The scavenging of O
2− generated during the respiratory burst by
F.
tularensis SODs likely circumvents ROS-dependent killing prior to bacterial escape from phagosome to cytosol.
Francisella tularensis can inhibit activation of the respiratory burst in neutrophils (
25); however, this potential is limited in macrophages (
1). Macrophages deficient for PHOX are less efficient at killing
F.
tularensis (
21), suggesting a role for this enzyme in bacterial clearance. Macrophage-dependent killing of
F.
tularensis LVS is also associated with increased IFN-γ-dependent production of NO (
12). Addition of iNOS inhibitors to IFN-γ-treated macrophages or neutralization of IFN-γ or tumor necrosis factor alpha prevents NO production and
F.
tularensis killing (
12,
14). It has been proposed that the nearly diffusion-limited reaction product of O
2− and NO, ONOO
−, is primarily responsible for macrophage-dependent killing of
F.
tularensis (
21). Our findings suggest that
F.
tularensis SODs play an important role in intramacrophage survival by primarily resisting microbicidal activity of extracellular ROS.
SODs play diverse roles in virulence and adaptation of many bacterial pathogens to their intracellular lifestyle (
8,
22,
30,
34).
F.
tularensis encodes two putative
sod genes,
sodB and
sodC. The constitutively expressed SodB of
F.
tularensis is required for survival, and its decreased activity both enhances its sensitivity to oxidative stress and attenuates bacterial virulence in mice (
2). The SodB enzyme has been identified in secreted (
31), soluble, and membrane fractions (our unpublished observations), while SodC is predicted to be localized to the periplasm, and its presence has been confirmed in membrane fractions (
31). The transcript levels of
sodB are consistently high even in the absence of an oxidative stress (our unpublished data), whereas
sodC levels are induced following macrophage infection (
33). The diversity of these two SODs encoded by
F.
tularensis prompted us to investigate whether they work cooperatively to protect from oxidative insult. Our studies indicate that
F.
tularensis LVS strains with single and multiple
sod mutations exhibit enhanced sensitivity to ROS and RNS, reduced survival in macrophages, and an attenuated virulence in mice.
During construction of the
F.
tularensis LVS
sodC mutant, no merodiploid reversions to the WT were observed, unlike the
F.
tularensis sodB mutant (
2). This observation suggests that
F.
tularensis SodC is dispensable for survival when SodB is present. However, SodC was important for optimal growth in response to redox cycling drugs (paraquat and pyrogallol) and IFN-γ-activated macrophages. Partial restoration of intramacrophage growth of the
sodC-deficient strains was observed when ROS or RNS production was impaired by PHOX or iNOS inhibition; on the other hand, the Δ
sodC mutant regained its full virulence similar to WT mice in
phox−/− or
inos−/− mice. These findings suggest that SodC is primarily responsible for neutralizing extracellular ROS. It was also observed that the Δ
sodC mutant was sensitive to paraquat similar to the
sodB Δ
sodC mutant. Paraquat redox cycles and generates O
2− intracellularly so it was somewhat surprising to observe the loss of SodC-sensitized bacteria to paraquat while SodB was still present. Although
F.
tularensis SodC is predicted to reside in the periplasm, it has not been confirmed biochemically. It is possible that SodC may not be restricted to the periplasmic compartment or that periplasmic SodC may confer protection from intracellular sources of O
2−. Both of these possibilities are currently being explored.
The increased sensitivity of the
F.
tularensis sodB Δ
sodC mutant to ROS also indicates that both SODs confer combinatorial protection from oxidative stress. The
sodB Δ
sodC mutant was also more sensitive to H
2O
2 which is likely due to enhanced Fenton chemistry resulting from the failure to scavenge O
2− (
16). Both the WT LVS and the Δ
sodC mutant can neutralize excess O
2−, restricting divalent metal reduction and subsequent OH
− radical production.
SOD deficiency failed to sensitize
F.
tularensis to the direct effects of NO when grown acellularly (Fig. ). However, the growth of the SOD-deficient strains was impaired in response to long-term exposure to a low dose of IFN-γ or short-term exposure to a high dose of IFN-γ (Fig. ) and was associated with higher NO production (data not shown). NO reacts with O
2− to form ONOO
− at rates that limit diffusion (
5). Furthermore, the intracellular survival of the SOD-deficient strains was partially restored by inhibiting either PHOX or iNOS activity. Further, virulence of the Δ
sodC mutant was restored in both
inos−/− and
phox−/− mice to a level similar to that of the WT LVS, suggesting that
F.
tularensis SodC plays an important role in its virulence.
Our findings indicate that SODs are necessary for F. tularensis to achieve peak virulence. sod mutants of F. tularensis not only exhibit defects in their ability to survive and replicate within macrophages but are generally attenuated for virulence in the mouse model of respiratory tularemia. The virulence of the F. tularensis sodB ΔsodC mutant was significantly more attenuated than that for the ΔsodC mutant. The absence of IFN-γ, iNOS, or PHOX restored the virulence of ΔsodC mutant strains, suggesting that the CuZnSOD of F. tularensis plays a critical role in restricting the bactericidal affects of ROS and possibly RNS.
Given
Francisella's need to survive in a diverse range of hosts and environments, it is not surprising it has evolved SODs that function independently. Many bacterial SODs confer redundant protection to maintain virulence (
7), and on the basis of our observations, SodB appears to have an essential role in resistance to oxidative stress, and the Δ
sodC mutant displays a phenotype similar to that of the attenuated
F.
tularensis sodB mutant (
2). Given the roles of SodC in antioxidant defense, intramacrophage survival, and virulence of other bacterial pathogens (
22), this enzyme may not serve a function redundant to SodB. It is also possible that SodB may cooperate with periplasmic SodC to neutralize exogenous O
2− generated while the bacteria reside in phagosomes in addition to restricting endogenous production of O
2−. Functional redundancy and compensatory replacement for SODs have been reported in other bacterial species (
7). However, the absence of one
sod gene in
F.
tularensis does not allow for compensation by the other
sod gene (our unpublished observations), suggesting that each SOD serves a unique purpose and may act in a combinatorial fashion. Our findings demonstrate that
F.
tularensis SODs are required for resistance to O
2− generated by IFN-γ-activated macrophages and are not necessary for survival in quiescent macrophages. Overall, these studies provide evidence that
F.
tularensis SODs play an important role in its pathogenesis and serve to protect the pathogen from extracellular host-derived ROS.