Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of aapspharmspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006 March; 7(1): E175–E183.
Published online 2006 March 17. doi:  10.1208/pt070125
PMCID: PMC2750732

Acoustic-resonance spectrometry as a process analytical technology for rapid and accurate tablet identification


This research was performed to test the hypothesis that acoustic-resonance spectrometry (ARS) is able to rapidly and accurately differentiate tablets of similar size and shape. The US Food and Drug Administration frequently orders recalls of tablets because of labeling problems (eg, the wrong tablet appears in a bottle). A high-throughput, nondestructive method of online analysis and label comparison before shipping could obviate the need for recall or disposal of a batch of mislabeled drugs, thus saving a company considerable expense and preventing a major safety risk. ARS is accurate and precise as well as inexpensive and nondestructive, and the sensor, is constructed from readily available parts, suggesting utility as a process analytical technology (PAT). To test the classification ability of ARS, 5 common household tablets of similar size and shape were chosen for analysis (aspirin, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, vitamin C, and vitamin B12). The measures of successful tablet identification were intertablet distances in nonparametric multidimensional standard deviations (MSDs) greater than, 3 and intratablet MSDs less than 3, as calculated from an extended bootstrap erroradjusted single sample technique. The average intertablet MSD was 65.64, while the average intratablet MSD from cross-validation was 1.91. Tablet mass (r2=0.977), thickness (r2=0.977), and density (r2=0.900) were measured very accurately from the AR spectra, each with less than 10% error. Tablets were identified correctly with only 250 ms data collection time. These results demonstrate that ARS effectively identified and characterized the 5 types of tablets and could potentially serve as a rapid high-throughput online pharmaceutical sensor.

Keywords: Sound, chemometrics, pharmaceuticals, process analytical technology (PAT), integrated sensing and processing (ISP)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (236K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
1. US Food and Drug Administration. Magno-Humphries, Inc. voluntarily recalls one lot of Dison’s®, Acetaminophen 325 mg Analgesic, 100 Tablet bottles. Available at: Accessed: April 1, 2005.
2. US Food and Drug Administration. Process Analytical Technology (PAT) Initiative. Available at: Accessed: April 1, 2005.
3. Lu Z, Hickey C, Sabatier J. Effects of compaction on the acoustic velocity in soils. Soil Sci Am J. 2004;68:7–16. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0007. [Cross Ref]
4. Buice R, Pinkston P, Lodder R. Optimization of acoustic-resonance spectrometry for analysis of intact tablets and prediction of dissolution rate. Appl Spectrosc. 1994;48:517–524. doi: 10.1366/000370294775268929. [Cross Ref]
5. Medendorp J, Lodder RA. Integrated Sensing and Processing and a Novel Acoustic-Resonance Spectrometer. Baltimore, MD: American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences; 2004.
6. Medendorp J, Lodder RA. Acoustic Resonance Spectrometry and Analysis of Powder Drying. Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy; March 7–12, 2004; Chicago, IL.
7. Medendorp J, Lodder RA. Applications of Integrated Sensing and Processing (ISP) in Acoustic and Optical Sceptroscopy. Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy; February 27-March 4, 2005; Orlando, FL.
8. Serris E, Camby-Perier L, Thomas G, Desfontaines M, Fantozzi G. Acoustic emission of pharmaceutical powders during compaction. Powder Technol. 2002;128:296–299. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(02)00174-2. [Cross Ref]
9. Reynaud P, Dubois J, Rouby D, Fantozzi G. Acoustic emission monitoring of uniaxial pressing of ceramic powders. Ceramics Int. 1992;18:391–397. doi: 10.1016/0272-8842(92)90071-K. [Cross Ref]
10. Martin L, Poret J, Danon A, Rosen M. Effect of adsorbed water on the ultrsonic velocity in alumina powder compacts. Mater Sci Eng. 1998;252:27–35. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00669-8. [Cross Ref]
11. Kaatze U, Wehrmann B, Pottel R. Acoustical absorption spectroscopy of liquids between 0.15 and 3000 MHz, I: high resolution ultrasonic resonator method. J Phys E Sci Instrum. 1987;20:1025–1030. doi: 10.1088/0022-3735/20/8/014. [Cross Ref]
12. Bolotnikov M, Neruchev Y. Speed of sound of hexane+1-chlorohexane, hexane+1-iodohexane, and 1-chlorohexane+1-iodohexane at saturation condition. J Chem Eng Data. 2003;48:411–415. doi: 10.1021/je0256129. [Cross Ref]
13. Shah V, Tsong Y, Sathe P, Liu J. In vitro dissolution profile comparison-statistics and analysis of the similarity factor f2. Pharm Res. 1998;15:889–896. doi: 10.1023/A:1011976615750. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Shah V, Williams R. Roles of dissolution testing: regulatory, industry, and academic perspectives. Available at: http://www. March 15, 2005.
15. Drennen J, Lodder RA. Nondestructive near-infrared analysis of intact tablets for determination of degradation products. J Pharm Sci. 1990;79:622–627. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600790717. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Zannikos P, Li W, Drennen J, Lodder R. Spectrophotometric prediction of the dissolution rate of carbamazepine tablets. Pharm Res. 1991;8:974–978. doi: 10.1023/A:1015840604423. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Dousseau F, Pezolet M. On the spectral subtraction of water from the FTIR spectra of aqueous solutions of proteins. Appl Spectrosc. 1989;43:538–543. doi: 10.1366/0003702894202814. [Cross Ref]
18. Dousseau F, Pezolet M. Determination of the secondary structure content of proteins in aqueous solutions, from their amide I and amide II infrared bands. Biochemistry. 1990;29:8771–8779. doi: 10.1021/bi00489a038. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Maddams W, Southon M. The measurement of derivative IR spectra, III: the effect of band width and band shape on resolution, enhancement by derivative spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta [A] 1982;38:459–466.
20. Fleissner G, Hage W, Hallbrucker A, Mayer E. Improved curve resolution of highly overlapping bands by comparison of fourth-derivative curves. Appl Spectrosc. 1996;50:1235–1245. doi: 10.1366/0003702963904962. [Cross Ref]
21. Cassis LA, Dai B, Urbas A, Lodder RA. In vivo applications of a molecular computing-based high-throughput NIR spectrometer. Proc. SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2004;239:5329–5344.
22. Kirmse D, Westerberg A. Resolution enhancement of chromatograph peaks. Anal Chem. 1971;43:1035–1039. doi: 10.1021/ac60303a002. [Cross Ref]
23. Maldacker T, Davis J, Rogers L. Applications of Fourier transform techniques to, steric-exclusion chromatography. Anal Chem. 1974;46:637–642. doi: 10.1021/ac60342a019. [Cross Ref]
24. Buice RG, Lodder RA. Determination of cholesterol using a novel magnetohydrodynamic acoustic-resonance near-IR spectrometer. Appl Spectrosc. 1993;47:887–890. doi: 10.1366/0003702934415237. [Cross Ref]
25. Ultrasonic Scientific. High Resolution Ultrasonic Spectroscopy for Material Characterization. Available at: http://www.ultrasonic-scientific. com. Accessed: April 1, 2005.
26. Halliday D, Resnick R, Walker J. Fundamentals of Physics. New York, NY: Wiley; 2001.
27. Mills T, Jones A, Lodder R. Identification of wood species by acoustic-resonance spectrometry using multivariate subpopulation analysis. Appl Spectrosc. 1993;47:1880–1886. doi: 10.1366/0003702934065957. [Cross Ref]
28. Ono Y, Jen CK, Cheng CC, Kobayashi M. Real time monitoring of injection molding for microfluidic devices using ultrasound. Poly Eng Sci. 2005;45:606–612. doi: 10.1002/pen.20310. [Cross Ref]
29. Kowalska B. Ultrasonic measurements in polymeric processing. Polimery. 2005;50:646–650.
30. Moisan JF, Jen CK, Liaw JW, et al. Ultrasonic sensor and technique for in-line monitoring of die casting process. Meas Sci Tech. 2001;12:1956–1963. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/12/11/327. [Cross Ref]
31. Kilian & Co Inc. Product showcase for pharmaceutical manufacturing, pharmaceutical process technology engineering. Available at: DocID={E21A91E3-9BB6-11D4-8C69-009027DE0829}&VNETCOO-KIE=NO/.Accessed: November 25, 2005.
32. Lodder R. CD/MP3 acoustic resonance spectrometer. Available at: Accessed: April 1, 2005.
33. Jolliffe IT. Principal Component Analysis. New York, NY: Springer; 2002.
34. Alves M, Oliveira M. Interpolative biplots applied to principal component analysis and canonical correlation analysis. J Chemometr. 2003;17:594–602. doi: 10.1002/cem.827. [Cross Ref]
35. Hamilton S, Lodder R. Hyperspectral imaging technology for pharmaceutical analysis. Proc Soc Photo-Optic Instrum Eng. 2002;4626:136–147.
36. Lowell A, Ho K-S, Lodder RA. Remote hyperspectral imaging of endolithic biofilms using a robotic probe. Contact Context. 2002;1:1–10.
37. Buice R, Lodder RA. Determination of Cholesterol Using a Novel Magnetohydrodynamic Acostic-Resonance Near-IR (MARNIR) Spectrometer. Appl Spectrosc. 1993;47:887–890. doi: 10.1366/0003702934415237. [Cross Ref]
38. Lai E, Chan B, Chen S. Ultrasonic resonance spectroscopic analysis of microliters of liquids. Appl Spectrosc. 1988;42:526–529. doi: 10.1366/0003702884427906. [Cross Ref]
39. Ritter T. Random noise sources. Available at: Accessed: April 1, 2005.
40. Western Red Cedar Physical Properties. Available at:

Articles from AAPS PharmSciTech are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists