PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 July 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2756173
NIHMSID: NIHMS134662

Relationship between Migraine History and Breast Cancer Risk among Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women

Abstract

Both migraine and breast cancer are hormonally mediated diseases, and it is biologically plausible that women with a history of migraine may have a reduced breast cancer risk. However, this relationship has only been assessed in a single relatively small study that was unable to assess the impact of migraine triggers, that are also well established breast cancer risk factors (e.g., use of alcohol and exogenous hormones), on the inverse association observed. Utilizing data on 4,568 breast cancer cases and 4,678 controls who participated in a multi-center population-based case-control study in the United States, we evaluated the association between migraine history and breast cancer risk using unconditional logistic regression. Migraine history data were obtained from structured in-person interviews. Women with a history of migraine had a reduced risk of breast cancer [odds ratio (OR): 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66–0.82]. This risk did not differ by menopausal status, age at migraine diagnosis, use of prescription migraine medications, or when analyses were restricted to women who avoided various migraine triggers (including alcohol, exogenous hormones, and smoking). These data support a previous finding that a history of migraine may be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. It extends the prior report in observing that this relationship holds for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women and is independent of exposure to common migraine triggers.

Keywords: Breast cancer, migraine, histology, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor

INTRODUCTION

In a recent case-control study of post-menopausal women we observed that women with a history of migraine had a 33% lower risk of invasive ductal breast cancer and a 32% lower risk of invasive lobular breast cancer compared to women without such a history.(1) This was the first published report to address a potential relationship between breast cancer risk and migraine, and it was motivated by the influence reproductive hormones have on both breast cancer and migraine. The impacts of both endogenous hormone levels(2) and exogenous hormonal exposures on breast cancer(3, 4) are well established. Migraine is a neurological disorder that is 2–3 times more common in women than in men.(5, 6) This difference is likely due to the influence of estrogen, particularly acute estrogen withdrawal, on migraine onset. Among cycling premenopausal women, the frequency and intensity of migraine changes in the days immediately before and during menses when endogenous estrogen levels reach their nadir.(7) Several studies suggest that approximately 4–14% of migraines occur exclusively around the time of menses,(810) and an estimated 60% of female migraineurs report an increased frequency of migraines around the time of menstrual bleeding.(10) Additionally, women taking oral contraceptives experience more frequent migraines during their hormone-free week.(11) Migraine frequency also decreases during pregnancy, a time when estrogen levels increase considerably. Indeed, by the third trimester, 79% of female migraineurs report complete migraine remission. (12)

The primary motivation for this study was to evaluate the relationship between a history of migraine and risk of breast cancer in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and to assess the potential impact of common migraine triggers, that are also established breast cancer risk factors, on this relationship.

METHODS

The Women’s Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study is a population-based case-control study that recruited women aged 35–64 years old diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1994–1998 from five metropolitan areas: Atlanta, Detroit, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and Seattle. Details of the methods used in this study have been previously published.(13) Cases were ascertained through Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries at four sites (Atlanta, Detroit, Los Angeles, and Seattle) and by field center staff at one site (Philadelphia). Of 5,982 eligible cases identified, 4,575 (77%) were enrolled and interviewed. Female controls without breast cancer were identified by random digit dialing in the same areas and were frequency matched to cases on 5-year age group, race, and study site. Of the 5,956 eligible controls identified, 4,682 (79%) were enrolled and interviewed. The seven cases and four controls with an unknown history of migraine were excluded from all analyses leaving a total of 4,568 cases and 4,678 controls.

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of each participating center, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study excluded all women with a prior history of in situ or invasive breast cancer. All cases and controls were interviewed in-person by trained interviewers using the same questionnaire with standardized probes. Women were asked about exposures occurring before their reference date, which for cases was defined as the date of their breast cancer diagnosis. Reference dates for controls were defined as the dates study staff first contacted a member of prospective controls’ households through random digit dialing. With respect to migraine history, women were asked if “a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you had migraine headaches”, age at migraine diagnosis, and ever use of prescription medications for migraine. In addition, detailed information on other known or suspected breast cancer risk factors, including reproductive history, anthropometric characteristics, use of exogenous hormones, family history of breast cancer, and lifestyle characteristics (including alcohol use and smoking), was collected.

Data on estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, and histology of cases were obtained from SEER registry files (Atlanta, Detroit, Los Angeles, and Seattle) or from pathology reports, medical records, and hospital registry abstracts (Philadelphia). We excluded cases with ER−/PR+ tumors (n=185, due to insufficient statistical power) and cases with an unknown ER/PR status (n=804) from our ER/PR analyses. Histology was classified as ductal (n=3,457, ICD-O code 8500), lobular (n=535, ICD-O codes 8520 and 8522), and other (n=576, all other ICD-O codes).

Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing cases to controls.(14) We compared cases of each ER/PR status and histological type to controls using polytomous logistic regression.(15) All analyses were adjusted for age, race, and study site. The referent category was women with no history of clinically diagnosed migraine. Variables considered as potential confounders or effect modifiers included income, education, age at menarche, parity, age at first birth, type of menopause, age at menopause, duration of oral contraceptive use, use of hormone therapy, first-degree family history of breast cancer, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and average alcohol intake. None of these variables changed our risk estimates by more than 10%, and so none were included as confounders in the final statistical models. Effect modification was assessed using likelihood ratio testing, and none of these variables were observed to be statistically significant effect modifiers (all p-values for interaction>0.05). We also assessed heterogeneity of risk estimates associated with migraine history across breast cancer subtypes defined by ER/PR status and by histology by testing the null hypothesis that the ORs were equivalent to each other (test of homogeneity of ORs). All analyses were conducted using Stata 9.2 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Cases were somewhat more likely than controls to have experienced a natural menopause and to be current users of combined estrogen and progestin hormone therapy (CHT), but were otherwise comparable to controls (Table 1).

Table 1
Selected characteristics of breast cancer cases and population-based controls

Women who reported a clinical diagnosis of migraine had a reduced risk of breast cancer (OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.66–0.82) than women with no history of migraine (Table 2). Breast cancer risk did not differ by age at migraine diagnosis (p=0.84) or by history of ever using prescription migraine medications (p=0.11). This relationship was similarly observed among both premenopausal (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.67–0.93) and postmenopausal women (OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.62–0.87), and among both white (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.68–0.88) and black (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.55–0.82) women. In addition, given that some migraine triggers are also related to breast cancer risk we assessed this relationship among subgroups of women including never drinkers of alcohol over the past 10 years, never smokers, never users of oral contraceptives, and never users of menopausal hormone therapy and for each of these subgroups the same association between migraine history and breast cancer was observed (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.68–0.92; OR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.65–0.90; OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.52–0.87; and OR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.66–0.88, respectively).

Table 2
Relationship between self-reported history of migraine and breast cancer risk

Migraineurs had reduced risks of ER+/PR+ tumors (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60–0.80), ER+/PR− tumors (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.62–1.10), and ER−/PR− tumors (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70–0.99), though the risk estimate for ER+/PR− tumors was within the limits of chance (Table 3). Statistically significant variation in these risk estimates across ER/PR subtypes was observed (p=0.03); in particular, the risk estimate for ER+/PR+ tumors differed from that of ER−/PR− tumors (p=0.04). In contrast, associations between migraine and breast cancer did not vary by histological type; compared to non-migraineurs women with a history of migraine had similarly reduced risks of both ductal (OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.66–0.83) and lobular (OR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.57–0.93) carcinomas (p-value for test of homogeneity of risk across histologies=0.89).

Table 3
Relationship between self-reported clinical history of migraine and risk of breast cancer by estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status and histology

DISCUSSION

Our study found that a history of a clinical diagnosis of migraine is associated with a 26% reduced risk of breast cancer among both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. This result is consistent with the 33% reduction in risk of invasive ductal breast carcinomas observed in the only other published study to assess this relationship.(1) In the data presented here, the association between migraine and breast cancer did not vary substantially by age at migraine diagnosis, but there was some suggestion that risks were lower among women who had used prescription migraine medications. Although we did not assess migraine severity, use of prescription medications may be a proxy for more severe disease, or this observation could also reflect a reduction in risk associated with use of these medications. The lack of a significant effect among women not using medication may also be the result of exposure misclassification since the proportion of women reporting a history of migraine who actually only suffered non-migraine headaches may be higher among the non-medication users compared to the users. However, more detailed studies are needed to carefully assess how factors such as migraine severity, frequency, and/or intensity and use of specific migraine treatments may be related to breast cancer risk.

Common triggers for migraines are use of exogenous hormones, alcohol consumption, and smoking, and each of these exposures is related to breast cancer risk, with the evidence related to exogenous hormones and alcohol use being particularly strong. Given that use of both exogenous hormones and alcohol have been consistently positively related to breast cancer risk,(1, 3, 16), one potential explanation for the relationship between migraine is simply that migraine sufferers are less likely to use exogenous hormones and alcohol and this conveys a lower risk of breast cancer. However, we observed the same relationship between migraine and breast cancer when our analyses were restricted to never users of oral contraceptives, never users of menopausal hormone therapy, women who reported no alcohol consumption over the past 10 years, and never smokers. Thus, differences in these characteristics between migraineurs and women without migraines did not explain the relationship between migraine history and breast cancer risk.

Since NSAIDs are associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer, it is also possible that the relationship between migraine and breast cancer is an artifact of more frequent NSAID use among migraineurs. While this may explain part of the association it is unlikely to explain it entirely. The recent meta-analysis of studies of NSAID use and breast cancer risk observed only a 12% reduction in risk for women classified as ever using any NSAID, and the magnitude of this relationship did not vary when results were restricted to women with high NSAID intake.(17) The magnitude of this risk is less than half that observed with migraine history. In addition, many classes of medications are prescribed for both migraine prevention and treatment of acute attacks. NSAIDs are just one of these types of medications and the only one possibly shown to be related to breast cancer risk (various antidepressants and antihypertensives, which are sometimes used to treat migraine, have not been consistently associated with breast cancer risk across several studies). Since many classes of drugs can be used for migraine, it is unclear what proportion of migraineurs actually use NSAIDs at a level which biologically could confer a reduced risk of breast cancer. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to assess the impact of NSAID use on the relationship between migraine and breast cancer.

The primary motivation for considering a potential link between migraine and breast cancer is that both diseases are hormonally related. The majority of established risk factors for sporadic breast cancer have a hormonal component and, as a result of hormonal changes, migraine attacks can be triggered (such as with drops in estrogen occurring during the natural menstrual cycle) or suppressed (such as during the third trimester of pregnancy when estrogen levels reach a high steady state).(712) However, the precise biology and hormonal pathways of migraine relevant to a potential reduction in breast cancer risk are poorly understood. Migraine is also a heterogeneous disease; not all are associated with hormonal changes. Thus, further studies assessing whether the types and triggers of migraine are associated with breast cancer risk could provide further insight into the biology underlying the relationship between migraine and breast cancer.

It is also important to acknowledge the limitations of this study. Information on clinical diagnosis of migraine, including age at diagnosis and use of prescription migraine medications, was based on patient recall and is subject to bias. We expect that recall of history of a clinical diagnosis of migraine will be reasonably accurate given the typical severity of migraine symptoms precipitating a clinical diagnosis. Misclassification remains an issue in that migraine could have been diagnosed in women who do not actually meet established clinical criteria for such a diagnosis; alternatively, they could have been undiagnosed. The latter situation is likely of greater concern since approximately 27–59% of migraine sufferers are never clinically diagnosed.(5, 18, 19) However, this type of misclassification would most likely be non-differential, primarily because there were no published reports of the relationship between migraine and breast cancer during the time this study was conducted. We should also note that this study did not collect data on the timing, frequency, or intensity of migraine headaches, or information on specific medications used to treat migraines, all of which may be relevant to breast cancer risk. Perhaps most importantly, data on the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), medications commonly used by migraineurs and which are associated with an approximately 12% reduced risk of breast cancer risk,(17) were not collected.

This study provides support for our initial report that migraine is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer and confirms that this relationship is somewhat stronger for hormone receptor positive tumors.(1) It also expands our knowledge of this association by demonstrating that this relationship holds for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women and also among women who are not exposed to a variety of common migraine triggers including exogenous hormones, alcohol, and smoking. However, further work is needed to resolve what accounts for this relationship; such as whether it is a consequence of factors like more frequent NSAID use among migraineurs, or if there are different hormonal milieus or sensitivities in migraineurs compared to women who do not suffer from migraines that convey a lower risk of breast cancer.

Acknowledgments

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This study was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with additional support from the National Cancer Institute, through contracts with Emory University (N01-HD-2-3168), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (N01-HD-2-3166), Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University (N01-HD-3-3174), the University of Pennsylvania (N01-HD-3-3176), and the University of Southern California (N01-HD-3-3175); and through an intraagency agreement with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Y01-HD-7022). The Centers for Disease Control contributed additional staff and computer support. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The collection of cancer incidence data in California used in this publication (University of Southern California Los Angeles County portion of this study) was also supported by the California Department of Health Services as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by the California Health and Safety Code Section 103885. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors, and no endorsement by the State of California, Department of Health Services, is intended or should be inferred.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None of the authors have any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence this work.

References

1. Mathes RW, Malone KE, Daling JR, et al. Migraine in postmenopausal women and the risk of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3116–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Key T, Appleby P, Barnes I, Reeves G. Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group. Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:606–16. [PubMed]
3. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet. 1997;350:1047–59. [PubMed]
4. Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321–33. [PubMed]
5. Lipton RB, Stewart WF. Migraine in the United States: a review of epidemiology and health care use. Neurology. 1993;43:S6–10. [PubMed]
6. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Celentano DD, Reed ML. Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors. JAMA. 1992;267:64–9. [PubMed]
7. Granella F, Sances G, Zanferrari C, Costa A, Martignoni E, Manzoni GC. Migraine without aura and reproductive life events: a clinical epidemiological study in 1300 women. Headache. 1993;33:385–9. [PubMed]
8. Dzoljic E, Sipetic S, Vlajinac H, et al. Prevalence of menstrually related migraine and nonmigraine primary headache in female students of Belgrade University. Headache. 2002;42:185–93. [PubMed]
9. Granella F, Sances G, Pucci E, Nappi RE, Ghiotto N, Napp G. Migraine with aura and reproductive life events: a case control study. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:701–7. [PubMed]
10. Kornstein SG, Parker AJ. Menstrual migraines: etiology, treatment, and relationship to premenstrual syndrome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9:154–9. [PubMed]
11. Sulak PJ, Scow RD, Preece C, Riggs MW, Kuehl TJ. Hormone withdrawal symptoms in oral contraceptive users. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:261–6. [PubMed]
12. Sances G, Granella F, Nappi RE, et al. Course of migraine during pregnancy and postpartum: a prospective study. Cephalalgia. 2003;23:197–205. [PubMed]
13. Marchbanks PA, McDonald JA, Wilson HG, et al. The NICHD Women’s Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study: methods and operational results. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:213–21. [PubMed]
14. Breslow NE, Day NE. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies. IARC Scientific Publications; 1980. Statistical methods in cancer research; pp. 5–338. [PubMed]
15. Begg CB, Gray R. Calculation of polychotomous logistic regression parameters using individualized regressions. Biometrika. 1984;71:11–8.
16. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer - collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 woemn with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer. 2002;87:1234–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Takkouche B, Regueira-Mendez C, Etminan M. Breast cancer and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1439–47. [PubMed]
18. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Celentano DD, Reed ML. Undiagnosed migraine headaches. A comparison of symptom-based and reported physician diagnosis. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1273–8. [PubMed]
19. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Simon D. Medical consultation for migraine: results from the American Migraine Study. Headache. 1998;38:87–96. [PubMed]