently by studies in small animal models. In a mouse-to-rat model, Chen et al. reported that hearts from transgenic mice expressing human TFPI or hirudin demonstrated prolonged survival in the absence of immunosuppressive therapy, compared to wild-type mouse hearts. More importantly, hTFPI-transgenic mouse hearts survived indefinitely in immunosuppresed rats [10]. No features of AHXR were identified histologically in spite of antibody and complement deposition on the ECs. Similarly, Mendicino et al., working in the same model, reported that wild-type grafts developed typical features of AHXR within 3 days, associated with increased levels of donor fgl-2 mRNA. In contrast, grafts from fgl-2-knockout mice had remarkedly reduced thrombosis and fibrin deposition, but developed a cellular response that was inhibited by treatment by immunosuppressants [11]. These observations, although differing in the emphasis they place on TF-dependent initiation of clotting, nevertheless highlight that in the absence of thrombin generation, humoral rejection mechanisms are significantly impaired, despite antibody and complement deposition on graft ECs. Recent work from our group has indicated that this may relate to the critical role of thrombin, through protease activated receptor signaling, for leukocyte recruitment and activation [12].

Several aritcles have recently reviewed coagulation issues in xenotransplantation[1316]. In the present review, we shall 1) review the coagulation disorders associated with solid organ xenotransplantation, 2) describe recent progress in in vitro and animal studies, 3) review the potential role of recipient platelets, which may contribute to coagulation dysregulation, and 4) propose some strategies to inhibit coagulation disorder durning xenotransplantation.

2. COAGULATION DISORDERS IN PIG-TO-PRIMATE SOLID ORGAN MODELS OF XENOTRANSPLANTATION

In the absence of immunosuppressive therapy, baboons rejected kidneys from triple transgenic pigs expressing human complement-regulatory proteins (hCRPs) within about 5 days, and developed a consumptive coagulopathy (CC) with the features of profound thrombocytopenia, fibrinogen depletion, and consequently increased clotting times[17, 18]. Pharmacologic immunosuppression, depletion of anti-Gal antibodies, and combined kidneythymus transplantation prolonged renal xenograft survival, but did not prevent the development of a thrombotic microangiopathy in the glomeruli [19]. The use of organs from α1,3-galactosyltransferese gene knock-out (GT-KO) pigs in a pig kidney-to-primate model had little benefit in preventing coagulation when elicited antibodies to nonGal antigens developed; AHXR occurred with graft failure and associated thrombocytopenia [20]. However, vigorous control of the induced humoral response prolonged GTKO pig kidney graft survival and reduced the extent of thrombosis, although at the expense of increased infectious complications [21].

These observations suggest that in these studies the development of coagulation disorders occurred mainly as a consequence of the rejection response, probably as a result of antibody-mediated or immune cell-mediated activation of porcine ECs, with loss of anticoagulant characteristics that promoted the local graft thrombosis and systemic consumptive coagulopathy (CC) (see below).

Transplanting hearts from GT-KO pigs [22] into baboons prolonged median graft survival to 78 days, but eventually all grafts succumbed to ischemic necrosis associated with the development of TM [23, 24]. The histopathology in these grafts was different from typical AHXR. There was focal immunoglobulin and complement deposition, but neither preformed antibody against nonGal epitopes nor an elicited antibody response could be detected. Additionally, the grafts revealed microvascular thrombosis in arterioles, capillaries, and venules, with only rare interstitial mononuclear cells. The mixed lymphocyte reaction remained unresponsive, suggesting that the changes seen resulted from low-grade humoral rejection.

The concept that regulatory mechanisms on ECs play a critical role in determining the sensititivity of organs to humoral rejection has been demonstrated in a mouse model of complement-dependent rejection by Shimizu et al [25], so we postulate that the same applies in this setting for coagulation regulatory mechanisms; i.e. aspects of porcine ECs that promote or fail to regulate primate coagulation are responsible for sensitizing the graft to rejection by an otherwise ‘innocuous’ immune response.

3. RECENT PROGRESS

3.1 GT-KO with CD46 transgenic pigs

More recently, pigs expressing a hCRP gene, e.g., CD46 or hDAF, on a GT-KO pig background have been bred. The transplantation of kidneys from these pigs into nonhuman primates has recently been reported [26] . Failure of these grafts was not associated with the classical features of AHXR, but the recipient succumbed to the development of CC, with platelet aggregation, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and a bleeding tendency, but with a functioning graft.

The results of our own group are similar; histopathologic features show only minimal IgM deposition without deposition of IgG and complement, and no infiltration of macrophages, B, or T cells. However, fibrin is indeed deposited in the grafts. This observation suggests that GT-KO pigs expressing a hCRP gene provide some protection against the humoral-mediated immune response, but do not overcome the problems of coagulation. Moreover, the development of CC does not necessarily correlate with the severity of humoral rejection.

3.2 Anti-nonGal antibodies

Since GT-KO pigs were introduced to eliminate the antibody response to Gal, interest has been directed towards anti-nonGal antibodies. A recent in vitro study showed that ECs from GT-KO pigs additionally transgenic for CD46 were more resistant to primate complement-dependent cytotoxicity than those from GT-KO pigs (Hara et al, Transpl Int, 2008, in press). It was therefore anticipated that GT-KO pigs expressing a hCRP protected against a lower level of cytotoxicity associated with anti-nonGal antibodies. However, when considering EC activation rather than cytotoxicity, recent evidence indicates that anti-nonGal antibodies of both human and nonhuman primates [27, 28] act through complement-independent pathways. Our in vitro results demonstrate that porcine ECs from CD46-transgenic pigs are resistant to activation by naïve baboon serum, but not to sera from baboons sensitized to nonGal antigens or to sera from baboons or humans with high levels of anti-nonGal antibodies. This implies that hCRP transgenic pigs alone may be insufficient to completely prevent the development of procoagulant changes on porcine ECs induced by primate serum.

One solution would be to identify one or more significant nonGal antigen against which natural antibodies are present in primates. However, it is a formidable task to identify significant nonGal antigens, and proceed to genetically modify pigs by KO of the gene for the antigen. A more reasonable approach is to generate GT-KO pigs that express anti-coagulant genes to prevent the development of a procoagulant phenotype when porcine ECs are activated, regardless of the presence of nonGal antigens.

3.3 Role of platelets

The interactions between porcine ECs, platelets, and other blood cells are at the nexus of a complex network that contributes to coagulation during AHXR (Figure 1). According to the standard paradigm, the process is initiated by the immune response against the graft, such that activation of porcine ECs caused by antibodies with/without complement leads to expression of TF that triggers the coagulation cascade [29, 30]. Together with loss of anticoagulant regulators, such as TFPI, thrombomodulin, or heparan sulfate, or through fgl-2 conversion [8, 31], thrombin and fibrin are deposited in the graft. This process intrinsically involves potent platelet activation. At the same time, the loss of ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1 (CD39) and ecto-5’-nucleotidases (CD73), which catalyzes the degradation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and monophosphate (AMP) to adenosine has been documented on activated ECs [32, 33]. Failure of enzymatic degradation of ADP aggravates the activation and aggregation of platelets.

Figure 1
Diagrammatic representation of procoagulant change of porcine endothelial cells and activation of platelets in pig-to-primate organ xenotransplantation

Administration of CD39 substitutes inhibits platelet activation and aggregation, thereby significantly prolonging graft survival [34, 35]. The clotting time of human blood when pre-incubated with islets from CD39-transgenic mice is significantly prolonged, when compared to pre-incubation with wild-type pig islets [36]. Hearts from CD39-transgenic mice are resistant to thrombosis in a mouse-to-rat xenotransplantation model [37].

However, immune-independent factors, such as molecular incompatibilities, also contribute to the activation of platelets directly. The effect of porcine vWF has been mentioned already (see above). This effect probably has in vivo significance, particularly after lung xenotransplantation. For instance, in an ex vivo pig-to-human pulmonary xenotransplantation model [38], pre-treatment of porcine lungs with desmopressin, which can reduce the content of vWF, attenuated platelet activation and systemic intravascular coagulation. Furthermore, if pulmonary intravascular macrophages were depleted in the recipients, baboons survived longer after receiving a lung transplant from a vWF-deficient pig than from a CD46-transgenic pig [39].

Our recent data indicate that, when incubated with porcine ECs, primate platelets are activated to express TF without the involvement of antibodies and complement; the molecular mechanisms remain under investigation, but it is contact-dependent, suggesting that it is distinct from the described effects of porcine vWF (Lin et al. Transplantation, 2008, in press).

Once activated, platelets contain many pro-inflammatory mediators and surface ligands that are expressed and/or released [40]. For example, activated platelets express glycoprotein IIbIIIa (GPIIbIIIa) that increase platelet aggregation in response to certain stimuli. The secretion of ADP from dense granules recruits other platelets to the site of injury and enhances platelet aggregation in response to agonists through the receptor P2Y12[41]. Additionally, activated platelets bind avidly to leukocytes, forming platelet-leukocyte complexes through P-selectin and its ligand on the leukocyte[42]. Reciprocially, activated platelets also exert a direct procoagulant effect on porcine ECs, thus contributing to an auto-amplified self-perpetuating vicious cycle. As well as potentiating the damage inside the graft, activated platelets are seen circulating peripherally, and these may be a significant component driving the CC.

3.4 Apoptosis

AHXR is mainly associated with ECs activation and fibrin deposition on the wall of blood vessels, rather than apoptosis in the endothelium [43]. In recent studies using kidney and heart xenografts, however, numerous TUNEL-positive ECs were detected and concomitant with the development of TM [19, 44]. By detection of annexin V expression, our own in vitro studies demonstrated that both human platelets and monocytes can induce apoptosis of porcine ECs. The disruption of integrity of the ECs and exposure of phosphatidylserine lead to the ECs becoming prothrombotic [45]; any degree of apoptosis of luminal ECs in vivo might contribute to the develpment of thrombosis

4. FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Based on recent progress, the resolution of coagulation dysregulation is critical to allow xenotransplantation to advance sufficiently for clinical trials. Thrombosis manifests in the graft, but there is also a systemic CC, which may have more than one cause. We therefore propose that, in addtion to genetic modification of the organ-source pig, systemic medication may be necessary (Table 1). Hopefully, this combined approach will enable the adverse effects of coagulation disorders to be overcome.

TABLE 1
Potential strategies to inhibit the coagulation dysregulation that occurs following pig-to-primate organ xenotransplantation

4.1 Mutiple-gene transgenic pigs

Although the introduction of GT-KO pigs as a source of organs has provided a significant advance, many unresolved problems have stimulated the drive for additional genetic modifications of the organ-source pig. GT-KO pigs that express a hCRP and one or more ‘anticogulant’ or ‘anti-thrombotic’ genes are anticipated to inhibit the generation of thrombosis and subsequent platelet activation. With new cloning techniques (F2A system), mice transgenic for CD55/hTFPI/hTM/CTLA4-Ig/hCD39 have been generated [46]. The same technology is expected to be successfully applied to generate pigs with multiple gene modifications and will enable these pigs to become available in a shorter period of time than through conventional breeding.

4.2 Systemic medication

Statins

The statins, inhibitors of HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA) reductase, significantly reduce systhesis of cholesterol [47, 48]. Statins have other independent effects, such as immuno-regulatory , anti-inflammatory, and anticoagulant actions [49, 50]. Of relevance to xenotransplantation, atorvastatin reduces porcine EC activation induced by interferon- y [51]. In mixed lymphocyte reaction, atorvastatin inhibits the proliferative response of primate PBMC and CD4+T cells when stimulated with porcine ECs (Ezzelarab et al. Transplantation, 2008, in press). By preventing TF expression and activity, statins have anticoagulant effects, an effect first observed in monocytes and macrophages [52, 53]. Subsequently, simvastatin was shown to prevent the induction of TF on human aortic ECs by thrombin, at least in part through inhibition of rho-kinase-dependent Akt dephosphorylation [54].

Furthermore, lovastatin enhanced ecto-5’-nucleotidase activity and membrane expression in ECs, consequently inhibiting platelet aggregation through the action of adenosine [55]. As mentioned above, the activity of ecto-5’-nucleotidase plays an important role in platelet aggregation during AHXR. These promising in vitro results encourage investigation of the effects of statins in pig-to-primate transplantation models.

Anti-platelet agents

Anti-platelet agents have been extensively used clinically to prevent or reduce the development of cardiovascular dieases [56, 57]. Anti-platelet agents, such as antagonists of P2Y12 or GPIIbIIIa receptors, would be expected to prevent aggregation when platelets are activated during AHXR. Anticoagulant and anti-platelet agents have been tested with the aim of attenuating coagulation disorders. In a hCD46-transgenic pig-to-baboon cardiac transplantation model, warfarin and low-molecular weight heparin had no impact on graft survival, with no reduction in fibrin deposition and platelet thrombi. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel neither prolonged graft survival nor inhibited thombosis in cardiac xenografts [58]. However, clopidogrel exerted some systemic inhibition of platelet aggregation. A high dosage of a GPIIbIIIa antagonist prolonged graft survival and decreased platelet aggregations in a rodent model [59]. Eptifibatide also effectively prevented platelet aggregation in a primate study [60]. Although the impact on graft survival has hitherto been disppointing, these observations suggest that anti-platelet agents are sufficient to prevent platelet aggregation in the circulation. If thrombosis in the graft is prevented by anti-thrombotic gene modification, this systemic approach may offer survival benefits by the prevention of systemic CC.

5. CONCLUSIONS

Coagulation dysregulation has increasingly been recognized as a critical barrier to successful xenotransplantation. Current studies have revealed that coagulation dysregulation involves not only activation in the graft, which may be related to AHXR, but also systemic changes that take place in the circulation; these may be initiated by factors unrelated to the immune response such as activation of platelets by porcine endothelium. A clearer understanding of the molecular interactions between porcine EC and primate platelets may provide new targets for intervention. Ideally, genetic modification of the organ-source pig offers the optimal approach to avoid adverse systemic effects. The generation of GT-KO pigs transgenic for one or more ‘anticoagulant’ or ‘anti-thrombotic’ genes is likely to confer additional benefit. However, the documented systemic coagulation disorders suggest the necessity of an additional pharmacological approach. Multiple genetic modifications of the organ-donor pig combined with medication to inhibit systemic procoagulant changes in the primate recipient are therefore expected to be necessary to overcome this barrier.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Work in our laboratories is supported in part by NIH grant A1068642 (AD, DKCC)

ABBREVIATIONS

AHXR
acute humoral xenograft rejection
CC
consumptive coagulopathy
Ecs
ndothelial cells
fgl-2
fibrinogen-like protein 2
Gal
Gal a 1,3 Gal
GT-KO
α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene knocked out
HAR
hyperacute rejection
hCRP
human complement regulatory protein
TF
tissue factor 2
TFPI
tissue factor pathway inhibitor
vWF
von Willebrand Factor

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

1. Cooper DK, Gollackner B, Sachs DH. Will the pig solve the transplantation backlog? Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:133–147. [PubMed]
2. Cooper DK, Dorling A, Pierson RN, 3rd, Rees M, Seebach J, Yazer M, Ohdan H, Awwad M, Ayares D. Alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout pigs for xenotransplantation: where do we go from here? Transplantation. 2007;84:1–7. [PubMed]
3. Mackman N. Tissue-specific hemostasis: role of tissue factor. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:303–305. [PubMed]
4. Schulte Am Esch J, 2nd, Robson SC, Knoefel WT, Hosch SB, Rogiers X. O-linked glycosylation and functional incompatibility of porcine von Willebrand factor for human platelet GPIb receptors. Xenotransplantation. 2005;12:30–37. [PubMed]
5. Kopp CW, Grey ST, Siegel JB, McShea A, Vetr H, Wrighton CJ, Schulte am Esch J, 2nd, Bach FH, Robson SC. Expression of human thrombomodulin cofactor activity in porcine endothelial cells. Transplantation. 1998;66:244–251. [PubMed]
6. Siegel JB, Grey ST, Lesnikoski BA, Kopp CW, Soares M, Schulte am Esch J, 2nd, Bach FH, Robson SC. Xenogeneic endothelial cells activate human prothrombin. Transplantation. 1997;64:888–896. [PubMed]
7. Roussel JC, Moran CJ, Salvaris EJ, Nandurkar HH, d'Apice AJ, Cowan PJ. Pig thrombomodulin binds human thrombin but is a poor cofactor for activation of human protein C and TAFI. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1101–1112. [PubMed]
8. Kopp CW, Siegel JB, Hancock WW, Anrather J, Winkler H, Geczy CL, Kaczmarek E, Bach FH, Robson SC. Effect of porcine endothelial tissue factor pathway inhibitor on human coagulation factors. Transplantation. 1997;63:749–758. [PubMed]
9. Lee KF, Salvaris EJ, Roussel JC, Robson SC, d'Apice AJ, Cowan PJ. Recombinant pig TFPI efficiently regulates human tissue factor pathways. Xenotransplantation. 2008;15:191–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Chen D, Weber M, McVey JH, Kemball-Cook G, Tuddenham EG, Lechler RI, Dorling A. Complete inhibition of acute humoral rejection using regulated expression of membrane-tethered anticoagulants on xenograft endothelium. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:1958–1963. [PubMed]
11. Mendicino M, Liu M, Ghanekar A, He W, Koscik C, Shalev I, Javadi M, Turnbull J, Chen W, Fung L, Sakamoto S, Marsden P, Waddell TK, Phillips MJ, Gorczynski R, Levy GA, Grant D. Targeted deletion of Fgl-2/fibroleukin in the donor modulates immunologic response and acute vascular rejection in cardiac xenografts. Circulation. 2005;112:248–256. [PubMed]
12. Chen D, Carpenter A, Abrahams J, Chambers RC, Lechler RI, McVey JH, Dorling A. Protease-activated receptor 1 activation is necessary for monocyte chemoattractant protein 1-dependent leukocyte recruitment in vivo. J Exp Med. 2008 (in press) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Crikis S, Cowan PJ, d'Apice AJ. Intravascular thrombosis in discordant xenotransplantation. Transplantation. 2006;82:1119–1123. [PubMed]
14. Cowan PJ. Coagulation and the xenograft endothelium. Xenotransplantation. 2007;14:7–12. [PubMed]
15. Cowan PJ, d'Apice AJ. The coagulation barrier in xenotransplantation: incompatibilities and strategies to overcome them Current Opinion in Organ. Transplantation. 2008;13:178–183. [PubMed]
16. van der Windt DJ, Bottino R, Casu A, Campanile N, Cooper DK. Rapid loss of intraportally transplanted islets: an overview of pathophysiology and preventive strategies. Xenotransplantation. 2007;14:288–297. [PubMed]
17. Cowan PJ, Aminian A, Barlow H, Brown AA, Chen CG, Fisicaro N, Francis DM, Goodman DJ, Han W, Kurek M, Nottle MB, Pearse MJ, Salvaris E, Shinkel TA, Stainsby GV, Stewart AB, d'Apice AJ. Renal xenografts from triple-transgenic pigs are not hyperacutely rejected but cause coagulopathy in non-immunosuppressed baboons. Transplantation. 2000;69:2504–2515. [PubMed]
18. Menoret S, Plat M, Blancho G, Martinat-Botte F, Bernard P, Karam G, Tesson L, Renaudin K, Guillouet P, Weill B, Chereau C, Houdebine LM, Soulillou JP, Terqui M, Anegon I. Characterization of human CD55 and CD59 transgenic pigs and kidney xenotransplantation in the pig-to-baboon combination. Transplantation. 2004;77:1468–1471. [PubMed]
19. Shimizu A, Yamada K, Yamamoto S, Lavelle JM, Barth RN, Robson SC, Sachs DH, Colvin RB. Thrombotic microangiopathic glomerulopathy in human decay accelerating factor-transgenic swine-to-baboon kidney xenografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:2732–2745. [PubMed]
20. Chen G, Qian H, Starzl T, Sun H, Garcia B, Wang X, Wise Y, Liu Y, Xiang Y, Copeman L, Liu W, Jevnikar A, Wall W, Cooper DK, Murase N, Dai Y, Wang W, Xiong Y, White DJ, Zhong R. Acute rejection is associated with antibodies to non-Gal antigens in baboons using Gal-knockout pig kidneys. Nat Med. 2005;11:1295–1298. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Yamada K, Yazawa K, Shimizu A, Iwanaga T, Hisashi Y, Nuhn M, O'Malley P, Nobori S, Vagefi PA, Patience C, Fishman J, Cooper DK, Hawley RJ, Greenstein J, Schuurman HJ, Awwad M, Sykes M, Sachs DH. Marked prolongation of porcine renal xenograft survival in baboons through the use of alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout donors and the cotransplantation of vascularized thymic tissue. Nat Med. 2005;11:32–34. [PubMed]
22. Phelps CJ, Koike C, Vaught TD, Boone J, Wells KD, Chen SH, Ball S, Specht SM, Polejaeva IA, Monahan JA, Jobst PM, Sharma SB, Lamborn AE, Garst AS, Moore M, Demetris AJ, Rudert WA, Bottino R, Bertera S, Trucco M, Starzl TE, Dai Y, Ayares DL. Production of alpha 1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs. Science. 2003;299:411–414. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Tseng YL, Kuwaki K, Dor FJ, Shimizu A, Houser S, Hisashi Y, Yamada K, Robson SC, Awwad M, Schuurman HJ, Sachs DH, Cooper DK. alpha1,3-Galactosyltransferase gene-knockout pig heart transplantation in baboons with survival approaching 6 months. Transplantation. 2005;80:1493–1500. [PubMed]
24. Kuwaki K, Tseng YL, Dor FJ, Shimizu A, Houser SL, Sanderson TM, Lancos CJ, Prabharasuth DD, Cheng J, Moran K, Hisashi Y, Mueller N, Yamada K, Greenstein JL, Hawley RJ, Patience C, Awwad M, Fishman JA, Robson SC, Schuurman HJ, Sachs DH, Cooper DK. Heart transplantation in baboons using alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout pigs as donors: initial experience. Nat Med. 2005;11:29–31. [PubMed]
25. Shimizu I, Smith NR, Zhao G, Medof E, Sykes M. Decayaccelerating factor prevents acute humoral rejection induced by low levels of anti-alphaGal natural antibodies. Transplantation. 2006;81:95–100. [PubMed]
26. Kelishadi SS, Zhang T, Stoddard T, Azimzadeh AM, Welty E, Avon CJ, Larris A, Cheng XF, Barth R, Pierson RN., 3rd Addition of HDAF to the Gal -KO background improved survival and function of pig kidneys in baboons. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:205.
27. Gollackner B, Goh SK, Qawi I, Buhler L, Knosalla C, Daniel S, Kaczmarek E, Awwad M, Cooper DK, Robson SC. Acute vascular rejection of xenografts: roles of natural and elicited xenoreactive antibodies in activation of vascular endothelial cells and induction of procoagulant activity. Transplantation. 2004;77:1735–1741. [PubMed]
28. Saethre M, Baumann BC, Fung M, Seebach JD, Mollnes TE. Characterization of natural human anti-non-gal antibodies and their effect on activation of porcine gal-deficient endothelial cells. Transplantation. 2007;84:244–250. [PubMed]
29. Pearson JD. Endothelial cell function and thrombosis. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 1999;12:329–341. [PubMed]
30. Bach FH, Robson SC, Ferran C, Winkler H, Millan MT, Stuhlmeier KM, Vanhove B, Blakely ML, van der Werf WJ, Hofer E, et al. Endothelial cell activation and thromboregulation during xenograft rejection. Immunol Rev. 1994;141:5–30. [PubMed]
31. Ghanekar A, Mendicino M, Liu H, He W, Liu M, Zhong R, Phillips MJ, Levy GA, Grant DR. Endothelial induction of fgl2 contributes to thrombosis during acute vascular xenograft rejection. J Immunol. 2004;172:5693–5701. [PubMed]
32. Robson SC, Kaczmarek E, Siegel JB, Candinas D, Koziak K, Millan M, Hancock WW, Bach FH. Loss of ATP diphosphohydrolase activity with endothelial cell activation. J Exp Med. 1997;185:153–163. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Khalpey Z, Yuen AH, Kalsi KK, Kochan Z, Karbowska J, Slominska EM, Forni M, Macherini M, Bacci ML, Batten P, Lavitrano M, Yacoub MH, Smolenski RT. Loss of ecto-5'nucleotidase from porcine endothelial cells after exposure to human blood: Implications for xenotransplantation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1741:191–198. [PubMed]
34. Imai M, Takigami K, Guckelberger O, Enjyoji K, Smith RN, Lin Y, Csizmadia E, Sevigny J, Rosenberg RD, Bach FH, Robson SC. Modulation of nucleoside [correction of nucleotide] triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1 (NTPDase-1)cd39 in xenograft rejection. Mol Med. 1999;5:743–752. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Koyamada N, Miyatake T, Candinas D, Hechenleitner P, Siegel J, Hancock WW, Bach FH, Robson SC. Apyrase administration prolongs discordant xenograft survival. Transplantation. 1996;62:1739–1743. [PubMed]
36. Dwyer KM, Mysore TB, Crikis S, Robson SC, Nandurkar H, Cowan PJ, D'Apice AJ. The transgenic expression of human CD39 on murine islets inhibits clotting of human blood. Transplantation. 2006;82:428–432. [PubMed]
37. Dwyer KM, Robson SC, Nandurkar HH, Campbell DJ, Gock H, Murray-Segal LJ, Fisicaro N, Mysore TB, Kaczmarek E, Cowan PJ, d'Apice AJ. Thromboregulatory manifestations in human CD39 transgenic mice and the implications for thrombotic disease and transplantation. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1440–1446. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Kim YT, Lee HJ, Lee SW, Kim JY, Wi HC, Park SJ, Bae SJ, Kang HJ. Pre-treatment of porcine pulmonary xenograft with desmopressin: a novel strategy to attenuate platelet activation and systemic intravascular coagulation in an ex-vivo model of swine-to-human pulmonary xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2008;15:27–35. [PubMed]
39. Cantu E, Balsara KR, Li B, Lau C, Gibson S, Wyse A, Baig K, Gaca J, Gonzalez-Stawinski GV, Nichols T, Parker W, Davis RD. Prolonged function of macrophage, von Willebrand factor-deficient porcine pulmonary xenografts. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:66–75. [PubMed]
40. Morrell CN, Sun H, Swaim AM, Baldwin WM., 3rd Platelets an inflammatory force in transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:2447–2454. [PubMed]
41. Dorsam RT, Kunapuli SP. Central role of the P2Y12 receptor in platelet activation. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:340–345. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Wagner DD, Frenette PS. The vessel wall and its interactions. Blood. 2008;111:5271–5281. [PubMed]
43. Holzknecht ZE, Kuypers KL, Plummer TB, Williams J, Bustos M, Gores GJ, Brunn GJ, Platt JL. Apoptosis and cellular activation in the pathogenesis of acute vascular rejection. Circ Res. 2002;91:1135–1141. [PubMed]
44. Shimizu A, Hisashi Y, Kuwaki K, Tseng YL, Dor FJ, Houser SL, Robson SC, Schuurman HJ, Cooper DK, Sachs DH, Yamada K, Colvin RB. Thrombotic microangiopathy associated with humoral rejection of cardiac xenografts from alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout pigs in baboons. The American journal of pathology. 2008;172:1471–1481. [PubMed]
45. Bombeli T, Karsan A, Tait JF, Harlan JM. Apoptotic vascular endothelial cells become procoagulant. Blood. 1997;89:2429–2442. [PubMed]
46. Fisicaro N, d'Apice AJ, Cowan PJ. Efficient co-expression of multiple graft-protective transgenes using the 2A. Xenotransplantation. 2007;14(4):383.
47. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, Cole TG, Brown L, Warnica JW, Arnold JM, Wun CC, Davis BR, Braunwald E. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001–1009. [PubMed]
48. Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, Whitney E, Shapiro DR, Beere PA, Langendorfer A, Stein EA, Kruyer W, Gotto AM., Jr Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. Jama. 1998;279:1615–1622. [PubMed]
49. LaRosa JC. Pleiotropic effects of statins and their clinical significance. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:291–293. [PubMed]
50. Palinski W. New evidence for beneficial effects of statins unrelated to lipid lowering. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:3–5. [PubMed]
51. Ezzelarab M, Cooper DK. The potential of statins in xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2007;14:100–103. [PubMed]
52. Colli S, Eligini S, Lalli M, Camera M, Paoletti R, Tremoli E. Vastatins inhibit tissue factor in cultured human macrophages. A novel mechanism of protection against atherothrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:265–272. [PubMed]
53. Aikawa M, Rabkin E, Sugiyama S, Voglic SJ, Fukumoto Y, Furukawa Y, Shiomi M, Schoen FJ, Libby P. An HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, cerivastatin, suppresses growth of macrophages expressing matrix metalloproteinases and tissue factor in vivo and in vitro. Circulation. 2001;103:276–283. [PubMed]
54. Eto M, Kozai T, Cosentino F, Joch H, Luscher TF. Statin prevents tissue factor expression in human endothelial cells: role of Rho/Rhokinase and Akt pathways. Circulation. 2002;105:1756–1759. [PubMed]
55. Ledoux S, Laouari D, Essig M, Runembert I, Trugnan G, Michel JB, Friedlander G. Lovastatin enhances ecto-5'-nucleotidase activity and cell surface expression in endothelial cells: implication of rho-family GTPases. Circ Res. 2002;90:420–427. [PubMed]
56. Chan AW, Moliterno DJ, Berger PB, Stone GW, DiBattiste PM, Yakubov SL, Sapp SK, Wolski K, Bhatt DL, Topol EJ. Triple antiplatelet therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved outcomes including one-year survival: results from the Do Tirofiban and ReoProGive Similar Efficacy Outcome Trial (TARGET) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1188–1195. [PubMed]
57. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Zaman KA, Yoho JA, Hayes KM, Tantry US. Clopidogrel loading with eptifibatide to arrest the reactivity of platelets: results of the Clopidogrel Loading With Eptifibatide to Arrest the Reactivity of Platelets (CLEAR PLATELETS) study. Circulation. 2005;111:1153–1159. [PubMed]
58. Schirmer JM, Fass DN, Byrne GW, Tazelaar HD, Logan JS, McGregor CG. Effective antiplatelet therapy does not prolong transgenic pig to baboon cardiac xenograft survival. Xenotransplantation. 2004;11:436–443. [PubMed]
59. Candinas D, Lesnikoski BA, Robson SC, Miyatake T, Scesney SM, Marsh HC, Jr, Ryan US, Dalmasso AP, Hancock WW, Bach FH. Effect of repetitive high-dose treatment with soluble complement receptor type 1 and cobra venom factor on discordant xenograft survival. Transplantation. 1996;62:336–342. [PubMed]
60. Alwayn IP, Appel JZ, Goepfert C, Buhler L, Cooper DK, Robson SC. Inhibition of platelet aggregation in baboons: therapeutic implications for xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2000;7:247–257. [PubMed]