PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbacterPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJB ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
J Bacteriol. 2009 October; 191(20): 6457–6464.
Published online 2009 July 31. doi:  10.1128/JB.00497-09
PMCID: PMC2753037

Identification of the [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Responsible for Hydrogen Generation in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum and Demonstration of Increased Ethanol Yield via Hydrogenase Knockout[down-pointing small open triangle]

Abstract

Three putative hydrogenase enzyme systems in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum were investigated at the genetic, mRNA, enzymatic, and phenotypic levels. A four-gene operon containing two [FeFe]-hydrogenase genes, provisionally termed hfs (hydrogenase-Fe-S), was found to be the main enzymatic catalyst of hydrogen production. hfsB, perhaps the most interesting gene of the operon, contains an [FeFe]-hydrogenase and a PAS sensory domain and has several conserved homologues among clostridial saccharolytic, cellulolytic, and pathogenic bacteria. A second hydrogenase gene cluster, hyd, exhibited methyl viologen-linked hydrogenase enzymatic activity, but hyd gene knockouts did not influence the hydrogen yield of cultures grown in closed-system batch fermentations. This result, combined with the observation that hydB contains NAD(P)+ and FMN binding sites, suggests that the hyd genes are specific to the transfer of electrons from NAD(P)H to hydrogen ions. A third gene cluster, a putative [NiFe]-hydrogenase with homology to the ech genes, did not exhibit hydrogenase activity under any of the conditions tested. Deletion of the hfs and hydA genes resulted in a loss of detectable methyl viologen-linked hydrogenase activity. Strains with a deletion of the hfs genes exhibited a 95% reduction in hydrogen and acetic acid production. A strain with hfs and ldh deletions exhibited an increased ethanol yield from consumed carbohydrates and represents a new strategy for engineering increased ethanol yields in T. saccharolyticum.

Thermophilic anaerobic bacteria have long been of interest for studies of cellulosic biomass conversion due to their native hydrolytic and fermentative abilities (5, 33). However, all thermophilic anaerobes isolated to date have branched fermentation pathways which produce organic acids in addition to solvents such as ethanol (12). For cellulosic fuel production, significant yield loss is likely to be economically unfeasible (11).

In their natural environments, saccharolytic fermentative bacteria participate in interspecies hydrogen transfer, producing hydrogen from carbohydrates that is rapidly consumed by methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria (30). As a result, the hydrogen partial pressure remains exceedingly low, allowing hydrogen (E0′, −414 mV) to be produced not only from ferredoxin (E0′, ~−400 mV) but also from the less favorable electron source NAD(P)H (E0′, −320 mV). Fermentative bacteria benefit from hydrogen production, because they are able to coproduce acetic acid and an additional ATP via acetate kinase (23). When grown in pure culture in a closed fermentation vessel, hydrogen is generated primarily from reduced ferredoxin, since generation from NAD(P)H becomes less favorable as the concentration of hydrogen increases (7).

We have recently demonstrated high-yield ethanol production in the thermophilic anaerobe Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum JW/SL-YS485 through deletion of the l-lactate dehydrogenase (ldh), phosphate acetyltransferase (pta), and acetate kinase (ack) genes (20). In addition to producing ethanol at high yield, this strain produced significantly less hydrogen, as is required to balance end product electron stoichiometry, although hydrogenase activity in cell extracts remained high. In this study, we used gene knockout to identify gene clusters that are implicated in hydrogenase activity in T. saccharolyticum and to identify the hfs gene operon, which is required for hydrogen production. The hfs operon contains a protein with [FeFe]-hydrogenase and PAS sensory domains that is conserved among a few members of the genera Clostridium and Thermoanaerobacter. Strains with hfs deletions showed decreased acetic acid production, and a strain with hfs and ldh deletions produced ethanol at an increased yield.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Media and growth conditions.

T. saccharolyticum JW/SL-YS485 was grown in modified DSMZ 122 medium, containing (per liter) 1.3 g of (NH4)2SO4, 2.6 g of MgCl2·6 H2O, 1.43 g of KH2PO4, 1.8 g of K2HPO4, 0.13 g of CaCl2·2H2O, 6 g of Na-β-glycerophosphate, 0.00013 g of FeSO4·7 H2O, 4.5 g of yeast extract, 0.002 g of resazurin, 0.5 g of l-cysteine-HCl, and 10 of g agarose (for solid media only). Biochemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich, and yeast extract was from BD Difco. The cellobiose concentration and pH were adjusted for different purposes in this study. A cellobiose concentration of 5 g/liter was used for T. saccharolyticum routine growth, transformation recovery, and fermentation with knockout strains, while a cellobiose concentration of 1.8 g/liter was used for fermentation of different strains under conditions that included an N2 or H2 atmosphere. After T. saccharolyticum transformation, the medium was adjusted to pH 6.7 for selection with kanamycin (200 μg/ml) or to pH 6.1 for selection with erythromycin (10 μg/ml). The pH was adjusted to 6.8 for fermentation with different strains under conditions that included an N2 or H2 atmosphere and to 6.4 for fermentation with T. saccharolyticum knockout strains and for routine growth. Batch cultures used for fermentation analysis were inoculated with 6% (vol/vol) of an overnight culture in the same medium and incubated without shaking at 55°C in Hungate tubes (8 ml of liquid volume and 8 ml of headspace). Determination of growth curves of knockout strains was performed using a Powerwave XS microplate reader (Biotek, Winooski, VT) specially outfitted for incubation at 55°C and a 96-well plate with 100 μl of media per well sealed with microplate cover tape.

Strains and plasmids.

Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table Table1.1. T. saccharolyticum was a gift from the laboratory of Juergen Wiegel. Clostridium thermocellum 27405 was from a stock maintained by the Lynd laboratory, originally from the laboratory of Arnold Demain. All other strains were from culture collections or commercial sources.

TABLE 1.
Plasmids and strains used in this study

Plasmid construction.

Knockout plasmids for T. saccharolyticum were generally designed as previously described (6) with either kanamycin or erythromycin resistance cassettes from pIKM1 or pSGD8-erm flanked by 1.0- to 0.5-kb regions homologous to areas 5′ and 3′ of the deletion target of interest. Plasmids pHKO2 and pHKO3 were constructed using traditional cloning techniques and pBluescript KS II(+) (16), and plasmids pHKO7 through pHKO10 were constructed by cloning with Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on in vivo recombination (18) using the S. cerevisiae-E. coli pMQ87 shuttle plasmid. Plasmid maps and primers used in this study are shown in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material.

Transformation of T. saccharolyticum.

T. saccharolyticum was transformed (6, 24) and grown on the appropriate antibiotic and solid media in an anaerobic chamber (COY Labs, Grass Lake, MI). Posttransformation growth with kanamycin selection was performed at 55°C and erythromycin selection at 50°C. Transformation efficiencies of 103 to 104 transformants/μg of DNA within 48 h were routine for kanamycin-based constructs and of 102 to 103 transformants/μg of DNA within 96 h for erythromycin-based constructs. Deletions with chromosomal integration of both flanking regions were confirmed by PCR with primers external to the areas of homologous recombination.

Preparation of cleared cell lysates.

Cells were grown to mid-exponential phase in 40 ml of medium, collected by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C, washed twice in degassed anaerobic 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) buffer supplemented with 5 mM dithiothreitol, and resuspended in 1 ml of the same buffer. Sonication (XL-2000 sonicator; Misonix, Farmingdale, NY) was carried out inside an anaerobic chamber (COY Labs, Grass Lake, MI). The cell suspension was placed in a 2-ml microcentrifuge tube and incubated in an ice-water bath as six 30-s pulses at half-intensity were applied at 30-s intervals. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 5 min to remove unbroken cells. The protein concentration of cleared cell lysates was measured by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

Hydrogenase assay.

Assays were performed anaerobically at 60°C in semimicrocuvettes with rubber stoppers (Starna Cells, Atascadero, CA) sealed in an anaerobic chamber (COY Labs, Grass Lake, MI) with an atmosphere of ~89% N2, 10% CO2, 1% H2. Initial rates of methyl viologen (MV) reduction were measured with a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD) at 578 nm (epsilon = 9.7 mM−1 cm−1) (13). The reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6)-1.0 mM MV-sodium dithionite to reduce the MV to a faint blue color (A578, 0.05 to 0.2; approximately 0.25 mM) and 15 to 20 μg of cell extract. The reaction was begun with the addition of 0.02 mmol of hydrogen to the cuvette headspace (3).

Transcript analysis.

RNA was purified using exponentially growing T. saccharolyticum cell culture (optical density [OD], 0.6 to 0.8) with an RNAeasy purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia CA), RNA-protect reagent, on-column DNase treatment, and a 10-min lysozyme incubation. cDNA was prepared with Thermoscript avian reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and used as a template for transcriptional structure analysis of the hfs genes with Taq polymerase (NEB, Ipswich, MA) and for quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR of genes homologous to hydrogenases with SYBR green detection using an iQ SYBR green Supermix kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and a Bio-Rad iQ5 Q-PCR thermocycler. Primers (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) were designed to bridge open reading frames or to amplify 100- to 120-bp internal fragments and were tested to ensure specificity by agarose gel and melting curve analysis.

Analytical techniques.

Fermentation metabolites were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography using an Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Hydrogen was analyzed by gas chromatography on a silica gel column with nitrogen as the carrier gas with a TCD detector (SRI Instruments, Torrance, CA). Cell dry weight was correlated to OD measurements via a conversion of 0.4 g of dry cell weight/liter per OD unit. Carbon balances were determined according to the following equations, with accounting of carbon dioxide through the stoichiometric relationship of its production to levels of acetic acid and ethanol. The carbon contained in the cell mass was estimated with a general empirical formula for cell composition (CH2N0.25O0.5). The overall carbon balance is as follows:

equation M1
(1)

where Ct = total carbon, CB = cellobiose, G = glucose, L = lactic acid, A = acetic acid, E = ethanol, and CDW = cell dry weight (with all units in grams/liter) and

equation M2
(2)

where CR = carbon recovery, Ct0 = total carbon at the initial time, and Ctf = total carbon at the final time. Electron recoveries were calculated in a similar manner, with the following numbers of available electrons per mole of compound: per mole 48 for cellobiose, 24 for glucose, 8 for acetic acid, 12 for lactic acid, 12 for ethanol, 2 for hydrogen, and 4.75 for cell mass.

equation M3
(3)

equation M4
(4)

Protein sequence analysis.

Protein sequences homologous to putative hydrogenases of T. saccharolyticum were identified using the BLASTP protein-protein algorithm and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database of nonredundant protein sequences. Alignments were performed with VectorNTI software (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using a ClustalW algorithm.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The T. saccharolyticum gene sequences have been deposited with GenBank under the following accession numbers: for hyd cluster II, GQ354411; for the hyd operon, EU313771; for the ech operon, EU313772; and for the hfs operon, GQ354412.

RESULTS

Knockout of hyd and ech hydrogenases.

A draft genome of T. saccharolyticum allowed a search of genes homologous to known hydrogenase enzymes (19). Two gene clusters, one composed of five genes with high-level homology to the NAD-dependent [FeFe]-hydrogenase (hyd, also referred to as hnd) (15) found in Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis and another composed of six genes with high-level homology to the membrane-bound [Ni-Fe] hydrogenase (ech) of T. tengcongensis, were identified as targets potentially involved in hydrogen production (Fig. (Fig.1)1) (19). Soboh et al. demonstrated that these two enzymes are responsible for hydrogen production in T. tengcongensis (21), and they are in fact the only two enzymes exhibiting hydrogenase activity in T. tengcongensis cell extracts (R. Hedderich, personal communication). The ech hydrogenase is interesting, as it appears to be of archaeal origin, having been acquired through horizontal gene transfer (4). In addition, it has been shown to transport H+/Na+ ions across the cell membrane during hydrogen production (16) and shares homology with subunits of the NADH-quinone oxidoreductase (complex I) in respiring organisms (8).

FIG. 1.
Genetic maps of the hyd (A), ech (B), and hfs (C) genes. The phrase “homology regions” refers to areas of homologous recombination used to generate knockout strains; the deleted area lies between the upstream and downstream homology for ...

However, strains of T. saccharolyticum lacking either or both of the complete hyd or ech gene clusters do not show any decrease in hydrogen or acetic acid production in batch fermentation (Table (Table2).2). A gene that exhibits partial homology to an [FeFe]-hydrogenase 2 kb upstream of the hyd gene cluster that has been labeled hyd cluster II for this study also had no effect on hydrogen production when deleted (data not shown). The hyd cluster II location and amino acid sequence are conserved in many thermophilic bacteria containing the hyd genes; however, the hyd cluster II gene lacks a well-defined catalytic H cluster, as determined on the basis of sequence alignments.

TABLE 2.
Fermentation profiles of T. saccharolyticum knockout strainsa

Knockout of the hfs gene cluster.

A further investigation of the draft genome identified a gene cluster of four open reading frames containing putative Fe-S clusters. Two of these open reading frames code for proteins homologous to [FeFe]-hydrogenases. Deletion of this gene cluster resulted in strain HKO3 (Δhfs), which produced >95% less hydrogen than the wild-type strain (Table (Table2)2) and produced significantly less acetic acid, as expected due to the requirement to balance electron flux (12, 23). Strains with this deletion also displayed a growth defect, reaching a lower final cell density than the wild-type strain (Fig. (Fig.22).

FIG. 2.
Growth curves of the wild-type strain ([filled lozenge]) and of strains lacking hyd (□), hfs ([filled triangle]), and ldh plus hfs (○) grown at 55°C in medium 122 in a microplate reader. Data represent the averages of the results of eight replicate ...

hfs transcript analysis.

Based on genomic sequence data, the hfs genes compose a likely operon, as the open reading frames of hfsA, hfsB, and hfsC all overlap each other by a single base pair and as there is a 45-bp gap between the open reading frames of hfsC and hfsD. To test this possibility, wild-type T. saccharolyticum cDNA was used as a template for PCR using primers amplifying the gaps between hfs genes and genes outside of the putative operon. Figure Figure33 shows that a transcriptional operon was detected for the hfs genes and that transcription did not extend further in the 5′ or 3′ direction.

FIG. 3.
Reverse transcriptase PCR of hfs and adjacent genes. Primers were designed to amplify the regions between the hfs genes (lanes B, C, and D) and between the hfs genes and adjacent genes (lanes A and E). cDNA from the wild-type strain (lanes 1 to 5) was ...

Enzymatic assay and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR of hydrogenase genes.

As seen in Table Table3,3, MV hydrogenase activity was assayed with cleared lysate cell extracts of strains with hyd, ech, and hfs deletions as well as the hfs hydA double mutant. MV acts as a universal electron acceptor-donor and is able to interact with hydrogenases that have either NAD(P)H or ferredoxin as a natural substrate (27). It is expected that the majority of enzymatic activity present in whole cells is also present in the cleared lysates; however, is it possible that enzymatic activity present in the membrane fraction could be underrepresented. The cell extract from the Δhyd strain showed a decrease of more than 50% in MV hydrogenase activity, although strain HKO1 produced hydrogen yields nearly identical to those seen with the wild-type strain. The Δhfs and Δech strains had MV hydrogenase activities comparable to those of the wild-type strain. However, cell extract from a Δhfs ΔhydA strain had no detectable hydrogenase activity, suggesting that these two enzymes are responsible for the observed MV hydrogenase activity in the wild-type strain.

TABLE 3.
Hydrogenase enzymatic activity assayed with respect to MV reduction and RNA expression of putative catalytic hydrogenase subunits relative to 16S RNA expression

In addition, transcript levels were tested in these strains by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR to detect genes with homology to hydrogenase catalytic subunits and are reported relative to 16S RNA transcript levels (Table (Table3).3). In the wild-type strain, the hydA, hyd2, echE, hfsB, and hfsD genes all appear to be expressed. In the hyd and ech knockout strains, hfsD may be upregulated relative to the wild-type level, influencing cell extract hydrogenase activities. Surprisingly, transcript levels for hydrogenases in hfs knockout strains are significantly lower than in the wild-type strain. It is not yet clear why the other hydrogenase transcript levels are so reduced in strains HKO3 and HKO6, although it was noted that the hfs deletion imparts a growth defect that could affect transcript levels.

Fermentation products of knockout strains.

The Δhfs strain produced primarily lactic acid in place of acetic acid under the conditions tested, resulting in an ethanol yield relatively the same as the wild-type strain yield. A small amount of hydrogen was produced by the Δhfs strain, and strains were constructed with hydA and ech deletions in the background of a Δhfs strain to see whether residual hydrogen would be abolished. This result was not seen, however, and a Δhyd Δech strain did not have any impact on hydrogen yields either. The ALK2 strain (Δldh Δpta Δack) (20) also produced a small amount of hydrogen, a result not stoichiometrically predicted for catabolic metabolism, as all available reducing equivalents from carbohydrates are expected to be directed to ethanol via ferredoxin-NAD(P)H oxidoreductase, acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, and alcohol dehydrogenase. This fermentation study was done using rich media to facilitate cell growth of knockout strains, and it is possible that hydrogen was being produced from a pathway separate from carbohydrate metabolism. Also, levels of carbon and electron recovery from strains with hfs deletions were about 10% less than the levels seen with strains without this deletion. It is possible that some metabolic flux is redirected to an as-yet-unidentified compound in these strains.

In order to test the hypothesis that ethanol yields can be increased via a hydrogenase knockout, strain HKO7 (Δhfs Δldh) was created. This strain produced ethanol at a yield of 1.35 mM ethanol per mM consumed glucose equivalent, a 44% increase from the wild-type level (Table (Table2).2). The ethanol yield was lower than that seen with strain ALK2, due to the production of a small amount of acetic acid and a lower level of carbon recovery. It is not yet clear why this strain was unable to completely consume the available cellobiose.

DISCUSSION

Deletion of the hfs gene cluster was found to have a significant impact on hydrogen and acetic acid production in T. saccharolyticum, suggesting that it is the physiological ferredoxin-linked hydrogenase active in this organism. Although the majority of MV hydrogenase activity in T. saccharolyticum is due to the hyd enzyme, deletion of these genes did not alter fermentation product yields when T. saccharolyticum was grown in pure culture, which is consistent with it being an NAD(P)H-linked enzyme operating in the direction of hydrogen generation. In addition, the T. saccharolyticum hydB gene aligns closely with the hydB genes from Thermotoga maritima and T. tengcongensis, which have been shown to contain NAD(P)+ and flavin mononucleotide binding sites (21, 26). The hyd enzyme purified from T. tengcongensis has a catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of 1.6 × 106 M−1 s−1 for hydrogen generation compared to an efficiency of 1.5 × 105 M−1 s−1 for hydrogen uptake, suggesting that the physiological activity of this enzyme is hydrogen production (21).

In contrast to that of T. tengcongensis, the ech enzyme of T. saccharolyticum does not appear to participate in hydrogen production or result in hydrogenase activity under the conditions observed in this study. In addition, growth in a minimal medium treated with an Ni2+ binding resin (Chelex-100) showed no difference in product yields compared to growth in an identical medium supplemented with 0.1 mM NiCl2, further suggesting that the ech enzyme, which contains an active [Ni-Fe] site cluster, does not participate in end product formation (data not shown).

hfsB and hfsD both encode proteins with homology to [FeFe]-hydrogenases. In addition to multiple groups of conserved cysteine residues, an indication of the presence of Fe-S clusters (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), both genes have conserved amino acid residues in the three regions of the H-cluster active site: H1 ([140]TTSCPSVN), H2 ([181]IGPCXXKKXE), and H3 ([297]CDGGCINGP) in hfsB and H1 ([276]TSSCCPAIV), H2 ([327]IGPCXXKK), and H3 ([451]CIGGCIGGAGV) in hfsD (14, 26) (numbers in brackets are the starting amino acid positions of the sequences, underlining indicates highly conserved residues, and capital letters without underlining are less highly conserved residues). hfsB also has homology to a PAS sensor motif near its C terminus. PAS domains are typically part of two-component kinase signaling systems and are known to respond to redox potential and overall cellular energy levels, among other stimuli (22). Genes containing a regulatory or sensory domain in addition to an [FeFe]-hydrogenase domain have been noted during sequencing studies, for example, an [FeFe]-hydrogenase domain fusion with a sigma-54-dependent transcriptional regulator in Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans (31) and three genes in Halothermothrix orenii with PAS and transcriptional regulatory domains (15). The protein sequence of hfsC shares homology with predicted serine phosphatases and SpoEII, a sporulation regulatory phosphatase involved in σF factor activation in Bacillus subtilis (1), further suggesting that the hfs genes may have a regulatory as well as a metabolic role in T. saccharolyticum. hfsA does not align closely with proteins of known function but exhibits some homology to the large subunit of [FeFe]-hydrogenases.

Homologues to the hfs gene cluster are present in several clostridia that have sequenced genomes. Somewhat surprisingly, the closest identity match across the entire gene cluster is with Clostridium phytofermentans, a mesophilic cellulose degrader (28). The hfsABC genes are well conserved across sequenced strains of C. botulinum, C. cellulolyticum, C. phytofermentans, and C. thermocellum (Table (Table4).4). The C. thermocellum hfsD gene closely aligns with hydA homologs, and two other genes with high homology to hydB and hydC are located between hfsC and hfsD. C. thermocellum contains separate copies of hydA, hydB, and hydC in the standard hyd gene cluster on its genome. Both T. ethanolicus 39E and T. tengcongensis contain homologues for only hfsB and hfsC. The diverse genomic arrangements of these genes in other organisms raise questions about their function and could be an interesting area for further research.

TABLE 4.
Amino acid sequence homology to the hfs gene cluster of T. saccharolyticum

Growth inhibition and end product shifts in the presence of hydrogen have been reported to various degrees for many of the thermophilic saccharolytic bacteria. At one extreme, Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and T. tengcongensis are reported to be completely inhibited by a headspace of 20- to 56-kPa hydrogen (21, 25, 32). In contrast, during the course of this study it was found that the growth and product profile of T. saccharolyticum is not influenced in the presence of up to 185-kPa hydrogen. T. ethanolicus 39E is reported to be inhibited by 100- to 200-kPa hydrogen, although an adapted strain showed higher hydrogen tolerance (10, 29), and C. thermocellum is reported to grow in the presence of >250-kPa hydrogen, albeit with a product profile shift (2, 9). To see whether the hfs genes are associated with hydrogen tolerance in these organisms, several strains were grown in the absence and presence of hydrogen (Table (Table5).5). Interestingly, strains lacking or containing a partial hfs gene cluster showed the greatest reduction in end product formation when grown under conditions that included a hydrogen atmosphere, although C. phytofermentans, with a compete hfs gene cluster, showed a product shift away from acetate formation. Use of a soluble ferredoxin-linked hydrogenase, such as that encoded by the hfs genes, rather than a membrane-bound, energy-conserving hydrogenase, such as the ech hydrogenase, would produce 0.25 mol less ATP per mole of hydrogen generated due to electron transport phosphorylation, assuming a requirement of four protons per molecule of ATP formed by ATP synthase (17). However, utilization of the hfs hydrogenase may facilitate growth in the presence of hydrogen, which would be beneficial for organisms in environments where interspecies hydrogen transfer has not been well established.

TABLE 5.
Effect of hydrogen on fermentation end productsa

To increase the ethanol yield in T. saccharolyticum, metabolic steps consuming pyruvate are key branch points in the fermentation pathway. Unlike the lactic acid pathway, where electrons are added to pyruvate from reduced NADH generated during glycolysis, the pathways to acetic acid and ethanol begin with a further oxidation of pyruvate to acetyl coenzyme A and reduced ferredoxin. This additional reduction of electron carriers, which must ultimately be balanced in end product formation, allows two distinct control points that determine acetic acid and ethanol yields (12). Panel A of Fig. Fig.44 shows the approach taken with strain ALK2, which can be considered “carbon” centered with respect to directing flux away from acetic acid and toward ethanol. Panel B shows an “electron”-centered approach, where acetic acid production is limited by removing the ability to produce hydrogen, as demonstrated by the strain HKO7 results shown here. The electron-centered metabolic engineering approach provides a new route for raising solvent yields in the industrially relevant thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobes that share fermentation pathways similar to those of T. saccharolyticum (5, 12, 22).

FIG. 4.
Knockout strategies for increasing ethanol yield. (A) Carbon-centered approach, exemplified by strain ALK2 (Δldh Δpta Δack). (B) Electron-centered approach, exemplified by strain HKO7 (Δldh Δhfs). CoA, coenzyme ...

Conclusion.

This study began with the intent to demonstrate that ethanol yields of T. saccharolyticum could be increased by inactivation of the hydrogen production pathway. When it was found that deletion of the hyd and ech genes, which are responsible for hydrogen production in T. tengcongensis, did not affect the ethanol yield, the study took a somewhat new direction toward discovery of the genes responsible for hydrogen production. Identification of the hfs genes provides some insight into how T. saccharolyticum produces hydrogen when grown in pure culture but also raises more questions about how these genes are regulated in response to environmental or other stimuli and about their function in other organisms. In particular, the discovery that the PAS sensory domain containing hfsB is involved in hydrogen production could be a starting point for further investigation into this interesting [FeFe]-hydrogenase variation.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Mascoma Corporation and the Link Foundation Energy Fellowship.

Footnotes

[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 31 July 2009.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

1. Arigoni, F., L. Duncan, S. Alper, R. Losick, and P. Stragier. 1996. SpoIIE governs the phosphorylation state of a protein regulating transcription factor sigma F during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:3238-3242. [PubMed]
2. Bothun, G. D., B. L. Knutson, J. A. Berberich, H. J. Strobel, and S. E. Nokes. 2004. Metabolic selectivity and growth of Clostridium thermocellum in continuous culture under elevated hydrostatic pressure. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 65:149-157. [PubMed]
3. Bryant, F., and M. W. Adams. 1989. Characterization of hydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic archaebacterium, Pyrococcus furiosus. J. Biol. Chem. 264:5070-5079. [PubMed]
4. Calteau, A., M. Gouy, and G. Perriere. 2005. Horizontal transfer of two operons coding for hydrogenases between bacteria and archaea. J. Mol. Evol. 60:557-565. [PubMed]
5. Demain, A. L., M. Newcomb, and J. H. Wu. 2005. Cellulase, clostridia, and ethanol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69:124-154. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Desai, S. G., M. L. Guerinot, and L. R. Lynd. 2004. Cloning of l-lactate dehydrogenase and elimination of lactic acid production via gene knockout in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum JW/SL-YS485. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 65:600-605. [PubMed]
7. Gottschalk, G. 1986. Bacterial metabolism. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
8. Hedderich, R., and L. Forzi. 2005. Energy-converting [NiFe] hydrogenases: more than just H2 activation. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 10:92-104. [PubMed]
9. Lamed, R. J., J. H. Lobos, and T. M. Su. 1988. Effects of stirring and hydrogen on fermentation products of Clostridium thermocellum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:1216-1221. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Lovitt, R. W., G. J. Shen, and J. G. Zeikus. 1988. Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: biochemical basis for ethanol and hydrogen tolerance in Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. J. Bacteriol. 170:2809-2815. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Lynd, L. R., W. H. van Zyl, J. E. McBride, and M. Laser. 2005. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16:577-583. [PubMed]
12. Lynd, L. R., P. J. Weimer, W. H. van Zyl, and I. S. Pretorius. 2002. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:506-577. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Ma, K., and M. W. Adams. 2001. Ferredoxin:NADP oxidoreductase from Pyrococcus furiosus. Methods Enzymol. 334:40-45. [PubMed]
14. Peters, J. W., W. N. Lanzilotta, B. J. Lemon, and L. C. Seefeldt. 1998. X-ray crystal structure of the Fe-only hydrogenase (Cpl) from Clostridium pasteurianum to 1.8 angstrom resolution. Science 282:1853-1858. [PubMed]
15. Posewitz, M. C., D. W. Mulder, and J. W. Peters. 2008. New frontiers in hydrogenase structure and biosynthesis. Curr. Chem. Biol. 2:178-199.
16. Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
17. Sapra, R., K. Bagramyan, and M. W. W. Adams. 2003. A simple energy-conserving system: proton reduction coupled to proton translocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:7545-7550. [PubMed]
18. Shanks, R. M. Q., N. C. Caiazza, S. M. Hinsa, C. M. Toutain, and G. A. O'Toole. 2006. Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based molecular tool kit for manipulation of genes from gram-negative bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5027-5036. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Shaw, A. J., F. E. Jenney, M. W. W. Adams, and L. R. Lynd. 2008. End-product pathways in the xylose fermenting bacterium, Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 42:453-458.
20. Shaw, A. J., K. K. Podkaminer, S. G. Desai, J. S. Bardsley, S. R. Rogers, P. G. Thorne, D. A. Hogsett, and L. R. Lynd. 2008. Metabolic engineering of a thermophilic bacterium to produce ethanol at high yield. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:13769-13774. [PubMed]
21. Soboh, B., D. Linder, and R. Hedderich. 2004. A multisubunit membrane-bound [NiFe] hydrogenase and an NADH-dependent Fe-only hydrogenase in the fermenting bacterium Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis. Microbiology 150:2451-2463. [PubMed]
22. Taylor, B. L., and I. B. Zhulin. 1999. PAS domains: internal sensors of oxygen, redox potential, and light. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:479-506. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Thauer, R. K., K. Jungermann, and K. Decker. 1977. Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 41:100-180. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Tyurin, M. V., L. R. Lynd, and J. Wiegel. 2006. Gene transfer systems for obligately anaerobic thermophilic bacteria. Extremophiles 35:309-330.
25. van Niel, E. W., P. A. Claassen, and A. J. Stams. 2003. Substrate and product inhibition of hydrogen production by the extreme thermophile, Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 81:255-262. [PubMed]
26. Verhagen, M., T. O'Rourke, and M. W. W. Adams. 1999. The hyperthermophilic bacterium, Thermotoga maritima, contains an unusually complex iron-hydrogenase: amino acid sequence analyses versus biochemical characterization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1412:212-229. [PubMed]
27. Verhagen, M., and M. W. Adams. 2001. Fe-only hydrogenase from Thermotoga maritima. Methods Enzymol. 331:216-226. [PubMed]
28. Warnick, T. A., B. A. Methé, and S. B. Leschine. 2002. Clostridium phytofermentans sp. nov., a cellulolytic mesophile from forest soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:1155-1160. [PubMed]
29. Wiegel, J., L. G. Ljungdahl, and J. R. Rawson. 1979. Isolation from soil and properties of the extreme thermophile Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. J. Bacteriol. 139:800-810. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Wolin, M. J., and T. L. Miller. 1982. Interspecies hydrogen transfer: 15 years later. ASM News 48:561-565.
31. Wu, M., R. Qinghu, A. S. Durkin, S. C. Daugherty, L. M. Brinkac, R. J. Dodson, R. Madupu, S. A. Sullivan, J. F. Kolonay, W. C. Nelson, L. J. Tallon, K. M. Jones, L. E. Ulrich, J. M. Gonzalez, I. B. Zhulin, F. T. Robb, and J. A. Eisen. 2005. Life in hot carbon monoxide: the complete genome of Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans Z-2901. PLoS Genet. 1:563-574. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Xue, Y., Y. Xu, Y. Liu, Y. Ma, and P. Zhou. 2001. Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis sp. nov., a novel anaerobic, saccharolytic, thermophilic bacterium isolated from a hot spring in Tengcong, China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51:1335-1341. [PubMed]
33. Zeikus, J. G., A. Ben-Bassat, T. K. Ng, and R. J. Lamed. 1981. Thermophilic ethanol fermentations. Basic Life Sci. 18:441-461. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)