PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Atherosclerosis. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2757486
NIHMSID: NIHMS119455

Expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase splice variants in atherosclerotic plaques of apoE knockout mice

Abstract

Objective

We previously reported that deletion of brain type neuronal nitric oxide synthase-α (nNOS-α) accelerates atherosclerosis in apolipoproteinE (apoE) knockout (ko) mice. The regulation of nNOS expression is complex, involving the generation of mRNA splice variants. The current study investigates occurrence and distribution of nNOS variants in atherosclerotic lesions of apoE ko and apoE/nNOS-α double ko (dko) animals.

Methods

Mice were fed a high fat diet for 20 weeks. Immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis were performed using antibodies detecting the carboxy terminal-, or amino terminal-residue of the nNOS protein. Confocal microscopy and in situ hybridization were used to identify the compartment of cellular expression.

Results

In situ hybridization revealed the presence of nNOS-α and -γ mRNA variants in apoE ko plaques, while only nNOS-γ was detectable in apoE/nNOS dko plaques. Consistent with mRNA expression nNOS-α protein can be detected in the neointima of apoE ko, but not apoE/nNOS dko animals. In contrast, the carboxy terminal antibody stained the neointima and media in apoE ko vessels and showed residual nNOS immunoreactivity in apoE/nNOS dko lesions. Confocal microscopy showed predominant nNOS expression in vascular smooth muscle cells, while colocalization with macrophages was less pronounced.

Conclusions

Our study shows that nNOS-α and -γ splice variants are expressed in atherosclerotic plaques of apoE ko mice. nNOS variants colocalized with markers for vascular smooth muscle cells and macrophages but not for endothelial cells. Since nNOS-α is atheroprotective, other nNOS splice variants which differ in enzyme kinetic and subcellular localization may also influence plaque formation.

Keywords: Atherosclerosis, Neuronal nitric oxide synthase, Splice variants, Nitric oxide, nNOS variants

1. Introduction

Nitric oxide is an autocrine and paracrine signalling molecule which is generated by three different nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms [1]. While only endothelial NOS (eNOS) is detectable in healthy human vessels with standard techniques, all three isoforms are present in atherosclerotic lesions [2]. The importance of eNOS for vascular function is well documented and eNOS deletion in apoE ko mice leads to increased atherosclerosis [3]. The inducible isoform (iNOS) is expressed in inflammatory cells and vascular smooth muscle cells and has proatherogenic effects, since deletion of iNOS decreases plaque development in apoE ko mice [4]. eNOS and nNOS activity depends on the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, whereas iNOS is regulated by modulation of enzyme expression. In the human atherosclerotic plaque nNOS is expressed in smooth muscle cells, macrophages and endothelial cells [2]. Recently, we have addressed the role of nNOS in atherogenesis and showed that the deletion of nNOS-α leads to an increase in atherosclerosis in apoE ko mice [5]. In the latter study we detected nNOS-α and nNOS-γ mRNA variants in total RNA from vessels of C57/Bl6 and apoE ko animals by RT-PCR but did not investigate the compartment of splice variant expression.

The neuronal NOS was first detected in nitrinergic nerves and brain tissue [68]. Regulation of nNOS expression is complex through alternative splicing, deletion and insertion of exons and multiple promoter usage [911]. In mice, four different nNOS protein variants have been detected in non-vascular tissue (Fig. 1). The nNOS-α- and nNOS-µ-variants contain the PDZ (postsynaptic density-95/discs large/zona occludens-1 homology) domain which allows binding of the enzyme to the cell membrane and fast activation through calcium influx [12]. Multiple transcripts encode for nNOS-α, which has high catalytic activity [13]. nNOS-µ which has an identical kinetic constant compared to nNOS-α is predominantly expressed in differentiated skeletal muscle and differs from other nNOS variants by a 102 bp insertion between exon 16 and 17 [14]. nNOS-β and nNOS-γ, which lack the membrane PDZ-binding-domain, are cytoplasmic enzymes. The latter isoforms are expressed at low levels in brain tissue of nNOS ko mice and contribute to residual nNOS catalytic activity [15]. In vitro studies revealed that enzyme activity for nNOS-β is approximately 80% of nNOS-α, while the activity for nNOS-γ is low (3%) [12]. While the differences in catalytic activity between the variants is one aspect, the presence of the PDZ domain in the enzymes determines specific binding sites for PIN (protein inhibitor of NOS) [16], the NMDA receptor [17], syntropin [12] or CAPON (carboxyl terminal PDZ lig-and of NOS) [18]. These protein-protein interactions may regulate NO production and signal transduction. So far, nNOS splice variants have been detected in the human and rat gastrointestinal tract and nNOS-β was shown to mediate penile erection [1921]. Furthermore, nNOS-γ and nNOS-β are upregulated in amyotropic lateral sclerosis and may mediate oxidative damage [22].

Fig. 1
Map of nNOS splice variant exon structures (gray boxes, E1a-E29) and protein regions targeted by the antibodies used. nNOS-α and nNOS-µ contain a PDZ domain (PDZ) encoded in exon 2. nNOS-β and nNOS-γ lack the PDZ-domain ...

In the present study we used apoE ko and apoE/nNOS (Exon 2 deletion) dko mice to investigate the distribution of nNOS mRNA and protein variants in the atherosclerotic plaques.

2. Methods

All procedures performed conformed with the policies of the University of Würzburg, the NIH guidelines and an independent governmental committee for care and use of laboratory animals.

2.1. Animals

apoE ko mice came from The Jackson Laboratory. nNOS ko animals (Exon 2 deletion) came from Paul Huang’s laboratory [23]. ApoE/nNOS dko mice were generated as described earlier [5], weaned at 3 weeks and fed a standard western type diet (42% of total calories from fat; 0.15% cholesterol; Harlan Teklad) for 20 weeks. In general, animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital (80 µg/kg i.p.). The aorta was rinsed with ice-cold PBS buffer through the left ventricle and the aorta was removed quickly and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. For immunohistochemistry tissues were fixed in 10% phosphate buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin or directly frozen in Tissue-Tek™ (Sakura Finetek).

2.2. In situ hybridization

In situ hybridization using 33P-end-labelled oligonucleotides was performed as described [15]. Following oligonucleotide sequences, specifically targeting nNOS splice variants were used: 5′-CAG CCA TCA GCC AGC AAA GAC CAG CCA TTA GCA GTA GAC AGG GTC-3′ for nNOS-α and 5′-GCC CCA GCC ACC TTG CCT TCC AGA GAC CTC GAC GGC AAA CTG CAC A-3′ for nNOS-γ. The probe for nNOS-γ recognizes the junction of exon 1b and exon 3 of nNOS [15]. The probe for nNOS-α targets exon 2. Probes were 33P-labelled using terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase and 2.5 µCi were applied per slide. Cryosections of the aortic root (n = 4 per genotype, duplicate slides per animal) were hybridized overnight at 45 °C, washed in SSC and dipped in NTB-2 emulsion (Kodak). Slides were then developed for 14 days, fixed and counterstained with hematoxylin/eosin. Probes corresponding to the sense strand of the splice variants were processed according to the standard labelling protocol and used as a negative control.

2.3. Western blot analysis

Aortas were homogenized under liquid nitrogen and total protein was extracted. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Antibodies raised against the amino terminal end of the nNOS protein, specific for nNOS-α and nNOS-µ (1:250, US Biological, for aorta; 1:500, Stress gene, for brain), or its carboxy terminal end, detecting nNOS-α, -β, -γ and -µ variants (1:500, BD Biosciences) were used to probe for nNOS. As secondary antibody rabbit IgG TrueBlot™ (eBioscience) was used and staining was visualized by an ECL-Kit (Amersham). Brain homogenates were used as positive controls.

2.4. Immunohistochemistry

For immunohistochemistry serial sections of paraffin or Tissue-Tek™ embedded aortic roots and aortic arches were used to detect nNOS expression in atherosclerotic lesions of apoE ko and apoE/nNOS dko mice. Briefly, endogenous peroxidase and biotin activity was blocked with 0.03% hydrogen peroxide. Then, sections were incubated with the primary antibodies raised against the carboxy- or amino terminus of the nNOS protein. Sections were subsequently incubated with abiotinylated secondary antibody (BD Biosciences) and freshly prepared ABC-reagent (Vectastain; Vector) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The secondary antibody was detected using glucose oxidase-3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Hematoxylin was used for counterstaining. Secondary antibody alone served as a negative control.

2.5. Confocal microscopy

To investigate the cellular compartment of nNOS splice variant expression the amino- and carboxy terminal anti-nNOS antibodies (US Biological 1:50, BD Bioscience 1:20) were incubated on acetone fixed cryosections of the aortic arch of apoE ko mice. Following appropriate blocking procedures, cross reactivity of secondary antibodies with the alternating primary antibodies was ruled out.

Colocalization of nNOS protein with cell markers of macrophages, endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells was examined by double immunofluorescence. Slides were incubated with rat anti-nNOS primary (BD Bioscience 1:20) followed by the biotinylated rabbit anti-rat secondary antibody (Vector 1:200) and subsequently stained with streptavidin–texas red complex. After washing, slides were incubated with the antibodies directed against macrophages (MOMA-2, Chemicon 1:25), endothelial cells (CD 31, BD Bioscience 1:100) or vascular smooth muscle cells (α-smooth-muscle actin, Sigma 1:60). The latter antibodies were either directly labelled with fluoresceinisothiocyanate (FITC) or a secondary FITC-labelled antibody was used. Finally, all sections were mounted with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) mounting media and examined with a confocal microscope (Zeiss).

3. Results

3.1. Detection of nNOS-α and nNOS-γ mRNA by in situ hybridization

In order to localize nNOS mRNA splice variants in atherosclerotic lesions we performed in situ hybridization with splice variant specific probes. Using this technique nNOS-α mRNA is localized in the media and the neointima of lesions in aortic roots of apoE ko mice (Fig. 2a). In contrast, NOS-α mRNA was not detectable in plaques of apoE/nNOS dko animals (Fig. 2b). The nNOS-γ hybridization probe revealed staining in the media and the neointima of apoE ko and apoE/nNOS dko mice (Fig. 2d, e). No staining was observed with all negative control sense probes as shown for nNOS-α and nNOS-γ on sections of an apoE ko aorta (Fig. 2c, f, sense ko).

Fig. 2
In situ hybridization using splice variant specific radio labelled probes for nNOS-α (a, b) and nNOS-γ (d, e). Cryosections of aortic roots of apoE ko (ko) (a, c, d, f) and apoE/nNOS dko (dko) (b, e) animals were incubated with antisense ...

3.2. Residual nNOS protein in apoE/nNOS dko mice

Immunostaining with the carboxy terminal antibody revealed strong nNOS expression in the media and neointima of apoE ko plaques (Fig. 3a). In apoE/nNOS dko animals nNOS protein expression appeared less robust (Fig. 3b). Employing the amino terminal antibody which recognizes the first 139 amino acids of nNOS-α, no staining was observed in apoE/nNOS dko animals (Fig. 3d), whereas specific expression of nNOS-α is shown in the intima and media of apoE ko animals (Fig. 3c). Western blot analysis of nNOS protein isolated from the total aorta revealed the presence of protein bands consistent with nNOS-α (155 kDa) and nNOS-γ (125 kDa) (Fig. 4a). In agreement with the results from the immunohistochemistry, no nNOS-α protein (155 kDa) was detected in aortas from apoE/nNOS dko animals. The absence of a protein band of higher molecular weight suggests that nNOS-µ (164 kDa) expression is not relevant in apoE ko aortas. Similar results were obtained using brain lysates from both genotypes (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 3
Immunostaining for nNOS in atherosclerotic lesions of apoE ko (ko) and apoE/nNOS dko (dko) mice. Robust nNOS staining is detectable with the carboxy terminal (c-term) antibody (a) and the amino terminal (n-term) antibody (c) in the neointima and media ...
Fig. 4
(a) Western blot analysis of total aortic lysates from apoE ko (ko) and apoE/nNOS dko (dko) animals using an amino terminal (n-term) and a carboxy terminal (c-term) antibody. nNOS-α protein (155 kDa) is present in apoE ko aortas and absent in ...

3.3. Colocalization of nNOS protein with macrophages, endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells

Immunofluorescence studies show colocalization of the staining with the amino terminal and the carboxy terminal antibodies, suggesting that nNOS splice variants are co-expressed in the same cellular compartment in the plaque (Fig. 5a). In control experiments cross reactivity of secondary reagents to the two primary anti-nNOS antibodies was ruled out (data not shown).

Fig. 5
Fluorescence microscopy of nNOS protein in atherosclerotic lesions. (a) Sections of the aortic arch of apoE ko animals were incubated successively with the carboxy terminal (C-term, green) and the amino terminal (N-term, red) anti-nNOS antibody. Both ...

Additionally, confocal microscopy was used to identify the cell types expressing nNOS proteins in atherosclerotic lesions of apoE ko mice (Fig. 5b). α-Smooth-muscle actin-positive vascular smooth muscle cells, primarily detected in the media and to a lesser extent in the neointima showed robust nNOS expression (Fig. 5b). Several, but not all MOMA-2-positive macrophages showed nNOS immunoreactivity, while CD31-positive endothelial cells did not reveal nNOS staining (Fig. 5b).

4. Discussion

The present study revealed three major findings. First, nNOS-α and nNOS-γ splice variants are expressed in the atherosclerotic plaque. Second, nNOS-α and nNOS-γ splice variants colocalize in the same cellular compartment. Third, in apoE ko vessels nNOS is expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells and macrophages in the neointima and media.

Wilcox et al. previously reported nNOS mRNA and protein expression in early and advanced human atherosclerotic plaques and absence of nNOS in healthy human vessels [2]. More recent studies using high sensitivity immunohistochemistry document the existence of nNOS in vascular smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells and perivascular nerve fibres in healthy vascular tissue of rats, pigs and humans [2426]. Furthermore, nNOS expression is increased in rat vascular smooth muscle cells under conditions of high intraluminal pressure, following hypoxia and stimulation with platelet derived growth factor [2731]. In a carotid artery ligation model, Morishita et al. found accelerated neointima formation and constrictive vascular remodelling in nNOS ko mice, suggesting that nNOS expression protects from vascular injury. In addition, these authors report absence of nNOS in carotid arteries of wild type mice [32].

Previous work from our laboratory suggests that nNOS-α protects apoE ko mice from spontaneous development of atherosclerosis [5]. In the latter study, deletion of nNOS (Exon 2) in apoE ko animals led to an increase in atherosclerotic plaque area compared to apoE ko control mice. Since we observed residual nNOS expression in aortas of apoE/nNOS dko animals, we here investigated the presence and localization of nNOS splice variants in the atherosclerotic plaque. We document expression of nNOS protein in the neointima and the plaque bordering media of atherosclerotic lesions from apoE ko and apoE/nNOS dko animals using a carboxy terminal antibody (Fig. 3a, b). In order to localize nNOS-α protein we used the antibody directed against the amino terminal end of nNOS. And indeed, we obtained a robust staining of apoE ko plaques, while apoE/nNOS dko plaques show no residual staining (Fig. 3c, d), suggesting the existence of nNOS splice variants in atherosclerotic lesions.

In brain tissues three differently spliced nNOS proteins have been described [12]. In the latter study residual catalytic nNOS activity (5% of wildtype) in brain tissue of nNOS (exon 2) ko mice was due to the presence of nNOS-β and -γ variants. In vitro catalytic activity of the nNOS-γ variant is low, reaching approximately 3% of nNOS-α, while the activity of the nNOS-β variant is about 80% of nNOS-α [12]. The nNOS-µ, variant has similar catalytic activity compared to nNOS-α. While nNOS-µ, is predominantly expressed in skeletal muscle, recent reports localized low amounts of nNOS-µ, in the media and adventitia of rat and human vascular tissue [3335]. Schwarz et al. reported that inhibition of nNOS following endothelial denudation enhanced agonist mediated vasoconstriction in rat aortic rings, indicating a role for nNOS in regulation of vascular tone [34].

We confirm the presence of nNOS variants of different molecular weight in the atherosclerotic aorta using immunoblot analysis and demonstrate the presence of an additional nNOS protein band at the predicted molecular weight of nNOS-γ (125 kDa). No larger protein band at the expected molecular weight of nNOS-µ (164 kDa) was detected in aortic tissues by Western blot in both genotypes and nNOS-µ and nNOS-β mRNA was not detectable by RT-PCR in our previous study [5].

Using in situ hybridization we detect mRNA of nNOS-α and nNOS-γ splice variants in atherosclerotic lesions (Fig. 2). In situ hybridization experiments employing appropriate negative control sense oligonucleotides revealed no unspecific staining for the two probes. Since nNOS-µ, and nNOS-β were not detectable by Western blot and RT-PCR we conclude that nNOS-µ and nNOS-β are not expressed in the atherosclerotic plaque and did not perform in situ hybridization for these splice variants.

We see strong signals of nNOS-γ on the mRNA level in apoE ko mice. While nNOS-α is involved in the regulation of receptor and ion channel functions by binding to membrane proteins, the functional role of cytoplasmic nNOS-γ with low in vitro enzyme activity in vascular tissue is presently unclear, but might be independent of the existence and function of nNOS-α. This would be in agreement with the finding that the lack of nNOS-α does not change mRNA expression levels of nNOS-γ in apoE/nNOS dko aortas compared to apoE ko aortas [5]. nNOS activity is regulated by several posttranslational mechanisms including enzyme activation through calcium–calmodulin, phosphorylation and by protein interactions [36]. In this respect, activation through interaction with membrane proteins like PDZ-binding domains or caveolin-3 have been described [3739]. Taking in mind, that nNOS-γ lacks the PDZ domain which is essential for membrane binding, it seems reasonable to speculate that its regulation and function in cell signalling differs from the PDZ containing splice variants. The truncated splice variants may maintain basal nitric oxide production. Moreover, the nature of the N-terminal modifications may change the enzymes ability to produce reactive oxygen [40] species along with NO production in various cellular compartments and influence dimerization, required for catalytic activation. Therefore, the presence of nNOS gamma in the plaque may influence oxidative stress and impact on substrate and cofactor availability required for proper function of the atheroprotective isoform nNOS alpha. Interestingly, primitive NOS protein variants which lack N-terminal elements have been identified [41,42] pointing towards conservation of nNOS splice variant like proteins throughout evolution, underscoring the potential importance of this regulation.

In eNOS ko mice, nNOS was shown to be responsible for flow induced dilatation of coronary arteries [43]. In this study Huang et al. detected nNOS in the endothelial cell layer of coronary arteries of eNOS ko, but not in wild type mice. Our results are consistent with the latter study, since confocal microscopy showed absence of nNOS immunostaining in endothelial cells of apoE ko animals (Fig. 5b) and we previously reported that eNOS expression is comparable in apoE ko and apoE/nNOS dko mice [5]. In contrast, Loesch and Burnstock found nNOS protein in endothelial cells of the rat basilary artery using immuno-gold labelling [24]. This difference might be due to the different assays, or the diverse models used.

As expected, nNOS protein colocalizes to smooth muscle cells in the media and neointima. Here, only a few cells show positive α-smooth muscle actin staining. As proposed by Wilcox et al. smooth muscle cells in the neointima may dedifferentiate to mesenchymal appearing intimal cells, which are not detected by specific markers for macrophages, endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells [2]. These cells express nNOS mRNA and protein and thus are likely to contribute to nNOS activity in atherosclerotic plaques [2]. Consistent with previous studies our data show low nNOS expression levels in lesional macrophages [2].

5. Conclusion

In summary, nNOS-α and nNOS-γ splice variants are expressed in atherosclerotic lesions of apoE ko mice. While nNOS expression was localized in vascular smooth muscle cells and fewer lesional macrophages, it was absent in endothelial cells. Our previous studies show that nNOS-α protects from plaque development. Thus, the presence of nNOS splice variants, their differences in enzyme kinetics and subcellular localization could mediate various functional properties relevant to plaque formation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche-Forschungsgemeinschaft (KU-1206(1) u. 1206(2) to P.K., the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS, NS33335) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI, HL57818) to P.L.H. P.L.H. is an established investigator of the American Heart Association. We thank Mrs. G. Riehl and Mrs. A. Ganscher for excellent technical assistance.

References

1. Mungrue IN, Bredt DS, Stewart DJ, Husain M. From molecules to mammals: what’s NOS got to do with it? Acta Physiol Scand. 2003;179:123–135. [PubMed]
2. Wilcox JN, Subramanian RR, Sundell CL, et al. Expression of multiple isoforms of nitric oxide synthase in normal and atherosclerotic vessels. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:2479–2488. [PubMed]
3. Kuhlencordt PJ, Gyurko R, Han F, et al. Accelerated atherosclerosis, aortic aneurysm formation, and ischemic heart disease in apolipoprotein E/endothelial nitric oxide synthase double-knockout mice. Circulation. 2001;104:448–454. [PubMed]
4. Kuhlencordt PJ, Chen J, Han F, Astern J, Huang PL. Genetic deficiency of inducible nitric oxide synthase reduces atherosclerosis and lowers plasma lipid peroxides in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Circulation. 2001;103:3099–3104. [PubMed]
5. Kuhlencordt PJ, Hotten S, Schodel J, et al. Atheroprotective effects of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in apolipoprotein e knockout mice. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:1539–1544. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Bredt DS, Hwang PM, Snyder SH. Localization of nitric oxide synthase indicating a neural role for nitric oxide. Nature. 1990;347:768–770. [PubMed]
7. Bredt DS, Snyder SH. Isolation of nitric oxide synthetase, a calmodulin-requiring enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:682–685. [PubMed]
8. Mungrue IN, Bredt DS. nNOS at a glance: implications for brain and brawn. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:2627–2629. [PubMed]
9. Brenman JE, Xia H, Chao DS, Black SM, Bredt DS. Regulation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase through alternative transcripts. Dev Neurosci. 1997;19:224–231. [PubMed]
10. Wang Y, Newton DC, Robb GB, et al. RNA diversity has profound effects on the translation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:12150–12155. [PubMed]
11. Boissel JP, Schwarz PM, Forstermann U. Neuronal-type NO synthase: transcript diversity and expressional regulation. Nitric Oxide. 1998;2:337–349. [PubMed]
12. Brenman JE, Chao DS, Gee SH, et al. Interaction of nitric oxide synthase with the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95 and alpha1-syntrophin mediated by PDZ domains. Cell. 1996;84:757–767. [PubMed]
13. Wang Y, Newton DC, Marsden PA. Neuronal NOS: gene structure, mRNA diversity, and functional relevance. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1999;13:21–43. [PubMed]
14. Silvagno F, Xia H, Bredt DS. Neuronal nitric-oxide synthase-mu, an alternatively spliced isoform expressed in differentiated skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:11204–11208. [PubMed]
15. Eliasson MJ, Blackshaw S, Schell MJ, Snyder SH. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase alternatively spliced forms: prominent functional localizations in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:3396–3401. [PubMed]
16. Hemmens B, Woschitz S, Pitters E, et al. The protein inhibitor of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (PIN): characterization of its action on pure nitric oxide synthases. FEBS Lett. 1998;430:397–400. [PubMed]
17. Christopherson KS, Hillier BJ, Lim WA, Bredt DS. PSD-95 assembles a ternary complex with the N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptor and a bivalent neuronal NO synthase PDZ domain. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:27467–27473. [PubMed]
18. Jaffrey SR, Snowman AM, Eliasson MJ, Cohen NA, Snyder SH. CAPON: a protein associated with neuronal nitric oxide synthase that regulates its interactions with PSD95. Neuron. 1998;20:115–124. [PubMed]
19. Hurt KJ, Sezen SF, Champion HC, et al. Alternatively spliced neuronal nitric oxide synthase mediates penile erection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006 [PubMed]
20. Huber A, Saur D, Kurjak M, Schusdziarra V, Allescher HD. Characterization and splice variants of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in rat small intestine. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:G1146–G1156. [PubMed]
21. Saur D, Neuhuber WL, Gengenbach B, Huber A, Schusdziarra V, Allescher HD. Site-specific gene expression of nNOS variants in distinct functional regions of rat gastrointestinal tract. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002;282:G349–G358. [PubMed]
22. Catania MV, Aronica E, Yankaya B, Troost D. Increased expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase spliced variants in reactive astrocytes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis human spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2001;21:RC148. [PubMed]
23. Huang PL, Dawson TM, Bredt DS, Snyder SH, Fishman MC. Targeted disruption of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene. Cell. 1993;75:1273–1286. [PubMed]
24. Loesch A, Burnstock G. Perivascular nerve fibres and endothelial cells of the rat basilar artery: immuno-gold labelling of antigenic sites for type I and type III nitric oxide synthase. J Neurocytol. 1998;27:197–204. [PubMed]
25. Buchwalow IB, Podzuweit T, Bocker W, et al. Vascular smooth muscle and nitric oxide synthase. FASEB J. 2002;16:500–508. [PubMed]
26. Brophy CM, Knoepp L, Xin J, Pollock JS. Functional expression of NOS 1 in vascular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;278:H991–H997. [PubMed]
27. Ebrahimian T, Mathieu E, Silvestre JS, Boulanger CM. Intraluminal pressure increases vascular neuronal nitric oxide synthase expression. J Hypertens. 2003;21:937–942. [PubMed]
28. Boulanger CM, Heymes C, Benessiano J, Geske RS, Levy BI, Vanhoutte PM. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase is expressed in rat vascular smooth muscle cells: activation by angiotensin II in hypertension. Circ Res. 1998;83:1271–1278. [PubMed]
29. Nakata S, Tsutsui M, Shimokawa H, et al. Vascular neuronal no synthase is selectively upregulated by platelet-derived growth factor involvement of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005 [PubMed]
30. Tsutsui M. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase as a novel antiatherogenic factor. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2004;11:41–48. [PubMed]
31. Ward ME, Toporsian M, Scott JA, et al. Hypoxia induces a functionally significant and translationally efficient neuronal NO synthase mRNA variant. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3128–3139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Morishita T, Tsutsui M, Shimokawa H, et al. Vasculoprotective roles of neuronal nitric oxide synthase. FASEB J. 2002;16:1994–1996. [PubMed]
33. Larsson B, Phillips SC. Isolation and characterization of a novel, human neuronal nitric oxide synthase cDNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;251:898–902. [PubMed]
34. Schwarz PM, Kleinert H, Forstermann U. Potential functional significance of brain-type and muscle-type nitric oxide synthase I expressed in adventitia and media of rat aorta. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:2584–2590. [PubMed]
35. Lin CS, Lau A, Bakircioglu E, et al. Analysis of neuronal nitric oxide synthase isoform expression and identification of human nNOS-mu. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;253:388–394. [PubMed]
36. Kone BC, Kuncewicz T, Zhang W, Yu ZY. Protein interactions with nitric oxide synthases: controlling the right time, the right place, and the right amount of nitric oxide. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003;285:F178–F190. [PubMed]
37. Venema VJ, Ju H, Zou R, Venema RC. Interaction of neuronal nitric-oxide synthase with caveolin-3 in skeletal muscle. Identification of a novel caveolin scaffolding/inhibitory domain. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:28187–28190. [PubMed]
38. Perez AS, Bredt DS. The N-terminal PDZ-containing region of postsynaptic density-95 mediates association with caveolar-like lipid domains. Neurosci Lett. 1998;258:121–123. [PubMed]
39. Sato Y, Sagami I, Shimizu T. Identification of caveolin-1-interacting sites in neuronal nitric-oxide synthase. Molecular mechanism for inhibition of NO formation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:8827–8836. [PubMed]
40. Pou S, Keaton L, Surichamorn W, Rosen GM. Mechanism of superoxide generation by neuronal nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:9573–9580. [PubMed]
41. Adak S, Aulak KS, Stuehr DJ. Direct evidence for nitric oxide production by a nitric-oxide synthase-like protein from Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:16167–16171. [PubMed]
42. Adak S, Bilwes AM, Panda K, et al. expression, and characterization of a nitric oxide synthase protein from Deinococcus radiodurans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:107–112. [PubMed]
43. Huang A, Sun D, Shesely EG, Levee EM, Koller A, Kaley G. Neuronal NOS-dependent dilation to flow in coronary arteries of male eNOS-KO mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;282:H429–H436. [PubMed]