|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
In a continuing study, we explored how the individual rings in neo-tanshinlactone (1) influence its potent and selective in vitro anti-breast cancer activity. Accordingly, we discovered a novel class of anti-breast cancer agents, 2-(furan-2-yl) naphthalen-1-ol derivatives, based on an active C-ring opened model compound 5. Further optimization led to 18 and 21, which showed decreased cytotoxic potency, but better selectivity than neo-tanshinlactone analog 2. Interestingly, compound 20 showed broad cytotoxicity against human cancer cell lines.
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death in women today.1, 2 According to the American Cancer Society, breast cancer accounts for more than one quarter of cancers diagnosed in US women. Estrogens play crucial roles in breast cancer development and growth, and estrogen-stimulated growth in tumor cells (as well as in normal cells) requires estrogen receptors (ERs).3 About two-thirds of human breast tumors express higher levels of ERs than normal breast tissues.4 Much effort has been devoted to block estrogen formation and action.2 The most widely used therapy for antagonizing ER function is the antiestrogen tamoxifen (TAM), which binds to the ER and blocks downstream signaling (Figure 1).
However, current breast cancer therapies like TAM achieve meaningful clinical results in only 30–40% of patients, because drug resistance usually develops after one or two years of treatment.2 This resistance occurs via several mechanisms, including induction of estrogen-independent pathways for breast cancer cell growth, over-expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and functional crosstalk between ER and HER2.5–7 A common clinical strategy to overcome drug resistance is to combine an anti-estrogen with another cytotoxic drug, such as anastrozole, an aromatase inhibitor.8, 9 Even so, patients still relapse and cancer reoccurs; therefore, new drug chemotypes with new mechanisms of action are still needed.
Neo-tanshinlactone (1) (Figure 1), a component of the Chinese traditional medicine Tanshen, showed significant and selective cytotoxic activity as compared to TAM.10 Compound 2 (Figure 1), a congener of 1, is about twice as active as 1 against SK-BR-3 cell line.11 1 is a tetracyclic natural product and may be more structurally complex than is necessary for optimal pharmacologic effects. A complex lead compound may have a simpler pharmacophoric moiety buried within its structure, and if this pharmacophore can be clearly defined and ‘dissected out’, the resulting biologically active, simpler molecule may have improved synthetic tractability and be more useful as a scaffold for further analog design. To study the individual contribution of the A-, C-, and D-rings of 1 to the selective activity against breast cancer cells, we first prepared four novel ring-opened model compounds (4–7) (Figure 2).
The preliminary structure-activity relationship (SAR) study results showed that only compound 5, which has an opened C-ring (cleavage of bond 2), showed in vitro anti-breast cancer activity, although it was somewhat less potent than parent compound 3 against MCF-7 cell replication. Further structural modification of 5 generated a series of 2-(furan-2-yl)naphthalen-1-ol derivatives (18–28), which retained potent in vitro anti-breast cancer activity as well as high selectivity against different breast cancer cell lines, especially compound 18. Interestingly, compound 20, a closely related structural derivative of 18, showed broad in vitro cytotoxicity against all human cancer cell lines tested. Preliminary pharmacophore studies and dihedral energy analyses demonstrated that 18 could adopt a conformation close to the tetracyclic structure of 1 and 2 via intramolecular hydrogen bonding. In comparison, the conformation of 20 was more flexible, which could account for its broader spectrum of activity.
As a first step in the current work, we investigated the individual contributions of A-, C-, and D-rings of the neo-tanshinlactone molecule to the biological activity. Systematic structural simplification of 3 by removal of the A-, C-, and D-rings afforded model compounds 4, 5, 6, and 7, respectively (Figure 2). Scheme 1 shows the syntheses of these target compounds. Intermediate 9 was obtained via a tandem alkylation/intramolecular aldol reaction with commercially available 8.12 4 was obtained by treatment of 9 with boron tribromide at 50 °C, followed by treatment with 2-iodopropane to remove the methyl group and incorporate an isopropyl group. 5 was synthesized through hydrolysis of the lactone ring of 10. 11 underwent esterification with furan-3-carbonyl chloride to provide 6. 7 was synthesized from 12 with 3-bromoprop-1-yne.13
Compounds 4–7 were tested for in vitro anticancer activity against two human breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7 (ER+) and SK-BR-3 (HER2+) (Table 1). Compound 4, without an A-ring moiety, was much less potent than its tetracyclic analog 3. The activity of 5, a C-ring opened compound, was comparable to that of 3 against MCF-7 replication (less than twofold difference). However, compound 6, another C-ring opened compound but with cleavage of bond-3 rather than bond-2, was inactive against the tested breast cancer cell lines. Compound 7, a D-ring opened compound, showed marginal activity against the two breast cancer cell lines. The results demonstrated that both the A-ring and D-ring are important in maintaining the biological activity of this compound type. The SAR results of 5 and 6 could be explained by the postulate that intramolecular hydrogen bonding between –COOH and OH groups in 5 maintains the compound’s conformation in a more ring-like structure.
Accordingly, conformational analysis was conducted to study the molecular geometries of 4–7, and the potential SAR relevance of solution structures. As shown in Figure 3, 4–7 possess most of the pharmacophore (PCH) features present in the reference compound 2, including aromatic center, hydrophobic region, hydrogen bond donor and acceptor. However, several key features are also missing in 4–7 in comparison to 2, i.e. two aromatic centers in 4 and 7, and a closed ring in 5 and 6. Interestingly, 5 can form one additional intramolecular hydrogen bond between –COOH and –OH groups in the lowest energy conformer. This hydrogen bond could ‘lock’ the structure into a conformation that is close to the tetracyclic scaffold. Thus, intramolecular hydrogen bonding in 5 may help the compound retain biological potency. However, 5 was much less active compared with 2, which may be due to their differences in susceptibility to efflux transporters or cellular uptake or different binding affinity with the targets. Additional studies will be performed to address these possibilities.
Compound 5 was selected for further structure optimization in order to establish SAR correlations and to identify more active derivatives with the desired biological properties. Substituents on the 5-scaffold will affect the molecule’s overall three-dimensional structure and, thus, the compound’s interaction with its target, which will translate into increased or decreased anti-breast cancer activity. We designed, synthesized, and tested 11 new analogs (Scheme 2, Table 2). Hydrolysis of 13 afforded 1414. The hydroxy group of 14 was methylated by using 18-crown-6 as phase transfer agent, as reported by Glover et al.15 The resulting analog 15 was converted to the methyl ester 16 with thionyl chloride and methanol at room temperature.16 Compound 17 was obtained by reduction of 13 with lithium aluminum hydride.
In order to test for a potential relationship between the intramolecular hydrogen bond (COOH- and OH-groups) and the selective in vitro anti-breast cancer activity, a specific target sub-set (18–20. Table 2) was designed. 18, with OH at position R4 and COOH at position R5, can form an intramolecular hydrogen bond. However, in 19, one hydrogen donor has been effectively removed by methylation of the OH in 18, and in 20, both hydrogen bond donors are blocked with methyl groups. 21–28 were designed to further study SAR of various substituents on the molecule. The newly synthesized analogs 18–28 were tested initially for in vitro anticancer activity against two human breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7 (ER+) and SK-BR-3 cells (HER2+) (Table 2). Both 18 and 20 showed similar activity to TAM against MCF-7 (ED50 3.3 and 2.5 µg/mL, respectively), while 18 showed fivefold better activity than TAM against SK-BR-3 (ED50 1.0 µg/mL) and 20 showed about fourfold better activity than TAM against SK-BR-3 (ED50 1.2 µg/mL). 19 displayed similar activity to TAM against both cell lines. From the ED50 values of compounds 5, 18, and 21, the SAR study suggested that the R1 substituent influenced the in vitro anticancer activity and hydrophobic groups were favored at this position. At the R2 position, methyl was preferable to ethyl (18 vs 24), and at the R3 position, hydrogen was favored over methyl (18 vs 25).
To examine human tumor-tissue-type selectivity, active compounds 18, 20, and 21 (ED50 values >4.0 µg/mL were considered not active) were selected for testing against a limited but diverse set of human cancer cell lines, using 2 as a positive control and “gold-standard”. Compounds 18 and 21 were active only against certain breast cancer cell lines and not active against other tumor tissue cells tested, such as A549 lung cancer or DU145 prostate cancer cell lines. Thus, these two compounds had high tissue selectivity. More interestingly, 18 and 21 also showed very high potency (ED50 0.3 and 0.6 µg/mL, respectively) and selectivity toward the ZR-7-51 (ER+,HER2+) cell line. Compound 18 was three times less potent against SK-BR-3 (HER2+) (ED50 0.9 µg/mL) and ten times less potent against MCF-7 (ER+) (ED50 3.3 µg/mL). 21 was six times less potent against SK-BR-3 (HER2+) (ED50 3.5 µg/mL) and 33 times less potent against MCF-7 (ER+) (ED50 >20 µg/mL). Meanwhile, 2 showed similar potency against ZR-7-51 and SK-BR-3 and was only two times more potent against ZR-7-51 than MCF-7. In summary, 18 and 21 were more potent against ZR-75-1 than cell lines over-expressing either ER or HER2 (MCF-7 or SK-BR-3), and much more potent than cell lines not over-expressing ER or HER2 (remaining cell lines in the panel). Unexpectedly, 20 showed activity against all cancer cell lines tested.
To further explore the physico-chemical basis for the different selectivity profiles between 18 and 20, the dihedral energy analyses were performed over 360 degrees (Figure 4). Compared with 2, 18 retains three aromatic centers and possesses one additional intramolecular hydrogen bond. This hydrogen bond helps to ‘lock’ the conformation close to that of 2, which may explain why the activity pattern of 18 similar to that of 2, but with increased selectivity. The narrow shape of the potential energy well for the dihedral angle between the naphthalene and furan rings implies that it is difficult to vary the angle from the minimum of −135 degree (Figure 4). Thus, the compound’s structure is fairly rigid, leading to a small possibility for 18 to bind to a diverse set of targets. Compound 20 also retains three aromatic centers and hydrogen bond acceptors in common with the tetracyclic compound 2. However, the intramolecular hydrogen bond found in 18 cannot be formed in 20. The dihedral angle between the naphthalene ring and the furan ring is more flexible as seen in Figure 4.17 In comparison to 18, the potential energy surface around the minimum is much flatter and there are fewer energy barriers. As a result, the increased structural flexibility in 20 could permit multi-target interactions and account for its observed broader activity spectrum.
In summary, current data have led to new developments and insights about neo-tanshinlactone-based selective anti-breast cancer active compounds. We demonstrated that aromatic rings A and D were important for the activity. Importantly, we discovered that ring C could be opened through hydrolysis of the ester bond, while keeping the desired biological activity. A new class of active C ring opened compounds, 2-(furan-2-yl) naphthalen-1-ol derivatives, was subsequently developed. Compounds 18 and 21 exhibited much higher selectivity against certain breast cancer cell lines than neo-tanshinlactone analog 2. In addition, compound 20 had potent activity against all cell lines tested, suggesting a different mechanism of action from its structural derivatives. Conformational searches and dihedral energy analyses of 18 and 20 suggested that intramolecular hydrogen bonding was important to form a rigid conformation and improved the in vitro anticancer selectivity of 18. Refinement of the preliminary pharmacophore and conclusion about active conformation will require target identification and analysis of compound interaction. Mechanistic work is underway toward this goal, and results will be reported as they are available. Overall, our current results establish a new scaffold as a promising structure for the development of investigational anti-breast cancer agents. Novel target compounds incorporating the important structural features identified herein are being synthesized for testing and will be reported in due course.
Melting points were measured with a Fisher Johns melting apparatus without correction. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured on a 300 MHz Varian Gemini 2000 spectrometer using TMS as internal standard. The solvent used was CDCl3 unless indicated. Mass spectra were measured on a Shimadzu LC-MS2010 instrument. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and preparative TLC were performed on precoated silica gel GF plates purchased from Merck, Inc. Biotage Flash+ or Isco Companion systems were used for flash chromatography. Silica gel (200–400mesh) from Aldrich, Inc. was used for column chromatography. All other chemicals were obtained from Aldrich, Inc, and Fisher, Inc. All final compounds are >95% pure on the basis of two HPLC conditions.
To a solution of 8 (199 mg, 1.04 mmol) in toluene (9 mL) was added a mixture of HOAc (0.30 mL, 5.20 mmol) and NH4OAc (400 mg, 5.20 mmol) in EtOH (3 mL) and chloroacetone (0.42 mL, 5.20 mmol). The mixture was refluxed 24 h. After cooling, the mixture was diluted with H2O and extracted with EtOAc. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography to give 9 as white solid. 65% yield; mp 148–150 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.34 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.88 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.88–6.93 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.33 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.71–7.74 (m, 1H, aromatic).
To a solution of 9 (46 mg, 0.2 mmol) in DCM (3 mL) was added BBr3 (0.6 mL, 0.6 mmol) dropwise at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 3 h. Water was added to quench the reaction. The solution was extracted with CHCl3 and concentrated for the next step. The above concentrated solid was dissolved in DMF (1 mL) and acetone (3 mL). CsCO3 (195 mg, 0.6 mmol) and 2-iodopropane (0.06 mL, 0.6 mmol) were added to the above solution. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. After removal of solvent, the residue was purified by column chromatography to give 4 as a white solid. 30 % yield; mp 85–87°C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 1.38 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 2.34 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.61 (h, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.86–6.90 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.33 (s, 1H, OCH), 7.71 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, aromatic); HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 259.0965, found: 259.0961.
5-Methylnaphthalen-1-ol (158 mg, 1.00 mmol) was dissolved in THF (5 mL), then DMAP (5 mg) and ethyldiisopropylamine (0.18 mL, 1.02 mmol) were added, and the mixture was cooled to 0 °C for 10 min. Freshly prepared 2-bromo-4-methylbenzoyl chloride in dry THF (10 mL) was added to the mixture, and the resulting mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 2 h and quenched by the addition of water (15 mL). The organic layer was washed with HCl and NaHCO3 and then dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified with flash chromatography to give 6. 46% yield; mp 53–55°C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.72 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.97 (dd, J = 0.6, 5.2 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.33–7.42 (m, 3H, aromatic), 7.51–7.56 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.79 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.93 (d, J = 8.4 Hz,1H, aromatic), 8.32–8.33 (m, 1H, aromatic). HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 253.0859, found: 253.0869.
To a mixture of 12 (212 mg, 1.00 mmol mmol), K2CO3 (300 mg, 2.17 mmol) in acetone (8 mL) was added 3-bromoprop-1-yne (0.17 mL, 1.50 mmol). The mixture was refluxed 12 h. After cooling, the mixture was filtered, concentrated, diluted with H2O and extracted with EtOAc. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography to give 7 as a light yellow solid. 40% yield; mp 205–207 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.70 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, CCH), 4.92 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H, OCH2), 5.93 (s, 1H, COCH), 7.62–7.71 (m, 3H, aromatic), 7.80–7.90 (m, 2H, aromatic), 8.54–8.58 (m, 1H, aromatic); HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 251.0703, found: 251.0697.
Lactone 13 (0.1 mmol) was refluxed in ethanolic aqueous potassium hydroxide (5%, 5 mL) for 3.5 h. Then the reaction mixture was cooled and quenched by pouring into ice, acidified with 6N HCl, and extracted with CHCl3 (3×5 mL). Removal of solvent, drying (Na2SO4), and chromatographic purification gave the hydrolyzed product as a solid.
93% yield; mp 194–196 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3COCD3, ppm): δ 2.27 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 7.51–7.55 (m, 5H, aromatic & OCH), 7.86–7.89 (m, 1H, aromatic), 8.40–8.44 (m, 1H, aromatic); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3COCD3, ppm): δ 10.40, 114.23, 116.83, 120.49, 122.77, 124.28, 126.32, 127.57, 128.16, 128.27, 128.28, 136.14, 141.59, 152.66, 157.87, 169.28; HRMS for ([M-H]+): calcd. 267.0657, found: 267.0663.
90% yield; mp 151–153 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3COCD3, ppm): δ 1.35 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 2.25 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.08 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 7.35–7.37 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.41 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.48 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.62 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 8.24–8.28 (m, 1H, aromatic); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3COCD3, ppm): δ 10.59, 15.63, 26.70, 114.97, 115.54, 120.08, 123.07, 123.51, 125.60, 126.91, 128.26, 128.85, 134.14, 140.47, 140.69, 153.94, 155.61, 171.54; HRMS for ([M-H]+): calcd. 295.0976, found: 295.0972.
80% yield; mp 173–175 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3COCD3, ppm): δ 2.41 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.00 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.98 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.38 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.51 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.64 (s, 1H, OCH) 7.78 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.94 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic). HRMS for ([M-H]+): calcd. 297.0768, found: 297.0765.
90% yield; mp 153–155 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD, ppm): δ 1.24 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 1.35 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 2.78 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 3.07 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 7.34–7.36 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.39 (s, 1H, OCH), 7.49 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.60 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 8.24–8.27 (m, 1H, aromatic). HRMS for ([M-H]+): calcd. 309.1132, found: 309.1124.
66% yield; mp 158–160 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD, ppm): δ 1.35 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 2.17 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.26 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.07 (q, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 7.32–7.38 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.49 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.60 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 8.23–8.26 (m, 1H, aromatic). HRMS for ([M-H]+): calcd. 309.1132, found: 309.1140.
56% yield; mp 208–210 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3COCD3, ppm): δ 1.51 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 2.33 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.23 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 6.97 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.38 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.48 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (s, 1H, OCH), 7.82 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.82 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic). HRMS for ([M-H]+): calcd. 311.0919, found: 311.0940.
Compound 13 (0.1 mmol) was refluxed in ethanolic aqueous potassium hydroxide (5%, 5 mL) for 3.5 h. The solution was washed with CHCl3 and evaporated to give the dipotassium salt, which was refluxed for 24 h with 18-crown-6 (4.35 mg, 0.0145 mmol) and methyl iodide (0.01 mL, 0.159 mmol) in acetonitrile (5 mL). The acetonitrile was removed in vacuo and after dilution with CHCl3. The mixture was washed with water, dried, and concentrated to give an oil. The residue was purified with flash chromatography to give the methyl ether derivative.
39% yield; mp 128–130 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 1.37 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 2.46 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H, CH3),3.09 (q, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 3.73 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.35–7.52 (m, 4H, aromatic & OCH), 7.82 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 8.08 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H, aromatic). HRMS for ([M-H]+): calcd. 309.1127, found: 309.1139.
46% yield; mp 118–120 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.25 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.74 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.35 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.47 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.51–7.54 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.62 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.83–7.86 (m, 1H, aromatic), 8.18–8.22 (m, 1H, aromatic). HRMS for ([M-H]+): calcd. 281.0814, found: 281.0827.
Thionyl chloride (0.05 mL, 0.45 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 °C to a solution of 15 (0.14 mmol) in MeOH (15 mL). The solution was then stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The solvent was evaporated, and the residue was dissolved in EtOAc and washed with a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure to give methyl ester derivative.
82% yield; mp 121–123 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 1.39 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 2.52 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.11 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, CH2CH3), 3.68 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.69 (s, 3H, COOCH3), 7.34–7.49 (m, 3H, aromatic & OCH), 7.54 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.85 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 8.10 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, aromatic); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3COCD3, ppm): δ 10.02, 15.95, 27.00, 51.77, 62.77, 117.86, 120.08, 120.42, 122.15, 123.08, 127.46, 127.58, 128.31, 129.72, 134.87, 141.41, 141.87, 155.77, 156.62, 165.47; HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 325.1434, found: 325.1430.
32% yield; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.25 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.69 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.71 (s, 3H, COOCH3), 7.35 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.50–7.57 (m, 3H, aromatic), 7.64 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.84–7.88 (m, 1H, aromatic), 8.19–8.23 (m, 1H, aromatic). HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 297.1121, found: 297.1110.
LiAlH4 (60 mg, 16 mmol) was added at 0 °C to a solution of 13 (0.1 mmol) in THF (5 mL). The solution was then refluxed for 5 h. Then the reaction mixture was cooled and quenched by pouring into ice, acidified with 2N HCl, and extracted with diethyl ether: DCM=2:1. The solvent was evaporated after drying. The residue was purified by flash chromatography to give the product.
95% yield; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 1.38 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 2.14 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.08 (q, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 4.64 (s, 2H, CH2OH), 7.35–7.44 (m, 3H, aromatic), 7.54 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.64 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.99 (br, 1H, OH), 8.25 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic). HRMS for ([M-H]+): calcd. 281.1183, found: 281.1197.
87% yield; mp 95–97 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3COCD3, ppm): δ 2.13 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.58 (s, 2H, CH2OH), 7.45–7.56 (m, 5H, aromatic & OCH), 7.83–7.87 (m, 1H, aromatic), 8.33–8.36 (m, 1H, aromatic); HRMS for ([M-H]+): calcd. 253.0870, found: 253.0863.
This work was supported by a NIH grant CA-17625 from the National Cancer Institute, awarded to K.H. Lee.