Identification of the main cannabinoid receptors (CB
1 and CB
2), their endogenous lipid ligands (endocannabinoids), biosynthetic pathways and metabolizing enzymes (collectively termed the ECS) [
8–
10], coupled with the discovery and/or rational design of numerous exogenous ligands for CB receptors [
11], has triggered an exponential growth in studies exploring the continuously growing regulatory functions of this newly discovered physiological system both in health and disease [
12–
14].
Excitingly, modulating the activity of the ECS has turned out to hold tremendous therapeutic potential for a multitude of diseases and pathological conditions affecting humans [
13,
15,
16], ranging from inflammatory [
17], neurodegenerative [
18–
20], gastrointestinal [
21,
22], liver [
23,
24], cardiovascular disorders [
25,
26] and obesity [
27,
28], to ischemia/reperfusion injury [
29], cancer [
30] and pain [
31].
The most extensively studied endocannabinoids are anandamide (
N-arachidonoylethanolamine,AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) [
8,
32]. Multiple pathways are involved in synthesis and cellular uptake of these lipid mediators; these are described in several excellent recent reviews [
10,
33,
34] and beyond the scope of this article. The most common degradation pathways for AEA and 2-AG are the fatty acid amid hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) enzymes [
10]. Endocannabinoids, similar to Δ
9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; the main active ingredient of the plant
Cannabis sativa), predominantly exert their physiological effects via two main G-protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors; however, numerous additional signaling mechanisms and receptor systems (e.g. transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 1; TRPV1) might also be involved [
35]. Initially, the CB
1-mediated effects were described centrally and CB
1 receptors were thought to be restricted to the central nervous system, whereas CB
2 was first identified at the periphery in immune cells. Excitingly, findings over the past decade have clearly demonstrated that functional ECS is present almost in all peripheral organ systems [
13–
15].
Indeed, components of the ECS have also been discovered in the skin recently (). Both CB
1 and CB
2 immunoreactivities were observed on numerous human and murine skin cell populations
in situ such as on cutaneous nerve fibers, mast cells, epidermal keratinocytes and cells of the adnexal tissues [
36–
42]. Similarly, both CB
1 and CB
2 have been identified (at protein and mRNA levels) on cultured human primary (NHEK) and HaCaT keratinocytes [
43–
45]. Interestingly, in organ-cultured human hair follicles, exclusive expression of CB
1 was described [
41], whereas CB
2 expression (unlike CB
1) was found on human sebaceous gland-derived SZ95 sebocytes [
42]. AEA and 2-AG were detected in rodent skin [
40,
46], as well as in human organ-cultured hair follicles [
41] and SZ95 sebocytes [
42]. AEA, along with its transporter (AMT/EMT), synthetic and metabolizing enzymes (NAPE-PLD and FAAH) were also identified in cultured NHEK and HaCaT keratinocytes [
43], and in murine epidermal cells/skin [
40,
47]. TRPV1, as key peripheral integrator of various sensory phenomena (e.g. pain, heat, itch), was originally described on nociceptive sensory neurons as a molecular target for capsaicin, the pungent vanilloid ingredient of hot chili peppers [
48]. More recently, similar to CB
1/2, TRPV1 was also found on numerous non-neuronal cells types including human skin epidermal keratinocytes, dermal mast cells, Langerhans cells, sebocytes, sweat gland epithelium and various keratinocyte populations of the hair follicle [
49–
52]. TRPV1 might have important roles in skin health and in certain skin disorders, especially in ones associated with inflammation, pain and itch (e.g. in various types of dermatitis) [
3–
5,
7]. However, the involvement of TRPV1-coupled signaling in the cellular actions of AEA on cell growth, differentiation, proliferation and survival might exert marked cell-type specificity in the skin, and depending on the cell type it can be synergistic, antagonistic or independent from the CB
1/2 receptor stimulation [
41,
42,
45,
51,
52]. The discussion of these complex effects is beyond the scope of this brief synopsis.