LacY
1, a paradigm for the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS), carries out the tightly coupled symport of a galactoside with an H
+, utilizing the free energy released from downhill translocation of H
+ in the presence of a H
+ electrochemical gradient (Δ
H+, interior negative and/or alkaline) to drive accumulation of galactopyranosides against a concentration gradient (reviewed in refs
1,
2). Notably, in the absence of Δ
H+, LacY catalyzes the converse reaction, utilizing free energy released from downhill translocation of sugar to drive uphill translocation of H
+ with the generation of Δ
H+, the polarity of which depends upon the direction of the substrate concentration gradient (
3–
5). LacY also catalyzes exchange or counterflow of sugar without translocation of H
+, and these reactions are unaffected by Δ
H+. Therefore, it is likely that the primary driving force for the global conformational change is concurrent occupancy of co-substrate binding sites.
X-Ray crystal structures of a conformationally-constrained mutant (
6,
7), as well as wild-type LacY (
8), reveal two six-helix bundles with two-fold pseudo-symmetry surrounding a large hydrophilic cavity open only to the cytoplasmic side. The side chains important for both sugar and H
+ binding are at the apex of the cavity, which is in the middle of protein, and inaccessible from the periplasmic side of LacY (). The sugar-binding site is located primarily in the N-terminal bundle on helices IV (Glu126), V (Arg144, Cys148 and Trp151) and VIII (Glu269). In contrast, the residues involved in H
+ translocation/coupling are in the C-terminal bundle and include helices VII (Tyr236, Asp240), VIII (Glu269), X (Lys319, His322 and Glu325) and IX (Arg302). These side chains do not represent a pathway through the membrane for either sugar or H
+, but form two distinct binding sites located at the approximate middle of the LacY molecule across the cavity near the apex (
2).
A mechanism has been proposed for LacY in which both sugar- and H
+- binding sites become alternatively accessible to either side of the membrane as a result of reciprocal opening and closing of periplasmic and cytoplasmic cavities (the alternating access model) (
2,
6,
8). Several independent lines of evidence, which include site-directed alkylation (
9–
13), single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (
14), double electron-electron resonance (
15) and site-directed thiol crosslinking (
16) indicate that sugar binding or to a lesser extent Δ
H+ (interior negative) (
10) increases the open probability of a hydrophilic cavity on the periplasmic side of LacY. Moreover, site-directed thiol crosslinking (
16) also shows that the periplasmic cavity must close, as well as open, for transport to occur. Although the physiological role of LacY is to take up sugar from periplasmic space, the probability of opening the periplasmic cavity is very low, and the great majority of LacY molecules in the membrane appear to be in an inward-facing conformation, as observed in the crystal structures (
6–
8).
Mutational analysis indicates that Asp 240 (helix VII) and Lys 319 (helix X) are salt-bridged (
17,
18). Thus, single neutral replacement of Asp240 or Lys319 with neutral side chains leads to inactivation of transport, while LacY mutants with double neutral replacement of both side-chains exhibit decreased, but significant transport activity. In addition, the polarity of the interaction is critical, as mutant D240K/K319D is inactive, unlike the Asp237 (helix VII)-Lys358 (helix XI) pair, which can be interchanged with no loss in activity (
17,
19,
20). Although replacement of Lys319 with Arg maintains high transport activity, replacement of Asp240 with Glu abolishes active transport (
20).
Crosslinking studies with homobifunctional, thiol crosslinking agents indicate that Asp240 is in close proximity to the Lys319 (
21). In the crystal structures (
6–
8), Asp240 is ~5 Å from Lys319, and both residues participate in a complex salt-bridge/H-bond network that plays a central role in H
+ translocation/coupling. Although interaction between Asp240 and Lys319 is clearly important for lactose/H
+ symport and it has been shown recently that Asp240 mutants have decreased affinity for sugar (I. Smirnova, V. Kasho, J. Sugihara, J-Y. Choe & HRK, manuscript submitted for publication), the role of Asp240 in the transport mechanism is unknown. In this study, we show that the defect in active transport by the D240E mutant is likely due to a decrease in affinity for sugar, as well as an increase in the rate of lactose/H
+ efflux down a concentration gradient. Both defects can be explained by a decrease in affinity for H
+.